 |
| Another Snake In The Grass? Comey sparks debate over integrity of Clinton probe |
The decision to let Hillary Clinton off the hook for mishandling
classified information has roiled the FBI and Department of Justice,
with one person closely involved in the year-long probe telling
FoxNews.com that career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously
believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged.
The source, who spoke to FoxNews.com on the condition
of anonymity, said FBI Director James Comey’s dramatic July 5
announcement that he would not recommend to the Attorney General’s
office that the former secretary of state be charged left members of the
investigative team dismayed and disgusted. More than 100 FBI agents and
analysts worked around the clock with six attorneys from the DOJ’s
National Security Division, Counter Espionage Section, to investigate
the case.
“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the
case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down
decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been
verified by FoxNews.com.
A high-ranking FBI official told Fox News that while
it might not have been a unanimous decision, “It was unanimous that we
all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.”
“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should
be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored
while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and
then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”
The FBI declined to comment directly, but instead
referred Fox News to multiple public statements Comey has made in which
he has thrown water on the idea that politics played a role in the
agency’s decision not to recommend charges.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections.
See Predictions Map →
“I know there were many opinions expressed by people
who were not part of the investigation – including people in government –
but none of that mattered to us,” Comey said July 5 in announcing the
FBI’s decision on the Clinton emails. “Opinions are irrelevant, and they
were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did
the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found
them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way."
Andrew Napolitano, former judge and senior judicial
analyst for Fox News Channel, said many law enforcement agents involved
with the Clinton email investigation have similar beliefs.
“It is well known that the FBI agents on the ground,
the human beings who did the investigative work, had built an extremely
strong case against Hillary Clinton and were furious when the case did
not move forward,” said Napolitano. “They believe the decision not to
prosecute came from The White House.”
The claim also is backed up by a report in the New
York Post this week, which quotes a number of veteran FBI agents saying
FBI Director James Comey “has permanently damaged the bureau’s
reputation for uncompromising investigations with his cowardly whitewash
of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of
classified information using an unauthorized private email server.”
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation
will suffer for a long time. I hold Director Comey responsible,” Dennis
V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit,
told the Post. Retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello added to the
report, saying, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the
organization.”
Especially angering the team, which painstakingly
pieced together deleted emails and interviewed witnesses to prove that
sensitive information was left unprotected, was the fact that Comey
based his decision on a conclusion that a recommendation to charge would
not be followed by DOJ prosecutors, even though the bureau’s role was
merely to advise, Fox News was told.
“Basically, James Comey hijacked the DOJ’s role by
saying ‘no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case,’” the Fox News
source said. “The FBI does not decide who to prosecute and when, that is
the sole province of a prosecutor -- that never happens.
“I know zero prosecutors in the DOJ’s National
Security Division who would not have taken the case to a grand jury,”
the source added. “One was never even convened.”
Napolitano agreed, saying the FBI investigation was
hampered from the beginning, because there was no grand jury, and no
search warrants or subpoenas issued.
“The FBI could not seize anything related to the
investigation, only request things. As an example, in order to get the
laptop, they had to agree to grant immunity,” Napolitano said.
In early 2015, it was revealed that Clinton had used a
private email server in her Chappaqua, N.Y., home to conduct government
business while serving from 2009-2013. The emails on the private server
included thousands of messages that would later be marked classified by
the State Department retroactively. Federal law makes it a crime for a
government employee to possess classified information in an unsecure
manner, and the relevant statute does not require a finding of intent.
Although Comey found that Clinton was “extremely
careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified
information,” he said “no charges are appropriate in this case.”
Well before Comey’s announcement, which came days
after Bill Clinton met in secret with Comey’s boss, Attorney General
Loretta Lynch, there were signs the investigation would go nowhere, the
source told FoxNews.com. One was the fact that the FBI forced its agents
and analysts involved in the case to sign non-disclosure agreements.
“This is unheard of, because of the stifling nature it has on the investigative process,” the source said.
Another oddity was the five so-called immunity agreements granted to Clinton’s State Department aides and IT experts.
Cheryl Mills, Clinton's former chief of staff, along
with two other State Department staffers, John Bentel and Heather
Samuelson, were afforded immunity agreements, as was Bryan Pagliano,
Clinton's former IT aide, and Paul Combetta, an employee at Platte River
networks, the firm hired to manage her server after she left the State
Department.
As Fox News has reported, Combetta utilized the
computer program “Bleachbit” to destroy Clinton’s records, despite an
order from Congress to preserve them, and Samuelson also destroyed
Clinton’s emails. Pagliano established the system that illegally
transferred classified and top secret information to Clinton’s private
server. Mills disclosed classified information to the Clinton’s family
foundation in the process, breaking federal laws.
None should have been granted immunity if no charges were being brought, the source said.
“[Immunity] is issued because you know someone
possesses evidence you need to charge the target, and you almost always
know what it is they possess,” the source said. “That's why you give
immunity.”
Mills and Samuelson also received immunity for what
was found on their computers, which were then destroyed as a part of
negotiations with the FBI.
“Mills and Samuelson receiving immunity with the
agreement their laptops would be destroyed by the FBI afterwards is, in
itself, illegal,” the source said. “We know those laptops contained
classified information. That's also illegal, and they got a pass.”
Mills’ dual role as Clinton’s attorney and a witness in her own right should never have been tolerated either.
“Mills was allowed to sit in on the interview of
Clinton as her lawyer. That's absurd. Someone who is supposedly
cooperating against the target of an investigation [being] permitted to
sit by the target as counsel violates any semblance of ethical
responsibility,” the source said.
“Every agent and attorney I have spoken to is
embarrassed and has lost total respect for James Comey and Loretta
Lynch,” the source said. “The bar for DOJ is whether the evidence
supports a case for charges -- it did here. It should have been taken to
the grand jury.”
Also infuriating agents, the New York Post reported,
was the fact that Clinton’s interview spanned just 3½ hours with no
follow-up questioning, despite her “40 bouts of amnesia,” and then,
three days later, Comey cleared her of criminal wrongdoing.
Many FBI and DOJ staffers believe Comey and Lynch were motivated by ambition, and not justice, the source said.
“Loretta Lynch simply wants to stay on as Attorney
General under Clinton, so there is no way she would indict,” the source
said. “James Comey thought his position [excoriating Clinton even as he
let her off the hook] gave himself cover to remain on as director
regardless of who wins.”
The decision by Comey and Lynch not to prosecute has renewed FBI agents’ belief that the agency should be autonomous.
“This is why so many agents believe the FBI needs to
be an entity by itself to truly be effective,” the senior FBI official
told Fox News. “We all feel very strongly about it -- and the need to be
objective. But that truly cannot be done when the AG is appointed by a
president and attends daily briefings.”
Adding to the controversy, WikiLeaks released
internal Clinton communication records this week that show the
Department of Justice kept Clinton’s campaign and her staff informed
about the progress of its investigation.
Leaked emails from Clinton campaign chairman John
Podesta’s gmail account show the Clinton campaign was contacted by the
DOJ on May 19, 2015.
“DOJ folks inform me there is a status hearing in
this case this morning, so we could have a window into the judge’s
thinking about this proposed production schedule as quickly as today,”
Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon wrote in relation to the email
documentation the State Department would be required to turn over to the
Justice Department.
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center
for Law and Justice, who previously served in the U.S. Treasury
Department in the Office of Chief Counsel for the IRS, where he was
responsible for litigation in the U.S. Tax Court, said it was clear from
the start that the FBI never intended to prosecute.
“This was a fake, false investigation from the outset,” Sekulow said.
