U.S.
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has made top headlines for some
controversial topics. Here is everything you need to know about her
journey from being born in Somalia to becoming a U.S. Representative.
Rep. Ilhan Omar,
D-Minn., repeatedly violated state rules when she used campaign funds
to pay for personal out-of-state travel as well as help on her tax
returns and must reimburse her former campaign committee nearly $3,500, Minnesota campaign finance officials ruled Thursday.
The Minnesota
Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board said the
first-term congresswoman also must pay the state a $500 civil penalty
for using campaign money to travel to Florida, where she accepted an
honorarium.
"Rep.
Omar must personally reimburse the Omar committee $3,469.23," the
report concludes. "This reimbursement payment is the total amount of
campaign funds that were used for purposes not permitted by statute in
2016 and 2017. Rep. Omar must provide documentation within 30 days from
the date of this order showing the deposit of the reimbursement into the
Omar committee’s account."
Additionally, conservative commentators pointed out that the Board's report
revealed Omar and her current husband, Ahmed Hirsi, filed joint tax
returns in 2014 and 2015, when Omar was reportedly married to another
man. Omar engaged in a civil marriage with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009,
and the couple separated in 2011 without formally petitioning for
divorce until 2017.
Prior to her marriage with Elmi, Omar had
reportedly wed Hirsi in the Muslim "faith tradition," but the couple
separated shortly afterwards. Omar did not officially marry Hirsi until
2018, after reconciling with him and splitting with Elmi.
Tax experts say the IRS only permits joint filings if a couple is in a state that legally recognizes the couple as married.
"Time to get federal IRS officials involved?" asked conservative blogger Michelle Malkin. "What say you all?"
"A sitting congresswoman may have filed EIGHT YEARS of fraudulent, felonious, tax returns," added writer David Steinberg, who authored a Twitter thread flagging the issue.
'The
crisis committee had Frederick & Rosen prepare releases for Rep.
Omar and Mr. Hirsi to sign in order for Frederick & Rosen to obtain
Rep. Omar’s and Mr. Hirsi’s filed joint tax returns for 2014 and 2015,"
the report notes. "Frederick & Rosen then reviewed the documents
obtained from the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of the Omar
committee. However, there is no substantive evidence in the record to
show that the services benefitted the Omar committee, and the Omar
committee has failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
the services from Frederick & Rosen were a permitted noncampaign
disbursement under Minnesota Statutes section 211B.12. Rep. Omar must
reimburse the committee the $1,500 that was paid to the Kjellberg Law
Firm for the services from Frederick & Rosen, Ltd."
That reference to Omar and Hirsi's joint filing, however, was not investigated or addressed further in the report.
The
board found that Omar's campaign bought her a plane ticket to Boston,
where she spoke at a political rally; paid for a hotel in Washington,
D.C., where Omar participated in an interview for the United Nations
Foundation's Girl UP conference; and covered her travel to Chicago to
accept an award and attend a fundraising luncheon.
Under
Minnesota law, campaign trips must be related to serving in office. Omar
was a state representative from Minneapolis at the time of the
violations. She was elected to the U.S. House last November.
Republican
state Rep. Steve Drazkowski initially raised the complaints against
Omar, suggesting that she used $2,250 in campaign funds to pay a lawyer
for her divorce proceedings. Omar has said those payments to her
attorney were campaign-related fees.
The board found the
payment was actually reimbursement to two other law firms for work
related to immigration and tax documents. The board also determined that
$1,500 spent to correct an issue on Omar's tax return was not a
campaign-related expense and must be returned.
According to the
board, evidence indicates that the $2,250 was not payment for Omar's
marital dissolution. The board directed Omar to file an amended report
with more information about the law firm payments.
Omar had called the claims politically
motivated. In a statement, her congressional campaign said she is "glad
this process is complete" and that she intends to comply with the
board's findings.
Omar also claimed, "We have been collaborative
in this process and are glad the report showed that none of the money
was used for personal use, as was initially alleged."
However, the report specifically found that there was "some personal benefit to Rep. Omar from the [legal] services."
Drazkowski
said in a statement that the results provide "no reassurance to
Minnesotans," and the report "raises even more troubling questions." Fox News' Sam Dorman and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The news – plus barbs from social media trolls and other critics -- may be too much for CNN’s Don Lemon to bear much longer.
The host of “CNN Tonight” told an audience in New York City on Thursday that the current “level of toxicity” in society – which he attributed to the Trump presidency – has him questioning whether he’ll still be on the air when the 2020 presidential election rolls around, according to reports.
“I
don’t know if it’s worth this level of toxicity,” the 53-year-old Lemon
said about continuing in his current position, the Daily Beast
reported.
“I’m
10 years older than when he rode down the escalator in July 2015,”
Lemon added, referring to Donald Trump's campaign announcement four
years ago.
Lemon made the remarks at the Financial Times’ “Future of News” conference.
The anchor also spoke about the negative, unsolicited feedback he sometimes receives.
“I
was doing a shoot in the park the other day and someone shouted at me,
‘I’m sick of watching you. We built this country. I can’t wait for CNN
to fire your black a--, you f----t,'” he recalled, according to
Deadline.
“So, all of those sorts of people call you on the phone
and say those things, or they write you. I don’t go on social media
anymore, it’s so toxic,” he added.
Lemon went on to blame the Trump era, and even the president himself.
“I’m
black and gay on cable television in prime time — a unicorn — and I’m a
target of the right, a target of white extremists, neo-Nazis and of the
president,” Lemon said, according to Deadline.
He added later, “ I wonder how long I will continue to do this particular job,” the Daily Beast reported.
Lemon speculated he might be happier as a celebrity chef, or perhaps doing journalism “in a different way.”
Mexican authorities stop a migrant caravan that had earlier
crossed the Mexico - Guatemala border, near Metapa, Chiapas state,
Mexico, Wednesday, June 5, 2019. (AP Photo/Marco Ugarte)
With just days to go until the Trump administration is set to impose punishing tariffs
on Mexico unless the country halts the unprecedented flow of illegal
immigrants across the southern border, numerous signs that Mexico would
capitulate emerged Thursday -- but it remained unclear Friday
morning whether their efforts would satisfy the White House.
Reports in
the evening indicated that Mexico's negotiators with Washington have
offered to immediately deploy 6,000 National Guard troops to the border
with Guatemala. Additionally, Mexico has reportedly agreed to a major
overhaul of reasonable asylum protocols, which would require asylum
applicants to seek permanent refuge in the first country they arrive in
after fleeing their home countries.
For virtually all Central
American migrants, that country would not be the United States. The
Trump administration has already begun requiring asylum applicants to wait in Mexico
while their claims are processed, saying too many applicants were using
the system fraudulently to escape into the country. Last month, the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request to stop that practice temporarily.
However,
two administration officials tell Fox News that while talks have been
going well with Mexico, and that Mexico is making some fresh proposals,
there is not yet a deal that U.S. officials are sure to imminently
accept.
Also on Thursday, Mexico's financial intelligence agency
announced it had frozen the bank accounts of 26 people who it claimed
"have presumably participated in migrant smuggling and the organization
of illegal migrant caravans."
The agency said it had detected
money transfers from central Mexico to six Mexican border cities
presumably related to the caravans.
Mexican President Andrés
Manuel López Obrador insisted on Thursday that the Mexican government
does not "act against anybody to please any foreign government."
Mexican authorities stop a migrant caravan that had earlier
crossed the Mexico - Guatemala border, near Metapa, Chiapas state,
Mexico, Wednesday, June 5, 2019. (AP Photo/Marco Ugarte)
Meanwhile, some 200 Mexican military police,
immigration agents and federal police blocked the advance of about 1,000
Central American migrants who were walking north along a southern
Mexico highway on Wednesday, once again showing a tougher new stance on
attempts to use the country as a stepping-stone to the U.S.
The
group of migrants, including many women and children, set out early from
Ciudad Hidalgo at the Mexico-Guatemala border and was headed for
Tapachula, the principal city in the region. State and local police
accompanied the caravan.
The officials blocked the highway near the community of Metapa, about 11 miles from Tapachula.
Unarmed
agents wrestled some migrants who resisted to the ground, but the vast
majority complied and boarded buses or immigration agency vans. Some
migrants fainted and fell to the ground. One young man who collapsed was
taken for medical attention.
That afternoon, in Mexico City,
police detained Irineo Mujica, the head of migrant aide group Pueblo Sin
Fronteras, and Cristobal Sanchez, a migrant activist.
Vice
President Mike Pence, monitoring the talks from his travels in
Pennsylvania, said the U.S. was "encouraged" by Mexico's latest
proposals but, so far, tariffs still were set to take effect Monday.
Trump, in announcing the tariffs last week, promised that they would swiftly increase if no action was taken. The president declared Wednesday evening that "not nearly enough" progress was being made in last-minute negotiations with Mexico.
"On
June 10th, the United States will impose a 5% Tariff on all goods
coming into our Country from Mexico, until such time as illegal migrants
coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP," Trump said on May 30. "The
Tariff will gradually increase until the Illegal Immigration problem is
remedied, ... ..at which time the Tariffs will be removed. Details from
the White House to follow."
Fox News is told the tariff on all
goods by land, sea, and air from Mexico will hike to 10 percent on July 1
-- and potentially increase substantially from there.
"If Mexico
still has not taken action to dramatically reduce or eliminate the
number of illegal aliens crossing its territory into the United States,
Tariffs will be increased to 15 percent on August 1, 2019, to 20 percent
on September 1, 2019, and to 25 percent on October 1, 2019," Trump said in a statement released
later by the White House on Thursday. "Tariffs will permanently remain
at the 25 percent level unless and until Mexico substantially stops the
illegal inflow of aliens coming through its territory."
The
statement added: "Thousands of innocent lives are taken every year as a
result of this lawless chaos. It must end NOW! ... Mexico’s passive
cooperation in allowing this mass incursion constitutes an emergency and
extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United
States."
Specifically, White House sources told Fox News that
Mexico would need to step up security efforts on the border, target
transnational smugglers, crack down on illicit bus lines and align with
the U.S. on a workable asylum policy. Mexico could use certain so-called
choke points on the southern border to curb illegal migration sharply,
according to the sources.
Arrests along the southern border have
skyrocketed in recent months, with border agents making more than
100,000 arrests or denials of entry in March, a 12-year
high. Immigration courts that process asylum claims currently have faced
a backlog of more than 800,000 cases and asylum applicants increasingly
have been staying in the U.S. even after their claims for asylum have
been denied.
More than 4,000 individuals have been apprehended at
the border with children who are not their own in recent
months, administration officials tell Fox News.
FILE - This May 29, 2019 file photo released by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shows some of 1,036 migrants who crossed the
U.S.-Mexico border in El Paso, Texas, the largest that the Border Patrol
says it has ever encountered. (U.S. Customs and Border Protection via
AP, File)
And, Customs and Border Protection said it
apprehended or turned away over 109,000 migrants attempting to cross the
border in April, the second month in a row the number has topped
100,000.
In a dramatic moment, more than 1,000 illegal immigrants were apprehended by border agents near the U.S.-Mexico border
last week -- the largest ever group of migrants ever apprehended at a
single time, sources told Fox News. The group of 1,036 illegal
immigrants found in the El Paso sector included migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, according to sources.
The
Trump administration has heavily focused on asylum law reforms, making
the current reported Mexican overtures in that area particularly
important. Asylum law, conservatives point out, is intended to shield
individuals from near-certain death or persecution on account of
limited factors like religious or political affiliation — not poor
living conditions and economic despair.
Last year, the Justice Department eliminated gang violence and domestic abuse as a possible justification for seeking asylum.
Most
asylum applicants are ultimately rejected for having an insufficient or
unfounded personalized fear of persecution, following a full hearing of
their case before an asylum officer or an immigration judge. Fox News' John Roberts and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
President Trump has taken the gloves off in his ongoing feud with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Speaking exclusively to Fox News’ Laura Ingraham
in Normandy, France, in an interview that aired Thursday, the president
first took time to pay tribute to the heroes who fought on D-Day 75
years ago, describing them as “incredibly brave people” who displayed
incredible “valor.”
Then, the president switched gears, slamming
Pelosi, D-Calif., as a “nasty, vindictive, horrible person” -- after
saying he had “tried to be nice to her.”
“I think she’s a
disgrace. I actually don’t think she’s a talented person, I’ve tried to
be nice to her because I would have liked to have gotten some deals
done,” Trump said on “The Ingraham Angle.”
“She’s
incapable of doing deals, she’s a nasty, vindictive, horrible person,
the Mueller report came out, it was a disaster for them.”
Trump then referenced former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, suggesting some Democrats hoped it would give them the so-called silver bullet to take him down.
More from Fox News Flash
“They
thought their good friend Bobby Mueller was going to give them a great
report and he came out with a report with 13 horrible, angry Democrats
who are totally biased against me,” the president told Ingraham.
“A couple of them worked for Hillary Clinton,
they then added five more, also Democrats. With all of that,
two-and-a-half years, think of it, from before I even got elected,
they’ve been going after me and they have nothing.”
Ingraham then
asked Trump if he cared whether or not Mueller would testify publicly
about his report. The president used the question as another chance to
unload on Pelosi.
“Let
me tell you, he made such a fool out of himself the last time she --
because what people don’t report is the letter he had to do to
straighten out his testimony because his testimony was wrong but Nancy
Pelosi, I call her nervous Nancy, Nancy Pelosi doesn’t talk about it,”
Trump told Fox News.
“Nancy Pelosi’s a disaster, OK, she’s a
disaster and let her do what she wants, you know what? I think they’re
in big trouble because when you look at the kind of crimes that were
committed, and I don’t need any more evidence, and I guess from what I’m
hearing there’s a lot of evidence coming in.
“And then ask Nancy,
why is her district [having] drug needles all over the place? It’s the
most disgusting thing what she’s allowed to happen to her district, with
needles, with drug addicts... with people living on the sidewalk.”
Trump continued, referencing Pelosi’s reported comment to fellow top Democrats that she would like to see him in “prison.”
“It
was a horrible, nasty, vicious statement while I’m overseas... She
didn’t want to – she is a terrible person and I’ll tell you her name,
it’s nervous Nancy because she’s a nervous wreck.”
Pelosi, as
Politico reported, made the remark while defending her stance against
impeaching the president in an evening meeting with House Judiciary
Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and other top Democrats.
“I
don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison,” she
said, according to multiple Democratic sources familiar with the
meeting. House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Oversight
Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal,
D-Mass., and Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., also
reportedly attended the meeting.
Trump also discussed his potential 2020 opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, during his interview with Ingraham.
After
being asked about Biden downplaying the potential threat of China to
the U.S. at a recent town-hall event, Trump said: “He just doesn't get
it, he just doesn't get it.”
“How happy would President Xi be to
have Joe Biden be the nominee of the Democratic party,” Ingraham
followed up, to which the president replied: “Well he wants him, he
wants him.”
Elsewhere during the president’s wide-ranging
interview with Ingraham, he said Mueller made “such a fool” out of
himself last week when he delivered his first and only public statement
about the Russia investigation.
“Let me tell you, he made such a
fool out of himself ... because what people don’t report is the letter
he had to do to straighten out his testimony because his testimony was
wrong,” Trump told Ingraham.
Trump was referring to Mueller’s
initial suggestion that the president was not charged with an
obstruction-of-justice offense because of longstanding Justice
Department policy.
“Charging
the president with a crime was not an option we could consider,”
Mueller said last week, citing an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion
stating that a sitting president could not be indicted.
“If we had
confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would
have said that. ... We concluded that we would not reach a determination
one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime,”
Mueller said. Fox News' Brooke Singman contributed to this report.