CartoonDems

 

Texas Poll: Talarico, Abbott Lead, but Race Tight

Democrat James Talarico holds a narrow lead over Republican Ken Paxton in Texas' U.S. Senate race, while Republican Gov. Greg Abbott leads Democrat Gina Hinojosa in his reelection bid, according to a University of Houston poll released Monday.

The Hobby School of Public Affairs survey found Talarico leading Paxton 48% to 46%, with Libertarian Ted Brown receiving 3% and another 3% undecided.

Abbott leads Hinojosa 49% to 46%, with Libertarian Pat Dixon receiving 2% and 3% undecided.

Both races are within the poll's margin of error of plus or minus 2.19 percentage points, underscoring the competitive political environment in a state where Republicans have dominated statewide elections for more than three decades.

The survey of 2,000 likely Texas voters was conducted Oct. 10-14, ahead of early voting beginning Monday for the Nov. 3 midterm elections.

Despite Talarico's narrow Senate advantage, Republicans lead in all seven other statewide contests surveyed.

Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick leads Democrat Vikki Goodwin 47% to 42%, while Republican attorney general candidate Mayes Middleton holds an identical 47%-42% advantage over Democrat Nathan Johnson.

Republican comptroller candidate Don Huffines leads Democrat Sarah Eckhardt 47% to 40%, while Republican Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham leads Democrat Benjamin Flores by the same margin.

 

Republican agriculture commissioner candidate Nate Sheets leads Democrat Clayton Tucker 46% to 40%, while Republican railroad commissioner candidate Bo French holds a narrower 45%-43% advantage over Democrat Jon Rosenthal.

The Senate race reveals significant divisions among voters.

Paxton leads Talarico among rural voters, 64% to 27%, and among voters 55 and older, 58% to 38%.

Talarico holds a 60%-36% advantage among urban voters and leads among voters ages 18-34, 71% to 19%.

The Democrat also leads among independents, 60% to 32%, while Paxton receives support from 88% of Republicans, compared with Talarico's 98% support among Democrats.

President Donald Trump remains a major factor in the Senate contest.

Among Paxton supporters, 59% said their vote was in support of Trump, while 68% of Talarico supporters said their vote was in opposition to the president.

The survey also found widespread support for election security measures.

An overwhelming 86% of likely Texas voters support requiring photo identification to vote in person, while 70% expressed confidence that the November election would be conducted fairly and accurately.

The findings suggest Republicans remain competitive across the statewide ballot, although the closely watched Senate contest could depend on turnout and the remaining undecided voters.

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 

Oh My: Surprising Poll Numbers on That New York AG Race - Letitia James Isn't Going to Like This

The Republicans have been doing very well in the debates this election season. 

We've seen Republican Mike Rogers hand Democrat Abdul El-Sayed his head in the Michigan Senate debate. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) pummeled Democrat Troy Jackson in all four of their debates in the Maine Senate race. Most recently, we saw Republican Michele Tafoya curb-stomp Democrat Peggy Flanagan in the Minnesota Senate debate. 

But perhaps the best debate of them all came from former federal prosecutor Saritha Komatireddy (R) in the race for Attorney General of New York. She crushed the current AG, Democrat Letitia James. 

Given all the horrible things Letitia James has done, who could not love this moment? 

What a statement that was, too, from James. 

Komatireddy was brilliant, with facts and fingers at the ready, destroying James right and left.

All James did was stand there looking clueless, and all she could say was, "Trump." At this point, even some people in blue states have to be tired of Democrats not having any solutions and just hating on President Donald Trump. 

Now a new poll is out, and it's pretty stunning. Turns out people may actually be getting the message. 

Lefty incumbent state Attorney General  Letitia James’ lead over GOPer Saritha Komatireddy has shrunk to just 6 points after the underdog’s strong debate performance, a bombshell Republican internal poll shows.

James now leads Komatireddy by just 50.7% to 44.7% — half of the Democratic AG’s 13-point spread in a Siena University survey last month, according to the new poll conducted for the GOP candidate and obtained by The Post.

About 4% of voters remain undecided, the latest survey found.

That's a huge move from last month when Komatireddy was 13 points behind, and it is likely because the debate showed that people could finally have a competent AG. In August, she was 18 points behind. So she's definitely closing in leaps and bounds. 

“The final three weeks are about one thing: putting Saritha in front of the voters who have not seen her yet, because the  ones who saw her debate are breaking to her by four to one.’’

One in five likely voters  surveyed said they watched the  debate.

Among those who watched, Komatireddy scores with them 81% to 19%. the poll showed.

Komatireddy now leads James among independents, 49 percent to 43 percent.

Komatireddy is winning areas where Republicans need to perform well.

She leads James on Long Island 57% to 41% and the broader downstate suburbs 54% to 44% and upstate 50% to 44%.

James is ahead because of her huge margin in New York City, where she bests Komatireddy 65% to 30%.

Komatireddy leads among men 53% to 43%,  non-college voters 50% to 45%, and in terms of voters ages 46 to 55, 51% to 46%, according to the survey. The memo did not specify James’s lead among women.

It's going to be a challenge, but she has momentum, unlike James. She's what's really needed in that position - a truly good prosecutor who cares about getting the job done, not the political hack that James is. 

Credit: redstate.com 

 

'They Didn't Listen': Trump and Vance Urge Macron to Take Drastic Measure After Missed Warnings

France's worst unrest in years has reached the point where its president is preparing to address the nation, historic buildings have gone up in flames, and hundreds of thousands of demonstrators have flooded the streets.

Now President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance have an urgent message for Emmanuel Macron. And they aren't offering the French president another carefully worded diplomatic statement.

The latest confrontation follows weeks of demonstrations over soaring living costs, deteriorating school conditions, and anger at the French government. Saturday brought another wave of violence, with masked rioters attacking police, setting fires, looting businesses, and damaging public buildings.

As RedState's Nick Arama reported, the destruction included the historic City Hall in Limoges, a building dating to the 19th century that was largely destroyed by fire. French authorities have blamed radical far-left groups for some of the worst violence, while the government faces growing pressure over its handling of the crisis.

And on Sunday, Trump gave his assessment.

"France is burning!" the president wrote on Truth Social.

"The immigration of people from an entirely different world, people with hatred in their hearts, has shattered that once great country. Close your Borders and take control, before it is too late!"

Trump is pointing to the rioting and looting as the results of open borders policies. Vice President J.D. Vance was equally forceful.

"Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion," Vance wrote on X.

"They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen."

Vance shared footage of the burning Limoges City Hall, which was built in 1883.

"I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn," he added.

"And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country."

The remarks came as the Élysée Palace announced that Macron would deliver a solemn national address at 8 PM Sunday, following meetings with Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu and other senior officials.

The speech was scheduled against a backdrop of sweeping destruction. In Paris, demonstrators clashed with riot police as cars and rubbish bins burned. Shops were vandalized, and smoke filled the streets.

In Lyon, rioters set fire to the city's historic tourism office. In Marseille, vandals attacked public buildings and knocked over a bust of Marianne, the symbolic figure of the French Republic.

The Louvre, one of the world's most famous museums, also announced its closure amid the disruption.

"Dear visitors, due to student strikes the museum is currently closed," the institution told visitors.

The "mostly peaceful" student movement in question.

Hundreds of videos circulating from France show mayhem, rioting, and looting being carried out primarily by Northern African and Middle Eastern migrants. French officials themselves have pointed to organized political extremists.

Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez blamed "extremely violent, radical far-left groups" for stoking violence during demonstrations that often began peacefully. Prime Minister Lecornu has also accused elements of the hard left of attempting to exploit the unrest ahead of France's April 2027 presidential election.

As I reported Saturday, the political backdrop includes an increasingly bitter contest between Marine Le Pen's National Rally and the hard-left movement led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Mélenchon's La France Insoumise party has actively supported the demonstrations, seeking to channel anger over economic conditions and public services into political support.

French officials have accused the party of using the protests for electoral purposes, an allegation that Mélenchon, being a lying socialist, has disputed. 

Macron now faces the task of addressing all of them while restoring public confidence in the government's ability to maintain order. And with the 2027 presidential election approaching, the unrest is already shaping the political debate.

Trump and Vance are warning France to take drastic measures to protect its nation; but the target audience is Americans who should see the rioting as a preview of what will happen if Democrats again take charge.

Credit: redstate.com 

 

Good News: Islam Lost

It may sound wrong, but just give me a few minutes of your time.

One of my favorite movie scenes comes from Night at the Museum. The little figures are deflating a tire of the getaway car. For them, it’s hurricane-force winds blowing them off of the spear one at a time. The scene then cuts to a wider view where we see and hear nothing. At the micro level, there is bedlam and challenge. At the macro level, nothing.

France is burning. There is no shortage of videos from Paris and other metropolitan areas showing looting, destruction, fire, and attacks on the police. It all looks horrific. And as usual, many of the perpetrators are Muslims, either direct immigrants or second/third generation descendants of those who came from France’s former African colonies. The destruction looks so massive, and the police seem so small and weak. President Macron puts out meaningless statements while being all but invisible during a national crisis. Is the game over? Are we getting close to game over? I think so, but not as most of us have imagined and predicted (including yours truly).

In the past, Islam has conquered other countries, oftentimes Christian, either through war or population growth. The war side of things mostly ended over a thousand years ago. The population side has, as one of its most recent victims, Lebanon. The Maronite Catholic country was a wonder. People called Beirut the Paris of the Middle East while a friend rued that today Paris is the Beirut of Europe. The Lebanese Civil War pretty much ended any discussion of power-sharing or an even Christian-Muslim balance. Today, a seriously weakened Hezbollah still calls the shots, and while Lebanese politicians like to criticize the Iranian terror group, they don’t have the power or gumption to do anything meaningful about weakening its grip on the country. Some want Israel to do their dirty work and get rid of the Shiite terrorists. Anyone looking for a cheap beeper?

In Europe and the US, Muslim presence has grown significantly. For years, “Mohammed” has been the #1 name for baby boys in England. Now other Muslim names are climbing the list. Still, the percentage of Muslims as a part of the total population is relatively small: 1.6 percent in the US and between 6 to 8 percent in most Western European countries. The proper program for the Muslims should have been to wait until their numbers grew to significant double digits and then simply take over the country via births, elections, and sheer numbers. But they are an impatient lot, and they moved too early. The violence in Paris will lead to a situation in which, in a few years, Marine Le Pen will be the most left-leaning politician in the country. Those who may have been indifferent or even supported uncontrolled immigration from the third world are going to see the destruction in their cities — and even in their own stores — and decide that enough is enough. In the months after the slaughter of Israelis in primarily left-leaning kibbutzim in the south, the remaining residents sounded more extreme than Itamar Ben-Gvir in their hatred of Hamas and Palestinians. Many said that Israel should just kill them all. The same feeling and outlook are on their way to Europe. It’s one thing to throw on a keffiyeh and protest against the government and Israel. It’s another thing to see your source of income destroyed and wonder if the insurance will cover your car-turned-toaster.

Is Hamas stronger today than it was three years ago? Are Palestinian prospects for power and statehood better today than they were three years ago? The Muslims in Europe were not supposed to riot so violently for another decade or so, but they couldn’t help themselves. They saw student protests and began to destroy buildings and loot like there’s no tomorrow. All of the high-end stores in Paris are now just empty buildings. The problem for them, and the possible blessing in disguise for Western civilization, is that the Muslim population in Europe is still too small to take over. The people of France and beyond will do their all to stop new entries and begin to send home old ones. They blew it, just as Hamas had a thrill of “conquering” a chunk of Israel for a day and then getting its butt kicked by all branches of the IDF. If Israel had just taken 70 percent of Gaza out of the blue, the world would have gone ballistic. After the murder of 1,200 people, nobody has offered Israel a better solution than the one that has been applied to Gaza.

Now it is possible that the French are dumb and lefty enough not to learn from the present “troubles”. In such a case, the Muslims deserve to win against such a stupid and witless opponent. But I think that the French might just come around and decide that enough is enough. There are no reports of dead from the violence, but the destruction is enormous and quite visible. The last report I saw had 150 police officers injured. How would you feel if your car was a charred wreck? How are you going to vote now that your family business of 100 years no longer exists? Did you enjoy seeing your public buildings trashed and burned to the ground? The Muslims gained nothing but feelz by going wild and destroying everything in their path, but they are going to be downstream of the political fallout to come. The Palestinians jumped up and down on October 7. Now they can’t work in Israel, 70 percent of Gaza is under IDF control, and Israel is not transferring billions in VAT money that it is supposed to give the Palestinian Authority (PA) according to treaty agreements. PA leaders (laughing now like Tucker: HAHAHAHAHAHA) can’t even get into the US for the UN meeting — even the Iranians got visas! The Palestinians loved the moment; Israeli families are still mourning, but nobody is talking about two states anymore. The Palestinians enjoyed the violence but lost their future. The same will be true in France and the rest of Europe.

Everything written above is based on the condition that the Europeans are not so left-wing demented that they will simply repaint their burned-down buildings and say nothing happened. That’s what the UN tried to do regarding October 7^th, but Israelis from political wall-to-wall were not having it. If the Europeans are not so stupid and suicidal as to let this pass, they will begin to elect politicians whose entire platform is throwing out as many illegal aliens and troublemakers as possible. The people will demand that immigration laws be enforced, and if a few dinghies are sunk, so be it. Israel was hit hard, shocked, and got back on its feet. After a thousand years of Christendom, can France and the rest of Europe do the same? I am hopeful that they will. The violence of the past few days is not the kind that can easily be swept under the rug. People are lefties until they are harmed and start to think differently. Look at all of the people who lost their jobs under Bush and Obama running to vote for Donald Trump, who promised — and kept his promise — to bring manufacturing back to the US. If I owned the Sephora store that just got looted, I might offer Marine Le Pen a lifetime supply of cosmetics.

Never underestimate the stupidity of modern, leftist man. The French might just lose to an opponent with less than 10 percent of the population. Maybe the French have run out of gas and just want to hand over the torch. Or maybe they still have some fight left in them and will return France to its place of grandeur.

Credit: townhall.com

 

 

Keith Ellison Denies He Called Republicans and Independents Racists and Bigots, but It's on Video

Back at the end of September, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison took part in an event where he called the Republicans and independents supporting his opponent Ron Schutz "bigots and racists."

"Let me just tell you, my last poll, I was down against my opponent by two points," Ellison said at the time. "I don't know if you know that. It's true. My opponent is beating me by two points right now. I don't know if it's an accurate poll or not. I do know this: I take it seriously. And I hope you all take it seriously, too."

"Because this is what you call a base election. Do you know what a base election is? That means whoever gets out their base, that's who's going to win," he went on. "Now is the base of people who believe in freedom and justice, compassion and mercy. Will the people who believe in the equality of human beings, in the dignity of all human beings, show up and vote?"

"Or will the bigots and the racists show up and vote? You know what I'm saying? Either we gonna show up or they gonna show up," Ellison said.

That's not smart during a tight election campaign and now Ellison is denying he said what we all saw on video.

🚨 WATCH: Keith Ellison is asked to apologize for calling Republicans and Independents racists and bigots for not supporting his candidacy.

He denies it happened despite Ron Schutz reading Ellison’s statement verbatim to him.

Insane. pic.twitter.com/L9nVmHime5

— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) October 17, 2026

"Yeah, I'd like to know if he's going to apologize for making a comment that all my supporters are racists and bigots," Schutz said. "I asked at the beginning. I want an answer to that."

The moderator asked Schutz to provide context.

"On the 22nd of September, he was filmed on video at an event at the Minneapolis Convention Center. And he goes on, talks about a poll result says my opponent's ahead, he's beating me by two points, and then he says, 'because this is what you call a base election. Do you know what a base election is? That means whoever gets out their base, that's who's going to win. Now is the base of people who believe in freedom and justice, compassion and mercy. Will the people who believe in the equality of human beings, in the dignity of all human beings, show up and vote? Or will the bigots and the racists show up and vote?'"

That's exactly what Ellison said. 

"How can you interpret that otherwise?" Schutz asked the moderator. 

"I'm not going to buy into your deliberate misconstruction of what I said," Ellison said.

"I read it exactly," Schutz replied.

"And you're right, I'm asking for people who care about freedom and justice and mercy to show up and vote," Ellison said. 

"But you called anyone who's not voting for you a racist and a bigot," Schutz said. "He did it and can't deny it."

"Ron, let me tell you man, any sensible person knows that you're misconstruing," Ellison said. 

We are not misconstruing anything. Ellison said it. He meant it. Now he's lying.

 

It's on video.

Ellison has been getting away with this for years and years; why wouldn't he lie? His idiot voters will still support him because they know he has to lie, and they like that he says those terrible things.

— 👻The🐰FOO🎃 (@PolitiBunny) October 17, 2026

Bingo.

What a dishonest and reprehensible coward. https://t.co/hb8ClCcEoX

— Blame Big Government (@BlameBigGovt) October 17, 2026

That sums it up.

We’ve played the clip on the air. He said it. He’s a liar. https://t.co/lwVUGJ165N

— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) October 17, 2026

He's absolutely lying. He knows he's lying, and he knows that we know that he's lying. But no one in the mainstream media will hold him accountable. Democrats won't condemn him, and he'll continue lying in the hopes of winning reelection.

Credit: townhall.com

 

 

‘Great Warrior Prime Minister’: Trump endorses Netanyahu ahead of Israel elections

President Donald Trump threw his support behind Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the upcoming Israeli elections, issuing him a glowing endorsement.

In a Sunday Truth Social post, Trump stated that Netanyahu withheld under pressure and was a valuable partner to the United States, especially regarding the threat of Iran.

“To the Great People of Israel: Bibi Netanyahu has been a Great Warrior Prime Minister, and an even greater Partner for Peace in combatting the Islamic Republic of Iran, with its 51 year old chant, ‘Death to Israel, Death to America! We will destroy the Little Satan and the Big Satan,’” the U.S. commander-in-chief stated. “What Country can survive when things such as this are allowed to be said, because eventually, they always end up being true?”

“Bibi Netanyahu has been Strong, Brave, and Brilliant in the face of tremendous opposition, including that coming from even Israel, itself. Despite all of that, he has endured and, in fact, he has thrived!” he continued. “! I have watched Bibi under the most trying of times. Normal men or women in such situations would have wilted under the pressure – But Bibi did not wilt, he actually got stronger, and maintains that same Strength today. This is the kind of Partner that the United States of America is demanding of Israel, a Country for which it has done so much.

 

“Please let this Letter serve to represent my Complete and Total Endorsement of Bibi Netanyahu in his upcoming Race for Re-Election as Prime Minister of Israel. BIBI NETANYAHU WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!” he added.

Less than two weeks away from Israel’s election, the U.S. president further outlined the purported consequences of electing an ill-fitted leader for the Mediterranean nation.

“It would have been only a question of time until Iran would have put that ominous phrase into effect, but they have been systematically destroyed, both Militarily and Financially, and unless they change their ways, rapidly, we will soon finish the job. If Israel has the wrong Leader, which would be anyone other than Bibi, America will have to do this work ourselves, and I am not inclined to do so,” he said.

 

Following Trump’s endorsement, Netanyahu expressed his gratitude for the backing, also outlining the shared goal between the U.S. and Israel of ensuring the Islamic Republic never obtains a nuclear weapon.

“There’s never been a greater friend of Israel in the White House. That’s an understatement, not by the longest shot,” Netanyahu said.

“But I think America has been fortunate to have a leader of conviction, of clarity, of courage, who faces down this threat to America and to Israel,” he continued. “You’re focused—laser-focused on the task of removing this threat from this current generation of Americans, from all future generations.”

Israel’s elections are set for October 27^th, where Israelis cast their votes for a party rather than a specific candidate, with the leader of the party that won the most votes most likely to become the next prime minister — though the process is not straightforward, the Times of Israel explained.

Trump’s endorsement of Netanyahu is not unique for the American president, as he has thrown his support behind several foreign leaders, including Abelardo de la Espriella, who recently was elected president of Colombia, and Argentinian President Javier Milei.

Credit: oan.com 

 

Newt Gingrich’s America’s Golden Age: Tech, Trumpism, Who Wins?

Newt Gingrich showed up on Life, Liberty & Levin this week with a simple pitch: be an optimist. He’s turned that pitch into a book — America’s Golden Age — and he’s betting that technology plus what he calls “Trumpism” can kick-start a new era of growth. Love him or roll your eyes, he’s trying to reshape hope into a policy playbook, and that deserves a look.

Gingrich’s case for optimism

On Mark Levin’s show, Gingrich laid out a future powered by AI, robotics, advanced materials, biological science and small modular nuclear reactors — technologies he says can outrun “bloated” bureaucracy. The publisher (Center Street/Hachette) bills the book as a roadmap for turning those breakthroughs into national renewal, and the jacket copy is plastered with praise from President Trump and top conservative voices. That’s not accidental PR; it’s an argument dressed up for the audience most likely to act on it.

What Gingrich means in plain terms is this: cheaper, more reliable energy could revive factories; smart automation could bring jobs back in new forms; better biotech could extend healthy years for Americans. For a small-town manufacturer juggling sky-high electricity bills or a nurse watching promising longevity treatments move through red tape, those are not abstract ideas — they’re practical stakes. Optimism matters when it’s about people getting more work, more security, and a shot at a better life.

Politics meets futurism

Make no mistake, this is political marketing as much as it is futurism. The book ties a pro‑Trump agenda to a technocratic optimism: loosen regulations, speed approvals, and let the private sector sprint. That appeals to voters fed up with slow government and hungry for results — but it also raises real questions about oversight and safety when regulators are told to move faster.

Conservative voters who distrust elites should want both things: the freedom for innovation to flourish and the accountability that keeps citizens safe. The trade-offs are real. Faster approvals for AI or novel medical therapies can mean faster cures — and faster mistakes. The policy debate Gingrich wants to reframe will be deciding who gets to set the rules: elected officials accountable to voters, or technocrats and big corporations operating on their own timetable.

 

Why the timing matters

Gingrich is releasing this book right when the debate over the country’s direction is at its loudest, and that’s not an accident. The publisher’s push, the TV appearances, and the endorsements are a coordinated effort to plant a hopeful, action-oriented story in conservative hearts before voters make their choices. An in-person launch was even planned with the Reagan Foundation — then postponed — which shows the logistical scramble behind turning ideas into movements.

For ordinary Americans, the takeaway is simple: ideas that sound big and inspiring can change the rules of daily life. If small modular reactors lower utility costs, a factory floor hums again. If AI boosts productivity, wages could rise — or the work could disappear. That’s where optimism has to meet realism: will policy protect workers, consumers, and communities as the tech revolution accelerates?

The quiet test

Gingrich asks conservatives to be optimists. Fair enough — optimism beats fatalism. But optimism without a plan for oversight, without attention to who wins and who loses, is just a pep rally. Will the movement he champions pair ambition with structures that protect everyday Americans, or will it hand unchecked power to whoever moves fastest?

That’s the real question his book forces us to face: can hopeful rhetoric be turned into durable policy that improves lives, or will it simply rearrange who benefits?

Credit:  https://patriotpowerednetwork.com/

 

Feds Raid Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Home as Denaturalization Probe Begins

The feds showed up at Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington home with a court‑authorized search warrant, and the picture is now unmistakable: Homeland Security Investigations carried out a seizure that included a cellphone, notebooks and even a passport while grand‑jury subpoenas went out to relatives. That kind of federal action doesn’t happen in a political vacuum — and it forces a blunt question: do rules apply to everyone, or only to some?

What happened, in plain terms

Agents from DOJ’s HSI executed a judicially approved search and removed electronic devices, documents and a passport from Omar’s residence in Washington. Reporters say prosecutors have issued grand‑jury subpoenas to family members and are probing alleged irregularities tied to immigration paperwork; no criminal charges have been filed against the congresswoman yet. A federal judge has already imposed limits — ordering a screening process to keep any legislative materials protected by the Speech‑or‑Debate Clause out of investigators’ hands — which will narrow and slow what investigators can use.

Why this matters beyond the headlines

The investigators reportedly are looking at how Omar became a U.S. citizen, and officials tell reporters they’re trying to build a record that could support denaturalization — a rare, messy and legally tricky step that’s been used more under the current DOJ. That’s not academic for ordinary Americans who care about border security and the integrity of the naturalization process; if someone lied to get citizenship, the system needs to correct it. But denaturalization is civil and complicated, and it carries big constitutional questions — so it’s no surprise judges are putting guardrails around how material tied to a sitting lawmaker gets handled.

Politics, posture and possible consequences

On cable this week, Republicans pushed hard: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna called for accountability, former ICE official Tom Homan argued denaturalization should be on the table if fraud is proven, and House Majority Whip Tom Emmer criticized Omar’s fundraising off the raid. Calls to strip committee assignments are loud in conservative media and among some House Republicans, but those are procedural moves that require formal House action — not just TV heat. Democrats say the raid looks like weaponization of federal power and point to the timing near an election; whether that’s true or rhetoric, the optics are raw and voters notice.

What to watch next

The practical next steps are familiar: lawyers will challenge the warrant and the seizure, motions will be filed over the judge’s screening order, and prosecutors will decide whether they have enough for criminal charges or to start a civil denaturalization suit. Ordinary people — taxpayers who expect fair enforcement and citizens who want stable immigration rules — should track whether DOJ treats this as a serious criminal probe or lets politics steer the narrative. Either way, Minnesotans in the 5th District and voters nationwide will be paying attention, because the stakes are about law, trust and equal treatment under it.

We should all want a justice system that can investigate a member of Congress without turning into a partisan circus — and we should want accountability if laws were broken. Which do we get: a careful, impartial process that respects constitutional limits, or a headline‑first spectacle that leaves more questions than answers?

Credit:  https://patriotpowerednetwork.com/

 

CartoonDems