Conservative Blogger
Tuesday, September 8, 2026
Canada's Retaliatory Tariffs Take Effect as US Trade Talks Stall
Canada's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods took effect just after midnight on Tuesday as Prime Minister Mark Carney increased economic pressure on his country's biggest trading partner after negotiations collapsed last month, intensifying an 18-month-old trade war. The counter-tariffs cover $20 billion of U.S. goods, with duties ranging from 15% to 50% across products from steel and furniture to clothing and electronics. The dollar-for-dollar retaliation marks an escalation in the dispute between the neighboring countries, and U.S. and Canadian officials have traded blame for scuttling a deal that seemed close to fruition two weeks ago. The rising tensions create uncertainty about the broader U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, which is up for annual reviews after President Donald Trump declined to extend it for another decade. "What we are worried about is an escalatory spiral," said Michael Harvey, executive director of the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance and a member of Carney's advisory committee on bilateral U.S. economic relations. "But at the same time, we totally understand that the prime minister needs to find areas of leverage," Harvey said. U.S. TARIFFS HIT CANADIAN WINE, FURNITURE, DAIRY Trump's tariffs implemented last month hit sectors including wine, furniture, dairy products, cement, clothing, fishing rods and hockey equipment, covering $20 billion, or 5%, of Canadian exports to the U.S. According to Canadian and U.S. government data, Canada has shipped almost 68% of total exports to the U.S. this year, out of which roughly 80% moved duty-free due to exemptions under the USMCA pact. Protections under the agreement have provided the domestic economy some resilience. The new tariffs, imposed under a Depression-era U.S. law, do not allow Ottawa to exercise USMCA exemptions. Concerns about the USMCA's future have fueled uncertainty about investment and growth, as Canada wages a trade war against an economy 13 times its size. Polls show Carney has broad support from Canadians, but it could disappear within months as the consequences of the trade war sink in, according to political analysts. Just 20% of Americans approved of Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found. Carney said last week his government was ready to sign a trade deal that benefits both countries. Trump threatened last month to raise U.S. tariffs on all cars, trucks and automotive parts from Canada to 50% starting Jan. 1, and signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario as Lake America. A government source said there are currently no talks between the two sides among ministers or government officials. "The Canadian government needs to keep channels open to the United States and not go overboard in terms of rhetoric and reacting to the rhetoric from the American side, while waiting for the American decision-making process to come back to economics," Harvey said. |
Democrats Officially Hit the Panic Button in New Hampshire Senate Race
 |
A couple of weeks ago, RedState reported on how the New Hampshire Senate race was becoming one to keep an eye on due to how the contest was shaping up as the race prepares to enter the general election campaign season. The primary is Tuesday, September 8th, and if the current polling bears out, we'll see former Sen. John E. Sununu (R) take on four-term Democrat Rep. Chris Pappas (NH-01) to determine who gets to fill the seat being vacated by Democrat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who opted not to run for reelection. Shaheen defeated Sununu, who served one term, in 2008. As we noted in our reporting, late August polling on a hypothetical matchup from the University of New Hampshire (UNH) and 7NEWS showed a tight race, "statistically tied," but with Sununu having a slight two-point edge, though within the margin of error. It was significant not just because it was the first poll taken in 2026 showing Sununu ahead in a general election match-up scenario, but also because the previous UNH poll from June had Pappas ahead of Sununu by three. Between that, a National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)-commissioned poll that also showed Sununu with a slight edge, and the fact that the Sununu name carries a lot of weight in New Hampshire politics (dad John H. and brother Chris both served as governor), Democrats have officially hit the panic button on this race, with the New York Times reporting that "a tide of anxiety has risen" among New Hampshire Dems in recent weeks:
The Times also quoted former New Hampshire Democrat Party chairwoman Kathy Sullivan, who noted that the Granite State is "not a blue state. It’s a purple state." It's a point that was echoed in so many words by Pappas himself in August:
Much like is being done with GOP Sen. Susan Collins in Maine, Democrats are going to do their best to use the guilt-by-association card on Sununu on the issue of President Trump, even though Sununu wasn't a senator during Trump's first term and even though Sununu, along with his dad and brother, backed Nikki Haley in the 2024 GOP presidential primary over Trump. But Trump, perhaps realizing the importance of holding the Senate amid the rise of "democratic socialism" within the Democrat Party, seems to have made peace with it, endorsing Sununu in February, much like he gave the thumbs up to Collins in her reelection bid despite her independent streak: Sununu has to get by former Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown, who has had a poor showing in polling, trailing Sununu by an average of 33 points. Pappas needs to get by newcomer and self-described "peace activist" Karishma Manzur, who socialists are rallying behind. She has trailed Pappas by big numbers in most polling, but the UNH poll indicated she had "significantly narrowed the gap" to 13 percent, while 18 percent remained undecided. She got this good zinger on him in the last debate: One final thing to keep in mind is that there could be a "spoiler" candidate in this contest who has the potential to hurt Sununu:
Day admits that his goal is to hurt Sununu's chances of winning, and credits himself with former Senator (now governor) Kelly Ayotte's 2016 loss to Hassan:
|
The 'Woke Language' Interim Seattle Police Chief Uses to Describe Shooters Is Not Going Over Well
 |
Like many Democrat-run cities across the country, Seattle is a hot mess when it comes to combating crime, with city "leaders" often demanding hands-off approaches to things like confronting street thugs, repeat offenders, violent wacktivists, and the like. Though this approach has been favored for some time now by the Democrats and socialists who hold all the power, Seattle's openly socialist mayor, Katie Wilson, took things to a whole new level once she took office, making stupid and dangerous decisions like these, for example:
Perhaps more infamous was Wilson's decision to force then-Seattle Police Chief Shon Barnes to resign just days after the city badly bungled the initial response to the mass shooting that occurred at the Bite of Seattle food festival in July, which killed three, including one of the alleged suspects, and injured four. Now in Barnes' place is Interim Police Chief Andre Sayles, who had a rather interesting way to describe shooters during a Labor Day press conference in response to a surge in violence on Seattle streets:
"Trigger pullers"? That didn't sit well with some Seattle residents, including journalist Jonathan Choe, who wrote on X, "Now Seattle leaders are trying to control the narrative by creating woke language. Incredible." The Post Millennial's (TPM) West Coast editor Ari Hoffman, also a Seattleite, was equally unamused:
Seattle-based TPM investigative journalist Katie Daviscourt remarked, "Quite the rebrand." I get that this term is sometimes used by law enforcement officers, but I don't think it's very common, in part because it's almost like it takes the focus away from the fact that someone actually shot the gun and puts more focus on the gun itself. Which, come to think of it, might be the point:
Sounds about right. |
Thomas Jefferson Warned Us About the Media
 |
We all know that the American “mainstream,” “corporate” media cannot be trusted. Well, they can be trusted to always Polly-parrot the Democratic Party’s talking points, thus they can be trusted to lie, be dishonest, corrupt, and always wrong. They are the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party, just as Joseph Goebbels’ media was the propaganda wing of the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. It is unfailingly the case that today’s media never supports the conservative, Christian, godly, pro-traditional American perspective. They are as evil as Democrats, because they are Democrats, and religiously so. Apparently, in American history, media bias has always been a problem. Thomas Jefferson wrote that, in his day: “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.” (Letter to John Norvell on June 11, 1807) Nothing the media says can be trusted. Even on the rare occasions when they tell the truth, Jefferson said, we can’t trust that they are speaking the truth because they lie so much that anything they say must be viewed with suspicion. The best approach, and the one most conservatives and patriotic Americans take, is just to assume that anything the media reports is wrong, or incomplete in its reporting (especially if the event has an element contrary to their left-wing narrative, like any murder not committed by a white, male, MAGA Christian). Jefferson also wrote: “I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them.” (Works of Thomas Jefferson) Best thing to do is not bother watching ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, et al., or reading The New York Times or any other liberal rag. Truth can be found, but you’ve got to dig a little to find it now. Townhall is a good source, of course, as is X. But to most Americans, I would simply advise not wasting time watching or reading any of the “corporate” media outlets. As Jefferson implies, you’ll be dumber if you do. Now we do need some good, courageous, well-grounded conservatives scouring the mainstream media sites to expose their errors. Many Townhall writers do this, and we appreciate them. But for most Americans, the mainstream media is nothing but a lying, dangerous nuisance. No sense in getting close to a cobra and slapping it in the face. The “newspapers” constituted the media of Jefferson’s day, and he clearly indicated that they could not be trusted, and he told us the reason why: “You know well that government always kept a kind of standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invented and put into the papers whatever might serve the [government] ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.” (Letter to Walter Jones, 1814) To Thomas Jefferson (and I agree with him whole-heartedly), it was a “power” issue. Governments and politicians crave power, and will distribute that power to its benefit whenever possible. The media, unless filled with scrupulously honest and virtuous people (never wholly the case), can, and will, be used by government for its purposes — just like schools, churches, and every other source of information can be so used. We want, and need, a free press, but a free press means a virtuous press, just as a free citizenship means virtuous citizens. Corruption and evil in the media and the people will always be a detriment to a nation and lead to its eventual downfall. When the press becomes decadent, and filled with disingenuous, power-seeking, egotistical mercenaries for the state, then we get a media that Jefferson complained about, and one that is as horribly corrupt and pretentious as our current media is. America’s present media, obviously, has, with few exceptions, fallen into line with the Democratic Party, but it could (theoretically) do that with the Republicans. Jefferson's point is that government is what ultimately cannot be trusted, for government will use the media (to the obvious benefit of both, as Hitler, Stalin, and the CCP did and do) if it can get away with it. As many of you know, I lived in Communist China for 10 years, and the media is run wholly by the state, and thus can never be believed in anything it says. Many in China, just like many in America, are duped into thinking that everything their government (or political party) says is true. It’s frustrating. And it’s not just on the Left. Trump God Syndrome is as dangerous as Trump Derangement Syndrome. “Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty [as well as] by the abuse of power.” (James Madison, The Federalist Papers) The Democrats today gain much benefit from their propaganda outlets in the “mainstream” media. These media people are also obviously benefitted, especially when Democrats gain control of government. But regardless of that, the point is that today, since most of the “mainstream” media are clearly left-wing Democrats who value the spreading of the Democratic Party program more than they do truth and honesty, they cannot, and must not, be trusted. Such lack of trust was true in Jefferson’s day, too, and he warned us about it. And, as usual, most Americans don’t know what he said, and probably wouldn’t understand him if they did. |
'Trump Power Plant' Coming to Fayette County, the Largest Investment in Its History
 |
UNIONTOWN, Pennsylvania — Scott Dunn did not get a call from Washington. Instead, he received calls from his constituents. The chairman of the Fayette County Board of Commissioners had watched the March announcement like everyone else: a $17 billion natural gas generation hub somewhere in southwestern Pennsylvania, with 4.3 gigawatts of capacity, financed through Japan's investment commitment under the U.S.-Japan trade agreement, with NextEra Energy Resources as developer. The federal government called it Project South Mon. It would not say where. Dunn did the arithmetic anyone from Dunbar would do. "It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out, OK, the Monongahela is only so big and south of Pittsburgh, and that could be us," he said. "Why couldn't it be us?" Then his phone rang. "I actually started hearing from property owners, and they were like, 'Hey, we're being contacted. What should I do?'" Dunn said. "So the first thing I said was, 'Get an attorney.'" Dunn had a name for the thing before anyone in Washington would put one on it. "I said, 'I call it the Trump Power Plant,'" Dunn said. "And they were like, 'OK.'" Then he asked the question that may have decided the whole thing. "'Do you want to sell your property? And is this life-changing money for you?' And they're like, 'Yeah, this is life-changing money.' So I said, 'Whatever deadline they put in front of you, meet that deadline, because they're going to go wherever they have the easiest path,'" he said. They met the deadlines. It is coming here. The project is the East Riverside Energy Center, and it will sit in Luzerne Township on the Fayette County bank of the Monongahela River. A NextEra development executive, speaking on background, laid out the plan in detail: The company holds purchase options on roughly 700 contiguous acres along the river. About 150 of those acres would carry the plant itself: three combined-cycle power blocks, each in a two-on-one configuration — two gas turbines feeding a single steam turbine — at roughly 1,250 megawatts apiece. Commercial operation is targeted phase-by-phase in 2030, 2031 and 2032, with all of it interconnected to the PJM Interconnection regional grid. Of the $17 billion allocated to Pennsylvania, the executive said, $13 billion is for East Riverside. The company projects roughly 2,000 construction jobs and about 100 permanent positions. NextEra's argument is that nobody's built more natural gas power plants over the last 20 years than it has, and that expertise is why it was elected in March on behalf of the federal government as a developer for the natural gas generation project. For Dunn, the figure is the story. "This is absolutely the most significant investment in the county — and that's not to disrespect anybody who's made investments and started businesses in the county," he said. "I mean, this scale. This is beyond anything that we kind of comprehend could be here." Dunn said the company made clear that Fayette was just one option among several. "They were saying, 'Hey, we're considering multiple sites, and this could be here, this could be there. It could be in different counties. They could pick a different site and have three sites instead of just one site,'" he said. "And so basically I said, 'What does it take to get all of that here?'" He pitched what a rural county has to pitch: opportunity zones, enterprise zones, the state programs on the shelf, and all while conceding that they were probably beside the point. "Those are through the state, and those programs, quite frankly, might not be big enough to even matter in a project this size," he said. "But I put the push on, and can't believe that it works somehow." What Fayette actually had was land that nobody else wanted. "This is old coal property, an old coal mine property that doesn't have a reuse available to it. You can't grow anything on these properties," Dunn said. "So if you're going to build something like this, what a better place than reusing a property that otherwise has no use, and you're so far away from neighbors that you're not going to bother anybody." NextEra confirmed the parcels within the footprint were surface-mined for coal and have since been reclaimed, with other active and yet-to-be-reclaimed mines nearby along the river. The record is more specific than either man volunteered. Downriver at Labelle, J&L Steel built a coal preparation plant in 1950 to wash the output of the Vesta mines across the water in Washington County, running a conveyor over the Mon to feed it. Vesta No. 4 and No. 5 were mined out by the 1970s. The plant limped on under later owners; the state took a half-interest in the processing company in the mid-1990s, and the site's final industrial use was as a place to dump fly ash to stabilize a mountain of refuse. Eighty years ago, this bend in the river was the center of the coke economy. The Connellsville seam held some of the best coking coal on Earth. By the 1880s, Fayette County produced nearly half the coke in the country, and in the 1920s, Uniontown was said to have more millionaires per capita than any other city in America. Luzerne Township has about 5,000 people today — half what it held at the peak. Dunn said he pressed on the two questions that a county has to press. Power draw was the easy one. "This will actually add to the grid, or capacity to the grid," he said, adding, as for water, "They'll apply for a draw out of the Monongahela, and they had mentioned how they process some of the water. Some of the water is treated and returned to the Mon, but the actual way that happens is more of a question for them than for me." His confidence rests on a precedent sitting up the same shoreline. Duke Energy broke ground on the Fayette Energy Facility in Masontown in 2002, a $400 million investment, and the 620-megawatt combined-cycle plant went commercial in May 2003 on a 300-acre riverfront site. "Fayette County already has a power plant," Dunn said. "It's not on this scale, but it is along the Monongahela River. We don't get any complaints about that. We don't get a noise complaint or air quality or anything like that. So we're not unfamiliar with a gas-powered power plant." He is not expecting a quiet reception. Asked whether he anticipates opposition, he did not hesitate: "Yeah. And that's part of it. So we're kind of planning on that." The eventual owner of the site will be a special-purpose vehicle standing in for the United States and Japanese governments. NextEra was elected as developer and will be the eventual operator of the generation footprint. "That special purpose vehicle will be a taxpaying entity," the executive said — the sentence Luzerne Township and the Brownsville Area School District will care about most. On August 12, NextEra announced that it had executed definitive agreements with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the government of Japan, releasing the first tranche of funding for the Pennsylvania and Texas projects. The money is earmarked for down payments on long-lead equipment — turbines above all — and for selecting engineering and construction contractors. Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA) put it in the register that the valley understands: "The Mon Valley region built the steel that built America. Now it's going to build the power that fuels America's future." In March, nobody would say that much. Neither the White House nor the company would provide a location or a construction date. The project is an opportunity for the Marcellus Shale to produce natural gas that is then consumed by a power plant in Pennsylvania, specifically in Fayette County, to produce electricity that ultimately ends up on the grid in the Keystone State. Supply agreements are still being negotiated, as are contracts with engineering and procurement firms. Pipeline expansion would add work beyond the fence line. A larger economic impact study is promised later. The timing is not incidental. PJM's July capacity auction for the 2028-29 delivery year fell 6.8 gigawatts short of its reliability requirement, with prices at the cap, and the grid operator has warned that starting in June 2027 the region will miss required reserves. Fayette County is, by any honest measure, one of the most beautiful places in Pennsylvania. The National Park Service keeps three places here, and all three are about beginnings. At Fort Necessity, a 22-year-old Virginian named George Washington surrendered on the Fourth of July, 1754, and set a world war in motion. At Jumonville Glen, 7 miles off, the shot that started it was fired weeks earlier, with him in the thick of it. And above the Monongahela at Point Marion stands Friendship Hill, the home Albert Gallatin built before he became the longest-serving treasury secretary in American history and financed the Louisiana Purchase and the expedition that mapped what lay beyond it. It is also one of the poorest counties. Its poverty rate stands near 16.8 percent, well above the rest of the state, and its population has fallen by nearly 10 percent since 2010. Dunn has been a commissioner since late 2019, and he has spent much of that time saying one thing to anyone who would listen. He said it again, and it was the closest he came to sounding vindicated. "We have been telling people for three or four years: Fayette County can fuel the next revolution, which is data centers, and we can add power to the grid," he said. "We've been saying this for three or four years. And for it to finally come true is very exciting for us." There will be an end user for a share of the power. There isn't one yet. The trade deal signed in 2025 leaves that call to a U.S. investment committee chaired by the commerce secretary. This is subject to Japan's approval and funding, and puts the cost of building the plant on Japanese capital repaid through the offtake, not on local ratepayers. And whoever the buyer turns out to be — a data center, an industrial project, or something else — they will not be built here on the site. |
‘The grief makes Charlie feel impossibly close’: Erika Kirk opens up about grief journey almost 1 year after Charlie’s assassination
 |
| Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, speaks at the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025. Turning Point USA (TPUSA) CEO and Charlie Kirk’s widow Erika Kirk opened up about her grief journey as the one-year anniversary of her husband’s death approaches. In a Monday guest essay featured in the New York Times, Erika shared the often inconsistent nature of grief, noting that within the immense sadness, moments of joy still exist. It has been almost one year since Charlie Kirk, the founder of TPUSA, was assassinated during an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on September 10, 2025. As his alleged killer, Tyler Robinson, is set to go to trial, Erika offered her perspective on grief in a 1,000-word essay.
She shared the hardship of going through special occasions without Charlie, including their two children’s birthdays.
Despite the loss and the hard times for her family, Erika explained that good can come out of any circumstance, and that true faith is accepting that an answer will not always be provided.
As the one-year anniversary of Charlie’s death looms closer, Erika noted that grief has taken on a different form for her.
Though grief is poignant, she described its dual nature, noting that even in the midst of sadness, there are moments of beauty.
|
U.S. Escorts Restore Strait of Hormuz Oil Near Pre‑War Levels
The latest claim from the administration is simple and bold: oil is flowing through the Strait of Hormuz again at nearly the levels we saw before the fight with Iran. If true, that is a big win for American power, global markets and for anyone tired of living at the mercy of a hostile regime that likes to play giant game of “hold the world hostage.”
Record convoy: Hormuz flows near pre‑war levels
President Donald Trump and Energy Secretary Chris Wright have publicly said U.S. forces helped escort a massive movement of oil through the strait. The administration put the figure at roughly 17–18 million barrels moving by ship in a single day and described a U.S. military operation that escorted about 40 commercial vessels carrying that crude through a guarded corridor. That number is near the roughly 20 million barrels per day the region handled before the conflict, and the White House is rightly touting it as proof the Gulf no longer controls global energy markets.
Why this matters for oil markets and national power
When the Strait of Hormuz is closed or choked, gasoline prices and economic pain spike worldwide. Getting shipments back toward pre‑war levels means lower risk of sudden price shocks and fewer headlines about “energy shortages.” But this is also about deterrence. If Washington can move tankers safely, the idea that Iran can strangle trade with a few missiles and drones looks weaker. Call it the military equivalent of turning the lights back on — only with more jets, ships and common sense.
How the U.S. kept the oil moving
Escorts, corridors and hard choices
Officials say the operation involved an escorted shipping corridor near the Omani coast, supported by air, sea and space assets. Convoys are often scheduled at night, ships sometimes go “dark” by turning off transponders, and some cargoes use ship‑to‑ship transfers to get product through safely. That takes manpower, planning and the willingness to push back on threats — something the administration has done. It also required targeted strikes on Iranian maritime capabilities after attacks on commercial vessels, a blunt reminder that freedom of the seas is defended, not begged for.
Reality check and what to watch next
Before anyone breaks out the confetti, independent trackers and industry analysts caution that government tallies and open data don’t always line up right away. A single high‑volume day is encouraging, but sustained recovery needs to be proven with port receipts, manifest reconciliation and longer trends. And the risk is not over: attacks are still being reported, and any renewed wave of strikes could push flows back down unless escorts grow and allies carry more of the load. For now, though, the message is clear: America stepped in when it counted and kept oil flowing. Critics who said we couldn’t do it should update their résumés.
Rep. Chip Roy: Iran Fears a Strong President Trump, Boost US Oil
Rep. Chip Roy went on Fox Report and said something that should land with any voter who pays for a tank of gas or worries about American sailors: Iran doesn’t want a strong President Trump. He tied recent U.S. military action and the spike in oil-market jitters straight back to energy policy and the midterms — and he didn’t sound like a man comfortable letting the conversation end with talking points.
CENTCOM’s strikes changed the math at sea — fast
U.S. Central Command says it struck and disabled three Iranian-linked crude oil tankers after the IRGC launched ballistic missiles toward two U.S. Navy warships. CENTCOM released video and a blunt public statement saying two tankers were permanently disabled and a third destroyed, and warned it could keep targeting Iran’s oil fleet if attacks continued.
That isn’t abstract military theater. Commercial transits through the Strait of Hormuz plunged and markets immediately priced in more risk. For any small-business owner who buys diesel, any farmer who drives a tractor, or any family filling up on the weekend, that drop in visible supply and rise in insurance and freight costs hits the bottom line quick enough to notice.
Why Roy says more U.S. oil matters
Roy’s on-air argument was simple: if America produces more oil at home — he invoked pushing toward “nearly fourteen million barrels” — Tehran’s leverage on global energy markets weakens, and American voters feel safer in their wallets. He framed domestic production not as a subsidy to corporations but as a strategic tool to hold Iran at bay and blunt the political power of foreign oil shocks.
That’s not just rhetoric. When a tanker in the Gulf gets disabled, someone has to pay more to move fuel, carriers reroute, and shipping insurance spikes. That ripple shows up in gas stations and grocery bills, and voters remember who they blame when prices climb and politicians shrug.
Politics, escalation risk, and the human cost
Make no mistake — every naval strike raises the odds of further retaliation. Iranian state media has threatened “more severe” reprisals and floated exclusion zones around the Strait of Hormuz. That leaves merchant mariners, Navy crews, and ordinary Americans squeezed between the need to defend our interests and the risk of a wider fight nobody wants but nobody can ignore.
Republicans like Roy are eager to turn that squeeze into a campaign message for the midterms: tougher on Tehran, loosen up domestic energy production, and explain to voters the link between geopolitics and their monthly bills. Whether the messaging resonates will depend on whether voters see results — safer seas and steady prices — or more headlines and higher costs.
There’s a clear choice here: keep pretending energy is a separate issue from national security, or treat it like what it is — a frontline tool. Which will our leaders do, and will voters hold them to it when the lights go out or the pump climbs again?
Monday, September 7, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
We’ll discuss her bizarre press conference later this morning, but New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill wants to shift focus away from the thousa...
-
U.S. President Donald Trump dances after speaking at General Motors’ Milford Proving Grounds on July 27, 2026 in Milford, Michigan. Trump i...
-
There was a horrific shooting at the Bite of Seattle food festival over the weekend. On Sunday, two suspects reportedly engaged in a gun ...
