Presumptuous Politics

Friday, March 13, 2026

CartoonDems


 








Bessent: No Price Would Make Iran War Unaffordable

Treasury Chief Bessent: No Price Would Make War Against Iran Unaffordable
Condoleezza Rice and Scott Bessent speaking to each other

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said "absolutely not" when asked Thursday whether there was any price point at which he would tell President Donald Trump the war with Iran had become unaffordable.

Bessent made the remark during a television interview as oil prices surged above $100 a barrel amid fears the widening conflict could disrupt shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow Persian Gulf waterway that normally carries roughly one-fifth of the world's oil supply, according to reporting by Reuters and the Associated Press on the war's impact on global energy markets.

Tanker traffic and shipping insurance in the region have been affected as attacks and security threats tied to the conflict raise risks for vessels moving through the Gulf, a situation energy analysts say could rattle global markets if the disruption spreads, according to coverage by Bloomberg and the Financial Times of the growing oil shock.

Iran has vowed to continue the conflict despite the economic consequences, with Iranian leaders warning this week that prolonged fighting could damage the global economy by choking off energy supplies and trade routes, statements ABC News reported were carried by Iranian state television.

Iranian officials have specifically warned that continued conflict could destabilize global energy markets by threatening shipping through the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, according to reporting by the Associated Press on the statements from Tehran.

Meanwhile, the financial cost of the war to the United States is already mounting rapidly, with Pentagon officials telling lawmakers during a congressional briefing this week that the first six days of the conflict cost at least $11.3 billion, Reuters reported Wednesday, citing officials familiar with the classified discussion.

Reuters reported that the estimate largely reflects the cost of munitions and operational expenses during the opening phase of the campaign and may not yet include longer-term costs such as replenishing weapons stockpiles, sustaining deployments, or expanding military operations.

Earlier estimates illustrated how quickly the spending mounted during the opening strikes, with the Center for Strategic and International Studies approximated the first 100 hours of operations cost roughly $3.7 billion, or about $891 million per day.

Trump has downplayed concerns about the economic fallout, arguing that defeating Iran's leadership and nuclear ambitions outweighs temporary spikes in oil prices and other economic disruptions.

Trump also said in a Truth Social post highlighted by ABC News that rising oil prices can benefit the United States because the country is the world's largest oil producer.

He also warned that Iran may attempt to weaponize energy markets after suffering military setbacks, telling Fox Business the regime is trying to create "economic chaos" by threatening shipping routes and energy infrastructure.

Bessent said the administration is exploring measures to stabilize global oil flows, including potentially allowing additional Russian crude to reach global markets in order to increase supply and ease price pressures, remarks that Mediaite reported during coverage of the Fox Business interview.

He also said the United States is supporting efforts to restore shipping confidence in the Persian Gulf, including backing a maritime insurance program for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz after insurers pulled coverage because of the conflict, according to Fox Business reporting on the interview.

Bessent added that the United States and its allies are also examining potential naval escorts for commercial tankers traveling through the strait to ensure oil shipments continue moving through the critical corridor, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal on the administration’s response to the disruptions.

Several lawmakers and policy analysts have raised concerns about the rapidly rising cost of the conflict.

Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania,

Boyle to succeed Yarmuth as top Democrat on Budget Committee – Roll Call 

 the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said lawmakers need a full accounting of the war's cost and asked the Congressional Budget Office to analyze the financial and economic impact of the conflict, according to reporting by Al Jazeera on congressional reaction to the spending estimates.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., criticized the spending tied to the conflict and said the administration was committing billions of dollars to military operations while many Americans remain under financial pressure from high living costs, Al Jazeera reported.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., RINO 

Paul opens huge fundraising edge in Kentucky Senate race | AP News 

also warned that prolonged fighting combined with oil prices above $100 per barrel could produce serious economic and political consequences if the war drags on, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal on congressional reaction to the conflict.

Budget analysts have also warned that the current spending estimates may significantly understate the ultimate price of the war because they do not fully include the cost of replacing precision weapons and missile interceptors or sustaining a prolonged military campaign, a concern highlighted in coverage of the conflict's costs by The Guardian.

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 

Hegseth Hatred Leaves Democrat Politicians and Media With Egg on Their Faces As Well As Steak and Lobster

On Monday, a most unusual attack was launched against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. Attacks on Hegseth are pretty much par for the course as he's easily the member of President Trump's cabinet most hated by the left and the mainstream media. This one was unusual not only for its superficiality, but also for the ease with which it was debunked and the number of Democrat politicians and media outlets who let their hatred of a man and an administration prevent them from ever questioning the story.

First off, if you've been in the military or federal government, you know what the procurement environment is like in September. It is the last month of the fiscal year. It is the witching hour for current fiscal year appropriations. This is when money is reprogrammed from accounts that can't spend it to those who can. Every cent has to be spent by September 30, or it is lost. Worse than lost, someone up the food chain may cut your budget since you didn't spend everything, thereby proving you were overfunded. Without tight management, it can devolve into a spending bacchanalia. Even with tight management, it would cause Ron Paul to stroke out. For some reason, The New Republic, which has degenerated from an outlet that sane people might read into a Tumblr for TDS sufferers, chose this week to cover Pentagon spending in September and was apparently unaware of the context and unwilling to ask for explanations. 

 Some of the frivolous September purchases made under Secretary Pete Hegseth’s stewardship include a $98,329 Steinway & Sons grand piano for the Air Force chief of staff’s home, $5.3 million for Apple devices such as the new iPad, and an astronomical amount of shellfish, including $2 million for Alaskan king crab and $6.9 million worth of lobster tail. (Lobster tail is apparently a favorite of Hegseth’s Pentagon—the department spent more than $7.4 million total on the luxury item in March, May, June, and October.)

In other pricey food purchases, the government decided to drop $15.1 million for ribeye steak (again, just in September), $124,000 for ice cream machines, and $139,224 on 272 orders of doughnuts.

The result was sad and hilarious. Sad that so many profoundly stupid people pretend to influence and govern us, and hilarious because laughing at self-unaware imbeciles is always fun.

The mother lode of stupid comes from Paul Begala, one of the Clinton mafiosi and alleged strategist. He was on CNN's "The Source With Kaitlan Collins" Wednesday night, where he claimed that Hegseth, personally, ate the $6.9 million in lobster tail.

NEW: CNN’s Paul Begala seems to think Pete Hegseth ate $6.9 million of lobster tail all by himself in the month of September.

Begala: He has spent $15 million in one month for ribeye steak, $6.9 million for lobster tail… all for himself.

Scott Jennings: Do you believe the… pic.twitter.com/eTU54ORgc4

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) March 12, 2026

BEGALA: You know what’s important? He [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] has spent 15 million dollars in one month for ribeye steak, 6.9 million for lobster tail, 225 million dollars for furniture. He spent more in the month of September than most countries on Earth spent in their defense. All for himself! Lobster tails!? While our troops are eating MREs!? Lobster tails!?

JENNINGS: Do you believe the secretary of defense is personally eating all the lobster? It’s for the troops!

BEGALA: Oh really? The troops are getting lobster!?

JENNINGS: Frequently in theater! Troops who are going to war.

BEGALA: Oh my God!

JENNINGS: You know that!

BEGALA: They’re getting lobster, you are so full of it!

JENNINGS: You’re gonna get killed over this, you’re gonna get killed over this. Internet, do something!

BEGALA: They get the gold mine, we get the shaft!

Here is the monumentally unfunny comedian Seth Meyers. Why does the left have to try to gaslight us into believing their comedians are funny? Don't they have real ones?

Seth Meyers (with the help of a Jen Psaki clip) joins Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert in not knowing about military surf and turf meals, "They spent $15 million on steak in one month. Who are you? Sterling Cooper Draper and Pryce? If you're gonna eat that much steak, you better… pic.twitter.com/eskqq2b3US

— Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) March 12, 2026

This man helps select federal judges and U.S. Attorneys.

While Americans struggle with the high costs of living, Donald Trump’s Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth spent millions on lobster tails?…..

Talk about a waste of taxpayer dollars. pic.twitter.com/P6tAPm5b2Q

— Adam Schiff (@SenAdamSchiff) March 11, 2026

And she's responsible for...for...well, for something that nepo-elected senators do, not really sure what that is, but it has to be important, amirite?

Leftist media also piled on.

Remember when they defunded food for hungry children a few months ago? https://t.co/FuGSYXJh9P

— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@NoLieWithBTC) March 10, 2026

There was a clue built into The New Republic story that indicated some of this might not be as frivolous as alleged had someone with an IQ on the right side of the Bell Curve written it: "(Lobster tail is apparently a favorite of Hegseth’s Pentagon—the department spent more than $7.4 million total on the luxury item in March, May, June, and October.)" Why, one might ask, is the Pentagon dropping $7 million per month on "surf and turf?"

As it turned out, the grand piano was allocated to the Air Force band. We can debate that, but portraying it as adorning the Air Force Chief of Staff's living room was dishonest.

The Steinway piano was ordered for Air House, a historic air force building that coincidentally serves as the residence for the Air Force chief of staff. On the right you'll see that it was provisioned for the "USAF Band." It's not some general's personal piano in his private… https://t.co/g2jNSh0ifW pic.twitter.com/W6dLDqWooB

— Chris (@chriswithans) March 11, 2026

The answer to the steak-and-lobster scandal was rather mundane. It was for military dining facilities, in particular those deployed in war zones, or for ships and units whose deployments had just been extended as a sort of consolation prize.

Look at these gluttonous infantrymen cooking steak on their shitty little combat outpost… what a waste of taxpayer money pic.twitter.com/gWJDWAYqZB

— Voödoo 6 von Inyanga (@6Voodoo) March 11, 2026

The reality of steak and lobster in the military. pic.twitter.com/pmeOrvFAGl

— Kagan.Dunlap (@Kagan_M_Dunlap) March 11, 2026

🔥🚨BREAKING: Pete Hegseth's Department of War is facing backlash from liberals after reportedly buying $22 mil worth of steak and lobster near the end of the spending year.

Liberals are attempting to criticize the DOW but are disregarding the fact that our government pays for… pic.twitter.com/2pzUAkyARG

— Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) March 11, 2026

Military steak and lobster (surf 'n turf) isn't what most of you are imagining. No restaurant would ever serve it because no customer would ever buy it. The steak is cheap and tough; the lobster, a small and terribly hairy variety I've never seen anywhere else. It's more of a… https://t.co/shfT1JbyaQ

— Pvt A B (@col_a_buendia) March 11, 2026

What was saddest about this bizarre, though increasingly commonplace episode was the veterans who deliberately lied about what the expense entailed for the sole purpose of damaging the reputation of a much better man. Men so utterly degraded by their political stances that they have totally lost any vestigial sense of honor they once had.

Even though Adam Kinzinger never got closer to combat than shooting some reporter (Watch: Senate Candidate Steps on One Last Rake, Justifying Wounding a Reporter – RedState), there is no doubt he experienced steak-and-lobster nights departing on or returning from deployments.

DOGE said it was cutting government waste.
So they gutted USAID — the agency that feeds starving people around the world.
Meanwhile the Pentagon spent millions on lobster, ribeye, and even a $98,000 piano. (link in reply) pic.twitter.com/AUgtVQmMkj

— Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@AdamKinzinger) March 11, 2026

And there is Colorado Democrat Jason Crowe, a person (I won't use the term "man") with several combat deployments who participated in these meals and is now pretending it is a scandal.

Pete Hegseth is spending millions of your tax dollars on lobster, ribeye, and a grand piano.

Meanwhile, he’s sending Americans off to war and folks are struggling to get by. https://t.co/wApmTlF4o7

— Rep. Jason Crow (@RepJasonCrow) March 11, 2026

This retired colonel sums up Crowe the best.

How many times did you eat steak and lobster when you were downrange, you Blue Falcon filth?

HOW MANY TIMES?

Answer the question. https://t.co/fqJB4kHJ1A

— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) March 12, 2026

If you're not familiar with the term Blue Falcon, never say I wasn't generous with my time.

The minions of the left are after Hegseth because he not only has stopped their "long march through the institutions" at the Pentagon, he is actively uprooting what they planted and sowing salt into the earth. But if this is the best they can do, he has nothing to worry about.

 

President Trump Issues Chilling Warning to ‘Deranged Scumbags’ in Iran Today, Says US Winning the War

President Trump unleashed a blistering broadside against Iran's leadership early Friday morning, declaring on Truth Social that the United States is "totally destroying" the terrorist regime.

Whether it be militarily, economically, or in every facet of the ongoing military operations, Iran is suffering the wrath of the American military.

"We are totally destroying the terrorist regime of Iran, militarily, economically, and otherwise, yet, if you read the Failing New York Times, you would incorrectly think that we are not winning," the President wrote. "Iran’s Navy is gone, their Air Force is no longer, missiles, drones, and everything else are being decimated, and their leaders have been wiped from the face of the earth."

 Trump is referring to recent New York Times coverage of Operation Epic Fury that he views as downplaying American military successes.

The President also issued a stark, personal warning to the regime.

"We have unparalleled firepower, unlimited ammunition, and plenty of time - Watch what happens to these deranged scumbags today," he threatened. "They’ve been killing innocent people all over the world for 47 years, and now I, as the 47th President of the United States of America, am killing them. What a great honor it is to do so!"


READ MORE: Tragic Loss: CENTCOM Confirms Four American Heroes Killed in Iraq Non-Combat Crash

Have Iran's Mullahs Cut and Run for a Safer Locale Than Tehran?


It's unclear if the President is referring to a continued bombardment of Iran or if he's signaling an escalation will be seen across the rogue nation on Friday.

Regardless, this is an effective framing of Operation Epic Fury as a long-overdue reckoning for 47 years of bloodshed against innocents worldwide.

The President, during an interview on Fox News radio, also addressed rumors that Iran's current "Supreme Leader," Mojtaba Khamenei, is dead. The son of the recently deceased Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not been seen in public since being named to his new role, and issued a statement that was read on Iranian state TV on his behalf.

“I think he probably is (alive)," Trump said. "I think he is damaged, but I think he’s probably alive in some form, you know.”

Trump said the new Supreme Leader is doing "a lot of talking," but he's "going to have to put up."

The Sun is reporting that Khamenei has been critically wounded, to the extent that he may be missing limbs and in a coma. The New York Post reports milder injuries, including a "fractured foot (and) face injuries," that he suffered on the first day of military strikes.

While none of these have been confirmed, Trump's assessment that he is "damaged" but "probably alive" suggests he knows something. And when the President knows something, the "deranged scumbags" might want to scatter.

Keep your head on a swivel, Mojtaba.

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all.


This CNN Reporter's Tweet About Trump, Polling, and Iran Is Laughably Predictable

Aaron Blake - Senior Reporter | CNN
Aaron Blake on CNN

Oh, they’re so close—they’re always so close. Polling Donald Trump is nearly impossible. It’s never been accurate. It was wrong in 2016, 2020, and 2024. The weekly approval ratings are always underestimating the real figure. Also, when your oversampling Democrats, which is always the case among mainstream outlets, the accuracy becomes even more unpredictable.

 Take the Washington Post, whose polling on the war saw a drastic change from last week [emphasis mine]: 

What do Americans think about the U.S. war with Iran, and how have their opinions shifted since the conflict began?

A Washington Post poll of 1,005 Americans finds less opposition to the U.S. military actions than when they began, although more people still would prefer that the strikes stop than continue. A steady majority say the Trump administration has not clearly explained the war’s goals, and most say the number of U.S. casualties — including seven service members reported killed in action — is unacceptable. Many Americans are still making up their minds on the military campaign or hold a mix of positive and negative views about it. 

A Post poll shortly after the strikes began found 39 percent supported “President Trump ordering airstrikes against Iran,” while 52 percent opposed them and 9 percent were unsure. The new poll asked generally about the “U.S. military campaign against Iran,” finding 42 percent support it, 40 percent oppose it, and 17 percent are unsure. The absence of President Donald Trump in the new poll’s question may have led more people to say they are “unsure,” as views about the president tend to color people’s opinions of his actions and policies.

Aaron Blake, now with CNN, hit it on the head, though he doesn’t say it: Democrats are simply not serious people.

Last week, WaPo's poll showed Americans opposed "Trump ordering airstrikes against Iran," 52-39.

This week, they're about evenly split on the "U.S. military campaign against Iran" -- 42% support, 40% oppose.

Why the difference? Possibly because the 2nd question didn't mention…

— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) March 12, 2026

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 


Huh? Dems Are Going to Try and Hurt Trump Over This?

Huh? Dems Are Going to Try and Hurt Trump Over This?

I don’t want to hear it. They complain about everything, especially when Trump is involved. Operation Epic Fury is not some nation-building exercise, so can we please stop the panic over gas prices? The Trump administration is monitoring the situation, easing some oil-based sanctions, and offering escorts for oil tankers to safely navigate the Strait of Hormuz. 

Some price spikes might occur, but that’s what happens, especially with these operations. This war is one of self-defense. But leave it to Democrats to try to tear down our commander-in-chief, as they’ve always done when a Republican must use the military (via The Hill):

Democrats are pouncing on a spike in gas prices and expected soaring airline fares, blaming President Trump’s handling of the war in Iran for deepening economic pain on Americans.


 In interviews, statements and in a flurry of social media posts, Democrats have sharpened their arguments — repeatedly linking Trump’s decision to enter the Iran conflict to the price spikes, while accusing Republicans of downplaying their impact.  

“It’s show-and-tell time for Democrats,” said Democratic strategist Anthony Coley. “Show people the receipts — the family that canceled their summer trip because airfare spiked, the small business owner eating higher fuel costs.”  

“Then tell them exactly what Democrats would do differently,” Coley added. “Trump promised lower prices on day one. His chaos delivered the opposite.” 

Democrats presided over an inflation crisis, touted a million jobs that never existed, depleted the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and cared little about the supply chain crisis—all of this occurring under President half-brain-dead Biden.  

So, please spare us and stop acting like things would be better with you people in charge. You’d allow Tehran to get a nuclear weapon. They would have it by now if Democrats were still in the Oval. 

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 



 

UFC and FBI announce training partnership at Quantico Academy

(L-top) FBI Director Kash Patel. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images) / (L-bottom) UFC president Dana White on June 27, 2025. (Photo by Steve Marcus/Getty Images) / (R) President Trump attends the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event on March 9, 2024.

In a first-of-its-kind collaboration, the UFC and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officially announced on Wednesday a partnership to host an exclusive training seminar for special agents.

The two-day event, scheduled for March 14th and 15th, 2026, will reportedly bring elite mixed martial arts (MMA) athletes to the FBI Special Agent Academy to share high-level defensive tactics and conditioning insights with both academy students and senior staff.

The initiative is designed to provide agents with “innovative training options” as they prepare for the physical rigors of field assignments. UFC matchmaker Mick Maynard and a hand-picked “all-star” crew of fighters will lead the sessions. 

 Instructor Lineup

 

The seminar features a roster of some of the most recognizable names in combat sports history.

  • Justin Gaethje: Current interim UFC Lightweight Champion
  • Jorge Masvidal: The first-ever UFC “BMF” Champion
  • Chris Weidman: Former UFC Middleweight Champion
  • Michael Chandler: Top-ranked Lightweight contender
  • Renzo Gracie: MMA legend and world-renowned Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu master
  • Claudia Gadelha & Manel Kape: Former title challengers and elite contenders

Defensive Techniques

This module focuses on functional combat agility rather than static drills. Agents are being trained in “Close Quarters Combat” (CQC) by grappling specialists like Chris Weidman and Renzo Gracie. The emphasis is on “clinch work” and “takedown defense,” using the “cage-work” principles of the Octagon to help agents control suspects against walls or in confined spaces.

 

Regarding high-efficiency striking, Michael Chandler and Jorge Masvidal will demonstrate how to use “dirty boxing” and short-range strikes to create space or neutralize a threat when a weapon cannot be immediately deployed.

It will also train agents transitioning from traditional law enforcement “pain compliance” to Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) techniques that provide total skeletal control over an opponent.

Mental Preparation

 

The “mindset” portion of the seminar will be led by UFC matchmaker Mick Maynard and veteran fighters to bridge the gap between sports psychology and field survival.

Agents will be trained to maintain fine motor skills while under the extreme “red-zone” heart rates experienced during a championship fight. Justin Gaethje, known for his “calm in the chaos” style, will also provide insight into reading an opponent’s micro-movements to anticipate aggression before it happens.

To learn “elite resilience,” they will be Instructed on the “championship mindset” — recovering from a physical or psychological blow instantly to stay in the fight.

 

Physical Conditioning

The FBI is looking to “revamp” its current fitness standards by adopting the UFC Performance Institute’s (PI) data-driven approach. They will move away from standard distance running and push-ups toward High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) that mimics the 5-minute bursts of an MMA round.

Claudia Gadelha will demonstrate MMA-specific stretching and recovery protocols designed to keep agents physically “operational” for longer careers, reducing the wear and tear of tactical gear.

Regarding combat-specific endurance, agents will learn drills that prioritize “explosive” movements (bursts of speed/power) over steady-state cardio, which is more applicable to short, violent encounters.

“Our UFC fighters are some of the baddest men and women on the planet,” said UFC CEO Dana White. “They are heading to Quantico to train the best FBI agents in mixed martial arts. We’re proud to support the FBI in strengthening their defense techniques.”

The partnership marks a significant cultural shift for the Bureau under Director Kash Patel, who has prioritized a more modern, “fitness-forward” persona for the agency. Patel, a longtime UFC enthusiast, emphasized that the seminar is part of a broader push to ensure agents are “even better prepared to protect the American people.”

“This is a tremendous opportunity for our FBI agents to learn and train with some of the greatest athletes on earth,” Patel said. “Dana White has changed the game in the MMA industry, and we are extremely honored to be partnered with him.”

Meanwhile, the collaboration is the latest sign of the deepening relationship between the UFC and the Trump administration. It serves as a precursor to the highly anticipated “Freedom Fights 250” event, a UFC cage match scheduled to take place on the White House South Lawn on June 14th to celebrate the nation’s 250th anniversary.

While some critics have questioned the applicability of sport-fighting to law enforcement lethal-force scenarios, the FBI maintains that the seminar offers a unique perspective for cadets who are about to enter field offices across the globe.


UFC Freedom 250: White House Showdown Defies Elite Narratives

YouTube video player

The UFC’s much-talked-about Freedom 250 is now set for the South Lawn of the White House on June 14, 2026, a bold and unapologetically patriotic staging of sport that celebrates America’s 250th. This isn’t your usual corporate arena spectacle; it’s a gathering on the most iconic lawn in the land, and fans should expect a night that mixes raw competition with real national pride.

In one of the most intriguing matchups, bantamweight stalwart Aiemann Zahabi will face the flash and nickname of the division, Sean O’Malley,

Sean O'Malley will face Aiemann Zahabi at the UFC White House card 🚨 

 a bout that promises to be a contrast between grinders and showmen. Zahabi has publicly embraced the assignment, calling it a massive opportunity and a title-eliminator that could launch him higher up the ladder, remarks he made after being tapped for the card.

Oddsmakers may favor the flashy American star on paper, but that only makes Zahabi’s quiet confidence more compelling for patriotic fans tired of narratives handed down by the coastal elites. DraftKings opened O’Malley as the betting favorite, which should only motivate the underdog and every working-class fan who loves an upset.

 This White House card is branded UFC Freedom 250 for a reason — it’s tied to the nation’s 250th anniversary and puts American tradition front and center at a time when we need reminders of strength and resilience. Rather than sneer at toughness, conservatives should celebrate an event that brings the fighting spirit of ordinary men and women to the heart of government and the people’s house.

Zahabi’s recent run — a streak of wins that has earned him a top contender spot — is exactly the kind of grit the country respects: hard work, steady improvement, and results when it matters. O’Malley is a talented former champion with flair, but this matchup favors no one until the bell rings, and that uncertainty is the essence of sport and the sort of meritocracy America still honors.

Come June 14, Americans will get more than an evening of fists and footwork; they’ll see a celebration of competition, a pushback against sour elites who mock patriotism, and a reminder that courage and confidence still win respect. Tune in, cheer for the underdog if you love grit, and take pride that the nation’s anniversary will be marked by true American toughness on the White House lawn.

 

Fetterman Breaks Ranks: A Wake-Up Call for American National Security

YouTube video player

Senator John Fetterman’s recent break with the Democratic establishment is the kind of wake-up call America’s national security debate desperately needed. After U.S.-Israeli strikes that intelligence officials say killed Iran’s supreme leader, Tehran moved quickly to anoint Mojtaba Khamenei as his successor — a choice that has roiled capitals and put pressure on every elected official to pick a side.

Fetterman didn’t couch his stance in partisan euphemisms; speaking on national television he said he supported the strikes and called the action “entirely appropriate,” rejecting his party’s reflexive opposition to anything connected to President Trump. That bluntness from a high-profile Democrat is rare, and it exposes how detached many in the party have become from basic priorities like American safety and deterrence.

Meanwhile, reports that President Trump would back an allied operation to remove Iran’s newly installed supreme leader if Tehran refuses to cooperate have sent the regime into further panic and the media into predictable hysteria. Multiple outlets have relayed that the administration is prepared to back strong allied measures to compel Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions — a posture that, whether you call it pressure or leverage, is exactly what deterrence looks like.

 Not surprisingly, the Democratic caucus has fractured, with some members demanding congressional war-powers checks while others quietly acknowledge the necessity of decisive action against a regime that has menaced America and our allies for decades. This split proves the argument conservatives have been making for years: foreign policy driven by ideology and performative virtue signaling puts Americans at risk, and it’s past time politicians prioritize security over optics.

Patriots should applaud any public servant willing to put country above party, and Fetterman’s courage to buck his tribe should be a model for others. We need more leaders who understand that showing strength — and backing our allies — is the language of peace, not cowardice disguised as diplomacy.

Voters must remember who stood with America when the chips were down and who defaulted to partisan reflex. Come election time, the men and women who defended our safety — not those who played politics with it — deserve our support and our vote.

 

CartoonDems