An Orange County registrar pop-up voting location is seen at
the Golden West College in Huntington Beach, Calif., Sunday, Nov. 4,
2018. (AP Photo/Amy Taxin)
A minor change in California’s election
laws may had a major effect on last month’s midterm elections that saw
Democrats steamroll their Republican rivals and claim all but seven of
the Golden State’s 53 House seats.
Despite holding substantial
leads on Election Day, many Republican candidates in California saw
their advantage shrink, and then disappear, as late arriving Democratic
votes were counted in the weeks following the election. While no hard
evidence is available, many observers point to the Democrats use of
“ballot harvesting” as a key to their success in the elections.
“Anecdotally
there was a lot of evidence that ballot harvesting was going on,” Neal
Kelley, the registrar for voters in Southern California’s Orange County,
told Fox News.
In Orange County – once seen as a Republican
stronghold in the state– every House seat went to a Democrat after an
unprecedented “250,000” vote-by-mail drop-offs were counted, the San
Francisco Chronicle reported.
“People were carrying in stacks of
100 and 200 of them. We had had multiple people calling to ask if these
people were allowed to do this,” Kelley said.
Two years ago,
California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law AB1921, which legalized the
so-called practice of “ballot harvesting.” Previously, only a family
member or someone living in the same household was permitted to drop off
mail ballots for a voter, but the new allowed anyone – including
political operatives – to collect and return them for a voter.
California
Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez did not respond to Fox News’
request for comment, but in the past Democrats in the state argued that
the bill, which was passed on a party line vote, was meant to make it
easier for people to vote.
But following the drubbing they took in
the midterms, some Republican leaders in Washington have expressed
confusion over what happened in California.
“We were only down 26
seats (nationally) the night of the election and three weeks later, we
lost basically every California race,” outgoing House Speaker Paul Ryan,
R-Wisc., told the Washington Post. “Point being, when you have
candidates that win the absentee ballot vote, win the day of the vote,
and then lose three weeks later because of provisionals, that’s really
bizarre.”
Ryan added: “When you win the absentee ballots and you
win the in-person vote, where I come from, you win the election…I’m not
saying there’s anything nefarious about it, because I just don’t know,
but we believed we were up about six seats in California the night of
the election, now I think we lost just about every single one of those.”
While Ryan may have been taken off guard by the system in California, the state’s GOP was not.
“To
say we were caught flat-footed by this is just not true,” Matt Fleming,
a spokesman for the California GOP, told Fox News. “We were well aware
of this, we even did it ourselves, we pay attention to election laws.”
Echoing
Ryan, Fleming blamed the GOP’s losses in California on changing
demographics in the state, a large cash infusion for Democratic
candidates and a heightened enthusiasm among the Democratic base in the
run-up to the election.
“Democrats’ desire to send a message to
the president and the blue wave that occurred everywhere but in the US
Senate, really affected the outcome,” he said.
Democrats say that ballot harvesting was only part of a larger ground game they employed to help win over voters in California.
“We
beat Republicans on the ground, fair and square,” Katie Merrill, a
Democratic consultant, told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Many of the
field plans included [ballot harvesting] as an option to deliver voters
or their ballots” to the polls.
In one anecdote, Democratic
volunteers in Orange County visited a home four times to speak with the
owner’s 18-year-old daughter – a no preference voter – to see if she
wanted them to pick up her ballot for her.
“We were not wasting time talking to people who weren’t going to vote for Democrats,” Merrill said.
Despite
being stung by the Democratic ground game and ballot harvesting moves,
some Republicans admitted they were – at least a little bit – impressed
by how the Democrats pulled off their near sweep of the House in
California.
“I have a little bit of professional admiration for
how well the Democrats executed their plan,” Dale Neugebauer, a longtime
Republican strategist, told the Chronicle.
“The Democrats are
creating a new, highly efficient tool to turn out voters,” Neugebauer
added. “If Republicans can’t find a way to match it, we’re going to lose
more elections all over the country.”
The
Bush family contacted the White House this past summer saying that
President Trump would be welcome at George H.W. Bush’s funeral and
assured Trump that the focus would be on the 41st U.S. president’s life
rather than their disagreements, The Washington Post reported, citing a former administration official.
"This
will be about the celebration of the noble public service that George
H.W. Bush gave. It’s not going to be about anybody else. I don’t think
it’s going to be about Trump," a former Bush associate told Politico.
A
person close to the funeral preparations told The Post that the tone of
Wednesday’s funeral at the Washington National Cathedral will reflect
the sense of propriety of Bush, who "wouldn't want anyone there to feel
uncomfortable, including the incumbent president."
“If anybody at
any time knew anything about the 41st president of the United States,
they would completely and totally understand that he would welcome the
current occupant 100 percent,” an aide in the office of the former
president told the publication. “This is the way the country says
goodbye to presidents.”
Trump had the final say over important
funeral details, the person said, including providing Air Force One to
carry the former president’s body from Texas to Washington for the
funeral and back to Texas on Thursday for another service and burial.
The
Trump White House has accommodated all the Bush family’s requests for
the state funeral. The Bush family will be able to stay at Blair House,
the official guesthouse across the street from the White House, a person
familiar with the planning told The Post.
First lady Melania
Trump, who represented the White House at former first lady Barbara
Bush’s funeral in April, was struck by the Bush family’s graciousness
toward her, one official told The Post. She conveyed that to the
president, who did not attend that funeral, the official said.
Eric Trump took to Twitter late Monday to call out White House counselor Kellyanne Conway’s husband George Conway.
President Trump's son, Eric Trump, took to
Twitter late Monday to call out White House counselor Kellyanne Conway’s
husband George Conway-- a fierce critic of President Trump—who earlier
suggested that a tweet from the president was tantamount to witnesses tampering.
Eric
Trump did not specify what prompted the tweet, but wrote, “Of all the
ugliness in politics, the utter disrespect George Conway shows toward
his wife, her career, place of work, and everything she has fought SO
hard to achieve, might top them all.”
The rare public rebuke came
after Conway's husband-- an attorney-- responded to a tweet from the
president praising the longtime Republican operative Roger Stone. Stone said in an interview
he would never testify against the president. Stone told ABC on Sunday
that he'd be forced to "make things up, and I’m not going to do that."
The
president praised Stone’s comment in a tweet, saying, that his longtime
ally will "not be forced by a rogue and out of control prosecutor to
make up lies and stories about "President Trump." Nice to know that some
people still have guts!”
Conway's husband responded on Twitter to
the president's praise for Stone and referenced the statutes of
tampering with a witness and obstruction of justice.
George
Conway responded to Eric Trump's tweet by retweeting a user who wrote,
"Of all the ugliness in politics, the utter disrespect the Trumps show
toward the rule of law, the presidency and its place of work, and
everything this nation has fought SO hard to achieve might top them all.
Donald Trump is(sic) terrible person and frankly his actions are
horrible."
The Washington Post reported last month
that Conway's husband told a podcast that the Republican Party has
become a "personality cult," and he would prefer to move to Australia
than vote for Trump. Conway was asked recently about her husband’s
criticism of Trump and said, "It doesn’t affect me or my job at all."
Her husband has also downplayed their differences of opinions, according to the Post.
"If
I had a nickel for everybody in Washington who disagrees with their
spouse on something that happens in this town, I wouldn’t be on this
podcast. I’d be probably on a beach somewhere," he said.
President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani took to the airwaves Sunday to
question the ethics and tactics of special counsel Robert Mueller, who
is investigating Russian interference in the presidential election and
possible coordination with the Trump campaign.
“This isn’t a
search for the truth. It’s a witch hunt,” Giuliani told host John
Catsimatidis in an interview with AM 970 in New York. “This is what is
wrong with these special prosecutors and independent counsels. They
think they are God.”
Giuliani added: “They seem to want to
prosecute people at any cost, including the cost of ethical behavior and
the rights of people.”
President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani, far left, is questioning
the ethics and tactics of special counsel Robert Mueller, second from
right, who is investigating Russian interference in the presidential
election and possible coordination with the Trump campaign, in light of
the surprise plea agreement Thursday with Michael Cohen, Trump's former
lawyer.
(AP, File)
Giuliani accused Mueller
of crossing boundaries for the purpose of “intimidating” Trump’s allies
into saying “what he believes (is) his version of the truth,” in light
of the surprise plea agreement Thursday with Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer.
Cohen
confessed in his guilty plea that he lied to Congress about a Moscow
real estate deal he pursued on Trump’s behalf during the heat of the
2016 Republican campaign. He said he lied to be consistent with Trump’s
“political messaging.”
Cohen said he discussed the proposal with
Trump on multiple occasions and with members of the president’s family,
according to documents filed by Mueller.
There is no clear link in
the court filings between Cohen’s statements and Mueller’s central
question of whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. And,
nothing said in court on Thursday, or in associated court filings,
addressed whether Trump or his aides had directed Cohen to mislead
Congress.
Still, the
case underscored how Trump’s business entity, the Trump Organization,
was negotiating business in Moscow well beyond the point that had been
previously acknowledged, and that associates of the president were mining Russian connections during the race.
“They
obviously exerted a lot of pressure on him. Mr. Cohen unfortunately has
a history of significant lies in the past,” Giuliani added in the
interview Sunday.
Giuliani previously had said that Trump’s
business organization voluntarily gave Mueller the documents cited in
the guilty plea “because there was nothing to hide.”
Trump
on Thursday called Cohen a “weak person,” who was lying to get a
lighter sentence, and stressed that the real estate deal at issue was
never a secret and never executed.
“There would be nothing wrong
if I did do it,” Trump said of pursuing the project. “I was running my
business while I was campaigning. There was a good chance that I
wouldn’t have won, in which case I would have gone back into the
business, and why should I lose lots of opportunities?”
He said the primary reason he didn’t pursue it was “I was focused on running for president.”
Cohen
is the first person charged by Mueller with lying to Congress, an
indication the special counsel is prepared to treat that offense as
seriously as lying to federal agents and a warning shot to dozens of
others who have appeared before lawmakers. DEMOCRAT BLAMES TRUMP FOR GM PLANT SHUTDOWNS
Cohen
told two congressional committees last year that the talks about the
tower project ended in January 2016, a lie he said was an act of loyalty
to Trump. In fact, the negotiations continued until June 2016, Cohen
acknowledged.
Speaking of Mueller's team, Giuliani said: “They
want (Manafort) to give certain forms of evidence that would implicate
the president in things that Mr. Manafort says are untrue.”
“And
they are pressuring him, and creating a real risk that the man might
commit perjury,” he said to Catsimatidis. “This kind of pressure can
create the risk of tainted testimony.”
Bruce
Springsteen-- the famous liberal rocker-- believes that President
Donald Trump is headed for a second term at the White House.
In a Sunday interview with the British newspaper, The Sunday Times,
the 69-year-old singer-songwriter said he hasn’t seen a democratic
contender who could effectively win over blue-collar voters by speaking
Trump’s language.
“I don’t see anyone out there at the moment …
the man who can beat Trump, or the woman who can beat Trump,” Spring
told the paper. “You need someone who can speak some of the same
language [as Trump] … and the Democrats don’t have an obvious, effective
presidential candidate.”
Springsteen expressed his disappointment that there wasn’t a stronger “blue wave” during the November midterms.
“I’d
like to have seen a much more full-throated [rejection] of the past two
years,” he said. “The country is very divided right now — there are a
lot of people drinking the snake oil. So it’s a very difficult time here
in the States.”
Springsteen’s comments come less than a week after an interview with Esquire in which he called the president a “deeply damaged at his core” and “dangerous.”
Trump
“has no interest in united the country, really, and actually has an
interest in doing the opposite and dividing us, which he does on an
almost daily basis,” Springsteen told the magazine. “So that’s simply a
crime against humanity, as far as I’m concerned.”
When asked by
The Times if he’d consider running for president, Springsteen replied.
“[N]ot in any way, in any form. I’d be terrible.”
President Donald Trump meets with China's President Xi Jinping
during their bilateral meeting at the G20 Summit in Buenos Aires,
Argentina.
(AP)
President Donald Trump on
Sunday announced that China had agreed to rollback its tariffs on
American automobiles below 40 percent.
“China has agreed to reduce
and remove tariffs on cars coming into China from the U.S. Currently
the tariff is 40%,” Trump wrote on Twitter.
The announcement comes
a day after Trump sat down with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20
Summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina for negotiation talks and dinner.
Earlier this year, China’s tariff’s on U.S. imported automobiles stood at 15 percent from 25 percent, Politico reported. It then raised tariff rates to 40 percent amid the escalating trade war with the U.S.
The
two leaders reportedly agreed on a 90-day cease-fire, during which
Trump will delay the scheduled U.S. tariff increase while the world’s
two most-powerful economies negotiate over the administration’s
complaints that China systematically steals trade secrets and forces the
U.S. to hand over sensitive technology as the price of admission to the
vast Chinese market.
In return, China agreed to buy what the
White House called a “not yet agreed upon, but very substantial” amount
of U.S. products to help narrow America’s gaping trade deficit with
China.
The timetable for China’s lowering of tariffs below 40 percent remains unclear.
Three
Northern Virginia men --including one who reportedly celebrated New
Year's Eve in 1999 with the Clintons-- were charged last week for their
alleged roles in a scheme to defraud the Pentagon after receiving an $8
billion contract in 2012 to provide food and supplies to troops in
Afghanistan, the Department of Justice announced.
Federal
prosecutors said the three—all executives connected to Anham FZCO, a
defense contractor based in the United Arab Emirates--- knowingly gave
false estimates of completion dates for a warehouse intended to provide
supplies for troops in Afghanistan in order to win contracts. They
allegedly provided "misleading photographs" to show that the project was
further along than it was.
"Specifically, the indictment alleges
that, in February of 2012, the defendants and others caused Anham
employees to transport construction equipment and materials to the
proposed site of one of the warehouse complexes to create the false
appearance of an active construction site," a Department of Justice statement read.
The
company won the contract in 2011 to build warehouses at Bagram Air
Field, but as the deadline approached, prosecutors said one warehouse
was a concrete slab in the ground, and construction did not yet start on
the second one, Stars and Stripes reported.
Abdul
Huda Farouki, 75, the former Anham CEO; his brother Mazen Farouki, 73;
and Salah Maarouf, 71, pleaded not guilty on Thursday to eight counts
each of fraud and violating sanctions against Iran, according to an
indictment unsealed Thursday. The men were charged in Washington, D.C.
Abdul Huda Farouki and his wife were Washington socialites and donated to the Clinton family charity, The Wall Street Journal reported. The
Washington Post reported that the former CEO celebrated New Year's Eve
with the Clintons in 1999 and was invited to a state dinner. The report
pointed to a Bloomberg article that cited a government audit that found that Anham overbilled the Pentagon $4.4 million.
The
Journal first reported on the company allegedly moving equipment in a
military contract through Iran, a possible violation of sanctions. The
government said that the former CEO fired off an email to a senior
defense official that "falsely claimed" senior management at the company
were unaware of the transshipments.
The company has denied all
charges. Anham reportedly said it helped the U.S. save $1.4 billion by
reducing prices. The company echoed the not guilty pleas and said it is
confident the defendants would be exonerated.
"ANHAM continues to
cooperate with the Justice Department. Nevertheless, the company
continues to believe that the purported violations are without legal
merit," the company said in a statement on its website, the paper
reported.
Their next hearing is Dec. 6.