Early Trump-Iran Deal Aims to End War, Start Talks

President Donald Trump and Iran have signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at winding down their conflict and opening a 60-day negotiating window toward a broader settlement that includes limits on Iran’s nuclear program and its enriched uranium stockpile, according to Newsmax reporting and additional Agence France-Presse wire details.

The agreement is described by U.S. officials as a preliminary framework rather than a final peace deal, intended to pause escalation while both sides pursue a broader accord covering nuclear restrictions, sanctions relief, regional security arrangements, and other unresolved issues.

Newsmax reported that Iran has, in principle, agreed to curb uranium enrichment activity and expand cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors as part of a verification-based compliance process tied to any future sanctions relief.

The memorandum also reportedly addresses Iran’s existing enriched uranium stockpile, with discussions focused on monitoring, reduction, or transfer under international supervision, according to wire reporting.

The Hill reported that Trump formally signed the agreement while attending events tied to the G7 summit in France, including diplomatic meetings centered at the Palace of Versailles, where leaders gathered for a state dinner hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron.

The signing was described as part of a broader summit sequence in which the final agreement was completed during the France meetings after earlier drafting and procedural steps, according to The Hill.

A separate Newsmax global-talk report described the deal as part of a broader push to stabilize U.S.-Iran relations following months of conflict and intermittent military escalation.

The 60-day diplomatic window sets out a sequence in which Washington and Tehran are expected to negotiate the details of sanctions relief, nuclear verification, and enforcement mechanisms, with any easing of U.S. measures conditioned on verified Iranian compliance with agreed benchmarks.

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have emphasized that sanctions relief will remain strictly conditional.

According to Newsmax reporting, the deal calls for an immediate halt to hostilities, with both sides agreeing to pause military escalation as negotiations proceed.

Agence France-Presse wire reporting indicated that mediators played a key role in bridging gaps between Washington and Tehran, particularly on nuclear verification, sanctions sequencing, and security guarantees.

Those mediation efforts reportedly included multiple revisions aimed at aligning U.S. demands for strict monitoring of uranium-related activity with Iranian demands for phased economic relief.

The agreement also addresses the Strait of Hormuz, with provisions for a phased restoration of commercial shipping through the critical energy choke point after months of disruption.

Newsmax reported that maritime de-escalation is tied to broader compliance steps, including reciprocal reductions in military activity in the Gulf.

Full Speech
 

Wire reporting also noted provisions that could ease restrictions on Iranian oil exports over time, depending on compliance benchmarks tied to nuclear obligations.

The memorandum includes the possibility of unlocking limited Iranian financial assets abroad, though officials stressed that any such measures would be staged and conditional.

Oil prices fell following the announcement, with markets reacting to expectations that reduced tensions could stabilize shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and ease global supply risks.

The White House has not confirmed all reported details circulating in wire coverage, particularly regarding the scale and timing of sanctions relief and broader economic provisions.

Newsmax reporting described the deal as an initial step toward de-escalation rather than a binding treaty, leaving core disputes over nuclear limits, uranium stockpiles, sanctions architecture, and long-term enforcement to be resolved during the negotiating period.

The 60-day timeline is expected to determine whether the agreement can be converted into a lasting settlement or whether tensions will resume if talks collapse.

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 

Raided: FBI Swoops in on Soros-Backed Ohio Voting Rights Group, Seizes Electronic Devices in Fraud Probe

Billionaire financier George Soros has been linked to leftist causes in this country for years, bankrolling virtually every woke organization out there and doing his best to install soft-on-crime, criminal-loving district attorneys in cities across the nation. If you live in a big metro and don’t feel safe walking the streets after sundown, there’s a good chance Soros is to blame.

Now the feds are investigating a Soros-aligned voter mobilization organization for fraud:

Federal investigators executed search warrants at the headquarters of a Soros-aligned voter mobilization organization in Ohio as part of what sources described as an ongoing fraud investigation.

FBI agents searched the offices of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative on June 11 and conducted interviews with members of the organization across the state, according to reports. Some agents reportedly served subpoenas or sought to seize electronic devices during the operation.

Multiple sources familiar with the matter later told CBS News that the federal action was tied to a fraud-related investigation.

The Department of Justice declined to discuss the specifics of the case.

OOC is a nonprofit that works with the Ohio Democratic Party on voter mobilization, registration efforts, and ballot referendums. Soros and other wealthy leftie donors keep its bank accounts full.

Left-wing groups are already crying foul, although I can’t see how this development “dilutes their votes.” Either you filled out your ballot or you didn't:

DOJ officials did not release details of the investigation, but said:

"Search warrants are authorized by a judge and anything said by any organization or others in the media is unfounded speculation, as the target of any investigation is not privy to the search warrant affidavit until after indictment," a DOJ official told Fox News Digital.

---

RELATED: California’s Primary Elections Again Show the Need for Election Reform AND a Strategy to Win

Watch: Hillary Clinton Manages to Insult More People With Her New Comments on Redistricting, Voter ID

---

There’s big money involved:

Tax records show the organization reported more than $10 million in revenue during 2024. Funding for the group has come from several major Democratic-aligned organizations and labor unions, including entities connected to the Soros family, the New Venture Fund, the Tides Foundation, the American Federation of Teachers and the Service Employees International Union.

According to the report, the Soros family’s Foundation to Promote Open Society provided approximately $1.9 million to the organization between 2019 and 2020. The Open Society Action Fund later contributed an additional $1 million to a related organization in 2021 and another $1 million in 2023.

It always galls me when investigating left-wing outfits only to find that teachers' unions are big donors. What the hell does this have to do with educating our children, and how did we come to a place where this is OK?

The Left is up in arms over the investigation, but we don’t yet know what evidence the DOJ is acting on. The group has had questionable incidents in the past, so we’ll see if their cries of innocence pan out or if they have dipped their hands in the mud.

 

‘Send Them Back’ Chants Erupt After EU Parliament Overwhelmingly Passes ‘Strictest-Ever’ Migration Law

Members of the European Parliament erupted in chants of “Send Them Back!” moments after the chamber overwhelmingly approved what is being called the EU’s 'strictest-ever' migration and return law on Wednesday.

 

This marks a major policy shift in Europe. It follows years of uncontrolled illegal crossings and relentless public pressure. That pressure translated to significant gains for conservative and populist parties in recent elections.

Right-wing and center-right MEPs exemplified the energy and desire for change as chants rang out on the floor of the parliament chamber.

"Send them back!" indeed. This is an incredible display.

---

READ MORE: Europe Ends Open Borders Era: New Laws Echo Trump's Policies

Democrats Claim to Want to Live Outside the United States, but Their Feet Tell a Different Story

---

Euronews has described the legislation as the EU’s “strictest-ever” migration law, reflecting its significant tightening of return procedures after years of low deportation rates. It's shades of President Trump coming in and laying down the law after years of Biden's open-border policies.

A border security revolution for Europe.

Magnus Brunner, the EU's commissioner for migration, said the law "tells everybody that it is us and not the smugglers deciding who can stay in the European Union and who must leave."

“This is a historic step for Europe and proof that change is possible,” said right-wing French MEP François-Xavier Bellamy. “We are not condemned to powerlessness.”

Naturally, the left-wing politicians were less enamored with the overwhelming passage of the measure. They countered the chants with fist-clenching oppositional incantations.

"Shame on you!" they responded.

Nay, the shame is exclusively yours.

Ana Catarina Mendes, vice-president of the Socialists and Democrats group (S&D), released a statement saying, "This regulation risks normalizing legally questionable practices that would have been unthinkable in the EU only a few years ago."

Good.

The timing could not be more pointed. Just one day earlier, a major new UK report from Restore Britain laid bare the horrific human cost of years of lax migration enforcement and failed integration.

The 218-page report pulls back the curtain on the systematic grooming and rape of thousands of British girls by organized gangs, overwhelmingly of Pakistani heritage, enabled by authorities who turned a blind eye out of fear of being labeled racist. 

 

The damning findings underscored exactly why public anger has boiled over across Europe — and why tougher deportation tools, return hubs, and an end to endless appeals are now in place.

President Trump has made direct calls for Europe to tighten its borders on several occasions.

"On immigration, you better get your act together or you’re not going to have Europe anymore. You got to get your act together," he said during a trip to Scotland last July.

It looks like they're finally doing just that.

 

Well, Well, Well... Look What the Coast Guard Dragged In

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Wednesday that on June 10, a crew with Coast Guard Station Miami Beach approached a vessel that failed to comply with orders to stop. It was about a mile south of Key Biscayne, Fla.

The Coast Guard fired warning shots, and the vessel did not heed the warning, so the Coast Guard fired shots to disable the engine. No one was injured on either side. The Coast Guard seized the vessel and towed it to the station, where  U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Air and Marine Operations (AMO) personnel stepped in to assist with the interdiction. 

So, what was on board? Only 25 Chinese nationals who were, apparently, attempting to enter the United States illegally. The reason why they were trying to get into the United States — because you never know with the Chinese — is under investigation. 

By land or sea, our borders are CLOSED.

Last week, a @USCG crew out of Station Miami Beach encountered and disabled a vessel carrying 25 Chinese nationals attempting to enter our nation illegally. @CBP and @CBPAMO assisted following the interdiction, and @HSI_HQ initiated a… pic.twitter.com/KuN14qM0fn

— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) June 17, 2026

"Last week, a Coast Guard crew out of Station Miami Beach encountered a vessel with 25 Chinese aliens attempting to illegally enter the United States," said Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis. "This sends a clear message to illegal aliens attempting to enter the United States: don’t even think about it. By land or sea, our borders are CLOSED." 

It's not clear where these people started their journey, but the Chinese testing maritime routes into South Florida, often via the Bahamas or similar staging points, is becoming an increasing pattern, especially as land border crossings into the U.S. have dwindled to practically nonexistent. The Bahamas is a particularly popular spot because it doesn't require citizens of many countries, including China, to have a visa to enter. 

Previously, many Chinese nationals attempting to enter the U.S. illegally would start in South America and cross the dangerous Darien Gap — the 60-plus-mile, mostly lawless stretch of rainforest, swamp, and mountains between Panama and Colombia. Many of those relied on smuggling operations, much like what this current situation will most likely turn out to be.  

But thanks to Donald Trump, along with Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino's efforts to close his own border with Colombia, Darien Gap crossings have fallen drastically over the last year. This is why I can't emphasize enough how important it is for us to have partners in the region who share our goals. Mulino has been a great ally to Trump and the United States, and he's a member of the Shield of the Americas.  

Something else worth noting is that under Joe Biden, there was a bit of an explosion in the number of Chinese nationals attempting to get into the United States illegally. The number went from 450 in 2021 to 2,176 in 2022 to over 24,000 in 2023. By mid-2024, the first half of the year had already surpassed 2023's numbers. Under Biden, the Chinese became the largest non-Latin American demographic attempting to sneak over our borders. 

Of course, those numbers fell significantly in 2025, but this Wednesday announcement just proves that these sophisticated smuggling networks and the incentive to come to the United States haven't changed much. Thank goodness we have an administration that is actually enforcing border security. Let's hope we keep it up. 

 

No Way CNN Did This Regarding the Algae in the Reflecting Pool?!

Wait, we’ve had months of stories about widespread fraud in Minnesota. We also have reports of Medicaid fraud in Ohio. But CNN chose to focus intensely on... the algae in the reflecting pool? 

This isn’t a credible network, and now that Paramount has acquired Warner Brothers, there’s a chance that CBS News’ editor-in-chief, Bari Weiss, might be appointed to oversee editorial decisions. It would trigger another liberal meltdown, but sorry, CNN, acting like the Japanese on Okinawa over algae is the peak of anti-Trump media stunts. 

Not only that—they had it tested:

 

To the shock of no one, it had algae in it. Like, what are we doing? They’ve already pre-treated the water with bleach. It’ll get cleaned up. I just can’t get over the fact that they had the water in the reflecting pool tested. 

What are we doing here, people?

 

G7 Summit: Trump commands global stage with viral ‘I’m The Boss’ greeting

Near the end of his trip to France, attending the G7 Summit, President Donald Trump entered a room full of world leaders, stopping to announce, “I’m the boss.”

 

During this week’s annual Group of Seven summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, President Donald Trump commandingly projected American leadership on the global stage as he met with the heads of state from France, Canada, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany.

In a moment that quickly went viral online and exemplified his presence among world leaders, Trump confidently declared, “I’m the boss” before cordially greeting French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

The bold assertion captured the signature, unapologetic style that has defined his “America First” foreign policy, signaling to both foreign dignitaries and audiences back home that the United States remains firmly in the driver’s seat of international affairs.

 

In a Truth Social post on Wednesday, Trump called the trip a “Great Success,” while stressing the importance of the peace deal his administration signed with Iran over the weekend, shortly before the summit began.

“The trip was a Great Success but, mostly what people wanted to talk about, is the fact that Iran will not have a Nuclear Weapon, and that the Strait of Hormuz will immediately be opened!” Trump stated before returning to the topic of the G7 event.

 

“Great Numbers in all categories for the United States Economy with more people working today than have ever worked before. Over 19.1 Trillion being invested in the U.S.A. with Factories and everything else happening,” he wrote, adding, in another reference to the Iran deal, “importantly, recent Stock Market numbers are through the roof because of the settlement and, likewise, Oil Prices are tumbling down!”

 

While the freshly minted U.S.–Iran ceasefire dominated the summit’s initial agenda, the Russia-Ukraine war quickly took center stage as President Trump engaged in separate discussions regarding future peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Following Trump’s Truth Social announcement, the president also attended a one-on-one dinner with Macron at the Palace of Versailles to symbolize the close historical relationship between France and the U.S. as it celebrates the 250^th anniversary of its independence. Some reports noted that Trump was the first U.S. president in decades to be hosted individually at Versailles in such a manner, showing Macron’s efforts to maintain a strong relationship with Washington.

 

MP Rupert Lowe: Inquiry alleges 250K victims, Muslim-linked offenders

 The secretly funded, survivor‑led Rape Gang Inquiry chaired by MP Rupert Lowe has dropped a bombshell report that Britain can’t afford to ignore. The 219‑page document — loudly billed on its own site as “250,000+ victims. 149 districts. Decades of failure.” — lays out a picture of organized child sexual exploitation and long‑running institutional failure. Whether you treat every number as gospel or as an alarm bell, the release has already forced police and politicians to act, and it should force every parent and local leader to wake up.

What the Rape Gang Inquiry actually claims

The Lowe report collects survivor testimony, court records and local investigations and says organised group sexual exploitation has been widespread across many districts for decades. The inquiry attributes a high share of offenders in the cases it examined to men of Muslim background, often of Pakistani heritage, and says that police, councils, schools and licensing authorities repeatedly failed victims. It recommends tough measures: a new Childhood Sexual Exploitation Act, national prosecuting units, deportation powers for foreign nationals convicted of these crimes, a national compensation scheme for survivors, and criminal penalties for officials who ignored clear warning signs.

Official response: NCA reviews and a statutory inquiry

Don’t mistake this private report for the government’s statutory probe. The Lowe inquiry is crowdfunded and survivor‑led, while the official machinery is moving in parallel: the National Crime Agency has launched Operation Beaconport to review closed group‑CSE files and police forces have been told to reopen some cold cases. The government has already commissioned a national audit and set up a statutory inquiry led by Baroness Anne Longfield. In short: private investigators have sounded the alarm, and public agencies are now scrambling to follow through with powers only they have — arrests, prosecutions and compulsion of evidence.

 

Numbers matter — and so do the questions about how they were made

Here’s where plain honesty is required. The dramatic “250,000+ victims” headline comes from Lowe’s report and its extrapolations from hotspot inquiries; it is an asserted estimate, not a fresh, independently verified national total. Fact‑checking organisations warn that you cannot reliably scale local scandals to the whole country without major uncertainty. The inquiry’s work is powerful and painful to read, but it’s also a private, political project that can’t compel testimony the way a statutory inquiry can. So we must treat the numbers as a charged claim that demands official verification — not as an excuse for anyone to shrug or play politics.

What should happen next — and who should be held to account

Words and reports are fine, but victims need action. The NCA and police must be given resources and urgency to investigate reopened files and prosecute where evidence exists. Parliament should speed the statutory inquiry, adopt legal reforms to protect children, and pass a national compensation scheme. Politicians who ignored warning signs, and officials who covered up or downplayed these crimes, should face scrutiny and, if warranted, sanctions. If serious reform and justice don’t follow, then the only thing worse than the crimes will be the continued arrogance of a ruling class that prefers excuses to accountability — and British families deserve better than that.

Leaked $300B Iran Line Ignites Cruz vs Donald Trump Jr. Showdown

The big story this week isn’t just another Beltway squabble. It’s a leaked one‑page, 14‑point memorandum of understanding that senior U.S. officials read aloud to reporters — and it contains a line that sent every hawk and skeptic in Republican circles sprinting to their keyboards: a plan for “at least USD 300 billion” for Iran’s reconstruction. That draft, and the very public back‑and‑forth between Sen. Ted Cruz and Donald Trump Jr., turned a fragile diplomatic moment into a political firefight overnight.

What leaked: the 14‑point MOU and the Strait of Hormuz fix

The circulated text lays out a short roadmap to pause hostilities and open a 60‑day window for technical talks. It talks about reopening commercial passage through the Strait of Hormuz, sequencing sanctions relief, and committing the parties to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons — with the finer points to be worked out later. The most explosive sentence — the reconstruction figure — is the one everyone quoted because, well, numbers stick to headlines the way oil sticks to a tanker.

Cruz vs. Don Jr.: receipts, rhetoric, and political theater

Sen. Ted Cruz publicly warned conservatives: don’t hand Iran a Marshall Plan that could be turned against Americans. Donald Trump Jr. fired back on the same platform, bluntly saying, “We’re not giving them a cent,” and accusing Cruz of pushing “fake news” that undermines President Donald Trump. The spat is more than gossip. It exposes a serious split in how Republicans will police the terms of a deal that trades the quiet of diplomacy for political heat at home.

The $300 billion question: who actually pays?

Here’s where plain talk matters. The draft’s $300 billion line could mean many things: a coordinated regional package, private investment, frozen assets unlocked, or — the nightmare scenario — direct U.S. appropriations. The administration insists it won’t be “putting up ten cents,” and some accounts say a private vehicle is intended. Fine. But intent and legal obligation are different beasts. Republicans on Capitol Hill, led by the likes of Sen. Cruz, should demand to see the ledger, the legal text, and the enforcement language before anyone calls this a victory lap.

We should want peace. But we should demand accuracy before we crown a deal or torpedo it. If the MOU truly ties sanctions relief or access to frozen funds to verifiable safeguards, that’s one thing. If the wording leaves Washington writing blank checks — even indirectly — conservatives must roar. The public spat between a senator and a president’s son is noisy, yes, but it serves a use: it forces transparency. Vice President JD Vance and the White House owe the country plain answers about the mechanics and the guarantees. Republicans should fight hard where facts are weak and cheer where the truth holds. That’s how you get a deal that keeps Americans safe and wins at the ballot box — or breaks cleanly when it must.

CartoonDems

 

Trump-Netanyahu Friendship Tested as US Pursues Deal With Iran

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told President Donald Trump last year that he was the "greatest friend Israel ever had in the White House."

Now, as Trump tries to finalize a deal to end the war with Iran, he's directing rhetoric toward Netanyahu the likes of which no other American leader has dared to use publicly.

He claimed credit for Israel's existence — "without me, there would be no Israel" — and questioned his judgment in interviews. He even described him as "crazy."

Netanyahu's tenure as prime minister spans four U.S. presidents, and he's frustrated all of them at one point or another. But none has voiced that as openly as Trump, who started the Iran conflict in lockstep with Netanyahu.

 

The tension comes as Trump criticizes recent Israeli attacks in Lebanon, which have threatened to jeopardize negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

Iran officials have said a new deal aimed at ending the U.S.-Iran conflict requires that Israel withdraw from Lebanon, where it has been battling Iran-backed Hezbollah militants and seizing swaths of that country. Israeli officials, in turn, have rejected the notion, a stance that threatens efforts to end the Iran war. 

Those efforts have become a powerful focus for Trump as he looks to end a war that has sown discord at home and driven up fuel costs.

"If Netanyahu gets in between something Trump really wants, and that's out of this war, he's prepared to use the leverage that he has," said Aaron David Miller, who served as an adviser on Middle East issues to Democrat and Republican administrations over two decades.

An agreement is scheduled to be signed on Friday in Geneva. Speaking on Tuesday at the annual G7 summit in France, Trump said he told Netanyahu that he's been unhappy with his recent moves.

"Without the U.S., there would be no Israel. Without me, there would be no Israel because no other president was willing to do what I did," Trump said. "I have had a great relationship with Bibi. Now Bibi has to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon."

There has long been a bipartisan consensus around supporting Israel in Washington, but that has frayed in recent years. Liberals have been increasingly critical of Israel's actions toward Palestinians, especially during the war in Gaza, and conservatives have questioned the importance of longstanding American support for Israel. There are concerns about antisemitism on the left and the right.

Trump's latest comments drew swift criticism from some left-leaning groups.

"He is framing Israel's mere existence as contingent on him," said Halie Soifer, who leads the Jewish Democratic Council of America. "It's deeply offensive to the vast majority of Jews who care about Israel's future."

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris often disagreed with Netanyahu during the war in Gaza, and sometimes they criticized him publicly. But they were more circumspect, in an effort to avoid facing accusations of being anti-Israel.

Meanwhile, conservative, pro-Israel groups were divided on the seriousness of Trump's public condemnation of Netanyahu.

Republican Jewish Coalition President Matt Brooks described Trump's criticism as little more than the inevitable disagreement among family members.

Brooks said Trump has been reliably supportive of Israel as president.

"If Biden or Harris said something critical, it came from the position of someone who was hostile toward or didn't have the same level of support for Israel that President Trump has," Brooks said.

He noted the first Trump administration's role in moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and the return of Israeli hostages from Gaza during the president's second term, among other acts.

Biden had criticized Netanyahu's handling of the war in Gaza, though Trump's criticism of Netanyahu comes with a "tremendous reservoir of goodwill on this issue that neither Biden nor Harris ever had."

Pro-Israel advocate Mort Klein. president of the conservative Zionist Organization of America, said he worried that Trump was making the comments in public to appeal to Israel critics "because he sees that Americans have become more hostile toward Israel than they've ever been."

"That worries me," Klein said.