Despite Wednesday’s blockbuster news about the dozens of Obama
administration officials who “unmasked” then-incoming Trump National
Security Adviser Michael Flynn, there remains a gaping hole in the
story: Where is the record showing who unmasked Flynn in connection with
his fateful conversation with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey
Kislyak? There isn’t one. There is no such evidence in the unmasking list that acting National Intelligence Director Richard Grenell provided to Sens. Chuck Grassley, R- Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis. I
suspect that’s because Lt. Gen. Flynn’s identity was not “masked” in
the first place. Instead, his Dec. 29, 2016 call with Kislyak was likely
intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking
rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a
nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community. “Unmasking”
is a term of art for revealing in classified reports the names of
Americans who have been “incidentally” monitored by our intelligence
agencies. Presumptively, the names of Americans should be concealed in
these reports, which reflect the surveillance of foreign targets,
primarily under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Broadly
speaking, FISA governs two kinds of intelligence collection. The
first is “traditional” FISA – the targeted monitoring of a suspected
clandestine operative of a foreign power. If the FBI shows the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) probable cause that a person
inside the United States is acting as a foreign power’s agent, it may
obtain a warrant to surveil that person. If the foreign power’s
suspected agent communicates with Americans, the latter
are incidentally intercepted even though they are not the targets of the
surveillance.
MADISON, Wis. (AP)
— Wisconsin has been the battleground for political proxy wars for
nearly a decade, the backdrop for bruising feuds over labor unions,
executive power, redistricting and President Donald Trump.
Now,
six months before a presidential election, the state is on fire again.
With a divided state government and a polarized electorate, Wisconsin
has emerged as a hotbed of partisan fighting over the coronavirus,
including how to slow its spread, restart the economy, vote during a
pandemic and judge Trump’s leadership.
In
recent weeks, every political twist has been dissected by the parties,
political scientists and the press, all searching for insight into which
way the swing state might be swinging in the virus era.
ADVERTISEMENT
Democrats had the most significant recent win, a contested statewide Supreme Court race.
It gave them a claim on sense of momentum after making gains in the
2018 midterm elections. But Republicans this past week won a special election for Congress, albeit in a GOP stronghold, and successfully had the governor’s stay-at-home order tossed out by the state Supreme Court.
But
no one is making predictions about Wisconsin in November, other than to
note that the latest fight over the fallout from the coronavirus may be
the most important of them all.
“The
jury’s still out,” said former Gov. Scott Walker, perhaps the figure
most closely associated with Wisconsin’s political turbulence. The
Republican had previously said the economic recovery favored Trump
carrying the state. On Friday, he said the November presidential
election will be a referendum on Trump’s handling of the pandemic.
“One,
how do you feel about your own health and health of your family,”
Walker said. “Two, how do you feel about the health of the economy,
particularly your own job. ... If people are still freaked out, then I
think it’s always tough for any incumbent.”
Taking
their cues from Trump, who has called on states to “liberate” residents
from stay-at-home orders and get back to normal, state Republican
lawmakers challenged Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ order in court. Similar maneuvers have been tried in Michigan and Pennsylvania, the other Rust Belt states that backed Trump in 2016 and handed him the White House.
But only in Wisconsin have Republicans gotten what they wanted,
suddenly taking ownership of the state’s coronavirus response and, with
it, new political risk. While some Wisconsinites rushed out to bars to
celebrate the court’s ruling, many in the state were confused
about the new patchwork of restrictions. Meanwhile, a solid majority of
Wisconsin residents have said they support Evers’ handling of the
crisis, according to a new Marquette University Law School poll.
ADVERTISEMENT
Democrats were quick to cast the issue as much larger than the previous partisan feuds.
“By
November, a significant fraction of Wisconsinites might be close to
someone who has been hospitalized or even died because of coronavirus,”
Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Ben Wikler said. “And those are,
unlike passing news cycles, the things that can create scars that change
how people view politics in their own lives.”
As
in other states, the virus has moved beyond Wisconsin’s big Democratic
cities. Brown County, home of Green Bay and a number of meat processing
plants, has become Wisconsin’s fastest-growing coronavirus hot spot.
In
2016, Trump easily carried the county. But in last month’s election,
Democrats’ choice for the state Supreme Court, Jill Karofsky, won Brown
County, part of her surprisingly strong showing in an election plagued by long lines at polling places and widespread worries over whether it was safe to be voting at all.
Evers tried at the last minute to postpone the election, but Republicans refused. Again, Wisconsin’s drama was projected on the national stage — and mined for lessons about organizing, mail-in voting and ballot access.
“Republicans
in my district were begging us not to hold an in-person election,” said
state Rep. Robyn Vining, a Democrat whose district spans western
Milwaukee County and GOP-leaning suburbs. “People who said they had
voted Republican their entire lives were furious.”
Whether
Republicans will take out any frustrations on Trump is far from clear.
The Marquette University poll this week found Trump has a 47% approval
rate in Wisconsin, virtually unchanged from March. The poll also
registered the impact of the state’s decade of political battles — an
intense polarization.
“There’s
not much of a middle in Wisconsin, at least as far as Donald Trump is
concerned,” said John Johnson, a research fellow from Marquette
University Law School.
The
state was a hotbed of tea party opposition to Barack Obama’s
administration in 2010, sentiment that helped Walker win office and move
to cut public-sector unions’ bargaining rights. The effort ignited mass
Capitol protests in Madison and prompted a bitter recall election a
year later. Walker beat it back and went on to win reelection in 2014.
His
tenure hit at the heart of Wisconsin’s once-progressive tradition. In
addition to his labor legislation, he enacted deep tax cuts and
prevailed over a challenge to Wisconsin’s legislative redistricting —
leaving the state with districts heavily gerrymandered to favor his
party.
Since
Trump’s narrow 2016 victory in Wisconsin — the first by a Republican
presidential candidate since 1984 — Wisconsin has become home to a
permanent campaign. Democrats began a year-round organizing initiative that led to a comeback with Evers’ narrow defeat of Walker in 2018.
Republicans,
too, have invested in organizing in the state, particularly in hunting
for new voters in the rural counties where Trump made strong gains over
past Republicans candidates.
The
Trump campaign says its staff of 60 turned its attention this week to a
special election for a congressional seat in northern Wisconsin. They
made 2.4 million get-out-the-vote calls in the district — roughly half
of all the voter contacts they’ve made this election cycle in the state.
State Sen. Tom Tiffany won the seat by 14 percentage points. Trump carried the district by 20 percentage points in 2016.
___
Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa, and Burnett from Chicago.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Michigan Rep. Justin Amash,
a high-profile critic of President Donald Trump who quit the GOP and
became an independent, announced Saturday he would not seek the
Libertarian nomination for the White House, weeks after saying he was
running because voters wanted an “alternative” to the two major parties.
In
deciding to drop out, he cited the challenges of trying to campaign as a
third-party candidate during the coronavirus pandemic.
“After
much reflection, I’ve concluded that circumstances don’t lend
themselves to my success as a candidate for president this year, and
therefore I will not be a candidate,” he said in one in a series of
tweets explaining his decision. He said “the new reality of social
distancing levels the playing field among the candidates in many
respects, but it also means lesser known candidates are more dependent
on adequate media opportunities to reach people.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Amash said he still thinks such a candidacy could prove successful in the future.
“I
continue to believe that a candidate from outside the old parties,
offering a vision of government grounded in liberty and equality, can
break through in the right environment,” he tweeted. “But this
environment presents extraordinary challenges.”
Amash
would have faced nearly impossible odds of winning the presidency. But
third-party campaigns can have unpredictable consequences for the
Democratic and Republican candidates in the race.
In
2000, Ralph Nader’s Green Party presidential bid cost Democrat Al Gore
crucial support and was a contributing factor in Republican George W.
Bush’s narrow victory. Democrat Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss to Trump has
been blamed in part on the support that Green Party candidate Jill
Stein picked up in states such as Pennsylvania.
Amash left the Republican Party last year and later supported Trump’s impeachment in the Democratic-led House.
In
announcing his intention in late April to seek the Libertarian
nomination, Amash said he wanted to represent the millions of Americans
who do not feel well represented by either major party.
No matter how much you spray the roaches never completely go away.
WASHINGTON
(AP) — Former President Barack Obama on Saturday criticized U.S.
leaders overseeing the nation’s response to the coronavirus, telling
college graduates in an online commencement address that the pandemic
shows many officials “aren’t even pretending to be in charge.”
Obama
spoke on “Show Me Your Walk, HBCU Edition,” a two-hour event for
students graduating from historically black colleges and universities
broadcast on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. His remarks were
unexpectedly political, given the venue, and touched on current events
beyond the virus and its social and economic impacts.
“More
than anything, this pandemic has fully, finally torn back the curtain
on the idea that so many of the folks in charge know what they’re
doing,” Obama said. “A lot them aren’t even pretending to be in charge.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Later
Saturday, during a second televised commencement address for high
school seniors, Obama panned “so-called grown-ups, including some with
fancy titles and important jobs” who do “what feels good, what’s
convenient, what’s easy.”
“Which is why things are so screwed up,” he said.
Obama
did not name President Donald Trump or any other federal or state
officials in either of his appearances. But earlier this month, he harshly criticized Trump’s handling of the pandemic as an “absolute chaotic disaster” in a call with 3,000 members of his administrations obtained by Yahoo News.
The
commencement remarks were the latest sign that Obama intends to play an
increasingly active role in the coming election. He has generally kept a
low profile in the years since he left office, even as Trump has
disparaged him. Obama told supporters on the call that he would be
“spending as much time as necessary and campaigning as hard as I can”
for Joe Biden, who served as his vice president.
As
he congratulated the college graduates Saturday and commiserated over
the enormous challenges they face given the devastation and economic
turmoil the virus has wrought, the former president noted the February
shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery, 25, who was killed while jogging on a residential street in Georgia.
“Let’s
be honest: A disease like this just spotlights the underlying
inequalities and extra burdens that black communities have historically
had to deal with in this country,” Obama said. “We see it in the
disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on our communities, just as we see
it when a black man goes for a jog and some folks feel like they can
stop and question and shoot him if he doesn’t submit to their
questioning.”
“Injustice
like this isn’t new,” Obama went on to say. “What is new is that so
much of your generation has woken up to the fact that the status quo
needs fixing, that the old ways of doing things don’t work.” In the face
of a void in leadership, he said, it would be up to the graduates to
shape the future.
“If the world’s going to get better, it’s going to be up to you,” he said.
It is a perilous time for the nation’s historically black colleges and universities,
which have long struggled with less funding and smaller endowments than
their predominantly white peers and are now dealing with the financial
challenges of the coronavirus. Even at the better-endowed HBCUs,
officials are bracing for a tough few years.
Obama’s
message to high school students came at the end of an hourlong
television special featuring celebrities, including LeBron James, Yara
Shahidi and Ben Platt, and was less sharp-edged than his speech to the
college graduates. He urged the young graduates to be unafraid despite
the current challenges facing the nation and to strive to be part of a
diverse community.
“Leave
behind all the old ways of thinking that divide us — sexism, racial
prejudice, status, greed — and set the world on a different path,” Obama
said.
Joe Borelli, councilman to the 51st District in New York City
Joe Borelli, councilman to the 51st District in New York City,
called for state and local government officials to start addressing
“reasonable guidelines” to reopen the Big Apple and get people back to
work. “The mayor and governor put a lot of effort into the
lockdown and securing supplies. But now, every day more families are
being bankrupted and forced on unemployment,” Borelli, a
Republican, told Fox News on Saturday. In a Friday tweet
showing pictures of crowded street corners in Manhattan, Borelli wrote:
“This is #NYC tonight. Manhattan, not a right wing backwater. People
are ready to start reopening and our businesses and workers need it. We
need to see some urgency - not blue ribbon commissions, business czars,
& bureaucracy - just reasonable guidelines that we can safely
follow.” More than 1.9 million New Yorkers have filed for
unemployment since the week of March 14, and New York City accounts for
nearly half of the state’s claims with 930,000 jobless residents,
according to the Department of Labor. “And
there’s no urgency whatsoever in addressing our financial issues. Not
to mention, the city and state are going broke and they will simply be
unable to support progressive social programs they support,” said
Borelli, who is also a Fox News commentator. New York has been the
epicenter of the coronavirus in the United States, with more than
348,000 confirmed cases and nearly 22,500 deaths, according to the
state’s Department of Health. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo,
a Democrat, laid out a four-phase plan on May 4 for how the state will
likely reopen if regions met certain health-based guidelines. On May 14, he signed an executive order extending "New York State on PAUSE"
for five of the 10 regions in New York, including New York City, until
on May 28. The other five regions in the state were allowed to start
phase one of reopening on May 15, as they had met the criteria. Speaking
during his press briefing on Saturday, Cuomo warned that there will be
an increase in coronavirus cases now that some regions are allowed to
begin partially reopening, “but you don't want to see a spike.” The New York City region has only met four out of the seven criteria required to initiate phase one. “We
are social creatures. We need to be with each other. We need to
collaborate. We need to think together. We need to experience things
together, [but] that may not be… possible for the next few months,” said
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, also a Democrat, in a Saturday press briefing. “We… have to meet the state indicators.” The
five regions still under executive order could be set to initiate phase
one of reopening on May 28, but it is unclear how likely it is that
they meet the seven requirements set by the governor in that timeframe. Plans for initiating phase two for other parts of the state have not yet been laid out. “I'm
not for a moment trying to ignore the tough challenges, the tough
questions ahead. But I'll tell you something, you get nowhere being
pessimistic,” de Blasio said Saturday. De
Blasio came under fire last month after he criticized those involved in
a large gathering at a Jewish funeral in Brooklyn. He later apologized
for his warning to the Jewish community as a whole that threatened
future arrests. "I regret if the way I said it in any way gave
people a feeling of being treated the wrong way, that was not my
intention," de Blasio said at the time. "It was said with love, but it
was tough love.” De Blasio had tweeted after police in
Williamsburg broke up the funeral of Rabbi Chaim Mertz, specifically
calling out Jews instead of only giving a general warning to the city. Fox News' Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.
The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warned Friday that the U.S. is likely to top 100,000 coronavirus deaths by the start of June -- citing a dozen forecasting models that make the grim prediction.
"CDC
tracks 12 different forecasting models of possible #COVID19 deaths in
the US. As of May 11, all forecast an increase in deaths in the coming
weeks and a cumulative total exceeding 100,000 by June 1,” CDC Director
Robert Redfield tweeted. While
the prediction is to an extent expected -- the U.S. is already on
87,530 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University -- it marks a grim
milestone in the fight against the virus. However, it is
significantly lower than the 2 million deaths the White House was warned
in January and February could result if precautions were not
implemented. But there has also been some skepticism
about the way officials are reporting deaths. Some states count
presumed coronavirus deaths along with confirmed cases under
CDC guidance issued last month. Other states don’t count those deaths. Deaths have
been classified as a COVID-19 death even after a physician or loved
ones reported otherwise. And those who died “with" COVID-19 have been
included in the count with those who died “of" COVID-19.
“I
think a lot of clinicians are putting that condition (COVID-19) on
death certificates when it might not be accurate because they died with
coronavirus and not of coronavirus,” Macomb County, Mich., Chief Medical
Examiner Daniel Spitz in an interview with the Ann Arbor News last month. Redfield’s
prediction came as the White House ramps up efforts to reopen the
country after the measures to stop the slow of the spread of the virus
sent the economy into freefall -- with the unemployment rate hitting
14.7 percent this month and expected to rise further. President Trump
on Friday announced "Operation Warp Speed" -- a new initiative aimed at
developing, manufacturing and distributing a "proven" vaccine. Trump
described the administration's plan as "a massive scientific industrial
and logistical endeavor unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project" of World War II, with the intent to rapidly develop and distribute a vaccine with help from the U.S. military and world-renowned doctors and scientists.
"We'd
love to see if we can do it prior to the end of the year," the
president said. "We think we're going to have some very good results
coming out very quickly." Fox News' Robert Gearty contributed to this report.
The state of New Jersey and Gov. Phil Murphy’s
campaign agreed Friday to pay $1 million in a lawsuit brought by a
state employee who alleged a campaign aide raped her in 2017. Katie Brennan, chief of staff of the state's housing finance agency, accused Murphy’s then-campaign chief of staff Albert Alvarez of
raping her on April 8, 2017, after Alvarez drove her home from a
campaign event while they were both working to get Murphy elected.
Alvarez left as the chief of staff of the Schools Development Authority
in October 2018 when a news account of the accusation was about to come
out. Alvarez has denied the allegations and wasn’t criminally
charged, but it sparked monthslong investigations by Murphy’s team and
lawmakers. “I
think it’s a fair and reasonable settlement. We’ve worked
collaboratively and constructively with Katie and her team to institute
meaningful reforms to support survivors in the workplace,” Murphy said,
according to NorthJersey.com. “We look forward to continuing our work on
these issues to make New Jersey a leading state for survivor-centric
policies as we have been doing now for a long time.”
"I think it’s a fair and reasonable settlement." — New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy
Gov. Phil Murphy, D-N.J., listens to President Donald Trump speak
during a meeting about the coronavirus response in the Oval Office of
the White House, Thursday, April 30, 2020, in Washington. (Associated
Press)
No money will go to Brennan, officials said: $600,000
will go to a charity she selected that helps low-income survivors of
sexual assault and $400,000 will go to pay her attorneys. As part
of the settlement, Brennan and Alvarez will have a meeting through a
facilitator and he will attend an anti-sexual harassment class. “All
survivors deserve the excellent support I had,” Brennan said in a news
release Friday. “I hope to create that support for others so that a lack
of legal representation is never a barrier to justice.” “I hope
that this can create a model program for other New Jersey survivors,”
she added. “Living in silence did not serve me or any other survivors in
this state. Speaking out gave me great strength."
"Living in silence did not serve me or any other survivors in this state. Speaking out gave me great strength." — Katie Brennan
Katie Brennan, left, chief of staff at the New Jersey Housing and
Mortgage Finance Agency, listens while testifying before the Select
Oversight Committee at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J., Dec. 4, 2018.
(Associated Press)
Brennan filed a police report at the time, but
prosecutors said no charges would be filed because of "a lack of
credible evidence." In June 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported, Brennan emailed Murphy and his wife, asking to speak with them about a "sensitive matter" that had occurred the previous year. Although
Brennan did not specify the nature of the matter, Murphy responded
within an hour and said he would schedule a meeting to talk with
Brennan, The Journal reported. “Hang in,” Murphy wrote to Brennan. “We are on it.” But the meeting never happened, and there were no ramifications for Alvarez, the paper reported. In
October 2018, both of New Jersey's legislative houses voted to
start a special commission to look into why Alvarez then scored
a $140,000-per-year job in Murphy's administration. Brennan sued
the state over its handling of her allegation, which she reported to
officials in the governor's transition and administration. She has said
the administration botched its response to her claims, which officials
have testified that they found to be credible. Alvarez
filed a countersuit alleging his reputation was destroyed by her claim.
The countersuit was resolved in the settlement. Neither party admitted
any wrongdoing. He claimed the two had a consensual encounter, according to NorthJersey.com. Fox News' Gregg Re and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
President Trump on Friday night fired the State Department’s inspector general, saying in a letter to Congress that he no longer had confidence in the Obama administration appointee. The
president’s letter did not mention Steve Linick by name but said his
removal would take effect in 30 days, The Associated Press reported. Linick,
a former assistant U.S. attorney in California and Virginia who has
held the IG position since 2013, had overseen reports that were highly
critical of the State Department's management policies since Trump took
office. His
office had also criticized several Trump appointees for their treatment
of career staff for allegedly being insufficiently supportive of Trump
and his policies, the AP reported. Last October, Fox News reported Linick had hosted a closed-door briefing on Ukraine
for aides from several congressional committees. The briefing examined
communications between Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and fired Ukrainian
prosecutor Viktor Shokin and current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko.
Linick also shared news clips and information regarding Ukrainian energy
company Burisma, Fox reported. The conversations between Giuliani and the Ukrainians were in reference to reports that former Vice President Joe Biden
had sought to have Shokin fired amid an investigation into Burisma,
whose board members included Hunter Biden, son of the former vice
president. President Trump’s July 2019 request that Ukraine’s
president investigate the Biden matter led House Democrats to impeach
the president last December on charges of abuse of power and obstruction
of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump in February. Democrats in
Congress immediately cried foul, with the chairman of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee suggesting that Linick was fired in part in
retaliation for opening an investigation into Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo. “This firing is the outrageous act of a president trying
to protect one of his most loyal supporters, the secretary of state,
from accountability,” Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said in a statement. “I have
learned that the Office of the Inspector General had opened an
investigation into Secretary Pompeo. Mr. Linick’s firing amid such a
probe strongly suggests that this is an unlawful act of retaliation.” Engel
offered no details of the alleged investigation into Pompeo, although
two congressional aides told the Associated Press the
investigation involved allegations that Pompeo may have improperly
treated staff. Linick’s removal continues a series of changes among the government’s inspectors general. In
April, Trump fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the
intelligence community, for his role in the whistleblower complaint that
led to Trump’s impeachment. Then Trump removed Glenn Fine
as acting inspector general at the Defense Department, a move that
stripped him of his post as chairman of the Pandemic Response
Accountability Committee. That panel is charged with overseeing the
allocation of more than $2 trillion in coronavirus relief funding. During
a White House briefing on the cornavirus, Trump questioned the
independence of an inspector general of the Department of Health and
Human Services over a report that said there was a shortage of supplies
and testing at hospitals. When Linick departs he will replaced by
Stephen Akard, a former career foreign service officer with close ties
to Vice President Mike Pence, a Trump administration official told the
AP. Akard currently runs the department's Office of Foreign Missions. He
had been nominated to be the director general of the Foreign Service
but withdrew after objections he wasn't experienced enough. Democrats in Congress, meanwhile, objected to the president’s move. “The
president must cease his pattern of reprisal and retaliation against
the public servants who are working to keep Americans safe, particularly
during this time of global emergency,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said
in a statement. Pelosi claimed Linick was being “punished for
honorably performing his duty to protect the Constitution and our
national security.” Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., chairman of the
House Foreign Affairs Committee, suggesting Linick was fired in part in
retaliation for opening an unspecified investigation into Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo. “This
firing is the outrageous act of a president trying to protect one of
his most loyal supporters, the secretary of state, from accountability,”
Engel said in a statement. “I have learned that the Office of the
Inspector General had opened an investigation into Secretary Pompeo. Mr.
Linick’s firing amid such a probe strongly suggests that this is an
unlawful act of retaliation.” Engel offered no details of the
alleged investigation into Pompeo, but Linick's office had issued
several reports critical of the department’s handling of personnel
matters, including accusing some of Trump’s appointees of retaliating
against career officials. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
A Democratic congressman from Nevada admitted Friday that he was involved in “a previous relationship outside of my marriage.” U.S. Rep. Steven Horsford – a married man with three children who represents the state’s 4th Congressional District
-- acknowledged the affair after a former intern to former Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid revealed she is “Love Jones,” the focus of a
podcast series called “Mistress for Congress.” “It is true that I
had a previous relationship outside of my marriage, over the course of
several years,” Horsford said Friday, according to the Las Vegas
Review-Journal. “I’m
deeply sorry to all of those who have been impacted by this very poor
decision, most importantly my wife and family. Out of concern for my
family during this challenging time, I ask that our privacy is
respected.”
"I’m deeply sorry to all of those who have been impacted by this very poor decision, most importantly my wife and family." — U.S. Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev.
The
woman’s real name is Gabriela Linder and she told the Review-Journal
that she and the congressman were engaged in an off-and-on sexual
relationship between 2009 and 2019. (Horsford married his wife in 2000.) When
they first met, she was 21 and Horsford was the 36-year-old majority
leader of the Nevada state Senate. (He is now 47.) She said she wants
her story to be a warning for other young women about relationships with
older men in positions of power. “He knew how in love with him I
was, and he knew what he could do and get away with," she told the
newspaper. “He knows I would support him. He never told me to keep
quiet. He didn’t have to. He knew I was loyal to a fault."
“He knew how in love with him I was, and he knew what he could do and get away with." — Gabriela Linder, aka 'Love Jones'
Linder
never worked for Horsford, but said on her podcast that he provided job
referrals and “financial support” over the years, the newspaper
reported. She added that she had no knowledge of Horsford ever
misusing campaign funds or money from his state Senate or congressional
offices to pay for anything for her. On April Fools’ Day,
Horsford appeared on a YouTube program hosted by Linder’s young son but
the woman told the newspaper that Horsford is not the boy’s father.
Linder and Horsford stopped speaking after the YouTube show, though the
reason was unclear, the report said. She said she launched the
podcast series as “an empowering journey” away from the relationship and
is also writing a book about their time together. She also claims that
no one offered her money to produce the podcast, and she was not
prompted by any of Horsford’s opponents as he seeks reelection. Linder
told the newspaper she thinks Horsford should withdraw from the race
for misrepresenting himself to voters as “a family man and man of God.” “He should take a step back, atone, and if people are satisfied, then he can come back into politics,” she told the Review-Journal.
“He should take a step back, atone, and if people are satisfied, then he can come back into politics.” — Gabriela Linder, aka 'Love Jones'
In
February, Horsford appeared on Fox News to announce his endorsement of
Democrat Joe Biden for president after a poll showed Biden losing
support from African-Americans. "I am supporting Joe Biden for president because he is vetted, he is trusted and he has delivered,” Horsford said at the time.