Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Reuters/Ipsos: Only Michelle Obama Bests Trump as an Alternative to Biden

Poll: Michelle Obama Only One Who Beats Trump

 


Former first lady Michelle Obama is the only hypothetical presidential candidate alternative that can beat presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, a post-debate Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

Not only is Michelle Obama the only hypothetical alternative who beats Trump in polling, but she also tops the charts in favorability among registered voters, with Trump and President Joe Biden trailing her by more than 10 percentage points each.

Obama reportedly has had no interest in running for office, but calls for Biden stepping out of the race are reaching a fever pitch after his debate performance last week.

Nearly 60% agree Biden should drop out of the race – that included about 33% of Democrats – according to the poll.

Michelle Obama earned support from 50% of registered voters, while just 39% say they would vote for Trump.

All other hypothetical Democratic candidates either perform similarly to or worse than Biden against Trump:

  • Vice President Kamala Harris loses by 1 point 43%-42%.
  • California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom loses by 3 points 42%-39%.
  • All other hypothetical Democrat candidates earn between 34%-39% of registered voters.

Biden and Trump faced off in a televised debate last Thursday, where Biden stammered throughout and failed to challenge Trump's attacks.

The poll found 83% of Democrats and 97% of Republicans agreed with a statement that, in the debate, "Biden stumbled and appeared to show his age." Only 58% of Democrats and 11% of Republicans had the same assessment of Trump's debate performance.

Still the poll is favorable to the incumbent president, as Biden pulled even with Trump even in the face of the debate, a sign the contest remains close.

Biden and Trump each had 40% support among registered voters in the two-day poll that concluded Tuesday. A prior Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted June 11-12 showed Trump with a marginal 2 percentage point lead 41%-39%.

One in five registered voters said they were not sure for whom to vote, that they would pick a different candidate or that they would not vote at all.

The latest poll did not include a question on support for independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The June poll found that 10% of registered voters would back him if he appeared on the ballot.

While nationwide surveys give important signals on American support for political candidates, just a handful of competitive states typically tilt the balance in the U.S. Electoral College, which ultimately decides who wins a presidential election.

Both candidates carry significant liabilities. For Biden, these include concerns about his age – 81 – that were magnified by his debate performance.

The poll, which gathered responses online and nationwide from 1,070 U.S. adults, had a plus or minus 3.5 percentage point margin of error for registered voters, many of whom remain on the fence with about four months left before the Nov. 5 election.

Eric Mack

Eric Mack has been a writer and editor at Newsmax since 2016. He is a 1998 Syracuse University journalism graduate and a New York Press Association award-winning writer.

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

'Shame on the White House Press Corps': Former NY Times Editor Blasts Media for Journalistic Failure

It almost reads like an article from RedState, but it’s not—instead, it’s an op-ed published Tuesday in Semafor by Jill Abramson, former executive editor of the once-august New York Times, and in it, she absolutely shreds the complicit corporate media complex for failing to uncover the truth about Joe Biden’s mental condition. That cover-up was blown wide open last Thursday by the president’s erratic, disturbing performance during what may go down as one of the most infamous debates in history.

Abramson, who served as executive editor at The Gray Lady from 2011 to 2014, was brutal in her analysis of the stain that this abject journalistic failure will leave on the Fourth Estate:

It’s clear the best news reporters in Washington have failed in the first duty of journalism: to hold power accountable. It is our duty to poke through White House smoke screens and find out the truth. The Biden White House clearly succeeded in a massive cover-up of the degree of the President’s feebleness and his serious physical decline, which may be simply the result of old age. Shame on the White House press corps for not to have pierced the veil of secrecy surrounding the President.

Wow. That is a 1,000 percent, dead on target, hittin’ the bullseye admission. Shame. She rightly filets the White House for the massive cover-up effort but also shreds the media for not having pierced “the veil of secrecy."

My only criticism of her opening paragraph is that I wouldn’t necessarily call it a "failure"—the journalistic lack of effort was entirely on purpose, carried out by corrupt fanatics who care more about their progressive ideology than they do the future and safety of this country. They mostly succeeded in that mission—until now.

The failure was widespread; most of the “legendary” journalists and outlets of the modern age were nowhere to be found over the last three and a half years (unless they were bashing Donald Trump).


Missing in Action

Watergate Journo Bob Woodward Belatedly Sounds the Alarm on Biden—Debate Was a 'Political Hydrogen Bomb'

Watergate Hero Carl Bernstein Confirms Biden’s Condition, Unintentionally Confirms Complicity to Hide It

STUNNER: NY Times Editorial Board Calls on Biden to Leave Presidential Race 'to Serve His Country'


Abramson continued, saying what everyone who’s watched the press and the White House lie to us over and over and over has been thinking:

It is simply astounding for the entire country, including its most seasoned reporters, to be as shocked as everyone was by the ugly and painful reality of Biden’s debate performance.

And it is laughable and immoral for Democrats to blame the press now for over-reacting to that reality. The reports of how bad Biden was are certainly not exaggerated. Nor are the reports of Democrats in panic.

While I applaud Abramson’s choice to finally tell the truth, I wonder where she—and the New York Times Editorial Board, and Woodward, and Bernstein, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, etc., etc.—have been all this time. Where the hell were you? Outlets like RedState were right here all along, bringing you reality.

The answer: they were there all along, too, and they knew the truth—they just didn’t want you to know it. 

Excellent piece, Ms. Abramson, but it would have been even better three and a half years ago when Biden’s mental issues were already patently obvious. 


They lied to us for years, despite what we could see with our own eyes. Don't rely on them—we told you all along what was happening, and we didn't mince words. 

If you're getting your information from the legacy corporate media, you're not actually getting the news. 

One way we bring you the truth and escape the Censorship Police is through our VIP program.

Consider becoming a member today; you'll not only be supporting independent journalism, but you'll also get access to VIP stories, videos, and content not available to non-members—and most importantly IMHO, you'll get to participate in our raucous discussion boards.

Remember that a Gold-level account gets you access to all of our sister sites in Townhall Media: PJ Media, Twitchy, Hot Air, Bearing Arms, and Townhall.com.

If you're already a VIP member, all of us here at RedState are deeply grateful for your support. If you'd like to do more, you can give someone a gift membership (you just need their email address).

Use code SAVEAMERICA for a mighty 50% discount. Thank you for participating in the fight for truth at this crucial time!

 

Dark Tech, Dark Harvest: Categorizing the Democrats’ Hidden Tech Network

This article is the 16th installment of the VICI Report, a comprehensive multi-part series exploring the sophisticated use of technology in political operations.  This series aims to uncover the processes, mechanisms, tools, and technologies used by Democrats to master our political processes and to develop strategies that answer and ultimately defeat their manipulations in 2024 and beyond.

Read the previous article in this series, Long March Through Venture Capital, where we expose the Venture Capital industry as one of the major drivers of Democrat technology dominance, or start from the beginning of our series.

Introduction

The Democrat tech ecosystem is a meticulously crafted network, integrating advanced technology, big data, and grassroots activism to create a formidable political machine. Over the past few decades, left-wing ideologies have permeated venture capital and corporate finance, embedding Critical Theory, ESG, and DEI into the core of business operations. This ideological infiltration has transformed traditional profit-driven motives into vehicles for social engineering, compelling companies to adopt leftist agendas to secure essential investments.

As the tech industry became a battleground for ideological control, early principles like Google's "Don't be evil" have morphed into frameworks like Effective Altruism, justifying extreme measures under the guise of social good. Simultaneously, the influx of cheap money and global investment strategies have detached valuations from reality, creating inefficiencies and fostering internal social agitation within companies.

Understanding the intricate collaboration within this ecosystem is crucial for comprehending its political prowess. From big data analytics to digital grassroots mobilization, the Democrat tech ecosystem exemplifies a sophisticated approach to influencing voter behavior and election outcomes, revealing both its strategic brilliance and its potential pitfalls.

Synergy of Interests and Roles

The Democrat tech ecosystem is a highly interconnected network where numerous companies and projects collaborate seamlessly. This integration allows for efficient data sharing, strategic planning, and execution of political campaigns. The collective effort of these entities creates a robust infrastructure that maximizes voter engagement and turnout, demonstrating the power of coordinated strategy and advanced technology.

A key aspect of this ecosystem is its integration with traditional non-profits through their data and technology vendors. Non-profits focused on social justice issues, for example, may use advanced data analytics tools to identify and engage potential supporters. The data from these non-profits, though not overtly political, can be used to enhance the efforts of ballot harvesting non-profits or Democrat campaigns due to shared, politically aligned vendors. 

A person receptive to a local-centric environmental group is more likely to be receptive to Democrat politics, making this indirect collaboration a critical component. This alignment amplifies the ecosystem's impact by leveraging the shared technology and data of these vendors.

Big Tech corporations play a crucial role in this ecosystem in multiple ways. Companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter provide platforms and tools that support Democrat political strategies. While these companies have "banned" political advertising and officially ceased providing political campaigns with the same quality data they previously offered, they now supply this data to Democrat-aligned non-profits for GOTV and other voter contact canvassing. 

This approach was exemplified by Zuckerberg's $400 million contribution in 2020, which was largely used for these purposes. Additionally, Big Tech companies allow aligned developers to take leaves of absence to work on political tech projects, with stipends often funded by Impact Investment advisors like Arabella Partners. This process aligns with the ideological infiltration and takeover across all educated professions, further integrating Big Tech into the Democrat tech ecosystem.

The collaboration within this ecosystem extends beyond direct partnerships. The scope of the ecosystem involves data and activity from various vendors at different stages feeding into each other. This allows billions of dollars of investment capital and non-profit donation capital to play a role in the Democrat ballot harvesting machine without "hard" money being spent or otherwise trackable. 

Media organizations shape public opinion, tech startups develop innovative tools for political engagement, and educational institutions cultivate the next generation of tech-savvy activists. The seamless integration of these roles and interests enhances the overall effectiveness of the Democrat tech ecosystem, making it a powerful force in shaping political outcomes.

Moreover, this type of collaboration raises significant legal and ethical concerns. The intertwining of non-profit and political campaign activities, facilitated by shared vendors and aligned interests, might be illegal and warrants thorough investigation by law enforcement. The potential misuse of non-profit status, the blending of tax-deductible donations with political operations, and the covert flow of data and resources across aligned entities demand rigorous scrutiny. Understanding the synergy within this ecosystem reveals the strategic sophistication behind Democrat political operations and underscores the urgent need for accountability and transparency in these practices.

Big Data and the Voter

The use of big data tools and technologies is central to Democrat political campaigns today. These tools enable detailed voter profiling, allowing campaigns to tailor their messages to specific demographics with pinpoint accuracy. Data collection methods include social media analytics, voter databases, and online behavior tracking, which together provide a comprehensive view of potential voters. By analyzing this data, campaigns can identify trends, preferences, and behaviors, creating highly targeted outreach strategies that significantly increase voter engagement and turnout.

One of the striking similarities between Democrat digital campaigning and modern business practice is the use of profile marketing and customer relationship management (CRM) techniques. In the business world, companies use data-driven strategies to manage customer interactions, segmenting and targeting customers based on detailed profiles and driving customers toward desired responses. Democrat campaigns have adopted these techniques to manage voter interactions in a similar manner. By applying data-driven approaches, these campaigns efficiently allocate resources, prioritize outreach efforts, and craft messages that resonate deeply with their targeted voter segments.

Sales management pipelines, a staple in business operations, have their counterparts in political campaigns. Voter data is segmented and targeted similarly to sales prospects, with campaigns using sophisticated data analytics to prioritize outreach efforts and maximize impact. This approach allows campaigns to focus on high-value targets, ensuring that their efforts are both efficient and effective. By mirroring sales management pipelines, Democrats streamline their operations and improve their overall efficiency.

The promise of personalized marketing, a key component of early internet ambitions, has been fully realized in the political realm through data-driven manipulation. Campaigns craft personalized propaganda based on detailed voter profiles derived from data available from social media titans, ensuring that their messages resonate with individual voters. This approach leverages big data insights to influence voter behavior on an individual level. Personalized propaganda is crafted to address the specific concerns and interests of individual voters, making campaign messages more persuasive and impactful.

Big data tools and technologies also play a crucial role in the broader Democrat tech ecosystem by enabling the integration and coordination of various campaign activities. The data collected from different sources is used to create a cohesive strategy that spans multiple platforms and outreach efforts. This integration allows campaigns to maintain a consistent message and approach across all channels, enhancing the overall effectiveness of their efforts.

This seamless integration of data-driven strategies with campaign activities extends to the grassroots level, where digital tools empower activists and volunteers. By understanding the role of big data in shaping voter interactions, we can better appreciate the strategic depth of the Democrat tech ecosystem and its ability to leverage advanced technologies to achieve its political objectives. Activists use these tools to drive digital grassroots efforts, creating a powerful feedback loop that further amplifies campaign effectiveness.

Activists, Tools, and the Digital Grassroots

Digital tools play a crucial role in grassroots activism, serving as both inputs and outputs within the broader data and voter management efforts of Democrat political campaigns. These tools collect valuable data from activist actions and feed it back into the system, refining and enhancing overall strategy. This feedback loop ensures that campaigns remain agile and responsive to changing dynamics, continuously optimizing their efforts.

The Democrats have mastered the use of these digital tools to create a CRM-style pipeline that attracts and manages like-minded, activist-minded individuals. By organizing activities ranging from event promotion to complex street canvassing, these tools ensure coordination and impact. Activists receive real-time updates and instructions, allowing campaigns to mobilize quickly and efficiently. Leveraging these digital platforms, Democrat campaigns can strategically direct efforts, maximizing the effectiveness of grassroots initiatives.

Campaigns use these digital tools to direct and reap benefits from activist actions, whether it involves simple tasks like event promotion and fundraising or more complex efforts like personalized local street canvassing. Personalized engagement plans and targeted interaction scripts are crucial in this process. Activists are provided with detailed voter profiles and contact histories, enabling them to engage voters in informed and persuasive conversations. This approach enhances the effectiveness of both traditional door-to-door canvassing and digital outreach, ensuring every interaction is meaningful and impactful.

The ability to individualize outreach and activism at scale using technology represents a significant advancement in political campaigning. Traditional canvassing methods are now complemented by digital techniques that allow for more efficient and personalized voter contact. Canvassers can access individual profiles and contact histories on their phones, integrate voter data into relational graphs for instant analysis, and optimize their routes to avoid wasting time on already convinced or impossible-to-convince voters. This integration of traditional and modern methods significantly enhances the reach and efficiency of campaign efforts.

The synergy between technology and grassroots activism within the Democrat tech ecosystem generates a powerful dynamic. Activist actions produce valuable data that continuously refines campaign strategies, ensuring every effort is optimized for maximum impact. This strategic sophistication enables the Democrat tech ecosystem to leverage grassroots activism effectively, achieving its political objectives through coordinated and data-driven efforts. By harnessing the power of digital tools, Democrats have created a formidable grassroots operation that not only mobilizes support efficiently but also adapts swiftly to changing political landscapes.

Collusion and the Harvest

The Democrat tech ecosystem extends its influence through a complex network of non-profit organizations and strategic alliances, effectively transferring the responsibility for voter turnout from traditional campaign operations to the non-profit ecosystem. This strategy allows campaigns to channel vast resources into voter mobilization efforts without breaching campaign finance laws. By leveraging the legal and financial structures of non-profits, Democrats have crafted a sophisticated approach to ensuring voter engagement and turnout.

Effective Altruism, which emphasizes quantifiable results, drives many of these non-profit-based strategies. Organizations focused on voter turnout and engagement adopt this principle to ensure their efforts are both efficient and measurable. This data-driven approach allows them to demonstrate tangible outcomes, attracting more funding and support. The focus on quantifiable impact ensures that every dollar spent directly contributes to increasing voter participation.

The ballot harvesting process, a cornerstone of Democrat voter mobilization strategy, necessitates a holistic collusive effort. This involves integrating data management, activist mobilization, and strategic planning to ensure ballots are collected and submitted effectively. By aligning these efforts, Democrats can systematically harvest ballots, maximizing voter turnout in key areas. The coordination between various entities, from local activists to national non-profits, creates a seamless operation that ensures every possible vote is counted.

The success of Democrat strategies in ballot harvesting is evident in historical and contemporary election outcomes. Leveraging advanced technology and coordinated efforts, Democrats have refined their processes to dominate voter turnout. Strategic use of data, coupled with grassroots mobilization, has created a powerful system that enhances their electoral advantage.

However, this intricate web of collaboration and strategic alignment raises significant legal and ethical questions. The blending of non-profit activities with direct political campaigning, facilitated by shared data and resources, might skirt or even violate campaign finance laws. The covert flow of funds and data through aligned entities demands rigorous scrutiny to ensure transparency and accountability. Law enforcement must investigate these practices to uphold the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that campaign finance regulations are not being subverted.

Understanding the depth and complexity of the Democrat tech ecosystem's approach to voter turnout reveals the sophistication of their strategies. By integrating non-profit operations with political campaigns, Democrats have created a formidable machine for mobilizing voters. This strategic alignment, while effective, necessitates careful examination to ensure it operates within legal and ethical boundaries. 

Democrat Technology Categories

The Democrat tech ecosystem is a multifaceted network, strategically designed to maximize political influence and voter engagement. To fully understand its complexity, it is essential to categorize its components. This categorization not only provides clarity but also sets the stage for detailed analyses of each category in subsequent articles. The Democrat tech ecosystem can be described in five broad categories: Data and Research, Voter Relationship Management, Activist Marshalling, Finance and Fundraising, and Ballot Harvesting. Each category plays a crucial role in the overall strategy, and understanding them is key to comprehending the ecosystem's full impact.

Data and Research

Data and research form the backbone of the Democrat tech ecosystem. This category encompasses the tools and methodologies used for gathering and analyzing voter data. Advanced data analytics, social media monitoring, and voter databases allow campaigns to gain deep insights into voter behavior, preferences, and trends. By understanding these patterns, campaigns can craft targeted messages and strategies that resonate with specific demographics. The ability to predict voter behavior and tailor outreach efforts accordingly is crucial for effective voter engagement and mobilization.

Voter Relationship Management

Voter Relationship Management (VRM) is akin to Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in the business world. This category involves managing interactions with voters, maintaining detailed profiles, and tracking engagement over time. VRM tools help campaigns stay connected with voters, ensuring continuous communication and relationship building. By leveraging these tools, campaigns can personalize their outreach, making voters feel valued and heard. 

Activist Marshaling

Activist marshaling focuses on organizing and mobilizing grassroots supporters. Digital tools play a significant role in this category, creating a CRM-style pipeline to attract and manage activists. These tools help coordinate activities ranging from event promotion to street canvassing, ensuring that every effort is impactful. Personalized engagement plans and real-time updates enhance the efficiency of activist efforts, making grassroots campaigns more effective. 

Finance and Fundraising

Securing financial resources is vital for any political campaign, and this category includes the tools and techniques used to raise funds and manage campaign finances. Democrat-aligned non-profits, PACs, and other fundraising entities work together to channel funds into campaign-related efforts. This category addresses the differing requirements for managing small donors and potential investor-grade donors, integrating these diverse streams into a cohesive strategy. Digital platforms facilitate online fundraising, social media campaigns, and donor management. 

Ballot Harvesting

Ballot harvesting is the process of collecting and submitting absentee or mail-in ballots on behalf of voters. This category involves strategies and tools used to ensure high voter turnout. By coordinating data management, activist mobilization, and strategic planning, campaigns and aligned activists systematically collect ballots and ensure they are counted. As the culmination of the entire ecosystem's processes and mechanics, ballot harvesting exemplifies the holistic nature of Democrat strategies. The tools facilitating this culminative process include advanced data analytics, coordinated activist efforts, and robust logistical planning. 

Conclusion

The Democrat tech ecosystem is a sophisticated, interconnected network designed to maximize political influence and voter engagement. By categorizing this ecosystem into these segments, we can better understand its complexity and effectiveness. Each category plays a crucial role in creating a seamless operation that leverages advanced technology and coordinated efforts to achieve strategic political objectives.

In subsequent articles, we will explore the tools, players, and processes that drive each segment of this ecosystem. These detailed analyses will reveal the intricate mechanisms that make the Democrat tech ecosystem a powerful force in modern politics. Understanding how these components work together is essential for grasping the full scope of their influence on voter behavior and election outcomes. Be sure to read the following articles to gain a comprehensive understanding of these critical elements.

Sinistra Delenda Est!

In the next installment of the VICI Report series, we expose Democrats’ Data and Research vendors, their capabilities, and how they bridge the collusion gap between Big Tech and Democrat campaigns.

The VICI Report and Project VICI are projects of UpHold America, led by Paul Porter (X:@PaulPorterPVB) and Jason Belich (X:@BelichJason). 

The VICI Report series is a culmination of many months of sleepless nights; the product of exhaustive research and analysis into the technologies used in politics by a Democrat adversary excessively skilled at manipulating political outcomes. Your support is critical to the success of this mission. Please visit our website, support our GiveSendGo, or join our Substack to contribute.

 

Here's the Sentence That Perfectly Describes the Biden White House Right Now

 

Alex Thompson - Axios
 Axios’ Alex Thompson

summarized this piece succinctly: “Democrats are in disarray.” After last Thursday night’s disastrous debate, Thompson went on CNN to explain how this is the Biden the White House has tried to hide from the public. Every time someone inquired about the president’s mental health, it was met with gaslighting and deflection. 

Every pivot the White House probably had primed to go this cycle got torched in 90 minutes last week, setting off a panic among Democrats unseen in years. Some want Biden gone; others are reportedly asking for donation refunds. Aides at the White House have also been leaking details about the president, notably that he’s only semi-functional between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. The latest report shouldn't shock anyone—“everyone is freaking the f**k out.”  It's the perfect sentence to describe the chaos. Yet, the official that arrogantly said that the same people panicking will be the ones asking for Christmas party invitations also captures the other side of this campaign: they truly think they’re going to win (via Axios) [emphasis mine]: 

Quotes like this are really harmful to President Biden. The campaign and WH is filled with brilliant, thoughtful, dedicated people who are working their asses off. This just sounds petty, vindictive and childish. https://t.co/1f9rcQEEJ6

— Tommy Vietor (@TVietor08) July 3, 2024

Biden's performance at the debate has left many of his own aides worried about his mental fitness, and angry about what they see as a lack of candor from Biden's senior aides. 

"It's the first topic of every conversation," one White House official said. "Senior leadership has given us nothing. To act like it's business as usual is delusional."

Another official put it more bluntly: "Everyone is freaking the f*** out." 

"The uncertainty after Thursday is palpable and anxiety is only increasing," a third White House official told Axios. 

"People are looking for leadership and direction that they were told to trust, and hoped was there, but aren't yet feeling in what is now clearly a defining moment for this presidency." 

[…] 

Part of Biden's team sees the debate as just one bad night that will blow over, and points out that many of the president's critics previously have counted him out when he faced challenges. 

One longtime Biden aide told Axios: "Davos Dems love to hedge their bets against us and get hysterical, like they did in 2019. And just like after 2020, they will come back with their DNC convention lanyards in their hands, begging for Christmas party invitations and then for a plus-one." 

…Axios granted several Biden officials anonymity to describe the atmosphere in the White House and on the campaign in the days since the debate. 

One Biden confidante told Axios: "For everyone who really cares about Biden and his legacy, the debate was just painful to watch." 

"It's dark," said an official involved in the campaign. "It feels like there is zero leadership or information… 

A rebound for Obama after his poor debate with Mitt Romney in 2012 was expected, and we could believe that it would happen since the 44th president had political skill. He also wasn’t 1,000 years old like Biden. The skeleton of this presidency is that the Delaware liberal, who led an unremarkable career and only ascended to the vice presidency because a younger, more talented Democrat picked him as his running mate, was never built to lead the country. Obama knew it. A global pandemic and the exposure of a dreadfully shallow 2020 Democratic field allowed Biden to “win” the 2020 election.

Even his closest aides credited the pandemic with the 2020 results. Biden likely would have been trounced by Trump, who was at the helm of a booming economy that was derailed by the pandemic and whose mental and physical limitations might have been laid bare if he had been forced to campaign publicly under normal circumstances.

Democrats are propping up a candidate they never truly liked or felt was a legitimate frontrunner, whose declining mental health and age have left them trapped in a no-win situation. Biden was never made of presidential timber when he was younger. It’s even more apparent now. You can’t spin or polish someone who was never it, and it’s far too late for Democrats to do anything about it. 

Welcome to hell, liberal America.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

CNN's Harry Enten Had Another Brutal Assessment for the Biden Campaign

Harry Enten forecasts the fight for Congress - YouTube

CNN’s Harry Enten is the canary in the coal mine for the Biden campaign that has yet to realize they’re on the precipice of total political disaster. In multiple donor calls, memos, and fundraising emails, the Biden operation has taken a stoic, and some could argue insane, approach to putting out fires among the Democratic Party’s donor class. Some top donors reportedly inquired about refunds, while others wanted Biden officials to be receptive to their concerns about the president’s mental health. The Biden team accommodated neither, but Enten added that these issues should be the primary focus for a campaign teetering on defeat.

Enten told CNN’s Anderson Cooper that polling on Biden’s capacity to be president isn’t even on the same planet as it was four years ago. After Trump demolished Biden, 72 percent of Americans feel he’s too old to be president, up from 65 percent pre-debate. It was only 36 percent in 2020. 

Re: Biden's age/mental acuity in the voters' minds. The numbers are worse than pre-debate, which were historically bad. Far worse than 2020 when age actually wasn't a big issue to voters.

The comparison to Reagan is total bunk.

Unsure how Biden wins if #s don't vastly improve pic.twitter.com/46nP2gPEYf

— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) July 2, 2024

The CNN data cruncher was blunt in that he didn’t see how Biden would win if these figures continued to be this poor for the president. He also torched a counternarrative from liberals regarding Ronald Reagan, who didn’t have a good first debate in the 1984 election. He bounced back in the second, but the baseline isn’t close. Just 27 percent of Americans felt in 1984 that Reagan was too old to be president, and that was after the first debate.

Reagan got the benefit of the doubt from voters, but Enten doesn’t see it with Biden, who arguably had a worse performance. He’s also not the only one asking how to win when three-fourths of the country thinks you’ve lost it. Sam Stein tweeted that he didn’t mean to be “glib” but wondered how Biden could win re-election with figures like this. 

You probably can’t unless you cheat.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Elon Musk Calls Out VP Harris For 'Lying' About Trump's Abortion Stance On X

US-SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-COMPUTERS-TRANSPORT-TUNNEL-BORING-MUSK
Elon Musk, co-founder and chief executive officer of Tesla Inc., speaks during an unveiling event for the Boring Company Hawthorne test tunnel in Hawthorne, south of Los Angeles, California on December 18, 2018. - Musk explained that the snail moves 14 times faster than a tunnel-digging machine. On Tuesday night December 18, 2018, Boring Co. officially opened the Hawthorne tunnel, a preview of Elon Musk's larger vision to ease L.A. traffic. (Photo by Robyn Beck / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

X owner Elon Musk called out Vice President Kamala Harris for “lying” about former President Trump’s position on a national abortion ban in an online post.

On Sunday, Harris posted on her X (Twitter) account, saying that Trump “would ban abortion nationwide” and that she and President Biden will do “everything” in their “power to stop him and restore women’s reproductive freedom.”

However, her post was flagged by X with a community note, which is essentially the same as a “fact-check,” stating: “President Trump has repeatedly said he will not sign a national abortion ban.”

Musk then reposted Harris’ post, saying: “When will politicians, or at least the intern who runs their account, learn that lying on this platform doesn’t work anymore?”

Despite calls for a nationwide ban on abortion from certain Republicans, Trump has stated that he will not implement one and will instead leave state-level regulation of the procedure in place.

“I put three great Supreme Court justices on the court, and they happened to vote in favor of killing Roe v. Wade and moving it back to the states,” Trump said at the first debate with Biden on Thursday. “Now the states are working it out.”

He continued, adding that he believes abortion should be allowed in cases of rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother.

“What happened is that we brought it back to the states, and the country is now coming together on this issue. It’s been a great thing,” he added.

Biden responded by saying that if he was elected back into office, he would restore Roe v. Wade. 

“The idea that states are able to do this is a little like saying, ‘We’re going to turn civil rights back to the states; let each state have a different rule,’” Biden said.

The vice president has spearheaded Biden-Harris campaign tactics to consistently accuse Trump of being responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade in June 2022, even though that decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court. During his tenure in the White House, Trump nominated three conservative justices to the Supreme Court, which resulted in a 6-3 decision to overturn the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

“Elon Musk, who is in discussions for a role in a Trump d̶i̶c̶t̶a̶t̶o̶r̶s̶h̶i̶p̶ White House, is using the platform he overpaid for to lie to Twitter followers (yeah, we ain’t calling it X),” the campaign claimed in a press release.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

 

BBC's David Aaronovitch Suggests That Biden Have Trump Killed: 'Threat To America's Security'

A prominent British BBC presenter has sparked controversy after saying that President Joe Biden ought to have former President Donald Trump murdered before the 2024 election.

As a presenter of Radio 4’s “Briefing Room” show, David Aaronovitch prompted backlash with an X (Twitter) post that has since been deleted.

The post read: “If I was Biden, I’d hurry up and have Trump murdered on the basis that he is a threat to America’s security.”

While using the hashtag #SCOTUS, Aaronovitch related his online remark to the Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold presidential immunity.

Other social media users chimed in on the now-deleted post, with one X user commenting: “I love how Brits pretend to look down on & feel sorry for Americans, yet they can’t stop talking about us and they’re fixated on the U.S. so much more than any of us are towards them.”

In relation to the post, Trump was recently given immunity for all “official acts” committed while he was president by the 6-3 decision. However, the ruling did not specify exactly what constituted as an “official act.”

There was a great deal of opposition to Aaronovitch’s tweet, with many accusing him of violating the employee impartiality policies of his employer.

Clearly dissatisfied with the incoming reactions to his first post, he deleted it soon after and posted a follow-up X tweet in which he explained that he had removed it because social media users apparently mistook it for a call to violence instead of a comedic take.

Alex Armstrong, a contributor to GB News, accused him of “backtracking” on the counsel of his media “handlers.” Aaronovitch then responded, saying: “Ooh Alex, tell me about my ‘handlers,'” but he remained firm and unrepentant about his remark.

The BBC did not comment on Aaronovitch’s X post.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

 

CartoonDems