Insurgent Dem threatens to upset Pelosi ally in Md. Senate battle

Maryland Rep. Chris Van Hollen, a big ally of Nancy Pelosi and other top Washington Democrats, was expected to have a clear path to the state’s open Senate seat. But fellow Maryland congressman Donna Edwards and her insurgent campaign is poised for an upset victory -- in a contest often being defined by race and gender politics.
As part of House Democratic leadership, and with enough name recognition to raise millions, Van Hollen was almost a sure thing when Elijah Cummings, another Maryland Democratic congressman, and a presumptive frontrunner, decided in February not to run.
However, the under-funded and lesser-known Edwards has run a resilient campaign, with a message of economic hope and prosperity for the work-class that is resonating with women and black voters.
“She is out of the populist wing,” says Nathan Gonzales of the non-partisan Rothenberg and Gonzales Political Report. “There’s some real value now in delivering that message in a primary. There’s a similar divide in the presidential primaries. Look at Bernie Sanders. … Being part of the establishment and leadership is no longer what it once was for voters.”
An NBC News/Maryland Marist poll released Wednesday shows Van Hollen with a 44-to-38 percent lead over Edwards, a black, single mother whose former struggles to afford health insurance has become part of her campaign.
The poll follows one released in late-February by The Washington Post that showed Van Hollen leading by just 4 percentage points and one by The Baltimore Sun in mid-March that showed him trailing Edwards by as many as 10 points.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

The Post poll also showed Edwards leading Van Hollen among likely female voters, now the biggest voting bloc in recent presidential election years, and black voters, who make up two-thirds of registered Maryland Democrats.
State Sen. Delores Goodwin Kelley, a Baltimore County Democrat, said Wednesday that the contest being thrust into the framework of race and gender politics is “kind of sad,” considering it’s more about voter demographics.
Nevertheless, Kelley, a black female, is voting for Van Hollen.
“If you really want to get the job done, you have to pick the best person,” said Kelley, who served roughly 12 years in the state legislature with Van Hollen. “When one person is clearly more knowledgeable, works better with others, is willing to do the heavy lifting, now is not the time to make an historic statement.”
As proof of Van Hollen’s fundraising prowess, he reported on Friday raising $1.8 million in the first three months of this year.
To keep pace, Edwards has gotten some huge help from EMILY’s List, the liberal group dedicated to getting pro-choice women elected to office. A PAC supporting the group has reportedly spent roughly $2.4 million so far on the Edwards campaign.
The winner of the April 26 primary will in November likely take the seat of retiring Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski, considering 56 percent of registered Maryland voters are Democrats, more than double the number of registered Republicans.
Early primary voting started this week.
Edwards certainly has a natural advantage, considering her Prince George’s County-centric congressional district has a large black population, compared to Van Hollen’s Montgomery County-based district, also in suburban Washington, which is made up of more white and affluent voters.
However, the race could potentially be decided by who performs best in Baltimore City.
Edwards has at times been criticized for being difficult in Congress, across the aisle and compared to Van Hollen, a member of House Minority Leader Pelosi’s leadership team and the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee.
“She’s such a purist about who she will talk to and work with that it’s almost paralyzing,” Kelley said.
Edwards campaign spokesman Ben Gerdes said this week that his candidate “doesn’t shy away” from being who she is, which includes a being a single parent and black female lawmaker.
“Who she is has shaped the type of legislation she supports,” Gerdes said. He also said Edward’s closing strategy will be the same as what got her to the threshold of a potential upset victory.
“People care about the same things -- good jobs, good schools, getting rid of the heroin epidemic,” Gerdes said.
Key issues like Social Security and more recently gun control have helped define the race, in which the two progressive candidates are ideologically close.
Edwards has tried to suggest Van Hollen would cut Social Security to reduce the federal deficit. But Pelosi and others have defended him as a strong supporter of entitlements for the poor and elderly, and for ObamaCare.
Edwards and supporters are also now using ads to try to tie Van Hollen to the National Rifle Association because he led efforts on a 2010 bill to create more transparency in campaign finance reporting that included exemptions -- or “carve outs” -- for the NRA, in an apparent attempt to garner more support.
Van Hollen has fought back by arguing that Cummings and President Obama supported the legislation, which failed in the Senate, and points to his long political career of being tough on guns.
"We're confident that Chris's proven track record of getting results and vision for the future are what Marylanders want in their next U.S. senator,” Van Hollen spokeswoman Bridgett Frey said Friday. “Congresswoman Edwards has focused her campaign on false and misleading attacks because she's trying to hide her record of ineffectiveness. But Maryland families want a progressive leader who turns values into action.”

Report: Saudis vow to sell US assets if Congress decides gov was involved in 9/11

Saudis Blackmailing American Government?

Saudi Arabia has reportedly told the Obama administration and congressional leaders that it will sell billions of dollars in U.S. financial assets if Congress passes a bill to make the Saudi government legally responsible for any role in the 9/11 attacks.
The administration has tried to stop Congress from passing the legislation, a bipartisan Senate bill, since Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir last month told Washington lawmakers his country’s position, according to The New York Times.
Al-Jubeir purportedly informed the lawmakers during a trip to Washington that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell as much as $750 billion in Treasury securities and other American financial assets on the world market, fearing the legislation could become law and U.S. courts would then freeze the assets.
The revelations about the Saudis’ ultimatum come several days after reports that President Obama will soon decide whether to declassify 28 pages of sealed documents suspected of showing a Saudi connection to the deadly 9/11 terror attacks.
Former Florida Democratic Sen. Bob Graham told Fox News on Tuesday that the White House told him a decision on whether to declassify the documents would be made within 60 days.
Graham helped lead a 2002 congressional inquiry into the attacks.
The Bush and Obama administrations have refused to unseal the documents, arguing their release would jeopardize national security.
Critics claim the reluctance is a calculated move to hide Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the al Qaeda terror attack that killed almost 3,000 people on U.S. soil on Sept. 11, 2001.
Obama had come under renewed pressure to release the documents ahead of a scheduled trip next week to Saudi Arabia for a summit of Persian Gulf leaders.
Economists are purportedly skeptical about the Saudis making good on their vow to sell the assets, considering such a move would be difficult to execute and could severely hurt that country’s economy, which depends on the U.S. dollar.
The separate 9/11 Commission essentially found no evidence that the Saudi Arabia government supported the attacks.
However, the commission’s narrowly worded finding about having “no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization” has skeptic suggesting that lesser officials government operatives or were involved.

Battle over Obama immigration actions lands before Supreme Court

Illegal immigrants forcing Americans to accept them.

The impassioned election-year debate over President Obama’s immigration executive actions lands Monday before a short-handed Supreme Court, where justices will consider a fundamental question: how much power does the president truly have?
The justices plan to hold 90 minutes of oral arguments dealing with Obama’s bid to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation.
A coalition of states calls it an executive power grab. "President Obama's executive action is an affront to our system of republican self-government," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who supports those states.
But the White House contends the president’s authority is clear, and the policies humane and reasonable. Obama has promoted his program as a plan to "prioritize deporting felons not families."
It’s a case that will be closely watched in an election season where Republican front-runner Donald Trump has made immigration enforcement a centerpiece of his campaign. The outcome also could have considerable bearing on Obama’s legacy, potentially determining whether his lame-duck bid to go around Congress is upheld or ruled an overreach.
At issue Monday is whether as many as 5 million illegal immigrants can be spared deportation -- including those who entered the U.S. as children, and the parents of citizens or legal residents. The programs -- known as Deferred Action for Parents of American Citizens and Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) -- effectively went around the Republican-led Congress.
Opponents, including 26 states and GOP members of Congress, say the plan exceeds constitutional power.
A federal appeals court earlier had struck down DAPA, which has yet to go fully into effect. The Justice Department then asked the high court for a final review, in what could be a key test of Obama's executive powers his last year in office.
The decision to review the case was welcome on both sides of the aisle.
"The Constitution vests legislative authority in Congress, not the president,” said Hatch, urging the justices to rule against the administration.
But the White House voiced confidence the policies would be upheld.

U.S. Immigration Statistics | InsideGov

"Like millions of families across this country -- immigrants who want to be held accountable, to work on the books, to pay taxes, and to contribute to our society openly and honestly -- we are pleased that the Supreme Court has decided to review the immigration case," spokeswoman Brandi Hoffine said.
The issue of illegal immigration has taken a center-stage role in the Republican primary battle, as Trump calls for a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico and candidates spar over who is toughest on the issue.
The immigrants who would benefit from the Obama administration's plan are mainly parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. said in a court filing that allowing the past rulings to stand would force millions "to continue to work off the books.”
Besides immigration, Obama has used his unilateral authority to act on such hot-button issues as gun control, health care and global warming.
However, as with other high-profile Supreme Court appeals this term -- on ObamaCare, abortion rights and affirmative action -- the outcome here likely will be affected by death in February of Justice Antonin Scalia, which left a 4-4 bench split along conservative-liberal lines.
A 4-4 ruling would effectively scuttle the issue until after Obama leaves office in nine months, and mean at least a temporary setback to his domestic policy legacy -- even if the justices punt, and choose to reargue the case when Scalia's replacement is sworn in. The justices also could rule narrowly on procedure, finding a compromise on a technical issue not directly related to the larger policy questions.
On the legal side, the GOP-controlled House filed an amicus brief supporting the states, telling the high court, "the Executive does not have the power to authorize -- let alone facilitate -- the prospective violation of the immigration laws on a massive class-wide scale."
Supporters of the administration vow this issue will resonate in an election year.
"There are millions of families of U.S.-born citizens that live under the fear of separation and deportation," said Ben Monterroso, executive director of Mi Familia Vota, an Hispanic advocacy nonprofit. "Our community is watching and will hold accountable those who have stood on the way of our families through the ballots in November."
MFV and other immigrant rights advocates plan to march at the Supreme Court around Monday's arguments.
The case is U.S. v. Texas (15-674). A ruling is expected by late June.
 

Cruz takes all 14 delegates at Wyoming GOP convention, NY primary next

Ted Cruz on Saturday won all 14 delegates in the Wyoming GOP convention -- a relatively small number but enough for the Texas senator to declare victory and keep GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump from securing the nomination.
“We are likely to have a battle in Cleveland to decide who is the nominee,” Cruz told party members before they picked the delegates. “If you don’t want to see Donald Trump as the nominee, … then I ask you to please vote for the men and women on this slate.”
The Wyoming process mirrored that of Colorado, which was engulfed by political controversy after hosting a similar convention last week.
Cruz’s campaign ran circles around the Trump operation there, prompting Trump to slam the multi-tiered caucus system as “rigged.”
Cruz was expected to do well in Wyoming because his campaign had been lining up support there for months, too.
“The ground game is starting early and starting at your most local, smallest enclave,” said Ed Buchanan, Cruz’s Wyoming chairman.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

After being tapped by Cruz in February, Buchanan started drafting activists across the state. His efforts were bolstered by two days of Cruz campaign stops in Wyoming last August.
Trump did not actively campaign in either state, while Cruz put in face-time in both.
“You are going to hear this from me more and more: We have to bring our country together. We are a divided nation,” Trump said at a rally in upstate New York, ahead of the state’s primary Tuesday in which 95 GOP delegates are up for grabs.
Before Saturday, Trump had 742 delegates, followed by Cruz with 529 and Ohio Gov. John Kasich with 143. The winner needs 1,237 delegates to win the nomination. (Kasich is running second in the New York primary, according to polls.)
Senior Trump adviser Alan Cobb said about Colorado and Wyoming: "Candidates that have allies that are party insiders have advantages in states that have a pyramid process of selecting their delegates. These folks have worked this process for years."
Mindful of potential accusations, Wyoming GOP leaders are ready. Their message: The rules were set long before anyone announced their candidacy.
“Every presidential candidate for the last 40 years has managed this process and has worked through this process and has followed the process that we have in Wyoming,” state GOP Chairman Matt Micheli said in an interview with Fox News. “We are simply following the rules that are in place and that have been in place for a long time.”

U.S. Schools offended over Muslim Cartoons?

School superintendent, principal confront moms over 'Jesus Lunch'

Principal Stephen Plank

 

 

School administrators in Middleton, Wisconsin have intensified their threats and intimidation of a group of mothers who host a weekly “Jesus Lunch” for students at a park adjacent to Middleton High School.
New video shows school officials physically confronting one of the moms in the park — as one woman’s stunned husband observes from a distance. The moms were undeterred and told school officials they were going to serve lunch regardless of their objections.
Click here to join Todd’s American Dispatch: a must-read for Conservatives!
“These ongoing attempts to suppress free speech by school officials are disgraceful,” said Phillip Stamman, an attorney representing the moms. “These mothers devote hours each week to serving the students with free meals and a brief message about Jesus. They should not be bullied or harassed — but praised.”
Stamman said his clients have been repeatedly threatened by school officials - but they refuse to comply with their demands to cease the non-denominational religious gathering.
“These women will not be intimidated,” he told me. “They are wholeheartedly committed to serving the students a free meal while sharing a Christian message.”
I first wrote about the “Jesus Lunch” controversy earlier this week. So allow me to give you a brief primer on the hullabaloo.
Students at Middleton High School are permitted to eat lunch off campus. So go to McDonalds. Others go to Taco Bell. And some students eat at Fireman’s Park, a public park adjacent to the school campus.
In 2014, a group of moms started what would become known as the “Jesus Lunch.” They would prepared home-cooked meals for their children and conclude the lunch with an inspirational Christian message.
Over the years, the “Jesus Lunch” grew into a massive weekly event — with nearly 500 kids voluntarily attending.
But the school district wants to shut down the gathering — and as evidenced by the video — they will do anything to make sure that eventually happens.
“We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval,” the pair wrote in an email sent to parents on April 12.
The district accused the moms of violating all sorts of rules — especially in the area of food preparation. They implied the parents are putting their children in danger by hosting the weekly picnics.
“The policies in question include food handling, visitors to campus, and expectations around student organized events,” the administrators wrote. “We are in no way interested in opposing religious practice in otherwise legal circumstances.”
The district said parents are ignoring “food handling standards.”
“Food of any kind that is served to students must be approved by the school/district to ensure food safety, cleanliness and health,” they wrote. “In addition, many students are subject to food allergies, so additional protocols must be followed to safeguard students with these conditions.”
Principal Stephen Plank even accused the moms of luring students to the park with promises of free food in exchange for a Christian message.
“Many students have conveyed to us their concern about a group offering free food to incentivize participation in a religious event on campus,” he told News8000.com. “The result of which has a divisive impact on our learning community.”
The principal suggested that some students loathe the event so much they become hysterical.
“There are some students that when they know this day is coming, they will leave school early,” he told the news organization. “We have some students that staff will find sitting in the hallway crying.”
His remarks left me incredulous. I thought public schools provided “safe space” so youngsters could be shielded from opinions or concepts they don’t agree with?
The district also believes that the public park is technically a part of the campus. They have a lease agreement with the city that allows them to use the park during school hours. So the district contends the moms and their offspring are technically on school property.
“The parents contend that it is their First Amendment Right to provide free food and hold a religiously oriented event on this property during school hours,” the administrators wrote. “The District believes that we have jurisdiction of this leased property, which is part of our campus.”
The moms believe that even though there is a lease agreement — that doesn’t make the public space off-limits.
“Fireman's Park -- a public park owned by the City of Middleton -- remains accessible to everyone in the public for the purposes of assembly and free speech,” they wrote in a statement. “By law, the lease agreement between the city and the School District of Middleton does not privatize the park. The City of Middleton has sent us a letter this week and acknowledged our rental agreement of the pavilion at Fireman's Park.”
So hence, the standoff — between the goodhearted moms and a bunch of public school administrative bullies who don’t under the concept of free speech or religious liberty.  

Sanders gave 4 percent of income to charity in 2014, tax returns show

WASHINGTON –  Bernie Sanders released his full 2014 federal tax return Friday, revealing that he mostly lives off a six-figure government salary and donated about 4 percent of his family's income to charitable causes.
Sanders and his wife, Jane, donated $8,350 to charity while reporting an adjusted gross income of about $205,000 that year, according to his tax return. The share of his family's income that went to charity was about half the percentage of income that his primary opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, gave to charitable groups.
The Sanders campaign released the return a day after a heated Democratic presidential debate in New York in which Sanders pledged to release the single return but hesitated to say when he would release additional years of his taxes.
Sanders campaign didn't immediately respond Friday evening to emailed questions seeking additional details about Sanders' charitable giving.
Since 1976, every major party presidential nominee has released full tax returns. So far this year, though, Clinton is the only major-party presidential candidate who has released several years of full tax returns. GOP front-runner Donald Trump hasn't released any of his returns, and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich have only released partial returns.
Until Friday, Sanders had only released an excerpt from his 2014 tax return. During Thursday's debate, Clinton attacked Sanders for failing to release more.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

"I've released 30 years of tax returns, and I think every candidate, including Senator Sanders and Donald Trump, should do the same," said Clinton, the Democratic front-runner.
Sanders fired back at Clinton, contrasting his modest wealth with Clinton's multimillion-dollar income, a significant portion of which has come in the form of paid speeches to corporate and interest groups.
"I don't want to get anybody very excited. They are very boring tax returns," Sanders said. "No big money from speeches, no major investments. Unfortunately, I remain one of the poorer members of the United States Senate. And that's what that will show."
In 2014, the Clintons donated more than $3 million— nearly 11 percent of their income. Since 2000, the Clintons have given nearly $15 million to charity, tax returns show.

GOP leaders brace for new war of words over delegates ahead of Wyoming contest

CASPER, Wyo. –  Wyoming Republicans gathering this weekend to pick 14 delegates they’ll send to the national convention might register as a blip on the presidential race radar – especially with all eyes on Tuesday’s New York primary – but another Ted Cruz win could re-ignite Donald Trump’s flame-throwing attacks against the entire nominating process. 
The state will hold a convention Saturday where party members – not ordinary voters – will elect delegates to the national convention. The Wyoming process mirrors that of Colorado, which was engulfed by political controversy after hosting a similar convention last week.
Cruz’s campaign ran circles around the Trump operation there, prompting the primary front-runner to slam the multi-tiered caucus system as “rigged.” Likewise, Cruz is expected to do well in Wyoming, where his campaign has been lining up support for months.
Trump did not actively campaign in either state, while Cruz put in face-time in both – and plans to be in Wyoming Saturday for a last-minute appeal for support.
It’s a point the Cruz operation has stressed as it continues to battle Trump’s complaints about the process, while eyeing another potential headline victory this weekend.
“To me, the ground game is starting early and starting at your most local, smallest enclave,” said Ed Buchanan, Cruz’s Wyoming chairman. Since being tapped by Cruz in February, Buchanan has been drafting activists all across the state. His efforts were bolstered by two days of Cruz campaign stops in Wyoming last August.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

“It galvanizes the conservative support for a candidate that visits the state,” Buchanan said, noting voters appreciate the attention because Wyoming is typically not in play.
Wyoming party members on Saturday will elect 14 delegates to the national convention.
It comes after a full week of Trump accusing party officials of denying him delegates by changing the rules, allegedly impeding the will of the voters.
“Over one million people have been precluded from voting!” Trump tweeted amid the complaints about the Colorado convention. At least 65,000 Colorado Republicans participated in that process, according to the Colorado GOP.
Referring to both Colorado and Wyoming, senior Trump adviser Alan Cobb said: "Candidates that have allies that are party insiders have advantages in states that have a pyramid process of selecting their delegates. These folks have worked this process for years."
Mindful of potential accusations, Wyoming GOP leaders are ready. Their message: The rules were set long before anyone announced their candidacy.
“Every presidential candidate for the last 40 years has managed this process and has worked through this process and has followed the process that we have in Wyoming,” state GOP Chairman Matt Micheli said in an interview with Fox News. “We are simply following the rules that are in place and that have been in place for a long time.”
State party officials said they have been communicating with every campaign to make sure everyone knows the rules.

Delegates Awarded to Republican Candidates | InsideGov

“I've given all the campaigns my personal cell phone and told them, if there is anything that they don't have or that they need, to call me directly and I would do everything in my power to make sure that they have that,” Micheli said. “The state party is completely neutral. We want all the candidates to have a fair playing field.”
Republican National Committee chief strategist Sean Spicer issued a similar message in a memo on Friday about the delegate process.
“The rules surrounding the delegate selection have been clearly laid out in every state and territory and while each state is different, each process is easy to understand for those willing to learn it,” he wrote.
Wyoming is traditionally taken for granted because a presumptive nominee is usually on cruise control by the time the state votes.  Instead of burdening taxpayers with the financial responsibility of holding an inconsequential primary, the state legislature has embraced a caucus system, paid for exclusively by the parties.
At Republican precinct caucuses, voters elect delegates to county conventions. There, voters select 12 national delegates. They also pick delegates to serve at the upcoming state convention, where attendees will elect 14 more delegates – this weekend – to go to Cleveland.
“It's a system that encourages people to be engaged and to be involved,” Micheli said. “It works.
Thus far, the system has favored Cruz, who netted nine pledged delegates at Wyoming’s county conventions last month. Trump gained only one. Marco Rubio, still in the race at the time, also secured a delegate. Another was elected unpledged.
Ohio Gov. John Kasich, banking on a brokered convention, is not expected to fare well in Wyoming. But his campaign will still be meeting with delegates in hopes they can convince them to eventually vote for Kasich beyond a first ballot in Cleveland.
“We’ve done things quietly ahead of coming here … that put us in a good position,” Kasich senior aide Merle Madrid said.
Cruz will address Wyoming Republicans at the convention Saturday.
Late Thursday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin dropped her plans to address the convention on Trump’s behalf. The campaign cited a scheduling issue and hopes to replace her with another Trump surrogate.
Kasich will dispatch Idaho Gov. Butch Otter to represent his campaign. 

ABSCAM agents to FBI chief: Bureau's 'reputation' on the line in Clinton probe

Former FBI agents who worked the notorious 1970s sting operation known as ABSCAM have written FBI Director James Comey to warn that nothing less than the bureau's "reputation" is on the line as the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email practices enters a critical phase.
The agents, in a March 16 letter obtained by Fox News, offered their support for Comey and the agents working the email case. But the letter cautioned the outcome would have long-lasting implications.
"Decisions must be made on facts alone. Much is at stake here -- people's trust in the Bureau for years to come, as well as the Bureau's reputation among our allies, partners, and friends as the greatest law enforcement agency in the world,” wrote John F. Good, president of the Long Island Chapter of the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI.
Good told Fox News a half-dozen FBI agents who worked the 1978 ABSCAM investigation – which targeted sitting members of Congress -- belong to the chapter. The ABSCAM investigation included more than 30 political figures, with six House members and one U.S. senator ultimately convicted of crimes. The investigation was depicted in the 2013 Golden Globe-winning movie "American Hustle," in which Bradley Cooper played an agent based on Good and others.
Good, 79, told Fox News by phone that the Clinton email case boils down to whether the U.S. is a nation of laws, where all citizens are equal under the law, or there is a different set of rules for the powerful. He said the ABSCAM agents thought it was important to show support for the bureau’s work in the email probe since they know what it feels like to face intense public scrutiny.

Related Image

Expand / Contract

(John Good (Courtesy: Good Family))

Good, though, said the pressure the ABSCAM agents faced 40 years ago pales in comparison to what Comey and the agents are dealing with today regarding the Democratic presidential front-runner and her aides.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, President Obama weighed in on the ongoing email investigation, saying his former secretary of state had not intentionally harmed national security, but had been "careless" with her emails. White House Spokesman Josh Earnest later confirmed the president was not briefed on the investigation by the FBI or Justice Department, and had based his statements on media reports.
Obama, meanwhile, repeatedly vowed there would be no political influence in the case.
Good said that at the outset of ABSCAM, then-FBI Director William Webster had their backs and told them, "The future of the FBI rests on this case."
He said the same holds true today, but added that the retired agents are concerned Comey may not have the same level of support from the Justice Department, where Attorney General Loretta Lynch will make the decision on whether a prosecution is pursued.
"It does not appear that the same relationship between the FBI and DOJ exists today on the case," he told Fox News.
Then-FBI agent Good was a central player in ABSCAM. A native of the Bronx, and son of an FBI agent, he was known for his expertise navigating the tricky business of selecting and developing informants. In 1977, Good had been working on an ongoing inquiry into payoffs to officials in Suffolk County, N.Y., during a sewer project but the pressure from the bureau was to develop bigger and more major cases.

Related Image

Expand / Contract

FILE: FBI informant Mel Weinberg arrives at federal court in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Nov. 17, 1980. (AP Photo) (1980 AP)

So in 1977, Good selected a crook's crook by working with a colorful swindler from Long Island named Mel Weinberg (the basis for the “American Hustle” character played by Christian Bale) to ferret out widespread government corruption. The undercover operation featured agents posing as phony Arab sheiks toting suitcases full of cash and stolen artwork, all caught on 1,000 hours of videotape.
Now 91 and living in Florida, Weinberg told Fox News that "the country is going to pot. Today's politicians are too smart, the money is greater and they all learned from ABSCAM."

VA Cartoon