Counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway responded to critics Monday after formally defying a Hatch Act-related subpoena from the House Oversight Committee.
Her opponents are concerned about her effectiveness at her job and hoped to silence her, Conway said Monday on "Hannity."
"I'm concerned that there's such a weaponization and politicization of this thing called the Hatch Act," she said.
The
Hatch Act limits political activity by federal workers. Congress
approved the Hatch Act in 1939 to limit partisan activity by federal
employees to ensure the government functions fairly and effectively.
The
Office of Special Counsel -- separate from the office formerly run by
Special Counsel Robert Mueller -- opened two cases focused on
allegations Conway violated the Hatch Act by engaging in “both official
and political activity” -- during her media appearances and on her
Twitter account, @KellyannePolls.
The report stated, "Ms. Conway
regularly participated in official media interviews in her capacity as a
White House spokesperson to answer reporters’ questions about the
Administration. Beginning in February 2019, Ms. Conway, during official
media appearances, engaged in a pattern of partisan attacks on several
Democratic Party candidates shortly after they announced their candidacy
for President,” detailing instances involving Sens. Cory Booker
and Elizabeth Warren, and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke.
The OSC
stated that in one Feb. 19 interview on "Fox & Friends," Conway
“insinuated that Senator Booker was ‘sexist’ and a ‘tinny’ ‘motivational
speaker,’” and claimed Warren, D-Mass., was “’lying’” about her
ethnicity.
Conway said that no matter how heavy the pressure is on
her to keep a low profile, she will continue to publicly support the
president's policies.
"They're not going to silence me," she said. "They're not going to take away my First Amendment rights."
Conway also “attacked” O’Rourke for not “thinking the women running are good enough to be President.” Fox News' Brooke Singman contributed to this report
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
agents are being wrongfully criticized and attacked by misinformed or
intentionally misguided people, according to Mark Morgan, the acting CBP
commissioner said.
Law enforcement and the intelligence community
are likely successfully tracking potential threats against the agency
and its infrastructure, Morgan claimed Monday on "The Ingraham Angle."
"It's absolutely dangerous," he said of some of the opposition to the agency's mission of border enforcement.
"I have full confidence that the law enforcement mechanisms and intelligence agencies are watching these groups."
"A lone wolf or violent extremist are very hard to prevent," he said, referring to a 69-year-old Antifa activist shot and killed by Washington state police after attacking an ICE facility in the Evergreen State.
The group Seattle Antifascist Action described assailant
Willem Van Spronsen a "good friend and comrade" who "took a stand
against the fascist detention center in Tacoma" and "became a martyr who
gave his life to the struggle against fascism."
Van Spronsen was armed
with a rifle and incendiary devices when he launched his assault on
the Northwest Detention Center around 4 a.m. Saturday, according to the
Tacoma Police Department.
Employees reported he was throwing 'incendiary devices' and setting
vehicles on fire and the first officers on the scene said he was wearing
a sachet and carrying flares.
In light of van Spronsen's attack, Morgan slammed some of the rhetoric from agency opponents and critics.
"The
rhetoric that's out there from our own elected leaders -- they're
attacking the men and women of ICE, they're attacking the men and women
of CBP," he said.
"It's unjust, it's unfair, it's misinformed, and
outright sometimes, they're just lying to the American people and it's
undoubtedly fueling this."
Of the comparison between border
detention facilities and World War II-era concentration camps, Morgan
said the two are completely different.
"In the concentration camps, the Nazis were killing people. Customs and Border Protection are saving lives," he said. Fox News' Travis Fedschun contributed to this report.
Fox News' Sean Hannity focused Monday night on the change within the Democratic Party, declaring once again that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is now the leader and that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is "powerless."
"They
are on the verge of an all-out civil war. Nancy Pelosi has lost
complete control of her radical socialist base. Freshman Congresswoman
Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman Tlaib and Omar and Ayanna Pressley are now
running the show," Hannity said on his television show.
"Speaker Pelosi is now totally powerless."
Hannity
was reacting to past comments made by the four congresswomen who
responded to President Trump's controversial tweets Sunday calling for
the progressive congresswomen to "go back" to where they came from.
Trump doubled down Monday calling out the lawmakers for their Anti-American "hate."
Hannity
warned that "radicals" within the Democratic Party will use identity
politics to attack any that oppose them including other Democrats to
"reshape America."
"It does not matter what Speaker Pelosi says,
what she does. The radicals who are in charge, anyone who opposes them
of course quickly labeled xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist,
sexist, and a bigot and want dirty air and water," Hannity told his
audience.
"The so-called 'squad' of far left freshmen
congresswomen are now using identity politics even against members of
their own party. The end goal is to fundamentally reshape America."
The Fox News host also pointed out the influence this "wing" has on the Democratic presidential candidates.
"The
base of the Democratic Party is so powerful that every 2020 hopeful has
adopted their fringe socialist policies. And if they don't adopt it
completely they are trashed by many of the four," Hannity said.
Hannity
blasted the four congresswomen for calling for the impeachment of
President Trump Monday during a press conference and for their vision of
the country.
"They don't want to improve this country. They want
to remake this country into something we all know will fail," Hannity
said. "They want to impeach the one person that's been standing in their
way." Fox News' Gregg Re contributed to this report.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson,
D-Miss., was seeking extra protection for members of Congress on Monday
after President Trump’s tweets and remarks about the progressive
“squad.”
Trump’s remarks apparently were directed at four congresswomen:
Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York,
Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. All are
American citizens and three of the four were born in the U.S.
Far
from backing down, Trump on Monday dug in on comments he had initially
made a day earlier on Twitter that if lawmakers “hate our country,” they
can go back to their “broken and crime-infested” countries.
The House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Rep. Bennie G.
Thompson, D-Miss., right, is seeking extra protection for members of
Congress. The letter is addressed to Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael
Stenger, left, because, this year, he heads the Capitol Police Board.
(Getty, File)
“If you’re not happy in the U.S., if you’re complaining all the time, you can leave, you can leave right now,” he said.
In
the letter for House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving and Senate Sergeant
at Arms Michael Stenger, Thompson argued that the Capitol Police Board
should meet to “analyze the current threat environment and set
thresholds for enhanced safety of Members.”
Thompson asked for a meeting within 48 hours and a classified readout of the meeting.
The letter was addressed to Stenger because he has headed the Capitol Police Board this year.
Thompson
said security officials should set “thresholds for enhanced security
for certain targeted Members, and evaluate threat streams with law
enforcement partners in Member districts. Being proactive in this
instance is vital to the safety of not only these targeted Members, but
all Members of Congress.”
Fox News has been told that despite
Thompson’s pleas, other lawmakers have faced more serious threats than
members of the squad ahead of Trump's tweets.
Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke revealed on Twitter Sunday that he and his wife Amy are both descended from slave owners.
“Something
that we’ve been talking about in town hall meetings – the legacy of
slavery in the United States – now has a much more personal connection,”
O’Rourke said. “I was recently given documents showing that both Amy
and I are descended from people who owned slaves.”
O’Rourke included a link to a medium.com article he wrote titled “Rose and Eliza,” in reference to two slaves one his distance relatives owned.
“A paternal great-great-great grandfather of mine, Andrew Cowan Jasper, owned these two women in the 1850s,” O’Rourke wrote.
Democratic presidential candidate, former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke
speaks at the Manchester Democrats annual Potluck Picnic at Oak Park in
Manchester, N.H.
(AP)
He added that records also showed
that an ancestor of his wife, Amy, owned slaves while another was part
of the Confederate Army.
O’Rourke noted that he’s spoken about the
legacy of slavery in the U.S. while campaigning, but that such
discussions now have “a much more personal connection.”
O’Rourke’s
disclosure comes as discussions of reparations for slavery have become a
hot-button issue among Democratic candidates for the 2020 presidential
election.
Last month House Democrats held a hearing
on reparations for slavery for the first time in more than a decade.
The panel’s aim was to “examine, through open and constructive
discourse, the legacy of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.” Fox News Gerren Keith Gaynor and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
After triggering backlash over tweets urging progressive congresswomen to go back to their "broken and crime infested" home countries, President Trump appeared unbowed Sunday night, suggesting it was "so sad" to see Democrats sticking up for the lawmakers.
"So
sad to see the Democrats sticking up for people who speak so badly of
our Country and who, in addition, hate Israel with a true and unbridled
passion. Whenever confronted, they call their adversaries, including
Nancy Pelosi, 'RACIST,'" Trump tweeted.
"Their disgusting language... and the many terrible things they say
about the United States must not be allowed to go unchallenged."
He
continued, "If the Democrat Party wants to continue to condone such
disgraceful behavior, then we look even more forward to seeing you at
the ballot box in 2020!"
Trump’s earlier attack
drew a searing condemnation from Democrats who labeled the remarks
racist and breathtakingly divisive. The president’s tweets led Democrats
in large part to set aside their internal rifts to rise up in a united
chorus against the president. Republicans remained largely silent.
Trump's tweets did not name any specific congresswomen. However,
among his frequent targets is Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., the first
Somali native elected to Congress and one of its first Muslim women. She
was born in Somalia but spent much of her childhood in a Kenyan refugee
camp as civil war tore apart her home country.
New York Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is of Puerto Rican descent, was born in
the Bronx, N.Y., and raised in suburban Westchester County. Trump's
latest tweets appeared to reference Ocasio-Cortez; she had accused House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., of "singling out" women of color last
week, although she later denied she was accusing Pelosi of racism.
Ocasio-Cortez
had fired back at Trump's initial tweets. "You are angry because you
can’t conceive of an America that includes us. You rely on a frightened
America for your plunder," she tweeted, later adding: "But you know
what’s the rub of it all, Mr. President? On top of not accepting an
America that elected us, you cannot accept that we don’t fear you,
either. You can’t accept that we will call your bluff & offer a
positive vision for this country. And that’s what makes you seethe."
Omar, for her part, responded to Trump's latest tweets by quoting
author James Baldwin: "There are few things more dreadful than dealing
with a man who knows he is going under, in his own eyes, and in the eyes
of others. Nothing can help that man. What is left of that man flees
from what is left of human attention."
Pelosi tweeted,
"When @realDonaldTrump tells four American Congresswomen to go back to
their countries, he reaffirms his plan to 'Make America Great Again' has
always been about making America white again. Our diversity is our
strength and our unity is our power."
Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel on Sunday called for the FBI and CIA to investigate whether Chinese intelligence had infiltrated Google, according to a report.
Thiel,
who supported Trump in 2016 and Facebook board member, made the
comments during a speech at the National Conservatism Conference in
Washington. He said the FBI and CIA needed to ask Google three questions
to determine if the tech giant had been compromised by Chinese
intelligence, Axios reported.
FILE: A Google Home Hub is displayed in New York.
(AP)
“Number one: How many foreign
intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan Project for AI
(artificial intelligence)?” Thiel reportedly asked. “Number two: Does
Google’s senior management consider itself to have been thoroughly
infiltrated by Chinese intelligence?”
Thiel then slammed Google
for its decision to work with the Chinese military while refusing to
renew a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense.
“Number
three: Is it because they consider themselves to be so thoroughly
infiltrated that they have engaged in the seemingly treasonous decision
to work with the Chinese military and not with the US military,” Thiel
said.
Google has faced criticism over its work on a censored search engine – “Project Dragonfly”
– that would allow it to return to China after leaving in 2010 over
human rights concerns. The company dropped the project after members of
the company's privacy team raised complaints.
Other reports said that Google decided not to renew its contract for Project Maven
– a controversial military program that uses artificial intelligence to
improve drone targeting – which expired earlier this year.
Google did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment. Fox News' Louis Casiano contributed to this report.
The Speaker of the House doesn’t talk to the Treasury Secretary on a Saturday night, then send him a letter, and, then blast out a press release, unless it’s urgent. But that’s what happened Saturday night. This
is all about Washington’s second favorite, semi-annual acrobatic
regimen: a fight over increasing the debt ceiling. Washington’s favorite
exploit is a battle over funding the government. The latter will come
in less than two months. But the former is here now – a little sooner
than everyone thought. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin have become phone friends of late.
They’ve burned up the lines more than teenyboppers singing “Telephone Hour” in Bye Bye Birdie. Pelosi appears to prefer to work with Mnuchin on this issue – and do it telephonically. The House Speaker has little use for acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.
Multiple Congressional sources tell Fox that Mulvaney infuriated
Democrats during the last set of bicameral, bipartisan meetings on the
debt ceiling on Capitol Hill. Three weeks ago, a clearly agitated Pelosi
told reporters she refused to “waste time” on Mulvaney’s
characterization of her remarks in the session. She also said that
Mulvaney “has no credibility” on the debt ceiling “whatsoever.” That said, Mulvaney appears to be the administration official most in tune with the id of President Trump. So, lawmakers ignore Mulvaney - and Mr. Trump’s impulses - at their peril. Still,
Pelosi apparently prefers to use the phone to engage Mnuchin. And
perhaps, the same is the case for Mnuchin when it comes to discourse
with Pelosi. There’s a reason why Ambrose Bierce described the telephone
as “an invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of
making a disagreeable keep his distance.” To wit, regarding communications between Pelosi and Mnuchin: The duo spoke last Wednesday night about an urgent need to raise the debt limit. Pelosi and Mnuchin talked twice last Thursday. They spoke midday on Friday. Then the duo chatted for 12 minutes Saturday night. Mnuchin
sent Pelosi a letter underscoring the need hike the debt ceiling in the
next couple of weeks. The Speaker responded with her own missive to the
Treasury Secretary Saturday night. The nation’s top political
leaders don’t chat this often and volley communiques between one another
- especially on a Saturday night – unless there’s a problem. The problem is that a vote to increase the debt limit is one of the most onerous ballots lawmakers can cast. The problem is that no one wants to vote to authorize more debt. But the problem
is that Congress must lift the debt threshold soon or risk a downgrade
in the nation’s credit rating, rattle the stock market or send a shock
through the bond market. The problem is that Mnuchin is
imploring Congress to raise the debt ceiling right away – before
lawmakers abandon Washington for most of August and the traditional
summer recess. That’s because few in Washington paid close attention to
this issue until a few days ago. That’s when Mnuchin suggested the
government could “run out of cash in early September, before Congress
reconvenes.” Government reserves will soon dwindle to about $250
billion. The accelerated timetable is partly due to diminished revenues,
attributable to the new tax law. One could spot a signal that
government coffers are going dry the other day: the yield of short-term
Treasury bill yields. The return on a Treasury bill maturing in
mid-September is now higher than those ripening in mid-August. People
are also not investing in shorter-term government securities - another
sign of possible trouble. If Congress and the Trump Administration
don’t act soon, federal cash reserves could wane and the government
could scuffle to meet liquidity needs. By sending out a letter on a
Saturday night, Pelosi is trying to sound an alarm, emphasizing to
lawmakers the need to expeditiously raise the debt ceiling. Official
Washington has long known about the need to raise the debt ceiling. The
sides were talking months ago about marshaling a two-year agreement on
the spending caps and mixing it with the debt limit. Back in May, Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) suggested they were so close
that an accord could just be hours away. But then talks melted. In
her Saturday night epistle to Mnuchin, Pelosi insisted the sides cut a
deal on “spending priorities.” This is a reference to stalled efforts to
lift mandatory spending caps Congress imposed in a 2011 package to
boost the debt ceiling. In Washington, the caps are commonly referred to
as “sequestration.” Sequestration hits defense especially hard because
the Pentagon commands the largest chunk of money doled out by Congress
each year. President Trump wants more for defense. Democrats are willing
to bend a little. But that’s why Pelosi is pushing for “parity.” In
other words, Pelosi is requesting a parallel increase in funding for all
non-defense programs, too. Just a few days ago, a senior
Congressional source told Fox that it looked like the sides may have to
agree to a short-term extension of the debt limit. Technically, the
spending cap issue doesn’t need to be resolved until mid-January. But
Pelosi is coupling these issues now. Meantime, many Congressional
Republicans don’t want to just increase the debt limit unless it’s
attached to something . Even if failing to address the debt ceiling
issue threatens the market or the ability of the federal government to
borrow. That’s why some on the GOP side have hoped for an imminent caps
deal. A failure to latch the debt ceiling increase to a caps agreement
could be an issue for some Senate Republicans. This prompted some
chatter about hooking the debt ceiling increase to the bill to fund the
health coverage of sick 9/11 first responders. The House approved the
plan 402-12 on Friday. McConnell promised to tackle the issue in the
next couple of weeks. As he left the Capitol Friday afternoon, 9/11
first responder advocate Jon Stewart specifically spoke against Scotch
taping the 9/11 bill to another measure or vice versa. But, when it
comes to legislating, you don’t get style points. And so,
everyone in Washington has a problem without a lot of time to solve it.
It’s possible Congress could nuke part of the August recess if something
doesn’t come together quickly. Expect more phone calls between Pelosi and Mnuchin. Raising
the debt ceiling is a monumental Congressional task. And while
policymakers may negotiate this over the phone, hiking the debt ceiling
is a subject so significant that you can’t just phone it in.