Sunday, August 7, 2016

GOP congressman says he'll vote for Libertarian ticket over Trump

Idiot
Rep. Scott Rigell, R-Va. said Saturday that he would support Libertarian Gary Johnson for president over GOP nominee Donald Trump.
"I’ve always said I will not vote for Donald Trump and I will not vote for Hillary Clinton," Rigell told The New York Times.
Rigell is the third Republican House member this week to say he would not vote for the real estate mogul, who has caused an uproar on the campaign trail with a series of controversial comments.
On Tuesday, Rep. Richard Hanna, R-N.Y., wrote in an op-ed that he would vote for Clinton instead of Trump, whom Hanna called "offensive and narcissistic," as well as "a world-class panderer."
Both Hanna and Rigell are retiring from Congress following this election.
The day after Hanna's op-ed was published, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., told CNN that he would not back Trump amid an ongoing war of words between the GOP nominee and the Muslim family of a fallen American soldier.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
"Donald Trump for me is beginning to cross a lot of red lines in the unforgivable on politics," said Kinzinger. "He has crossed so many red lines that a Commander-in-Chief, or a candidate for Commander-in-Chief should never cross."
Kinzinger added that he would not vote for Clinton and was uncertain about whether to write in a candidate.

Rigell told the Times that he expected more GOP members of Congress and local officials to distance themselves from Trump as Election Day nears. He claimed that many Republican candidates have asked him for advice.
"When their own conscience is seared by some statement that Trump has made," Rigell said. "I have encouraged them to be direct and also, in a timely manner, repudiate what he said."
Rigell also vowed that he would leave the party and become an independent if Trump's campaign platform took hold in the party.

At GOP urging, Trump turns focus on Clinton emails, 'short circuit' explanation


Donald Trump this weekend pounced on Hillary Clinton’s email scandal and her continuing efforts to fully explain her culpability, amid Republicans and other supporters now repeatedly urging him to stick with his likely best winning strategy.
“The more the they talk about the emails the worse it gets,” David Morey, of the international strategy firm DMG Global, on Saturday told Fox News’ “America’s News Headquarters.”
Last weekend, Clinton told “Fox News Sunday” that FBI Director James Comey said that she was “truthful” to the American public about her use of a private email server while secretary of state -- a statement critics of the Democratic presidential nominee quickly disputed.
However, Trump, the GOP presidential nominee, didn’t appear to fully engage on the issue until Friday night, after Clinton, in a press conference, suggested she “short circuited” her remarks Sunday and was in fact saying Comey acknowledged her being truthful with the FBI during the agency’s investigation into the email issue.
At a rally Friday night in Wisconsin, after Clinton’s remarks earlier that day at a National Association of Black Journalists and National Association of Hispanic Journalists gathering, Trump called Clinton “unbalanced” and “unhinged.”
“She's a monster, look at what's happened, look at her history,” Trump said at a rally in Green Bay. “In another way, she's a weak person. She's actually not strong enough to be president."
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
Clinton continues to say there was no classified information in official emails either sent or received on the private server, despite Comey saying parts of three emails indeed included classified material.
On Saturday morning, Trump turned to Twitter, a favorite means for his largely unfiltered attacks.
“Crooked Hillary said loudly, and for the world to see, that she "SHORT CIRCUITED" when answering a question on her e-mails. Very dangerous!” he tweeted, then said in a follow-up tweet: "Anybody whose mind "SHORT CIRCUITS" is not fit to be our president! Look up the word "BRAINWASHED."
Trump and Clinton each have some of the lowest ratings on likeability and trustworthiness in the history of U.S. presidential elections.
Ian Prior, a spokesman for the conservative-leaning PAC American Crossroads, told Fox’s AEHQ that Trump should stick with four issues -- the economy, immigration, national security and Clinton and keep the candidate from “getting into fights.”
To be sure, Trump has perhaps had the worst week of the presidential election cycle -- after getting into an exchange with the Muslim lawyer and father of an Army captain killing in Iraq who attacked Trump at the Democratic National Convention.
Republican strategist Rob Carter said Trump focusing on Clinton "would be a huge benefit not only to the Trump campaign but to the Republican Party as a whole. Untrustworthy and unable to maintain national security, those are issues that Republicans will always care deeply about."
Trump, who dropped in several polls in his race with Clinton, also withheld his endorsement for House Speaker Paul Ryan who is seeking reelection, causing further distractions.
“I’m not quite there yet,” Trump said before endorsing the Ryan, R-Wisc., on Friday, using words similar to Ryan’s when he delayed endorsing Trump earlier this year.
Ryan said Thursday on WTAG radio in Wisconsin that Trump has had "a pretty strange run since the convention. You would think that we want to be focusing on Hillary Clinton, on all of her deficiencies. She is such a weak candidate that one would think that we would be on offense against Hillary Clinton, and it is distressing that that’s not what we’re talking about these days.”

Clinton renews vow to 'fast track' immigration; Trump camp accuses candidate of acting like a 'king'


Hillary Clinton announced perhaps her most ambitious plan yet for immigration reform Friday, including a vow to “end deportation” for millions of illegal immigrants in the United States if elected president. In turn, Republican nominee Donald Trump's campaign claimed Clinton intends to assume “king-like powers” that would harm Americans.
Clinton, speaking before a National Associations of Black and Hispanic Journalists gathering in Washington, said she intends to introduce legislation within the first 100 days of her potential administration that will add hundreds of billions of dollars to the economy.
The Democratic presidential nominee also urged potential voters to help Democrats retake the Senate in November, claiming assurances that they would “fast track her proposal.”
“This is a clear high priority for my administration,” she said. “We will be prepared to introduce legislation as quickly as we can …Trump plans to round up immigrants … We will not be deporting families.”
Clinton's comments suggested that she would follow President Obama’s example of taking executive action on immigration reform.
The Supreme Court in June split 4-4 on Obama’s 2014 plan to defer deportation for roughly 4.3 million parents of Americans and other lawful permanent residents.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
The ruling sent the case back to a lower court. But Clinton, like Trump, would attempt to appoint a justice for the high court’s ninth and open seat to help win favorable decisions on such issues.
“Hillary believes DAPA is squarely within the president’s authority and won’t stop fighting until we see it through,” states Clinton’s campaign website, which also says she intends to defend the president’s 2012 executive action to defer deportation for millions of people brought into the United States illegally by their parents.
The Clinton campaign did not immediatley respond Saturday to a request for comment.
Trump senior policy adviser Stephen Miller -- who as a staffer from Alabama GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions helped defeat a bipartisan Senate immigration reform bill -- issued a five-page statement on Friday attacking Clinton’s policies dating back to May 2015. The Senate bill died in the GOP-controlled House.
Clinton has vowed since essentially the start of her campaign to make immigration reform a first-100-day priority. And Trump, who has vowed to build a wall along the southern U.S. border to keep out illegal Mexican immigrants, has said Clinton’s plan is tantamount to amnesty for those in the U.S. illegally and that she would “totally open borders.”
Trump, in the wake of several deadly attacks inspired or directed by ISIS, called for a temporary ban on all Muslims into the U.S. The Republican presidential nominee has since suggested a ban only for Muslims coming from such Middle East terror hotspots as Syria.
Miller, whose has long argued that “amnesty” — legal working status for some of the country's estimate 11 million illegal immigrants — would take away jobs from unemployed Americans, argued on Friday that Clinton’s first-100-day pledge is also dangerous.
“Her pledge — in the middle of a national security and a border security crisis” — demonstrates her callous and cruel disregard for the safety of the American people,” Miller wrote.
“This administration has released hundreds of thousands of criminal illegal immigrants, and yet Clinton says she wants to go even further, ending virtually all deportations and ending all protections Americans have against open borders.”

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Iran Obama Cartoons





Iran video may show US cash payment


Was Trump right? Iran video may show US cash payment


Iran might have a video of America's $400 million cash payment to the regime after all -- even though Donald Trump backed off such claims early Friday amid intense criticism.
An apparent Iranian TV documentary in February about the prisoner swap in fact shows pallets of cash, which the narrator indicates is the $400 million payment in question. The video was posted to YouTube this week, after new controversy erupted over the payout.
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that the payment, made in cash, coincided with the release of four Americans, fueling charges that the U.S. paid Tehran a "ransom."
The narrator in the video, speaking in Farsi, describes the money as part of a "swap."
"In this exchange, the Iranians demand the entire four-hundred million in addition to $1.3 billion in deferred interest," the narrator says. “The morning of 17 January 2016, Mehrabad Airport. Four-hundred million dollars in cash is transported to Iran by airplane."
The video originates from the site “Ansarclip.ir” and is believed to be an Iranian documentary aired after the U.S. prisoner release. FoxNews.com cannot verify the authenticity of the footage or the claims made in it.
The administration has insisted the money was separate from the prisoner release, part of a $1.7 billion payment stemming from an unfulfilled arms deal -- a payment the administration announced in January.
But critics have called it ransom, and Trump told crowds Wednesday and Thursday there was video of the money being handed over -- and that the tapes were handed over by Iran to embarrass the U.S.
“The tape was made right, you saw that? With the airplane coming in -- nice plane -- and the airplane coming in and the money coming off I guess, right?” Trump told a crowd in Portland, Maine, on Thursday. “That was given to us, has to be, by the Iranians and you know why the tape was given to us? Because they want to embarrass our country, they want to embarrass our country.”
After criticism from Democrats and media outlets who branded the claim “false,” Trump backed away from the claims, saying he had seen a video of the prisoners being released, but not the money being handed to Iran.
“The plane I saw on television was the hostage plane in Geneva, Switzerland, not the plane carrying $400 million in cash going to Iran!” he tweeted Friday.

Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton: 'She needs lying lessons from her husband'



Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said Friday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” that Hillary Clinton has been trapped by her lies about her email investigation.
“The original sin, apart from the act itself, was the press conference she held at the U.N. when the story broke, which was fundamentally untrue at about 12 levels, Krauthammer said. “And she has never been able to admit that.”
Krauthammer said Clinton simply has no charisma – and thus, can’t move past the scandal.
 “What she needs are lying lessons from her husband, who was one of the great liars of all time, could do it with a smile and charm, and kind of, in a way that was sort of wizardly,” Krauthammer said. “She may still win the presidency, but will never be able to escape the original set of lies.”

Clinton tries to 'clarify' email comments – and adds to confusion


Hillary Clinton tried Friday to “clarify” her widely disputed claim that the FBI director had declared her statements on her email scandal “truthful” – but may have ended up adding to the confusion, delivering a lengthy and at-times conflicting explanation that the Donald Trump campaign later called “pretzel-like.”
The Democratic presidential candidate addressed the controversy when she fielded questions from reporters with the National Association of Black Journalists and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
She was asked early on about her statement, on “Fox News Sunday,” that FBI Director James Comey had affirmed her answers on her email controversy “were truthful and what I've said is consistent with what I have told the American people.”
Fact-checkers have roundly slammed that claim, noting that’s not exactly what Comey said.
Clinton, however, seemed to stand by her comments on Friday, saying she was referring to her answers in her FBI interview -- while also acknowledging she may have “short-circuited” her explanation.
In her clarification, though, Clinton gave a difficult-to-follow response.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
“I have said … that what I told the FBI, which he said was truthful, is consistent with what I have said publicly,” Clinton said.
She added: “Having him say that my answers to the FBI were truthful – and that I should quickly add what I said was consistent with what I had said publicly, and that’s really in my view trying to tie both ends together.”
This new explanation drew jeers from Republicans.
“Clinton knows the actions she has taken are disqualifying for someone wishing to become Commander-in-Chief, and that is why today’s painful, pretzel-like response to a simple question about her illegal server was obvious to everyone watching,” Jason Miller, Trump senior communications adviser, said in a statement.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said, “Judging from the way Hillary Clinton kept lying at today’s event, it’s not hard to see why she hasn’t held a press conference in 244 days.”
Priebus accused Clinton of “yet again falsely claiming that what Director Comey said at his press conference is consistent with what she told the American people.”
Comey did say last month the bureau had “no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI.”
However, the FBI director did not say the same about her statements to the American public.
And during testimony before a House committee, Comey said it was “not true” that nothing Clinton sent or received was marked classified. To the contrary, he said, “there was classified material emailed.”
After Clinton’s initial statement to “Fox News Sunday” – which she repeated later in the week – fact-checkers piled on. The Washington Post awarded her “four Pinnochios.” PolitiFact gave her a “Pants on Fire” rating. FactCheck.org declared her claims “false.”
On Friday, however, Clinton challenged the claims on the classified markings. As her campaign has argued before, she noted Comey has acknowledged the markings themselves were not properly marked. The State Department also has suggested those markings shouldn’t have been there, which Clinton mentioned Friday.
She repeated: “I never sent or received anything that was marked classified.”
Comey, though, also challenged other statements by Clinton during his testimony last month. On her claim that she used one device, Comey said, “She used multiple devices.”
Clinton offered conflicting statements on that point Friday.
At the top of her answer, she said that using two emails accounts was a “mistake.”
But at the end, she said: “I will go back to where I started. I regret using one account.”

Trump endorses Ryan, McCain and Ayotte after initial reluctance


Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump endorsed three top GOP officeholders — House Speaker Paul Ryan, Arizona Sen. John McCain and New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte — for re-election Friday night after declining to do so earlier this week.
Trump announced his endorsements at an event in Ryan's home state of Wisconsin four days before the Speaker faces challenger Paul Nehlen in a primary election.
Appearing to read from a prepared statement, Trump called Ryan "a good man" and "a good guy."
"We will have disagreements," Trump said. "But we will disagree as friends and never stop working together toward victory and real change."
"I need a Republican Senate and a House to accomplish all the changes we have to make," added Trump, who also said "my 80 percent friend is not my 20 percent enemy," a phrase often attributed to Ronald Reagan.
Nehlen issued a statement calling Trump's endorsement of Ryan "appropriate" and "a display of true leadership" as the Republican nominee. However, Nehlen also said that Trump's initial refusal to back Ryan "sent a clear signal to Wisconsin voters that Ryan is not his preferred candidate in this race" and claimed the Speaker had "undermined our nominee at every turn."
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
Trump initially refused to back Ryan in an interview with The Washington Post earlier this week.
“I like Paul. I like Paul. But these are horrible times for our country. We need very strong leadership. We need very, very strong leadership. And I’m just not quite there. I’m not quite there yet,” Trump said at the time.
Trump’s phrasing echoed statements Ryan had made in May, when the Speaker said of endorsing Trump, "I'm just not ready to do that at this point. I'm not there right now."
While giving Trump his support, Ryan has frequently been critical of some of the billionaire’s most controversial statements. On Thursday, he said that it was “distressing” that Trump hadn’t spent more time focusing on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
“He’s had a pretty strange run since the convention,” Ryan said on WTAQ radio in Green Bay. “You would think that we want to be focusing on Hillary Clinton, on all of her deficiencies. She is such a weak candidate that one would think that we would be on offense against Hillary Clinton, and it is distressing that that’s not what we’re talking about these days.”
Trump’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, had endorsed Ryan Thursday, and said he had been encouraged to do so by Trump.
Trump also said earlier this week that he had "never been a big fan of John McCain." The 79-year-old McCain, who Trump has disparaged in the past, faces two primary opponents later this month.
On Friday, however, Trump said he held McCain "in the highest esteem" and "I fully support and endorse his re-election."
Trump also endorsed Ayotte, calling the New Hampshire senator "a rising star." On Tuesday, Trump told the Post that Ayotte had given him "no support — zero support," later adding "We need loyal people in this country. We need fighters in this country. We don't need weak people."
A poll taken this week shows Ayotte trailing her Democratic opponent, New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan, by 10 points in the race for Ayotte's Senate seat.

Friday, August 5, 2016

A soldier and his dog were killed. Watch what baggage handlers do with their caskets.


Obama Release Prisoners Cartoons






Rep for federal prosecutors blasts Obama over mass commutations

Aug 3, 2016: President Barack Obama listens to a question during a Young African Leaders Initiative event at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington.
The head of the association representing career federal prosecutors unloaded Thursday on President Obama's decision to cut short the sentences of 214 prisoners, accusing the administration of violating its own clemency guidelines.
Obama's was the most commutations ever issued on a single day, according to political scientist P.S. Ruckman Jr., who tracks presidential commutations. His total now stands at 562, more than the previous nine presidents combined.
"These aren't little, nonviolent offenders."
Steve Cook, president of the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys, told LifeZette that 55 of the prisoners have firearms convictions -- in many cases not just possessing a weapon but using it help carry out drug distribution operations. Others have criminal backgrounds that should have raised red flags, he said.
"The reason some of this should shock people is when this clemency program was announced, the public was told in order to qualify, applicants had to meet six very specific criteria," he said, adding that even a cursory review suggests many should have failed that test.
Cook noted that two men who received a break were serving time for "engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise," which he said indicates they were drug kingpins.
A federal judge in New York State sentenced Dewayne L. Comer in 1997 to life in prison for leading a million-dollar drug ring from 1994 to 1996. According to syracuse.com, he was one of about two dozen people convicted of participating in a drug ring that sold crack cocaine in central New York. The judge ordered him to forfeit a Mercedes-Benz, a Ford minivan, a Volkswagen, and $17,600 in cash seized at the time of his arrest.
Since the conspiracy involved more than 1.5 kilograms of crack, his life prison term was mandatory at the time -- but would not be under more lenient sentencing guidelines that have since taken effect. He will get out of prison on Dec. 1, thanks to the president's commutation.
The other prisoner cited by Cook is Dawan "Swannie" Croskery, a Buffalo man sentenced in 2004 to 20 years in prison for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and money laundering. He will also be released from prison Dec. 1.
According to a Buffalo News article from the time he was sentenced, authorities arrested Croskery in October 2002, after a lengthy investigation by the FBI and the Public Safety Department of the Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority. He admitted to selling powder and crack cocaine and washing drug proceeds by purchasing cars in the names of other people.
Then there is Ralph Casas, whose life sentence Obama reduced to a little more than 24 years. Casas was convicted in connection with a drug conspiracy to smuggle -- as described by a federal appeals court -- "massive amounts cocaine and heroin from Puerto Rico and several foreign countries into Miami and New York."
Casas used his job as an American Airlines baggage handler at Miami International Airport to sneak the drugs past customs officials from September 1992 to March 1995. Cook noted that the cocaine quantity -- 9,445 kilograms -- is more than 10 tons.
"These aren't little, nonviolent offenders," Cook said.
Cook said those three cases may represent the tip of the iceberg, as a thorough analysis of the 214 names on the list has yet to be performed.
"That's without doing any digging at all," he said.
Another criterion set forth by the Obama administration in 2014 was that prisoners eligible for commuted sentences should not have extensive criminal records. But he said one prisoner who got a break in a previous round of clemency had eight felony drug convictions on his record.
"I don't know where in the country this would not be considered a significant criminal history," he said.
Cook said he is bracing himself for further commutations, as Obama has promised. He said he believes the White House will review some 30,000 cases.
"My theory is when they went in and looked [at the applications], there were not significant numbers of low-level, nonviolent offenders who didn't have significant criminal histories," he said. "I don't know how much worse it can get."

Battle of the Billionaires: Clinton’s uber-rich backers pour money into Trump fight


Donald Trump has his billions, but Hillary Clinton has her billionaires.
As the candidates formally enter the general election season after their conventions, the former secretary of state’s wealthiest backers are pouring money into political groups opposing Trump. Within the past year, according to a review by FoxNews.com, a total of 24 billionaires have donated more than $42.5 million to two Clinton campaign arms and three allied super PACs.
All this is in preparation for a blitz of advertising and other efforts to defeat Trump over the next three months – as some big-money Republicans stay on the sidelines.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise CEO Meg Whitman, for instance, is joining industrial power-brokers Charles and David Koch in refusing to back fellow Republican billionaire Trump. While the Koch brothers plan to stay out of the presidential race, Whitman is going one further by stating she will endorse and help fund Clinton.
Whitman will be in some influential company. Her most famous Clinton donor colleagues include movie producers Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, financiers Warren Buffett and George Soros, and Walmart heiress Alice Walton.
The billionaire donations were given to Clinton campaign funds Hillary for America and Hillary Victory Fund; and the pro-Clinton PACs American Bridge 21st Century, Priorities USA Action 2016 and Correct the Record.
The largest donor was Soros with $9 million, according to 2015 and 2016 Federal Election Commission records. This was followed up by mathematician and hedge fund manager James Simons at $7 million and Haim and Cheryl Saban, with $3.5 million each. Haim Saban owns the Spanish television network Univision.
Most of the money is donated to PACs because candidate campaigns are only allowed to accept $2,700 per donor. Clinton’s overall campaign total is $374.5 million and Trump’s is $98.7 million through July 21, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The Clinton campaign – which only recently put away a primary challenge from Bernie Sanders, who boasted of his small-dollar donations – stresses that the bulk of the nominee’s support is grass-roots.
"More than 900,000 people contributed to Hillary Clinton's campaign in July and the average donation is just $44,” Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin said. “That grass-roots support is the true power behind this campaign as Hillary lays out her plans to build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.”
But the high-dollar backing from some of the wealthiest Americans contrasts with some of the themes at last week’s Philadelphia convention. Clinton, who called in her convention address to get “money out of politics,” repeatedly has said her presidency would work for lower- and middle-class Americans while taxing the wealthiest, like Wall Street executives.
“I believe American corporations that have gotten so much from our country should be just as patriotic in return. Many of them are. But too many aren't,” Clinton said during her nomination acceptance speech. “It's wrong to take tax breaks with one hand and give out pink slips with the other. And I believe Wall Street can never, ever be allowed to wreck Main Street again.”
The super PACs, though, are a valued resource to push Clinton along in her quest to be the first female president.
American Bridge 21st Century was founded in 2010 to provide opposition research to the Democratic Party by following key Republicans and videotaping everything they say. The material is used to blanket airwaves and the Internet with their foibles. Its site is mostly dedicated to the presidential race.
Priorities USA Action 2016 was founded a year later with the purpose of raising funds from wealthy donors. Its website states “We’re all in for Hillary Clinton.” Correct the Record’s mission is to “defend Hillary Clinton against baseless attacks.”
Despite the looming ad onslaught, Trump’s campaign is voicing confidence about its financial position, after announcing an $80 million July fundraising haul for the campaign and the GOP. The haul marks a big fundraising surge, and comes close to the combined $90 million raked in by Clinton and the Democrats last month.
"The campaign is in good shape. We are organized. We are moving forward," campaign chairman Paul Manafort told Fox News' "Happening Now" on Wednesday. 
While Trump also is willing to keep spending from his own fortune to pad the account if necessary, Clinton enjoys a deep bench with deep pockets.
The other billionaires who donated to her cause are: heir to the Hyatt Hotel chain J.B. Pritzker and his wife Mary; Slim-Fast founder Daniel Abraham; film executive Thomas Tull; entrepreneur Marc Benioff; Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg; Jon and Pat Stryker, heirs to a self-named family medical device company; scientist David E. Shaw; philanthropist Barbara Lee; financiers John Doerr, Bernard Schwartz, Roger Altman, Henry Laufer and Herb Sandler; and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman.
Oprah Winfrey stated on television that she endorses Clinton, but she doesn’t have any donations listed on the FEC website.
But one high-profile backer has decided to fund his own anti-Trump endeavors.
Billionaire Tom Steyer spent $1.9 million through his environmental action organization NextGen to produce a television commercial titled “The Wall,” which ran in California during the Republican convention. In the commercial, Steyer and a group of young people stand in front of a montage of Trump clips where the candidate discusses building a wall at the border. “That’s not America,” Steyer states as the group says in chorus, “Vote!”
Earlier this year, Steyer told reporters he would spend $25 million in an effort to turn out youth voters. He historically has used the nonprofit NextGen as a political platform for Democratic candidates.

Report: Hillary Clinton would hike taxes by $1.3 trillion

Will small business owners suffer under Clinton's tax plan?
Hillary Clinton comes up $2.2 trillion short in paying for her policy agenda, despite hiking taxes by $1.3 trillion, according to a new analysis of the Democratic nominee’s campaign platform.
The American Action Forum, a center-right policy institute, released a report Thursday finding Clinton’s domestic agenda would “have a dramatic effect on the federal budget.”
Gordon Gray, American Action Forum’s director of fiscal policy, based the report on estimates of policy proposals from the Clinton campaign itself, as well as independent analyses from the Tax Policy Center and the Center for a Responsible Federal Budget.
Gray found Clinton’s policies for expanding government’s role in family leave and student loans would contribute significantly to the deficit, and in turn a growing national debt that stands at $19.358 trillion.
In fact, the amount of debt held by the public alone would reach $25.825 trillion in 2026 under Clinton’s plan. The amount of debt held by the public today is $13.968 trillion.

Obama denies US paid Iran to release hostages, says ISIS still a threat



President Obama on Thursday pushed back on claims that the United States paid $400 million for the release of four American hostages in Iran – defending the transaction as evidence that the controversial nuclear deal with Tehran acted as a catalyst for progress in other areas.

"This wasn’t some nefarious deal," he said during a press conference at the Pentagon. "We do not pay ransom for hostages."

Reports have surfaced in recent days that a $400 million pallet of cash was airlifted by the Obama administration to the Iranian government at the same time four Americans hostages were released.
Obama said the money sent to Iran wasn’t a secret and suggested the news had been recycled to drum up drama.
Earlier Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry flatly denied any connection between the cash — and an additional $1.3 billion interest payment — and the prisoner swap, which occurred in rapid succession.
The payment was part of a decades-old dispute over a failed military equipment deal dating to the 1970s, before the Islamic revolution in 1979, the Obama administration has said.
"The United States does not pay ransom and does not negotiate ransoms," Kerry told reporters during a press conference in Buenos Aires. "It is not our policy. This story is not a new story. This was announced by the president of the United States himself at the same time."
The Obama administration has said the payment was part of a deal under the then-U.S.-backed shah to buy $400 million worth of military equipment in 1970s. The equipment was never delivered because in 1979, the government was overthrown and revolutionaries took Americans hostages at the U.S. embassy in Tehran.
The U.S. and Iran have been negotiating the Iranian claim to the money since 1981.
Some Republicans have slammed the payment as “ransom” and says it puts more Americans at risk of being taken hostage.
"The Obama Administration’s airlift of $400 million in cash to Iran is disturbing, but hardly surprising given its long record of concessions to America’s adversaries," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said in a written statement. "Whatever the Administration may claim, it is clear that this payment was a ransom for Americas held hostage in Iran."
House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said the cash payment marked "another chapter" in the Obama administration’s "ongoing saga of misleading the American people to sell this dangerous nuclear deal."
During the press conference, Obama also gave an update on the Islamic State terror group, saying it continues to pose a serious threat to Americans.
Despite the warning, he vowed to take them down and said the group will "inevitably be defeated."
"None of the (ISIS) leaders are safe, and we’re going to keep going after them," Obama said.
"We will expose them for what they are – murderers," he added.
The president also questioned Russia’s involvement in Syria, saying the relationship raises "very serious questions."
On the domestic front, Obama called Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s claims that the U.S. election will be rigged "ridiculous."
"Of course the election is not rigged – what does that even mean?" he said in response to a reporter’s question.
"This will be an election unlike any other election," he added. "I think all of us at some point in our lives played sports or in a schoolyard – some folks, if they lose, they say they got cheated but I’ve never heard of someone that hasn’t lost yet saying they got cheated."
His advice for Trump?
"My suggestion would be to go out and try to win the election."
Both Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton will soon receive classified briefings, giving them access to sensitive information about national security threats and the U.S. military posture. Asked whether he was worried about Trump having access to such material, Obama said simply that those who want to be president need to start acting like it.
"That means being able to receive these briefings and not spread them around," he said.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Millions to Iran Cartoons


Justice Department officials reportedly objected to timing of Iran cash payment


Senior Justice Department officials raised objections to the U.S. flying the equivalent of $400 million in cash to Iran around the time four detained Americans were released this past January, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.
On Tuesday, the paper reported that the money was flown to Iran in an unmarked cargo plane as the first installment in a $1.7 billion settlement of a failed 1979 arms deal.
According to the Journal, Justice Department officials raised concerns that the timing of the transfer would make it appear to be a ransom payment for the detainees. The officials did not object to the settlement itself.
"People knew what it was going to look like, and there was concern the Iranians probably did consider it a ransom payment," a person familiar with the discussions told the Journal.
The Journal also reported that Justice Department officials expressed concerns about both the number of Iranian prisoners freed by the U.S. and the number of sanctions violations cases that would be dropped as part of the two agreements. The report said most of their objections were overruled by the State Department.
A Justice Department spokesperson said Wednesday that the agency would not comment on "internal interagency deliberations." The statement added that the Justice Department "fully supported the ultimate outcome of the Administration’s resolution of several issues with Iran," including the arms deal settlement and the detainees' release.
The State Department has previously denied the cash transfer was connected to the release of the hostages. Late Wednesday, a senior State Department official told Fox News, "This was fully an interagency decision, and that any notion that the State Department had the power to simply overrule is false."
Earlier Wednesday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said it was "not accurate" to describe the payment as ransom.
"No, it was not," Earnest said. "It is against the policy of the United States to pay ransom for hostages."
Late Wednesday, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command denied the Defense Department had any role in transferring the money to Iran.

Trump sees fundraising surge, amid scramble to close ground game gap


With the political conventions behind them, Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee are scrambling to close their ground game gap with Hillary Clinton – boosting fundraising and concentrating on vital battlegrounds, even as some sources suggest they have a long way to go.
The campaign notoriously has lagged Clinton's in organizational strength, but faces the unavoidable reality that a ticket to the White House requires victory in key swing states like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and North Carolina.
In a sign they're taking the task seriously, the campaign on Wednesday announced $80 million in donations for the campaign and the GOP in July, money that can be used to target their message at these voters. The haul marks a big fundraising surge for the GOP nominee, and comes close to the combined $90 million raked in by Clinton and the Democrats last month.
"The campaign is in good shape. We are organized. We are moving forward," campaign manager Paul Manafort told Fox News' "Happening Now" on Wednesday, saying they've now hired 50 state directors.
The fundraising comes despite a rocky post-convention period for Trump that has included dealing with backlash over the candidate’s feud with Muslim parents whose son was killed in Iraq.
Sources say behind-the-scenes, though, concerns continue to surface that Trump’s ground game isn’t yet strong enough to compete with the Clinton machine.
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
“It hasn’t been the smoothest ride,” one source with knowledge of Trump’s field operations in the South told FoxNews.com.
Another described the operation as “all over the place.”
But Karen Giorno, a senior Trump adviser and Florida chief strategist, maintains the campaign has a plan in play that includes a coordinated multi-state Trump-RNC push that will challenge Democrats in key states.
She vowed a visible acceleration in the battlegrounds but added it’s “not a one-size-fits-all” plan.
“This is a non-traditional campaign in a non-traditional year,” she told FoxNews.com. “As you look at Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio – each effort is different.”
Florida, which has 29 electoral votes up for grabs, has emerged in the past two decades as one of the most important battleground states in the country. Giorno said Team Trump has “amassed a large army of volunteers and supporters” in Florida, boasting it’s “a well-oiled machine” that is growing.
Soon, she’ll put another 10 people on the payroll – mostly in leadership positions.
Both the Trump and Clinton campaigns are working with their respective national committees -- where Democrats likewise have a staffing edge in some places.
In Florida alone, Democrats maintain a paid team more than twice the size of the Republicans'. The goal of the Clinton camp is to have 100 operational field offices in the Sunshine State.
Last month, it set up shop in Miami.
“Miami — and South Florida in general — are going to be a large part of our strategy for success,” Simone Ward, Clinton’s Florida director, told The Miami Herald. “It is a major [get out the vote] universe for any presidential campaign, and in particular ours.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have a field staff of more than 100 while Republicans have 54. In Ohio, Democrats have 70 on staff as of June 11; Republicans have 53.
“Ninety-plus days before a totally winnable election and I’m stunned,” Gary Nordlinger, president of a political consulting firm and adjunct professor at George Washington University’s school of political management, told FoxNews.com, regarding the on-the-ground organizing. “I’m just shocked that Republicans did not learn from their mistakes in 2012.”
Despite campaign promises going into the Republican National Convention in Cleveland to step up their operations this month, staffing on the ground may still be spotty. FoxNews.com called Trump headquarters in Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and North Carolina -- but only in Florida's office in Sarasota did a person answer the phone.
Calls on Aug. 1 -- and again 24 hours later -- to the other three offices either were not answered or not returned when voicemail messages could be left.
An 11:06 a.m. ET call on Aug. 1 to the Pennsylvania branch led to this message: “The person you’ve called has a voicemail box that has not been set up yet.”
To Giorno, the comparisons of staffing numbers are not the best way to size up the rival teams.
“[Clinton’s] playbook is so last century,” she said. “We’re lean and mean and we get to adjust … they have this clunky, old school apparatus.”
Despite the data, Nordlinger says the New York businessman isn’t to blame.
“I’m not laying this at Trump’s feet,” he said. “[The RNC] has had four years to prepare for this.”
But the RNC, too, pushes back on any suggestion their ground game is lacking.
“The RNC has built the most efficient and effective ground game in the party’s history,” RNC spokeswoman Lindsay Walters told FoxNews.com. “We are focused on the entire ticket, working to get all Republicans on the ballot elected to office.”
Walters said the RNC has had staff on the ground in key states since 2011. Currently, there are 489 paid staffers, 4,100 trained organizers and thousands of volunteers in the field.
“In total, we have over 775 total staff dedicated to beating Hillary Clinton,” Walters said. “No other campaign, committee, or organization has been doing this for as long as we have. We are the infrastructure for the entire GOP ticket. And the Trump campaign has embraced that.”

Media trumpeting Trump implosion, but is it real?


This is what a full-fledged feeding frenzy looks like.
With Donald Trump facing the roughest stretch of his candidacy, the media have moved from questioning his sanity to depicting a campaign in disarray and top Republicans still wondering whether they can dump the nominee.
That won’t happen, of course, but it’s an indication of the toxic nature of the coverage and the flood of anti-Trump leaks now washing across the media landscape.
There’s a natural piling-on effect when campaigns go off the rails: The polls dip, the critics step up their rhetoric, staffers start pointing fingers, and the press keeps the vicious cycle going.
But I’ve never seen anything like this.
Things reached the point yesterday morning that CNBC’s John Harwood tweeted: “Longtime ally of Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager: 'Manafort not challenging Trump anymore. Mailing it in. Staff suicidal.'"
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
And there was this from CNN: “A source tells @DanaBashCNN that some Trump campaign staff are frustrated w/ candidate lately, ‘feel like they are wasting their time.’"
I am told by knowledgeable campaign sources that Manafort is not going anywhere and believes that Trump will be getting back on message.
I am further told that reports of a planned “intervention” with the candidate, led by Newt Gingrich and Rudy Giuliani, are false.
And the sources also say that, contrary to media reports, party chairman Reince Priebus is not furious with Trump, though he is disappointed with the nominee’s refusal to endorse Paul Ryan.
Trump and the House speaker appear to have an increasingly tenuous relationship. Trump is also refusing to back John McCain, one of several Republicans who ripped him for his handling of the Khizr Khan controversy.
Manafort told Fox’s Jon Scott that the campaign is “in good shape.”
Asked about reports that outside allies were plotting an “intervention” with the candidate, Manafort said: "This is the first I'm hearing about it," adding that some in the media are “saying untrue things.

Much of this grows out the Khan debacle, which the media seized upon after his Democratic convention speech about his son’s death in Iraq but which Trump then fueled by criticizing a Gold Star family.
That, in turn, revived fears among Republicans that Trump is too busy picking fights with everyone who insults him to run a disciplined campaign. I’m told there is frustration within his campaign that he keeps diverting to side issues, often in response to cable news chatter, rather than staying focused on attacking Hillary Clinton.
Even Gingrich, a close adviser and VP finalist, is criticizing his friend (while also lambasting media bias). “He has not made the transition to being the potential president of the United States, which is a much tougher league,” Gingrich told Maria Bartiromo. He added that “some of what Trump has done is just very self-destructive.”
Along comes ABC’s Jonathan Karl, reporting that “senior party officials are so frustrated — and confused — by Donald Trump’s erratic behavior that they are exploring how to replace him on the ballot if he drops out.”
Good luck with that.
MSNBC ran headlines all day about the Trump "intervention," but there were no signs it would materialize.
All of this has mushroomed into a tsunami of negative media coverage, with very little scrutiny of Clinton, at least right now.
Trump has been at war with the press from the day he got in the race, even as he drew enormous amounts of ink and airtime. But he can't expand his base simply by bashing the media, as satisfying as that may be.
The pundits, especially the ones on the left and right who detest him, are enjoying this latest chance to write him off.
But that has proven dangerous in the past. And campaign narratives, even the most relentlessly negative, have a way of changing at a moment's notice.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.

Fox News Poll: Voters trust Trump on economy, Clinton on nukes


Voters say the top issues facing the country are the economy and terrorism. They think Donald Trump will handle one of them better than Hillary Clinton, while the candidates tie on the other.
A new Fox News Poll on the 2016 election finds more voters trust Trump than Clinton on the economy (+5 points). He also bests Clinton on handling the federal deficit (+5 points). Those are the only issues where he comes out on top.
It’s a draw on “terrorism and national security,” as the candidates receive 47 percent apiece. In May, Trump led Clinton by 12 points on doing a better job on “terrorism” (52-40 percent).
Equal numbers of voters say the economy and terrorism are the most important issues facing the country today (22 percent each). Education is the only other one to receive double-digit mentions (11 percent). Here’s the rest of the list: race relations (9 percent), the federal deficit (5 percent), health care (5 percent), climate change (4 percent), immigration (3 percent), foreign policy (3 percent), and drug addiction (2 percent).
Clinton beats Trump by wide margins on education (+23 points), and on the lower priority concerns: climate change (+31 points), race relations (+28 points), drug addiction (+19 points), foreign policy (+16 points), and health care (+11 points). She also has the advantage on one of Trump’s signature issues -- immigration (+7 points).
Who would do better picking the next Supreme Court justice? That’s a hot topic this election. Voters trust Clinton over Trump by eight points. They also think she’s more likely to “preserve and protect the U.S. Constitution” (+7 points).
The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →
CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL POLL RESULTS
By a 22-point margin, voters trust Clinton over Trump when it comes to using nuclear weapons (56-34 percent). That’s twice the advantage she held in May (49-38 percent).

Yet voters are more likely to trust Trump to destroy terrorist groups like ISIS (+9 points).
The candidates now tie on restoring trust in government (43-43). That’s a shift since May when Trump had an eight-point advantage (46-38 percent).
Despite Trump’s claim that he understands the concerns of everyday Americans, Clinton bests him on empathy. By a 51-40 percent margin, voters say she’ll do a better job looking out for their family during tough economic times. In June 2012, Barack Obama topped Mitt Romney on this measure by 47-36 percent.
Poll-pourri
How do voters feel about Trump’s praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin? Fifty-two percent of voters say it’s no big deal. For 44 percent, it’s bothersome.
Most Republicans say it’s no big deal (72 percent), while two-thirds of Democrats say it bothers them (66 percent).
The Fox News poll is based on landline and cellphone interviews with 1,022 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from July 31-August 2, 2016. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points for all registered voters.

CartoonDems