WASHINGTON
(AP) — Congress has headed home for the holidays leaving plans and a
possible timeline for President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in
disarray.
Democratic
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi insisted Thursday that Senate Republicans
must provide details on witnesses and testimony before she would send
over the charges for Trump’s trial. No deal, replied Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell after meeting with his Senate Democratic
counterpart.
“We remain at an impasse,” he said.
As
darkness fell and lawmakers prepared to depart for the year, McConnell
wondered from the Senate floor why in the world the Republicans should
give ground to persuade House Democrats “to send us something we do not
want.”
McConnell
and the Democrats’ Senate leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, met for
about 20 minutes in their first attempt to negotiate the contours of an
agreement on running the rare Senate impeachment trial that was expected
to start in January.
McConnell
favors a swift trial, without the new witnesses Democrats want, and he
holds a clear tactical advantage if he can keep his 53-member Senate
majority united. Schumer, who also met privately with Pelosi, has to bet
that GOP senators won’t hold the line and Republicans will peel away as
public pressure mounts for a fuller trial.
For the record, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he had met with Trump and “he is demanding his day in court.”
McConnell,
who has drawn criticism for saying he won’t be an impartial juror, said
the Democrats were “too afraid″ to send the charges to the Senate,
where Trump would be expected to be acquitted by the Republican
majority.
We’ll see, he said, “whether the House Democrats ever work up the courage to take their accusations to trial.”
Pelosi
said that McConnell “says it’s OK for the foreman of the jury to be in
cahoots with the lawyers of the accused. That doesn’t sound right to
us.”
Dismissing
the idea that Democrats would hold off the proceeding indefinitely to
prevent Trump from being acquitted, Schumer said there will almost
certainly be a trial.
“There’s an obligation under the Constitution to have a trial,” Schumer told The Associated Press.
He
noted that even the Democratic senators campaigning for the party’s
presidential nomination, with early state voting starting in February,
are prepared to return to Washington to sit for the days-long
proceedings. “The Constitution requires it,” he said.
Wednesday
night’s House vote, almost entirely along party lines, made the
president just the third in U.S. history to be impeached. The House impeached Trump
on two charges — abusing his presidential power and obstructing
Congress — stemming from his pressure on Ukraine to announce
investigations of his political rival as Trump withheld U.S. aid.
Pelosi’s
procedural delay in taking the next step — apparently in search of
leverage with Senate Republicans in locking in trial arrangements —
threw a wrench into the expected timing.
“So
far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us,” she had said
Wednesday night. On Thursday at the Capitol, she said, “We’d like to see
a fair process, but we’ll see what they have and will be ready for
whatever it is.”
Trump mocked on Twitter: “Now the Do Nothing Party want to Do Nothing with the Articles.”
Both parties said public opinion was with them after the House impeachment vote.
Trump claimed polling showed him leading all potential Democratic opponents for next fall’s election.
Pelosi
said, “We’ve been hearing from people all over the country. Seems like
people have a spring in their step because the president was held
accountable for his reckless behavior.”
With
elections in mind, Trump welcomed Democratic Rep. Jeff Van Drew into
the GOP after the New Jersey freshman said he would be changing parties
because he opposed impeachment.
Pelosi,
pressed about next steps for impeachment, wouldn’t say. She and her
Democrats are insisting on more witnesses, testimony and documents than
McConnell appears willing to provide before they name the House
“managers” who would prosecute Trump in the Senate.
“The
next thing will be when we see the process that is set forth in the
Senate,” Pelosi said. “Then we’ll know the number of managers we may
have to go forward and who we would choose.”
Not yet.
On
the Senate floor, McConnell described the House actions against Trump
as “the most rushed, least thorough and most unfair impeachment inquiry
in modern history.”
Fighting
back using McConnell’s own words, Schumer said the Republican leader
was plotting the “most rushed, least thorough and most unfair”
impeachment trial in history by declining to agree to call witnesses,
including former Trump national security adviser John Bolton, who
declined to testify before the House.
“McConnell
claimed the impeachment was motivated by partisan rage,” said Schumer.
“This from the man who said proudly, ‘I am not impartial.’
“What hypocrisy.”
___
Associated Press writers Alan Fram and Lisa Mascaro contributed to this report.
Sen. Bernie Sanders sparked a range of responses on social media after Thursday night's Democratic presidential debate in Los Angeles with a comment he made as a moderator was asking him about recent comments by former President Barack Obama.
“Senator Sanders, you are the oldest candidate onstage … ” Politico magazine’s Tim Alberta began.
"And I’m white as well," the 78-year-old Sanders interjected before Alberta could finish.
"Yes,"
Alberta replied, amid what seemed like an awkward silence at Loyola
Marymount University. Alberta then continued with his question.
“How do you respond to what the former president had to say?”
Alberta had asked Sanders to respond to comments Obama made in Singapore earlier in the week.
“Former
President Obama said this week when asked who should be running
countries that if women were in charge you’d see a significant
improvement on just about everything,” Alberta pointed out. “He also
said, ‘If you look at the world and look at the problems, it’s usually
old people, usually old men not getting out of the way.'”
Sanders
responded: “I got a lot of respect for Barack Obama. I think I disagree
with him on this one," prompting some audible laughter from the
audience. “Maybe a little self-serving, but I do disagree.”
He then said the U.S. was becoming an "oligarchy" with an economy that serves only the "one percent."
“Here
is the issue. The issue is where power resides in America. And it’s not
white or black or male or female. We are living in a nation
increasingly becoming an oligarchy. We have a handful of billionaires
who spend hundreds of millions of dollars buying elections and
politicians.
“You have more income and wealth inequality today
than at any time since the 1920s. We are the only major country on Earth
not to guarantee health care for all people, which is why we need
Medicare-for-all. We are facing an existential crisis of climate change…
“The
issue is not old or young or male or female,” Sanders continued. “The
issue is working people standing up. Taking on the billionaire class.
And creating a government and an economy that works for all. Not just
the one percent.”
But some critics on social media fired back at
Sanders, saying his age, gender and race were all factors that helped
him become wealthy.
“But @BernieSanders would like us to believe
that being a White male doesn't give him and his ilk any systemic
advantages,” one Twitter user wrote.
Others accused Sanders of being a hypocrite -- given he criticizes the rich but reportedly owns three homes.
Several
pointed to what they described as “awkward silence” and “crickets” in
the crowd after Sanders’ “I’m white as well,” quip failed to resonate.
But mostly people online seemed unsure what the comment meant. Some
asked Sanders to explain what he was trying to say while others had
their own interpretations.
“Does this count as "White Supremacy" ???” one user wrote, tagging Sanders and Obama.
Another user asked: “Can you elaborate as to that response?”
“Oof! "And I'm White As Well" is not the bumper sticker Bernie Sanders needs,” a third chimed in.
One user seemed to defend Sanders, saying that being a white man was now considered "political baggage."
"Of
course white men have privilege. But in today's environment, it's
political baggage as well. It was a question about diversity and on that
page, all that goes against Sanders. It was a self deprecating moment,"
she wrote.
One person applauded the remark, saying Sanders was acknowledging his own “white privilege.”
“Bernie
Sanders, so far, is the only white candidate to say this tonight and
recognize white privilege. I think that's worth something,” Charlotte
Clymer wrote.
Another
user said Sanders' remark was "his middle finger to the gender and
racial purity test of the left. Basically saying, stop getting (fake)
distracted on what gender or race I am and listen to what I have to
say."
The debate came a day after a highly contentious vote to
impeach President Donald Trump, which showed in dramatic relief how
polarized the nation is over his presidency. With the
Republican-controlled Senate likely to acquit him, the stakes are high
for Democrats to select a challenger who can defeat Trump in November.
The
forum highlighted the choice Democrats will have to make between
progressive and moderate, older and younger, men and women and the
issues that will sway the small but critical segment of voters who will
determine the election. The candidates sharply disagreed about the role
of money in politics, the value and meaning of experience and the
direction of the American health care system The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Long-simmering tensions boiled over at Thursday night's 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate in Los Angeles, as a blunt one-on-one sparring match erupted between Pete Buttigieg and Elizabeth Warren over their fundraising -- just minutes after businessman Andrew Yang slammed Democrats' "obsession" with President Trump and impeachment.
Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts, began the fiery exchange by criticizing Buttigieg's recent lavish fundraiser
in Napa, Calif., saying he was cavorting with "billionaires in wine
caves" -- prompting Buttigieg to retort that Warren, a
multimillionaire, was a populist in name only.
"You know,
according to Forbes magazine, I'm literally the only person on this
stage who is not a millionaire or billionaire," Buttigieg, the mayor of
South Bend, Ind., said. "This is the problem with issuing purity tests
you yourself cannot pass." BIDEN SAYS 'YES' WHEN ASKED ABOUT SACRIFICING BLUE-COLLAR JOBS FOR CLEAN ENERGY
Democrats,
Buttigieg argued, are "in the fight" of their "lives," and need all the
support they can get -- whether from the wealthy or otherwise. He added
that he'd gladly accept a donation from Warren if she were to offer
one.
"We shouldn't try to [defeat Trump] with one hand tied behind our back," Buttigieg said.
Sen. Bernie Sanders,
I-Vt., then dismissively referred to Butitigeg as an "energetic guy,"
sarcastically saying he could "take on" former Vice President Joe Biden's
corporate connections as the two secretly courted big-money donors,
drawing jeers. Sanders noted that Biden has 44 billionaire contributors,
while Buttigieg was "trailing" with only 39.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota then interjected: "I did not come here to listen to this argument. ... I have never even been to a wine cave."
"I did not come here to listen to this argument. ... I have never even been to a wine cave." — Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.
She went on to say she wanted the Supreme Court's
Citizens United decision overturned by constitutional amendment. The
2010 decision declared unconstitutional the federal regulation of
campaign expenditures by corporations and unions in connection with
campaigns.
It was just one of several Klobuchar moments during the
debate that resonated in the debate hall at Loyola Marymount University
-- even as conservative commentators winced.
"The
'moderate' Klobuchar just advocated for a constitutional amendment that
would give government control over free political speech," the Wall
Street Journal's Kimberly Strassel wrote on Twitter. "This is
'moderation' in today's Democratic Party."
Separately, Klobuchar
unloaded on Buttigieg, after he remarked: "If you want to talk about the
capacity to win, try putting together a coalition to bring you back to
office with 80 percent of the vote as a gay dude in Mike Pence's Indiana."
Klobuchar
shot back: “If you had won in Indiana, that would be one thing. You
tried and you lost by 20 points.” That was an unsparing reference to
Buttigieg's failed bid to become Indiana state treasurer.
She
also remarked, "When we were in the last debate, mayor, you basically
mocked the 100 years of experience on the stage. ... You should respect
our experience."
The spat over fundraising erupted shortly
after Yang threw cold water on the media's "obsession" with impeachment,
saying Americans become frustrated "the more we act like Donald Trump
is the cause of all our problems."
Iowa caucuses near
It
was a heated beginning to a wide-ranging debate with less than seven
weeks to go until Iowa’s caucuses kick off, and just a day after House
Democrats voted to impeach Trump.
The winnowed field of seven Democratic presidential contenders was on
the debate stage for a sixth and final time in 2019.
"If you
turned on cable network news today, you would think [Trump's] our
president because of some combination of Russia, racism, Facebook,
Hillary Clinton and emails all mixed together," Yang said. "But
Americans around the country know different. We blasted away 4 million
manufacturing jobs that were primarily based in Ohio, Michigan,
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Missouri."
He added, to applause: "What
we have to do, is we have to stop being obsessed over impeachment ...
and start actually digging in and solving the problems that got Donald
Trump elected in the first place."
"What we have to
do, is we have to stop being obsessed over impeachment ... and start
actually digging in and solving the problems that got Donald Trump
elected in the first place." — Andrew Yang
(At
the end of the debate, Yang sounded a note of self-deprecation: "I know
what you're thinking, America. How am I still on the stage with them?")
But, other Democrats largely echoed their previous attacks on the president's dealings with Ukraine, and his assertions of executive privilege to block administration officials from testifying.
“The
president is not king in America,” said Klobuchar, who is preparing to
serve as a juror as Trump's impeachment shifts from the House to a
Senate trial. Alluding to President Richard Nixon, she added, "If the
president claims that he is so innocent, then why doesn't he have all
the president's men testify?" MCCONNELL HEADS BACK TO SENATE FLOOR LATE THURSDAY, SAYS DEMS BREAKING PRECEDENT, NOT SURE WHAT THEY'RE DOING
Klobuchar
went on to call Trump's actions a "global Watergate." Democrats'
inference that Trump is guilty because he does not voluntarily permit
his deputies to testify has rankled Republicans, who assert the importance of the presumption of innocence.
Biden then knocked Trump's argument that less than half of Americans support his removal from office.
“He's
dumbing down the presidency beyond what I even thought he would do,”
Biden said. “We need to restore the integrity of the presidency.”
Democratic presidential candidates from left, entrepreneur Andrew
Yang, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.,
former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Sen. Amy
Klobuchar, D-Minn., and businessman Tom Steyer stand on stage during a
Democratic presidential primary debate Thursday, Dec. 19, 2019, in Los
Angeles. (Associated Press)
Later, Democrats largely defended Trump's breakthrough U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which the House passed hours earlier.
However,
candidates railed against Trump's economy, despite multiple indicators
that the economy is doing well. The U.S. unemployment rate stands at a
half-century low of 3.5 percent, backed by consistently strong job gains
in recent months that have largely squelched fears of a recession that
had taken hold over the summer.
“This economy is not working for most of us," Buttigieg said.
"The middle class is getting killed,” Biden added. He said the economy was not "on kilter."
In response to a question as to whether he would commit to running for a second term if elected, amid a Politico report that
he has privately said he would retire after four years in the White
House, the 77-year-old Biden announced that he would not -- saying his
focus is on winning a first term.
When a moderator told the
70-year-old Warren she would be the oldest president ever elected upon
her inauguration, she retorted that she would also be the youngest woman
ever elected to the presidency, drawing applause.
Thursday night's televised contest, sponsored by PBS NewsHour and Politico, brought seven rivals to heavily Democratic California, the biggest prize in the primary season and home to 1 in 8 Americans.
Declining viewership
The
debate could turn out to be the least-watched so far, as the holidays
approach and impeachment drama dominates the news. Viewership has
declined in each round though five debates, and even campaigns have
grumbled that the candidates would rather be on the ground in early
voting states than again taking the debate stage.
Republicans have slammed
House Democrats' plan to delay a Senate trial. Hours before the debate,
Noah Feldman, the Harvard Law School professor who testified for
Democrats at the impeachment inquiry earlier this month, wrote an explosive op-ed asserting
that if Democrats do not forward the impeachment articles to the Senate
as dictated by the Constitution, then Trump was never even impeached at
all. The Constitution dictates that after impeachment by a majority in
the House, a two-thirds vote is needed in the Senate to remove a
president from office.
Asked why polls show
that many Americans oppose impeaching and removing Trump, Biden called
impeachment a "constitutional necessity," regardless of what the numbers
show.
Warren, for her part, accused Trump of corruption, without addressing the popularity of impeachment.
Klobuchar
also suggested that the U.S. would "probably" need to relocate
Americans away from places impacted by climate change, including
possibly Miami.
Yang, meanwhile, advanced the idea of using thorium to help address the nation's energy needs.
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.,
right, speaks as South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg listens during a
Democratic presidential primary debate Thursday, Dec. 19, 2019, in Los
Angeles. (Associated Press)
No clear front-runner
The
lack of a clear front-runner in the Democratic field came as Democrats
complained that there would be a notable lack of diversity onstage
Thursday as compared to earlier debates. For the first time this cycle,
the debate didn't feature a black or Latino candidate.
The race in
California has largely mirrored national trends, with Biden, Sanders
and Warren clustered at the top of the field, followed by Buttigieg,
Klobuchar, Yang and billionaire philanthropist Tom Steyer.
Conspicuously missing from Thursday's lineup was former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg,
a billionaire who is unable to qualify for the contests because he is
not accepting campaign donations. But even if he's not on the podium,
Bloomberg has been felt in the state: He's running a deluge of TV
advertising in California to introduce himself to voters who probably
know little, if anything, about him.
Bloomberg's late entry into
the contest last month highlighted the overriding issue in the contest
-- electability, a sign of the unease within the Democratic Party about
its crop of candidates and whether any is strong enough to unseat an
incumbent president. The eventual nominee will be tasked with splicing
together the party's disparate factions — a job Hillary Clinton struggled with after defeating Sanders in a long and bitter primary fight in 2016. DEBATE IS ON: DEAL REACHED IN UNION DISPUTE THAT THREATENED TO SIDETRACK SHOWDOWN
Biden adviser Symone Sanders said to expect another robust exchange on health care.
“This
is an issue that is not going away and for good reason, because it is
an issue that in 2018 Democrats ran on and won," she said.
Jess
O'Connell with Buttigieg's campaign said the candidate will “be fully
prepared to have an open and honest conversation about where there are
contrasts between us and the other candidates. This is a really
important time to start to do that. Voters need time to understand the
distinctions between these candidates.” The key issues: health care and higher education.
The
unsettled race has seen surges at various points by Biden, Warren,
Sanders and Buttigieg, though it's become defined by that cluster of
shifting leaders, with others struggling for momentum. Sen. Kamala
Harris of California, once seen as among the top tier of candidates,
shelved her campaign this month, citing a lack of money. And Warren has
become more aggressive, especially toward Buttigieg, as she tries to
recover from shifting explanations of how she’d pay for “Medicare for
All” without raising taxes.
In a replay of 2016, the shifting race
for the Democratic nomination has showcased the rift between the
party's liberal wing, represented by Sanders and Warren, and candidates
parked in or near the political center, including Biden, Buttigieg and
Bloomberg.
Two candidates who didn’t make the stage will still
make their presence felt for debate watchers with ads reminding viewers
they’re still in the race. APPELLATE COURT DEMANDS HOUSE DEMS EXPLAIN WHETHER IMPEACHMENT VOTE RENDERS THEIR LEGAL CASE 'MOOT'
Sen.
Cory Booker of New Jersey and former Housing Secretary Julián Castro
aired television ads targeted to primary voters during the debate.
Booker’s was his first television ad, and in it he said even though he
wasn't on the debate stage, “I’m going to win this election anyway.” It
aired as part of a $500,000 campaign, running in Iowa, New Hampshire,
Nevada and South Carolina, as well as New York, Washington, D.C., and
Los Angeles.
A pro-Booker super PAC is also going up with an ad in Iowa highlighting positive reviews of Booker’s past debate performances.
Meanwhile,
Castro is running an ad, in Iowa, in which he argues the state should
no longer go first in Democrats’ nominating process because it doesn’t
reflect the diversity of the Democratic Party.
Both candidates
failed to hit the polling threshold to qualify for the debates and have
in recent weeks become outspoken critics of what they say is a debate
qualification process that favors white candidates over minorities. Fox News' Paul Steinhauser and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell,
R-Ky., incredulously returned to the Senate floor late Thursday to
declare that the Senate and House Democrats were at an "impasse" over whether the House would transmit its articles of impeachment against President Trump to the GOP-controlled Senate for a constitutionally mandated trial.
McConnell,
speaking after a meeting with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer,
D-N.Y., said the top Democrat had insisted on "departing from
the unanimous bipartisan precedent that 100 senators approved before the
beginning of President [Bill] Clinton's trial" concerning logistics.
The
back-and-forth rhetoric comes as Noah Feldman, the Harvard Law School
professor who testified for Democrats at the impeachment inquiry earlier
this month, wrote an explosive op-ed
asserting that if Democrats do not forward the impeachment articles to
the Senate as dictated by the Constitution, then Trump was never even
impeached at all. The Constitution dictates that after impeachment by a
majority in the House, a two-thirds vote is needed in the Senate to
remove a president from office.
Feldman cautioned that impeachment
"means the House sending its approved articles of impeachment to the
Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the
president is impeached."
Therefore,
"if the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it
hasn’t actually impeached the president," Feldman said. "If the articles
are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly
impeached at all."
(Pursuant to House procedures,
a president impeached by the House in one Congress can be tried by a
Senate in the next Congress, but impeachment managers would need to be
re-appointed by the new House.)
Schumer had requested a "special
pre-trial guarantee of certain witnesses whom the House Democrats,
themselves, did not bother to pursue as they assemble their case,"
McConnell said. He noted that in 1999, "all 100 senators endorsed a
common-sense solution" to divide the process into two stages: one laying
the groundwork for rules on matters such as opening statements, with
another handling "mid-trial questions such as witnesses."
"Some
House Democrats imply they are withholding the [impeachment] articles
for some kind of leverage," McConnell said. "I admit, I'm not sure what
leverage there is in refraining from sending us something we do not
want. Alas, if they can figure that out, they can explain."
He
continued: "Following weeks of pronouncements about the urgency of the
situation, urgent situation, the prosecutors appear to have developed
cold feet. Democrat prosecution seems to gotten cold feet, and to be
unsure about whether they want to proceed to the trial, like I said, a
very unusual spectacle. And in my view, certainly not one that reflects
well on the House.
"So
we'll see we'll see whether House Democrats ever want to work up the
courage to actually take their accusation to trial," McConnell
concluded, after slamming Democrats for advancing a "muddled" message on
the topic. "Let me close with this, Mr. President. I am proud the
Senate came together today to confirm more well-qualified nominees and
pass major legislation for the American people."
For his part,
Trump called for an immediate Senate trial: "So after the Democrats gave
me no Due Process in the House, no lawyers, no witnesses, no nothing,
they now want to tell the Senate how to run their trial," he tweeted
late Thursday. "Actually, they have zero proof of anything, they will
never even show up. They want out. I want an immediate trial!"
Earlier in the day, McConnell delivered a separate address, which Schumer bashed as a "30-minute partisan stem-winder."
"This
particular House of Representatives has let its partisan rage at this
particular president create a toxic new precedent that will echo well
into the future,” McConnell said on the floor.
"Is the president’s
case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under
oath?" Schumer asked. "If the House’s case is so weak, why is Leader
McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?"
Late Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., floated the possibility that
the House would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate,
where McConnell likely would oversee a strong defense of the president
that could prove politically damaging for vulnerable Democrats.
"We’ll make a decision... as we go along." Pelosi told reporters, adding that "we'll see what the process will be on the Senate side."
On Thursday, Pelosi hastily shot down questions on impeachment and sending the articles to the Senate, prompting mockery from top GOP officials.
In 1998, after the impeachment of President Bill Clinton,
the House sent the charges off to the Senate within minutes. This time
around, the House may want to hold onto the articles as leverage to
extract concessions from Senate Republicans -- or to bury impeachment,
as it proves increasingly unpopular among moderates in key battleground states.