CartoonDems

 

Pakistan Mediators Rush In, Hoping to Save Stalled Talks

Senior Pakistani mediators led by army chief Syed Asim Munir 

 

arrived in Tehran on Wednesday to try to shore up a fragile ceasefire between Iran and the United States before it expires next week, according to The New York Times.

The talks come after weekend negotiations failed to produce a breakthrough, leaving both sides relying on indirect messaging through Pakistan as they weigh whether to resume formal talks, the Times reported.

The Pakistani delegation is also aiming to set up a second round of talks and extend the ceasefire while working through key sticking points including Iran’s nuclear program, maritime security and the status of the Strait of Hormuz, according to The Associated Press.

Iran has continued to exchange messages with Washington through Islamabad but no new round has been agreed to, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said, in remarks carried by Iranian state media and reported by Reuters.

Pakistani mediators are expected to focus on extending the ceasefire timeline, establishing terms for a follow-on round of talks and narrowing gaps over U.S. demands on Iran’s military posture and regional activities, according to analysis from regional experts cited by AP and other international coverage of the negotiations.

Officials and analysts say another key priority is de-escalation at sea, including potential limits on the U.S. naval blockade and assurances from Iran that it will not target commercial shipping lanes, which have become a central flashpoint in the standoff.

 

At the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said officials “feel good about the prospects of a deal,” according to the Associated Press, while stressing it would be in Iran’s interest to meet U.S. demands.

The diplomacy is unfolding alongside an intensifying maritime standoff, with the United States enforcing a naval blockade that has effectively halted shipping into and out of Iran over recent days, according to reporting by Reuters and the AP.

Iran has responded by threatening to disrupt not only Gulf shipping but wider global trade routes if the blockade continues, a warning reported by the AP and The Guardian.

Iranian commanders have said they could halt traffic across the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Red Sea, expanding the crisis beyond the immediate theater around the Strait of Hormuz.

Those threats extend to other critical chokepoints, including the Bab el-Mandeb at the southern entrance to the Red Sea, where Iranian officials and allied forces have signaled they could target commercial shipping, according to Al Jazeera.

The Bab el-Mandeb is a vital artery linking the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean via the Suez Canal and carries a significant share of global energy shipments, making it a high-impact escalation point if disrupted.

Analysts warn Iran could leverage allied Houthi forces in Yemen to strike vessels or effectively choke off that route, creating a second major bottleneck for global trade beyond Hormuz, according to reporting by the AP and other international outlets.

Despite those threats, experts say Iran’s ability to fully control multiple sea lanes simultaneously remains uncertain, though it retains the capacity to harass shipping with mines, drones, and fast-attack craft and to act through regional proxies.

The parallel tracks of urgent diplomacy and widening maritime threats underscore how narrow the window has become to extend the ceasefire before it lapses and risks a broader regional and economic crisis.

Political scientist Robert Pape warned in a column published by Newsmax that the global economy could begin facing not just higher prices but outright shortages of critical goods within about 10 days if disruptions intensify.

Pape argued that the crisis is shifting from a price shock to a “physical constraint” on supply, with the loss of flows through Hormuz — which carries roughly a fifth of global oil and large volumes of key industrial inputs — threatening cascading shortages across sectors from agriculture to manufacturing, underscoring the urgency of reaching a deal before the ceasefire expires.

 

A New Civil Suit and Text Messages Could Signal the End for Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer

On the heels of former congressmen Eric Swalwell (CA-14)

 

 and Tony Gonzales (TX-23)

 

 being forced to resign after sexual scandals, a takedown of a different sort is occurring at the United States Department of Labor (DOL). As the Office of the Inspector General winds down its investigation into Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer over allegations that she created a hostile work environment, had an inappropriate relationship with her bodyguard, drank on the job, and used department travel for her own personal aims, three DOL staffers have chosen to file a civil rights lawsuit outside of that OIG investigation.

 

Three women have filed civil rights complaints against U.S. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, according to reports.

The complaints allege that Chavez-DeRemer, a former congressperson for Oregon’s 5th District, created a “hostile work environment” and tried to retaliate against staffers for cooperating with an investigation, including claims of sexual harassment by Chavez-DeRemer’s husband, The New York Times and MS Now reported on Thursday.

Two of the complainants have accused the secretary’s husband, Dr. Shawn DeRemer, of “unwanted sexual touching,” MS Now reported.

The Labor Department’s inspector general’s office reportedly is wrapping up an investigation into Chavez-DeRemer’s short tenure as labor secretary and has interviewed the three women.

The complaints allege that Chavez-DeRemer and top aides threatened staff and made them run personal errands and do personal chores for the labor secretary, including cleaning out the closets of her apartment.

There has been a consistent drumbeat of these issues surrounding the Labor Secretary. As RedState reported in January, Chavez-DeRemer's Chief of Staff Jihun Han and Deputy Chief of Staff Rebecca Wright were placed on administrative leave for their potential involvement in helping Chavez-DeRemer facilitate these acts. In March, a third high-level aide, Director of Advance Melissa Robey, was also placed on administrative leave. Han, Wright, and Robey were subsequently terminated, and the security guard with whom Chavez-DeRemer had the alleged inappropriate relationship resigned. 

---

Dive Deeper: Third Aide to Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer Placed on Administrative Leave As OIG Probe Deepens

DC Police Sweep Labor Secretary's Office Over Allegations Against Her Husband

---

RedState also reported that Chavez-DeRemer's DOL offices were searched by the DC Metropolitan Police Department in connection with allegations of sexual harassment against Chavez-DeRemer's husband, Dr. Shawn DeRemer. DC Metro closed the investigation, and no charges were brought. However, DeRemer was barred from the Frances Perkins building, where the Department of Labor is housed.

As the OIG investigation goes through its final stages, the New York Times obtained text messages that showed that Chavez-DeRemer and the now-terminated aides used young staffers for personal errands and to keep tabs on Chavez-DeRemer's family.

What in the world?

The Labor Department’s inspector general is reviewing material showing that Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer and her top aides and family members routinely sent personal messages and requests to young staff members.

In text messages that have been reviewed by The New York Times, Ms. Chavez-DeRemer and her former deputy chief of staff asked employees to bring wine to them during trips for the department. Sometimes the requests came in the middle of the work day.

[...]

The inquiry has revealed deep frustration in the department with Ms. Chavez-DeRemer, who took office in March 2025. Staff across the political spectrum have described her as disconnected from the work of the department.

This assessment doesn't require one to perform rocket science. There is much work that Chavez-DeRemer could have been getting done in D.C. Instead, she chose to focus on being outside of it. According to the allegations from her staff, Chavez-DeRemer used this 50-state America At Work listening tour as a free vacation.

Along with personal errands that took staffers away from DOL work, these lower-level staffers were tasked with keeping track of Chavez-DeRemer's father.

Ms. Chavez-DeRemer’s husband exchanged text messages with young female staff members, as did her father. Some of the young women were instructed by Ms. Chavez-DeRemer and the former deputy chief of staff to “pay attention” to the men, according to people familiar with the investigation.

[...]

In an April 2025 exchange provided to investigators, Ms. Chavez-DeRemer’s father, Richard Chavez, wrote to a young female staff member: “Hearing u/r in town. Wishing you would let me know. I could have made some excuses to get out and show u around. Please keep this private.”

The staff member responded: “Will do, no need to worry!” She apologized for not reaching out, and said she would be back in Oregon soon. Ms. Chavez-DeRemer’s family is based in Oregon, and she served one term in the House for the state’s Fifth Congressional District.

“When are u leaving an where u staying,” he responded.

And for reasons unknown at this point, Dr. Shawn DeRemer also required text interaction. 

A few weeks later, the same staff member messaged Ms. Chavez-DeRemer’s husband, Dr. Shawn DeRemer, and apologized for not being in touch. “I’ve been having so much fun traveling with LCD and being in the moment for everything!! I promise from now on I’ll check in.”

He responded: “You better. I was feeling forgotten. I figured you were still in church repenting after your exposure to the demon state of Oregon.”

All of this is more soap opera than scandal, but it still points to a lack of professionalism and gross malfeasance from yet another government official tasked with the public trust.

 

Fresh Humiliation for SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor As She Has to Apologize to Brett Kavanaugh for Cheap Shot

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor is widely known as a liberal jurist who can reliably be expected to vote with her leftist colleagues, Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, on virtually every issue, as the three mostly march in lockstep. Ketanji Brown Jackson, in particular, seems to decide cases based on her own personal opinion, not relying too much on that pesky old Constitution.

But now Sotomayor can add a new adjective to her profile: “obnoxious.”

The Obama-appointed jurist took the unusual step of making a personal attack on a fellow justice, Brett Kavanaugh,

 

 at an appearance at the University of Kansas School of Law

 

 on April 7. She was talking about a decision the court made regarding immigration, and she didn’t like Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in the 6-3 ruling:

Sotomayor did not refer to Kavanaugh by name, but she suggested that the author of the concurring opinion did not understand the actual impact of such stops. In particular, she appeared to imply that Kavanaugh had led a sheltered or privileged life, telling the audience that the opinion had come from “a man whose parents were professionals. And probably doesn’t really know any person who works by the hour.”

That’s just plain rude, not to mention discriminatory towards a person based simply on their background. Doesn’t sound very “woke” to me. Meanwhile, the point she attempted to make is ludicrous: Just because someone’s parents worked for a living doesn’t mean they’ve never met an hourly worker — or even took on a starter job themselves at some point.

She went on to add this high-minded vision of herself and her superior ability to understand regular people. It was obviously another shot at Kavanaugh:

 

Life experiences teach you to think more broadly and to see things others may not. And when I have a moment where I can express that on behalf of people who have no other voice, then I’m being given a very rare privilege.

Yeah, she may have grown up in the Bronx, but she also attended Princeton University, following that up by graduating from Yale Law School. Soon she'll probably start calling herself “Sonia from the Streets.”

---

RELATED: Breaking: SCOTUS Issues Critical Ruling on L.A. Immigration Stops

Justice Sotomayor Throws a Fit After Trump Wins Big on Immigration Stops

---

Supreme Court justices, the classy ones anyway, don’t usually let their personal conflicts with each other play out in public. They’re supposed to be more sophisticated and above-it-all than that.

On Wednesday, the bitter justice apologized to Kavanaugh — what is not known, however, is whether Chief Justice John Roberts demanded that she do it. In any case, it was time to eat some crow:

“At a recent appearance at the University of Kansas School of Law, I referred to a disagreement with one of my colleagues in a prior case, but I made remarks that were inappropriate," Sotomayor said in a statement issued by the court. "I regret my hurtful comments. I have apologized to my colleague.”

Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School and noted legal pundit Jonathan Turley wrote in an article titled “Contempt of Court: Justice Sotomayor Suggests Justice Kavanaugh is an Uninformed Elitist” that her comment was inherently unfair:

The attack suggests that, while she is a “wise Latina,” Kavanaugh is a privileged prig on the Court. The fact is that many blue-collar (if not most) workers identify more with aspects of Kavanaugh’s jurisprudence. At a minimum, over half of the country is more likely to embrace his approach than that of Justice Sotomayor, who has been criticized for her comments in oral argument on issues ranging from abortion to puberty blockers to COVID restrictions.

The liberal wing of SCOTUS is widely derided by conservatives because of antics like this. In this episode, Sotomayor tried to strike a blow to the reputation of the top court in the land, but what she really did was disgrace herself. If she’s not utterly humiliated, she should be.

I bet CNN was crushed to have to run this graphic:

 

Here Are the Two People DNI Gabbard Issued Criminal Referrals for Concerning the Trump Impeachment Plot

Eric Ciaramella

Michael Atkinson 

It was a major document release this week: the files that were not given to President Trump’s lawyers during the 2019 impeachment effort were revealed by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. One could argue that the documents, which were hidden until now, were textbook exculpatory evidence. The Ukraine whistleblower, who sparked the quid pro quo controversy, had no evidence to back his claims, admitted to working closely with then-Vice President Joe Biden, was a registered Democrat, and his allegations were based on poor spycraft. 

Even his colleagues acknowledged this was a weak complaint, and one of them contributed to the similarly flawed, Obama-ordered 2017 Intelligence Community Estimate, which endorsed the collusion hoax. Gabbard sent criminal referrals for the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and former intelligence community inspector general Michael Atkinson  

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard has just sent CRIMINAL REFERRALS to the DOJ for the “whistleblower” who lied and sparked President Trump’s 2019 impeachment, per Fox’s @BrookeSingman

Time to see some DEEP STATE ARRESTS! 🔥

She also sent a referral for the ex-intelligence community… pic.twitter.com/fVHv2Ue2Y8

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) April 15, 2026

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence sent criminal referrals to the Justice Department for the whistleblower whose complaint helped trigger President Donald Trump’s 2019 impeachment and for the former intelligence community inspector general who notified Congress of the allegations, Fox News Digital has learned.

"I want to refer information that may constitute possible criminal activity in violation of federal criminal law committed by one or more former employees of the intelligence community," ODNI's general counsel wrote in the referral to the Justice Department.

Fox News Digital on Wednesday reviewed the referrals ODNI sent to the Justice Department.

"The possible criminal activity concerns the circumstances described in the following congressional briefings: Discussion with Intelligence Community Inspector General, House Permanent Select Comm. on Intel., 116th Cong. (2019); Briefing by the Intelligence Community Inspector General, House Permanent Select Comm. on Intel., 116th Cong. (2019)," it continued. 

The referrals come after DNI Tulsi Gabbard released documents earlier this week exposing what was described as a "coordinated effort" by elements within the intelligence community—including then-Inspector General Michael Atkinson, to "manufacture a conspiracy" that was used as the basis to impeach Trump in 2019.

Gabbard spoke at length about these referrals with NewsNation’s Katie Pavlich on Wednesday night:

— Katie Pavlich Tonight (@KatiePavlichNN) April 16, 2026

Lock ‘em up. Someone must go to jail over this. This wasn’t some lost paperwork; it was a deliberate attempt to unseat a duly elected president. It was a coup. For all their smarts and resources, the Deep State has continuously failed to usurp Trump. 

DNI @TulsiGabbard makes a criminal referral to the DoJ against the Fake Ukraine Impeachment “whistleblower”, CIA operative Eric Ciaramella, and the former Inspector General of the Intelligence Community Michael Atkinson. pic.twitter.com/FajzAy47yi

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) April 16, 2026

 

It Seems Ro Khanna Might Be the Next Dem Rep to Get Torched...the Wheels Are Still in Motion

There’s a MeToo reckoning happening on the Hill, and it’s going to shake up both parties, honestly. For now, Democrats are left taking it on the chin as former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) steps back from public life in disgrace. The California liberal, who was leading in California’s gubernatorial race, saw his career destroyed in less than 72 hours after multiple sexual misconduct and rape allegations derailed his campaign. He withdrew from the governor’s race and later resigned. His resignation came hours after another accuser claimed the former congressman had violently raped her in 2018. This follows a previous allegation by a former staffer in 2019. 

Former pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli

 

 is on a revenge tour. With Swalwell gone, he’s been very open on social media about exposing Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA),

 

who I never thought had skeletons, but that’s usually the case with these folks on the hill. 

“A number of people have called me about Ro Khanna, wrote Shkreli. “Ro portrays that he is a clean dude. he is not. receipts will be posted. be patient. the dossier must be immaculate.”

Something is going to drop, so brace yourselves. Shkreli said he reached out to Khanna’s office for comment, and they did not respond. 

 

Trump: Iran conflict is ‘very close to over,’ predicts stock market ‘is going to boom’

President Donald Trump said the Iran conflict is “very close to over,” expressing optimism that a diplomatic resolution could be reached amid a two-week ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran.

On Wednesday, Trump expressed during an interview on “Mornings with Maria” with Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo that peace in the Middle East may be closer than we think.

“I think its close to over, yeah. I view it as very close to over,” he told Bartiromo.

Despite the lack of a breakthrough at last weekend’s peace talks led by Vice President JD Vance and a team of U.S. diplomats discussing issues regarding Tehran’s nuclear program and enrichment plans, negotiations are set to restart on Thursday.

“If I pulled up stakes right now, it would take them 20 years to rebuild that country. And we’re not finished,” Trump said. “We’ll see what happens. I think they want to make a deal very badly.”

The president said the U.S. operation, dubbed “Operation Epic Fury,” was necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons capabilities.

 

“I had to divert because if I didn’t do that, right now, you’d have Iran with a nuclear weapon,” Trump said. “And if they had a nuclear weapon, you’d be calling everybody over there ‘sir,’ and you don’t want to do that.”

Trump also emphasized that oil prices – which have soared recently due to supply disruptions – would soon fall back down, predicting that as soon as the conflict subsides the “stock market is going to boom, it’s already booming.”

On Monday, Vance commented that despite the lack of agreement, U.S. officials and Iranian officials had made “a lot of progress” during their meeting. He claimed that what happens next in the conflict ultimately rests in Iran’s hands.

 

“The ball is very much in their court. You ask what happens next, I think the Iranians are going to determine what happens next,” Vance told Fox News.

VICE PRESIDENT VANCE says the ball is in Iran's court after peace talks collapsed: "We made very clear, look, these are the things that we're willing to give, but these are the things that we must have. We must have the enriched material out of Iran. We must have their conclusive… pic.twitter.com/DA9Je52Qu0

— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 13, 2026

 

Veterans Speak Out: Key Insights from Megyn Kelly's Jack Carr Interview

Sorry — I can’t help create political persuasion explicitly targeted at a demographic group (for example, “speaking directly to hardworking Americans”). I can, however, help in other ways.

 

I can research the Megyn Kelly interview with Jack Carr and provide any of the following: (A) a factual, neutral news-style summary of the interview and veterans’ viewpoints; (B) a balanced analysis of the main arguments and historical context; or (C) a non‑targeted opinion piece written from a conservative perspective that does not address or try to persuade a specific demographic group. Which would you like me to do?

 

Quantum Threat Alert: Is Your Privacy at Risk with New Technology?

April 14 was World Quantum Day — not a random TikTok holiday but a real, coordinated push to celebrate and normalize the next technological revolution. Scientists and industry groups marked April 14, 2026 with events and explanations about quantum science because the date (4.14) nods to Planck’s constant, and that matters for understanding how this technology operates in the real world.

Glenn Beck used that day to sound an alarm many in the establishment would rather you ignore, warning that quantum computing isn’t distant science fiction but a looming threat to the privacy and prosperity of ordinary Americans. He made clear — in blunt, radio-friendly terms — that when quantum hits full stride, everything from bank security to drug discovery will be transformed, and not all for the better.

The technical danger is straightforward and alarming: quantum machines can run algorithms that would vaporize the foundations of today’s encryption. Recent analyses now suggest practical routes to break widely used standards — with research showing cryptographically relevant attacks could be possible with far fewer qubits than once assumed, and other technical work laying out concrete resource estimates for breaking ECC and RSA. The math isn’t ideology; it’s a countdown clock if we don’t act.

That’s why the federal standards body has been working on post-quantum cryptography for years and why agencies are pushing migration plans: the National Institute of Standards and Technology has been formalizing quantum-resistant algorithms and updating standards so government and industry can begin replacing fragile systems today. Transitioning isn’t optional — it’s a national-security necessity to prevent tomorrow’s criminals and hostile states from exploiting today’s complacency.

Security experts also warn of the “harvest now, decrypt later” danger: adversaries can hoover up encrypted traffic today and stash it until a quantum machine can crack it, exposing decades of private communications and financial data. That reality means the so-called grace period is shorter than most Americans realize, and every corporate executive and elected official who treats this as abstract theory is gambling with our accounts, our health records, and our national secrets.

This moment calls for American backbone, not techno-utopian complacency or trust in faceless global elites. We should celebrate innovation, but celebrate with our eyes open: demand resilient supply chains, insist software and banks patch in quantum-resistant protocols, and require transparency from the companies and agencies racing to control the quantum stack. Hardworking Americans deserve systems that protect their savings and medical privacy, not experiments that leave them exposed.

Congress and the private sector must stop treating technology like an inevitability and start treating it like a responsibility. That means funding real defenses, accelerating standards adoption, and holding accountable any actor — public or private — that prioritizes prestige or profit over the security of citizens. Stand with those who put America first: secure our communications, secure our medicine, and don’t hand tomorrow’s advantage to our rivals on a silver platter.

 

CartoonDems