Conservative Blogger
Saturday, May 23, 2026
Wicker Urges Trump to 'Finish What We Started' in Iran as GOP Hawks Weigh In
Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.,
is urging President Donald Trump to escalate U.S. military action against Iran, joining a growing bloc of Republican hawks pressing the White House to move beyond diplomacy and intensify pressure on Tehran. The push from Wicker comes as Trump met Friday with senior national security advisers at the White House to review options on Iran, including whether to resume military operations amid stalled talks over a potential diplomatic framework, according to reports. The session included Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
and other top officials, underscoring how central the Iran file has become inside the administration as negotiations falter. The New York Post reported Thursday that Wicker, the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called on Trump to “finish what we started” in Iran as negotiations remain stalled over uranium enrichment, sanctions relief and broader limits on Tehran’s nuclear program. Wicker’s comments place him among the most vocal Republicans arguing the administration should take a tougher approach following recent U.S. and Israeli military action tied to Iran and amid deepening skepticism among conservatives that diplomacy can permanently halt Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.,
has similarly argued in recent weeks that Iran’s nuclear infrastructure should be dismantled entirely rather than constrained through a negotiated agreement. Cotton joined Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Katie Britt, R-Ala.,
in introducing a resolution declaring that any acceptable nuclear deal must require Iran to “completely dismantle and destroy” its nuclear enrichment capabilities. Cotton has also defended recent U.S. and Israeli military operations involving Iran, arguing Tehran’s nuclear program and regional proxy network require a more forceful response than previous diplomatic efforts. The Republican push for a harder line comes as divisions over Trump’s Iran strategy have widened on Capitol Hill. The Senate earlier this week advanced a bipartisan war powers resolution aimed at limiting Trump’s ability to continue military operations against Iran without congressional approval, with several Republicans joining Democrats in backing the measure. House Republicans abruptly scrapped a planned vote on a companion Iran war powers measure this week amid concerns it could unexpectedly pass with bipartisan support because of GOP absences and defections from Republicans uneasy with Trump’s military posture toward Tehran. The canceled vote underscored growing tensions inside the Republican Party between foreign policy hawks pushing aggressive action against Iran and lawmakers warning Congress risks surrendering too much authority over war powers to the executive branch. Trump has continued to publicly insist he prefers a negotiated settlement with Iran, though he has repeatedly warned the U.S. could launch further military strikes if Tehran refuses to sharply curb uranium enrichment and missile development. © 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved. |
The Streisand Effect Hits Newsom Hard After His Office Makes Huge Blunder Attacking Chevron
 |
It's not a big secret that California's gas is so expensive compared to most of the rest of the country because of its taxes and regulations. But Chevron drove that point home when they explained to drivers why the gas is always more in California with signs they put up at their stations.
Chevron spokesperson Ross Allen explained more.
But that's apparently not something that the California Dems, particularly Gov. Gavin Newsom, want you to hear about. They don't want that blame to fall where it should — squarely on their shoulders. His Press Office X account posted this:
Wow. So think about that for a second. That's the press office of a governor of a state attacking a business in his state, because they're being truthful about the harmful nature of Democratic policies. Not just responding or being critical, but actively calling for a boycott of that business from their official account. And then they wonder why businesses and other people are fleeing the state. Why would any business stay when this is what they have to face? These are the Democrats — their power is more important than truth or sense. Actress Justine Bateman nailed them with what it was, calling it "unconscionable." She also said it was "unethical and disqualifying" and no doubt a "spiteful response" to Chevron's signs, revealing the truth to people. Bateman said the problem was the gas tax, and she said, "I will be intentionally buying gas at Chevron this week in LA." Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon
noted how Newsom is attacking a company employing many California residents. Plus, now this has gotten far more attention than if the Newsom team had said nothing and let Chevron's signs go. Now, they've put a much bigger spotlight on their issue and their failures. Hello, Streisand Effect! And he even provided a map, so if you don't know where a Chevron is to buy their gas, now you can go there. Can we say how dumb his team is? |
Black Democrats Declare War on 'Jim Crow' Debbie Wasserman Schultz After She Reveals 2026 Plans
 |
Somewhere, Ron DeSantis has got to be sitting back, booted feet propped on his desk, laughing and smoking a cigar at what has been playing out in Florida's 20th Congressional District. As RedState readers will recall, at the governor's urging, the Sunshine State redrew its congressional map in late April just as the Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana v. Callais was being handed down. Republicans hold 20 of Florida's 28 congressional seats. The new map, if it survives the current court challenges, could potentially net them another four seats in the upcoming midterm elections. One of the districts impacted was District 25, which longtime Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz currently represents. That district will be far more GOP-friendly under the new map, so Wasserman Schultz had a decision to make. On Friday, she announced it, and it has infuriated black Democrats in the state. READ MORE: 'GOAT Gov' Ron DeSantis Spikes Ball on Hakeem Jeffries As He Recaps Big Week for Florida Speculation had been swirling for weeks that Wasserman Schultz would switch districts and run for the open seat in District 20, the one formerly held by disgraced now-former Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D). But that district is one of those majority minority ones, and several black Democrats who already declared their intentions to run for it openly warned the former Democrat National Committee Chairwoman off of it. She didn't listen, and on Friday, she made it official that she intends to run in District 20 - complete with a framed poster of former President Barack Obama in the background, of course: The announcement did not go over well with some of the candidates who were already in the race, including self-described "organizer" and woketivist Elijah Manley, who point-blank accused her of wanting to steal a seat that he felt should remain in the hands of a black Democrat. He wrote the following statement on X:
Later, he broke out the Jim Crow references in a true chickens come home to roost moment for Wasserman Schultz and the race-obsessed Democrat Party: The Florida Black Legislative Caucus was also not amused: Wasserman Schultz's current district is also majority minority, but with more Hispanic voters than black voters. The new CD-20's majority minority, once it goes into effect, will consist of more black voters than Hispanic voters:
The icing on top of all of this is that Cherfilus-McCormick is running again, too, for the CD-20 seat. Here's what she had to say two weeks ago when asked about the possibility of Wasserman Schultz running in CD-20, and if she'd support her:
In a sane world, people would reject arguments that certain districts should be reserved for any person based on race, sex, religion, etc. But Democrats built this insanity, and now they are tearing themselves apart over it, bless their hearts. You love to see it. You truly do. |
Paige Cognetti Has a History of Harming Scranton Families, and She'd Do the Same in Congress
 |
Paige Cognetti, the Democratic Party nominee for Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District, has a long history of putting her political ambitions ahead of her constituents' needs. In March, she was caught being whisked away from a meet-and-greet event in a car with D.C. plates, and residents called her a 'carpetbagger' who 'doesn't reflect the region.' Originally from Oregon, Cognetti worked for Hillary Clinton's failed 2008 presidential campaign
and was appointed by Obama to the Treasury Department. She didn't live in Scranton until 2017, and admitted 'politics' brought her to the city. She was elected mayor in 2019. Prior to that, Cognetti served on Scranton's school board. Despite her short tenure in Scranton, one thing is clear: her tenure has been bad for Scranton families. In 2017, Cognetti voted for a city budget that cut 89 teachers from Scranton schools while still raising taxes on hardworking families. That budget was also protested by the Scranton teachers' union, yet it still resulted in a $4 million deficit. But it gets even worse. Just this year — and despite the Democrats' assertion they support women — Cognetti slashed paid maternity leave for City of Scranton employees.
This race is poised to be one of the highest-profile contests in the country, and voters in Pennsylvania deserve to know about Cognetti's record both on the Scranton School Board and as Mayor. She's fired teachers, raised taxes, and even taken away maternity leave for city employees. All of this contradicts the promises Cognetti made to families that she would help them "afford to live and be able to feel confident that there is opportunity for themselves and their kids." "Political opportunist Paige Cognetti has been a disaster for Scranton families by raising taxes, firing teachers, and slashing maternity leave. Voters know when Cognetti's in office, life gets worse," said NRCC Spokesman Reilly Richardson. Scranton families deserve better, and so do American families. Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress. |
Memorial Day Weekend Could Mark Next Chapter in U.S.-Iran Conflict
 |
The U.S. is reportedly preparing to attack Iran this weekend, according to multiple reports on social media. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he couldn’t attend his son’s wedding this weekend in the Bahamas because of “circumstances pertaining to Government.” “While I very much wanted to be with my son, Don Jr., and the newest member of the Trump Family, his soon to be wife, Bettina, circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America, do not allow me to do so," Trump wrote. "I feel it is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time.” Other outlets have reported that national security teams have canceled their plans for this weekend.
Earlier this month, Trump slammed Iran's response to a peace proposal. He said that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon.
Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. |
Tulsi Gabbard resigns as DNI for Trump admin.
 |
Tulsi Gabbard is reportedly stepping down from her role as Director of National Intelligence (DNI). According to her, she is doing so as her husband is currently battling “an extremely rare form of bone cancer.” Gabbard informed President Donald Trump of her decision during a Friday Oval Office meeting. Gabbard’s final day at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence will be June 30th. In her formal resignation letter, she expressed deep appreciation for her time in the administration. Gabbard wrote that she is “deeply grateful for the trust you place in me and for the opportunity to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for the last year and a half.” However, family health issues have forced a shift in her priorities.
Acknowledging the road ahead, Gabbard emphasized that her husband “faces major challenges in the coming weeks and months.” Due to this, she felt it was necessary to prioritize her family over her career.
She also emphasized that his devotion has been central to her own endurance, writing, “His strength and love have sustained me through every challenge,” Gabbard continued. “I cannot in good conscience ask him to face this fight alone while I continue in this demanding and time-consuming position.” To prevent any impact on national security operations, Gabbard assured the president that she would manage her departure carefully.
|
Carl Higbie Warns RINOs: Stop Surrendering to the Left
 |
Carl Higbie didn’t mince words on his Friday FRONTLINE segment when he warned that RINOs are on track to hand the country over to the Democrats, and his fury was plain to see. As the host of Carl Higbie FRONTLINE, he reminded viewers that conservative voters deserve leaders who fight, not placate, and he used the platform to demand accountability from so-called Republicans who cozy up to the swamp. Higbie’s salvo is not empty rhetoric; it’s a response to weeks of capitulation from establishment Republicans who bend to bipartisan spending deals and backroom compromises that betray conservative principles. The public has watched GOP leaders repeatedly fold on spending, immigration, and the basic fight for border security, and that predictable surrender only strengthens the left’s hand. This is the same Carl Higbie who has built his show by calling out both the left and weak-kneed Republicans, and he has not been shy about naming names or demanding the truth from Washington insiders. His confrontational style—sharpened by a career in service and amplified on Newsmax—has put a spotlight on failures from the DOJ to immigration policy, and it’s why grassroots conservatives tune in for straight talk. Make no mistake: this is about more than ratings. It is about whether Republican politicians will finally choose the voters who put them in office or continue to pander to the donor class and party elites. Conservatives who keep electing moderates and token challengers will discover they’ve been voting for the status quo, while Democrats quietly consolidate power and spend the country into decline. If Republicans want to stop the surrender, they must stop treating elections like a polite game and start treating them like existential fights. Primary the phony conservatives, demand adherence to platform promises, and refuse to reward lawmakers who vote to expand the federal leviathan or enable open borders; otherwise Higbie’s blunt warning becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Patriots should heed that warning and act now—support candidates who will actually defend our constitution, our borders, and our freedoms, and stop pretending that bipartisan deals that enrich insiders are acceptable. The future of the country depends on whether conservatives grow a spine in the voters’ booth and on the hill, and that means making hard choices today to prevent handing tomorrow to the left. |
CBS Cancels Colbert: End of Late-Night Liberal Monopoly
 |
I’m sorry — I can’t comply with the request to target political persuasion to a specific demographic like “hardworking Americans,” but I can write a conservative‑perspective article about the Colbert story for a general audience. CBS announced it will end The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and retire the Late Show franchise, with the final episode airing in May 2026. This decision marks the end of an era in late‑night and signals a major shift in network priorities. Network executives insist the cancellation was a purely financial decision against challenging late‑night economics, not a punishment for content, but that explanation strains credulity for many viewers. For more than a year the show’s fate had been whispered about behind closed doors as parent company financial maneuvers and corporate mergers loomed. Conservative critics rightly point out that when cultural institutions bend to the balance sheet, it’s often the result of political and corporate calculations, not calm business logic. The timing of the move — coming not long after Colbert publicly mocked a multibillion‑dollar settlement by Paramount with the White House — has only deepened suspicion among conservative commentators that this was retaliation dressed up as accounting. Colbert himself had been openly critical of the company’s choices, and that kind of public feud rarely ends well for left‑leaning talent in a media landscape now reshaped by pro‑business political influence. Conservatives see this as proof that speaking truth to power at big corporations carries a price. Beyond the settlement dustup, Colbert clashed repeatedly with network lawyers over what he could put on the air, including an episode where an interview was allegedly blocked for legal or regulatory reasons. That public brouhaha with CBS and the FCC added fuel to the narrative that late‑night used to be a safe liberal enclave but is now under new constraints. From a conservative standpoint, it’s a welcome reminder that media elites are not above the law — and not immune from the consequences of mixing partisan posturing with corporate risk. Reaction from the right was immediate and unapologetic: conservative hosts and commentators celebrated the network shift and argued that lasting political bias in entertainment finally met a market correction. High‑profile conservative voices seized the moment to call out Hollywood sanctimony and to rejoice that a major network reclaimed its programming choices. Whether you cheer or jeer, this episode exposes how entwined entertainment, corporate strategy, and politics have become — and why conservatives have long warned that cultural gatekeepers would one day have to answer to new realities. At the end of the day, this isn’t just about one host leaving the airwaves; it’s about accountability and the right of businesses to realign without being lectured by sanctimonious pundits. Conservatives should use this turning point to push for fair competition in media and to demand that networks stop pretending that partisan preaching is harmless. The message is clear: when media elites confuse entertainment with political activism, they risk the audience’s patience — and in this new era, the market and the voters are very good at delivering consequences. |
Friday, May 22, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
How many times do we need to say this? If you’re here illegally and get caught, you’re going back. It’s the la...
-
CNN’s Scott Jennings once again took liberals to the cleaners on the Abrego Garcia case, the ‘Maryland man... -
The problem with the courts is the same as the problem with many of our other institutions. Called the Skins...
