CartoonDems

 

Report: Iranian President Seeks Exit Over Power Clash

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has reportedly moved to resign after concluding that his administration no longer has meaningful influence over key decisions in the Islamic Republic.

According to Iran International, which cited a source familiar with the matter, Pezeshkian submitted a resignation letter Sunday to the office of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei.

The development comes amid an apparent power struggle between Iran's civilian government and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the military force that has long wielded significant political influence inside the country.

The source told Iran International that Pezeshkian's letter argues "the president and the government have effectively been excluded from major and vital decision-making processes in the country, and that the vacuum created by this situation has enabled hardline factions within the IRGC to take control of affairs."

Pezeshkian also reportedly stated that "under such circumstances he is unable to run the government and carry out his legal responsibilities, and for that reason has requested to step down immediately."

No decision on the resignation has been announced publicly. It remains uncertain whether Khamenei will approve the request.

If confirmed, the move would mark a dramatic escalation in tensions within Iran's ruling system, highlighting growing divisions between elected officials and the country's security establishment.

Iran International previously reported that the IRGC has expanded its role in governing the country while limiting the authority of the presidency. Sources cited by the outlet said the resulting deadlock has stalled diplomatic initiatives and hindered efforts by Pezeshkian's administration to implement changes within the government.

Iranian officials had not publicly addressed the report as of Monday, and Newsmax has not independently verified the claims.

 

Woke Gone Wild: Biden and Kerry's Vacation Hotspot Turns 4th of July Into Self Flagellation Ritual

Spot poll: Who’s more cringe, former mumbling President Joe Biden or woke climate warrior, windsurfer, and one-time Obama Secretary of State John Kerry? I give the slightest of edges to John because of his cadaver-like monotone speeches at summits around the world about how we’re all going to die, like tomorrow. Watching him is about as pleasant as inhaling paprika into your nose.

They both have loved to vacation on the elitist island of Nantucket over the years, which is only a little over an hour's ferry ride from that other leftist enclave, Barack Obama's Martha’s Vineyard. (Kerry sold his Nantucket home in 2018 for $17.5 million to downsize into a little $12 million property on the 'Yard. Maybe he's not so worried about rising seas after all?) 

Full disclosure: I’ve been to Nantucket, and it’s quite pleasant. But for the woke crowd, it’s just too damn white:

A Nantucket church on the exclusive Massachusetts island long favored by former President Joe Biden canceled its annual Fourth of July reading of America’s founding documents, citing an effort to understand "our own whiteness" and drawing sharp criticism from conservatives.

"Our cancelling the 4th of July celebration this year reflects ... an on-going process within the congregation to better understand our own whiteness," wrote Nantucket Unitarian Universalists (NUU) and the Rev. Erin Splaine of the Second Congregational Meeting House Society in a letter published by the Nantucket Current on Thursday.

The historic Nantucket Unitarian Meeting House has hosted a public reading of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in downtown Nantucket each Fourth of July holiday for the past 25 years.

Whatever the hell that means. Call me crazy, but it sure sounds racist.

Wtf. Erin Splaine, the "Reverend" of the woke Unitarian Universalist Church in Nantucket, just canceled July 4th celebrations because White people are "privileged" and honoring American history "perpetuates the harm, injustice, and anti-democratic process."

She then forbids anyone from contacting her on social media about her decision.

---

SIGH: Zohran Mamdani Touts His 'Racial Equity Plan' for NYC — What Could Go Wrong?

Making Discrimination Great Again: VA Race and Gender-Based Hiring Bill Heads to Gov. Spanberger's Desk

---

I wrote recently about the peak “woke” moments we’ve seen in this country over the past few years, and how silly and destructive they were, but if I had to write that article again, I’d be sure to include this monumental BS coming out of the church. This is absolute leftist self-hate slop:

“We came to this decision in large measure because of the recent gutting of the 1965 Voting Rights Act by the Supreme Court,” Rev. Erin Splaine and the group’s board of trustees wrote in a letter to the Nantucket Current news outlet on Thursday. ” A celebration without context and the centering of the fullness of our American Story only perpetuates the harm, injustice, and anti-democratic process.”

“Our cancelling the 4th of July celebration this year reflects the deep concern we are feeling since the Supreme Court decision,” the letter continues, “as well as an on-going process within the congregation to better understand our own whiteness and how we can be part of changing an inherently unfair system which has been in place for 250 years.”

Luckily, with the return of Donald Trump to the Oval Office, we’re seeing less of this ridiculousness, racism, and self‑sabotage dressed as morality. That doesn’t mean the woke scourge has gone away entirely, though, and we’re still going to call it out wherever we see it. As we approach our nation’s 250^th birthday, this is toxic bile, and this Nantucket church can go take a long walk off a short pier.

I have yet to see a reaction from Biden or Kerry, and I won’t hold my breath. 

Trump DOJ Pulls Plug on $1.8 Billion ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund

As RedState reported on Friday, the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Virginia temporarily blocked any action on President Donald Trump's $1.778 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund. Rather than appeal this decision, on Monday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) chose to pull the plug.

The Trump administration will scrap its nearly $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund amid pushback from GOP members of Congress and a lingering court battle demanding an explanation for the arrangement.

The move comes after a federal judge in Florida on Friday reopened Trump’s case against the IRS, whose settlement served as the basis for creating the $1.776 billion fund. In doing so, the judge ordered President Trump and the Justice Department to file briefs to explain “charges of collusion and whether the Parties are truly adverse.”

In a separate case, another federal judge in Virginia on Friday also temporarily halted the fund from making any payouts.

The DOJ issued a statement on X.

 

The Department of Justice disagrees strongly with the decision on the Anti-Weaponization Fund put forth by the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia, wherein the Court stated that, under no circumstances, may the Department of Justice proceed with the Anti-Weaponization Fund recently established in order to make up for the tremendous abuse, harm, and hate unfairly shown to so many people. This Fund was open to anybody who was so weaponized, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise. The Department will abide by the Court’s ruling.

---

Dive Deeper: Updated: Trump Drops $10B IRS Lawsuit As Democrats Freak Out Over $1.7B Settlement Fund

 Judge Places Temp. Pause on Disbursement of DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund

---

As we reported on May 18, President Trump chose to drop his ten billion dollar lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leaking of his tax returns. As part of that deal, the president wanted a fund established for the victims of lawfare and weaponization enacted by the Biden administration. 

The DOJ first announced these plans, and the legacy media and Democrats immediately labeled the plan as the "Anti-Weaponization Fund." Before the U.S. District Court issued its temporary injunction, both Republicans and Democrats hijacked plans for the reconciliation bill to debate this fund. Two cops involved in the January 6 riots also filed a lawsuit against disbursements from the fund.

A J6 defendant who would have benefited from the fund sees the DOJ's cancellation as the perfect opportunity for the department to mount a full investigation into the abuses of the government against the January 6 victims.

The anti-weaponization fund is finished. Now DOJ will have no choice but to shift to the option it should have been pursuing for the last 16 months:

A full investigation into the abuses of the government against J6 defendants and reveal it all to the country. There are no easy solutions to such an extensive persecution.

 

So, That's Why Jill Biden's Book Is Coming Out Now

Former First Lady Jill Biden is creating issues for Democrats with her book about her time in the White House. No one wants to hear it, as the couple has yet to accept responsibility for their part in their party’s crushing defeat by Donald Trump in 2024. The most loyal Biden allies at the White House aren’t happy with this work; some even call it a web of lies. 

Like the Biden White House, this book tour hasn’t shed much light on the inner workings of this failed presidency. It's still a guarded effort, with Jill avoiding tough issues like her husband’s declining health, which was obvious toward the end of his disastrous run at 1600. She isn’t open about what happened on debate night or her husband’s mental decline, though there's an interesting detail about how Kamala Harris influenced Joe’s decision on an endorsement when he dropped out. 

 

So, why did she write this book? 

First, it’s tradition—a book of some sort was going to happen. But former MSNBC analyst Mark Halperin 

 

noted the most obvious reason: they need money. Hunter Biden isn’t doing his government access stuff anymore after that got exposed, so this family, which has numerous members and hordes of grandchildren, needs to keep raking in the dough:

And when it comes time to plug the book, Jill really wasn’t enthusiastic about it, so they know this thing is a grenade. 

 

If You're a Dem and The View of All Places Turns Its Back on You, You've Definitely Screwed Up

Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner is in serious trouble: he has sexting issues, an account on an app known to be used by pedophiles, and a Nazi tattoo. It’s all bad, and when the women of The View, who can tolerate almost anything, turn their backs on you, you’ve really messed up. It was a nightmare weekend for Platner’s campaign, which confirmed the sexting but later tried to backtrack. 

 

It’s a giant mess that must bring a smile to Susan Collins's face. The ladies of this insufferable daytime show wondered if this was the best Maine could do. While it’s not official, the people have spoken, ladies. Platner is the only viable candidate left (via NY Post):

DEM CANDIDATE’S WIFE REPORTEDLY FLAGGED SEXUALLY EXPLICIT TEXTS: 'The View' co-hosts weigh in on the reported controversies coming from Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, which he denies. pic.twitter.com/JtCid0yvz1

— The View (@TheView) June 1, 2026

He’s even lost “The View.”

Hosts of ABC’s “The View” turned on Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner, ripping the horny oyster farmer for his alleged extramarital sexting scandal, voicing their disgust at his behavior.

 

“It is disturbing; it is horrible. Why can’t we do better? Why can’t we have better candidates?” co-host Ana Navarro vented. “Why do we have to have Ken Paxton in Texas who has got baggage? It’s not even baggage; it’s steamer trunks of ethical questions around him.”

First, yeah, this guy might be cooked. Second, it took a sexting fiasco for Democrats writ large to be like, ‘whoa, whoa—we may have a problem here?’ The Nazi tattoos weren’t a red flag that trouble might be ahead. 

 

CBP announces new Border Patrol chief

 

United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced Rosario “Pete” Vasquez was appointed as the new chief of U.S. Border Patrol, where he will oversee close to 20,000 agents and staff members across the nation.

In a Monday press release, the agency said Vasquez will work under the leadership of President Donald Trump, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin and CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott to secure the borders, which include nearly 7,000 miles of land borders and 2,000 miles of coastal waters, according to CBP.

 “It is the honor of a lifetime to serve as chief of the United States Border Patrol, and I’m grateful for the trust placed in me by President Trump, Secretary Mullin and Commissioner Scott,” Vasquez said, per the release.

“Our agents have never backed down from a challenge, and neither will I. As chief, my focus is clear: support our agents, strengthen our operational capabilities, and ensure the U.S. Border Patrol remains the most effective border security force in the world,” he continued.

 

According to the agency, Vasquez has more than 26 years of distinguished service under his belt, serving in a broad range of leadership assignments. Most recently, CBP noted, Vazquez served as the chief patrol agent of Border Patrol’s Blaine Sector in the state of Washington.

Welcome Chief Rosario “Pete” Vasquez as the newly appointed, 28th @usbpchief of the United States Border Patrol.

With more than 26 years of dedicated service, Chief Vasquez has exemplified leadership, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to securing our Nation’s borders. From… pic.twitter.com/FaF8NCbiEv

— CBP (@CBP) June 1, 2026

“Pete Vasquez is a Border Patrol agent’s agent, said Commissioner Scott, according to the release. “He has spent more than two decades leading from the front, earning the respect of the workforce, and delivering results in some of the most challenging operational environments in the country.”

 

“He understands what this mission demands because he has lived it. There is no one better suited to lead the United States Border Patrol into its next chapter,” he continued.

The CBP explained the extensive nature of Vasquez’s new responsibilities.

“As Chief, Vasquez will oversee nearly 20,000 Border Patrol agents and professional staff operating across the nation, leading efforts to combat transnational criminal organizations, disrupt human smuggling and narcotics trafficking networks, and safeguard U.S. sovereignty,” the release stated. 

 

Vasquez’s appointment follows the resignation of former Border Patrol Chief Mike Banks last month.

Pentagon Pushes Battlefield AI While Admiral Bradley Warns

 The debate over military AI has moved out of think tanks and into briefing rooms. The Pentagon is pushing hard to put artificial intelligence on the battlefield, while some senior military leaders are urging caution. That split should make every American sit up. We want to win the next fight, but we should not hand our soldiers a tool we do not fully control.

What the Pentagon Wants and What It’s Doing

Defense leaders say they want “functional battlefield tools” that help troops find targets and make faster decisions. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the White House have pushed for rapid AI adoption and deals with big tech firms to give commanders better information. The Pentagon already uses AI in some targeting systems, and it has cut deals with multiple tech companies to speed up deployment.

 

 Why Some Military Leaders Are Sounding the Alarm

Special Operations leaders are not cheering blindly. Admiral Frank Bradley warned at a recent conference that humans must be sure AI will “deliver violence only where we intend it to be delivered.” Others say AI should free troops from paperwork and speed planning—not decide to pull a trigger. There are also real worries about autonomous drones, mass surveillance and cybersecurity. When even Treasury-level officials raise flags, those concerns are more than academic.

A Smart Balance or a Reckless Rush?

Republicans should be pro-innovation and pro-victory. We also need rules so that military AI helps, rather than harms, our troops and our freedoms. That means insisting on human-in-the-loop safeguards, clear legal guardrails, and strict limits on autonomous lethal action. It also means holding tech companies accountable whether they bow to the Pentagon or balk at military use. We can’t win the AI race by throwing caution out the window or by letting bureaucrats hand over unchecked power to unproven systems.

Bottom line: military AI can be a force multiplier if used wisely. Lawmakers and commanders must set bright lines now. Let’s give soldiers better tools, not a field of ethical landmines. The choice is simple: lead with common sense, keep human control over lethal force, and make sure America wins without sacrificing our values or our soldiers’ safety.

Delaney Hall Chaos: DHS Denies Hunger Strike as Curfew, Arrests Mount

The unrest outside Delaney Hall in Newark is the kind of fast‑moving story that tests a city’s patience and a federal agency’s credibility. Protesters say detainees inside are on hunger strike and suffering poor conditions. The Department of Homeland Security calls much of the reporting “false information.” Meanwhile, Newark has a curfew and nights of clashes with arrests. That’s the true news — and it deserves straight talk.

 

What’s happening at Delaney Hall?

Delaney Hall is an ICE detention facility under contract with a private operator. Protesters and immigrant‑rights groups say large numbers of detainees have launched a hunger strike and that the facility is denying proper medical care and visits. Those claims have sent crowds to the gates, where demonstrations repeatedly escalated into clashes. Local police and federal agents made dozens of arrests as the city imposed a temporary curfew to restore order.

 

Federal denials and local anger

The Department of Homeland Security pushed back hard, calling some outside claims “false information” and insisting detainees receive three meals a day and medical care. Secretary Markwayne Mullin has publicly disputed a facility‑wide hunger strike and defended ICE operations, saying the situation isn’t as dire as some activists claim. That official line matters — but so do the videos and eyewitness accounts showing pepper spray and pepper‑ball projectiles, and lawmakers from New Jersey demanding access and answers.

Why the Lafayette Park flashback keeps coming up

It’s no accident the Delaney Hall chaos is being mentioned alongside the Lafayette Park protests of six years ago. In 2020 the U.S. Secret Service said “more than 60” Uniformed Division officers and Special Agents were injured during demonstrations near the White House, and President Donald Trump was briefly moved to a secure location. The point critics make now is simple: similar unrest gets treated differently depending on who’s protesting and who the targets are. That’s a fair argument worth debating — but it shouldn’t let activists or agencies get a free pass on facts.

What should happen next?

Independent inspections of Delaney Hall are the obvious next step. Local officials, including Governor Mikie Sherrill, Mayor Ras J. Baraka and Senator Andy Kim, have pressed for access — and that’s the right move. If DHS and ICE want the public to believe their denials, they should open the doors to neutral monitors, release clear medical logs, and let impartial oversight settle disputes. If they won’t, the public and courts should step in.

We should all hope this ends without more injury or chaos. But let’s be blunt: protesters demanding humane treatment deserve honesty, and federal agencies defending detention practices deserve scrutiny. When crowds gather and federal forces push back, the facts must come first — not slogans, not spin, and certainly not political theater. If Delaney Hall blows up into a larger national crisis, it will be because someone refused to show the receipts.

 

CartoonDems