 |
There’s one thing you can be sure of about Democrats, the regime media, and left-wing degenerates in general – they’re always going to take somebody else’s side in a fight. They’re never going to take your side. They’re never going to take the side of decent, patriotic, and normal Americans – in fact, they hate decent, patriotic, and normal Americans. Hate them. And not just a little. They cultivate a burning hatred of us, a loathing that exceeds all reason and understanding. Maybe it’s because they realize they’re freakish perverts. Maybe they recognize that they’re greedy mediocrities and desperately resent that normal people refuse to recognize them as their betters. Or maybe it’s simply that normal people are an obstacle to their power. It doesn’t matter why. It only matters that they despise you. You may
not think of them, but they’re always thinking about you and how to
hurt you. You may want to live and let live. They want to live and let
you die. How do we know? Because they tell us. It’s all over social
media. They elected a guy who wanted to watch our kids die. When that
bizarre pervert murdered Charlie Kirk, what did they do? Many of them
cheered. And many others at least had the tactical savvy to do their
cheering in their own bubble and not let us see. You’re a Nazi, a
racist, an Islamophobe, a transphobe, a fascist - whatever is the bad
thing to you, you are it. And you must pay. Every single one of their policy positions reflects that. Every single policy is aimed at helping the people who want to hurt you. Some disgusting Afghan immigrant, welcomed generously into this country and supplied with all sorts of welfare since we, of course, can’t expect Third World peasants to support themselves and must, for reasons and because, labor to subsidize their stay in our country, decided to repay our generosity by murdering one of our soldiers and wounding another. Where did the left’s sympathy lie? Was it with the young woman ambushed and murdered on the street wearing the uniform of our country? Was it the other soldier, who is still fighting for his life? No. It was with the scumbag who did it, the jihadi freak who shouted out “Allah Akbar” before he shot down our people. When Norm McDonald posted his famous tweet about the real tragedy of an ISIS nuclear attack being increased Islamophobia, it was a joke. Now it’s reality, offered irony-free by the moral lepers who posture as our moral superiors. Yeah, the real problem is that Americans are too intolerant of seventh-century savages. What about perverts? What else do you call the deviants who pretend they’re women to hang around in girls’ locker rooms? Whose side does the left take? Does it take the side of the girls or the side of the leering creeps who are drooling over the girls? They take the side of the creeps. Your girls are supposed to bear the burden of the mutants’ perversions. Your women are supposed to carry the weight of this freak show. The autogynephiles who dress like Carmen Miranda get the benefits, and you get the cost. Oh, and if you’re upset about it, they’re going to call you names; if they can, they’ll get you fired, expelled, or even persecuted. What explanation could there possibly be for siding with weirdos who pretend to be a different gender so they can touch themselves in a woman’s locker room, other than an absolute hatred of normal people? And how about illegal aliens? They come to our country, they pillage our welfare state, and a bunch of them commit terrible crimes. They’re not supposed to be here. Remember that whole thing about “Our Democracy” being important? You know, how we’re supposed to be able to vote for our own laws and govern ourselves? Well, we did that. We decided they can’t be here. We decided they have to go home. But we don’t get to do that. We get to pass laws; we just don’t get to enforce them. So, where’s “Our Democracy?” All the people babbling to you about democracy love democracy right up until the moment people like us, normal patriotic people, dare to participate in it. They always side with the illegal aliens. The regime media is particularly disgusting. Every time we see a sob story, if they mention the inevitable M. Night Shyamalan surprise twist at all in their article, it’s on paragraph 48 after 47 paragraphs of how the person is hard-working, wonderful, loving, and a contributor to society, and then you get to the last paragraph and they casually mention the guy has been convicted of axe murder, is on welfare, and had a pending deportation order – which results from that due process we hear so much about – since 2011. But we’re the bad guys. We’re the bad guys because we want the laws our elected representatives pass enforced. We’re the bad guys because we don’t want our families killed. We’re the bad guys because we want a say in what our culture is, and what we say is that we don’t want it to be like the Third World hellholes these people came from. We’re the bad guys because we don’t want to have to work to support our own families, plus support the families of people who shouldn’t be here in the first place. How about criminals? Yeah, we have an incarceration problem in America – there’s too damn little of it. Anyone else as tired as I am of seeing some young woman killed by some sick freak who’s been in and out of jail 37 times and gets freed once again by a leftist judge who feels sorry for him, and how the charges are dropped by a Soros DA who thinks the real crime problem is normal people complaining about crime. What’s their solution to crime? First, they don’t admit crime is a problem. The problem is us noticing it. But when pressed, what is their solution? Is it putting criminals in jail? No. It’s making sure that normal people don’t get to resist criminals! If you happen to fight a criminal who’s trying to hurt someone else, you’re often the one who’s going to go to jail. A bunch of scumbags break into your house and, if you shoot them, you’re the one in the dock. Yeah, their solution is to disarm the people who aren’t committing crimes to make sure they can’t stop the people who are committing crimes. But that’s not the solution to the crime problem. Like I said, they don’t think crime is a problem. They think it’s a tool. Taking our guns and our right to self-defense is their solution to the “citizens being able to defend themselves against criminals and tyranny” problem. Oh, and overseas, you can always count on them supporting the away team. According to them, you’ve got some moral obligation to at least subsidize the inter-tribal warfare between groups of people that we know little about, and who have been fighting their far-away wars for eons. The only exception is when it’s in America’s interest to support a foreign country – in that case, we absolutely cannot do it. We can never side with America! And taking your tax money to fuel the fighting is not enough. No, we know the next step because we’ve been down this road before, and we’ve seen Americans come back up that road in boxes. The next step is sending our young people – which means your sons and daughters because you know their precious Kadens and Ashlieghs aren’t going – to go fight idiotic wars that do nothing for the United States except impoverish us and kill the best of us. Every time they could stand up for us, they stand up for the people against us. They’re mad at Trump for tariffs, which were designed to get American workers to stop being victimized by unequal trade deals. They’re mad at Trump because he wants to cut off aid to ungrateful foreigners and make their transgender mind troupes pay for their own performances. They’re mad because Trump is ending DEI that discriminates against normal hard-working Americans – they will actually tell you it’s not racism if they discriminate against white people or Asians or even blacks and Hispanics who don’t tow the party line. They’re mad at Trump because his Secretary of War is killing the drug dealers who bring in the poison that murders 100,000 Americans a year. They’re mad that our sons and daughters aren’t going to OD. Wouldn’t it be nice if they got mad at someone hurting Americans, instead of at Americans who are fighting back? Is there any reasonable explanation for any of this except that they hate you? They want to destroy you. They want to break you. You are the enemy because you’re normal and patriotic and you believe in God instead of the angry weather demons. Am I overdoing it? Am I overstating the case? Is this exaggeration? Let’s do a little test. You’re a normal person. When was the last time that the establishment sided with you? When was the last time that the Democrats stood up and said, “Hey you, I’m going to protect you and yours from criminals, from perverts, and from evil foreigners both here and abroad?” When’s the last they didn’t insist that you take whatever is dished out by the criminals, the perverts, and the evil foreigners? When was the last time someone else got asked to take one for the team? I’m waiting. Just name one time, and don’t tell me about something that happened in 1945. Just name one instance where they took your side any time this century. Just one. I’m waiting. I’m going to be waiting a long time. But it doesn’t have to be this way. We don’t have to tolerate this. We don’t have to take it. They’ve got one weapon – the awesome power of whining. Here’s all we have to do: Not care what they say. Not pay attention when they cry. Not give a damn how unhappy they are that we’re standing up for ourselves, that we are prioritizing our own people, and that we are putting America First. Time to take our own side in this fight because no one else will. |
Conservative Blogger
Thursday, December 4, 2025
The Democrats Always Take Sides Against Normal People Like You
Department of War Responds to Growing GOP Wariness Over Airstrikes on Narco-Terrorists
 |
Operation Southern Spear is wiping out narco-terrorists. It’s been so successful that they’re not taking to sea as often. Rest assured, we’ll be on the lookout. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth declared yesterday that we’ve only just begun to blast people straight to hell. Democrats are in an uproar over it because potential voters are being
wasted. But some Republicans, specifically Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MI) and
Rand Paul (R-KY), are forming their own opposition to this operation.
It garnered new controversy when a boat carrying these narco-terrorists
got bombed. And then a second strike was ordered to kill off survivors.
The Washington Post tried to smear Hegseth as a war criminal, though their sloppy reporting, which included unattributed quotes to Hegseth—which is literal fake news—was corrected by The New York Times. Still, we have some shooting happening inside the ship (via The Hill):
At yesterday’s press briefing at the Pentagon, Department of War Press Secretary Kinglsey Wilson said that the strikes were legal, verified by military and civilian lawyers, and they have irrefutable evidence that everyone eliminated in these strikes was a narco-terrorist. She was asked about Wicker’s inquiry by Human Events’ Jack Posobiec: Wilson added that Hegseth and Wicker discussed the strikes, with the secretary explaining the rationale. She said that the department works closely with Republican and Democratic members of Congress to keep members of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) and Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) updated on this operation. It was a run-of-the-mill response, but there’s a showdown coming, isn’t there? Who knew blowing up narco-terrorists would create bipartisan fervor for all the wrong reasons? This town, man. |
Abbott asks Treasury Secy. Bessent to suspend tax-exempt status of CAIR and to launch probe into group
 |
Texas GOP Governor Greg Abbott has escalated his campaign against the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), formally asking U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to suspend the Muslim civil-rights organization’s federal tax-exempt status and launch an immediate investigation into its activities. In a letter sent on Monday, Abbott accused CAIR of functioning as a
direct subsidiary of the Muslim Brotherhood and a front group for Hamas,
the Palestinian terrorist group responsible for the atrocities
committed in Israel on October 7, 2023.
The request marks the latest step in Abbott’s month-long offensive against the nation’s largest Muslim advocacy group. In November, the GOP Governor signed an executive order designating CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations under Texas law — a move believed to be the first of its kind by any U.S. state. The designation triggered a state criminal probe, banned CAIR from purchasing property in Texas, and even prompted the organization to sue Abbott in federal court. Critics of CAIR have pointed to its designation as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007–2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism-financing case in U.S. history. Five defendants in that case were convicted of funneling more than $12 million to Hamas. Federal court filings described CAIR as part of a broader Muslim Brotherhood network in the United States. Several former CAIR officials have also faced terrorism-related convictions over the years, including charges of material support, money laundering, and visa fraud. Abbott’s letter highlights these connections and recent actions by CAIR’s Texas chapter, including public praise for a Dallas-area imam facing deportation over alleged Hamas ties and routing the chapter’s X (formerly Twitter) account through the Turkish App Store — a country the governor claims harbors Muslim Brotherhood affiliates. Meanwhile, CAIR has since called the move “Islamophobic retaliation,” swiftly condemning Abbott’s actions as being politically motivated. The organization’s federal lawsuit, filed last month with the Muslim Legal Fund of America, argues that Texas’ terrorist designation violates the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment due process protections, and federal supremacy over foreign affairs. Revoking 501(c)(3) status typically requires evidence that an organization has violated tax laws, such as engaging in substantial lobbying, partisan political activity, or providing material support to sanctioned entities. Soon after the announcement, conservative activists and pro-Israel groups praised Abbott’s move. Posts celebrating the letter racked up tens of thousands of engagements on X, with many calling on other Republican governors to follow Texas’ lead. |
Nick Fuentes Stirs Controversy on Segregation Debate
 |
The Trump administration’s recent actions suggest a quiet but profound shift in American education policy, effectively rolling back decades of progress toward integration in schools. Under this new direction, efforts to promote diversity and inclusion are being transformed into charges of reverse discrimination against white students, weakening enforcement mechanisms that have historically combated segregation. Moves to dismantle the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights—responsible for monitoring and addressing racial inequities—are part of a broader strategy to prioritize school choice and vouchers, echoing segregationist tactics from the past but repackaged as educational freedom. This policy shift signals a return to separation under the guise of choice, undermining the unifying principles that once made America exceptional. At the heart of
this development is the argument that the demographic transformations in
the United States have unsettled certain political and social
structures. As the country becomes more diverse, some individuals openly
express discomfort with living in integrated communities, advocating
instead for self-segregation or homogenous neighborhoods. This mindset
dangerously romanticizes a predominantly white America of the past,
ignoring the progress made through civil rights victories and the
inherent strength of a diverse nation. It panders to fear and division,
introducing a regressive worldview that threatens to unravel the social
fabric rather than strengthen it. The Minnesota fraud scandal involving Somali communities underscores the challenges posed by rapid demographic change. While the story sparked attention and fueled skepticism about immigrant communities, it also highlights the necessity of a balanced view. Diversity brings new opportunities but also requires vigilance to maintain law, order, and accountability. Yet exploiting such incidents as justification for rolling back civil rights protections and endorsing segregationist policies betrays a deeper political agenda aimed at consolidating power under the pretense of defending traditional values and neighborhoods. What’s more, the political narrative pushing for segregation-like policies is intertwined with a broader conservative strategy to reshape American society. By framing immigrants and minorities as political assets for one party, the argument shifts focus from individual rights to electoral calculus. The harsh reality is that this approach threatens to further polarize the nation, promoting division as a tool for political gain rather than fostering unity and mutual respect. True leadership should emphasize common American values and the benefits of integration rather than capitulating to fear-based separatism. Ultimately, the steps to erode integration policies represent a retreat from the vision of America as a melting pot of cultures and ideas. Rather than a return to the era of “separate but equal,” which was anything but equal, the nation must reaffirm its commitment to diversity and inclusion while addressing concerns constructively. The path forward lies not in separation but in encouraging understanding, cooperation, and shared identity—because an America divided will never be truly strong or free. |
Afghan Terrorist Caught with WMD Plans in Car Bomb Plot
 |
It looks like the Allies Welcome program has raised some eyebrows again, and not for the right reasons. A curious character named Mohammad Dawood Alokozay was in the headlines, and let’s just say it wasn’t because he won a baking contest at the state fair. He was planning to cook up something far more explosive and sinister, targeting Fort Worth, Texas. Turns out, this kind of news wasn’t quite what folks in Texas were expecting! But the surprises don’t end there, folks. We’ve
been told over and over about this so-called rigorous vetting process
and how we’re only getting the crème de la crème of international
talent. Yet here we have another embarrassing case that leaves us
questioning whether the only “rigor” involved was how rigorous a shrug
the vetters could muster. Importing individuals with questionable pasts?
Sounds like someone missed the memo. While the media stays mum, it’s hard not to imagine what the streets of our cities might look like if silent bystanders remain, well, silent. It’s like a neighborhood game of “Find the Airplane” where nobody wins if everyone keeps their complaints to themselves. Remember the old saying about good men doing nothing? It fits like a glove here. Picture this: a TikTok video filled with all sorts of suspicious chatter, and no one bats an eye. Where’s the community outrage? The apologies? A bit of public denouncement would be a nice touch—akin to reminding everyone that they’re all about the land of the free, home of the brave, not free-range chaos. Yet, it seems that moment of collective epiphany is lost in translation too. And there it is, the continuous pattern they, whoever “they” are, proclaim isn’t real but keeps showing up like an unwanted guest. As the old saying goes, fool us once, shame on them. Fool us twice, and it’s time to re-evaluate the guest list. Because let’s face it, if we don’t, we’re only preparing the punchline to a joke no one wants to hear anymore. |
Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Trump Terminates All Biden Autopen Actions
President Donald Trump on Tuesday followed through on a pledge he made last week, announcing that he has "completely terminated" every action signed by former President Joe Biden
using the autopen, declaring those measures null and void. "Any and all Documents, Proclamations, Executive Orders, Memorandums, or Contracts, signed by Order of the now infamous and unauthorized 'AUTOPEN,' within the Administration of Joseph R. Biden Jr., are hereby null, void, and of no further force or effect," Trump said in a post to Truth Social. "Anyone receiving 'Pardons,' 'Commutations,' or any other Legal Document so signed, please be advised that said Document has been fully and completely terminated, and is of no Legal effect," he added. Tuesday's post echoed Trump's remarks
from Friday, when he wrote that "any document signed by Sleepy Joe
Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby
canceling and of no further force or effect."
Trump has spent months arguing that Biden relied on the autopen for everything from executive orders to national-emergency extensions to routine certifications. He has said Biden used it so frequently that "staff were effectively running the government with a machine." Federal defense attorney Ronald Chapman II told Newsmax on Sunday that Trump has the authority to void executive actions taken under Biden's autopen if the device was used without Biden's approval. "So if anybody used the autopen without Joe Biden's express permission, without him deciding that a pardon is OK, it's going to be an invalid signature, and the force and effect of that signature makes it moot," Chapman said. Legal experts say autopen-signed presidential actions remain valid as long as the president authorized them, regardless of who physically operated the device. According to a 2005 memo from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), a president need not personally affix his signature: he may direct a subordinate — or a mechanical device such as an autopen — to sign on his behalf. With the president's authorization, the mode of signature is immaterial. But if a president truly had no knowledge of the device's use or did not consent to the signature, some scholars argue those actions could be challengeable. Biden aides previously have acknowledged he used the autopen for executive orders, ceremonial proclamations, condolence letters, holiday statements, and emergency-status renewals, especially when traveling or recovering from medical procedures. A GOP-led House Oversight Committee report questioned the legitimacy of numerous executive actions with an autopen, alleging they sometimes lacked clear proof of Biden's personal approval. The Committee urged the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate potential misuse of presidential authority. |
Smarter Than a College Freshman: Univ. of Alabama Student Redraws Senate Maps, Gets Federal Approval
 |
Daniel DiDonato is a University of Alabama student who recently turned 18. Alabama has its statewide elections in 2026, so as a potential voter, DiDonato now has skin in the game. But even before he did, DiDonato decided to make his voice heard. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, ruled in Alabama State Conference of the NAACP v. Allen that the state's maps, particularly in Senate districts 25 and 26, were in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In August, district court Judge Anna Manasco ordered the maps to be redrawn. Because of arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, in which Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall filed an amicus brief,
Gov. Kay Ivey declined to call a special legislative session in order
to redraw the maps. This left the task to Richard Allen, a special
master charged with overseeing the new maps, and the courts. DiDonato
decided he would not only redraw those maps, but he submitted them to
the U.S. District Court for use in the case.
DiDonato still had not reached the age of majority under Alabama law,
so he filed the maps under his initials. Much to his — and others' —
amazement, District Judge Manasco ordered the implementation of his
maps. If fully approved by Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen, the
plaintiffs, and the special master, these maps could be used in the 2026
primary elections in May.
DiDonato said in the NewsNation interview video below:
WATCH:
Some lessons here: It doesn't take a rocket scientist, a legislator, or a court, for that matter, to produce a map. Perhaps this should be the rule. Engaged citizens without an agenda are probably the best choice to know how maps should be drawn in order to achieve voter satisfaction and bipartisan ends. DiDonato said he did not use race as a factor in creating his model.
Despite the fact that DiDonato could not attend the hearings and the lack of commentary on what he submitted, Judge Mancuso chose his as the map to be used moving forward. How far forward remains in question. Special Master Allen, AL SOS Wes Allen, and the plaintiffs' attorneys are critical of the maps. Probably because a college student who stayed up until 3 a.m. and ate gummy worms for energy did the actual heavy lifting and didn't even ask for credit. Should the SCOTUS justices rule in favor of Louisiana and other states in Louisiana v. Callais, it would render this case moot, since the violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is the basis for these maps in the first place. As my RedState colleague streiff wrote:
Dive Deeper: Federal Judge Rules That Maps for Alabama's Largest County Must Be Redrawn Supreme Court to Decide Legality of Key Voting Rights Act Provision Finally, AL AG Marshall has joined with Texas in their redistricting case, which asserts that state legislators have the right under the law to draw their maps as they see fit. Marshall is also running for Sen. Tommy Tuberville's seat (R-AL), so his actions are also being viewed through a lens of whether he will be a fighter for Alabamians. Lawsuits, thirsty politicians, and an ingenious young person who says he wants to make a difference are making interesting bedfellows. Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people |
Trump Hints at a Bold, New World of Tax Freedom for Americans: ‘Get Rid of It’
 |
President Trump on Tuesday ignited excitement amongst taxpaying Americans by boldly predicting they could soon bid farewell to income taxes entirely. While incredibly ambitious, the president's plan would usher in a hitherto undreamt-of world of tax freedom for hardworking families. (Apologies, having just watched Avengers with my granddaughter, the Dr. Strange line "hitherto undreamt-of is fresh in my mind.) Can he do it, though? Trump sure thinks so. Speaking to reporters, the president teased the White House's aggressive exploration of alternative revenue streams, which already include tariffs and trade war resets with numerous countries. The result, perhaps? No income taxes for you. Trump told reporters the American people "at some point in the not too distant future ... won’t even have income tax to pay." "Whether you get rid of it or just keep it around for fun or have it really low, much lower than it is now, but you won't be paying income tax," he continued. READ MORE: An Economist's Take on Tariffs: They May Be Bad, but Income Taxes Are Worse Tim Walz Gets Skewered by Kristi Noem Over Visa Fraud, As MN Is About to Feel the Wrath of ICE Let's uh, let's not "keep it around for fun." Skeptics—and there will be many—will suggest this is an example of the President over-promising on something and setting voters up for disappointment. Joseph Lavorgna, an economist who serves as counselor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, does not appear to be in that camp. He recently wrote an op-ed insisting Trump "is making life affordable again for every American," citing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "From higher take-home pay for hardworking families to tax incentives that will drive a disinflationary boom, the One Big Beautiful Bill was engineered to Make America Affordable Again," Lavorgna writes. "This historic tax reform will ensure that Main Street prospers alongside Wall Street in President Trump’s Golden Age economy." Could President Trump deliver a Golden Age for our wallets or our personal bank accounts? Improving the conditions of both is an absolute must before the midterms. Bessent, meanwhile, spoke at the cabinet meeting, predicting increased tax refunds and wage growth in the coming months.
Trump's prediction of a world without income taxes for the American people is in line with previous comments and with the establishment of the "External Revenue Service," which he mentioned in his inaugural address. "Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens," he said at the address. "For this purpose, we are establishing the External Revenue Service to collect all tariffs, duties, and revenues. It will be massive amounts of money pouring into our Treasury, coming from foreign sources." "The American dream will soon be back and thriving like never before." A key goal of Trump’s fair-trade policies is to shift the U.S. tax base from one primarily reliant on income taxes to one that takes in revenue from other streams. Tariffs, though they have their detractors, are a primary source. "It's time for the United States to return to the system that made us richer and more powerful than ever before," he said back in January. "Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich foreign nations, we should be tariffing and taxing foreign nations to enrich our citizens." Fox News reports that his latest comments mark the most explicit endorsement yet of eliminating income taxes. "If enacted, abolishing income tax would mark the most ambitious overhaul of the American tax system in more than a century," they surmise. It takes an ambitious man to make such sweeping changes to the benefit of the American people. |
ICE Has Commenced the Great Somali Round-up in Minnesota
 |
We have reports that the great Somali round-up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement has begun. It’s been looming as the Trump administration has made it clear that mass deportations will remain a cornerstone of its immigration agenda. It must be—we have hordes of people who shouldn’t be here; imported by the Biden administration (via NYT):
The move comes as President Trump has fixated on Somalis living in the United States, using increasingly inflammatory language to attack them. He stepped up his rhetoric in the wake of last week’s shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, even though the man suspected in the attack is an Afghan national.
All I can say is happy hunting. Also, this state is awash with Somali illegals and gang activity. They’ve created massive Medicaid fraud schemes, which have enriched terrorists, so please spare me the fake news sob stories. I don’t care. Get them out of here. |
-
How many times do we need to say this? If you’re here illegally and get caught, you’re going back. It’s the la...
