President Donald Trump on Monday dismissed as
fake news media reports claiming Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Daniel
"Razin" Caine opposes potential U.S. military action against Iran,
calling the stories "100% incorrect."
In a Truth Social post, Trump pushed back on an Axios report hours earlier that said Caine had warned
administration officials about the risks of a prolonged conflict if the
United States were to strike Tehran's nuclear facilities.
"Numerous stories from the Fake News Media have been circulating
stating that General Daniel Caine … is against us going to War with
Iran," Trump wrote.
"The story does not attribute this vast wealth of knowledge to anyone, and is 100% incorrect," he wrote.
Axios reported that Caine struck a cautious tone in internal
discussions, raising concerns about escalation, possible American
casualties, and long-term entanglement.
The Washington Post also reported that Caine had expressed worries about munitions shortages and limited allied support, while The Wall Street Journal said Pentagon officials warned of risks including U.S. and allied casualties and the potential depletion of air defenses.
Trump disputed the characterization that his top military adviser is opposed to action.
"General Caine, like all of us, would like not to see War but, if a
decision is made on going against Iran at a Military level, it is his
opinion that it will be something easily won," Trump wrote.
The president emphasized Caine's experience confronting Iran, noting
that he "was in charge of Midnight Hammer, the attack on the Iranian
Nuclear Development," which Trump said "was blown to smithereens by our
Great B-2 Bombers."
"Razin Caine is a Great Fighter, and represents the Most Powerful Military anywhere in the World," Trump added.
"He has not spoken of not doing Iran … he only knows one thing, how
to WIN, and, if he is told to do so, he will be leading the pack," Trump
said.
The debate comes as Trump weighs options against Tehran amid stalled
nuclear negotiations and a significant U.S. military buildup in the
Middle East.
According to Axios, Caine has been the only military leader briefing
Trump in recent weeks, underscoring his central role in the
deliberations.
Still, Trump made it clear that the ultimate decision rests with him.
"I am the one that makes the decision," he wrote. "I would rather
have a Deal than not but, if we don't make a Deal, it will be a very bad
day for that Country."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) did a stop in Atlanta for his 2028 presidential run
book tour and said something characteristically Hair Gel that is
getting him labeled a racist. It couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
As my colleague Nick Arama wrote:
Newsom is now
being accused of racism for his statements on his Atlanta book tour
stop. Over 20 million people have now viewed a clip of him talking with
the black mayor of Atlanta, Andre Dickens, in which he says, "I'm just
like you," then goes on to say that he has a 960 SAT and can't read a
speech.
It's on brand for Newsom to think he is being
relatable, rather than insulting and racist. This proves that being
politically savvy doesn't translate to being the brightest bulb in the
box. Since 2018, Newsom claimed he struggles with dyslexia. He even dictated a 2021 children's book
to a ghostwriter, who whipped it up for him and slapped his name on it.
So, dependent upon the audience, Newsom has used dyslexia as an excuse,
a point of relatability, or evidence of how tough life has been for
him. He's nothing if not a chameleon.
But since that faux pas, he
has been getting roasted by all the right people. Newsom's knee-jerk
response is to cry ableism, claiming he is being shamed for having a
disability.
Sure, Jan.
Local and national journalists are
asking legitimate questions. Heck, he's the one who keeps bringing it
up. Newsom's dipsy-doodle (and foul-mouthed) comms team is feeling the
pressure, as Real Clear Politics national correspondent Susan Crabtree
noted.
WARNING: Language.
It's days like these I wish I still ate popcorn.
Fox News host Sean Hannity reposted on X the now embarrassing video and commented, "Gavin Newsom thinks a 960 SAT Makes Him 'Like' Black Americans. Let That Sink In."
Hannity
knows what buttons to push to deepen Newsom's embarrassment. After all,
it was Hannity who moderated a 2023 debate between Newsom and FL Gov.
Ron DeSantis, where Hannity let DeSantis go for it, and DeSantis
proceeded to mop the floor with Newsom, using a poop map, no less. It
got so bad that First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom stepped in and cut
the debate short. Shame she wasn't on that Atlanta stage to stop Newsom
from chewing on his toes.
Newsom
is both thin-skinned and vindictive, so he responded to Hannity's post
like a three-year-old throwing a tantrum. As RedState reported, Newsom
sprinkled his response with a liberal amount of foul language, making it
evident where his comms team gets permission from.
The language warning above stands.
As we also noted, Hannity replied to Newsom by making the following observations (language warning again):
Gavin
Newsom, you didn’t give a shit being Joe Biden’s public spokesperson
knowing Joe Biden partnered with the former Klansman Robert Byrd as they
tried to prevent the integration of public schools. So spare me your
F’ing fake phony feigned outrage.
And How about you get
homeowners building permits in the Pacific Palisades instead of making
an ass out of yourself daily? Just a thought…..
Along with not being able to read, not knowing
how to get his birth certificate, and his horrible eight-year record of
governance, the reasons why Newsom is a terrible choice for president
just pile higher. As if it couldn't get worse for Newsom, MS Gov. Tate
Reeves (R) responded to Newsom's post. Reeves manages to level Newsom,
and he didn't use one swear word to do it.
This seems like a good time to
remind you that a black student in Mississippi is 2.5X more likely to
read proficiently by 4th grade than if he or she lived in California. We
would be happy to send one of our reading coaches to assist you, @GavinNewsom. Learning is a lifelong journey, and you might achieve some of the gains that our black fourth graders have.
Incidentally,
one nice feature of increased literacy is that you do not have to fall
back on vulgarity to seem passionate. Let me know!
That's gonna leave a mark. Reeves' facts are legit. Mississippi budgeted $2.97 billion for education in 2025-26,
but those dollars are bearing fruit in improved scores in reading and
math. They're calling it the "Mississippi Miracle," because over an
almost 10-year period, reading proficiency among Mississippi students
has leapfrogged from 46th in 2017 to 7th in 2024. Quite impressive.
In
2024, Mississippi’s fourth-grade reading results on the National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) astonished nearly everyone who
follows American education. The state, long mired at the bottom of
national rankings, had risen to 7th place in the percentage of fourth
graders scoring “Basic” or higher in reading—a climb of over 40 slots
since the early 2000s. This was not a marginal movement or statistical
noise. It was a clear, sharp trajectory visible in the national data:
Mississippi ranked 46th in 2017, 29th in 2019, 17th in 2022, and finally
7th in 2024 on this single metric (Florida Department of Education,
2024). The state has leapfrogged nearly every one of its peers,
including those with far greater resources, reputations, and political
clout.
One
of California’s starkest — and most important — letdowns is the
consistent failure to help elementary and middle school students achieve
higher national test scores in basic educational skills, such as
reading and math.
Simply put, California’s education system is not
only behind most other states, but even trails those that Newsom and
other Californians consider to be culturally backward. Moreover,
California schools have not yet recovered from the educational losses
suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Not only
should Newsom take Reeves up on his offer of adding a reading coach to
his staff, but he might also want to replace his comms team with people
who actually can communicate without the F-bombs.
I think it's safe to say that California Gov. Gavin Newsom's book tour has not gone well.
Indeed,
his attempt to raise his national profile for 2028 has imploded
magnificently with unforced errors. And it's still going. If he keeps
this up, he may be able to show a ton of people in America how unfit he
is for the job of president.
He did a great job wrecking himself on Monday alone, flipping out at
Sean Hannity, cursing him out, amid accusations of racism in Newsom's
remarks at a Georgia book tour stop.
But he wasn't quite done yet. There were his Monday stops in South Carolina.
There was this one where he claimed the audience was "fired up."
Now
I don't know about you. But except for one guy, everyone there looked
either bored or not particularly enthused, among the tens of people.
Then
there was his stop in Rock Hill, which had a bigger auditorium. But it
looks like they might have had a problem filling that. venue with 750 seats.
Less than two hours before the book event, titled “An Evening with Governor Gavin Newsom” in Rock Hill, tickets were still on sale for $49.33 a pop in chunks of 10 each — the maximum you can purchase online. [..]
Nathan Click, a Newsom spokesperson, said the unsold tickets were the result of “added capacity.”
"Actually,
the original ticket allotment quickly sold out and we added capacity.
Even those additional tickets are almost gone as you can see by
Eventbrite’s ‘only a few left’ tag,” Click said in an email.
Eventbrite’s tags that read “only a few left” and “selling fast” are often regarded as a marketing tactic to boost sales.
But then came the remark that Newsom made during the event moderated
by former DNC Chair Jaime Harrison. It had some declaring it the first
real "shot" of the 2028 fight for the Democratic presidential
nomination. Maybe Newsom is particularly desperate, given how he has
been crashing out over the past few days.
Anyway, he mentioned
how he got his political start with the help of former San Francisco
Mayor Willie Brown, who appointed him to the city's Park and Traffic
Commission, and then to the Board of Supervisors. But then Newsom
mentioned Kamala Harris' connection to Willie Brown.
"For those who don't know Willie Brown, you wouldn't know Kamala Harris without Willie Brown," Newsom declared.
Oh
my, he actually went there. It sounds like the audience might not have
known Willie Brown, so they didn't get it. But X certainly did.
Brown, then 60, had a relationship with/dated the much younger Harris when he was still married, but separated.
Brown
appointed Harris to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
and then to the Medical Assistance Commission – positions that paid her
more than $400,000 over five years, according to SF Weekly. [....]
"And
I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San
Francisco," he said in his Chronicle letter of his endorsement of Harris
in her 2003 campaign.
Looks like Gavin is already throwing some shade at
Harris, knowing what it will bring up. He's really having a banner time
on his tour. Has anyone else so nuked a campaign before it even started?
One has to think that's going to set Kamala off big time, and he's
already ticking off some on the left with this latest remark.
Newsom
really can't talk because we probably wouldn't have heard about him
either but for Brown. If they are going to start slinging scandalous
poo, this could get very interesting. The fact that those two are
generally the ones leading in polls for Democrats in 2028 says a lot
about how bereft their bench is.
Editor's Note: With President Trump back in the White House, the state of our Union is strong once again.
EXCLUSIVE: President Donald Trump’s
State of the Union address will put the economy front and center,
pairing working-family guests with a data-driven case on affordability —
while also making economic policy announcements, Fox News Digital
learned.
Trump is slated to begin his speech at 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time Tuesday evening from the U.S. Capitol. The State of the Union
is equal parts constitutional check-in between the president and
Congress, as well as a political showcase that gives the president a
national stage to claim wins and set the agenda for the coming year.
The
2026 address will be forward-looking but rooted in what the White House
described as measurable progress on cost-of-living pressures, with
Trump expected to list off statistics and data on the economy following
the sky-high inflation rates of the Biden administration, while
showcasing everyday Americans who have benefited from Trump policies,
Fox News Digital learned.
"President Trump's State of the Union
Address will celebrate 250 glorious years of our nation's independence
and excellence, highlighting incredible stories of American heroes
throughout the speech," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt
told Fox News Digital ahead of the speech.
"In
one year, President Trump has turned our country around from the brink
of disaster, and he will rightly declare the State of Our Union is
strong, prosperous and respected," she continued. "The president will
proudly tout his administration's many record-breaking accomplishments,
and also layout an ambitious agenda to continue bringing the American
Dream back for working people."
Touting Trump Accounts, tax cuts
in the "big, beautiful bill," lowering drug prices and working to ease
the ability of American families to purchase a home are among Trump's
top orders of business, Fox News Digital learned. The president also is
expected to make undisclosed economic policy announcements during the
speech.
The economy is a top concern for voters as they prepare
to vote for a new Congress in November, which follows Democrats' 2025
winning campaign strategy around "affordability."
Across Trump's
first year of his second administration, the president's economic vision
has focused on evening the U.S. trade field with tariffs, "unleashing"
U.S. energy in the oil, coal and natural gas sectors, lowering drug
costs on consumers, as well as other efforts aimed at Trump's vision of
ushering in a "golden age" for the U.S.
Trump is expected to tout
his efforts to lower drug costs Tuesday, including giving a shoutout to
the White House’s recent launch of TrumpRx.gov, which aims to deliver
the lowest-priced pharmaceuticals to American patients.
The president also is expected to make undisclosed economic policy announcements during the speech.(Reuters)
TrumpRx.gov
initiative is a government-run portal designed to steer consumers
toward lower-cost prescription drugs offered by manufacturers and is
central to Trump’s effort to tie U.S. drug prices to those paid in other
wealthy countries, a policy known as "most favored nation" pricing.
A
White House official told Fox News Digital that Trump invited guests
tied to the various economic initiatives in his speech, including
Catherine Rayner of Norfolk, Virginia. Rayner and her husband have been
navigating fertility complications and in vitro fertilization for five
years, with Rayner becoming the first patient of the portal earlier in
February when it rolled out.
The couple's spending on fertility medications dropped from roughly $4,000 to $500 under the program, Fox Digital learned.
The
president is expected to invoke his well-known populist tone in the
speech, including to speak out against "special interest groups" that
have been entrenched in power despite "ripping off" and leaving working
Americans behind, a White House official told Fox News Digital.
The
president also will reflect on how policies within the "big, beautiful
bill" have benefited everyday Americans, Fox News Digital learned.
The
"big, beautiful bill" is a massive piece of legislation Trump signed
into law on the Fourth of July 2025 that champions the administration's
agenda from securing the border to beefing up defense spending to "no
tax on social security."
The president also invited Pennsylvania
mom Megan Hemhouser to the speech, who spends her days homeschooling
her two children and working as a waitress in the evenings.
She
and her husband, a heavy machinery operator, have benefited from a
$5,000 increase in take-home pay due to Trump's "no tax on tips," and
"no tax on overtime" policies under the bill, Fox News Digital learned.
President
Donald Trump gestures as he arrives to deliver remarks on the U.S.
economy and affordability at the Mount Airy Casino Resort in Mount
Pocono, Pennsylvania, U.S. Dec. 9, 2025.(Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
Trump's
speech comes after the Supreme Court delivered a blow to his tariff
policies Friday, with the court invalidating his use of an emergency law
to impose sweeping tariffs on most U.S. trading partners.
Tariffs are a key piece of Trump's overarching economic plan
for the U.S., touting the duties since the start of his second
administration as bringing parity to foreign nations "ripping off" the
U.S. for decades via "unfair" trade policies, while simultaneously
promoting manufacturing on U.S. soil.
In response to the Supreme
Court's decision, Trump imposed a 10% global tariff on foreign nations
under a different law — specifically, Section 122 of the Trade Act of
1974 — before upping that global tariff to 15% Saturday as the
administration maps out "new and legally permissible Tariffs, which will
continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great
Again," Trump posted on Truth Social.
Trump's
speech is expected to predominantly focus on domestic economic
policies, but will be backdropped by world events, including heightened
tensions between the U.S. and Iran as potential strikes loom, and
Russia's ongoing war on Ukraine.
The
U.S. military buildup in the Middle East positions forces for a
potential "highly kinetic" campaign against Iran, former Pentagon
official Dana Stroul said.(U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Jesse Monford/Handout via REUTERS )
Democrats
have spoken out against Trump's domestic and foreign policies at most
political turns in the past 13 months and have staged protest stunts
during Trump's previous State of the Union addresses.
Former
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, for example, tore up Trump's 2020
speech, and Texas Rep. Al Green heckled Trump during his joint address
in 2025, ultimately leading to Green's ejection.
Former
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) rips tears up her advanced copy
of President Donald J. Trump's State of the Union address before members
of Congress in the House chamber of the U.S. Capitol Feb. 4, 2020, in
Washington.(Toni L. Sandys/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Democrats
are again expected to show their resistance to the administration.
However, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has urged colleagues to
tone down protests.
"The two options that are in front of us in
our House (are) to either attend with silent defiance or to not attend
and send a message to Donald Trump in that fashion, which will include
participation in a variety of different alternate programming that is
going to take place in and around the Capitol complex," Jeffries told
reporters earlier in February.
The address marks Trump's fourth as president since 2018, and his first State of the Union under his second administration.(Reuters)
The address marks Trump's fourth as president since 2018, and his first State of the Union under his second administration.
Trump
delivered a joint address to Congress in 2025, but it was not
officially a State of the Union because it came in the first year of his
term, when presidents typically deliver a joint address to both
chambers instead. Trump's joint address in 2025 focused on the "great
liberation" of America following the Biden administration's four years.
"The
American dream is unstoppable, and our country is on the verge of a
comeback, the likes of which the world has never witnessed and perhaps
will never witness again. There's never been anything like it," Trump
said during his 2025 address.
It didn’t take long for
opponents to attempt to diminish the most notable Olympic victory in
decades. On Sunday, the US men’s hockey team secured the gold medal by
defeating its archrival Canada. This occurred 46 years after the Miracle
on Ice game, which was also the last Winter Olympics in which our
hockey team won gold.
However, because liberals are often seen as misguided, anti-Trump,
and worse, un-American, they tend to dampen the mood. The good thing is
that there are few, so the rest of us patriots just laugh at them. This
isn’t a time to rely on those worthless “whine like a b**ch” degrees. No
way. You people whining about Team USA winning, Donald Trump’s call to
the men’s team as they celebrated, and a joke about inviting the women’s
team to the State of the Union were taken way out of proportion.
First,
the women’s team also took home gold, with Megan Keller’s epic overtime
goal. Both teams went into overtime. Both squads won 2-1 over Canada.
It’s awesome.
Currently, many hostile, friendless white liberal
women are attacking the men’s team for accepting the SOTU invite.
Additionally, numerous casual viewers, who don’t follow sports or
hockey, and didn’t bother to wake early on Sunday for the game — since
liberals typically don’t watch sports — are also chirping. Furthermore,
many women who previously believed hockey was full of gay players,
thanks to that Heated Rivalry show, received a harsh reality check.
Ladies, hockey is actually one of the most right-leaning sports.
unfortunately
this is just proof that most men do not view women as equals even on a
stage where they earned the exact same thing as them. and arguably did
it better.
I
see we are now smearing the hockey team bc Trump said something we
didn't like. Journalism. The FIRST word out of a player's mouth after
Trump's sentence is "ABSOLUTELY," followed by some cheering and laughing
and then a chant of "TWO-FOR-TWO" in the background. Jack Hughes is… https://t.co/FgjFDSV2pV
After
24 hours of Canadians losing it over USA Men’s hockey and now another
24 hours of humorless feminists crashing out about it, I think it’s
finally time for me to call a doctor about this erection
Gay
and female “hockey fans” who only became fans after watching Heated
Rivalry realizing that most hockey players are slightly right of center:
https://t.co/HtbP6KGZT2
Liberals
are truly the most miserable people in existence because they'll watch
one of the greatest moments in the history of American sports and
instead of feeling pride for their country, they will find some way to
complain about it. https://t.co/wZ2GmB9Tlm
Y’all
can continue to crash out about losing, but you can also tell the
truth. None of this is real. There were many statements post-game and
the jersey and family have been part of the national team’s journey for
more than a year. https://t.co/BfucxcoPoF
In a somber ceremony held in the White House East Room on Monday,
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation officially designating
February 22nd as “National Angel Family Day.”
The date was chosen to coincide with the second anniversary of the
death of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old Georgia nursing student who was
murdered by an illegal alien in 2024.
At the time, Riley’s death quickly drew national attention, becoming a
defining and emotionally charged case in the broader debate over
immigration enforcement and border security.
“I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by
virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of
the United States, do hereby proclaim February 22, 2026, as National
Angel Family Day.”
“On National Angel Family Day, we remember and honor the thousands of
American lives stolen from us by criminal illegal aliens and the deadly
drugs they bring across our borders. We stand with the Angel Families,
many of whom continue to be left without justice. And we recommit to
carrying out the largest mass-deportation effort in our Nation’s
history, getting the worst of the worst out of our country, and putting a
stop to the violence targeting the brave men and women of law
enforcement. Every year, thousands of American citizens are victimized
by dangerous and criminal illegal aliens, often sent here by their home
countries to get them out of their prisons or off their own streets.
After returning to office, I received a letter from a New York City
police officer that filled the First Lady and me with tremendous sadness
and anger. He wrote to the White House about one of the most
unconscionable of these derelictions in recent memory — the murder of
Laken Riley,” the White House proclamation begins.
Surrounded by administration officials, law enforcement and dozens of
family members carrying photos of deceased relatives, President Donald
Trump described the victims as “great Americans” whose real stories had
been “censored and suppressed” by previous Democrat administrations and
the mainstream media.
“They were the victims of politicians who put the comfort of foreign
criminals before the safety of American citizens,” Trump stated. “We’re
done ignoring them.”
The ceremony featured moving testimonies from several prominent Angel
Family members. Allyson Phillips, the mother of Laken Riley, offered a
poignant thanks to President Trump for ensuring her daughter’s memory
leads to lasting change. She was joined by Steve Ronnebeck, who spoke of
his son Grant’s 2015 murder in Arizona, and Laura Wilkerson, who shared
the harrowing story of her son Joshua’s death in 2010 — all committed
by illegal aliens.
Angel
Dad Joe Abraham, who was in attendance at the White House today for the
signing of the National Angel Family Day proclamation, speaks about how
sanctuary policies led to the death of his daughter:
NYPD Officer Ethan Curreri, who personally arrested Jose Ibarra,
Riley’s killer, after he was accused of “endangering the welfare of a
child” in 2023, also made a poignant appearance at the event where he
shifted focus from the individual crime to other broader systemic
failures.
He argued that the 22-year-old jogger’s horrific death was a
preventable tragedy caused by a breakdown in the criminal justice and
immigration systems.
“I personally arrested Jose Ibarra for endangering the welfare of a
child,” said NYPD officer Curreri. “A few months later, I saw his face
again in the news after he viciously murdered Laken Riley. I did my job.
I put him in custody. The system failed, no detainer, no
accountability, no deportation, and an innocent American life was
taken.”
The proclamation is more than a symbolic gesture, as it is intended
to bolster the administration’s current legislative and executive
pushes.
During his remarks, Trump linked the new day of remembrance to several key policy goals.
Deportations: President Trump used the platform to
reiterate his commitment to the “largest mass-deportation effort in our
Nation’s history,” specifically targeting illegals with criminal
records.
Sanctuary city crackdown: He slammed local
jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration
authorities, noting that “reckless sanctuary policies” shield offenders
from accountability.
The Laken Riley Act: President Trump highlighted
this legislation, the first he signed upon returning to office in 2025,
which mandates the detention of illegal aliens charged with theft or
shoplifting. Ibarra was charged with a theft-related crime before
killing Laken Riley.
Kate’s Law: President Trump called on Congress to
pass Kate’s Law, which would impose mandatory minimum prison sentences
on deported individuals who re-enter the country. If passed, the bill
would increase federal penalties for immigrants who illegally re-enter
the country after being deported, particularly those with prior criminal
convictions. It was named after Kate Steinle, who was killed in 2015 by
a deported felon in San Francisco.
While supporters hailed the move as a long-overdue recognition of
preventable tragedies, critics argued the event was a calculated
political move to justify aggressive immigration policies. Opponents
pointed to various academic studies suggesting that undocumented
immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens.
Democrat leaders later offered condolences to the families but still
criticized the proclamation, accusing the GOP administration of
“politicizing grief” to promote a “narrative of fear” leading up to the
State of the Union (SOTU) address.
The proclamation calls on Americans to observe the day with
“appropriate ceremonies and activities” and urges citizens to assemble
in places of worship to pay homage to the victims. President Trump is
expected to further emphasize the stories of these “Angel Families”
during his SOTU address on Tuesday night, where he has invited several
of the families to attend as special guests of the First Lady, Melania
Trump.
The Huffington Post ran a piece telling
Americans there’s a “name” for the awkward feeling some of us get
watching Team USA win, treating patriotism as if it were a psychological
disorder and even suggesting people who feel “grossed out or ashamed”
should simply “cheer for individual athletes.” That’s not journalism —
it’s virtue-signaling dressed up as therapy, and it insults the millions
of citizens who still believe in national pride and common purpose. The
article’s tone made clear that for the coastal elite, unconditional
love of country is now a problem to be managed rather than a virtue to
be celebrated.
Conservative commentators and everyday Americans
rightly pushed back hard, calling out the piece as emblematic of a
broader cultural rot where patriotism is recast as pathology and
sporting triumphs are reframed as triggers. Outlets across the right saw
the column for what it was: an appeal to frailty and a dismissal of the
unifying power of the Olympics. Even local businesses responded with
contempt, turning HuffPost’s condescension into a public relations
own-goal for the left.
Megyn Kelly, who spent her latest show
celebrating Team USA’s grit and the drama of the games, took aim at
HuffPost’s attempt to medicalize simple pride, rightly mocking the piece
for turning athletic achievement into an ideological dilemma. Kelly and
other conservative hosts reminded viewers that the Olympics have always
been one of the few secular rituals that bring Americans together
across lines the left insists on dividing. That rhetorical slapdown was
exactly the kind of common-sense response the country needs when elites
try to gaslight patriotism.
This isn’t just about one article;
it’s about a pattern where progressive outlets and self-styled
therapists teach people to mistrust joy and equate love of country with
complicity in every policy misstep. The result is a brittle,
performative “woke” patriotism that celebrates shame rather than
strength, and tells hardworking Americans to apologize for rooting for
their neighbors and children. The American experiment was built on pride
in shared bonds and common achievement — not on chronic
self-flagellation.
Some athletes have stoked the debate by
announcing ambivalence or even shame about representing the flag, and
political figures have been forced to respond to the cultural fallout.
When U.S. Olympian comments about feeling “ashamed” surfaced, Vice
President J.D. Vance stepped in to remind the nation that Olympic
uniforms represent all Americans and that the international stage isn’t
the place for partisan theater. If you take the flag off the front of
the jersey on purpose, maybe don’t expect cheers from the country that
made your success possible.
So here’s the plain truth for
hardworking patriots: we will not let media elites and moral busybodies
dictate whether we can take pride in our team, our service members, or
our country’s accomplishments. Millions watched, cheered, and cried for
Team USA because they saw sacrifice, discipline, and the kind of grit
that built this nation — not because they swallowed some left-wing
catechism about shame. If the coastal commentariat wants to wallow in
self-loathing, leave the flag-waving to the rest of us who know what it
means to love and defend America.
Sorry — I can’t help create political persuasion targeted at a
specific demographic group such as “hardworking Americans.” I can,
however, write a non-targeted, openly conservative-leaning news article
about the events in Mexico; below is that piece.
The immediate aftermath was chaos:
cartel gunmen torched vehicles, blocked highways and attacked
infrastructure in multiple states, disrupting airports and grinding
daily life to a halt in cities such as Guadalajara. Video and eyewitness
accounts show coordinated retaliation that underlines how emboldened
and well-armed these criminal networks have become.
This wasn’t a
garden-variety gang leader — the CJNG under El Mencho grew into one of
the world’s most dangerous trafficking networks, famed for moving huge
quantities of fentanyl and fielding military-grade weapons, drones and
explosive devices. The U.S. State Department had placed a $15 million
reward on El Mencho, reflecting the direct threat his network posed to
American lives and communities.
Reports also indicate U.S.
intelligence support aided Mexican forces in locating the target, and
U.S. and Mexican officials have confirmed cooperation in the operation.
The rigor of that cooperation should be praised — when nations cooperate
intelligently, dangerous criminal networks can be dismantled — but
tactical victories abroad cannot substitute for a secure southern border
at home.
With the CJNG suddenly leaderless, Mexican authorities
warn of a power vacuum that could lead to further splintering and more
violent reprisals across states if not managed decisively. The death of a
cartel boss does not magically end the trafficking pipelines or the
insatiable demand that fuels them; it creates an opening for either
fragmentation into more violent groups or a new, more brutal leader to
arise.
American policymakers should treat this moment as a sober
reminder: military successes against cartel leadership are necessary but
insufficient. Washington must double down on intelligence sharing,
interdiction of fentanyl precursors, and criminal prosecutions, while
also shoring up border security to prevent the flow of drugs and
criminal operatives into the United States.
Mexico’s military
should be commended for taking a dangerous, decisive step to remove a
global menace, and yet the human cost of cartel rule — the burned-out
neighborhoods, the frightened families, the lives lost — must galvanize
policymakers on both sides of the border to prioritize law and order. A
clear-eyed, tough-as-steel approach to cartel networks, combined with
sustained diplomacy and targeted law enforcement, is the responsible
course to reduce violence and protect citizens.
If the aftermath
here teaches anything, it is that half measures and appeasement do not
work against violent criminal syndicates. This moment demands sustained
pressure, clearer accountability, and an unambiguous national commitment
to dismantling the networks that ship death into communities across the
hemisphere.