Thomas C. Williams |
If your name isn’t good enough for a college, is your money? Such a question has been raised over a now-deleted donator in Virginia. The situation dates back to 1846, when a man named Thomas C. Williams attended Richmond College. In the 1880s, he served as a trustee. More from the Richmond Times-Dispatch:
That was then, this is now. In September of 2022, the University of Richmond board voted unanimously to change the name to the University of Richmond School of Law. At the time, President Kevin Hallock and the board issued a letter:
He may have played an important part, but according to tax records, T.C.’s successful tobacco business owned 25 to 40 slaves. Six months before T.C.’s booting, half a dozen campus buildings were re-labeled. Gone were references to those who’d possessed slaves — including Robert Ryland, the school’s first president in 1840. On March 26th, a new policy was instated:
Out with the old, in with the new. But T.C.’s family wants their man’s old money back: If he’s unworthy of recognition for his efforts, they figure, his cash should be no good as well. T.C.’s great-great-grandson explained in a letter to the president.
It was a might more than a penny; Rob has done the math:
Bottom line:
Rob told The College Fix his family has sent President Kevin “20 (unreturned) emails asking for the evidence” regarding their ancestor’s slavery connection. Furthermore, Rob’s October 11th letter indicates the family may have assisted minorities during a pivotal time:
Perhaps similar things could be said of departed others ejected from prominent places. Even so, name removal has titanically taken hold: George Washington University Decolonizes Itself by Displacing Its Mascot Woke Fail: University Evicts a Slaveholder’s Statue, Still Puts His Name on Every T-Shirt A Ghost Reminds Six Students of a KKK Equestrian, and That Alone May Unsaddle a $100,000 Statue Article at Biden’s Alma Mater Cancels Abe Lincoln — a Racist Executioner Back to the University of Richmond and T.C. Williams, it may surprise some people that the demand of a refund hasn’t been made in many other instances. Could we be headed toward more? Maybe. Meanwhile, Rob thinks the University and its president need to look inward:
-ALEX |
No comments:
Post a Comment