Conservative Blogger
Sunday, March 29, 2026
Report: Pentagon Preparing for Weeks of Ground Operations in Iran
The Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, the Washington Post reported Saturday, citing U.S. officials. The plans could involve raids by Special Operations and conventional infantry troops, the Post reported. Whether President Donald Trump would approve any of those plans remains uncertain, according to the Post. The Trump administration has deployed U.S. Marines to the Middle East as the war in Iran stretches into its fifth week, and also has been planning to send thousands of soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne to the region. Officials said any ground mission would likely be limited in scope
and could involve raids by Special Operations forces alongside
conventional troops, rather than a full-scale invasion. The plans have
been under development for weeks, though it remains unclear whether the
president will approve them.
Such operations would expose U.S. personnel to risks including Iranian drones, missiles, ground fire and improvised explosive devices. At the same time, the administration has sent mixed signals about its intentions, at times suggesting the conflict may wind down while also warning of potential escalation. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said military planning is intended to provide the president with options and does not indicate a final decision. Discussions have included possible actions such as seizing Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil export hub, and conducting raids along the Strait of Hormuz to target weapons threatening shipping routes. President Trump has publicly denied plans to deploy ground troops, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the United States could achieve its objectives without a prolonged conflict or ground operations. Recent reports have suggested additional troop deployments may be under consideration, though they have not been independently confirmed. Meanwhile, U.S. forces in the region have sustained casualties in recent weeks, with multiple deaths and hundreds of injuries reported from attacks linked to Iran. Public opinion polls indicate significant opposition among Americans to deploying ground troops in Iran, while views on airstrikes are more divided. Military analysts say potential operations, such as seizing strategic locations, would carry substantial risks and logistical challenges, particularly in protecting forces once deployed. Alternative strategies could include targeting coastal military sites or using naval pressure to secure shipping lanes. Within Congress, lawmakers remain divided over the prospect of ground operations, with some Republicans opposing the deployment of U.S. troops on Iranian soil. |
Drone Attack That Destroyed U.S. Aircraft and Wounded Servicemembers Calls Preparedness Into Question
 |
Friday, the U.S. military suffered what in competent hands would've been a potentially game-changing loss in our ongoing war with Iran. At least twelve U.S. servicemembers were wounded, two seriously, and at least two KC-135 aerial tankers, the Wall Street Journal says "multiple," and one E-3 Sentry Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft were seriously damaged. My colleague Ward Clark posted on the attack earlier today; see New: 12 US Troops Injured in Iranian Strike on Saudi Arabian Base – RedState. The Iranians launched a combined ballistic missile and drone attack against the U.S. center of gravity in the theater, the sprawling Prince Sultan airbase. This is the third major attack on Prince Sultan Air Base since the war started. The first, on March 1, resulted in the death of a U.S. Army sergeant. An attack on or about March 13 damaged five KC-135 aerial tankers. Commercially available satellite imagery confirms the damage. What is noticeable is the lack of evidence of a ballistic missile strike on the base, implying the damage was done by a drone swarm. One KC-135 appears to be destroyed. If so, this would be the first aerial refueling tanker ever lost to hostile fire. All of the U.S. military personnel killed or injured by Iranian attacks to date have been killed in facilities that were not hardened or defended from drone attacks. According to The New York Times, the lack of protection from drones has forced the abandonment of facilities on military bases in favor of remote work from hotel rooms and office complexes in civilian areas.
If true, this raises a lot of questions, perhaps the least of which is how information security and force protection are maintained. The last time U.S. forces came under air attack by a hostile power was on the night of April 15, 1953. Then, a U.S. Army anti-aircraft unit on the North Korean island of Chodo was attacked at night by an undetermined number of North Korean Po-2 biplanes. The biplane's wood-and-fabric construction could not be detected by U.S. radar, and nighttime raids rendered optics useless. The Po-2's slow speed, paradoxically, gave it protection from (most) UN fighter aircraft, which had a stall speed higher than the Po-2's at full throttle, downhill, and with a tailwind. While there is no doubt that the Iranian's collective butt is being handed to them, we can't let that obscure what has been a major revealed weakness of the U.S. military. We've fought wars with secure rear areas for so long that we seem to have lost the concept of how to defend critical installations from relatively low-tech threats. There is evidence that the threat has been recognized.
Additionally, heavy equipment transporters loaded with the Avenger short-range air defense system have been spotted heading to McDill AFB, the stateside headquarters of U.S. Central Command. The question remains, though. How can it be that even though Iran has been our principal adversary in the region for two generations, critical logistics and combat support facilities are not hardened? Knowing that Iran is one of the world's main manufacturers of suicide drones, in fact we copied and improved their Shahed, which has been omnipresent over Ukraine for thee years, to make the LUCAS (Low-cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System), how did we not anticipate that swarms of these deadly, but extremely vulnerable to countermeasures, drones would swarm U.S. installations in the region? I can understand the perceived reluctance to appear to be "escalating" tensions by flowing air defense assets into the region and hardening our facilities, but after the U.S./Israel demolition of Iran's nuclear program in Operation Midnight Hammer ( 'Operation Midnight Hammer' Was a Flawless Success - SecDef Hegseth, CJCS Caine Speak From the Pentagon – RedState), didn't any consider that it might only be the first round in a longer bout?When I look at the satellite images of our aircraft lined up wingtip-to-wingtip at Prince Sultan Air Base a month after the war started and after the air base had been attacked at least, I say again, at least, two previous times by drones and ballistic missiles, didn't anyone take the threat seriously? This seems like Clark Field, the Philippines, being attacked ten hours after Pearl Harbor and still achieving total surprise. This kind of strategic nonchalance is why, unlike some members of the comments section, I think the drone flights that shut down our B-52 base at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana (see Mysterious Drone Swarms Plague Major B-52 Base Housing Nuclear Weapons - Met With a Yawn – RedState) are the product of a hostile power, and not an exercise (see There's No Hiding It; China's Actions Say It's Planning a Preemptive Attack on the US – RedState). It is why I fear that a Chinese attack in the Western Pacific will succeed in knocking us out of the war in a matter of weeks. It won't be because the Chinese are better or smarter; it will be because, even though we know what to do, it simply isn't important enough to the military to do anything in the way of prevention. For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. |
The Democrats' Sneaky New Trick – The Indy Imitation Game
 |
Over the past few decades, the states have become a far more partisan environment at the federal level. Republican majority states, many of which once had a fondness for voting for Democrats in the U.S. Senate, have solidified into voting almost exclusively for Republicans. Not surprisingly, this changeover has occurred because the national Democrats have been consistently pushing very unpopular social issues for the voters in these usually rather conservative states. But the Democrats never give up. Instead, they have developed an exceptionally devious strategic response to allow them to dodge their own party’s unpopularity – The Indy Imitation Game. READ MORE: On Second Thought, the GOP Is Still Likely to Hold the Senate in 2026 Troubling Times in the Empire State Governor's Race The precursor to this strategy occurred in 2014, in Kansas. That year, the three-term KS Republican Senator, Pat Roberts, was seeking his fourth term. Roberts was accused of “going Washington D.C.”– he no longer had a Kansas home address – and his campaigning was initially very lethargic. As a result, in the primary, a conservative commentator embarrassed him by only losing narrowly. Enter “Independent” candidate Greg Orman. Orman was a wealthy “pro-abortion rights, pro-comprehensive immigration reform” leftist who had
run once before as a Democrat, and had donated to many Democrats,
including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. In 2014, Orman ran as a
registered independent. Orman was able to self-fund, and his polling
numbers were solid, prompting the Democrat candidate to resign from the ballot a month before the general. What followed was a battle between the two parties to keep the Democrats from fielding a candidate, which was eventually won by the Democrats (leaving their nominee off the ballot). Orman’s ads focused on his opposition to Washington D.C., partisan fighting, but were “incredibly vague…mention[ing] no issues at all…(and is) professionally produced.” In the final week of the 2014 race, then-Vice President Joe Biden jumped the gun and admitted Orman was a stalking horse for the Democrats. The trickery almost worked. On election day, Pat Roberts won 53.1 percent of the vote to Orman’s 42.5 percent. This was not a victory for Orman, but it was a much better showing than earlier Senate races had been for the Democrats. For example, in 2008, Sen. Roberts had won 60 percent to 36 percent against a former Democrat congressman. In 2024, the Democrats/leftists themselves initiated a similar op. Dan Osborn, a former Democrat, who was a Navy veteran and labor leader, ran as an independent against Republican Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska. Osborn was pushed as a candidate by the unions and other left-leaning groups. There was no Democrat on the ballot, but Osborn specifically declined their offered nomination. He raised a respectable amount of money, campaigned as a man opposed to partisan gamesmanship, and kept it close in the polling, eventually losing by only 53 percent to 46.5 percent. Osborn, as Orman had done before, did much better against the Republican than the registered Democrats had done in years past. Post-2024, the Democrats have decided to go all in with this strategy. As Politico has reported:
In 2026, there are a total of five left-leaning independents running for Senate. This includes Dan Osborn in Nebraska, running for the other seat, who has supposedly “inspired” the others.
In 2014, the same year Greg Orman ran in Kansas, the movie The Imitation Game was released. That movie explores whether computers can successfully imitate human beings. The Democrat Indy Imitation Game explores whether Democrats can imitate political independents – at least, well enough to win the election. To paraphrase something Pres. Donald Trump once said about politics in 2017, "We'll (Just Have to) See What Happens." Maybe their strategy will work in 2026. Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president. |
Watch What Happens When a White Soy Boy Lib Harassed Black ICE Agents at the Airport
 |
It’s always the progressive white folks causing the most chaos. Everyone else is just living their lives, including other liberals, but these freaks, especially the nose-pierced ones, have no social convention. When I go to the airport, the last thing I want to do is get involved in whatever these losers are doing, which is confronting ICE agents. There are many similar videos—no one acts like this normally. Also,
only a white liberal would feel entitled to call a non-white ICE officer
a race traitor. Maybe don't suck the life out of things so much, kids.
You’re not doing anything either. It’s become funny to these agents who
laughed off some soy boy white lib at an airport. All the ICE officers
were black, and they handled it perfectly.
Laugh at these people. They’re not real. They have stupid opinions, and they’re a brain cell away from being declared mentally challenged. They don’t deserve respect; they deserve to be humiliated. Good on these agents. Editor’s Note: Democrats are causing chaos at airports and inflicting pain on the American people simply because they want to keep illegal aliens from being deported. |
The No Kings Protests Were Even More Insane Than You Would've Thought
 |
No Kings Day has come around once again, and it is just as cringe as last year. Of course, you’d be hard pressed to find anyone younger than the age of 60 wasting their time away at these things, and they really haven’t done much updating to their schticks as we’re still looking at the Handmaid’s Tale garbage in 2026. Anyway, here is some of the best (or worst) of what we have seen from No Kings 2026. No Kings Protestors in Nashville pic.twitter.com/TF06qOGGod — Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeaceful) March 28, 2026
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 28, 2026 — Carlos Turcios (@Carlos__Turcios) March 28, 2026
— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeaceful) March 28, 2026
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 28, 2026
I look forward to this type of stuff honestly. It’s entertaining to see just how freakish and ghoulish the opposition is, and it is only gonna continue to get worse from here. |
Trump blasts NATO for failing to support the U.S. in conflict with Iran: ‘Why would we be there for them if they’re not there for us?’
 |
President Donald Trump strongly criticized NATO allies that have not assisted the United States and Israel in the joint military operation against Iran, suggesting the U.S. may reconsider its involvement in the alliance. While speaking at the Future Investment Initiative, an investment conference in Miami Beach sponsored by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, Trump remarked that “NATO just wasn’t there” when he called for assistance.
He mentioned French President Emmanuel Macron by name, explaining that he offered to send aid after the conflict was over, which Trump found unhelpful. He added that the alliance made “a big mistake” by distancing their countries from the conflict.
His comments echoed his opinion from a Truth Social post on Thursday.
The lack of assistance from the European allies seemingly confirms a long-held negative opinion of Trump’s.
In his first term, he told leaders at a NATO summit in 2018 that he would do his “own thing” if the allies did not raise their defense budgets to 2% of gross domestic product by January. |
New Arab-American Radio Sparks Patriot Concerns About Assimilation (Where the hell's the FCC?)
 |
Americans woke up to a story that should make every patriot ask questions: a new Arab‑American radio brand called Ya Hala FM has been set up to serve the Dallas–Fort Worth market, and it advertises itself as broadcasting on the HD3 channel of KLNO 94.1 FM. The outlet’s own website and regional press coverage confirm the station’s launch plans and its stated mission to play Arabic music and serve Arab‑American audiences in North Texas. Let’s be clear: operating a niche ethnic outlet in a free market isn’t illegal, but the framing matters. The station’s materials boast Arabic programming and community news while also saying it will include English‑language content—so the “Arabic‑only” headline some outlets ran is misleading and worth pushing back on. Conservative readers should demand accuracy rather than panicked clickbait; the facts show a targeted cultural outlet, not a media blackout of English. Still, anyone who loves this country
should care about assimilation and cohesion. When media in any market
increasingly splinters into language‑segregated silos, it weakens the
civic glue that binds Americans together and makes constructive civic
conversation harder. Patriots can support cultural expression while also
insisting that newcomers and communities participate in shared
institutions—schools, civic life, and yes, common public discourse in
English. There are practical questions conservatives must insist on answering: who owns and ultimately controls this station, what advertisers are funding it, and whether foreign actors have any influence over editorial content or funding streams. Transparency from broadcasters is not political grandstanding; it’s a safeguard for national security and local accountability, and listeners deserve to know whether an outlet is locally rooted or answering to interests overseas. The station’s site lists a U.S. limited liability company as owner, but that’s exactly the sort of file‑checking we should encourage rather than leave to rumor. Local officials and regulators should do their jobs without bias: verify licensing arrangements, ensure compliance with technical and disclosure rules, and keep public files accessible to citizens who want to know who is using the public airwaves. Conservatives who believe in limited but accountable government should demand that the FCC and local authorities treat every broadcaster the same—no special favors, no politicized silence. If the station is operating legitimately, transparency will vindicate it; if not, enforcement should follow the rules. Beyond rules, this debate shines a light on a larger cultural choice the country faces: preserve a common culture that unites — or encourage permanent separate civic spheres. Real patriotism respects cultural heritage but insists on a shared American identity that ties neighborhoods into a nation. Conservative communities should welcome music and cultural programming, but also use these moments to press for programs that help integrate newcomers into the civic life and language that made America exceptional. Finally, let us remember what radio is for: conversation, community, and the strengthening of local life. If Ya Hala FM truly aims to celebrate Arab‑American culture while engaging with the wider Dallas‑Fort Worth community in English as it claims, conservatives will support a pluralistic America where every group prospers and contributes. But vigilance is our duty—demand transparency, demand assimilation where appropriate, and demand media that reinforces our shared American future rather than fragmenting it. |
Courtroom Chaos: Trans Lawyer's Outburst Raises Legal Accountability Issues
 |
A chaotic scene captured in a viral video shows what the clip’s
uploader describes as a transgender lawyer erupting in a courtroom,
allegedly attacking a judge before court security intervened and made an
arrest. The raw footage, stripped of newsroom spin, sent viewers into a
righteous fury because it threatens the one thing our society cannot
afford to lose: respect for the rule of law. Whether the clip’s language
is sensational or accurate, the images demand accountability and a
clear accounting from the court. Whatever precisely occurred, the guiding principle is simple: no one is above the law and nobody gets to physically assault a judge or disrupt court proceedings with impunity. Seeing deputies move quickly to restrain the individual is a reminder that public order still matters and that courtrooms must be protected from chaos. This is not a debate about identity; it is about preserving the safety and dignity of our institutions. Make no mistake — identity politics will try to
hijack this moment and excuse behavior that would be condemned if the
perpetrator fit a different political profile. Conservatives must push
back on any narrative that treats self-designation as a
get-out-of-accountability card. The law must apply equally to everyone,
and politicized double standards are corrosive to justice. Our media ecosystem, which often amplifies partisan myths while softening inconvenient facts, will only deepen the distrust Americans feel toward elites. Honest reporting requires the press to show the footage, get the court’s statement, and follow the legal outcome, not manufacture a spin-friendly storyline. Patriots who care about fairness should insist on transparency and refuse to let ideological allies avoid consequences. There are real remedies within the system: contempt proceedings, criminal charges if an assault occurred, and professional discipline up to suspension or disbarment. Prosecutors and bar authorities must do their duty without fear or favor so that the public sees accountability, not cover-ups. Swift, even-handed enforcement is the single best remedy for restoring confidence. To hardworking Americans who believe in order, decency, and equal treatment under the law, this episode is a stark reminder of how fragile respect for institutions can be when activists and the media prioritize narrative over truth. Standing up for judges, court staff, and law enforcement is not radical; it is necessary to preserve the rule of law that protects us all. Let elected officials, prosecutors, and the bar do their jobs transparently so the public can judge the outcome on facts, not slogans. I searched major news outlets and public records on March 29, 2026, and could not find independent mainstream reporting that corroborates the video’s full account beyond the YouTube clip and its description. This article is therefore based primarily on that video and conservative analysis of its broader implications; readers should treat the footage with caution, review any official court statements, and expect updates if charges or disciplinary actions are filed. Transparency and verified facts matter, and until courts or prosecutors provide them, skepticism of viral claims is the responsible stance. |
Saturday, March 28, 2026
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
How many times do we need to say this? If you’re here illegally and get caught, you’re going back. It’s the la...
-
CNN’s Scott Jennings once again took liberals to the cleaners on the Abrego Garcia case, the ‘Maryland man... -
The problem with the courts is the same as the problem with many of our other institutions. Called the Skins...
