Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Operation Fight With Fire #StandWithSean


From MediaEqualizer.com:
Working Together, Against the Suppression of the First Amendment by the Left
NEW YORK, NY, May 30, 2017 – Today, conservatives stand together with #StoptheScalpings to push back against the attempt to silence those who dare to ask tough questions and pursue the truth. Sean Hannity, of Fox News, took it upon himself to delve deeper into a story, one that left many unanswered questions requiring further investigation.
#StopTheScalpings is part of the Media Equality Project, a new organization launched by Brian Maloney and Melanie Morgan, two longtime talk show hosts, political and media analysts.
The DNC, mainstream media, George Soros, and Media Matters for America, deemed Sean Hannity’s pursuit of the facts too close for comfort. In an effort to protect their ilk, and the secrets they keep, they have created a false narrative. They have defamed Hannity’s character, his work and political positions.
Media Matters has now targeted Sean Hannity’s advertisers all in a back door effort to remove financial support for the show. They do this to silence his voice, because it does not speak in unison with their own.
For months there has been a widespread media narrative advancing a conspiracy theory that the Trump campaign and the Russians colluded to release the DNC emails to Wikileaks, to hurt Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Continue reading from MediaEqualizer.com

RELATED: Rachel Maddow Show: Advertisers and Contact Information

Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel Cartoons





Why does Vox have a problem with masculine Marines?


It takes a special kind of low life to smear the military on Memorial Day. And the folks who run the lefty website Vox – are that kind of low life.
They published a despicable hit piece accusing the Marine Corps of having a toxic masculinity problem -- compared them to a fraternity house.
Click here for a free subscription to Todd's newsletter: a must-read for Conservatives! 
Author Alex Ward said there was a fight for the soul of the Marine Corps. 
"There’s a 'toxic masculinity culture' in the Marine Corps, James Joyner, a professor at the Marine Command and Staff College, told me. That may be what is at the core of the women-in-infantry debate among Marine ranks: the identity crisis of a historically macho club now being forced to let in women," Ward wrote.
As if there's something wrong with demanding that our fighting men -- be masculine?
The story sparked widespread outrage among patriots on social media.
"Vox marks Memorial Day by crapping on the Marines," Twitchy declared.
‘Call me crazy but I'm pretty sure the Marine Corps is supposed to be both masculine and toxic," popular blogger Matt Walsh tweeted.
Click here to join Todd on Facebook - one of the nation's biggest conservative communities. 
But we're dealing with the kind of people who seem to want our Marines to prance into battle wearing high heels and camouflage rompers.
I am unfamiliar with Mr. Ward, but it sounds as if Vox has a toxic snowflake problem. Liberal newsrooms have a history of attracting writers who suffer from microaggressions at the mere mention of the military or anything patriotic.
That's the only reasonable explanation for why an American news publication would intentionally attack the military on Memorial Day.
Did you know President Obama was once an avid reader of Vox? Not surprising.
  I am all but certain the Vox report would've caused a meltdown in the Obama Pentagon -- think mandatory group hugs, essential oils and white wine spritzers.
But there are no white wine spritzers in Defense Secretary James "Mad Dog" Mattis' Pentagon.
"Find the enemy that wants to end this experiment (in American democracy) and kill every one of them until they’re so sick of the killing that they leave us and our freedoms intact," the retired general once said.
And if that quote doesn't trigger the progressives, consider the general's opinion on men who beat up women:
"You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them. Actually it's quite fun to fight them, you know. It's a hell of a hoot. It's fun to shoot some people. I'll be right up there with you. I like brawling."
Oorah, Secretary Mattis! Oorah!
All that to say, I sincerely doubt our brave Marines are going to lose any sleep over the flatulent emissions coming from the emasculated pajama boys over at Vox.
  Semper Fi, America.
Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary. His latest book is “The Deplorables’ Guide to Making America Great Again.” Follow him on Twitter @ToddStarnes and find him on Facebook.

Trump, Germany's Merkel clash over trade, NATO and 'Western values'

Another Hillary Clinton?
Germany and the U.S. emerged from Memorial Day weekend in a war of words, as Chancellor Angela Merkel and her coalition partners attacked America’s reliability as a world power and President Trump fired back on Twitter.
Merkel said at a beer tent rally in Munich Sunday that Germany cannot "fully rely" on the U.S., and that continental Europe “really must take our fate into our own hands.”
Martin Schulz, head of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD), which is Merkel's coalition partner in the federal government, went further, calling Trump a "destroyer of all Western values."
“The chancellor represents all of us at summits [NATO and G7] like these,” said Schulz, seen as a challenger to Merkel in the upcoming September election. "I reject with outrage the way this man takes it upon himself to treat the head of our country's government.”
Trump countered on Tuesday, renewing his allegation Germany doesn't pay its full, 2 percent of GDP share toward defense -- a requirement of NATO membership. He also rapped the European economic powerhouse for its trade policies.
“We have a MASSIVE trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay FAR LESS than they should on NATO & military," Trump tweeted. "Very bad for U.S. This will change"

Economists agree with Trump that the U.S. trade gap favors Germany by $67.8 billion per year. That trade deficit is the second largest after China's $310 billion advantage over the U.S.
MERKEL URGES EU TO CONTROL ITS OWN DESTINY, AFTER TRUMP VISIT, CLIMATE CHANGE DECISION
Trump has confronted Merkel over her country's failure to meet the NATO guidelines for defense expenditures. Germany is one of the 23 NATO members that has not met the 2 percent goal of defense spending. The European economic powerhouse ranked 15th among NATO members, spending a mere 1.2 percent of its gross national product on military defense.
The U.S., Greece, Poland, Britain and Estonia are the only NATO members who meet (or exceed) NATO’s criteria for armed forces spending. A Politico story published last week, titled "Trump's right about Germany," said "Merkel's economic policies really are hurting the U.S.”
MERKEL: EUROPE MUST STAY UNITED IN FACE OF ALLY UNCERTAINTY
It is not the first time that anti-American rhetoric has played a role in a German election campaign. Former social democratic Chancellor Gerhard Schröder mobilized voters around anti-American sentiments to win the 2002 election. In his memoir, “Decision Points,” President George W. Bush accused Schröder of reneging on German support for the U.S. in the Iraq war. That touched off a war of words between Bush and Germany’s then justice minister.
When he was foreign minister, Germany's current social democratic president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, called Trump a "hate preacher." Steinmeier’s successor as foreign minister, the social Democrat Sigmar Gabriel, has pivoted away from the U.S and toward the Islamic Republic of Iran. Just days after the U.S and other world powers reached a nuclear deal with Iran in 2015 to curb its atomic program, Gabriel went to Iran with a delegation of business leaders. He made a second trip last year to jump-start business deals with Iran.
This past week, Gabriel was engulfed in scandal after inviting a hard-line anti-Western, anti-U.S. Iranian cleric to the foreign ministry for a conference promoting religious peace. The extremist Iranian religious leader Hamidreza Torabi, a key organizer of the Quds event in Berlin, an anti-Western rally calling for the destruction of the Jewish state, appeared at the foreign ministry event.
Torabi sponsors buses for pro-Hezbollah and pro-Iranian regime activists to travel to Quds, which also serves as a gathering spot for boycott campaigns against Israel.
Although the U.S. has designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, Merkel has declined to outlaw the Lebanese militant group. There are 950 active members and supporters of Hezbollah in Germany.
The Israeli Embassy told Fox News that Germany should have never invited Torabi to the conference.
“Any person who incites violence has no place in a dialogue that uses religions as a bedrock to bring peace, tolerance and understanding between people, nations and religions,” the ministry said. “Moreover, there is no doubt that a person who incites violence against Israel and Jews in the name of God, in the city of Berlin, has no place in such a dialogue, certainly not one organized by the German government.”
Torabi, who heads the Islamic Academy of Germany, held a poster in downtown Berlin at the 2016 anti-Israel Quds rally urging the “rejection of Israel” and terming the Jewish state “illegal and criminal.”

Gregg Jarrett: Jared Kushner gets mugged by the media mob


“This nation was dedicated to freedom under law, not under mobs.”
So wrote the late Justice, Tom Clark, who gave me my first tour of the Supreme Court in the 1970s.  Justice Clark cared deeply about the role of the news media in holding our government accountable.  But he would be dispirited to see their embrace of “mobocracy,” as he once described it.
The mob as a ruling class is today’s mainstream media.  They assert political control by denigrating and vilifying.  No act by the Trump administration, however slight, will be spared a full-throated scandal as declared by the media.  All deeds are treated as crimes or impeachable offenses.  
The latest victim is President Trump’s son-in-law and White House adviser, Jared Kushner.  His crime appears to be no crime at all.  He met with two foreign officials from Russia –an ambassador and a banker.  Back channel communications were allegedly discussed.  Mass hysteria in both print and television ensued.
There was no attempt at reasoned analysis, no context of historical precedence.
The media all but shouted, “off with his head!”   Execution first.  A trial with real or imagined evidence sometime later, if ever.
Back Channel Communications
The Washington Post ignited the media firestorm by publishing a story that Kushner met with Sergei Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to Washington, in December and allegedly sought a private communications channel with the Kremlin.
Within an hour, television reporters and pundits were declaring it a “bombshell” –their favorite description of anything related to Trump.  No one bothered to point out that nearly every recent president has established and relied on similar back channel contacts.
Notably, President John Kennedy depended on two sets of back channel communications with the Soviets to diffuse the Cuban Missile Crisis in October of 1962.   His brother Bobby Kennedy arranged an urgent deal with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin to remove the missiles in Cuba in exchange for the U.S. removing obsolete missiles in Turkey.  At the same time, the State Department commandeered ABC correspondent John Scali to work out other details with Soviet Embassy official Alexander Fomin.  A catastrophic nuclear exchange was averted.
But nowhere in the hyper-media coverage was this mentioned in the hours after the Kushner story broke.  Only two days later, in an opinion column by David Ignatius, did the Washington Post admit the value of secret contacts when he observed, “Such back channels can add stability and predictability in foreign relations.”  Few in the media have picked up on it.
It makes no difference whether the idea of a private communications channel was broached before or after President Trump took office.  It is a distinction without a difference.  As Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly observed, “It’s both normal, in my opinion, and acceptable.” 
So much for the “bombshell.”  More like a media dud.  Of course, they’ll never admit to it.
The Logan Act Charade
Because the Kushner meeting occurred after Trump was elected but before he took office, the media continues to claim that the Logan Act was violated.  Passed in 1799, it prohibits private citizens from interfering in diplomatic disputes with foreign governments.  Surely, Kushner violated that law, the media exclaimed.
But no one has ever been prosecuted under the Logan Act.  Therefore, it is legally inoperable because it has remained dormant for more than two centuries.  Prosecutors are not allowed to use a statute that has fallowed for such a long period of time.  In other words, it is dead.  It sits on the books of our criminal codes only as words collecting dust.  Nothing more.
Even if it was somehow germane and valid, Kushner was not acting as a private citizen as the Act requires.  He was serving as a representative of the incoming administration.  Other presidents have had discussions with foreign governments before taking office, including President Obama.
Yet the media seems oblivious to both the law and its application.
Security Clearance Form
The media continues to speculate that Kushner committed a crime by omitting his Russian meetings when he filled out his security clearance forms.  But the press almost never mentions that people are rarely prosecuted because it is exceedingly difficult to demonstrate that it was “knowingly falsified or concealed,” as the law demands.  
Have you ever seen one of these forms?  They are long and confusing.  Few people manage to fill them out correctly or completely.
Since violation is not a strict liability crime, the feds would have to prove “specific intent.”  That is, Kushner tried to deliberately deceive the government.  Incomplete paper work, by itself, is not a criminal act.
Significantly, the day after Kushner submitted his form, his attorney alerted the FBI it was in error and would be amended to include several meetings with foreign officials.  These circumstances hardly constitute a crime.  Immediate notification of a filing mistake vitiates any legal culpability.
But, again, journalists seem to conveniently overlook this.  The story is too good to let the facts get in the way.  
Kushner Not a “Target”   
Media madness switched gears into overdrive when it was reported that Kushner is a focus by the FBI in their Russian investigation.  But what does that really mean?
It means, quite simply, the Bureau would like to speak with him about his meetings with Russian officials.  It does not necessarily imply there is a scintilla of evidence that he committed any crimes.  If the feds had such evidence, he would have received a “target letter” as Justice Department rules require.
The media tends to forget (or not realize) that it is not a crime to talk with a Russian, including an ambassador.  After all, it is Kislyak’s job to meet as frequently as possible with current and incoming government officials.  Does he endeavor to influence those people and our government’s policies?  Of course.  That’s why he’s stationed in Washington.  Our ambassador in Moscow serves the same function.  It’s called diplomacy and advocacy.
Kushner also met with a Russian banker, Sergey Gorkov, the head of Vnesheconombank, which is the subject of U.S. sanctions.  Such a meeting, by itself, does not violate the sanctions order nor is it a crime.
Neither is it a crime to collude with a foreign government to influence an election.  As I explained in a recent column, there is no criminal statute prohibiting it.  President Trump insists there was no collusion.  But even if there was, it is not unlawful.
The lawyer for Jared Kushner says he is prepared to answer any and all questions.  Perhaps when he does, he will expose the media for its slanted coverage and hyperbolic headlines.  
The media deserves a good mugging.    
Gregg Jarrett is a Fox News Anchor and former defense attorney.

Trump views Germany as political opponent: senior SPD lawmaker


U.S. President Donald Trump has made clear with his latest tweet that he views Germany as a political opponent, said a senior German lawmaker from the Social Democrats, junior partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition.
“Donald Trump makes clear with his tweet that he views Germany as a political opponent,” Thomas Oppermann, head of the Social Democrats’ (SPD) parliamentary group, told reporters on Tuesday.
Trump criticised Germany earlier on Tuesday for its trade surplus and military spending levels, a day after Merkel rammed home her doubts about the reliability of the United States as an ally.
In his tweet, Trump said: “We have a MASSIVE trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay FAR LESS than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for U.S. This will change.”

CartoonsDemsRinos