Back when gas topped $4 a gallon, Republicans chanted "drill, baby,
drill' at rallies across the country -- arguing more domestic drilling
would increase supplies, reduce dependence on foreign oil and boost the
U.S. economy.
Democrats, almost universally, mocked the GOP plan. In 2012,
President Obama called it "a slogan, a gimmick, and a bumper sticker ...
not a strategy."
"They were waving their three-point plans for $2-a-gallon gas," Obama
told a laughing audience during an energy speech in Washington. "You
remember that? Drill, baby, drill. We were going through all that. And
none of it was really going to do anything to solve the problem."
"'Drill, baby, drill' won't lower gas prices today or tomorrow," Rep.
Janice Hahn, D-Calif., echoed on the floor of Congress in 2012. "But it
will fuel our addiction to fossil fuel."
Today, Democrats are singing a different tune, as increased domestic
drilling has led to a record supply of domestic crude, put some $100
billion into the pockets of U.S. consumers and sent world oil prices
tumbling.
The price of a gallon of regular gasoline on Monday was $2.13 nationwide, and below $2 in 18 states.
"Of course [Obama] was wrong. We've seen oil prices fall
internationally now by half since last June," said American Enterprise
Institute economist Ben Zycher. "The U.S. is now the biggest oil and gas
producer in the world, or almost that, and the effect has been to drive
prices down as we've seen."
Most of the domestic increase is due to "fracking" for tight oil in
shale deposits across the U.S., as well as advances in directional
drilling, where numerous pipelines diverge from a single platform in
numerous directions, for a large cost savings.
But the gains, according to oil experts, come off private, not federal, lands.
Oil production on federal lands -- those under the president's
control -- fell 6 percent since 2009, according to the federal Energy
Information Administration, while production on private lands increased
61 percent.
Nevertheless, Obama is touting the lower prices, which injected billions into the improving U.S. economy.
"America is the number one producer of oil, number one producer of
gas. It's helping to save drivers $1.10 a gallon at the pump over this
time last year," the president told a crowd last week in Detroit.
Zycher, a former UCLA economist who also served on President Reagan's
President's Council of Economic Advisers, called it "rather
disingenuous for the president to take credit for the decline in oil
prices and gasoline prices and the increase in incomes generated by
increasing production."
He added: "It's somewhat amusing. He's taking credit for an increase
in production that has happened largely on private land and had nothing
to do with federal government policies."
No matter who pays for Chris Christie’s ticket to today’s Dallas
Cowboys vs. Green Bay Packers football game, the New Jersey governor
will be running up the score on taxpayers.
The travel costs of state police troopers assigned to protect the
governor are 18 times higher than when Christie took office, a New Jersey Watchdog investigation found.
New Jersey spent nearly $1 million on travel expenses for its state
police Executive Protection Unit during Christie’s four years and nine
months as governor, according to documents obtained under the Open
Public Records Act. Last year, Christie traveled out-of-state on more
than 100 days while visiting 36 states, Mexico and Canada, primarily on
personal and political trips that were not official state business.
The current average monthly travel costs to protect Christie for a
single month are 50 percent more than former Gov. Jon Corzine’s entire
final year in office, according to state records. For 2009, EPU’s
expenses were only $21,704 – compared to $32,933 per month for the first
three quarters of 2014.
Spokesmen for Christie did not respond to New Jersey Watchdog’s requests for comment.
The governor announced Friday he will pay for his own travel and ticket to today’s game in Green Bay. Last week, Christie acknowledged Cowboys owner Jerry Jones paid for him, his wife and their four children
to fly to Dallas on a private charter jet plus their VIP seats at the
Jan. 4 game against the Detroit Lions – an admission that stirred
controversy about ethics and gifts to the governor.
The Senate still needs four votes to pass veto-proof legislation to
build the Keystone XL oil pipeline, Sen. John Hoeven, who sponsored the
legislation, said Sunday.
Hoeven, R-N.D., told “Fox News Sunday” the GOP-controlled Senate
remains shy of the 67 votes needed to override a presidential veto.
All of the chamber's 54 Republicans and nine Democrats are expected
to support the legislation, which needs a two-thirds majority to
override a veto.
“But we're going to the floor with an open amendment process, trying to foster more bipartisanship,” Hoeven said.
He also suggested Senate Republicans might attach the bill to other legislation that would get 67 votes.
The upper chamber could hold a preliminary vote on the legislation as early as Monday.
The Obama administration early last week repeated that President
Obama intends to veto the legislation should it reach his desk before a
State Department study on the issue is completed.
Hoeven suggested that Obama has stalled the project since shortly
after taking office in 2009, through repeated State Department studies.
“He’s delayed this project for more than six years. America won World
War II in less than six years, so clearly he’s trying to defeat the
project with endless delays,” he told Fox.
The GOP-led House last week passed legislation to build the pipeline.
The administration also objects to the legislation because it takes the decision about Keystone away from the executive branch.
One of the administration’s other principal arguments for not
approving completion of the pipeline, which would carry crude Canadian
oil through the heartland to Gulf Coast refiners, was resolved Friday.
The Nebraska Supreme Court cleared the way for the pipeline to be built in that state.
Both sides have argued about whether the pipeline would indeed be a
jobs creator. Supporters refer to a State Department report stating it
would create roughly 42,000 jobs, while critics argue many of those jobs
will be temporary.
Until a few days ago, a war memorial in a public park in North
Carolina included a metal sculpture depicting a soldier kneeling in
prayer before a cross. But city officials voted to remove the sculpture
to settle a lawsuit claiming the artwork promoted Christianity.
King, a small city of about 6,000 people 15 miles north of
Winston-Salem, dedicated the memorial about a decade ago. But the statue
was removed Tuesday night, immediately after The King city council
voted 3-2 to end the lawsuit. Now, an empty hole can be seen where the
statue once stood.
MyFox8
in Winston-Salem, reporting on the controversy the other day, said the
memorial is on city-owned land but was paid for through private
donations.
“Both sides in this matter wish to avoid further costs, and this
agreement will ensure that the City of King will not spend additional
taxpayers’ funds to continue litigation in federal court,” the city said
in a statement after the vote.
As part of the agreement, the King City Council also said it would
stop flying the Christian flag over the memorial and would pay $500,000
to Americans United for Separation of Church and State for the legal
costs the group incurred bringing the lawsuit on behalf of local
Afghanistan War veteran Steven Hewett.
Hewett explained his reasons for suing in November, the Christian News Network reported Saturday. His lawsuit claimed violations of his constitutional rights.
“I proudly served alongside a diverse group of soldiers with a
variety of different religious beliefs,” he said in a news release. “The
City of King should be honoring everyone who served our country, not
using their service as an excuse to promote a single religion.”
The settlement calls for Hewett to be paid $1 in nominal damages.
The Stokes News
reported that King’s elected officials were worried about losing the
lawsuit and facing higher legal bills, as much as $2 million by one
estimate. The city’s insurer also was insisting on a settlement.
“I feel this city has been sabotaged and bullied by folks who don’t
believe in what this community stands for,” the newspaper quoted City
Councilman Wesley Carter as saying when he voted against the settlement.
“I feel like we have been pressured by insurance companies and
attorneys who have never been to King. They don’t know what we are about
and what this community stands for.”
King’s elected officials incensed veterans groups, churches and
others in the city in 2010 when they ordered the removal of the
Christian flag from the memorial. As part of a protest, the Christian
flag started flying everywhere else in the town, including barbecue
joints and hair salons. Eventually the city passed a law establishing a
lottery system in which citizens could choose what flag they wanted
flown over the memorial, including the Christian flag.
City officials say they will now draw up plans for a new kneeling
soldier sculpture that does not include a cross, and will ask residents
for their input.
Secretary of State John Kerry called criticism that no top U.S.
officials attended Sunday's massive march against terrorism in Paris
"quibbling" Monday, even as he announced a trip to the French capital
later this week for talks on countering Islamist violence.
Kerry announced his plans at a press conference in the Indian city of
Ahmedabad, where he had made a long-scheduled appearance at an
international investment conference Sunday ahead of President Barack
Obama's planned visit to that country later this month.
"I would have personally very much wanted to have been [in Paris],"
Kerry said, "but couldn't do so because of the commitment that I had
here and it is important to keep these kinds of commitments."
When asked about criticism directed at the Obama administration for
not sending a high-ranking official to take part in the march, Kerry
said, "I really think that this is sort of quibbling a little bit in the
sense that our Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was there
and marched, our ambassador [to France Jane Hartley] was there and
marched, many people from the embassy were there and marched."
Nuland, in fact, attended a march in Washington.
Kerry also said at a news conference that U.S. officials, including
himself and President Barack Obama, had been "deeply engaged" with
French authorities almost immediately after the first attack occurred
Wednesday and had offered intelligence assistance.
More than 40 world leaders, along with more than a million ordinary
French citizens, marched arm in arm through the streets of Paris Sunday
to rally for unity and freedom of expression and to honor the 17 victims
killed in three separate terror attacks last week.
Among the world leaders who did march, under heavy security, were
French President Francois Hollande, British Prime Minister David
Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Attorney
General Eric Holder did not take part, despite being in Paris for
meetings on counterterrorism.
Kerry said he is going to France to reaffirm U.S. solidarity with
America's oldest ally. He said as soon as he heard about the march, he
asked his team what the earliest time was that he could go.
"That is why I am going there on the way home and to make it crystal
clear how passionately we feel about the events that have taken place
there," he said. "I don't think he people of France have any doubt about
America's understanding about what happened, about our personal sense
of loss and our deep commitment to the people of France in this moment
of trial."
Kerry will arrive in Paris on Thursday after stops in Sofia, Bulgaria
and Geneva, Switzerland. In Geneva, on Wednesday Kerry will he meeting
with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif to discuss the status
of nuclear negotiations that are to resume the following day.
Kerry will be the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit France since
the terrorist attacks on a French newspaper and a kosher supermarket.
Authorities say one of those involved in the attacks pledged allegiance
to the Islamic State group in a video. He and two other suspected
extremists were killed during police raids.
"I want to emphasize that the relationship with France is not about
one day or one particular moment," Kerry said. "It is an ongoing
longtime relationship that is deeply, deeply based in the shared values,
and particularly the commitment that we share to freedom of
expression."
"No single act of terror, no two people with a AK-47s, no
hostage-taking at a grocery store is ever going to prevent those who are
committed to the march for freedom to continue to march and to
ultimately see all people enjoy their rights, to be able to enjoy the
protections that come with that freedom," he added.
Falling gasoline prices have sparked congressional debate about
increasing the federal gas tax to help fund upcoming infrastructure
projects and have set up a potential disagreement among House and Senate
Republicans.
The federal gas tax primarily pays for transportation projects but
has stayed at 18.4 cents a gallon for roughly two decades, helping
create the funding gap.
In addition, increasing construction costs combined with less revenue
from the gas tax, in large part because of more fuel-efficient
vehicles, have further contributed to the estimated $16 billion funding
gap over the past several years.
Though Congress has managed to find money elsewhere in the federal
budget to cover the shortages, lawmakers say the country needs more than
a stop-gap solution.
However, House Speaker John Boehner suggested Thursday that getting a
gas-tax increase passed in the now-Republican-controlled House and
Senate seems unlikely.
“When the Democrats had total control of the Congress they couldn't
find the votes,” he told reporters. “It's doubtful the votes are here to
raise the gas tax again. … I’ve never voted to raise the gas tax. We'll
have to work our way through it.”
But at least four Senate Republicans -- Bob Corker, Tenn.; James
Inhofe, Okla.; Orrin Hatch, Utah; and John Thune, S.D. -- appear open to
the idea of increasing the tax.
Last week, Thune, the third-ranking Senate Republican, told “Fox News
Sunday” that he didn’t “favor increasing any tax, but I think we have
to look at all of the option.”
Gas prices are now $2.50 a gallon, which some economic experts argue
now gives Americans enough money to absorb such a tax increase.
The federal highway bill expires at the end of May. And there is a
roughly $100 billion shortfall on funding the agency’s Highway Trust
Fund at its current levels.
Inhofe, chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works, has suggested lawmakers have little choice but to at least
consider an increase, in light of the state of the fund and the
country’s crumbling roads and bridges.
Corker, who is backing a proposal for a 12-cent-a-gallon increase in
the gas tax over the next two years, says such a hike would be offset by
other taxes that Americans now pay.
“At least it would put our infrastructure on strong footing,” he
said. “And that second component seems to get left out of the
conversation most of the time. But, yes, I believe that's what we should
do.”
Democrats including Sen. Barbara Boxer and House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi, both of California, have urged Congress to increase the
tax or find other ways to better fund infrastructure projects.
“If there's ever going to be a time to raise the gas tax, the time
when gas is so low is the time to do it,” Pelosi said last week.
DES MOINES, Iowa – Yet another city is
pulling kids from city-owned sledding hills and slapping hefty fines on
anyone trying to use the public property, but it might be more for fear
of lawsuits than for kids' safety.
The City Council in Dubuque, Iowa, voted Jan. 7 to ban sledding in 48
of its 50 public parks. The new ordinance, which council members
acknowledged was put in place to protect the city from expensive
lawsuits, provides for $750 fines for repeat offenses.
According to council members during the Monday night meeting and an
editorial in U.S. News and World Report by Dubuque Mayor Roy Buol,
sledding injury lawsuits are real concern for the city. A lawsuit in
Boone, Iowa, cost that city $12 million after a woman hit a concrete
block on public property and claimed negligence on the part of the city.
And in Omaha, Neb., a sledding collision with a tree paralyzed a young
girl and cost the city $2 million. Still another case, in Sioux City,
Iowa, saw a man win a $2.75 million settlement after he struck a city
sign and sued.
Buol said the city did not want to restrict sledding, but was forced
to because state lawmakers have not moved on legislation that would
protect cities from what he called frivolous lawsuits. In Iowa, someone
cannot sue a city if they are injured while doing activities like biking
on public property. But sledding is not covered under that law and
leaves cities open to lawsuits.
In his editorial in U.S News and World report, Buol wrote, “Our legal
counsel advises us we limit our liability for negligence, which is the
failure to exercise reasonable care to maintain a park safe for
sledding…Safe sledding areas require inspections, ongoing evaluation and
maintenance throughout the season, and we do not have the resources to
do that for our other 47 parks.”
According a report that looked at sledding injuries from 2000-2007 by
the Center for Injury Research and Policy at Nationwide Children’s
Hospital, 20,000 children are injured in sledding incidents each year.
These could be injuries from minor scraps, to broken bones and more
serious injuries.
In a counter editorial piece in U.S. News and World Report to Buol’s,
Nicole Kaeding of the Cato Institute says kids should be allowed to be
kids, which includes getting bumps and bruises.
“The quest for safety doesn’t mean that we eliminate all the fun in
childhood. Kids should be kids. As parents, we should teach our children
to look, understand, listen and access their surroundings,” wrote
Kaeding, adding, “Banning sledding is just another absurd item fostered
by overzealous safety experts.”
Cities all over the country are banning sledding on public property.
And others, like Des Moines, are trying to avoid all-out bans by posting
signs that warn sledders of the risk. However, it doesn’t completely
get cities legally off the hook.
The Mayor and City Council said that if anyone has a problem with the
new ordinance they should direct their frustration towards their
state-elected officials in the capital. Who they say, can enact laws
that would cut down on the lawsuits. The Mayor also wrote in his
editorial that if more funding becomes available, they can ensure safety
at more parks and open more hills for sledding.
Helping America's poor, aged and sick is the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services' reason for being, but hundreds of its top
officials are traveling in style and luxury at taxpayer expense.
Records obtained by the Washington Examiner under the
Freedom of Information Act show that HHS executives spent $31 million
taking 7,000 first class and business class flights between 2009 and
2013, including 253 trips for which a one-way ticket cost more than
$15,000.
Half the records listed the price of a coach ticket for comparison.
For that portion alone, the upgrade boosted the cost by almost $14
million, from $4.9 million to $18.5 million.
Federal employees are allowed to fly business or first class if the
flight is longer than 14 hours, but only 1,400 of the 7,000 flights met
that description.