Presumptuous Politics

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Here's the Tweet That Obliterates All the Anti-Elon/Trump Protests Today

I don’t need to elaborate much on today’s anti-Trump/Elon Musk protests. I don’t care. It’s not a big deal. It’s another massive coping exercise for people who don’t understand why they lost the 2024 election. No doubt, the media coverage is going to magnify and make these whine fests something more than they are. The reality is that all these protests were in deep blue enclaves, and they weren’t well-attended.

It's not like during the first Trump presidency—liberal America has been thoroughly gutted by 2024. They’ll never admit it, but actions do speak louder than words. Even here, there’s not much, except for recycled chants and slogans that don’t work anymore. Trump is back. The Democrats need a new playbook, and they have nothing, no adjustments. Zilch.

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) April 5, 2025
— Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹 (@saras76) April 5, 2025

Here's the tweet that exposed this political circus:

Notice where today’s protests happened—and where they didn’t. They were in deep-blue cities like Chicago, NYC, D.C., and Boston. But in working-class swing-state communities, turnout was weak. This isn’t a national movement—it’s libs working through the 5 stages of grief.

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) April 5, 2025

In a city where 1.9 million people voted for Kamala Harris, you found 10,000 to march against Trump… really incredible work https://t.co/BNrVkROSQq

— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) April 5, 2025

And then the clowns who can’t even explain the meaning behind their protest signs:

HOLY SH*T!

Watch as an anti-Trump “protester” struggles to explain the meaning behind his sign, then pulls out a paper with anti-Trump talking points that were handed to him along with the sign by protest organizers.

pic.twitter.com/UGbHqkLcI8

— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) April 5, 2025

And it still identifies as a gulf... not a river or ocean https://t.co/0Joa55MjgQ

— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) April 5, 2025

No, this isn’t bigger than the Tea Party in 2010. Dear lord. Now, everyone, go back to enjoying your weekend.

It’s very obvious.

Whatever is happening in the streets right now is much more massive than the Tea Party.

— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) April 5, 2025

These people need to get a life:

It’s almost like it’s all about playing dress up, virtue signaling, and narcissism.
pic.twitter.com/uRFhWBgi9m

— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) April 6, 2025

***

Here's your palate cleanser: 

— Clown World ™ 🤡 (@ClownWorld_) April 4, 2025

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Vance Blasts Media, Dems for Outrage Over Deportation of Alleged MS-13 Gang Member

Vice President JD Vance blasted Democrats and the media over their outrage at the deportation of "Maryland father" Kilmar Abrego Garcia,

Trump Administration Must Return Man Sent to El Salvador Prison in Error,  Judge Rules - WSJ

(Play with fire, you get burnt.)

 an alleged MS-13 gang member.

"Back in 2019, an immigration judge looked at all the evidence, looked at the data and concluded that this allegedly innocent person that we sent to El Salvador was actually a member of an MS-13 gang,” Vance told Fox News. “He had also committed some traffic violations. He had not shown up for some court dates. This is not exactly ‘Father of the Year’ here. This is a person that we don't think should be in our country.”

“Not even the crazy left-wing media criticized the idea that we could deport this person," he continued. "They just took issue with the reasoning for why we deported this person." 

The White House remained firm in their decision to deport Abrego Garcia following a report from The Atlantic that federal attorneys said that there was an "administrative error" in bringing him to CECOT men’s prison in El Salvador.

Court filings also show Abrego Garcia came to the U.S. in 2011 at the age of 16 after fleeing gang threats in El Salvador, the outlet reported. 

Eight years later, a judge granted him a form of protected status known as "withholding of removal" after finding that he would likely be a target of Salvadoran gangs if deported to his native country.

News of his deportation ignited outrage among Democrats, leaving Vance to blast the group for allegedly showing more sympathy toward illegal immigrants than for murdered U.S. citizens like Georgia nursing student Laken Riley and Texas native Jocelyn Nungaray. (Fox News)

Vance said the administration will continue with its deportation efforts regardless of the pushback.

"We do not ask permission from far-left Democrats before we deport illegal immigrants. We do the American people's business," he said. 

"This is such a weird, mistaken placement of priorities… What is it about congressional Democrats that get more angry at deporting violent gang members than they do at the victims of those violent gang members? I don't even understand where they're coming from. They've gone off the deep end, and they've got to come back to reality."

On Friday, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to return Abrego Garcia. 

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Gov. Newsom Urges Global Trade Partners To Lift Tariffs Specifically On California Exports

Mr. Greasy Hair Gel want a be president.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced a new plan for California to have “strategic” relationships with countries announcing retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. to exclude the state’s products from their retaliatory taxes. 

On Friday, Newsom (D-Calif.) made his announcement in a video posted on social media.

“Donald Trump’s tariffs do not represent all Americans,” Newsom said. “And on behalf of 40 million Americans that live in the great state of California, the tentpole of the U.S. economy … the dominant manufacturing state in America, our state of mind is around supporting stable trading relationships around the globe.”

He added he’s directed his administration to seek out new opportunities to “expand trade” and “remind trading partners around the world that California remains a stable partner.”

TO OUR TRADING PARTNERS AROUND THE GLOBE — California is here and ready to talk.

We will not sit idly by during Trump’s tariff war.

We make up 14% of the US GDP. We're the 5th largest economy in the world. 

We’re not scared to use our market power to fight back against the… pic.twitter.com/yTfbcWW1sO

— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) April 4, 2025

According to Fox News Digital, sources in Newsom’s administration told the outlet that the statement was a direct response to President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff plan, which includes a 10% baseline levy on all imports to the United States and greater percentages for other major traders.

The outlet reported that the Newsom administration is concerned that California’s almond sector, a key agricultural exporter, would lose billions of dollars when countries such as China, India, and the European Union implement retaliatory tariffs.

According to a Newsom official, the new Trump tariffs will also have an impact on access to vital goods such as construction materials required to rebuild following the Los Angeles wildfires. The United States presently imposes a tariff of more than 14% on Canadian timber, with the rate potentially increasing to over 27% by 2025.

State officials claim that retaliatory tariffs will cause “major disruptions” to cross-border supply chains in the California-Baja region, arguing that taxing component goods each time they cross the border will raise the final price of the finished product, which will be passed on to Californians.

Trump said Thursday leaving the White House that “the markets are going to boom.”

“The stock is going to boom, the country is going to boom, and the rest of the world wants to see if there is any way they can make a deal,” he said. 

“This is one of the most important days, in my opinion, in American history. It’s our declaration of economic independence. For years, hard working American citizens were forced to sit on the sidelines as other nations got rich and powerful, much of it at our expense,” Trump said. “But now it’s our turn to prosper, and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt, and it’ll all happen very quickly.”

According to the Constitution, individual states do not have the legal authority to negotiate or make global trade agreements involving tariffs.  The federal government has exclusive authority over trade policy, including tariffs.  Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution specifically allows Congress the authority to regulate commerce with other nations, including the ability to apply tariffs and negotiate trade agreements.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts


 

 

Karmelo Anthony’s Attorney Argues Austin Metcalf’s Death Could’ve Been ‘Self-Defense’, Will Seek Reduction Of $1M Bond

(L) Austin Metcalf. (Photo via: Jeff Metcalf) / (R) Karmelo Anthony. (Photo via: Collin County Jail)
(L) Austin Metcalf. (Photo via: Jeff Metcalf) / (R) Karmelo Anthony.

The lawyer for Karmelo Anothony, the 17-year-old accused of murdering Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet, has insisted that he does not have “any reason” to think his client was not acting “in self defense” and will request his bond to be lowered. 

After briefly meeting with the teenager on Friday afternoon, Anthony’s attorney Deric Walpole

DKW Defense | Legal defense

 told NBC Dallas-Fort Worth that he believes his client acted in self-defense when he thrust a knife into Metcalf’s heart, as Anthony allegedly told police during his arrest.

“I know that my client said it was self defense. I don’t have any reason to disbelieve that, but I need to develop facts, talk to people, and figure out what’s going on before I make any statements about what I think happened,” Walpole told the outlet. “I don’t have any reason to think it wasn’t self defense at this time.”

Walpole also stated that he has requested a hearing next week to reduce Anthony’s bond, which might increase the likelihood of his pretrial release.

Anthony has been held in the Collin County Jail on a seven-figure bond since being charged with fatally stabbing Metcalf, also 17, and leaving him to die in his twin brother’s arms at an athletic event in Frisco on Wednesday morning.

The stabbing began when Metcalf, a Memorial High School junior, requested Anthony, a Centennial High School student, to move from underneath Memorial’s pop-up tent during a rain delay — and Anthony refused, according to an arrest report.

Anthony unzipped a bag, reached inside and told Metcalf, “touch me and see what happens,” a witness told police.

According to authorities, Metcalf “grabbed Anthony to tell him to move and Anthony pulled out … a black knife and stabbed Austin once in the chest.”

Metcalf’s twin brother, Hunter, raced to Austin’s rescue but was unable to save him.

“I put my hand on [his chest], tried to make [the bleeding] stop, and I grabbed his head and I looked in his eyes. I just saw his soul leave. And it took my soul, too,” Hunter told Fox News in an emotional interview the following day.

Anthony tried to get away but was quickly arrested. 

“I’m not alleged, I did it,” Anthony confessed to police as he was being taken into custody, according to the arrest report.

“I was protecting myself,” Anthony allegedly told cops. “He put his hands on me.”

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts


 

Saturday, April 5, 2025

CartoonDems


 








Supreme Court Backs Trump on Teacher Training Grant Cuts Over DEI

Trump asks Supreme Court for OK to cut teacher-training money as part of  anti-DEI push

The  Supreme Court allowed President Donald Trump's administration to proceed with millions of dollars of cuts to teacher training grants - part of his crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives - in a setback on Friday to eight Democrat-led states that have challenged the policy.

The court put on hold Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's March 10 order requiring the Department of Education to reinstate in those states funding for grants under two teacher training programs while litigation in the case continues.

The eight states - California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Wisconsin - sued after the Department of Education announced on February 17 that it had cut $600 million in teacher training funds that were promoting what it called "divisive ideologies" including diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, or DEI.

Joun decided that the administration likely violated a U.S. law called the Administrative Procedure Act governing federal agency actions given that the Department of Education abruptly terminated grants awarded under programs authorized by Congress without providing individualized analyzes of the programs.

The Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator grant programs were established to help support institutions that recruit and train educators in a bid to address critical teacher shortages, especially in rural and underserved communities.

The Republican president and officials in his administration have accused various judges who have issued rulings impeding his policies of overstepping their authority. The Justice Department told the Supreme Court in its request that in this case and others, federal judges are impermissibly micromanaging the government's spending decisions.

Grant recipients received a standardized letter notifying them that the Department of Education does not support programs or organizations that promote DEI "or any other initiatives that unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or another protected characteristic."

Without an order to restore the funding, "dozens of programs upon which public schools, public universities, students, teachers and faculty rely will be gutted," Joun wrote in his temporary restraining order.

Trump and his adviser Elon Musk have moved to dismantle the Education Department as part of their plan to slash the federal workforce and reshape the government. Trump on March 20 signed an executive order as a first step "to eliminate" the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives.

Completely abolishing the department would require an act of Congress, and Trump currently lacks the votes for that.

The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices he appointed during his first term.


 

Winsome Sears Gets a 'Trump in Heels' Primary Challenger in VA Governor's Race, As Dems Crown Nominee

Whenever I write about politics here in my home state of Virginia, I like to remind readers that it's always an election year in the Commonwealth. The second a presidential or midterm campaign season closes, our gubernatorial or state races begin. The fundraising texts ramp up and the mailboxes once again are filled with mailers. It's exhausting.

This year, we have a gubernatorial election to replace our Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, who, sadly, cannot run for two consecutive terms. Youngkin caught lightning in a bottle in 2021, coming from out of nowhere to not only win in a crowded primary field, but also capture a Governor's Mansion that hadn't had a Republican in residence for nearly a decade. He did it by siding with parents who were outraged at the teachers' union-led COVID school closures while also smarting at the many hard-left school boards who were pushing radical agendas and silencing parents.

Although Youngkin prevailed four years ago, it's hard for Republicans to win state-wide in Virginia. Northern Virginia (NoVA) is a hotbed of leftism due to the large number of federal workers who reside there; Elon Musk and DOGE are only going to make the NoVA headwinds blow that much harder in 2025. Richmond, like most Democrat-run cities, is currently in the "lost cause" category for the GOP, and the Virginia Beach area can't seem to make up its mind what it is politically. 


MORE: Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears Makes Her Next Move and It's Big

More Fun With Winsome Sears as She Disarms Bill Maher on the Subject of Guns


Like the United States at large, the population centers of Virginia decide the elections, despite the fact that, acreage-wise, the vast majority of the state is red. And here's a hard truth for the GOP: Donald Trump, Elon Musk and DOGE aren't going to play well in the population centers. The good news, of course, is that if DOGE clears out enough of NoVA's federal workforce, the state will come back into balance and once again be competitive for Republicans.

The state of this year's governor's race came into clearer focus on Thursday, which was the deadline for those wishing to run in the primaries to submit their 10,000 petition signatures for their name to appear on the ballot. Democrat Abigail Spanberger, the hard-left former Congresswoman whose seat was filled by the odious Eugene Vindman, apparently submitted 40,000 signatures and locked up the Democrat nomination. Republican Winsome Sears, current lieutenant governor of Virginia, also met the threshold, as did Amanda Chase, a former state representative who calls herself "Trump in heels."

So, the Virginia GOP has itself a primary race, but the real race between Sears and Chase might actually be for Donald Trump's endorsement. There's no assurance he will endorse in this primary, of course, but Sears has some ground to make up with the president. Back in 2022, she joined a chorus of voices on the right who were calling on Trump to not run again in 2024, which led to him post on Truth Social that Sears had "turned on the MAGA movement." 

Endorsements have poured in for Sears, and her fundraising machine has been hard at work since last year, so it's her primary to lose. Be on the lookout for whether or not Donald Trump decides to get involved.

As for the unopposed Abigail Spanberger, she's busy trying to portray herself as a moderate while wracking up donations from lefty donors like Reid Hoffman. Parents might remember that, back in the COVID days, she advocated for keeping public schools closed until all staffers had been vaccinated. Needless to say, she's a darling of the teachers' unions.

Spanberger is also a fan of abortion and has been endorsed by Planned Parenthood. While still in Congress, she voted against the Laken Riley Act, which enabled the Trump administration to take an MS-13 leader off the streets of Virginia last week, and for the Equality Act, which opened the door for men to compete in women's sports. She once wanted illegals counted in the U.S. census, which would favor Democrats if legislative boundaries were ever redrawn, and has happily celebrated "Trans Visibility Day."

Virginia Republicans have a fight ahead of them, but the race is far from over. Winsome Sears enters the primary as the frontrunner, but Amanda Chase won’t go down without a fight—especially if she can capture Trump's endorsement. Meanwhile, Spanberger will try to mask her far-left record under the guise of "moderation," but Virginians remember her COVID-era school policies, her alignment with the radical left on immigration and gender ideology, and her deep ties to Democrat mega-donors. 

So, who's ready for another election season?

Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

 

Thoughts About China Attacking Taiwan...

I think China will attack Taiwan at some point in the near future. Near future is a relative term, of course, because it could mean anything from next weekend to five years from now. But they are sending all the right signals and doing all the right things to foreshadow their intentions. They want that island badly, and they're probably not going to go away without trying to take it. At least as long as Xi is still breathing.

So, I guess the first question I have is, "Why didn't they do it while Biden was president?" He was weak, probably compromised by Chinese money, and was certainly non compos mentis Seemed like a prime opportunity for them, but I surmise that they simply didn't feel that the time was right. I doubt that they really care who's POTUS because I don't think they have much fear of the US military. Biden may have done nothing, or he may have done something in the event of an attack. Apparently, it didn't matter much to them. Trump will certainly do something, but again, based on their recent activities, they don't care what he'll do either. They have their own plans that will run on their own timetable. And they seem to be full of confidence in their abilities.

What's Holding China Back?

So, at times like this, I cannot help but wonder what's holding them up? Anybody who has read more than two Tom Clancy novels has a little part of themselves that says, "Hey, I can figure this out too!" After all, he got his initiation into the world of spy/military writing by wargaming and reading history books. He didn't have a formal background in military planning, but he talked to people who did, and he had a great mind for figuring stuff out. Well before the end of his life, military experts were coming to him with questions and opinions. I'm certainly not on that level, but I admit I do like to dabble. So before anybody flames me for being a know-nothing armchair quarterback, understand that I realize my experience and knowledge are very limited, but I am willing to learn. 

China is a large country that is obsessed with taking over a small country. This small country has chips. Lots and lots of chips, but these aren't chips that they can't make themselves, so it isn't about chips, or natural resources, or anything like that. I don't think anyway. Breakaway province and all of that, but I think, as these things usually are, it's simply about nationalism, hegemony, and power. They have a fair amount of money, and they want to use it to flex muscle by extending cheap loans to countries that can never pay them back. Which means they want to force some foreclosures in the future. Which means they want global assets to secure global aims.

Okay, so back to my other question: What are they waiting on? Only they know, but it could be a number of things. I'd like to contemplate some of the possibilities here. Maybe they are still testing reaction times with their encroachment into Taiwanese airspace. Every time they compel the ROCAF to take off and respond, they're putting wear and tear on Taiwanese jets and pilots. Parts burn out that can't be replaced right away, and pilots get fatigued. Sounds kind of frivolous, but it turns out this is a real thing.

The Challenge of Landing Troops

Maybe they're still working on the problem of landing hundreds of thousands of troops on the Taiwanese coast. The Chinese have always relied on mass quantities of men to achieve their military goals. Korea, everybody knows that story. And for a story not everybody does, see Vietnam in 1979. The Chinese launched a punitive attack (for Hanoi's decapitation of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, a Chinese ally) with 600,000 troops. The People's Liberation Army occupied a sizable portion of northern Vietnam, stuck around for a couple of months, lost around 26,000 dead, and then just up and left. They wanted to send a message that they could come in anytime they desired and do anything they wished. We want that new car in the showroom. We don't care how much it costs. So today, with Taiwan, they aren't going to care about the cost either, but they will care about the logistical problems of getting enough people on the island to saturate its defenses and absorb it like The Borg.

There are problems. The undersea shelf that Taiwan sits on is kind of shallow on the western side (facing China), and it actually has few beaches that aren't full of rocks, cliffs, and other such obstacles... on all coasts. If you want your landing craft to avoid destruction, you probably want some water under that keel because of mines, traps, and tides. If you want your troops to get a beachhead, terrain that favors your enemy is going to slow you down. Especially if your plans are reliant on pushing huge quantities of men onto that beach before they can be blown up by artillery, missiles, or bombs while massed there. So maybe they're in the process of working that out. Or it could be that they're still building the number of landing craft that they think they'll need. Might be that.

Right now, they're building some very interesting self-propelled landing barges that analysts are likening to the Mulberry harbors the Allies employed during the Normandy invasion. Think of Speed Racer's car up on the automatic jacks....only a lot bigger. And they come in three sizes. It's believed that they have 3-5 of these things, and they can move up and down with the tides by crawling vertically on their support pylons as needed. These have "bailey bridges" up to about 430' long that will reach over poor terrain from which to offload vehicles and men. I think if you're China, there's only one reason for constructing these. I guess a good question would be, how many of these will they need to carry out a successful invasion?

Vulnerabilities at Sea

Anyway, an invasion force of that size is going to have to be supplied by sea, which, of course, will be very exposed to US submarine attack. China has submarines of its own, slightly fewer than we do, but not nearly as capable. Most of those are diesel/electric, which means they have to surface about every 48 hours to recharge their batteries. A significant vulnerability. Ours are all nuclear. They never have to pop up in the daylight, if at all.  It's also interesting that the Chinese don't seem to be placing a lot of emphasis on producing submarines for an upcoming war effort. It's true that they're developing boats like the Type 095, which is supposed to have a water jet propulsion instead of standard props to keep noise levels down, as well as a lot of other whiz bangs, but that's a completely new class under construction and likely won't show up for work anytime soon. But right now, they are trying to sell submarines (that you would think they'd want to keep for a new war) to countries like Thailand and India. I think that's a little odd. Especially when they trail us in capability and generally rely on numbers to overcome such gaps.

When the Chinese do invade, they could lose a lot of ships, but with the largest merchant capability in the world, it may not matter how many hulls go down, but what type of cargo those hulls were carrying and how critical to their war effort those items were. Moreover, the US invests a significant amount of time and money in anti-submarine warfare (ASW). The Chinese don't. They put their efforts into anti-shipping, with most of their destroyer types emphasizing those types of weapons.

I would expect that Chinese efforts to conquer Taiwan will include resupply by air. That won't be able to deliver the numbers they need, and it will be a supplemental effort to a sealift as with many historic invasions. Transports are not stealthy, nor are they fast, so one can expect an attrition rate on those from either land-based missiles or fighter planes. But being a stone's throw away from home, Chinese airpower is certainly going to have the numbers to favor their efforts. Especially if the claims about their hypersonic missiles are true and will keep our carriers with their fighter wings loitering out around Guam. I don't know if there's really any reliable information about either their capabilities or our defenses against those. Maybe someone on here can enlighten. But an airlift will require that runways be captured at some point because resupply by parachute isn't ever going to be as effective. 

So now I guess it's time to look at the people involved. I'm not going to consider the US Navy right now because of the hypersonic missile threat. If it's as real as some analysts believe, and we have no effective defense against them, I'm not sure pushing them into the South China Sea is going to be a great course of action. You don't want to turn your best capital ships into floating hotels that never see their intended purpose (Tirpitz, Yamato, Musashi), but then again, you don't want to waste them (and the 5,000 men and women who crew them) on a fight they have no defense against. So I guess for us, that leaves the silent service. American submarine crews have a very long history and a very long learning curve of how to do things right. The Chinese don't. It's that straightforward. Those shortcomings will manifest themselves somehow in a fight, and it probably won't favor the Chinese Navy-Army, Army-Navy, or whatever they call it.

The Role of Airpower

I would expect the US Air Force will be showing up with bombers out of Guam and Australia and a lot of other stuff out of Japan, like fighters and surveillance. And I also expect the US Air Force will display their usual expertise and professionalism. They'll bloody some noses. I also expect that China will "punish" the Japanese for hosting the Allied war effort (I think that's how we'll look at it because Australia and Japan are probably going to get involved under the "You're Next" maxim) by extending the fight to their soil as a way to get their populations to pressure their governments toward neutrality. I don't think this will work and, at the same time, will probably invite direct airstrikes on the Chinese coast. China will saber rattle about nuclear retaliation, and Trump might respond with a typical "You want to take a swing at us that way, remember that you have 500 nukes and we have 5000." They probably think he's crazy anyway, but they do know he's unpredictable.

Anyway, back to people, particularly how the Chinese may fight. Their pilots have been aggressive to the point of ramming American surveillance aircraft. They've also done the reckless stuff that you read in the news from time to time (thumping, crazing, and near-misses). Like fighter pilots the world over, these are your Type-A personalities. I don't think any of them will shy away from a fight, and their effectiveness will come down to how well the equipment works and the numbers they put up since they have no experience. Experience in a flier counts for a lot because of rule #11. "The best pilots fly more than the others; that's why they're the best." So I think the Chinese-Air Force-Army...Navy-thing, or whatever they call that one, will show up. The actual Army is not going to be full of your Type-A personalities but a mix of everything. However, they will all be stamped from the same die. Probably very radical and very motivated. One would think they'd fight very hard because Beijing is likely telling them that Taiwan is really Chinese soil, so they're probably going to motivate the troops by saying, "You're fighting for your homeland." I think the plan will be to saturate and overcome since Beijing doesn't care how many death notices it has to send out to families. Nobody over there is going to be aware of the kinship they will share with other "gold star" mothers because Xinhua will just compartmentalize it all.

And What of the Taiwanese?

So, finally, we have the Taiwanese. I have absolutely no doubt that they will fight very hard and be extremely difficult to overcome. Taiwan is their home, Red China is their enemy, and I don't think any of them want to be subjugated and forced to live under the communist system. There are over 23 million of them, and they are all being asked to train for war on some level. I think that if they are initially overcome, they will resort to asymmetrical warfare, and given the fact that they share the physical characteristics and language of their enemy, it will be very hard for the PLA to pacify them all. As we have learned from past wars, they're difficult to win when you cannot tell your friends from your enemies. And maybe this is the main concern of the Chinese war planners. I don't know, and I don't think anyone else does either, but if Beijing is not threatened by this puzzle piece, it probably should be.

To conclude, I don't think a Chinese invasion of Taiwan is going to be a walkover. I think it will turn out to be a very bloody war of attrition and a festering wound for the Chinese. It is almost certainly going to cost them something in world trade and the state of their economy. Which right now, might just be a little bit iffy.

Editor's Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

 

U.S. Bans Diplomats From Romantic, Sexual Relations With Chinese

In a bold move to safeguard national security, the United States has implemented a ban on government personnel in China engaging in romantic or sexual relationships with Chinese citizens. This decision underscores the growing concern over espionage and influence operations by the Chinese Communist Party, which has long exploited personal connections to extract sensitive information from American officials. The policy sends a strong message: protecting the U.S. government's and its employees' integrity must come before any personal or diplomatic indulgences.  

Reports indicate that the new policy took effect in January, just before U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns concluded his tenure in Beijing and before President Donald Trump took office. The policy has not been publicly disclosed. The policy applies to all U.S. diplomatic staff, their families, and contractors with security clearances stationed at American facilities across mainland China, including Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenyang, Wuhan, and Hong Kong. It is also noted that U.S. personnel stationed outside China and those already in relationships with Chinese citizens may be exempt from the rule. 

Policies like this are not uncommon. Many agencies have long had "non-fraternization" policies regarding personal relationships. However, such policies have been kept out of the public eye since the Cold War. Individuals who violate the policy will be forced to leave China. 

The policy follows an incident in which Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) had an alleged affair with a Chinese spy. Fang Fang, also known as Christine Fang, was a suspected Chinese intelligence operative who was reportedly able to infiltrate political circles in the U.S., including establishing close connections with Swalwell during his early years in Congress. Reports suggest the Democrat and Fang cultivated a romantic relationship beyond professional interactions. Swalwell has denied any wrongdoing. 

Republicans have accused Swalwell of hiding his relationship with a Chinese spy, specifically Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). 

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Barack Obama Said What Now at a Recent College Event

Former President Barack Obama spoke at Hamilton College this week, and undoubtedly, it veered into the Trump administration. Barry gave a hypothetical speech that resonated with the liberal audience but was also astoundingly tone-deaf. It’s remarkable, really, and not in a good way.

The former president did the ‘could you imagine’ game, where he lists what the Trump administration has done that he finds disagreeable regarding pro-terrorist students in our colleges—we’re deporting them—or yanking press access to media outlets—which isn’t new.   

“Imagine if I had done any of this,” said Obama.

The issue here Barry is that you did: You spied on former Fox News reporter James Rosen, even naming his as a spy in court affidavits, you seized the phone records of a dozen Associated Press reporters, there’s palace intrigue regarding meetings with the brass of the Internal Revenue Service which led to the reported targeting of conservative non-profit groups. Mr. President, you were quite Nixonian when it came to leakers and whistleblowers, turned down more FOIA requests than any other administration in history, and your Department of Justice engaged in a prolonged and illegal spy operation against the candidate of the rival party on trumped-up and now thoroughly debunked charges of Russian collusion. 

Obama’s DOJ and Eric Holder only spied on then-Fox correspondent James Rosen, secretly seized AP phone records and rejected more FOIA requests than any administration in history.

Otherwise, great post. https://t.co/xC2BESdu5O

— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) April 5, 2025

Man, you even had secret meetings before you left on how the DOJ could keep this probe going under Trump during his first presidency. 

Mr. Obama, sit this one out, sir.

Trending on Townhall Videos

 

Trump: Indiana Senate GOP 'Should Be Ashamed of Themselves'

President Donald Trump lashed out again at the Indiana Senate's rejection of House-passed redistricting, ...