Responding to a torrent of complaints from Republicans that the impeachment inquiry against President Trump is secretive and one-sided, a lawyer for the anonymous whistleblower who
raised alarms about the presidents' dealings with Ukraine said Sunday
his client is willing to answer written questions submitted by House
Republicans.
But, late Sunday, House Oversight Committee ranking
member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, seemingly rejected the offer from
whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid, saying "written answers will not
provide a sufficient opportunity to probe all the relevant facts and
cross examine the so-called whistleblower."
"You don't get to ignite an impeachment effort and never account for your actions and role in orchestrating it," Jordan said.
Zaid responded by calling Jordan's response a "deliberate deflection."
The whistleblower attorney's surprise offer,
made to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the top Republican on the House
Intelligence Committee, would allow Republicans to ask questions of the
whistleblower, who spurred the impeachment inquiry, without having to go
through the committee's chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.
"Obviously, per House rules GOP is beholden to DEMs," Zaid tweeted. "We, however, are not."
Zaid, a longtime Trump critic, tweeted
that the whistleblower would answer questions directly from Republican
members "in writing, under oath & penalty of perjury," part of a bid
to stem escalating efforts by Trump and his GOP allies to unmask the
person's identity.
Queries seeking "identifying info" about the whistleblower won't be answered, he said.
"Obviously, per House rules GOP is beholden to DEMs. We, however, are not."
— Whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid
"We
will ensure timely answers," Zaid wrote. "We stand ready to cooperate
and ensure facts - rather than partisanship - dictates any process
involving the #whistleblower."
Zaid, when asked by Fox News if Nunes' team had reached out, said there was "no substantive response."
Nunes'
office did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment,
and it was not clear if Jordan was speaking for Nunes.
This past September, Schiff, who long pushed unsubstantiated claims
that the Trump team had conspired illegally with Russians, promised
testimony from the whistleblower "very soon." But, in recent weeks, he's
shifted course and suggested the testimony was unnecessary. In the
meantime, it emerged that Schiff's panel spoke with the whistleblower
before the whistleblower complaint was filed, contrary to Schiff's previous claims.
Trump
repeatedly has demanded the release of the whistleblower's identity,
tweeting Sunday that the person "must come forward." The whistleblower
raised concerns about Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he suggested Zelensky review Joe and Hunter
Biden's dealings there. The younger Biden routinely secured lucrative roles both domestically and abroad, with little relevant expertise, while his father was a powerful senator and, later, vice president.
The
whistleblower's secondhand account of the call has been providing a
road map for House Democrats investigating whether the president and
others in his orbit pressured Ukraine to probe political opponents,
including former Vice President Joe Biden.
"Reveal the Whistleblower and end the Impeachment Hoax!" Trump tweeted.
Trump
later Sunday pushed the news media to divulge the whistleblower's
identity, asserting that the person's accounting of events was
incorrect. The whistleblower's complaint has been corroborated in part
by people with firsthand knowledge of the events who have appeared on
Capitol Hill -- but key inconsistencies also have emerged.
For
example, the complaint stated that Trump made a "specific request that
the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic
National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm
CrowdStrike" -- a request that did not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration.
"They
know who it is. You know who it is. You just don't want to report it,"
Trump told reporters at the White House. "You know you'd be doing the
public a service if you did."
U.S. whistleblower laws have existed
to protect the identity and careers of people bringing forward
accusations of criminal wrongdoing by government officials, but many
Republicans have argued -- citing career Justice Department officials --
that nothing criminal occurred during Trump's call.
Republicans
are said to have eyed a political opportunity in unmasking the CIA
official, who the intelligence community's inspector general said could
have "arguable political bias."
Zaid acknowledged in a statement last
month that his client "has come into contact with presidential
candidates from both parties" -- but insisted that the contact involved
the politicians' roles as "elected officials – not as candidates."
And,
Fox News reported in October that the whistleblower told
the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) that bias against
the president might be alleged against him or her for a third,
previously unreported reason. Fox News previously reported the
whistleblower was a registered Democrat and had a prior work history with a senior Democrat, but the third potential indicator of bias remained unclear.
House
Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said Sunday he had not yet
discussed the whistleblower's offer with Nunes, but stressed that the
person should answer questions in a public appearance before the
committee.
"When you're talking about the removal of the president
of the United States, undoing democracy, undoing what the American
public had voted for, I think that individual should come before the
committee," McCarthy told CBS News' "Face the Nation."
"We need an openness that people understand this," he added.
Zaid
said his team had addressed the issue of alleged bias with Republican
members of the committee and had stressed the need for anonymity to
maintain the safety of the whistleblower and that person's family, "but
with little effect in halting the attacks."
"Let
me be absolutely clear: Our willingness to cooperate has not changed,"
tweeted Andrew P. Bakaj, another attorney representing the
whistleblower. "What we object to and find offensive, however, is the
effort to uncover the identity of the whistleblower."
Bakaj wrote
Saturday that "their fixation on exposing the whistleblower's identity
is simply because they're at a loss as to how to address the
investigations the underlying disclosure prompted."
Fox News' Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.