|
Former Clinton aide Pagliano a no-show at email hearing |
The former State Department IT specialist who set up Hillary
Clinton’s private server ignored a subpoena to appear Tuesday before a
House committee hearing, while other tech experts who helped maintain
the system asserted their Fifth Amendment right not to testify –
frustrating Republican lawmakers trying to dig deeper into the former
secretary of state’s email setup.
House oversight committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz,
R-Utah, said he’ll now consider a “full range of options” to address IT
aide Bryan Pagliano’s “failure” to attend.
“He should be here. … It is not optional,” Chaffetz said. “His attendance is required here.”
Pagliano is considered a vital witness in the Clinton
email case. He spoke previously to the FBI under immunity, telling the
bureau there were no successful security breaches of the server.
Pagliano also refused to answer questions last year before a House panel
investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. His lawyers
said at the time that Pagliano did not want to relinquish his rights
under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment against
self-incrimination.
Republicans on Tuesday questioned why Pagliano would
avoid the latest hearing if he had immunity, though Democrats pushed
back. According to Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., Pagliano’s lawyer said
the request was an “abuse of process.”
Two other officials from Platte River Networks, Bill
Thornton and Paul Combetta, did comply with subpoenas to appear.
However, when it came time to answer questions, they pleaded the Fifth.
The Denver-based technology company maintained Clinton’s server when it
was moved from her Chappaqua, New York, home to a data center in
northern New Jersey.
Combetta took the Fifth six times and Thornton took the Fifth four times, before both witnesses were excused.
After each question, they recited a variation of the
line: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer and
assert my Fifth Amendment constitutional privilege.”
Cummings said he could “understand” why they were not addressing questions.
But Chaffetz voiced frustration when Thornton
declined to even answer whether he’d been questioned by the FBI. GOP
lawmakers have wanted to question tech officials on the deletion of
email records and other alleged attempts to destroy devices.
Chaffetz also said there will be consequences for
Pagliano's refusal to appear and for "thumbing his nose at Congress." He
didn't specify what the penalties would be but said, "We're not letting
go of this."
A letter from Pagliano's attorney released by the
committee says Pagliano will continue to assert his constitutional right
not to testify.
The only witness remaining after the unfruitful
initial questioning was Bill Clinton aide Justin Cooper, who answered
lawmakers’ questions.
During that process, he confirmed that he had access to the Clinton server but did not hold a security clearance.
The email issue has shadowed Clinton's candidacy, and
Republicans have been steadfast in focusing on her use of a private
server for government business, with several high-profile hearings
leading up to the election. Democrats insist the sole purpose of the
hearings is to undermine Clinton's bid for the presidency.
Chaffetz on Monday escalated the GOP's battle with
the FBI after its decision in July not to recommend criminal charges
against Clinton for her use of the private email system by serving a top
FBI official with a subpoena for the full case file. Chaffetz and other
Republicans on the panel said the bureau has withheld summaries of
interviews with witnesses and unnecessarily blacked out material from
documents sent last month.
“We are entitled to the full file," he said.
Dismissing the "emergency" hearing held late on a
Monday, Cummings said: "As far as I can tell, the only `emergency' is
that the election is less than two months away."
Chaffetz issued the subpoena to Jason Herring, the
acting assistant FBI director for congressional affairs. Herring and six
other Obama administration officials appeared before the committee to
discuss the investigative files. The witnesses on several occasions said
they could not answer the questions from lawmakers in an open forum.