Thursday, July 4, 2024

Trump Allies Intensify Harris Attacks as Biden Replacement Talk Builds

 



Donald Trump's campaign and some of his allies have launched a preemptive political strike on Vice President Kamala Harris, moving swiftly to try to discredit her amid talk among some of her fellow Democrats that she might replace President Joe Biden atop the party's 2024 presidential ticket.

On social media and in a flurry of statements over the past 48 hours, Trump's campaign and his Republican allies appear to be laying the groundwork for an all-out assault on Harris should the 81-year-old Biden decide to end his reelection bid following his feeble debate performance last week.

While Biden has insisted he is not quitting the race four months before the Nov. 5 election, and Harris has stood firmly behind him, the Trump campaign has little to lose by attacking the vice president now, so that if Harris does emerge as the nominee, she might do so in a weakened state.

Republicans have regularly criticized Harris, 59, during Biden's term in office, but the attacks this week represented a sharp and seemingly coordinated escalation that appeared to be linked to increased talk about her possibly replacing Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.

The National Republican Congressional Committee, which oversees House Republican races, called her Biden's "enabler in chief."

MAGA Inc., a fundraising super PAC supporting Trump, meanwhile released a statement calling her the "invasion czar." In March 2021 Biden said Harris would lead efforts with Mexico and Central American nations to address illegal immigration.

Republicans have since seized on that to accuse her of failing to stem the flow of millions of migrants crossing illegally into the United States, although she was never directly responsible for securing the southern border.

"Kamala Harris is incompetent. She's proven to be the weakest, worst vice president in history, and she has 100% supported Joe Biden in every single disastrous policy that he has implemented over the last four years," said Karoline Leavitt, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign.

The Biden campaign pushed back against the escalating Republican criticism without addressing the question of whether the vice president is waiting in the wings.

"Vice President Harris is proud to be President Biden's running mate," said Rhyan Lake, a campaign spokesperson for Harris. "No matter what false attacks Trump and his extreme allies make, she will continue to defend the Biden-Harris record and prosecute the case against Donald Trump."

The swipes at Harris by Trump's camp were reminiscent of a similar tactic that the Republican Trump, president from 2017-2021, used to successfully undermine Ron DeSantis, his main Republican rival, before the Florida governor jumped into their party's 2024 election primary race last year.

Corey Lewandowski, a longtime Trump adviser, told Reuters Harris was politically vulnerable given her role in addressing illegal immigration, among other issues that are part of extensive research the party has gathered on her record.

Trump's Unusual Silence

A former senior staffer in the Trump White House who is still in contact with the Trump campaign said the newfound emphasis on Harris made sense.

"If Joe Biden stays on top of the ticket, given what we've seen, she takes on even more importance. But if he does step aside, she's the potential candidate. This is about defining her," the staffer said, pointing to her low approval ratings in public opinion polls.

Despite her consistently low approval ratings, a Reuters/Ipsos poll earlier this week showed Harris to be as formidable an opponent to Trump as Biden. In a hypothetical matchup, Trump led Harris by a single percentage point 43%-42%.

The clamor by Trump's allies is in stark contrast with the unusual silence from the normally voluble former president. Since Biden's poor debate performance, Trump has laid low, making few public appearances or public statements.

"This shows a maturation of the candidate himself. You can teach an old dog new tricks. He's showing increased discipline and message control," said a senior adviser to the Trump campaign familiar with internal discussions.

Even before the June 27 debate, the Trump campaign was beginning to turn its attention to Harris, releasing an attack ad online that mocked her for repeating lines in her speeches.

An online meme promoted by Republicans showed Harris repeating the same phrase "unburdened by what has been" again and again in remarks.

Harris' defenders say she has become more of a target because of her leading role in attacking Trump over abortion rights and her vigorous defense of Biden on the campaign trail.

If Biden were to exit the race before the Democratic National Convention in August, there is no guarantee Harris would be the nominee. But as vice president, she likely would be first in line. She would benefit from Biden's immense campaign war chest and likely see a large segment of Democrats rally around her in a bid to avoid a bitter intra-party battle.

And as the first Black vice president in U.S. history, she provides a bridge to the party's most dependable voting bloc. Her background and relative youth would make for a sharp contrast with Trump, 78.


Trump Unleashed: Delivers Savage Golf Course Broadside to 'Pile of C***' Biden, 'Pathetic' Kamala Harris

There's a Trump video going viral Wednesday, and when I first saw it, I wondered if it was a fake—after all, we live in the age of AI and CGI and everything in between, and there are plenty of bad actors who would love nothing more than to fool the public. But the Daily Beast is reporting that it's authentic, and the New York Post and DailyMail are also going with the story, and the Trump campaign is not disputing it. 

In it, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee delivers an absolutely devastating assessment of his rival Joe Biden and his supposed second in command, Vice President Kamala Harris.

Warning: Profanity

 


 This savage takedown will likely be met with cheering approval from Trump fans and paroxysms of outrage from the liberal corporate media and Biden supporters. Joe Biden will soon be out of the race, the former president predicted:

Donald Trump delivered a brutal assessment of Joe Biden’s performance against him in last week’s presidential debate, calling the president a “broken-down pile of crap” teetering on the verge of “quitting the race” in a video provided by a source to The Daily Beast.

“He just quit, you know—he’s quitting the race,” Trump says, sitting in a golf cart. “I got him out of the—and that means we have Kamala.”

Although the video is short, clocking in at 40 seconds, Trump wasn’t done—far from it. If you’re Kamala Harris or Joe Biden, you’re not going to like it:

It was not immediately clear where or when exactly the footage had been covertly filmed.

In the video, the former president asks the person holding the camera what they thought of his own debate performance. As he’s told he did “fantastic” and “amazing,” Trump blusters on flatly, “Look at that old, broken down pile of crap.

“It’s a bad guy,” he says, seemingly referring to Biden. After announcing that the president is quitting and handing the baton to Kamala Harris, Trump continues, “I think she’s gonna be better” as an opponent.

“She’s so bad. She’s so pathetic,” he adds, plucking at his gloves, then appears to say, “She’s so fucking bad.”


The news cycle has not been kind lately to Kamala Harris:

With Biden on the Ropes, Kamala Harris Further Collapses, Leaving Democrats Scrambling

Musk Scorches Kamala Harris Over False Tweet: 'Lying on This Platform Doesn't Work Anymore'

Kamala Harris' Shot at the Presidency Just Got Worse With Cringe Pandering Video at BET Awards


As I mentioned, the Trump campaign was contacted about the video, and they notably did not dispute its authenticity:

Reached for comment on Wednesday evening, Trump campaign spokesperson Stephen Cheung directed The Daily Beast to a statement issued earlier in the day on the “total collapse” of the Democratic Party.

“Every Democrat who is calling on Crooked Joe Biden to quit was once a supporter of Biden and his failed policies that lead to extreme inflation, an open border, and chaos at home and abroad,” read the statement, attributed to campaign advisors Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles.

That certainly does not sound like they’re disavowing the video, but we will wait and see if there's official confirmation. 

Trump is a unique politician, one who refuses to follow the “norms.” Whether you appreciated his delivery or his tone, it’s hard to argue with his assessment. Biden is toast.

 

Remember What Independence Day Is About

It was 248 years ago today that the world found out that the Continental Congress in Philadelphia was really up. Rather than trying to reconcile with England, they decided to break, completely. More than that, these 56 men from all 13 colonies decided to lay out for all the world, and history, to see why it was they chose this path. The idea had been decided earlier, the language labored over, and the printer finally got the finished product to make copies so the colonists could be told what their leaders ultimately decided. It was the debut of the Declaration of Independence.

We revere this document today, but that the time there was nothing close to a guarantee that it would be remembered as anything other than a blip in history; a warning about the dangers of lofty goals in the face of tyranny. 

If we had lost, the signatories would have been hunted down and executed. It’s very likely no copies of the document would have survived – why would King George allow it? Royalty back when royalty ruled were not known for their interest in maintaining a strict record for posterity, even of their enemies and shortcomings, as seen by their subjects. It was much easier to simply wipe it clean and pretend it never happened, except in legend as a cautionary tale should anyone else get a “bug up their butts” about freedom, liberty or independence. 

Keeping copies around could inspire others. This wasn’t the digital age, making copies wasn’t easy or cheap. Things could be wiped from existence.

But the Declaration of Independence was not wiped from existence because we did not lose. As we now face a greater threat to our liberty from within than without, it’s worth rereading that beautiful document on this day, and as the two-and-a-half century anniversary fast approaches, to inspire people to ensure that anniversary of this spirit endures not only 2 more years, but forever. Here is the text and the reason for the celebration of this day.

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America. 

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

It was signed by these men: Delaware: George Read, Caesar Rodney, Thomas McKean. Pennsylvania: George Clymer, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Morris, John Morton, Benjamin Rush, George Ross, James Smith, James Wilson, George Taylor. Massachusetts: John Adams, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry. New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton. Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery. New York: Lewis Morris, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, William Floyd. Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton. Virginia: Richard Henry Lee, Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Jefferson, George Wythe, Thomas Nelson, Jr. North Carolina: William Hooper, John Penn, Joseph Hewes. South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, Thomas Lynch, Jr., Thomas Heyward, Jr. New Jersey: Abraham Clark, John Hart, Francis Hopkinson, Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon. Connecticut: Samuel Huntington, Roger Sherman, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott. Maryland: Charles Carroll, Samuel Chase, Thomas Stone, William Paca.

God bless them, and God bless the United State of America. Happy Independence Day.

Derek Hunter is the host of a free daily podcast (subscribe!) and author of the book, Outrage, INC., which exposes how liberals use fear and hatred to manipulate the masses, and host of the weekly “Week in F*cking Review” podcast where the news is spoken about the way it deserves to be. Follow him on Twitter at @DerekAHunter.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Fixing the Military Requires a Dying Art Called 'Leadership'

On this Independence Day, we all know our military has been shattered into fragments of what it was back in the early 1990s, when it was the undisputed most lethal force on earth and certainly one of the greatest armies in human history. America’s victory in Desert Storm, nearly forgotten by a force now more concerned with the strategic threat allegedly posed by warm weather and with catering to the gender-delusional, was on par with the victories of Hannibal, Alexander, and Caesar. That’s no exaggeration. A Cold War military that spent decades ready to hold the Fulda Gap against the red hordes annihilated a nation’s entire military in 100 hours and barely broke a sweat. But today, our military is a disaster. It can’t win wars and it can’t even convince normal Americans to join or stay very long if they do. This disaster has to be undone, and only a Trump victory can do that. Another Biden term and it’s over, but after President Golem botched the debate we have a good chance of getting Trump 2.0 and a shot at rescuing our men and women in uniform from the Perfumed Princes of the Pentagon.

So, how do you go about fixing the Pentagon? 

You start with leadership. Not just shinier stuff. Not smarter policies. Not better plans. Good, solid, old-fashioned leadership. That’s the key.

Yes, we have terrible procurement problems. Our equipment is aging, and we cannot seem to buy effective new gear for a reasonable price within a reasonable timeframe. And yes, we are a strategic mess, with a senior officer corps that has failed to grapple with our real enemies and instead focuses on the trendy boogeymen that terrify leftist civilian poobahs, like “extremism” and the climate hoax. But the most pressing issue our military faces is cultural. Without morale, and without a laser-focus on winning, you will fail. Our military today is less a military than a huge, woke HR department that occasionally drops bombs. 

War is a people business. Our people are alienated. They feel abused and betrayed because they have been. They sense our strategic drift. They do not trust our uniformed leaders, and not unreasonably. The generals’ and admirals’ grotesque betrayal of the troops during COVID was a disaster, but that was only one of many failures. Getting our troops killed in Kabul – with no accountability for the people in charge might I add – was another. Whoever put our magnificent warriors at Abbey Gate under those conditions should be making big rocks into little rocks at Leavenworth, not enjoying a cush retirement gig on the board of some outfit like Boeing.

But heaven forbid a trooper misplace his M4 – now that’s a real crisis!

We need real military leadership again, starting at the top. We need a new commander-in-chief, but we also need a new Secretary of Defense, one who leads our military instead of managing it. He cannot be a bureaucrat cloistered in a fancy office in the Pentagon and hope to fix this mess. The Secretary of Defense, though a civilian, is in the chain of command, so he should command. He must get his intent out there in no uncertain terms. He must expect that his orders reforming the military be swiftly and efficiently carried out. And he must nuke any resistance he gets without hesitation or mercy.

A commander who doesn’t command is no commander. He’s a joke, a clown, a Vindman. We’ve had far too many of them in the officer corps for far too long.

The next Secretary of Defense must be a veteran, someone who has commanded soldiers in uniform. Certainly, the task facing the next Trump SecDef is a bit more complex than that of a new company or battalion commander taking command, but the principles of leadership are the same. You take “command.” You don’t take “suggestion.” You don’t take “go along, get along.” You take command.

You get one chance to set the tone. Go in soft, and ramping up is nearly impossible when you find people are not doing what you direct. Go in hard. Firm. Clear. Not jerky, not obnoxious. Too often bad leaders mistake angry and mean for clear and firm. The troops want a commander who takes charge and sets out a clear and commonsense intent to accomplish the mission. He must give the orders – not suggestions – to move the military toward his objective, a lethal combat-oriented force. The new SecDef needs to do that on Day One.

How does this work in practice? What does it look like at the Pentagon on Day One of the Second Trump administration? 

He must immediately re-establish that the United States Armed Forces is a military organization and will function as such. This is a resource-tight environment – there’s no time or money for fluff or nonsense. Anything that does not go toward deterring or destroying America’s enemies must go. That’s the guiding principle, and he must take steps to implement that by making unequivocal changes to the current regime.

First, get rid of DEI. It’s done, over, gone. No more “X Month,” not more babble about how “diversity is our strength.” Our strength is our strength, meaning our ability to kill the enemy. The diversity pap posters come down, the civilian DEI personnel are terminated as excess, and any uniformed personnel in DEI slots are reassigned to real jobs. This will be accomplished in seven days; each joint chief will report personally to the SecDef that it has been done. When asked if his order has been carried out, the only acceptable answer is “Yes, sir.”

Some of those joint chiefs will be new because some are getting retired on Day One. They are lucky – in the future, fired generals and admirals will not be allowed to retire at their current rank. Relieved officers will be retired at the rank at which they last served satisfactorily, and that’s never the rank they held when they were fired. This innovative personnel management policy will work wonders to focus the attention and action of our senior military leaders.

Second, the priority is fighting and the skills that go along with fighting. No more climate hoax nonsense, no more babble about green tanks, no more non-military military education—the military academies and war colleges have lost their way. Their job is to turn out killers. Too often, they turn out woke losers. Fire the heads of all the service schools and replace them with new leaders who get that their mission is to churn out fighters, not schmoozers.

Third, rebuild the trust the military lost because of its COVID policies and the pandemic of toxic leaders at the unit level. Focus on unit-level leadership. Make it clear that the noncommissioned officer corps is the backbone of the military – it’s what made our military work back when it did work. There is such thing as “NCO business” that officers should have no part of – officers don’t know how to conduct sergeant’s business, and when they try, they not only screw up but they tell their NCOs that they don’t trust them. The SecDef’s choice – he must make it his choice – for the senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (SEAC) is a critical one. The SecDef should snag the SEAC from the chairman and keep him close by his side as his personal sanity tester and bullSchiff detector.

He must rebuild the officer corps. Too often, our troops see not warfighters but timeservers and ticket-punchers in command who chose their careers over taking care of their troops. That needs to end. Not everyone is fit to be a commander even if they hold the required rank – the formal board system to assign officers to command slots has failed. The new SecDef must take a hands-on approach to pick aggressive, capable future leaders within the force as George Marshall did with his legendary notebook of officers to watch. Scrap the boards and have the SecDef and his designees manage the officer corps directly. Personnel is policy. The SecDef must pick his team down to the O5 (lieutenant colonel and Navy commander) level. Some will call subjective assignments unfair; what’s unfair is saddling our troops with commanders who look good on paper but can’t lead or fight.

The bureaucracy will attempt to bury the SecDef in the bowels of the Pentagon so it can co-opt him using the mushroom treatment – keep him in the dark and feed him manure. He must physically break out of there and reserve blocks of time to visit the field. He should start Day One by walking the Pentagon halls and dropping in on his troops – it’s called “leadership by walking around,” and it works. 

He needs to make short-notice trips to see what’s really happening elsewhere. “Ladies and gentlemen, this afternoon I am flying to – let’s see – how about Newport News to look at ships? I want a helicopter on the pad in an hour. Don’t tell the base commander. It’ll be a surprise.” And then he needs to go, along with some Navy subject matter expert straphangers, and ask questions like, “Admiral, why is that destroyer covered in rust instead of gleaming? Wait, let me ask your second-in-command because he’s now in charge since you are relieved.”

The SecDef cannot be everywhere, so he needs personal representatives outside of Pentagon channels to visit bases to find out the ground truth in the field and reinforce the SecDef’s intent. They should be pairs of retired senior officers and senior noncommissioned officers. Having NCO participation is critical. Private Jones knows the real story but he won’t tell some retired colonel. He will tell a retired first sergeant. These Special Representatives of the Secretary of Defense will be his independent eyes and ears. They need a travel budget and the credentials that make clear that they are present on the SecDef’s personal behalf. After the first general who tells the SecDef’s reps they can’t come onto his airbase gets relieved, that will be the end of the overt resistance.

But there will be covert resistance to the SecDef’s reforms. That’s why he must trim the Pentagon’s bloated civilian staff starting Day One. There is a lot of talk about how you cannot fire civil service personnel. That’s not so – you just have to do it right. And you don’t necessarily need to fire them – you can solve the problem by transferring them. Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska will get a bunch of new civilian workers. But mostly you have to work the system. Fire them or move them and then let them fight it. By the time their case is resolved, the SecDef will be retired and the lazy civil servant will be old.

There are many specific things the new SecDef must do, but a single general one. He must lead. This next Secretary of Defense cannot be a bureaucrat and hope to fix the primary problem with our military – the fact that it has stopped functioning like a military. This is why we fail to win wars. This is why our enlistees and junior officers leave the service. This is why vets dissuade young people from joining. We definitely cannot have another failure like Robert McNamara or Mark Esper. But we also do not necessarily need a George Patton or a Douglas MacArthur. Another George Marshall or Dwight Eisenhower, commanders who commanded without fanfare, would be great. Regardless, we need a real leader in the Pentagon. And starting Day One of Trump 2.0, he needs to lead.

Follow Kurt on Twitter @KurtSchlichter. Get the eighth volume in the Kelly Turnbull People’s Republic series of conservative action novels set in America after a notional national divorce, the bestselling Amazon #1 Military Thriller, Overlord! And get his new novel of terrorism in America, The Attack!

Look, you need to keep up the fight by joining Townhall VIP right now. You get access to a bunch of great stuff, not the least of which is my extra Wednesday Column, my weekly Stream of Kurtiousness videos every Friday, and the Unredacted podcast every Monday! Plus, some stuff from Larry O’Connor – and a bunch of other stuff.

 

How a Maine Dem Congressman Just Threw Biden Under the Bus

Some Democrats are accepting defeat in November, and they’re okay with it. It’s refreshing, in a sense, to see at least one Democrat who isn’t engulfed by Trump derangement syndrome. Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) 

 Golden predicts Trump victory

took to local media, penning, or at least a staffer did, an op-ed in Bangor Daily News saying plainly that Trump is going to win the election, and our nation, our democracy is going to be fine:

This Independence Day marks our nation’s 248th birthday. In that time, American democracy has withstood civil war, world wars, acts of terrorism and technological and societal changes that would make the Founders’ head spin. 

Pearl-clutching about a Trump victory ignores the strength of our democracy. Jan. 6, 2021, was a dark day. But Americans stood strong. Hundreds of police officers protected the democratic process against thousands who tried to use violence to upend it. Judges and state election officials upheld our election laws. Members of Congress, including leaders from both parties, certified the election results. 

They all are joined in the defense of democracy by the millions of us who, like me, made an oath of allegiance to the United States and to the Constitution when we began our military service, plus hundreds of millions of freedom-loving Americans who won’t let anyone take away our constitutional rights as citizens of the greatest democracy in history. 

This election is about the economy, not democracy. And when it comes to our economy, our Congress matters far more than who occupies the White House. 

[…] 

In 2025, I believe Trump is going to be in the White House. Maine’s representatives will need to work with him when it benefits Mainers, hold him accountable when it does not and work independently across the aisle no matter what. 

At long last, a Democrat who knows that often your side loses in a representative democracy. Public opinion is shiftable sand; there are no permanent majorities. Trump winning the presidency wasn’t the end of the world in 2016; it won’t be in 2024. It'll still be viewed a throwing Biden under the bus, but it seems scores of Democrats are doing that now. Biden remains adamant in staying in the race, however. 

While Rep. Golden talks about protecting liberal domestic items, he does pepper this piece with an ‘embrace the suck’ aura because he, like most voters, knows that Biden is too old to be president.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

The Mystery of Biden's Debate Cold Just Got More Interesting

We’re seeing a Biden White House besieged by the media, Democratic Party members, and even their own aides as the president’s staff deals with the fallout from his atrocious debate performance last week. We were told he had a cold, one of the many unbelievable reasons, was to blame for Biden’s mentally slow and soporific debate performance. Trump wiped the floor with him. As the president and his campaign put out fires among the donors and top Democratic leaders, Biden is also mulling stepping aside, though for now—he’s determined to carry on. We’ll see how the polling fares once the Independence Day holiday passes. 

Besides phone calls, 20 Democratic governors met with the president yesterday, which Politico described as part mea culpa, part brainstorming session, and part pep rally. The first part is something of a surprise since the Biden campaign has opted to double down, claiming that the president is the healthiest he’s ever been while dismissing or ignoring top donors’ concerns about the president’s mental health. Regarding the electorate, that fate is sealed: three-fourths think he’s too old to be president. Yet, there was another surprise at this governor’s meeting: Biden saw the doctor and didn’t tell anyone about it (via Politico): 

Biden’s disastrous debate performance wasn’t just because of a “cold” anymore. He also had “jet lag.”

KJP assures us these aren't excuses but "explanations." pic.twitter.com/nvUWsPbLsa

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) July 3, 2024

President Joe Biden on Wednesday evening told more than 20 Democratic governors in a private meeting that he underwent a medical checkup after last week’s debate and is fine, according to three people with knowledge of the discussion. 

During an hour-long meeting prompted by intensifying concerns about his health and political viability, one governor asked Biden about his physical condition. The president mentioned having had a checkup in recent days and asserted that he remains in good health, knocking on wood for effect, according to two of those people, who were granted anonymity to describe a private meeting. 

That statement — in a hastily arranged White House meeting that saw nearly a dozen governors travel to Washington while others participated virtually — came just hours after press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre sidestepped direct questions from reporters who asked if he’d been examined since the debate.

“The president has regular annual physicals that we release in a thorough report,” she said. “We’re going to continue to do that.” 

Biden’s remark, according to a person familiar with the president’s schedule, was in reference to a short checkup by a White House physician in the days following the debate due to lingering symptoms from his cold. The exam, that person added, was brief and did not include any major tests. 

Two Democratic governors — Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico and Janet Mills of Maine — expressed concern to Biden over whether he could still win their blue-leaning states, describing them as competitive, two of the people with knowledge of the discussion said.

Who examined him?
When did this happen?
Where is the medical report?

Journalists now is your chance to show us how you were all just cleverly duped by the White House and didn't just blindly go along with things. pic.twitter.com/mAxGPT8rfU

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) July 4, 2024

The president says he had a medical exam post debate and no one in media knew about it? https://t.co/PxqjCimMNU

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) July 4, 2024

🚨Either Biden is lying or Karine Jean-Pierre is — either way the White House credibility crisis just got worse pic.twitter.com/MfjFupfNKR

— Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) July 4, 2024

Alas, this is why the media’s refusal to cover the Biden White House aggressively, like reporting on his declining mental health, is essential. Someone probably would have found out about this. Instead, the nation, concerned about Biden’s ability to do the job, was unaware he visited the doctor. As Stephen Miller, aka RedSteeze, tweeted, who did the exam, where’s the report, and when did it happen? Three key questions that now linger, inquiries that White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre should be ready for at the next press briefing.

 

White House Aides Concede That Biden Must Quickly 'Demonstrate Mental Fitness,' Or Plan Efforts To Force His Removal

President Joe Biden’s senior aides said on Wednesday that they have accepted the dire warnings received this week from prominent members of the Democrat Party: either promptly prove Biden is qualified for office or face a major push to remove him from office.

According to two people familiar with the conversations who spoke with the Washington Post on Wednesday, Biden began discreetly reaching out to allies in recent days, acknowledging that he is going through a difficult time and that he needs to show voters that he is qualified for the position due to growing concern from Capitol Hill, prominent donors, and senior party strategists, including some of his own advisers.

His comparatively passive response to quell the alarm caused by his dismal debate performance over the last six days has unsettled his detractors. He began phoning influential congressional leaders on Tuesday afternoon, set up a sit-down interview with ABC News, and “announced a series of weekend campaign travel that will be closely scrutinized,” Washington Post reported.

Senior Democrat strategists, who requested anonymity in regards to the Washington post piece so that they could reveal internal conversations, warned that even a perfect performance over the next week could very well not be enough to save him.

Since the rally on Friday in North Carolina, Biden, 81, has only made three public appearances. During those appearances, he spoke for a total of 22 minutes while utilizing teleprompters in his speeches on severe weather, the recent Supreme Court immunity ruling, and Stonewall National Monument in New York.

As alarm began to spread within the party, a senior campaign adviser described the situation as “a deafening silence” from the top, echoing the worries of other advisers who described the president’s reluctance to show his suitability for government in public. Longtime Biden allies have also expressed their ongoing dissatisfaction with the political response as well as their growing belief that something needs to happen quickly in order to change public opinion.

“I think the onus is really on Biden right now to be very candid with all of us privately, not publicly, not that we’re going to tell reporters, but to be very candid with us privately about what happened. What is the larger issue? Can we get through this?” said Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.). “We do need more than emails of polling briefs from White House legislative affairs directors right now to assuage those concerns.”

Ahead of a scheduled meeting with Democrat governors, Biden, however, spent a large portion of Wednesday trying to allay public concerns by speaking with his campaign staff and giving interviews with several radio stations.

“The past few days have been tough. I’m sure you’re getting a lot of calls, and I’m sure many of you have questions as well,” Biden told campaign staff in a conference call, according to an aide who relayed this information to the Washington Post. “Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can and as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running. I’m the nominee of the Democratic Party. No one’s pushing me out. I’m not leaving. I’m in this race to the end, and we’re going to win because when Democrats unite, we always win.”

Soon after, Vice President Kamala Harris joined the same call and asserted: “We will not back down. We will follow our president’s lead. We will fight, and we will win.”

Additionally, a June debate between Biden and Trump was demanded by Biden’s campaign staff in order to address voter apathy and age-related concerns. Instead, as indicated by public surveys, his poor performance alarmed the party and raised doubts about his competency among the general public.

Even though only Republicans had previously expressed these worries regarding Biden’s faulty memory and cognitive skills, it seems as though Democrats are now in the same boat, and the wave of denial has passed.

Drafts of a potential public letter for House Democrats to consider calling on Biden to resign were still being discussed among themselves on Wednesday. Congressmen Jared Golden (D-Maine.) and Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) publicly declared on Tuesday that Biden is no longer able to win, while Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas.) stated that he ought to be replaced as the party’s nominee for president. On Wednesday, Representative Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) also demanded that Biden resign.

Members of the House purportedly presented a new YouGov poll showing Biden trailing Trump on a text chain on Wednesday morning.

As one senator on the text chain put it: “There’s all this potential to defeat Trump and it also says how much it’s being held back by Biden.”

However, other uneasy lawmakers did not take the poll results seriously.

“The president and his team have been through the highest of highs and the lowest of lows. And you know what? That will continue,” stated Jeff Zients, the White House’s chief of staff, on a call. “The only way to get through it is as a team.”

According to another source involved with the discussions, Biden has lost major support of the wealthy donor sector. It is not totally apparent yet if it will materially affect funding if Biden continues in the campaign. Donor advisers claim that significant funds to anticipated outside organizations working for his campaign have been withheld in numerous instances since the first debate, according to the Washington Post.

Additionally, in the past few days, liberal donor networks such as the Democracy Alliance, American Bridge, and the Strategic Victory Fund have all hosted calls, during which contributors have voiced grievances about proceeding. One independent group’s officials have started looking at polls to assess how well their planned ads will perform in the event that Biden does not end up being the Democrat nominee.

In one instance, an unidentified corporate executive who assisted in organizing a fundraiser for the Chicago convention last year claimed that even big donors were denied the opportunity to pose questions to Biden in a private gathering by the president’s team. The individual emphasized that this refusal was “shocking.”

“I told them my donors don’t care about a photo. They want to talk to him. The Biden people just wouldn’t let them,” he said. “It was clear they were managing him in a way I’ve never experienced before. Donors expect to get to talk to the president if you’re writing a big check and having an event with him.”

In the meantime, Biden’s family has now acknowledged the “unsatisfactory” debate and the precarious situation, but they have stated that he will continue to be the party’s nominee barring major polling data declines or the worries and doubt of high-profile Democrat officials.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

 

CartoonDems