The top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee has formally requested that the panel's chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., testify in a closed-door setting as part of the impeachment inquiry against President Trump.
Fox
News has obtained a letter written by committee Ranking Member Devin
Nunes, R-Calif., who demanded that Schiff appear for a deposition in
private before lawmakers.
"On November 6th, you announced the
beginning of public hearings associated with the Democratic Party's
partisan impeachment inquiry into President Donald J. Trump," Nunes
wrote Friday. "Based on the precedent and lack of jurisdiction, the
House Intelligence Committee should not take the lead in conducting such
hearings; however, by now the American people know your desire to see
the duly-elected president removed from office outweighs your sense of
responsibility to running a functioning intelligence oversight
committee.
"Prior to the start of your public show trial next
week, at least one additional closed-door deposition must take place,"
he continued. "Specifically, I request that you sit for a closed-door
deposition before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight
Committees."
Nunes went on to note that in August 2019, Schiff and
his staff "met with or talked to the whistleblower who raised an issue
with President Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President [Volodymyr]
Zelensky."
"Although you publicly claim nothing inappropriate was
discussed, the three committees deserve to hear directly from you the
substance and circumstances surrounding any discussions conducted with
the whistleblower, and any instructions you issued regarding those
discussions," Nunes wrote. "Given that you have reneged on your public
commitment to let the committees interview the whistleblower directly,
you are the only individual who can provide clarity as to these
conversations."
He
added: "As you know, the House Intelligence Committee has precedent for
such an arrangement. During the Committee's investigation into Russian
interference in the 2016 election, sitting Members of Congress agreed to
participate in closed-door depositions. Given your championing of such
an arrangement two years ago, you should have no problem with you
appearing before the three committees to discuss your interactions with
the whistleblower."
Schiff maintains that he has not personally
spoken with the anonymous whistleblower. However, it was revealed
several weeks ago that the whistleblower had early contact with his
office, essentially giving them a heads-up about the complaint
concerning Trump's July 25 phone call with Zelensky.
Meanwhile,
Republicans are expected to release a full list of proposed witnesses
for testimony in a public setting in the coming days.
Nunes’ and
Republicans’ effort to devise a strategy going forward comes after the
House approved rules for the impeachment inquiry process last week.
While Republicans opposed the resolution and complained the rules were
unfair, Democrats still gave GOP lawmakers the ability to subpoena
witnesses with the concurrence of Democratic committee chairs. If the
chair does not consent, the minority can appeal to the full committee.
This
process still gives Democrats final say over witnesses. A GOP source
told Fox News this week that it's unlikely Democrats would go along with
the efforts to call Schiff -- who is essentially leading the
impeachment probe.
The source told Fox News that Republicans
want answers to questions like: “How many times did he [Schiff] meet
with the whistleblower? What did they advise the whistleblower to do?
How much was Schiff involved in this? Did he recommend the whistleblower
give the complaint to the intelligence community inspector general,
even though there was no intel component so that he could be involved?”
But GOP lawmakers for days had telegraphed that they were interested in making the attempt.
House
GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said Sunday on CBS' "Face the
Nation" that Schiff is the "first person" who should be brought in,
along with his staff.
Last week, House Judiciary Committee Ranking
Member Doug Collins, R-Ga., publicly challenged Schiff to come before
the judiciary panel.
“Come to the Judiciary Committee," Collins
said after the passage of the impeachment rules resolution. "Be the
first witness and take every question asked of you. Starting with your
own involvement [with] the whistleblower.”
Schiff’s
office last month said that the whistleblower had reached out to them
before filing the complaint in mid-August, giving Democrats advance
warning of the accusations that would lead them to launch the inquiry
days later. The inspector general's complaint about Trump’s phone call
with Zelensky flagged concerns about efforts to pressure Ukraine to
investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter
as military aid to the country was being withheld.
A transcript
released by the White House shows Trump making that request, but he and
his congressional allies deny, and plan to continue to deny, that
military aid was clearly linked to the request, or that there was any
"quid pro quo." Some witnesses who have appeared before House committees
as part of the impeachment proceedings have challenged that assertion.
Meanwhile,
Republicans are also hoping to call the whistleblower to testify,
according to the source, who pointed to Schiff’s recent reversal on the
issue.
Schiff in
September had promised testimony from the whistleblower “very soon."
But in recent weeks has suggested that testimony is unnecessary.
Meanwhile,
Schiff announced Wednesday that his committee would hold the first
open hearings of the impeachment inquiry next week, featuring current
and former officials with knowledge of the Ukraine controversy.
“On
Wednesday, November 13, 2019, we will hear from [U.S. charge d'affaires
for Ukraine] William Taylor and [diplomat] George Kent,” Schiff
announced. “On Friday, November 15, 2019, we will hear from [former U.S.
Ambassador to Ukraine] Marie Yovanovitch.