President Trump is scheduled to interview at least four candidates
for the U.S. national security adviser position in Florida on Sunday.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One Saturday, Trump said he had "many, many that want the job."
Trump also hinted he had a favorite to fill the position.
"I've been thinking about someone for the last three
or four days, we'll see what happens," Trump said. "I'm meeting with
that person. They're all good, they're all great people."
Reuters reported that Trump also told reporters on Air Force One that he plans to “make a decision over the next couple of days.”
Scheduled to discuss the job with the president at
Mar-a-Lago were his acting adviser, retired Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg;
John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations; Army Lt.
Gen. H.R. McMaster; and the superintendent of the U.S. Military Academy
at West Point, Lt. Gen. Robert Caslen.
White House spokesman Sean Spicer said more meetings
for the job could happen, which is now open after retired Gen. Michael
Flynn was asked to resign earlier this week.
Flynn resigned at Trump's request Monday after
revelations that he misled Vice President Mike Pence about discussing
sanctions with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. during the transition.
Trump said in a news conference Thursday that he was disappointed by how
Flynn had treated Pence, but did not believe Flynn had done anything
wrong by having the conversations.
Trump's first choice to replace Flynn, retired Vice Adm. Robert Harward, turned down the offer.
Trump tweeted on Saturday that he “will be having many meetings this weekend at The Southern White House.”
Trump tries to get back on message in epic news conference
By
Bryan Dean Wright
Over the past few months, America has lurched from partisan warfare to the cliffs of an existential crisis.
Multiple reports
show that my former colleagues in the intelligence community have
decided that they must leak or withhold classified information due to unsettling connections between President Trump and the Russian Government.
Said an intelligence officer: “I know what's best for foreign policy and national security… And I'm going to act on that.”
Some of us might applaud this man, including a few of
my fellow Democrats. In their minds, this is a case of Mr. Smith Goes
to Langley to do battle against a corrupt President Trump.
One small problem. The intelligence officer quoted above was actually Aldrich Ames, a CIA traitor whose crime of treason in the 1980s and 1990s resulted in the compromise of more than 100 assets. Many were tortured and executed as a result.
Ames’ flawed logic is eerily similar to that of his
present-day colleagues who are engaged in a shadow war with their
commander in chief. They, too, have decided that their superior judgment
is more important than following the law.
For the sake of argument, however, let’s assume that
these officials are somehow different than Ames. Let’s suppose that they
have compelling pieces of information that indeed suggest Trump or his
staff have committed treason.
When you’re trained as a spy, you’re taught how to
handle these kinds of situations. Upon learning the information, it gets
tightly compartmented (restricted) and sent to the Department of
Justice or Congress for investigation. If the evidence is found to be
credible, the constitution makes clear what happens next: impeachment.
That’s how American democracy should work.
And that’s precisely how it has been working. According to former Vice President Biden,
there’s been an on-going investigation into the alleged connections
between Trump and Russia. All of us should take heart in knowing that
the system is functioning exactly as designed.
However, some of America’s spies are deciding that
that’s not enough. For reasons of misguided righteousness or partisan
hatred, they’ve taken it upon themselves to be judge, jury, and
executioner. They have prosecuted their case in the court of public
opinion, with likeminded media outlets such as CNN, The New York Times, and the Washington Post serving as court stenographers.
Elected by no one, responsible only to each other,
these spies have determined that Trump is guilty of high crimes and
misdemeanors.
Days ago, they delivered their verdict. According to one intelligence official, the president “will die in jail.”
I understand how this might feel appealing to deeply
partisan Democrats. After all, I didn’t want Trump to win either. But
the solution to fighting this subpar president cannot be encouraging a
network of spies to tip the scales back in our political favor. We must
instead let the system continue to work, as it has, and make our case to
the American people during future elections.
If you’re not convinced, imagine the consequences of
letting spies decide not just Trump’s fate but other political winners
and losers too. Imagine how they might treat our candidates next.
Flash-forward to November 4, 2020, where Senators
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have defeated Donald Trump and Mike
Pence for the White House. Democrats will celebrate in the streets. The
liberal spies will smile.
Mission accomplished.
Conservative spies, however, will take a darker view.
To them, their liberal colleagues will have gotten away with political
murder. They’ll be looking for revenge.
Welcome to the new America. It’s now their turn to burn democracy down. And they’ve got the tools and motivation to do it.
This is the slippery slope of political tribalism
that, up until a few months ago, I would have thought impossible in
America. Certainly it happens in third world nations but not here. I was trained to believe that we were exceptional.
In the culture of America’s spies, you live and die
by a set of rules. One of them is a sacred pledge of allegiance to the
constitution and commander in chief. Spies may not like a president or
their policies but they must salute their leader nonetheless. If they
cannot, they are told to resign.
Spies also take a vow of secrecy, specifically to
keep classified information hidden from anyone who doesn’t have an
authorized need to know. It’s a commitment one keeps for a lifetime. And
should that vow be violated, the consequences are dire. Prison time.
Colleagues and informants killed. Enemies emboldened. The country less
safe.
Spies also accept and embrace a final rule: there
must be an unbreakable wall between government workers and the
democratic process.
Why?
Because many spies have access to powerful tools
that, if used improperly, could cause incredible damage to the nation’s
stability. Accordingly, clandestine officers have a special covenant
with the American people – codified by the Hatch Act – that limits their participation in politics.
During my time as a CIA officer, I quickly learned
why all these rules were in place. I read people’s emails. I listened to
phone calls. I recruited assets that told the dirtiest and most
embarrassing of secrets. I came to realize that my power was both an
awesome responsibility and, at times, wickedly seductive.
Some of us faltered in our commitments. I remember
colleagues who believed themselves above the rules, conducting quiet
investigations into cheating wives or ex-boyfriends. They were
eventually discovered and rightfully thrown out. They had demonstrated
an inability to handle the burden of power.
And that is precisely what we are experiencing today.
The spies who are plotting against President Trump are breaking U.S.
laws. They’re violating their oaths. And they’re committing treason to
remedy (perceived) treason.
They likely don’t see it that way, of course. But, then again, neither did Aldrich Ames.
With luck and aggressive investigations, these
renegade spies will join their fallen colleague at the Allenwood
Correctional Facility for the remainder of their lives.
I look forward to watching the gates forever close behind them. Bryan Dean Wright is a former CIA ops officer and member of the
Democratic Party. He contributes on issues of politics, national
security, and the economy. Follow him on Twitter @BryanDeanWright.
Officials in several U.S. communities labeled “sanctuaries” for
illegal immigrants say the feds have it wrong, and they fear losing
funding under a new directive from President Trump.
Saratoga, N.Y., is on one widely circulated list,
and wants off, said Undersheriff Richard Castle. It didn't make much
difference until Trump said he would punish cities that limit or
virtually prohibit local law enforcement from working proactively with
immigration agents.
“We have no idea how we got on this list,” Castle
told Fox News. “We notify [immigration officials] all along the way when
we arrest someone, and we contact [immigration officials] to verify
their status. We are willing to share all our records with immigration
[agents], and if we have a suspected violation we will notify them.”
The list of sanctuary communities that has gotten the
most attention since Trump became president was compiled by the Center
for Immigration Studies (CIS), a Washington, D.C.-based organization
that favors strict immigration policies.
Jessica Vaughan, a CIS analyst and its point person
on sanctuary communities, put the list together, culling information
from Homeland Security, as well as other sources such as media accounts
and information gleaned directly from interviews of local government
administrators.
Vaughan said she has a thorough method for putting a locality on the list.
“I look at whether they have a policy that blocks ICE
access to jails,” Vaughan said. “Do they have a policy that blocks
officers from communicating with ICE? I may ask them to give me a
statement” to corroborate what they assert.
Then she checks the information with ICE, she said.
Vaughan said she decided to take Saratoga County off
after she spoke with officials there about their objection to being on
the list and looking into their practices.
Some counties end up on the list, apparently, because
they require – often because of state rules – that ICE provide an
administrative or judicial warrant along with a formal request that an
illegal immigrant who has been arrested be held in detention until
agents can arrive and begin deportation proceedings.
Both Saratoga and Bradford County, Pa., officials
believe that was seen by groups compiling lists as an attempt by their
agencies to put up roadblocks to ICE efforts to pick up an immigrant.
Bradford County Commissioner Doug McLinko said the
community he represents had to start requiring a court order from ICE to
hold a detained immigrant beyond a release date because of concerns
over lawsuits.
“I’m appalled that we’re tagged as a sanctuary, we’re
completely the opposite of that,” McLinko told Fox News. “We are a law
and order county.
"It makes us very mad that we got grouped with
sanctuary counties, just because some organization comes out with a
list," he added.
Vaughan added that she does not expect that the Trump
administration will go by CIS’s list and “start tearing up [federal
funding] checks.”
In Ocean County, N.J., officials say they wrongly ended up on some lists of sanctuary communities.
“Absolutely, positively not,” a county public
information officer, Richard Petersen, told Fox News. “We are not a
sanctuary county. Frankly, we don’t know why that’s happened.”
A Trump executive order on immigration said that his
administration would identify places that appear to have sanctuary
policies that prohibit enforcing immigration laws and will deny those
communities federal funding.
DHS officials say the Trump administration will establish its criteria for what constitutes a sanctuary city, county, or state.
“The Department of Homeland Security is working to
implement the president’s executive orders,” said Gillian Christensen,
acting press secretary, in an email to Fox News. “When we have more
information to share about how sanctuary jurisdictions will be
determined, we will.”
Regardless of where they stand on immigration
enforcement and sanctuary policies, many local, county and state
officials say they welcome a clear definition of a sanctuary community.
There is no hard and fast definition, and now, more than ever, that can
have dire consequences, they say.
Vic DeLuca, the mayor of Maplewood, N.J., which has
an ordinance declaring itself a sanctuary city, says the concept of
sanctuary communities has been distorted by Trump and others who oppose
it.
“The president has polluted the term,” said DeLuca,
who added that about 26 percent of Maplewood’s population is
foreign-born. “He’s used it for his own benefit, to say that if you’re a
sanctuary city you’re shielding criminals, you’re harboring fugitives.”
Sean Hannity reacted to the media's meltdown after receiving a
"historic beating" at the hands of President Donald Trump yesterday.
He
noted that NBC News' Chuck Todd compared Trump to Richard Nixon, CBS'
Scott Pelley called out the president for "bluster, bravado,
exaggeration and few loose facts," ABC News' Matthew Dowd said he came
off as "small and insecure," and CNN's Jack Tapper told Trump to "get to
work and stop whining."
Hannity said that Trump has been working, and he simply used Thursday's press conference to defend himself from an "out of control media bias."
"Not only was he being presidential, not only was he being honest, but he was being funny," Hannity said.
He said the press' reaction is just "one huge temper tantrum," because they finally got called out for their bad behavior.
"All
the members of the media, they can be bad all they want. It doesn't
change the fact how biased, how lazy they are, and how abusive they've
been toward the 45th president."
Two F-15s caused a ‘sonic boom’ as they raced from their base in
Homestead, Fla., Friday to intercept an unresponsive general aviation
aircraft that flew near Palm Beach during a stay by President Trump at
Mar-a-Lago.
The jets flew at supersonic speeds and residents were
startled by the loud boom, the North American Aerospace Defense
Command, NORAD, said in a statement. The two fighters were able to
establish communication with the aircraft. This incident occured at
about 7 p.m. ET. No further details were immediately available.
"The intent of military intercepts is to have the
identified aircraft re-establish communications with local FAA air
traffic controllers and instruct the pilot to follow air traffic
controllers' instructions to land safely for follow-on action," the
statement read. TRUMP HINTS AT 'BIG ORDER' OF F/A-18 SUPER HORNETS Earlier this month, a private plane got within 2
nautical miles of Air Force One, which is closer than permitted, while
flying over Florida and the incident is being investigated by
authorities, Bloomberg reported.
The planes were flying on a parallel route and there
was no risk of a collision during the incident, which occurred 30 miles
out on Feb. 3, sources told the news agency. President Trump arrived
safely at Palm Beach International Airport.
The report said that when Air Force One is in flight, Secret Service agents work with FAA supervisors and monitor for threats.
Report alleges George Soros is meddling in foreign affairs
George Soros' alleged meddling in European politics has caught the attention of Congress.
Concerns about Soros' involvement most recently were
raised by the Hungarian prime minister, who last week lashed out at the
Soros "empire" and accused it of deploying "tons of money and
international heavy artillery."
But days earlier, Republican lawmakers in Washington
started asking questions about whether U.S. tax dollars also were being
used to fund Soros projects in the small, conservative-led country of
Macedonia.
Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., led a group of House
lawmakers in writing to Ambassador Jess Baily -- an Obama appointee --
demanding answers. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, also expressed concerns about
USAID money going to Soros' Open Society Foundations as part of a
broader concern that the U.S. Embassy has been taking sides in party
politics.
“I have received credible reports that, over the past
few years, the US Mission to Macedonia has actively intervened in the
party politics of Macedonia, as well as the shaping of its media
environment and civil society, often favoring groups of one political
persuasion over another,” Lee said in his letter.
Together, the concerns reflect growing conservative pushback against Soros' operations in Europe.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban last week
ripped the Hungary-born billionaire's "trans-border empire." Orban has
been one of the central European voices speaking out against the push by
E.U. leaders to absorb Syrian refugees and has been criticized for his
hardline stance.
Soros' Open Society Foundations -- one of the
billionaire's biggest groups operating across the globe -- fired back,
saying Orban was trying to deflect attention from other issues.
“The Open Society Foundations for over 30 years have
supported civil society groups in Hungary who are addressing profound
problems in education, health care, media freedom and corruption," Laura
Silber, the organization's chief communications officer, said in a
statement to The Associated Press. "Any attacks on this work and those
groups are solely an attempt to deflect attention from government
inability to address these issues."
The group's stated goal is “to build vibrant and
tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their
citizens” but critics claim it's a front for Soros’ hard-left political
maneuverings.
Former Macedonian PM Nikola Gruevski says Soros has a "decisive influence" on his country’s politics.
“If it were not for George Soros behind it with all
the millions he pours into Macedonia, the entire network of NGOs, media,
politicians, inside and out ... the economy would be stronger, we would
have had more new jobs,” he said in a recent interview with Macedonia’s
Republika newspaper.
Macedonia, while small, is a broadly conservative
country. It has a flat rate tax of 10 percent, a small-government
philosophy and a ruling conservative party (VMRO-DPMNE) that has greeted
the election of President Trump warmly and pledged to work with him.
Lee’s staff recently met with Macedonia lawmakers,
who also passed on a white paper from a citizen’s initiative called
“Stop Operation Soros” which alleges U.S. money has been funding
hard-left causes in the country -- including violent riots in the
streets, as well as a Macedonian version of Saul Alinsky’s far-left
handbook “Rules for Radicals.”
In an extensive 40-page dossier, the group alleges
USAID money is being used to fund activists and exclusively left-wing
media groups as a way to sway the country’s politics.
The Open Society Foundations did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News.
On the Soros connection, Lee’s letter asked if the
Mission has “selected the Open Society Foundations as the major
implementer of USAID projects in Macedonia” and if the group has been
perceived to have political bias in Macedonia.
In a reply dated Feb. 9, the State Department told
Lee that the Mission in the country has worked to advance U.S. interests
“in a non-biased, non-partisan, objective and transparent manner.” The
letter claimed U.S. government assistance has not funded partisan
political activities in Macedonia, but noted that from 2002 to the
present, USAID had provided three grants to Foundation Open Society –
Macedonia (FOSM).
One of these grants is outlined on the USAID website.
Between 2012 and 2016, USAID gave almost $5 million in taxpayer cash to
FOSM for “The Civil Society Project,” which “aims to empower Macedonian citizens to hold government accountable.” USAID’s website links to www.soros.org.mk, and says the project trained hundreds of young Macedonians “in youth activism and the use of new media instruments.”
The letter from the State Department to Lee said
USAID also recently funded a new Civic Engagement Project which partners
with four organizations, including FOSM. It was not clear how much this
project would cost, but Smith put the figure at $9.5 million.
“The money is very significant, in fact there is
still money in the pipeline, from 2017 to 2021, 9.5 million,” Smith said
in a recent radio interview with the Family Research Council's Tony
Perkins. “It’s one thing to do election monitoring, which is a very
noble cause to make sure there’s free and fair elections, but it’s quite
another thing to be backing parties that Soros and his gang want to see
in control of that country.”
It isn’t the only time Soros has worked with the
State Department. Among the emails of Clinton campaign chairman John
Podesta released by Wikileaks was one from 2011 in which Soros urged Hillary Clinton to take action in Albania over recent demonstrations in the capital of Tirana.
Soros asked Clinton to “bring the full weight of the
international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition
leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone
down public pronouncements” and appoint a senior European official as
mediator.
Within a few days, an envoy was dutifully dispatched.
Former Macedonian PM Gruevski cited the WikiLeaks
emails as proof “[Soros] can go visit top leading American officials
whenever he wants to, arranges meetings day in day out and has
significant influence.”
While Soros has often been a bogeyman for the
American right, the liberal businessman has kept a steady pressure and
funding of left-wing causes within America as well.
“This guy is a spider with lots of webs,” GOP
strategist Brad Blakeman told Fox News' "Strategy Room." “He controls
numerous third-party groups, where he uses his influence. We’ve seen it
internally with Black Lives Matter, the demonstrations taken place after
the inaugural -- this is what he does.”
After violent left-wing activists rioted at Berkeley in protest of a lecture by Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos, The Daily Caller reported
that the main group behind the protests -- Refuse Facism -- was backed
by The Alliance for Global Justice -- which in turn is backed by The
Tides Foundation, a Soros-funded group. Soros also has donated to Media Matters and has been a
major financial contributor to the Center for American Progress, a
liberal think tank founded by Podesta.
President Trump has vowed to hunt down whoever is leaking classified
information about him and his team, and if he succeeds in unmasking the
sources of illegal disclosures, they could face hard time.
Trump himself has been plagued by leaks about his
meeting schedule and phone calls to heads of state. But the most
damaging leaks to his month-old administration have been those that cost
retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn his post as national security adviser.
Flynn had to resign after information came out about his December phone
call to a Russian ambassador.
Flynn had to step down after leaks exposed his talks with a Russian diplomat.
(Associated Press)
Trump pulled the plug on Flynn for misleading Vice
President Pence about the substance of the call, but said the discussion
itself was not improper. It was the current or former government
officials who he suspects turned classified information over to the
press that broke the law, the president said.
" ... the leak environment has just kicked into hyper drive.”
- Thomas Dupree, former deputy assistant attorney general
“The real scandal here is that classified information
is illegally given out by ‘intelligence’ like candy,” Trump tweeted
this week. “Very un-American!”
In recent years, even leakers who claimed to be
whistle blowers and cloaked their motives in patriotism have found the
law takes a dim view of their activities. Trump on Thursday said the
Justice Department will look into the issue, and it is a good bet that
Flynn’s replacement, who has not yet been named, will also be charged
with rooting out loose-lipped bureaucrats.
“Leaks are prevalent in Washington, [but] I think
what makes this different is the leak environment has just kicked into
hyper drive,” Thomas Dupree, former deputy assistant attorney general,
told Fox News. “In the first few weeks of this administration, we have
seen a multitude of leaks on a variety of subjects – from national
security to immigration, to the conversation that Flynn had with the
Russians – it’s just every direction.”
Chelsea Manning served hard time, but her sentence was commuted by President Obama.
(AP Photo/US Army)
While some may see leaks as part of the Capitol Hill
game, and “whistleblowers” to be admired, what’s happening now seems to
have moved beyond giving background information to reporters and into
the realm of criminality.
Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the
House Oversight Committee, and Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob
Goodlatte, R-Va., have written to the Department of Justice Inspector
General requesting an official probe into how classified information has
been handled.
“The release of classified information can, by
definition, have grave effects on national security,” Chaffetz wrote in
the letter.
Chaffetz says national security is at risk.
(Associated Press)
Any leakers who are exposed could face serious time in prison.
“They [the penalties] can be pretty serious,” said
Dupree “There are a number of provisions in the federal, criminal
statutes – Title 18 and elsewhere – that provide everything from fines,
to even jail time, for people who leak classified, highly sensitive,
national security information.”
Some recent examples:
Chelsea Manning, who was sentenced to in 2013 to 35 years in prison
for providing more than 700,000 government files to WikiLeaks.
Manning’s sentence was later commuted by President Obama.
Jeffrey A. Sterling, who was sentenced to 3 and ½ years in prison
for disclosing national defense information and obstructing justice
after disclosing classified information to a New York Times reporter.
Shamai K. Leibowitz, a linguist for the FBI, who was sentenced to 20 months in prison for leaking secret documents to a blogger.
Although suspicion has swirled around a handful of
former Obama administration insiders, no one has been identified as a
leaker of information damaging to Trump. And none of the leaks
themselves have been proven illegal. But Trump, who vowed during his
campaign to “drain the swamp,” is finding the first order of business is
plugging leaks.
Vice President Pence on Saturday worked to assure NATO allies that
the United States would be “unwavering” in its commitment to the
trans-Atlantic alliance.
Pence, in his first overseas trip as vice president,
told the Munich Security Conference that President Donald Trump intends
to "stand with Europe." He sought to calm nervous European allies who
remain concerned about Russian aggression and have been alarmed by the
U.S. president’s positive statements about his Russian counterpart
Vladimir Putin.
"Today, on behalf of President Trump, I bring you
this assurance: The United States of America strongly supports NATO and
will be unwavering in its commitment to our trans-Atlantic alliance,"
Pence said. MCCAIN IN GERMANY SAYS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN ‘DISARRAY’
During his address to foreign diplomats and security
officials also sought to reassure international partners who worry that
Trump may pursue isolationist tendencies.
Pence said the U.S. would demand that Russia honor a
2015 peace deal agreed upon in Minsk, Belarus, to end violence in
eastern Ukraine between government forces and Russia-backed separatists.
"Know this: The United States will continue to hold
Russia accountable, even as we search for new common ground which as you
know President Trump believes can be found," Pence said.
Pence met afterward with German Chancellor Angela
Merkel, who addressed the conference just before the vice president.
Merkel stressed the need to maintain international alliances and told
the audience, with Pence seated a few feet away, that NATO is "in the
American interest."
The vice president’s comments come just weeks after
Trump called NATO obsolete, according to a Bloomberg Politics reports
about an interview the then-president elect gave to a German paper.
“It’s obsolete, first because it was designed many,
many years ago,” Trump said. “Secondly, countries aren’t paying what
they should” and NATO “didn’t deal with terrorism.”
On Saturday, Pence said the U.S. would demand that
Russia honor a 2015 peace agreement aimed to end fighting in Ukraine
between government forces and Russian-backed separatists.
"Know this: The United States will continue to hold
Russia accountable, even as we search for new common ground which as you
know President Trump believes can be found," Pence said.
Pence also reinforced the Trump administration's message that NATO members must spend more on defense.
NATO's 28-member countries committed in 2014 to
spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense within a
decade. But only the U.S. and four other members of the post-World War
II military coalition are meeting the standard, Pence said.
Failure to meet the commitment, he said, "erodes the very foundation of our alliance."
"Let me be clear on this point: The president of the
United States expects our allies to keep their word, to fulfill this
commitment and, for most, that means the time has come to do
more," Pence said.
James Jeffrey, a U.S. ambassador to Iraq during the
Obama administration, said Pence looked "like an adult.” The question is
will Trump listen to him?"
The visit, which will include a stop in Brussels on
Sunday and Monday, comes amid worries in Europe about Russian aggression
and Trump's relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Pence has also scheduled meetings Saturday with the
leaders of the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and with
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko — countries dealing with the threat
of Russian incursion. Pence also planned to meet with Turkish Prime
Minister Binali Yildirim.
"The vice president has sent reassuring messages
through his own engagement but that hasn't been enough to dispel the
concerns that you see in many parts of Europe," Jeff Rathke, a senior
fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said.
"There are such grave challenges that the U.S. and Europe faces that it
only heightens the desire for additional clarity from Washington."