Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Trump on defensive as media paint judge controversy as Republican problem
This is what it looks like when the whole world is against you.
The media are denouncing Donald Trump. The Democrats are denouncing Donald Trump. Other Republicans are denouncing Donald Trump—in fact, not a single prominent member of the GOP is defending him.
And it all stems from a self-inflicted wound.
When the House speaker, Paul Ryan, who just reluctantly endorsed Trump, describes Trump’s remarks about a judge of Mexican heritage as “a textbook racist comment” that is “indefensible,” you’ve got a problem.
Trump tried to subtly tone things down when Bill O’Reilly asked him about the firestorm. Trump had doubled and tripled down in a series of interviews—with the Wall Street Journal, CNN and CBS—saying that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel could not be fair to him in the Trump University suit because of his Mexican heritage. Curiel was born in Indiana.
On the Factor, without retracting his previous comments, Trump said: “I don’t care if the judge is Mexican or not.”
He also tried to shift the spotlight to the press:
“The question was asked to me.” Trump said he would rather be talking
about other issues, “but every time I go onto a show, all they want to
do is talk about Trump University…Frankly, I don’t even like wasting my
time talking about this lawsuit.”
But any candidate can brush off questions he doesn’t want to deal with, as Trump sometimes does. It’s harder when you’ve made an ethnic-based criticism against a sitting federal judge, that journalists naturally want to ask about.
Trump tried again yesterday with a campaign statement: "It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage...I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial."
But the most important sentence may have been this one: "I do not intend to comment on this matter any further."
During the primaries, there was a similar uproar over Trump’s proposal to temporarily bar Muslims from entering the United States, with widespread media and political condemnation. But it turned out that most Republican primary voters agreed with him. Now, however, Trump has to deal with a much broader electorate.
More important, the Muslim proposal was connected to national security. Whether you found the plan offensive or not, Trump could always pivot to the argument that we had to get the system under control to ensure that Islamic terrorists didn’t slip through and kill innocent people.
But the only larger issue in the Curiel case involves one of Trump’s business ventures. The allegations have been kicking around, and journalists have been writing about them, for years. So Trump has allowed his campaign to be diverted over a private grievance at a time when he is trying to unite the GOP against Hillary Clinton.
The media are loving this, and not just because it’s a juicy story. For a year now, journalists have been reporting on Trump saying controversial and inflammatory things and predicting his imminent demise, only to see him keep winning. So there is a bit of see-we-told-you-so now that this story has blown up.
Newt Gingrich, despite reports that he is on Trump’s VP list, said it was the candidate’s biggest mistake. Lindsey Graham, who had been tiptoeing toward a rapproachement with Trump, is now asking GOP leaders to un-endorse him. It has been painful to watch other Republicans, from Mitch McConnell to Chris Christie to Bob Corker, dance around the controversy.
Former rivals like Marco Rubio can’t resist: “I ran for president, and I warned this was going to happen.”
And the press seems determined to make this a Republican Party problem.
Just take a look at the Washington Post’s op-ed page yesterday:
George Will: “The ‘Big Price’ Paul Ryan Has Paid for Supporting Donald Trump.”
Richard Cohen: “Paul Ryan’s Profile in Cowardice.”
Dana Milbank: Republicans Discover that Trump is an Actual Racist.”
Gene Robinson: “Endorsing Trump Will Leave a Mark.”
And he gets whacked by the New York Times editorial page: “Mr. Trump holds the rule of law in contempt.”
Plus, Buzzfeed has decreed that he is so odious it is canceling a million-dollar RNC advertising contract on Trump’s behalf.
You’re even starting to see comments like this, from CNBC contributor and former anchor Ron Insana:
“I am beginning to think Trump will not be the Republican candidate for president this year. The GOP may abandon him. He may not be able to field a VP. He can't find surrogates. I predict he may take his ball and go home.”
Trump isn’t going anywhere. The question is whether his statement enables him to move on from this mess and how much he has damaged himself, especially with Hispanic voters and leaders of his own party.
He has been a master of changing the subject in the past. But scrutiny as a general election nominee is more intense than when you’re mocking your rivals as Lyin’ Ted and Little Marco. Trump had better hope that Clinton, who has clinched her own nomination, is subjected to the same level of media probing and skepticism.
Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.
The media are denouncing Donald Trump. The Democrats are denouncing Donald Trump. Other Republicans are denouncing Donald Trump—in fact, not a single prominent member of the GOP is defending him.
And it all stems from a self-inflicted wound.
When the House speaker, Paul Ryan, who just reluctantly endorsed Trump, describes Trump’s remarks about a judge of Mexican heritage as “a textbook racist comment” that is “indefensible,” you’ve got a problem.
Trump tried to subtly tone things down when Bill O’Reilly asked him about the firestorm. Trump had doubled and tripled down in a series of interviews—with the Wall Street Journal, CNN and CBS—saying that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel could not be fair to him in the Trump University suit because of his Mexican heritage. Curiel was born in Indiana.
On the Factor, without retracting his previous comments, Trump said: “I don’t care if the judge is Mexican or not.”
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
But any candidate can brush off questions he doesn’t want to deal with, as Trump sometimes does. It’s harder when you’ve made an ethnic-based criticism against a sitting federal judge, that journalists naturally want to ask about.
Trump tried again yesterday with a campaign statement: "It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage...I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial."
But the most important sentence may have been this one: "I do not intend to comment on this matter any further."
During the primaries, there was a similar uproar over Trump’s proposal to temporarily bar Muslims from entering the United States, with widespread media and political condemnation. But it turned out that most Republican primary voters agreed with him. Now, however, Trump has to deal with a much broader electorate.
More important, the Muslim proposal was connected to national security. Whether you found the plan offensive or not, Trump could always pivot to the argument that we had to get the system under control to ensure that Islamic terrorists didn’t slip through and kill innocent people.
But the only larger issue in the Curiel case involves one of Trump’s business ventures. The allegations have been kicking around, and journalists have been writing about them, for years. So Trump has allowed his campaign to be diverted over a private grievance at a time when he is trying to unite the GOP against Hillary Clinton.
The media are loving this, and not just because it’s a juicy story. For a year now, journalists have been reporting on Trump saying controversial and inflammatory things and predicting his imminent demise, only to see him keep winning. So there is a bit of see-we-told-you-so now that this story has blown up.
Newt Gingrich, despite reports that he is on Trump’s VP list, said it was the candidate’s biggest mistake. Lindsey Graham, who had been tiptoeing toward a rapproachement with Trump, is now asking GOP leaders to un-endorse him. It has been painful to watch other Republicans, from Mitch McConnell to Chris Christie to Bob Corker, dance around the controversy.
Former rivals like Marco Rubio can’t resist: “I ran for president, and I warned this was going to happen.”
And the press seems determined to make this a Republican Party problem.
Just take a look at the Washington Post’s op-ed page yesterday:
George Will: “The ‘Big Price’ Paul Ryan Has Paid for Supporting Donald Trump.”
Richard Cohen: “Paul Ryan’s Profile in Cowardice.”
Dana Milbank: Republicans Discover that Trump is an Actual Racist.”
Gene Robinson: “Endorsing Trump Will Leave a Mark.”
And he gets whacked by the New York Times editorial page: “Mr. Trump holds the rule of law in contempt.”
Plus, Buzzfeed has decreed that he is so odious it is canceling a million-dollar RNC advertising contract on Trump’s behalf.
You’re even starting to see comments like this, from CNBC contributor and former anchor Ron Insana:
“I am beginning to think Trump will not be the Republican candidate for president this year. The GOP may abandon him. He may not be able to field a VP. He can't find surrogates. I predict he may take his ball and go home.”
Trump isn’t going anywhere. The question is whether his statement enables him to move on from this mess and how much he has damaged himself, especially with Hispanic voters and leaders of his own party.
He has been a master of changing the subject in the past. But scrutiny as a general election nominee is more intense than when you’re mocking your rivals as Lyin’ Ted and Little Marco. Trump had better hope that Clinton, who has clinched her own nomination, is subjected to the same level of media probing and skepticism.
Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.
Trump brushes aside judge controversy, goes after Clinton
Donald Trump brushed aside the latest controversy over his remarks on a federal judge Tuesday night to deliver a broadside against Hillary Clinton -- even promising to deliver a blockbuster speech on her next week -- as he closed out the primary season with another set of wins, while saying he understands the “responsibility” of being the presumptive GOP nominee.
“I understand the responsibility of carrying the mantle,” Trump said. “I will never, ever let you down.”
His remarks come as Fox News projects Trump has surpassed a new milestone in the Republican primary contest Tuesday night.
With fresh victories in California, New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico and South Dakota, Trump now has enough bound delegates alone to clinch the GOP nomination, no longer having to rely in part on ‘unbound’ delegates, technically free to change their minds, to amass the 1,237 needed to secure the nomination.
In turning his attacks on Clinton, the billionaire businessman said she and former President Bill Clinton “have turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves” and that Hillary Clinton “turned the State Department into her own private hedge fund."
“They’ve made hundreds of millions of dollars selling access, selling favors, selling government contracts,” Trump said from Trump National Golf Club, in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
“Secretary Clinton even did all of the work on a totally illegal private server … designed to keep her corrupt dealings out of the public record.”
Trump made no mention of U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, presiding over a civil fraud suit related to Trump University, attempting to end a controversy that has hurt his campaign in recent weeks.
He has said that Curiel, whose parents are Mexican, cannot be impartial in the case, considering Trump has vowed to build a wall along the southern U.S. border to keep out Mexican “rapists” and “drug dealers.”
“It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage,” Trump said earlier Tuesday, in a 700-word statement, an apparent attempt to move past the controversy,
Trump also wrote that he does not intend to comment further but used the statement to elaborate on his initial claim that a federal judge’s Mexican heritage presented a conflict of interest for him in Trump University litigation.
The statement capped what was arguably Trump’s toughest day of criticism from leading members of his own party.
House Speaker Paul Ryan earlier Tuesday called the remarks the “textbook definition of a racist comment.” Ryan disavowed Trump’s comments, calling them “unacceptable.”
Trump’s comments were immediately denounced by a number of high-profile Republicans.
Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., who is facing a tough re-election race, said Tuesday he will no longer support Trump for president.
He said he would not support presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, either, and would instead “write in General Petraeus.”
Sanders to lay off most campaign staff over next week
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will lay off "over half" of his campaign staff over the next week, a senior campaign official confirmed to Fox News Wednesday.
Confirmation of the layoffs, which were first reported by The New York Times, came after Sanders vowed to continue his bid for the Democratic nomination despite Hillary Clinton securing a majority of pleged delegates and superdelegates ahead of next month's convention.
The Times reported that most of those being laid off are advance and field staff members, some of whom may be moved to jobs at Sanders' Senate office. Politico reported that campaign personnel whose work isn't related to next month's District of Columbia primary or the convention will be let go.
"Most of the field staff will likely get their 10-day notice tomorrow because there's no work for then to do," a former Sanders state director told Politico.
Sanders plans to return to his home in Vermont Wendesday before traveling to Washington Thursday for meetings with President Barack Obama and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.
Clinton clinches Democratic nomination – Sanders vows to fight on
The Democrats deserve her as Their Leader :-) |
As Clinton now launches a general election battle against presumptive rival Donald Trump, Sanders remained defiant at an early Wednesday morning rally in Los Angeles. Far from bowing out, he vowed to campaign through the final primary next Tuesday in Washington, D.C., and then “take our fight for social, economic, racial and environmental justice to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,” the site of the convention.
The crowd erupted in cheers as Sanders announced he’d keep going, a decision he kept close to the vest right up until his remarks.
Sanders closed by declaring: “Thank you all, the struggle continues.”
The remarks were in some ways surprising considering not only Clinton’s historic achievement but her strong performance overall in Tuesday’s primaries. While winning at least three states, she also is leading in early returns out of delegate-rich California, though Sanders predicted that gap would close.
Clinton earlier claimed victory over Sanders – after attaining the delegates needed to claim the nomination with a New Jersey primary win – during a lofty speech to supporters in Brooklyn.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
Marking the historic moment, Clinton said: “This campaign is about making sure there are no ceilings, no limits on any of us.”
She also congratulated Sanders, calling his campaign and the debate he brought about income inequality good for the party – while also saying this is a moment to “come together.”
In a potential move toward reconciliation, the White House revealed that President Obama called both Clinton and Sanders Tuesday night – and plans to meet with Sanders at the White House on Thursday, to discuss "how to build on the extraordinary work he has done to engage millions of Democratic voters."
Clinton tried to pivot to November at the close of the last major day of primary voting.
Eight years to the day after she conceded to rival Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, the former first lady and secretary of state became the presumptive 2016 nominee with the help of delegates in New Jersey. She won the state's primary, and with it enough delegates to easily surpass the 2,383 needed to clinch the nomination. She also is projected to win New Mexico and South Dakota.
Clinton's victory, however, is based in part on the support of superdelegates, officials who are free to support any candidate and who do not technically vote for a nominee until the Democratic National Convention next month. Sanders has vowed to stay in the race in hopes of convincing enough of them to abandon Clinton and support him instead.
Speaking in Los Angeles, Sanders again vowed to fight “for every vote and every delegate,” hammering his campaign themes of campaign finance reform and economic justice and calling for “transforming our country.”
It is still too early to call a winner in the California race, whose outcome could also weigh on Sanders’ calculations going forward.
However, Fox News can project that with the delegates she is winning in California, Clinton will have now won a majority of all pledged delegates at the Democratic convention -- making it more difficult for Sanders to argue she’s winning only because of support from superdelegates.
Sanders did notch projected wins Tuesday in North Dakota’s Democratic caucuses and the Montana primary. A total of six states were voting Tuesday.
On the GOP side, Trump -- the only major Republican left in the race – was projected to win the primaries in California, Montana, New Jersey, South Dakota and New Mexico. Trump also surpassed a new milestone in the primary contest Tuesday night, winning enough bound delegates alone to clinch the GOP nomination.
Marking his victories during remarks at Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y., Trump said: “Tonight, we close one chapter in history and we begin another.”
Previewing the general election battle, he slammed the Clintons, alleging they “turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves.” He also appealed to Sanders supporters, saying, “We welcome you with open arms.”
Clinton, in her victory speech, also took shots at Trump, claiming he would “take America backwards.”
“The stakes in this election are high, and the choice is clear. Donald Trump is temperamentally unfit to be president,” she said.
The contests Tuesday largely conclude one of the most unpredictable and rowdy primary seasons in modern history – one that saw a brash billionaire clear through a formidable field of 16 rivals to defy the pundits and claim the GOP nomination, and the front-runner on the Democratic side locked in a fight to the end against a socialist-leaning senator from Vermont.
Voting formally ends next week when the District of Columbia holds its Democratic primary.
Even before Tuesday’s contests, both parties effectively had their presumptive nominees. Trump clinched the nomination last month as late support from unbound delegates put him over the top, and his remaining rivals suspended their campaigns. The Associated Press declared Monday night that Clinton had hit the 2,383-delegate mark, thanks to a burst of support from free-agent superdelegates.
But unlike Trump, Clinton’s last remaining rival has not exited the race.
“There is nothing to concede,” Sanders said in a TV interview Monday night.
Sanders also had said he’d “assess” his plans after Tuesday’s elections, as he heads home to Burlington, but gave no indications of having second thoughts during his Los Angeles rally.
The Democratic Party pressure on him, however, is sure to mount in a matter of days, if not hours. Obama reportedly is planning to get behind Clinton and start campaigning for her, and senior Democrats have been voicing mounting frustration with Sanders’ campaign.
At the same time, the senator has touted general election polls suggesting he may be better positioned to go up against Trump in the fall. Over the course of the campaign, he mounted an unexpectedly strong challenge to Clinton, buoyed by the support of young and energetic voters whose enthusiasm at times echoed the spirit behind Barack Obama’s bid in 2008. Clinton was dogged all along by questions about her private email use while secretary of state – and a still-ongoing FBI investigation – though Sanders largely steered clear of the issue in his campaign.
Trump, by contrast, will have no compunction about hammering Clinton for what he describes as “criminal” activity with her email use, as the general election race now moves into full swing. He did so Tuesday night, ripping her use of a "totally illegal private server."
Both presumptive nominees have been cranking up their attacks on each other in anticipation of their November brawl.
Yet even as Trump has seen all 16 of his rivals fade away, he’s still struggling in a historic way to unite the GOP behind him. The tensions flared again this week as leading Republicans condemned his comments that a federal judge of Mexican heritage had a conflict of interest in a Trump University case. On Tuesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan called it the “textbook definition of a racist comment.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Tit for Tat ? ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) — A statue of abolitionist Frederick Douglass was ripped from its base in Rochester on the an...
-
NEW YORK (AP) — As New York City faced one of its darkest days with the death toll from the coronavirus surging past 4,000 — more th...