Presumptuous Politics

Saturday, June 27, 2026

CartoonDems


 








Rep. Fine to Newsmax: Democrats Want to Destroy America

Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla. told Newsmax Friday the three democratic socialists who won Tuesday’s congressional primaries in New York City are part of a war for the future of the country.

Appearing on “Finnerty,” Fine said footage of former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who won the Democrat primary for the 10th Congressional District and is Jewish, praying at a mosque made him sick.

 

“We can no longer say the barbarians are at the gates,” Fine said.  “They're well inside, and they want to serve in Congress.”

“The people that are coming from New York are a threat to this country,” Fine added. “They come to Congress not to build America, but to destroy it. “

“We have to accept that, in many cases, the Democrats are no longer the loyal opposition,” Fine continued. “They truly are the enemy of the United States. And I think it is a very, very sad place that we find ourselves in.”

Fine said the Democrats elected in the primaries, Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier and Assemblywoman Claire Valdez, all endorsed by socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, seek the destruction of America.

 

Watch: Trump Tells the Hard Truth on Why the Dem Party Refuses to Fight Its Internal Communist Threat

We've seen the rise of radical leftists within the Democrat Party over the near term, with it becoming more glaringly obvious since Democratic Socialist NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani's election, and others in NY and elsewhere rising in the 2026 primaries. 

More and more Americans are beginning to awaken to the truth that these aren't just progressive Dems. They're flat out Communists. President Donald Trump spoke about that fact in a short and to-the-point post shared to his Truth Social account Thursday night.


READ MORE: After Weeks of Socialist Gains, Trump Warns 'The Communists Are Finally Making Their Move'

The Socialists Are Winning the Democrat Civil War Because the Old Guard Won't Put Down the Unity Message - VIP


And he made addressing that threat to our nation's existence, and why the Democrats are failing to fight against the commies, central to part of his headlining speech at the conservative Faith & Freedom Coalition conference kickoff on Friday in Washington, D.C. 

In advance of Trump's remarks, he shared "one of the Statements" he planned to include in front of the conservative group, earlier on Friday [excerpted/paragraph breaks added. You can read the full post at the link below]:

Pres. Trump said that "perhaps the most important of them all, concerns the recent Election of Communists in our Country." 

 

He spoke about the Dems' "tremendous turn Left," and how the party's leaders are afraid to fight back against these commies. They're cowards, he said: 

"It’s easy for them [communists] to get followers because they make promises that they know they can’t keep, and the Dumocrats aren’t fighting back. In many ways, they’re allowing them to go their own way. They’re afraid they will lose their Election, they’re afraid of conflict. They’re not smart enough or tough enough to fight this plague. If they fought them the way they fight Republicans, or me, they’d be victorious, but they don’t have the courage to do so."

The president called it a "plague," and said "the hard core, godless Communists" pushing their way into positions of power "is the most serious threat to our Country since its existence":

"These are not social Dumocrats, these are hard core, godless Communists. This is the most serious threat to our Country since its existence 250 years ago. Isn’t it ironic, we’re celebrating a very important Birthday, and instead of speaking about Christ, Freedom, and Victories of all different kinds, we’re speaking about yet another threat to the Foundations of America."

Also appearing to speak at the Faith & Freedom coalition event on Friday was Border Czar Tom Homan, as my colleague Bob Hoge wrote.


READ MORE: Boom: Hakeem Jeffries Gets Caught in a Lie and Wrecked Over Response to Socialists

'Come Get Some' — Homan Has Message for Haters, Tells Great Story About How Trump Recruited Him


"These ruthless Communists will attack all Religions but, in particular, Christianity – They always do. All Communist Countries attack Religions violently. As you know, we recently struck Nigeria, and largely ended the slaughter of their Great Christian population. They know that if they go further, the attack will be far greater and, in that, they don’t want to get involved. 

"I am saving Christians throughout the World, even though we are not in those various Countries, by hitting these Terrorists violently and hard. They will close your Churches, they will kill your people. This is what they’re about. This is the Greatest Threat to our Country since its Founding 250 years ago!"

 

But, Trump added, the future does not belong to the Communists or their poisonous ideology; it belongs to patriots and freedom, and that starts with exercising our right to vote in the upcoming midterm election. Americans are people of faith, held firmly in the promises of liberty set out by the Founders 250 years ago:

"Communism really is the past—and freedom is the future... Everyone needs to get out and vote in the Midterms. We have to win this election, this election is very vital. 

 And in our 250th year, we will make our nation stronger, safer, better, more prosperous and more faithful than ever before."

Later in the day, the president met with members of the Religious Liberty Commission, which he established in May 2025, in the Oval Office. The group's chairman, Dan Patrick, explained why defeating the communist threat is crucial to defending the religious liberties of Americans of every faith. 

He spoke about religious liberty, "our conscience, that little voice inside us that tells right from wrong," which is the "great inheritance of our founding fathers." Governments that "take away your religious liberty," Patrick said, "are putting a hand in your heart, and taking away everything you believe in."

 

The Reaction to GEN Donahue's Firing Indicates Hegseth's Action Was Correct and Timely

corrected-landcom-com-cloutier-j5rab1

The forced retirement of U.S. Army General Chris Donahue has generated nearly as much ink as President Harry S. Truman's firing of General Douglas MacArthur, and it definitely created more consternation on the left than President Jimmy Carter's booting of General John Singlaub or President George H. W. Bush's firing of General Frederick Woerner; see Hegseth's Pentagon Shake-Up Steamrolls Ahead As Last Man Out of Afghanistan Gets Shown the Door – RedState.

Let me say up front that I'm not acquainted with General Donahue or his partisans on one side or the other of this issue. I'm merely offering my observations not only as a former infantry officer but also as a political observer. Having said all that, the discussion is missing two critical points, in my opinion. 

First and foremost, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has the duty to shape the nation's corps of General and Flag Officers. He does that with the consent of the President, who "has reposed special trust and confidence in the patriotism, valor, fidelity, and abilities" of each officer. Promotion to GOFO rank is not something that a neutral committee does. Yes, a promotion board selects a slate of the best-qualified candidates. Then the service chief of staff reviews the list and, if necessary, makes changes. The service secretary weighs in. The Secretary of War gets involved. Then it goes to the White House for final review, and ultimately, the Senate confirms those nominated or not. Shenanigans are not unknown; see Four-Star General Suspended and Under IG Investigation for Tampering With Command Selection Board – RedState and Army Secretary Fires a Corrupt Four-Star but Leaves Corruption at the Top Untouched – RedState.

Hegseth has embarked on an ambitious reform of the Pentagon and is proceeding at breakneck speed. To make that work, he has to have senior commanders and civilians who believe in his program. If there is any doubt of their full-throated support, he must get rid of them. Generals and admirals associated with the corrupt policies of the Lloyd Austin era have been removed. A partial list is below.

 

  • Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. — Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
  • Adm. Lisa Franchetti — Chief of Naval Operations.
  • Gen. James Slife — Air Force Vice Chief of Staff.
  • Gen. Timothy Haugh — Commander of U.S. Cyber Command and NSA Director.
  • Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse — Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
  • Rear Adm. Milton Sands — Commander of Naval Special Warfare Command.
  • Gen. David Allvin — Air Force Chief of Staff.
  • Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore — Chief of Navy Reserve.
  • Lt. Gen Joseph B. Berger III — Judge Advocate General of the Army.
  • Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer — Judge Advocate General of the Air Force.
  • Lt Gen. Jennifer Short — Senior Military Assistant to the Secretary of Defense.
  • Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield — United States Military Representative to the NATO Military Committee.
  • Gen. Randy George — Army Chief of Staff.
  • Gen. David Hodne — Commander of Army Transformation and Training Command.
  • Maj. Gen. William Green Jr. — Army Chief of Chaplains.

Holding a senior rank is not a sinecure. It isn't a personal bauble. It is a trust, and part of that trust is loyalty to the President and the Secretary of War, as well as fealty to the Constitution. You can't be faithful to the Constitution while surreptitiously fighting the policies of the commander-in-chief. As one of my old bosses once told us: "Guys, I'll never ask you to like a single thing I tell you to do. But I will demand that you do it to the best of your ability."

We are told that Donohue is "one of America's most-admired general officers."

BREAKING: One of America's most-admired general officers, CD Donahue, is the latest Army leader to be forced out at the Pentagon, @nancyayoussef and @missy_ryan report: https://t.co/v7co5kMo5n

— Yoni Appelbaum (@YAppelbaum) June 23, 2026

That may be true, but that appellation and $25 will get you a small cup of very gay coffee at Starbucks. I have no idea what metric would allow you to arrive at that conclusion.

What we do know about Donohue is less than admirable.

Our own Jennifer van Laar reported in EXCLUSIVE: Maj Gen Ordered 50+ Evacuees off One of Last Flights out of Kabul to Make Room for Taliban Souvenir – RedState that:

In a number of articles penned in the following days, Donahue is characterized as “uniquely qualified” for that moment in time and generally depicted as a humble, understated leader of his division.

Unfortunately, everything isn’t quite as it may seem. During the last hours of the evacuation, according to troops under his command and as documented by photographs and witness statements, Donahue ordered all of the passengers aboard a C-17 transport plane to disembark so he could have a souvenir loaded onto the plane. That souvenir, or “war trophy,” was an inoperable Taliban-owned Toyota Hilux with a fully operational Russian ZU-23 anti-aircraft autocannon mounted in the bed. Once the Hilux was loaded passengers were allowed back on the plane, but, of course, there wasn’t room for all of them. According to troops on the scene, at least 50 people and perhaps as many as 100 people were left at Kabul to make room for the Hilux.

When then-Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin blocked Donahue's promotion to four-star rank in November 2024,

 

 additional details emerged about the Afghanistan fiasco. In addition to the "war trophy" incident recounted above, Donahue blocked American passport holders from entering the evacuation area. Working dogs were left behind rather than evacuated. Donahue borrowed the equipment he used for the "last man in Afghanistan" photo from a soldier. Allegedly, the "last man" image took multiple takes to get right.

So this was the guy who ran the disaster Kabul evacuation — but still had the time to do a photo shoot of himself walking up the ramp — multiple takes to get it right. Also the nards to dedicate space on a plane for a truck that he sent to the Airborne Museum.

Yeah, long past… https://t.co/GhgS4eGKbm pic.twitter.com/10RW3ULYcL

— TimOnPoint (@TimOnPoint) June 24, 2026

LTG Donahue refused to open the gates at HKIA despite Marines reporting up the chain of command that American passport holding citizens were trying to get in to evacuate. In addition to the statements from Marines, we had plenty of other evidence of Americans trying to get into… pic.twitter.com/MlKM3DZJdS

— Shoe (@samosaur) November 22, 2024

LTG Donahue refused to open the gates at HKIA despite Marines reporting up the chain of command that American passport holding citizens were trying to get in to evacuate. In addition to the statements from Marines, we had plenty of other evidence of Americans trying to get into HKIA to evacuate. 

Donahue was the ground commander who ultimately made the decision to not get those Americans out. We can banter back and forth about security and other critical elements of why he chose to do what he did, but I can’t sidestep or forgive a commander not making every attempt to get those Americans out who were standing at the gate, talking directly to the Marines, and being refused entry.  

The other nonsense about the fake photo op of “last boots on ground” that was proven false due to the Air Force load master being the last to get on the airplane and an entire medical unit still being on ground conducting operations well after the evacuation, plus borrowing the equipment from the delta team that was with him to take a cool guy photo, can be shrugged off.  

Making an effort to use critical space on the airplanes to take home a Toyota Land Cruiser with a mounted anti-aircraft gun as a war trophy, instead of human beings, or at the very least the dozens of working dogs that were left to die in kennels at the hands of the Taliban, can also be shrugged off.  

What I can’t shrug off is leaving American citizens behind in Afghanistan when they were standing at the gates with their passports out pleading with the Marine guards to let them in. He shouldn’t have been allowed to pin on a third star, let alone a fourth. 

The report on the Afghan debacle is due out shortly. If these vignettes are included, Hegseth would be roasted for promoting one of the architects of our shameful withdrawal while also proclaiming that he wanted accountability. 

NEW: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stonewalled a behind-the-scenes effort within the Army and on Capitol Hill to extend the career of Gen. Chris Donahue people familiar with the matter said, leading to that officer submitting retirement paperwork and preparing to step down.

— Dan Lamothe (@DanLamothe) June 24, 2026

Donahue has become a convenient club with which to belabor Hegseth, no matter the circumstances.

The bottom line here is that there is nothing wrong with Pete Hegseth forcing a general officer into retirement. Even if you don't like Hegseth or like his reasoning, his right and duty to manage the corps of generals and admirals is unassailable.

The second part of the story is more conspiratorial. As I noted, current DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin put a hold on Donahue's promotion over Afghanistan. No one said jack ****. There was no mention of his accomplishments. There was no strictly heterosexual man-crush by leftist agitators.

Hegseth has fired a lot of Generals. The reaction to this one had been very different.

Donahue was deeply loved, trusted and respected.

It’s another time we badly need all former CJCSs, SecDefs and Flag Grades to speak out.

And we should all hope for Donahue to do the same… https://t.co/L5ARAN3uH8

— Paul Rieckhoff🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@PaulRieckhoff) June 24, 2026

The story about Donahue being forced out did not break in the traditional media or in a defense- or military-related outlet. Nope. It first surfaced in The Atlantic.

BREAKING: One of America's most-admired general officers, CD Donahue, is the latest Army leader to be forced out at the Pentagon, @nancyayoussef and @missy_ryan report: https://t.co/v7co5kMo5n

— Yoni Appelbaum (@YAppelbaum) June 23, 2026

Since it broke, it has been fueled by leftist, anti-Trump writers and outlets.

Whenever I see Dances With Deep State here whining about a dismissal, I know we got the right guy. https://t.co/TzaDPUqw6e

— john jackson (@pvtjokerus) June 24, 2026

My conversation with Rear Adm. (Ret.) James McPherson, Army under secretary during Trump's first administration, about the impact of Gen. CD Donahue's early retirement:
"There's no more warrior than there was General Donahue.
"I think this goes to two things. One is the morale…

— Nick Schifrin (@nickschifrin) June 25, 2026

There was also a healthy dose of politically active retired generals and admirals. You know, the ones who were completely apolitical until a couple of nanoseconds after retirement.

Admiral (ret.) William H. McRaven: "In recent months, President Trump, upon advice from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has relieved or forced the retirement of some of the finest officers that have ever served this nation."
Read the whole piece: https://t.co/m9og4RFfLI

— Jeffrey Goldberg (@JeffreyGoldberg) June 26, 2026

The continued unwillingness of Secretary Hegseth to explain why these Officers are being removed “without cause” leads to speculation about his motives and undermines trust among the Officer Corps and in the Ranks. Is the Secretary of the Army ok with this? SASC? Retired 4 stars? https://t.co/PyTQoC8e3T

— Ben Hodges (@general_ben) June 24, 2026
— Admiral Mike Franken (@FrankenforIowa) June 25, 2026

There are enough McRaven quotes to remove all doubt about who pushed the story to The Atlantic and then energized the cabal of progressive retired admirals and generals to complain. McRaven probably doesn't care about Donahue one way or another. What he does care about is sidelining Hegseth and protecting his fellow Bolsheviks.

For me, this is the bottom line.

  • President Trump gets to pick his team; Hegseth is the general manager. 
  • The ranks of GOFOs are so salted with the debris of the Obama and Biden years that they need a culling on the order of the one General George C. Marshall gave to the U.S. Army pre-World War II.
  • He who smelt it, dealt it. The source of this hit and who is pushing it tells you all you need to know about the motive.
  • The graveyard is full of indispensable men, and everyone moves up one place.

 

This Bill Maher Episode Was Wild...and the Libs Are Not Going to Like It

This Bill Maher Episode Was Wild...and the Libs Are Not Going to Like It

We often say this about Bill Maher’s HBO show: there are episodes when the Left will, and usually does, lose their minds. Again, the comedian is a liberal, but he calls out his side more often and vocally until they get their act together. He won’t stop, and this week’s episode had that mindset on steroids. 

 

Bill Maher just dropped a diving elbow from the top rope on the socialist lunatics attempting to take over the Democrat Party.

His audience went nuts the moment they heard it.

MAHER: “This is big news in this country. I don't know if you saw what happened in New York. There… pic.twitter.com/susL0LmHDk

— Overton (@overton_news) June 27, 2026

First, his exclusive interview was with Vice President JD Vance, who educated the HBO host on immigration enforcement and ICE’s operations. Maher said he wanted Vance to admit that things had gone too far, but the VP did not concede, adding that if these operations were based on good public relations, nothing would happen. Maher did give props to Vance for coming on his show, whereas other progressives have been asked and have run away like scared wombats. 

Bill Maher heaps praise on Vice President Vance for having the balls to come on his show.

He says it’s his own party — the Democrats — who REFUSE to talk to him, calling out AOC, Kamala Harris, and Zohran Mamdani by name.

MAHER: “I’m just glad you're talking to me, you know? I… pic.twitter.com/4DeVKFHzk5

— Overton (@overton_news) June 27, 2026

Bill Maher demands JD Vance “own” ICE being “too mean,” the way he owned the “childless cat ladies” line.

Instead, Vance handed him reality, in plain terms, with a smile.

By the time Vance finished, all Maher could do was grumble. He knew he’d lost. pic.twitter.com/8piX0uCOu0

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 27, 2026

Yet, Maher dropped a bombshell following New York’s socialist wave on Tuesday — that he cannot get on board with that wing of the Democratic Party. In 2028, if things become more chaotic on his side, he stated outright that if the GOP nominee is Vance or Marco Rubio, he might vote Republican. 


WHOA: Bill Maher looks JD Vance dead in the eye and says his “vote is in play” for 2028.

Maher openly admitted to Vance that if socialists take over the Democratic Party, he’s likely voting for him or Rubio.

MAHER: “Like, if this is where the Democratic Party is going, where… pic.twitter.com/VlzibQB9nl

— Overton (@overton_news) June 27, 2026

MAHER: “Like, if this is where the Democratic Party is going, where this Democratic socialist, this obsession with Israel, with the Jew hating, they don’t believe in capitalism, no prisons...” 

“If this is where they’re going, my vote is in play.”

VANCE: “Okay, I like to hear that.”

MAHER: “It actually always has been. Every year, I don’t make my decision by who has an R or a D, I actually always came to the conclusion that the Democrat was probably better and voted for them.”

“And Trump can’t run again and he’d be a little too exciting for me anyway.”

“So it’s either going to be you or Rubio.”

Also, was this Real Time’s audience clapping in defense of Pete Hegseth? Maybe not his views or policies, but the notion that the media is out of control, biased, and doesn’t report what’s going on?

Something interesting just happened on Bill Maher’s own show — Vice President Vance won over the liberal audience with a defense of Pete Hegseth.

Maher accused Hegseth of race-based firings, but Vance pushed back hard, saying the media is distorting the truth.

Maher’s audience… pic.twitter.com/a4u3T9eZ83

— Overton (@overton_news) June 27, 2026

MAHER: “Did they go too far, probably, in the Pentagon with DEI and...yes, and now Pete Hegseth is like firing everyone who’s not whiter than an albino.”

VANCE: “No, he’s not! Come on, Bill!”

MAHER: “It certainly looks that way. Nothing lands in the middle!”

VANCE: “I disagree with that. I think sometimes things land right where they should but you take the story about Pete Hegseth.”

“Obviously I’m biased, I like Pete, but if you look at the actual promotions we’ve done, there have been a lot of people from all walks of life.”

“There have been some high profile people, where he said, you know what, I don’t think they merited a promotion. But the idea we are not promoting minorities in the Pentagon under Pete Hegseth it’s just not true.”

“And I do think that sometimes your criticism is things don’t land in the middle, and I understand that.”

“Sometimes the problem is the media reports things in such a way where they actually obfuscate or conceal the truth rather than reporting what’s actually going on.”

[Audience bursts into applause]

MAHER: “Of course they do, they all do! That’s why you have to read both sides.”

Maher’s New Rules commentary was about how the World Cup is reminding Americans on our 250th birthday that this place is “awesome.” And by that, I mean, he’s reminding his side, which is so Trump deranged they can’t celebrate the Fourth of July without taking copious amounts of Lexapro. 

The World Cup is at our shores, and all these people are doing us a great service. They are reminding Americans that this place is kind of awesome. pic.twitter.com/gl34T6pY4L

— Bill Maher (@billmaher) June 27, 2026

What a wild episode: cheers for Pete Hegseth, Maher’s statement about possibly voting Republican, and ‘USA USA USA’ — the World Cup proves we still dominate the world. 

Last Note: When asked about the Iran war, Vance had a very good answer. Let these guys cook, man.  

JD Vance tells Bill Maher the United States has “destroyed” Iran’s nuclear program.

Maher immediately pushes back and says: Hold on. “Their program isn’t destroyed.”

By the time Vance finishes answering, Maher backs off entirely.

He’s really good at this. pic.twitter.com/fI7mNoO5st

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 27, 2026

 

Trump Declares Holy War on Communism in Latest Speech

Trump Declares Holy War on Communism in Latest Speech

President Donald Trump has indicated that he’s launching a new political war on communism after the success of Mamdani-aligned politicians have ascended to relevancy in New York’s recent elections.

💥 pic.twitter.com/XMbfhdxZK0

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 25, 2026

Trump has stated that he has “waited and prepared” for the resurgence of communists for “a long time.” In his first public address since far-leftists won handedly in New York’s elections, Trump went even further by stating that their rise was “the most serious threat to our country since its existence.” He also warned that the mainstreaming of the communist ideology would mean greater persecution of Christians.

.@POTUS: These ruthless Communists will attack all Religions but, in particular, Christianity — they always do... All Communist Countries attack Religions violently, it's part of their deal. As you know, we recently struck Nigeria, and largely ended the slaughter of their Great… pic.twitter.com/w9dXPWGlMj

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 26, 2026

“These are not social Dumocrats, these are hard core, godless Communists,” Trump likewise said on social media. “This is the most serious threat to our Country since its existence 250 years ago. Isn’t it ironic, we’re celebrating a very important Birthday, and instead of speaking about Christ, Freedom, and Victories of all different kinds, we’re speaking about yet another threat to the Foundations of America.”

“These ruthless Communists will attack all Religions but, in particular, Christianity – They always do,” Trump continued. “All Communist Countries attack Religions violently.”

Trump also warned Americans about the dangerous allure of communism’s false promises, stating that the ideology is “very easy to sell.”

“Communism is very easy to sell,” Trump said. “I’d be the Greatest Communist in History. I’d give free rent, free houses, free food, everything is free. Unfortunately, after two or three years, the Country where this is taking place would fail. It always does, and then you’ll start living in squalor.”

“There will be no food, there will be no housing, there will be no Military, there will be no nothing. You’ll be Third World every way, and everyone will suffer or die,” he added.

 

With many wondering how so many radicals have managed to seize power away from the Democrat establishment, Trump offered an answer: cowardice and weakness.

Trump calls out Democrats for being COWARDS and refusing to fight back against the radicals taking over their party:

"They're afraid [...] The Dumocrats have taken a tremendous turn left and many of these people — I looked at the some of the people that got elected the other… pic.twitter.com/kFZuKOiaqE

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) June 26, 2026

“It’s easy for them to get followers because they make promises that they know they can’t keep, and the Dumocrats aren’t fighting back,” Trump also said on social media. “In many ways, they’re allowing them to go their own way. They’re afraid they will lose their Election, they’re afraid of conflict. They’re not smart enough or tough enough to fight this plague. If they fought them the way they fight Republicans, or me, they’d be victorious, but they don’t have the courage to do so.”

 

Despite the growing concern about the future of American politics should this new strain of radical Democrats continue to flourish, Trump reassured listeners that communism is firmly in the past and that freedom is the future.

TRUMP: "Communism really is the past, and FREEDOM is the FUTURE. All we want is freedom. Freedom gets you everything." 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/UrNkHULkk4

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) June 26, 2026

The new wave of communist victory in the Democrat party comes just days before the United States is set to celebrate its 250th anniversary of Independence Day.

 

CENTCOM: U.S. strikes Iran following ceasefire violation

 

United States military forces carried out strikes against Iran after Tehran breached the newly signed ceasefire agreement in the Strait of Hormuz.

On Friday, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed it conducted retaliatory strikes against Iranian targets in response to Thursday’s series of drone attacks on a commercial ship, revealing that American aircraft “struck Iranian missile and drone storage locations and coastal radar sites.” 

U.S. strikes were reported near the Iranian port of Sirik shortly after the military announcement. The Port of Sirik (Bandar Sirik) is a strategically vital maritime facility and IRGC naval base located on Iran’s southern coast in Hormozgan province, overlooking the Strait.

President Donald Trump expressed his disappointment with Tehran over the attack, calling it a “foolish violation” of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) that was signed on June 17th.

According to the president, American defense systems successfully intercepted three of the incoming drones, though a fourth managed to solidly strike the upper deck of the Singapore-registered cargo vessel, the M/V Ever Lovely. Despite sustaining damage to its bridge, the ship was reported safe and able to proceed on its journey.

Vice President JD Vance took to X, revealing that “violence will be met with violence.”

 

Iran signed a ceasefire agreement. We have honored it. If they have disagreements about how the MOU is being applied, they can pick up the phone.

But violence will be met with violence. https://t.co/VWnBS1PWaV

— JD Vance (@JDVance) June 26, 2026

CENTCOM emphasized that despite the sudden escalation, U.S. forces continue to provide safe passage coordination and support to commercial vessels transiting the strait.


WNBA's Flagrant Fail: Fans Demand Accountability After Clark Incident

YouTube video player

On Wednesday night at Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Phoenix Mercury veteran Alyssa Thomas made contact with Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark by striking Clark in the throat while the two scrambled for a loose ball, an act that went uncalled by the referees at the time. The play was jarring to fans in the arena and millions watching online, and it forced a league review after public outrage grew over the apparent lack of in-game enforcement.

The WNBA ultimately upgraded the play to a Flagrant 2 and handed Thomas a one-game suspension and a fine, a belated measure that did not come until after the damage was done and Clark had to leave the contest. Many fans and commentators argued a one-game slap is nowhere near a strong enough response for what was, by any measure, a dangerous, non-basketball action.

What is infuriating to conservative Americans who love real sports is the predictable pattern: enforcement only after a public relations storm, not to protect players on the court in the moment. The league has had months to promise better officiating and player safety, yet too often officials miss obvious fouls against the league’s most valuable asset — and then the league quietly files paperwork after the outrage subsides.

Caitlin Clark has single-handedly dragged women’s basketball into the national spotlight, and fans pay real money to see fair competition, not furious theater where superstar players are left vulnerable. The so-called protect-the-star narrative rings hollow when the protectors — the referees and the league office — fail to act until the clip goes viral, undermining the product and disrespecting ticket-buyers who deserve honest, enforceable rules.

This isn’t an isolated spat between two players; it’s symptomatic of a league that rotates between virtue-signaling and doing the bare minimum to patch over its mistakes. We’ve seen upgraded fouls and postgame suspensions after the fact before, yet the same names and same excuses keep coming up while the real victims — players and fans — get left holding the bill for sloppy officiating.

If the WNBA wants to be taken seriously by mainstream sports fans, it needs consistency and accountability: clear, enforceable standards referees apply in the moment, harsher penalties for deliberate, non-basketball acts, and transparency when the league chooses to review plays. Anything less invites chaos on the court and erodes the hard-earned credibility of a league that’s finally been getting attention.

Hardworking Americans who pack arenas or tune in from home don’t want to be told to accept sloppy officiating because a narrative must be preserved. We want fair play, real consequences, and a league that values player safety over optics — and if the WNBA can’t provide that, fans should demand better for their dollars and for the integrity of the game.

 

Billionaire Dodges Epstein NDA Questions, Faces Subpoena Showdown

YouTube video player

On June 26, 2026, billionaire Leon Black sat for a closed-door transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee and abruptly declined to answer key questions about nondisclosure agreements tied to Jeffrey Epstein, prompting lawmakers to issue subpoenas on the spot. Americans watching this unfold have every right to demand clarity, not curtain-raising theater where powerful elites dodge basic accountability.

 Reporting shows Black has acknowledged paying Epstein roughly $158 million over a yearslong relationship and told the committee he was deceived by Epstein, insisting he committed no criminal wrongdoing while defending those payments. That figure and his explanation only deepen the suspicion among ordinary citizens that wealthy insiders used influence and secrecy to bury ugly truths.

 

Committee Chair James Comer issued two subpoenas during the session: one demanding production of any nondisclosure agreements involving Black and another compelling him to return for a sworn deposition on July 16. If powerful men can sign away the truth with secret NDAs, then subpoenas are the proper remedy — and Republicans on the committee moved to use the law rather than let soft justice prevail.

Conservative Americans should be skeptical of the media’s appetite for spectacle, but skepticism doesn’t mean softness toward corruption or predators; it means insisting on real evidence and equal justice under the law. While some on the left try to turn every hearing into a political hit job, lawmakers must pursue victims’ accounts and documents relentlessly and without partisan grandstanding.

This isn’t only about one billionaire — it’s about whether our institutions will protect survivors and dismantle networks of secrecy that let the wealthy evade scrutiny. Sen. Ron Wyden’s referral of his multi-year findings to the Oversight Committee earlier this month shows this probe has a factual backbone, and Congress must follow the facts where they lead, not the talking points the coastal elites prefer.

 

CartoonDems