Presumptuous Politics

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Elizabeth Warren Cartoons

Huffington Post writer defends 'violent resistance' against Donald Trump

A writer for the Huffington Post is defending his recent op-ed that "a violent response” is the “logical” approach to stopping presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.
Jesse Benn wrote in the op-ed titled “Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any,” posted on Monday, “[T]here’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this.”
"These denunciations of violence from anti-Trump protestors rest on the misguided view that the divide Trump’s exposed is a typical political disagreement between partisans, and should be handled as such.," he wrote. "This couldn’t be further from the truth. Trump might not be a fascist in the 20th century European sense of the term—though many of his supporters are—but he might represent its 21st century US version."
"Violent resistance matters. Riots can lead to major change," Benn wrote. "It’s not liberal politicians or masses that historians identify as the spark underlying the modern movement for LGBTQ equality. Nor was it a think piece from some smarmy liberal writer. It was the people who took to the streets during the Stonewall Uprising."
"Assuming anti-Trump protests should be strictly focused on electoral politics and not these broader goals would be a detrimental oversight," he wrote. "Understanding European anti-fascists use of violent tactics to shut down large rallies from White Supremacists can be illustrative here. Because while Trump isn’t leading full bore White Supremacist rallies, there is value in making it clear that even his fascism-lite has no place in civilized society."
Benn took to Twitter to defend his piece.
"It is funny I wrote that piece specifically calling out liberals but it’s #AltRight fanatics/White Supremacists throwing a tantrum over it," he wrote.
He also received plenty of backlash online.
This controversial piece came nearly a week after an editor with the website Vox was suspended for a series of tweets encouraging protesters to "start a riot" at Donald Trump rallies – shortly after the Republican candidate's supporters were attacked outside a San Jose rally the night before.
"We welcome a variety of viewpoints, but we do not condone writing that could put others in danger,” the site's founder, Ezra Klein, said in a statement announcing the suspension of Emmett Rensin.
Rensin, deputy editor for the site's first-person section, had taken to Twitter as reports first emerged of the chaotic scenes last Thursday night outside the California rally, where protesters confronted supporters of the presumptive GOP nominee as they departed. Supporters were punched, and one woman was seen on film being hit with an egg and other trash.

Jesse Benn (Idiot)

Elizabeth Warren to endorse Hillary Clinton, source says

Surprise :-)

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is expected to endorse presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton next week, a source told Fox News Wednesday.
The endorsement from the senator could come as early as Monday, according to the Democratic source.
The move represents a shift for Warren, who up until now has not backed either Clinton or Bernie Sanders.
The fiery critic of Wall Street and popular figure among progressive Democrats is often mentioned as being on the short list for Vice President.
Some Democrats believe she is the best chance for the Clinton campaign to attract Sanders voters, and that she can effectively tussle with Trump on his most-effective medium: Twitter.
Last month, Warren called the presumptive Republican presidential candidate a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who doesn't care whom he hurts, as long as he can make money in a speech in Washington.
Warren pointed to comments Trump made in 2007 that he's always made more money in bad markets than in good markets.
"Donald Trump was drooling over the idea of a housing meltdown because it meant he could buy up a bunch more property on the cheap," Warren said. "What kind of a man does that? Root for people to get thrown out on the street?"
"Pocahontas is at it again," Trump said in an email to The Associated Press in response to questions about Warren's remarks. "She scammed the people of Massachusetts and got into institutions because she said she is Native American. She's one of the least successful Senators in the U.S. Senate."
During her 2012 election campaign, when she ousted incumbent Republican Sen. Scott Brown, Warren was criticized after being listed in law school directories as having Native American ancestry.
Warren has dismissed similar criticism by Trump in the past as recycling what she described as "Brown's hate-filled attacks on my family."

Clinton says email scandal, FBI probe 'absolutely' won't be general election problems

Hillary Clinton doubled down Wednesday on claims that her personal email scandal will not hurt her presidential bid or result in an indictment, in an interview with Fox News in which she made only a passing reference to another more immediate hurdle -- Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The Vermont senator continues to stay in the Democratic primary race despite Clinton securing enough delegates earlier this week to become the party’s presumptive presidential nominee.
“I applaud Sen. Sanders' vigorous determined campaign,” Clinton told Fox News' Bret Baier one day after her big win over Sanders in California. “I think that our primary contest was good for the Democratic Party and good for America.”
Clinton said the probe into the Clinton Foundation -- in addition to the controversy about her use of a private email server when secretary of state and the related FBI investigation -- will not impact her general election bid, though such issues did create problems in her primary campaign.
“That's what I'm saying. That happens to be the truth,” Clinton said in the interview.
Clinton also reiterated what she told 1070 Radio on Friday about the FBI probe into the email scandal not resulting in an indictment.
“Absolutely that is not going to happen,” she said. “There is no basis for it. And I'm looking forward to this being wrapped up as soon as possible.”
However, Clinton declined to say whether anybody inside the department told her or any associates how the investigation will conclude, saying only that she knows the department has spoken to “a number of people” close her and that she’s willing to talk to federal investigators.
Clinton said she previously declined to talk to investigators about the email issue because “what they wanted to ask, we'd already talked about … in the public arena.
She pointed out her 11 hours of Capitol Hill testimony on the matter and concluded the exchange by saying she wasn’t going to comment on ongoing litigation “or make any legal points.”
Clinton also repeated her arguments that she never sent or received classified information by the server system and that previous secretaries of state had similar setups.

Clinton also waived off a question about whether her husband President Bill Clinton understands the modern-day economy well enough to be an economic adviser if she becomes president.
“I think there are lessons to learn from what my husband did during his eight years,” she said. “I'm going to be looking for good advice, and one of my best advisers about what we can do to really help people who feel left out and left behind will be my husband.
Sanders said after losing in California said that he will compete in the primary in Washington, D.C., next week. However, it's unclear whether he will continue to take his campaign into the party's July nominating convention, trying along the way to get superdelegates committed to Clinton to instead vote for him.
Sanders is scheduled to talk Thurdsay with President Obama in a meeting in which they will liklely speak about Sanders staying in the race or dropping out to help create party unity.

Could Sanders seek DNC chairwoman's removal in deal for party unity?

Bernie Sanders has a lot to talk about when he meets with President Obama Thursday in Washington – and Fox News has learned one potential issue the still-kicking Democratic presidential candidate may raise is whether Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains at the helm of the party.
Sanders and the Democratic National Committee chairwoman have been at odds for months, with Sanders’ team long accusing her of helping now-presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton.
Though Sanders has yet to concede the race, a question on Capitol Hill is whether he may seek Wasserman Schultz’ ouster as part of a deal toward party unity.
“I don’t see how she makes it through the convention,” one Democratic lawmaker told Fox News. “The key to Hillary winning is getting Sanders supporters on board.”
Speculation over Wasserman Schultz’ position has swirled for months, however, and so far she has retained the public support of the White House. President Obama also endorsed her earlier this year in her House primary battle.
Asked Wednesday about the possibility of Sanders seeking her removal during meetings Thursday with Obama and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Wasserman Schultz said she’s not worried about her job.
“I'm going to be remaining as the chair of the Democratic National Committee as President Obama has asked me to do until January 21, 2017, and I appreciate the president’s support,” she said.
As for concerns about being able to unify the Democratic Party, she said: "I’m very confident that we are going to be unified."
Still, Fox News has learned some factions in the Democratic Party as well as Sanders loyalists have pushed for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, as a potential replacement at the helm of the DNC. Gabbard is a Sanders supporter, which could help with outreach to Sanders backers and bring Sanders himself into the fold.
When asked if she was interested in being party chair, Gabbard told Fox News she was not.
She also noted she has not called for the DNC to relieve Wasserman Schultz of her duties.
Gabbard said she has no plans at this point to meet with Sanders in Washington on Thursday.
However, Gabbard said Sanders should continue to fight through the convention.
“If you look at the people who voted for Sanders, their voices should be heard,” Gabbard said.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

DOJ Holder Cartoons ( The Past Can Still Haunt )

Trump on defensive as media paint judge controversy as Republican problem

This is what it looks like when the whole world is against you.
The media are denouncing Donald Trump. The Democrats are denouncing Donald Trump. Other Republicans are denouncing Donald Trump—in fact, not a single prominent member of the GOP is defending him.
And it all stems from a self-inflicted wound.
When the House speaker, Paul Ryan, who just reluctantly endorsed Trump, describes Trump’s remarks about a judge of Mexican heritage as “a textbook racist comment” that is “indefensible,” you’ve got a problem.
Trump tried to subtly tone things down when Bill O’Reilly asked him about the firestorm. Trump had doubled and tripled down in a series of interviews—with the Wall Street Journal, CNN and CBS—saying that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel could not be fair to him in the Trump University suit because of his Mexican heritage. Curiel was born in Indiana.
On the Factor, without retracting his previous comments, Trump said: “I don’t care if the judge is Mexican or not.”
He also tried to shift the spotlight to the press: “The question was asked to me.” Trump said he would rather be talking about other issues, “but every time I go onto a show, all they want to do is talk about Trump University…Frankly, I don’t even like wasting my time talking about this lawsuit.”
But any candidate can brush off questions he doesn’t want to deal with, as Trump sometimes does. It’s harder when you’ve made an ethnic-based criticism against a sitting federal judge, that journalists naturally want to ask about.
Trump tried again yesterday with a campaign statement: "It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage...I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial."
But the most important sentence may have been this one: "I do not intend to comment on this matter any further."
During the primaries, there was a similar uproar over Trump’s proposal to temporarily bar Muslims from entering the United States, with widespread media and political condemnation. But it turned out that most Republican primary voters agreed with him. Now, however, Trump has to deal with a much broader electorate.
More important, the Muslim proposal was connected to national security. Whether you found the plan offensive or not, Trump could always pivot to the argument that we had to get the system under control to ensure that Islamic terrorists didn’t slip through and kill innocent people.
But the only larger issue in the Curiel case involves one of Trump’s business ventures. The allegations have been kicking around, and journalists have been writing about them, for years. So Trump has allowed his campaign to be diverted over a private grievance at a time when he is trying to unite the GOP against Hillary Clinton.
The media are loving this, and not just because it’s a juicy story. For a year now, journalists have been reporting on Trump saying controversial and inflammatory things and predicting his imminent demise, only to see him keep winning. So there is a bit of see-we-told-you-so now that this story has blown up.
Newt Gingrich, despite reports that he is on Trump’s VP list, said it was the candidate’s biggest mistake. Lindsey Graham, who had been tiptoeing toward a rapproachement with Trump, is now asking GOP leaders to un-endorse him. It has been painful to watch other Republicans, from Mitch McConnell to Chris Christie to Bob Corker, dance around the controversy.
Former rivals like Marco Rubio can’t resist: “I ran for president, and I warned this was going to happen.”
And the press seems determined to make this a Republican Party problem.
Just take a look at the Washington Post’s op-ed page yesterday:
George Will: “The ‘Big Price’ Paul Ryan Has Paid for Supporting Donald Trump.”
Richard Cohen: “Paul Ryan’s Profile in Cowardice.”
Dana Milbank: Republicans Discover that Trump is an Actual Racist.”
Gene Robinson: “Endorsing Trump Will Leave a Mark.”
And he gets whacked by the New York Times editorial page: “Mr. Trump holds the rule of law in contempt.”
Plus, Buzzfeed has decreed that he is so odious it is canceling a million-dollar RNC advertising contract on Trump’s behalf.
You’re even starting to see comments like this, from CNBC contributor and former anchor Ron Insana:
“I am beginning to think Trump will not be the Republican candidate for president this year. The GOP may abandon him. He may not be able to field a VP. He can't find surrogates. I predict he may take his ball and go home.”
Trump isn’t going anywhere. The question is whether his statement enables him to move on from this mess and how much he has damaged himself, especially with Hispanic voters and leaders of his own party.
He has been a master of changing the subject in the past. But scrutiny as a general election nominee is more intense than when you’re mocking your rivals as Lyin’ Ted and Little Marco. Trump had better hope that Clinton, who has clinched her own nomination, is subjected to the same level of media probing and skepticism.
Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.

Trump brushes aside judge controversy, goes after Clinton

Donald Trump brushed aside the latest controversy over his remarks on a federal judge Tuesday night to deliver a broadside against Hillary Clinton -- even promising to deliver a blockbuster speech on her next week -- as he closed out the primary season with another set of wins, while saying he understands the “responsibility” of being the presumptive GOP nominee.
“I understand the responsibility of carrying the mantle,” Trump said. “I will never, ever let you down.”
His remarks come as Fox News projects Trump has surpassed a new milestone in the Republican primary contest Tuesday night.
With fresh victories in California, New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico and South Dakota, Trump now has enough bound delegates alone to clinch the GOP nomination, no longer having to rely in part on ‘unbound’ delegates, technically free to change their minds, to amass the 1,237 needed to secure the nomination.
In turning his attacks on Clinton, the billionaire businessman said she and former President Bill Clinton “have turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves” and that Hillary Clinton “turned the State Department into her own private hedge fund."
“They’ve made hundreds of millions of dollars selling access, selling favors, selling government contracts,” Trump said from Trump National Golf Club, in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
Trump also promised to deliver a speech next week on Clinton, and as a likely preview again mentioned her problems using a private email server while running the State Department.
“Secretary Clinton even did all of the work on a totally illegal private server … designed to keep her corrupt dealings out of the public record.”
Trump made no mention of U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, presiding over a civil fraud suit related to Trump University, attempting to end a controversy that has hurt his campaign in recent weeks.
He has said that Curiel, whose parents are Mexican, cannot be impartial in the case, considering Trump has vowed to build a wall along the southern U.S. border to keep out Mexican “rapists” and “drug dealers.”
“It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage,” Trump said earlier Tuesday, in a 700-word statement, an apparent attempt to move past the controversy,
Trump also wrote that he does not intend to comment further but used the statement to elaborate on his initial claim that a federal judge’s Mexican heritage presented a conflict of interest for him in Trump University litigation.
The statement capped what was arguably Trump’s toughest day of criticism from leading members of his own party.
House Speaker Paul Ryan earlier Tuesday called the remarks the “textbook definition of a racist comment.” Ryan disavowed Trump’s comments, calling them “unacceptable.”
Trump’s comments were immediately denounced by a number of high-profile Republicans.
Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., who is facing a tough re-election race, said Tuesday he will no longer support Trump for president.
He said he would not support presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, either, and would instead “write in General Petraeus.”

Sanders to lay off most campaign staff over next week

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will lay off "over half" of his campaign staff over the next week, a senior campaign official confirmed to Fox News Wednesday.
Confirmation of the layoffs, which were first reported by The New York Times, came after Sanders vowed to continue his bid for the Democratic nomination despite Hillary Clinton securing a majority of pleged delegates and superdelegates ahead of next month's convention.
The Times reported that most of those being laid off are advance and field staff members, some of whom may be moved to jobs at Sanders' Senate office. Politico reported that campaign personnel whose work isn't related to next month's District of Columbia primary or the convention will be let go.
"Most of the field staff will likely get their 10-day notice tomorrow because there's no work for then to do," a former Sanders state director told Politico.
Sanders plans to return to his home in Vermont Wendesday before traveling to Washington Thursday for meetings with President Barack Obama and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.

Clinton clinches Democratic nomination – Sanders vows to fight on

The Democrats deserve her as Their Leader :-)

Hillary Clinton clinched the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, becoming the first woman in American history to top the ticket of a major political party and putting immediate pressure on primary rival Bernie Sanders to step aside – though the Vermont senator vowed to keep fighting for “every delegate.”
As Clinton now launches a general election battle against presumptive rival Donald Trump, Sanders remained defiant at an early Wednesday morning rally in Los Angeles. Far from bowing out, he vowed to campaign through the final primary next Tuesday in Washington, D.C., and then “take our fight for social, economic, racial and environmental justice to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,” the site of the convention.
The crowd erupted in cheers as Sanders announced he’d keep going, a decision he kept close to the vest right up until his remarks.
Sanders closed by declaring: “Thank you all, the struggle continues.”
The remarks were in some ways surprising considering not only Clinton’s historic achievement but her strong performance overall in Tuesday’s primaries. While winning at least three states, she also is leading in early returns out of delegate-rich California, though Sanders predicted that gap would close.
Clinton earlier claimed victory over Sanders – after attaining the delegates needed to claim the nomination with a New Jersey primary win – during a lofty speech to supporters in Brooklyn.
“Thanks to you, we’ve reached a milestone,” Clinton declared.
Marking the historic moment, Clinton said: “This campaign is about making sure there are no ceilings, no limits on any of us.”
She also congratulated Sanders, calling his campaign and the debate he brought about income inequality good for the party – while also saying this is a moment to “come together.”
In a potential move toward reconciliation, the White House revealed that President Obama called both Clinton and Sanders Tuesday night – and plans to meet with Sanders at the White House on Thursday, to discuss "how to build on the extraordinary work he has done to engage millions of Democratic voters."
Clinton tried to pivot to November at the close of the last major day of primary voting.

2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Tracker | InsideGov

Eight years to the day after she conceded to rival Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, the former first lady and secretary of state became the presumptive 2016 nominee with the help of delegates in New Jersey. She won the state's primary, and with it enough delegates to easily surpass the 2,383 needed to clinch the nomination. She also is projected to win New Mexico and South Dakota.
Clinton's victory, however, is based in part on the support of superdelegates, officials who are free to support any candidate and who do not technically vote for a nominee until the Democratic National Convention next month. Sanders has vowed to stay in the race in hopes of convincing enough of them to abandon Clinton and support him instead.
Speaking in Los Angeles, Sanders again vowed to fight “for every vote and every delegate,” hammering his campaign themes of campaign finance reform and economic justice and calling for “transforming our country.”
It is still too early to call a winner in the California race, whose outcome could also weigh on Sanders’ calculations going forward.
However, Fox News can project that with the delegates she is winning in California, Clinton will have now won a majority of all pledged delegates at the Democratic convention -- making it more difficult for Sanders to argue she’s winning only because of support from superdelegates.
Sanders did notch projected wins Tuesday in North Dakota’s Democratic caucuses and the Montana primary. A total of six states were voting Tuesday.
On the GOP side, Trump -- the only major Republican left in the race – was projected to win the primaries in California, Montana, New Jersey, South Dakota and New Mexico. Trump also surpassed a new milestone in the primary contest Tuesday night, winning enough bound delegates alone to clinch the GOP nomination.
Marking his victories during remarks at Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y., Trump said: “Tonight, we close one chapter in history and we begin another.”
Previewing the general election battle, he slammed the Clintons, alleging they “turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves.” He also appealed to Sanders supporters, saying, “We welcome you with open arms.”
Clinton, in her victory speech, also took shots at Trump, claiming he would “take America backwards.”
“The stakes in this election are high, and the choice is clear. Donald Trump is temperamentally unfit to be president,” she said.
The contests Tuesday largely conclude one of the most unpredictable and rowdy primary seasons in modern history – one that saw a brash billionaire clear through a formidable field of 16 rivals to defy the pundits and claim the GOP nomination, and the front-runner on the Democratic side locked in a fight to the end against a socialist-leaning senator from Vermont.
Voting formally ends next week when the District of Columbia holds its Democratic primary.
Even before Tuesday’s contests, both parties effectively had their presumptive nominees. Trump clinched the nomination last month as late support from unbound delegates put him over the top, and his remaining rivals suspended their campaigns. The Associated Press declared Monday night that Clinton had hit the 2,383-delegate mark, thanks to a burst of support from free-agent superdelegates.
But unlike Trump, Clinton’s last remaining rival has not exited the race.
“There is nothing to concede,” Sanders said in a TV interview Monday night.
Sanders also had said he’d “assess” his plans after Tuesday’s elections, as he heads home to Burlington, but gave no indications of having second thoughts during his Los Angeles rally.
The Democratic Party pressure on him, however, is sure to mount in a matter of days, if not hours. Obama reportedly is planning to get behind Clinton and start campaigning for her, and senior Democrats have been voicing mounting frustration with Sanders’ campaign.
At the same time, the senator has touted general election polls suggesting he may be better positioned to go up against Trump in the fall. Over the course of the campaign, he mounted an unexpectedly strong challenge to Clinton, buoyed by the support of young and energetic voters whose enthusiasm at times echoed the spirit behind Barack Obama’s bid in 2008. Clinton was dogged all along by questions about her private email use while secretary of state – and a still-ongoing FBI investigation – though Sanders largely steered clear of the issue in his campaign.
Trump, by contrast, will have no compunction about hammering Clinton for what he describes as “criminal” activity with her email use, as the general election race now moves into full swing. He did so Tuesday night, ripping her use of a "totally illegal private server."
Both presumptive nominees have been cranking up their attacks on each other in anticipation of their November brawl.
Yet even as Trump has seen all 16 of his rivals fade away, he’s still struggling in a historic way to unite the GOP behind him. The tensions flared again this week as leading Republicans condemned his comments that a federal judge of Mexican heritage had a conflict of interest in a Trump University case. On Tuesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan called it the “textbook definition of a racist comment.”