House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
drew criticism Wednesday for handing out commemorative pens -- with her
name on them -- after signing a resolution to transmit two articles of impeachment against President Trump to the Senate for trial. To critics, the tone of the event seemed celebratory -- a far cry from December, when Pelosi wore black
and insisted on the House floor it was a “solemn” day before the
Democrat-controlled body voted to impeach the president on abuse of
power and obstruction of Congress allegations. Later, she even cut short two rounds of cheers from Democrats when the articles were adopted. “Nancy
Pelosi’s souvenir pens served up on silver platters to sign the sham
articles of impeachment,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham
tweeted in response. “She was so somber as she gave them away to people
like prizes.” “You
know what you hand out pens for? Accomplishments. Like, say, signing a
historic trade deal with China,” Republican National Committee
spokeswoman Elizabeth Harrington added, referencing Trump -- who on the
same day as Pelosi's impeachment signing entered a landmark trade
agreement with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He in the East Room of the White
House. Trump maintains the House impeachment effort -- based on
accusations that he pressured Ukraine to launch an investigation into
his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son,
Hunter, in exchange for U.S. military aid -- is a “hoax” and claims he
is a victim of a political “witch hunt” led by Pelosi. He is the third
president in U.S. history to be impeached. “So it's fitting that
Democrats are handing out pens for their sole accomplishment:
impeachment. Democrats have done NOTHING for the American people,”
Harrington added. Before the signing Wednesday, aides set out two
small trays containing more than two dozen black pens emblazoned with
Pelosi's signature. She entered the room and sat at a table with the
documents and pens before her. House prosecutors and the committee
chairmen who had worked on Trump's impeachment were standing around her.
Pelosi picked up each pen, signed a bit, and handed each one to a
lawmaker. Sometimes, she was smiling. “Embarrassing spectacle -
Pelosi using sterling silver platters and handing out ceremonial pens to
everyone in sight, made it ridiculously theatrical and so tacky and
clownish. What goofballs,” Mark Simone, a conservative radio host,
tweeted. “Impeachment is so “Prayerful” that Pelosi was handing
out pens in celebration. Pathetic,” Benny Johnson, chief creative
officer for Turning Point USA, added. At a Dec. 5
news conference, Pelosi had shot back at a reporter who accused her of
hating Trump, saying that she, as a woman raised in a Catholic home,
actually prays for the president. “This is about the Constitution
of the United States and the facts that lead to the president’s
violation of his oath of office. And as a Catholic I resent your using
the word 'hate' in a sentence that addresses me. I don’t hate anyone. I
was raised in a way that is full, a heart full of love, and always pray
for the president. And I still pray for the president. I pray for the
president all the time. So don’t mess with me when it comes to words
like that,” Pelosi exclaimed. In a letter
sent to Pelosi the day before the Dec. 18 impeachment vote, Trump
questioned whether she was sincere about her faith and alleged she was
waging a war on American democracy in her decision to launch the
House-led impeachment inquiry back in September.
The pens that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., will use to
sign the resolution to transmit the two articles of impeachment against
President Trump to the Senate for trial. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
“Even worse than offending the Founding Fathers, you
are offending Americans of faith by continually saying “I pray for the
President,” when you know this statement is not true, unless it is meant
in a negative sense,” Trump countered.
House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters,
D-Calif., second from right, reacts after getting a pen from House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., after she signed the resolution to
transmit the two articles of impeachment against President Trump to the
Senate for trial on Capitol Hill. (Associated Press)
Pelosi’s signature Wednesday sent the articles to the Senate for trial, which is expected to open Thursday. After
the House vote, Pelosi withheld the articles for about four weeks from
the Senate in an effort to pressure Senate Republicans to commit to
seeing additional documents and testimony as part of trial proceedings.
That promise never came, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell,
R-Ky., told reporters Tuesday he was considering allowing both sides –
Democrats and Republicans – to call additional witnesses. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
President Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday that dismissal of the articles of impeachment against
the president should be allowed under the Senate's trial rules because
the allegations don’t amount to high crimes and misdemeanors. The
articles “fall on their face” as impeachable offenses, Giuliani wrote in
an op-ed for War Room: Impeachment, a website run by former White House
adviser Steve Bannon. Giuliani argued that the impeachment articles should be given the same scrutiny as charges in a criminal trial. “Thus
an impeachment, like an indictment, must be tested by a motion to
dismiss if it fails to allege an impeachable offense,” he wrote. If
the articles don’t amount to an impeachable offense “it is not only an
abuse of power but an unconstitutional violation of separation of
powers," he added. The 75-year-old former mayor of New York City
claimed that the “abuse of power” charge -- over President Trump’s July
phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump
allegedly asked for an investigation into the Bidens and withheld
military aid on that condition -- was a “conversation without threat,
pressure, inducement or quid pro quo.” In November, U.S.
Ambassador Gordon Sondland implicated top White House officials in a
"potential quid pro quo" over the withheld military aid to Ukraine
during testimony in the House’s impeachment inquiry, saying “everyone
was in the loop.” He testified, however, that he never heard Trump tie
the aid to investigating the Bidens. Sondland's testimony also
contradicted a previous statement attributed to him, in which he
allegedly said the Trump-Ukraine discussion involved no quid pro quo. The
House also charged Trump with “obstruction of Congress” in the second
article for blocking witnesses and documents during inquiries by House
committees. Giuliani claimed Democrats used “sparse factual
allegations” for the charges, saying it arguably violated executive and
attorney-client privilege, among others. He also claimed neither article is a crime or misdemeanor. “It
would be a mockery of justice to have a trial on charges that are
insufficient to result in anything other than an acquittal," he wrote. He
added that the House of Representatives has “trashed” the separation of
powers by not giving Trump fair treatment during their inquiry. “Failure to dismiss would give credence to this entirely illegitimate process,” he wrote, and would set a bad precedent for future “partisan majorities.”
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., accompanied by Sen. Joni Ernst
R-Iowa, and other senators, speaks outside of the Senate chamber, on
Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2020. (AP Photo/Jose Luis
Magana)
WASHINGTON
(AP) — Republicans controlling the Senate are taking advantage of
delays in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial to speed up a vote
on a modified North American trade pact.
Thursday’s
expected vote promises sweeping bipartisan support for legislation
implementing the terms of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It
would replace the 25-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement, which
Trump and many lawmakers blames for shipping U.S. manufacturing jobs to
Mexico.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., announced the vote at his weekly news conference Tuesday.
The
Senate vote would follow a sweeping vote in the Democratic-controlled
House last month and would send the legislation to Trump for his
signature. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi played a central role in modifying
the pact further to assuage allies in organized labor, such as AFL-CIO
President Richard Trumka.
The
agreement is projected to have only a modest impact on the economy. But
it gives lawmakers from both parties the chance to support an agreement
sought by farmers, ranchers and business owners anxious to move past
the months of trade tensions that have complicated spending and hiring
decisions.
Trump
made tearing up NAFTA a hallmark of his presidential run in 2016 as he
tried to win over working-class voters in states such as Michigan, Ohio,
Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
The
new pact contains provisions designed to nudge manufacturing back to
the United States. For example, it requires that 40% to 45% of cars
eventually be made in countries that pay autoworkers at least $16 an
hour — that is, in the United States and Canada and not in Mexico.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is set to vote to send the articles of impeachment
against President Donald Trump to the Senate for a landmark trial on
whether the charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are
grounds for removal.
Speaker
Nancy Pelosi announced the next steps Tuesday after meeting privately
with House Democrats at the Capitol, ending her blockade a month after
they voted to impeach Trump.
After the midday Wednesday vote, House managers named to prosecute the
case will walk the articles across the Capitol in a dramatic procession
that evening.
It will be only the third presidential impeachment trial in American history, a serious moment coming amid the backdrop of a politically divided nation and an election year.
“The
President and the Senators will be held accountable,” Pelosi said in a
statement. “The American people deserve the truth, and the Constitution
demands a trial.”
The
Senate is expected to transform into an impeachment court as early as
Thursday. The Constitution calls for the chief justice to preside over
senators, who serve as jurors, to swear an oath to deliver “impartial
justice.″
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday the chief justice would
open the trial this week, but that the significant proceedings would
launch next Tuesday, after the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday.
Trump was impeached by the Democratic-led House last month
on charges of abuse of power over pushing Ukraine to investigate
Democratic rival Joe Biden as the president withheld aid from the
country, and obstructing Congress’ ensuing probe.
McConnell
met behind closed doors Tuesday with GOP senators who are under
pressure from Democrats to call new witnesses and testimony. He urged
them to hold together on the next steps, according to a person
unauthorized to discuss the private session and granted anonymity.
Late
Tuesday, House investigators announced they were turning over a “trove”
of new records of phone calls, text messages and other information from
Lev Parnas, an associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. Intelligence
Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said the information shows Trump’s effort
’’to coerce Ukraine into helping the President’s reelection campaign.”
He said this and other new testimony must be included in the Senate
trial.
McConnell,
who is negotiating rules for the trial proceedings, he said all 53 GOP
senators are on board with his plan to start the session and consider
the issue of witnesses later.
Senate
Republicans also signaled they would reject the idea of simply voting
to dismiss the articles of impeachment against Trump, as the president
has suggested. McConnell agreed he does not have the votes to do that.
“There
is little or no sentiment in the Republican conference for a motion to
dismiss,” McConnell said. ’’Our members feel we have an obligation to
listen to the arguments.”
In
fact, a mounting number of senators say they want to ensure the ground
rules include the possibility of calling new witnesses.
Sen.
Susan Collins of Maine is leading an effort among some Republicans,
including Mitt Romney of Utah and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska for witness
votes.
“My position is that there should be a vote on whether or not witnesses should be called,” Collins said.
Romney
said he wants to hear from John Bolton, the former national security
adviser at the White House, who others have said raised alarms about the
alternative foreign policy toward Ukraine being run by Trump’s personal
lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Democrats
have been pushing Republicans, who have a slim Senate majority, to
consider new testimony, arguing that fresh information has emerged
during Pelosi’s monthlong delay in transmitting the charges.
“We
want the truth,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday as
the chamber opened. He said that in other presidential impeachment
trials the Senate called witnesses. “Do Senate Republicans want to break
the lengthy historical precedent?”
Republicans
control the chamber, 53-47, and are all but certain to acquit Trump. It
takes just 51 votes during the impeachment trial to approve rules or
call witnesses. Just four GOP senators could form a majority with
Democrats to insist on new testimony. It also would take only 51
senators to vote to dismiss the charges against Trump.
At
the private GOP lunch, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky warned that if
witnesses are allowed, defense witnesses could also be called. He and
other Republicans want to subpoena Biden and his son, Hunter, who served
on the board of a gas company in Ukraine, Burisma, while his father was
vice president.
“I look forward to forcing votes to call Hunter Biden and many more,” tweeted Paul, an ally of the president, late Monday.
McConnell
is drafting an organizing resolution that will outline the steps ahead.
Approving it will be among their first votes of the trial, likely next
Tuesday.
He
prefers to model Trump’s trial partly on the process used for
then-President Bill Clinton’s trial in 1999. It, too, contained motions
for dismissal or calling new witnesses.
“Fifty-one senators will decide who to call,” McConnell said.
McConnell
is hesitant to call new witnesses who would prolong the trial and put
vulnerable senators who are up for reelection in 2020 in a bind with
tough choices. At the same time, he wants to give those same senators
ample room to show voters they are listening to demands for a fair
trial.
Most
Republicans now appear willing to go along with McConnell’s plan to
start the trial first then consider witnesses later, rather than
upfront, as Democrats want.
Even
if senators are able to vote to call new witnesses, it is not at all
clear there would be majorities to subpoena Bolton or the others.
“I’ve
been working to make sure that we will have a process that we can take a
vote on whether or not we need additional information, and yes, that
would include witnesses,” Murkowski told reporters.
McConnell
opened the Senate on Tuesday scoffing at what he called the “bizarro
world” of Pelosi’s impeachment strategy that delayed transmitting the
charges for weeks.
“Do
these sound like leaders who really believe we are in a constitutional
crisis, one that requires the most severe remedy?” McConnell asked. He
rejected Pelosi’s recent suggestions that whatever the Senate verdict,
Trump will be “impeached forever.”
“It will fall to the Senate to end it with seriousness and sobriety,” he said.
Pelosi has yet to announce House managers to prosecute the case in the Senate.
Schiff
is expected to lead the team. He gave the caucus a presentation on
Tuesday about the transmittal of the articles and the Senate trial,
according to two people who were in the room.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler is also widely expected to be an impeachment manager.
The Senate chaplain opened the day’s session with an apparent nod to what’s ahead.
“Teach
our lawmakers to disagree with respect, civility and humility,”
Chaplain Barry Black, a retired rear admiral of the Navy, said in
prayer. Help them to remember, he prayed, that “patriots reside on both
sides of the aisle.”
___
Associated Press writers Matthew Daly, Andrew Taylor and Padmananda Rama contributed to this report.
Presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., seemed to reject Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., as he offered a handshake following Tuesday's Democratic presidential debate in Iowa.
The two candidates,
who are competing for the most progressive voters in the Democratic
Party, had seen their apparent nonaggression pact fray in recent days —
seemingly culminating in Warren spurning Sanders' gesture on national
television. She shook former Vice President Joe Biden's hand just
moments before.
The rift between the senators was accelerated by a story, first reported by CNN, that Sanders had told Warren in late 2018 he did not think a woman could win a presidential election.
"Well,
as a matter of fact, I didn't say it," Sanders said Tuesday evening in
response to a question from the CNN moderators asking him why he had
made that statement to his fellow senator. "Anybody who knows me knows
that it's incomprehensible that I would think that a woman could not be
president of the United States."
That answer did not appear to
satisfy Warren, however, who responded, "I disagreed," when CNN
moderators asked her what she thought, "when Senator Sanders told you a
woman could not win the election."
Warren went on to point out
that she and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Mass., had won every single election
they had ever run in, a feat none of the men onstage could claim.
'Look
at the men on this stage. Collectively, they have lost 10 elections.
The only people on this stage who have won every single election that
they have been in are the women — Amy [Klobuchar] and me.' — Elizabeth Warren
"Can
a woman beat Donald Trump?" Warren asked. "Look at the men on this
stage. Collectively, they have lost 10 elections. The only people on
this stage who have won every single election that they have been in are
the women — Amy [Klobuchar] and me.
"And the only person on this
stage who has beaten an incumbent Republican any time in the past 30
years is me," she continued, referencing her 2012 victory over former
Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass.
Tuesday's debate was the final chance
voters will get to see all the top candidates on the same stage before
the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses, which can make or break
presidential primary campaigns.
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn moved Tuesday to withdraw his guilty plea for lying to the FBI in the Russia probe, citing "bad faith" by the government.
The
court filing came just days after the Justice Department reversed
course to recommend up to six months of prison time in his case,
alleging he was not fully cooperating or accepting responsibility for
his actions.
But, in Tuesday’s court filing, his legal team said
he moved to withdraw his plea "because of the government's bad faith,
vindictiveness and breach of the plea agreement."
"The
prosecution has shown abject bad faith in pure retaliation against Mr.
Flynn since he retained new counsel," Flynn’s attorneys wrote in the
filing. "This can only be because with new, unconflicted counsel, Mr.
Flynn refused to lie for the prosecution."
The filing continued:"Justice is not a game, and there should be no room for such gamesmanship in the Department of Justice."
In
the court filing, Flynn's lawyers said the Justice Department is
attempting to "rewrite history" by withdrawing its recommendation that
he be sentenced to probation and by suggesting he had not been
forthcoming or cooperative.
"Michael T. Flynn is innocent. Mr.
Flynn has cooperated with the government in good faith for two years. He
gave the prosecution his full cooperation," the attorneys added.
Flynn's
case stemmed from a 2017 FBI interview, in which he was asked about his
conversations with former Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey
Kislyak. Flynn ultimately pleaded guilty to making false statements
regarding those conversations during his interview, as part of former
Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.
Flynn is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 28 in a D.C. federal court by Judge Emmet Sullivan.
The
judge last December rejected claims from Flynn's lawyers that he was
pressured to plead guilty to lying to federal investigators about his
contacts with the Russian diplomat. His lawyers also had claimed the
government withheld critical evidence that may have favored their
client.
"It's been one atrocity after another," Sidney Powell, one
of Flynn's lawyers, said on Fox News' "Hannity" Tuesday evening. "The
recent sentencing note is full of lies."
The
Justice Department wrote in its sentencing memorandum last week that
Flynn's "conduct was more than just a series of lies; it was an abuse of
trust."
The memorandum continued: "The government acknowledges
that the defendant's history of military service, and his prior
assistance to the government, though not substantial, may distinguish
him from these other defendants. The government asks the court to
consider all of these factors, and to impose an appropriate sentence." Fox News’ Brooke Singman and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
NASHVILLE,
Tenn. (AP) — Donald Trump Jr. is coming to Tennessee later this month
to help raise money for Republican Bill Hagerty in his bid for an open
U.S. Senate seat.
According
to an invitation to the fundraiser, President Donald Trump’s oldest son
and former Fox News personality Kimberly Guilfoyle will headline for
Hagerty on Jan. 28 in Gallatin. The luncheon costs $1,000 a person.
Attending the luncheon plus a photo reception runs $2,800 per person.
The
appearance helps Hagerty keep highlighting the president’s endorsement
of him in the race to replace retiring Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander.
The
event also marks the first big headliner for Hagerty, a Nashville
businessman who previously served as Trump’s ambassador to Japan and has
rejoined the board of a private investment firm. Other notable names
within Trump’s circle are likely to visit Tennessee for him in the
months leading up to the August primary election.
Hagerty’s
main GOP primary opponent is Nashville trauma surgeon Manny Sethi, who
also has stressed his support for the president. Sethi has billed
himself as a “conservative outsider.”
Republicans have held both of Tennessee’s U.S. Senate seats since 1994.
Nashville attorney and former Army helicopter pilot James Mackler is one of the top Democrats to enter the Senate race.
DUBAI,
United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran’s judiciary said Tuesday that arrests
have been made for the accidental shootdown of a Ukrainian passenger
plane that killed all 176 people on board just after takeoff from Tehran
last week.
The
announcement came amid an upswell of anger and protests by Iranians in
recent days over the downing of the jetliner last Wednesday and apparent
attempts by senior officials in Iran to cover-up the cause of the
crash.
Iran,
which initially dismissed allegations that a missile had brought down
the plane, acknowledged only on Saturday — three days after and in the
face of mounting evidence — that its Revolutionary Guard had shot down
the plane by mistake.
Judiciary
spokesman Gholamhossein Esmaili was quoted by Iranian state media
saying that “extensive investigations have taken place and some
individuals are arrested.” He did not say how many individuals had been
detained or name them.
Iran’s president on Tuesday also called for a special court to be set up to probe the incident.
“The
judiciary should form a special court with a ranking judge and dozens
of experts,” President Hassan Rouhani said in a speech televised in
Iran. “This is not an ordinary case. The entire the world will be
watching this court.”
Rouhani
called the incident “a painful and unforgivable” mistake and promised
that his administration would pursue the case “by all means.”
“The responsibility falls on more than just one person,” he said, adding that those found culpable “should be punished.”
“There are others, too, and I want that this issue is expressed honestly,” he said, without elaborating.
Rouhani called the government’s admission that Iranian forces shot down the plane the “first good step”.
The
plane, en route to the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, was carrying 167
passengers and nine crew members from several countries, including 82
Iranians, 57 Canadians — including many Iranians with dual citizenship —
and 11 Ukrainians, according to officials. There were several children
among the passengers, including an infant.
Iran
shot down the plane when it was bracing for possible U.S. retaliation
for a ballistic missile attack on two military bases housing U.S. troops
in Iraq. No one was hurt in that attack, which was carried out to
avenge the stunning killing of Revolutionary Guard Gen. Qassem Soleimani
in an American airstrike in Baghdad.
Gen.
Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the Guard’s aerospace division, said
over the weekend his unit accepts full responsibility for the shootdown.
He said when he learned about the downing of the plane, “I wished I was
dead.”
The
incident raised questions about why Iran did not shut down its
international airport or airspace the day it was bracing for U.S.
military retaliation.
The
shootdown and the lack of transparency around it has reignited anger in
Iran at the country’s leadership. Online videos appeared to show
security forces firing live ammunition and tear gas to disperse protests in the streets.
Also
Tuesday, Iran’s judiciary said that 30 people had been detained in the
protests, and that some were released, without elaborating further.
Iranian
authorities briefly arrested British Ambassador Rob Macaire on Saturday
evening. He’s said he went to a candlelight vigil to pay his respects
for the victims of the Ukrainian plane shootdown and left as soon as the
chanting began and it turned into a protest.
Iran’s
Foreign Ministry summoned the British ambassador on Sunday to protest
what it said was his presence at an illegal protest. Britain, in turn,
summoned Iran’s ambassador on Monday “to convey our strong objections”
over the weekend arrest.