Presumptuous Politics

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Former Obama campaign manager says 'all public pollsters should be shot'


Jim Messina, a former campaign manager for Barack Obama, apparently isn't one to mince words.
During an appearance Friday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Messina spoke about the irrelevance of public polls so early in an election year, Mediaite reported.
Then he underscored the point to host Joe Scarborough.
"Joe, you know how I feel about public polls," he said. "I think all public pollsters should be shot.”
Messina said there were other, more important yardsticks at this point to determine a candidate's viability.
“What you care more about is passion and intensity,” he said. “When I ran President Obama’s campaign, the number I looked at every day was intensity. Are my voters more motivated than Republican voters?”
He said in the interview that “our voters are more intense,” the report said.
Messina said recent Democratic electoral performances in Missouri, New Jersey and Virginia demonstrate that intensity levels are in the Democrats,' the Washington Times reported.
A recent column by Fox News contributor Jen Kerns, however, may have revealed the source of Messina's frustration.
According to Kerns, new polling shows that Democrats have lost a recent 15-point lead over Republicans, dropping to only a 2-point lead heading toward the 2018 midterms.

California school science project that connected race and IQ is pulled after complaints


A science fair project at a California high school faced criticism earlier this week after it compared race and IQ levels in connection to participation in an elite program at the school, The Sacramento Bee reported Saturday.
The project, titled “Race and IQ,” was put together by a C.K. McClatchy High School student who is part of the school’s elite Humanities and International Studies Program. It was displayed in the fair on Monday, the outlet said.
In comparing intelligence levels, the project reportedly questioned whether particular races were smart enough for the school’s magnet program and whether a racial disparity was justified.
“If the average IQs of blacks, Southeast Asians, and Hispanics are lower than the average IQs of non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians, then the racial disproportionality in (HISP) is justified,” the hypothesis said, according to the outlet.
HISP, according to The Bee, is a separate program at the school that is meant to encourage cultural awareness and helps to provide students with different perspectives on historic moments.
Of about 500 students, there are a dozen African-Americans, 80 Latino students and about 100 Asian-American students, according to data from the school district that was obtained by the outlet. The program has reportedly been criticized for its lack of racial and ethnic diversity.
The student who conducted the experiment was not spoken to or identified by The Bee.
To test the proposed theory, the student had a variety of unidentified teenagers with different racial backgrounds take an internet IQ test, the outlet said.
The project’s final conclusion reportedly found that “the lower average IQs of blacks, Southeast Asians, and nonwhite Hispanics means that they are not as likely as non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians to be accepted into a more academically rigorous program such as HISP,” the report said. “Therefore the racial disproportionality of HISP is justified.”
After complaints from students, parents and faculty, the project was removed from the science fair on Wednesday, the outlet said, and the district is currently investigating the incident, Alex Barrios, said the spokesman for Sacramento Unified district.
“We are looking into the appropriate response to a situation like this,” Barrios told The Bee. “We understand it concerns a lot of people and doesn’t reflect our culture here.”
In a Thursday email to parents, the school’s principal Peter Lambert said they were taking the “incident very seriously” and noted that the school strived to “promote and embrace an inclusive environment and way of thinking which excludes any form of discrimination.”
Chrysanthe Vidal, a senior high school student in the program, told The Bee, “I think that a lot of people, especially of color, are really hurt and upset by this.”

College Republicans' Patriot Prayer rally disrupted by counter-protesters

Torn pieces of an American flag lie on the ground at the University of Washington, Feb. 10, 2018.


Five people were arrested as fights broke out and at least one American flag was burned Saturday after a college Republican rally in Seattle drew counter-protesters.
College Republicans at the University of Washington had invited members of Patriot Prayer, a group in Vancouver, Wash., to speak in the university's Red Square for a "freedom rally," the Seattle Times reported.
The goals were to bring conservatives together and promote free-speech rights, College Republicans President Chevy Swanson told the Times. As the event got underway, supporters chanted "U-S-A!, U-S-A!," and signs included one that read, "We died for liberty not socialism."
But more than 1,000 counter-protesters showed up to oppose the event.
"I learned that they thought my vote was a hate crime,” Kathryn Townsend, who said she voted for Donald Trump in 2016, told Seattle's Q13 Fox.
"I learned that they thought my vote was a hate crime."
Some counter-protesters voiced their goals.
“We’re here to fight back against the far right and fascism on our campus,” one counter-protester said.
Added another: “I’m not a fan of the president, and these people are fans. So I want to come out here and say this is not OK. And what you’re doing is not OK.”
After several skirmishes broke out, police responded with pepper spray. University of Washington police said those arrested were charged with disorderly conduct.
No officers were injured, they said.
University officials were worried about the potential for violence at the rally, and the school's president had warned students to avoid the area.

Saturday, February 10, 2018

Stock Market Cartoons 2018





Let the games begin! A week of Olympic-sized bias on stocks and dictators, and assorted media failures


The Winter Olympics have begun in PyeongChang in South Korea, but unfortunately for American journalists, media bias is not an Olympic sport. If it was, they’d be breaking records for most medals won.
Instead, members of the U.S. news media will have to settle for beating up on President Trump as compensation. But since it is the Olympics, let’s pick medal winners.
The Gold Medal of Bias goes to horrific network coverage of the stock market downturn. The broadcast networks spent 2017 burying good economic news to the point where they failed to report 75 percent of all stock market highs when they happened. You read that right. Sixty-two out of 82 stock market highs didn’t make it on the evening news of ABC, CBS or NBC.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average, you’ll recall, was on quite a run up. It began 2017 at 19,762, defying Paul Krugman-like predictions of economic collapse. One year after the election, the Dow Jones Industrial Average witnessed “its biggest post-Election Day gain in more than 70 years,” according to CNBC.
Yet Americans saw little of it.
That included milestone records like the Dow hitting 21,000, 22,000, 23,000, 24,000, 25,000 and 26,000. At one point, “ABC World News Tonight” skipped like a broken turntable, missing 30 records in a row – nearly a 3,000-point market gain from August to January.
But when the Dow started to drop, the media hyped it like they had images of 1929 dancing in their heads. After a big drop Monday, media chaos ensued.
The Washington Post referred to an 8-percent drop as “free fall.” Irresponsible Vox called the drop “this week’s stock market crash.” (This is a prime example of what happens when news organizations hire people who don’t even recall the last stock market collapse in 2007-2009).
The coverage was so incredibly uninformed and awful that the Poynter Institute, which promotes journalism education, published a piece headlined: “Journalists: Don't feed the stock market panic.”
“You will do your readers/viewers/listeners a disservice if you scare them with uninformed headlines,” senior faculty member Al Tompkins wrote in the article.
He might as well have saved himself the trouble. The media were unhinged, even predicting a “recession.”
It’s a weird thing watching media types practically celebrate a market downturn just to get at President Trump. But that’s 2018. Remember, 2019 will be worse and 2020 will be unimaginably bad.
CNN Snares The Silver: Sometimes bias is a team sport, like the Jamaican bobsled team, with less heart, humor or style. Think Jim Acosta, April Ryan, Brian Karem and more. It seems that all it takes to get a job on CNN these days is be anti-Trump. CNN is diverse. It will take anti-Trump voices from the right or the left – and even from the discontented ranks of law enforcement.
On Feb. 2, former FBI Supervisory Special Agent Josh Campbell wrote an op-ed headlined “Why I Am Leaving the F.B.I.” for The New York Times. He wrote that he was joining “the growing chorus of people who believe that the relentless attacks on the bureau undermine not just America’s premier law enforcement agency but also the nation’s security.”
That was Friday. By Monday, it was announced that he had been named CNN’s new law enforcement analyst. It’s possible that CNN staff simply read the op-ed and hired him on the spot. Or perhaps he had been negotiating with the network for some time. We might never know, but it casts a pall on all of CNN’s recent FBI reporting and immediately undercuts the credibility of CNN’s new anti-Trump expert.
That alone is probably bronze worthy. But CNN’s team did so much more this week. Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta attacked Trump Chief of Staff John Kelly for daring to criticize so-called Dreamers – young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children who are seeking protection from deportation. Acosta called Kelly’s remark “one of a long line of offensive comments coming out of the White House.” That’s your neutral CNN journalist.
CNN Political Analyst Brian Karem pretended Trump hates immigrants and argued that “every immigrant in this country isn’t a killer and a thug and a thief.”
And, in case that wasn’t enough, the Senior Diplomatic Correspondent Michelle Kosinski retweeted a famously phony North Korean satirical account. I might let this one go if the network weren’t so unforgiving of the failings of others. That, and the fact that Kosinski is famous for one of the most bogus news videos in modern times.
Back in 2005, when Kosinski was working for NBC News, the “Today” show aired her report on a massive New Jersey flood – or so viewers initially thought. As she was paddled through the flood, a couple pedestrians walked by, revealing the waters were only a couple inches deep.
Parade Coverage Grabs The Bronze: “I love a parade.” More than 85 years after that song was released it still resonates – everywhere but with journalists. All it took for the media, which promote the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and the Rose Parade, to turn anti-marching was for President Trump to suggest we needed a parade to honor the U.S. military and its heroic service members.
Those opposed to troops trooping filled the airwaves like ticker tape. NBC Pentagon Correspondent Hans Nichols compared the idea to the old Soviet Union and to present day North Korea in one breath.
“For the most part, U.S. presidents have avoided displays of military power that are often associated with the former Soviet Union’s Red Square celebrations, or more recently, Kim Jong Un’s parades in North Korea,” Nichols told the audience in a nice, one-sided way.
CNN (them again) “New Day” Co-host Chris Cuomo repeated the identical talking point, saying it is “the whole deal that you usually see out of North Korea.”
Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin added during a panel discussion on CNN that “we're getting more North Korean every day in this country.”
Fellow CNN Host Don Lemon, who hasn’t appeared noticeably drunk recently, even asked: “Would there be nuclear weapons, like some countries?”
Honorable Mention, Who Gets The Tin Medals?: In true Olympic propaganda spirit, NBC did its best to ignore the fact that North Korea is a giant prison camp where there are no human rights, run by a maniacal and murderous dictator. (NBC is running the Olympics. PR fails must come with the contract.) The “reporting” discredited all those involved.
The “Today” show featured Correspondent Keir Simmons promoting his “week inside North Korea.” Only, instead of spending days showing concentration camps, poverty, starvation and psychotic tyranny, he rode bumper cars in a Pyongyang amusement park.
Simmons then interviewed anti-American North Koreans and one boy explained how “America gave unfathomable pain to our people.” That left out how North Korea tried to conquer the South in the Korean War that resulted in millions of dead and wounded.
That was about as tone deaf as Director Quentin Tarantino’s defense of convicted child rapist Roman Polanski. When asked about Polanski by radio shock jock Howard Stern, Tarantino inexplicably became a rape truther. “That’s statutory rape, you know, he had sex with a minor. Alright, that’s not rape,” he argued, because it wasn’t “violent, throwing them down.”

Pennsylvania GOP submits new plan for congressional map, meeting court deadline



Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf has until Feb. 15 to decide whether to accept a proposal submitted by state Republicans for redrawing the state's congressional map.  (Reuters)

Leading state Republicans in Pennsylvania on Friday night submitted a proposal to Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf for redrawing the state’s congressional map -- just hours before a court-ordered deadline.
State Democrats, however, called on Wolf to reject it.
The state’s Supreme Court had ordered Jan. 22 that a new map of the state's 18 congressional districts be drawn after ruling that the current map -- created in 2011 by the state's GOP-controlled General Assembly -- was unconstitutionally gerrymandered to favor Republicans.
The GOP dominates Pennsylvania's congressional delegation, 12-5, with one seat currently vacant. Republicans also lead both chambers of the state's General Assembly: They lead the Senate, 34 seats to 16, and the House, 121 seats to 82.
Friday's proposal came after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal of the state high court's 5-2 ruling earlier this week, claiming the current district lines violate the state’s constitution, Reuters reported.
Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, and House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, who submitted the proposed new map, said in a joint statement that it “complies fully” with the court’s request.
The new proposal keeps more municipalities and counties within a single congressional district, PennLive.com reported.
"It's decent map. It's good. And most importantly, it hits all the constitutional markers," Drew Crompton, chief of staff to Scarnati, told PennLive.com.
It was unclear Friday if Republicans sought or received any help from Democrats in preparing the new map.
Wolf said he would review the proposal, but a spokesman for the governor seemed to suggest it wouldn’t pass.
Wolf has until Thursday to decide whether to approve the proposal, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. If an agreement cannot be reached next week, the state’s Supreme Court said it would create a new political map.

White House seeks revisions to Dems' FISA rebuttal memo, halting release


The White House on Friday told Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee to redraft their rebuttal to a controversial GOP memo alleging government surveillance abuse during the 2016 campaign, saying sensitive details need to be stripped out before the document can be made public.
The message was sent to the committee Friday in a letter from White House Counsel Don McGahn.
"Although the president is inclined to declassify the February 5th Memorandum, because the Memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," McGahn wrote.
"However, given the public interest in transparency in these unprecedented circumstances, the President has directed that Justice Department personnel be available to give technical assistance to the Committee, should the Committee wish to revise the February 5th Memorandum to mitigate the risks identified by the Department," McGahn continued. "The President encourages the Committee to undertake these efforts. The Executive Branch stands ready to review any subsequent draft of the February 5th Memorandum for declassification at the earliest opportunity."
A letter signed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray accompanied McGahn's response. In that accompanying letter, the two men noted "a version of the document that identifies, in highlighted text, information the release of which would present such concerns in light of longstanding principles regarding the protection of intelligence sources and methods, ongoing investigations, and other similarly sensitive information.
"We have further identified, in red boxes, the subset of such information for which national security or law enforcement concerns are especially significant. Our determinations have taken into account the information previously declassified by the President as communicated in a letter to HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes dated February 2, 2018."
Earlier this week, the House Intelligence Committee approved the release of the Democrats' memo, giving Trump five days to consider whether he should block publication for national security reasons.
For the moment, the White House letter halts the release.
Here's how U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Inteligence Committee, responded to the president's decision:
“The President’s double standard when it comes to transparency is appalling," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement after the release of McGahn's letter. "The rationale for releasing the Nunes memo, transparency, vanishes when it could show information that’s harmful to him. Millions of Americans are asking one simple question: What is he hiding?”
Added House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.: "America’s intelligence and national security are being politicized. Why won’t the President put our country before his personal and political interests?”
Democrats have been expected to use their memo to try to undermine Republican claims that the FBI and DOJ relied heavily on the anti-Trump dossier to get a warrant to spy on a Trump associate -- and omitted key information about the document's political funding. Democrats claim the GOP memo was misleading.
"We think this will help inform the public of the many distortions and inaccuracies in the majority memo," California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the panel, said Monday.
But it had been expected that the Democrats' memo might raise red flags during the review period.
A source who read the FISA rebuttal memo told Fox News earlier this week that it is filled with sources and methods taken from the original documents. The source argued that this was done to strategically force the White House to either deny release of the memo or substantially redact it, so that Democrats could accuse the White House of making redactions for political reasons.
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE APPROVES RELEASE OF DEMS’ REBUTTAL TO FISA MEMO
U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., a member of the committee, said during an interview this week on Fox News’ “The Story with Martha MacCallum” that Democrats “are politically smart enough to put things in the memo” that have to be redacted.
“Therefore, it creates this belief that there's something being hidden from the American people,” Gowdy said.
Last Friday, Republicans on the intelligence committee released their much-anticipated memo from Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
It also said the FBI and DOJ “ignored or concealed” dossier author Christopher Steele’s “anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations" when asking the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for permission to eavesdrop on former Trump adviser Carter Page.
Democrats have been pushing back against those claims and accusing Republicans of exaggerations.
CRIMINAL REFERRAL BACKS UP NUNES ON DOSSIER CLAIMS, AS DEMS PUSH REBUTTAL MEMO
Earlier this week, a newly released version of a letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., appeared to support key claims from the GOP memo.
The surveillance applications, they said in a criminal referral for Steele sent in early January to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, “relied heavily on Mr. Steele’s dossier claims.”
Further, they said the application “failed to disclose” funding from  the Clinton campaign and DNC.
The referral also helped explain a point of contention in recent days, after Nunes seemed to admit on “Fox & Friends” that the FBI application did include a “footnote” acknowledging some political origins of the dossier. This admission helped fuel Democratic claims that the dossier’s political connection was not concealed from the surveillance court as alleged.
According to Grassley and Graham’s referral, the FBI “noted to a vaguely limited extent the political origins of the dossier” in a footnote that said the information was compiled at the direction of a law firm “who had hired an ‘identified U.S. person’ – now known as Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS.” A subsequent passage in the letter is redacted. But they said the DNC and Clinton campaign were not mentioned.
Republicans have seized on the Nunes document to make the accusation of widespread anti-Trump bias at the top of the FBI and DOJ that sparked inquiries into Trump campaign relations with Russia during the election.
The president has repeatedly said there was “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia. The White House responded to the Republican memo last week by saying it “raises serious concerns about the integrity of decisions made at the highest levels of the Department of Justice and the FBI to use the government’s most intrusive surveillance tools against American citizens.”

Bill Maher tries to rain on Trump's parade

Comedian and TV host Bill Maher blasted Trump over his plan for an extravagant military parade on his show Friday night. 
Thanks to President Donald Trump’s recent call for a military parade in Washington, comedian Bill Maher had some material for Friday's edition of his HBO show.
The host of “Real Time With Bill Maher” said there was one item Trump still hadn't checked off on the “Dictator’s Checklist” that Maher introduced last season, Deadline reported.
“Military costume,” Maher said.
Mocking things military is nothing new for Maher. In 2005, he referred to those who enlist in the armed forces as "low-lying fruit," a remark that an Alabama congressman responded, "borders on treason."
This time, Maher’s comic bit followed a recent story in the Washington Post that the Pentagon was preparing plans to meet Trump's request for the military parade. The president reportedly said he got the idea after attending France’s Bastille Day parade last July.
Meanwhile, Maher also made a “list” for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the Wrap reported.
Titled “25 Things You Didn’t Know About Me,” the list mocked Nunes, who released a memo earlier this month that detailed alleged surveillance abuses by FBI and Justice Department officials.
“When they told me they were putting me on the Intelligence Committee my first reaction was, ‘Ha-ha, guys, good one,’” one read.
Ha-ha, Bill. Good one.

Friday, February 9, 2018

Russian Hillary Cartoons





Pelosi Tells Story of Grandson Wishing He Had 'Brown Skin and Brown Eyes'

Idiot

During an extended speech on the House floor Wednesday morning, where she read a long list of profiles of DACA recipients, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was reminded of her own grandson.

Pelosi, who noted her Italian heritage, said her grandson comes from Irish, English, "whatever, whatever" descent. She added that he is a "mix." Pelosi shared that when her grandson blew out the candles at his sixth birthday party he made a wish that he would have "brown skin and brown eyes" like his Hispanic friend Antonio.


NANCY PELOSI: I'm reminded of my own grandson. He is Irish, English, whatever, whatever, and Italian-American, he is a mix. But he looks more the other [Italian] side of the family, shall we say.
And when he had his sixth birthday... he had a very close friend whose name is Antonio, he's from Guatemala. And he has beautiful tan skinned, beautiful brown eyes, and this was a proud day for me, because when my grandson blew out the candles on his cake, they said did you make a wish?

He said yes, he made a wish. What is your wish? I wish I had brown skin and brown eyes like Antonio.

So beautiful. So beautiful. The beauty is in the mix. The face of the future for our country is all-American. And that has many versions.

CartoonDems