A state legislator accused of using fake names to attack supporters of fracking says he's sorry.
An investigation by Pittsburgh TV station KDKA concluded that
Pennsylvania Democratic Representative Jesse White used several
different names to post harsh comments about supporters of natural gas
drilling.
The comments targeted two specific supporters -- calling them "trolls," "moles", and "dumber than a box of rocks."
The posts even identified one opponent's farm and encouraged people to boycott his products.
The website where the posts were made traced all the names back to White's legislative e-mail address.
Yesterday, White posted a statement on his Facebook page apologizing for what he calls an error in judgment.
Bailey Comment: It seems to me a Democrat that gets caught doing or saying something wrong can not be held accountable for it as long as they say I'm sorry.
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/special-report-bret-baier/2013/05/31/grapevine-legislator-uses-fake-names-attack-constituents
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Judge orders Google to turn over customer data to FBI
Demo. Barbara Boxer is best Buds with this Judge, and she was nominated by Pres. Bill Clinton for the position. Does this clarify why she would rule this way?
Judge orders Google to turn over customer data to FBI
Published June 01, 2013
Associated Press
FBI counter-terrorism agents began issuing the secret letters, which don't require a judge's approval, after Congress passed the USA Patriot Act in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The letters are used to collect unlimited kinds of sensitive, private information, such as financial and phone records and have prompted complaints of government privacy violations in the name of national security. Many of Google's services, including its dominant search engine and the popular Gmail application, have become daily habits for millions of people.
In a ruling written May 20 and obtained Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston ordered Google to comply with the FBI's demands.
But she put her ruling on hold until the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could decide the matter. Until then, the Mountain View, Calif.-based company must comply with the letters unless it shows the FBI didn't follow proper procedures in making its demands for customer data in the 19 letters Google is challenging, she said.
After receiving sworn statements from two top-ranking FBI officials, Illston said she was satisfied that 17 of the 19 letters were issued properly. She wanted more information on two other letters.
It was unclear from the judge's ruling what type of information the government sought to obtain with the letters. It was also unclear who the government was targeting.
The decision from the San Francisco-based Illston comes several months after she ruled in a separate case brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation over the letters. She ruled in March that the FBI's demand that recipients refrain from telling anyone — including customers — that they had received the letters was a violation of free speech rights.
Kurt Opsah, an attorney with the foundation, said it could be many more months before the appeals court rules on the constitutionality of the letters in the Google case.
"We are disappointed that the same judge who declared these letters unconstitutional is now requiring compliance with them," Opsah said on Friday.
Illston's May 20 order omits any mention of Google or that the proceedings have been closed to the public. But the judge said "the petitioner" was involved in a similar case filed on April 22 in New York federal court.
Public records show that on that same day, the federal government filed a "petition to enforce National Security Letter" against Google after the company declined to cooperate with government demands.
Google can still appeal Illston's decision. The company declined comment Friday.
In 2007, the Justice Department's inspector general found widespread violations in the FBI's use of the letters, including demands without proper authorization and information obtained in non-emergency circumstances. The FBI has tightened oversight of the system.
The FBI made 16,511 national security letter requests for information regarding 7,201 people in 2011, the latest data available.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/01/judge-orders-google-to-give-customer-data-to-fbi/?test=latestnews#ixzz2UyFI0Qbe
ObamaCare criticism is not about race, it’s about facts
"I have talked to so many members both in the House and the Senate, and you know what? You ready? You ready? What it comes down to? It's not about how many federal dollars we can receive, it's not about that. You ready? It's about race," Peterson said. "I know nobody wants to talk about that. It's about the race of this African-American president.”
Personally, I am outraged by Peterson’s comments – and I’m sure many opponents of the health care overhaul are as well. I am an American through and through. My roots are of Latino heritage – which I happen to be very proud of – and I will not tolerate being called a racist. I have cared for and treated minority patients throughout my career as a doctor.
My criticisms of ObamaCare are based on facts. It is a poorly executed plan, the American public was not informed and the agenda that was implemented behind the passing of this legislation is not one that I agree with. That is why I criticize ObamaCare.
If race is the best argument that a Democratic leader can come up with to explain why so many people are opposed to this new law, then they’ve got a lot of work to do.
My home is a rainbow of colors. My children have been raised in a multicultural environment and I am very proud of how we have raised them to form opinions based on fact – not emotion.
Peterson did release a statement on Thursday afternoon that was intended to clarify her remarks. However, she also seemed to defend them.
"I think we should judge a policy by its content, not the person proposing it," her statement said. "To be clear, I didn't call any person 'racist.' Rather, I was simply relaying the truth about conversations I've had with my colleagues and the factors they considered on the expansion of Medicaid. While others are using this as an opportunity to take my comments out of context in order to distract from the true issue, I think it's critical that we focus on the substance of the policy because it's the right thing to do for Louisiana."
But making a statement after the fact is easy. I don’t want an apology from State Sen. Peterson, what I want is for her to look the American public in the eye and explain her remarks.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/05/31/dr-manny-obamacare-criticism-is-not-about-race-its-about-facts/?test=latestnews#ixzz2Uxwe02Li
Friday, May 31, 2013
Obama Surrounds Himself With The Most Extreme Appointees In American History
Much has been written about Obama’s controversial appointments, not
only to the federal bench, but to key cabinet positions, as well as to
the unaccountable (and probably unconstitutional) “Czar” positions. Much
of the criticism has dwelled on the Obama administration’s lack of
vetting when filling these rolls—but that’s not the issue.
To the contrary, the Obama team did investigate thoroughly and they choose precisely. When an administration repeatedly nominates hard-left individuals, it’s not a vetting error—it’s a pattern. We should not allow the media to portray these appointments as a series of errors; but rather, we need to realize that Team Obama is simply nominating those who share their goal of radically changing America.
Most Americans have a hard time understanding this because they refuse to believe Obama is this extreme. But he is. For a year prior to his election conservatives warned voters that everything we knew about Obama indicated that his views were far from the mainstream. This was obvious when one analyzed his friends, which groups he funded while a “community activist,” his Illinois State Senate record, his United States Senate record and even what he wrote in his own books.
The reality, of course, is that Obama’s views are far from the mainstream and it is embarrassing so many Americans fell for his leftist candy-coated lies. Indeed, it appears that Obama is the most far left President in American history. His appointees only confirm this. These appointees hail from the crowd who regard their pedigree as the 60’s activists who cheered on the Vietcong, while American boys were slaughtered in the jungles of Vietnam. They hate America, or more precisely, they hate America’s heritage; American institutions, and the American Constitution.
Many of these extremists nominated by Obama hail from academia, where they were shielded from outside scrutiny while they quietly indoctrinated our youth. But don’t let the cloak of academia fool you; they are out to change America in ways most Americans oppose. More importantly, Americans need to realize their views are Obama’s views.
The American media is partly responsible for bringing such extremists to power. There is little doubt the media engaged in a massive propaganda effort to convince Americans that Obama was some kind of hip moderate; a breath of fresh air, a reformer, and someone who would fight the corrupt ways of Washington. Until Americans wake up and stop relying on the mainstream media for their source of news, they will continue to pay a heavy price for their ignorance. Unfortunately, this report covers just a few of Obama’s policy-makers, but there are many more such extremists within his administration.
Domestic Policy:
The Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein
Sunstein was nominated and approved to be Obama’s “Regulatory Czar.” He supports massive gun control and doesn’t believe the 2nd Amendment is an individual right. He has straight out said, “We ought to ban hunting.” While this fruitcake strips Americans of their Constitutional right to own guns, he wants to give rights to animals and has argued that “Animals should be permitted to bring suit…” Naturally, he also supports the “Fairness Doctrine,” the wrongly-named concept which allows the government to regulate the airwaves.
Stern, a veteran of the Clinton administration, was the U.S.
negotiator at the Kyoto conference in 1997 (which called for dramatic
climate change regulations based on bogus assumptions.) Had the treaty
been implemented, it would have plunged the world into economic chaos.
Since then, new evidence has revealed that the major climate models used to justify the Global Warming alarm was, in fact, not accurate. One would think Stern would address this, but chances are he won’t. Climate change seems to be more about giving the government control over our lives, than about phony climate crises. Indeed, Stern has made it clear that he thinks international agencies, such as the United Nations, should take the lead on forcing climate change down the throats of national governments. Stern has even gone as far as to propose that world powers form an “E8” group, who would meet yearly and dictate environmental policy to the rest of the world. What about national sovereignty? Clearly, Stern feels that’s an outdated concept.
Stern is also the nutcase behind the Cap and Trade proposal which, even an analysis by Obama’s own Treasury Department concluded, would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion dollars—just what we need for today’s economy!
Like most of Obama’s appointees, Holder is a member of the American
Constitution Society, a ACLU-type group dedicated to destroying much the
Constitution in order to make it “relevant” to the modern world. And as
with many Obama’s appointees, he is obsessed with race, even to the
point of refusing to pursue the prosecution of two Black Panther thugs
who intimidated white voters at a polling place. The thugs were
screaming things at the voters such as, “You are about to be ruled by
the black man, cracker.” If whites had harassing blacks at a polling
place, they would still be sitting in a jail within days. Nevertheless,
Holder apparently doesn’t mind undermining the democratic process.
He is currently challenging the rights of states to enact citizen
verification procedures previously approved by two federal courts. In
other words, Holder wants to make it easier for illegal aliens to vote,
which also happens to be ACORN’s goal. This comes as no surprise; Holder
has been undermining the rule of law for most of his career. While
serving as the #2 official in Clinton’s Justice Department, Holder was
the driving force behind the effort to pardon members of the notorious
Puerto Rican terrorist group, FALN, a group that engaged in over 130
attacks in the USA, killing six people. By refusing to carry out justice
against the Black Panthers and the Hispanic FALN terrorists, he was
clearly pandering to these two racial groups for political reasons. So
this is what Obama’s Justice Department will be all about: racial
pandering first and justice last. Speaking at an ACS convention last
November, Holder announced that America would soon be “run by
progressives.” At least he’s honest.
Deputy Attorney General – David OgdenThis
appointment must have been a favor for the porn industry; Ogden has
probably done more than anyone in America to defend the “rights” of
pornographers. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said Ogden “is more than
just a lawyer who has had a few unsavory clients. He has devoted a
substantial part of his career, case after case, for 20 years, in
defense of pornography.” For example, he argued in support of the
American Library Association when they went to court to challenge
mandatory anti-obscenity internet filters in school libraries.
Incredibly, the ALA/Ogden position was that libraries should be
free-speech zones in which school children should have the right to
access anything they want – even pornography – on school computers.
This comes as no surprise, when Ogden was an attorney for the
American Civil Liberties Union, he argued on constitutional grounds to
strike down the conviction of a defendant who received and possessed
child pornography. Ogden believes there is a constitutional right to
possess child pornography. The appointment of Ogden is apparently what
Obama means when he talks about promoting “family values.”
Solicitor General – Elena Kagan
Elena Kagan has also been mentioned by the Obama forces as the next
nomination to the Supreme Court. This is ironic considering her complete
lack of judicial or appellate experience. She has never even been a
judge or argued before the Supreme Court! Kagen has served as the Dean
of Harvard Law School, but her job was to fundraise and make the
students “comfortable.” As the Boston Globe writes, “Some of
her initial acts as dean were small-scale improvements, like offering
free coffee in classroom buildings and free tampons in women’s
bathrooms.” Isn’t that nice!
However, the few legal views she holds are certainly far from the
mainstream. She described the “don’t ask, don’t tell” homosexual
military policy adopted by President Clinton as “a profound wrong – a
moral injustice of the first order,” and favors homosexuals being
allowed to openly serve in the military. She argued that it was
unconstitutional for Congress to withhold funds from colleges that
banned military recruiters and she even took it upon herself to ban
military recruiters from Harvard because of their policy regarding
homosexuals. Clearly, her lesbianism has clearly created a bias that
affects her shallow legal views. Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel – Dawn Johnson
Johnson is the former legal director for the National Abortion
Rights Action League, a group on the extreme left of the abortion
debate. They oppose any restrictions on abortion for any reason, at any
time of pregnancy—even late term abortions. She has also worked for the
ACLU. Johnson has argued that abortion is all about “sexual freedom.”
That’s right: have sex with whoever you want and whenever you want and
if you get pregnant, get an abortion. This same mentality has led to
skyrocketing sexual disease rates, unwanted pregnancies, and untold
sorrow. In a brief filed while working with NARAL,Johnson cited a
source that said forcing women to bear children was “disturbingly
suggestive of involuntary servitude, prohibited by the 13th Amendment,
in that forced pregnancy requires a woman to provide continuous physical
service to the fetus in order to further the state’s asserted
interest.” In other words, being pregnant is comparable to being a
slave.
Secretary, Department of Education – Arne Duncan
Obama appointed Duncan due to his alleged success as CEO of Chicago’s public schools. However, in 2007, only 10% of black 4thgraders in Chicago reached the proficiency level in reading and for black 8th graders, only 9% reached reading proficiency. In math, only 8% of black students reached proficiency in 4th grade and just 6% reached proficiency in 8th
grade. This was the disappointing outcome, despite spending
$13-$14,000 per student and is among the highest of any major city.Even
worse, a majority of Chicago public school students drop out or fail to
graduate with their class. Needless to say, the Duncan era was a
disaster. He did, however, pursue an aggressive agenda to promote the
homosexual lifestyle in the schools. So Chicago kids can’t read or
write, but they all know how to engage in homosexual sex. If anyone
tells you Duncan is an “education reformer,” tell them you’re the tooth
fairy.
Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education – Kevin Jennings
The reality is that homosexuality is not safe; it takes years off
the average lifespan of males. But for Obama, is not really about
safety; it’s about keeping the homosexual community happy—after all,
they helped elect him. Jennings has been in the press lately due to
revelations that he gave encouraging advice to a boy who privately
confessed to him he was having sex with an older man. And what was
Jennings’s advice? Buy a condom. Parents, start monitoring what your
schools are teaching your children. It’s going to get ugly. Foreign Policy
United States Ambassador to United Nations – Susan Rice
Even though she served on the National Security Council under
President Clinton, Rice seems to have slept through the last two
decades. She is fanatically pro-UN and wants the United States to work
closely with the United Nations in order to
carry out all kinds of humanitarian and military actions, seeming
unaware that the UN has never been supportive of US interests. They
don’t stop wars; they don’t sanction terrorist regimes, and their
internal corruption is so pervasive they can’t even carry out
humanitarian missions. But rather than hold the UN responsible for its
obvious failings over the years, Rice blamed Bush for being “unilateral”
and for “stiff-arming our partners.” She even sits on the board of the
UN Fund for UNICEF, an agency which has been repeatedly caught giving
aid to terrorists, and during the Cold War, assisting communist
insurgents.
More seriously, she is overly cautious in regard to fighting terrorism. The former Ambassador to Sudan implicated Rice as the person who bungled the opportunity to take out Osama bin Laden when Sudanese officials offered him to the USA on a silver platter during the Clinton years.
She rejected their offer. There’s a good chance 9/11 could have been avoided if Rice had accepted the Sudanese offer. Apparently, even though she worked for the NSC, she didn’t regard Al-Qaeda as a threat. No wonder we were hit on 9/11. And now she’s our UN Ambassador? I wonder whose interests she will serve…probably the UNs.
National Security Council – Samantha Power
Power is an anti-Israel pseudo intellectual, a strange position
given that Israel is our top ally in the Middle East. She holds the view
that until Israel allows Palestine to set up a separate state, all the
other problems in the Middle East will remain. This, of course, ignores
the 1,300 year old war of conquest waged by Islam against the West, most
of it occurring long before the modern day Israel/Palestine conflict.
She also holds to the conspiratorial view that everything America does
in the Middle East – like the Iraq war – is due to Israeli
influence.Finally, she pooh-poohs the idea that Iran is developing
nuclear weapons, a thoroughly discredited view in light of recent
events. While she opposed sending troops to Iraq – she called it an
“occupation”—she favored sending US troops to Israel to forcibly impose a
Palestinian state. Power’s writing grossly exaggerates “war crimes”
committed by Israel and never condemns terrorist activity by the
Palestinians. The last thing we need in the midst of war between the
West and Islamic terrorism is a nut on the NSC giving the President
advice favoring our enemies.
Advisor, Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy – Rosa BrooksThis
genius wrote that Al-Qaeda was just an “obscure group” until America
began the war on terrorism, ignoring all the documentation that Al-Qaeda
was making plans for rapid growth long before 9/11. Apparently, it’s
America’s fault that terrorist groups exist today! She called President
Bush “our torturer in chief” and compared Bush’s anti-terrorist policies
to Hitler’s policies. Clearly, she ignored the fact that Bush’s
policies were responsible for stopping over 17 different terrorist plots
against the United States. She also called the successful surge in Iraq
a “feckless plan” and seems completely blind to the successes we have
had in the war on terrorism. But we shouldn’t be surprised; she used to
work for a foundation funded by the foreign America-hater George Soros.
It’s hard to believe Brooks is now deciding defense policy.
White House Staff
Senior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs – Valerie Jarrett Jarrett is involved with vetting all the extremists Obama has appointed and thus, has to be an extremist as well. For example, she was aware that former Green Czar Van Jones (who withdrew) had a long history of involvement in Communist Party causes, but still said she was “delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House.” She had to have known, because she married into a family with a pedigree of Communist Party involvement. Her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, worked closely with Obama mentor and Communist Party leader Frank Marshall Davis in a number of Communist Party front groups during the Cold War years. Valerie married Vernon’s son in 1983 and later became chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, where she was a key player in perhaps America’s most corrupt big city political machine. Obama does not go forward with anything without her counsel.
Political advisor – David AxelrodFor
those who think Axelrod is just a good campaign consultant, you
couldn’t be more wrong. Axelrod has a long history of working for
obscure socialist candidates and Obama was no different, politically,
from his other clients. In fact, promoting socialist causes was a family
tradition. His mother wrote for a New York City tabloid called PM Magazine,
which often promoted the Communist Party line. Indeed, author IF Stone,
later revealed to be working for the KGB, was PM’s DC correspondent.
Much of the tabloid’s funding came from Marshall Field, a hard left
millionaire who also funded Saul Alinsky’s training school. Axelrod has
spent his entire life promoting extremist candidates, but no one
bothered to look into his background. Today, he advises Obama on all
things political.
Director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change – Carol Browner
Browner previously served as head of the EPA during the Clinton regime where she advocated incredibly stupid environmental regulations that destroyed entire industries. At a time when America is losing jobs in record numbers, she is precisely the right person for the Obama job-killing machine. Browner is a socialist and was picked by Socialist International to be one of 14 leaders of a group it created called the Commission for a Sustainable World Society. SI believes in massive wealth redistribution from the West to the Third World, choosing to ignore the evidence that Third World countries are poor due to their socialist policies.
Moreover, SI constantly attacks the free market in general and the United States in particular. The fact that Obama has chosen both Browner and Todd Stern (Climate Czar) does not bode well for the American economy. The recent disclosure that the climate models used by Browner and Stern to justify draconian new regulations – such as Cap and Trade – are based on inaccurate data, has not fazed the Obama administration one bit. For Obama, environmentalism is a tool for increasing government control and nothing else.
General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Management & Budget – Preeta Bansal
Bansal is very close to Obama; she acts behind the scenes advising him regarding the selection of federal judges. She is on the far left side of the judicial spectrum and is a leader of the misnamed American Constitutional Society, a group that believes in a “living Constitution” and works to “debunk” the “original intent” concept. Indeed, ACS’s view that the Constitution should constantly change undermines the very purpose for having a constitution. Needless to say, the ACS is obsessed with criminal rights, illegal alien rights, terrorist rights, and other phony rights. ACS is America’s main networking group for far-left attorneys and is where Bansal is recruiting many of Obama’s judicial nominees.
Bansal is also a member of the “critical race theory (CRT)” school of legal thought that boils all legal concepts down to racist conspiracies and that racism permeates all aspects of American society. Indeed, she even co-authored a paper claiming that republicanism is based upon racist consensus. In other words, she believes the entire concept of representative democracy is based upon racist assumptions. Indeed, CRT advocates even believe the founding of America was primarily due to racial motivations.
Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals called CRT supporters the “lunatic core” of “radical legal egalitarianism.” Bansal is a lunatic and her appointment will ensure that Obama’s judicial appointments will be far more about “diversity” than they will be about competence.
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, Executive office of the President — Cecilia Munoz
Munoz is a hard-core open borders advocate who served recently as the Vice President for the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), where she supervised all legislative activities. La Raza is the nation’s foremost supporter of “rights” for illegal aliens and the granting of amnesty to the millions of illegals here in America. She does not care that illegal aliens are costing America billions of dollars; she believes they should enjoy the same rights as citizens. Not surprisingly, she served on the U.S. Programs board of the
Open Society Institute, a George Soros-funded group. You can expect Munoz to quietly push for a massive transfer of benefits and welfare to illegal aliens and for legislation granting amnesty to all those here illegally.
Director, Domestic Policy Council – Melody Barnes
Barnes is a certified wacko. She was previously Vice President of the far-left Center for American Progress and also served as Chief Counsel for Senator Ted Kennedy on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her view on abortion is so extreme, she served on the boards of both Emily’s List and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. She favors unrestricted abortions for any reason at any time of pregnancy.
Incredibly, some naïve pro-life leaders supported Obama, believing he was pro-life because he supposedly wanted to find ways to reduce abortions. Barnes has put that myth to rest. In a meeting with key pro-family leaders, Barnes made it clear that “It is not our goal to reduce the number of abortions.” As reported, the room went silent.
Barnes glorifies abortion as being a “concept of liberty that includes women as equal.” She has written that “reproductive rights are human rights.” My guess is that the baby being aborted doesn’t quite feel the same way. Needless to say, there will NOT be any pro-life measures supported by this administration. The Nation magazine praised Barnes as a “dyed-in-the-wool progressive,” a nice term for a socialist. She is also a former staff member for the American Constitutional Society, the far-left legal group mentioned elsewhere.
To the contrary, the Obama team did investigate thoroughly and they choose precisely. When an administration repeatedly nominates hard-left individuals, it’s not a vetting error—it’s a pattern. We should not allow the media to portray these appointments as a series of errors; but rather, we need to realize that Team Obama is simply nominating those who share their goal of radically changing America.
Most Americans have a hard time understanding this because they refuse to believe Obama is this extreme. But he is. For a year prior to his election conservatives warned voters that everything we knew about Obama indicated that his views were far from the mainstream. This was obvious when one analyzed his friends, which groups he funded while a “community activist,” his Illinois State Senate record, his United States Senate record and even what he wrote in his own books.
The reality, of course, is that Obama’s views are far from the mainstream and it is embarrassing so many Americans fell for his leftist candy-coated lies. Indeed, it appears that Obama is the most far left President in American history. His appointees only confirm this. These appointees hail from the crowd who regard their pedigree as the 60’s activists who cheered on the Vietcong, while American boys were slaughtered in the jungles of Vietnam. They hate America, or more precisely, they hate America’s heritage; American institutions, and the American Constitution.
Many of these extremists nominated by Obama hail from academia, where they were shielded from outside scrutiny while they quietly indoctrinated our youth. But don’t let the cloak of academia fool you; they are out to change America in ways most Americans oppose. More importantly, Americans need to realize their views are Obama’s views.
The American media is partly responsible for bringing such extremists to power. There is little doubt the media engaged in a massive propaganda effort to convince Americans that Obama was some kind of hip moderate; a breath of fresh air, a reformer, and someone who would fight the corrupt ways of Washington. Until Americans wake up and stop relying on the mainstream media for their source of news, they will continue to pay a heavy price for their ignorance. Unfortunately, this report covers just a few of Obama’s policy-makers, but there are many more such extremists within his administration.
The Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein
Sunstein was nominated and approved to be Obama’s “Regulatory Czar.” He supports massive gun control and doesn’t believe the 2nd Amendment is an individual right. He has straight out said, “We ought to ban hunting.” While this fruitcake strips Americans of their Constitutional right to own guns, he wants to give rights to animals and has argued that “Animals should be permitted to bring suit…” Naturally, he also supports the “Fairness Doctrine,” the wrongly-named concept which allows the government to regulate the airwaves.
Climate Czar – Todd Stern
Since then, new evidence has revealed that the major climate models used to justify the Global Warming alarm was, in fact, not accurate. One would think Stern would address this, but chances are he won’t. Climate change seems to be more about giving the government control over our lives, than about phony climate crises. Indeed, Stern has made it clear that he thinks international agencies, such as the United Nations, should take the lead on forcing climate change down the throats of national governments. Stern has even gone as far as to propose that world powers form an “E8” group, who would meet yearly and dictate environmental policy to the rest of the world. What about national sovereignty? Clearly, Stern feels that’s an outdated concept.
Stern is also the nutcase behind the Cap and Trade proposal which, even an analysis by Obama’s own Treasury Department concluded, would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion dollars—just what we need for today’s economy!
Science Czar – John Holdren
In his book, Holdren advocates some of the most bizarre
and horrifying policy stances imaginable. In the event of a
“over-population crises,” Holdren supports “laws requiring compulsory
abortion,” government confiscation of new born babies, the “development
of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the
skin,” and, incredibly, “adding a sterilant to drinking water or stable
foods….” as long a livestock would not be affected (as experimentally
implemented in India). Holdren wants the government to dictate family
size and advocate a “planetary regime,” run by the United Nations. This
real life Dr. Frankenstein will be deciding science policy for the
United States of America.
Chief Diversity Officer, Federal Communications Commission – Mark Lloyd
While Obama is playing coy with his plans to shut down
conservative talk radio, we know what his real intentions are, due to
his appointment of Mark Lloyd. Lloyd’s view of the 1st Amendment is
shocking:
“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.
This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references
to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination
of other communications policies. “[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect
global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”
Like many of Obama’s appointees, Lloyd worked for
George Soros, the foreign billionaire who funds anti-America groups. He
seems to be enamored with dictators and has even publicly praised
Venezuelan Communist dictator Hugo Chavez’s “incredible…democratic
revolution.” He also wants to use the Fairness Doctrine to “balance”
talk radio and believes there are too many white people in the media. He
has written that unless there are “more people of color, gays and other
people…we will not change the problem.” One of his solutions to
“balance” the media is to fine conservative radio stations up to $250
million and give the proceeds to National Public Radio. Get ready for
censorship like America has never seen before.
Attorney General – Eric Holder
- Jennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. They’re sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way. Regardless, Obama must have been impressed with Jennings, as he appointed him to carry out his perverted mission nationwide in his new role as head of the Department’s “Office of Safe & Drug Free Schools.”
More seriously, she is overly cautious in regard to fighting terrorism. The former Ambassador to Sudan implicated Rice as the person who bungled the opportunity to take out Osama bin Laden when Sudanese officials offered him to the USA on a silver platter during the Clinton years.
She rejected their offer. There’s a good chance 9/11 could have been avoided if Rice had accepted the Sudanese offer. Apparently, even though she worked for the NSC, she didn’t regard Al-Qaeda as a threat. No wonder we were hit on 9/11. And now she’s our UN Ambassador? I wonder whose interests she will serve…probably the UNs.
Counsel, State Department – Harold Koh
The man Obama has named as the State Department’s legal advisor is
Harold Koh. Koh believes America should defer to the International Court
of Justice to determine legal precedents; a totally unconstitutional
endeavor. He is a member of the “trans-nationalism” school of legal
thought that believes all distinctions between American Constitutional
law and international law should vanish. Incredibly, he even believes
Muslim law –Sharia law– should be applied to some disputes in US courts.
Clearly, his views are in contradiction to the Constitution he swore to
uphold, but no matter, he is now in charge of all legal issues for the
U.S. State Department.National Security Council – Samantha Power
Senior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs – Valerie Jarrett Jarrett is involved with vetting all the extremists Obama has appointed and thus, has to be an extremist as well. For example, she was aware that former Green Czar Van Jones (who withdrew) had a long history of involvement in Communist Party causes, but still said she was “delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House.” She had to have known, because she married into a family with a pedigree of Communist Party involvement. Her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, worked closely with Obama mentor and Communist Party leader Frank Marshall Davis in a number of Communist Party front groups during the Cold War years. Valerie married Vernon’s son in 1983 and later became chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, where she was a key player in perhaps America’s most corrupt big city political machine. Obama does not go forward with anything without her counsel.
Director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change – Carol Browner
Browner previously served as head of the EPA during the Clinton regime where she advocated incredibly stupid environmental regulations that destroyed entire industries. At a time when America is losing jobs in record numbers, she is precisely the right person for the Obama job-killing machine. Browner is a socialist and was picked by Socialist International to be one of 14 leaders of a group it created called the Commission for a Sustainable World Society. SI believes in massive wealth redistribution from the West to the Third World, choosing to ignore the evidence that Third World countries are poor due to their socialist policies.
Moreover, SI constantly attacks the free market in general and the United States in particular. The fact that Obama has chosen both Browner and Todd Stern (Climate Czar) does not bode well for the American economy. The recent disclosure that the climate models used by Browner and Stern to justify draconian new regulations – such as Cap and Trade – are based on inaccurate data, has not fazed the Obama administration one bit. For Obama, environmentalism is a tool for increasing government control and nothing else.
General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Management & Budget – Preeta Bansal
Bansal is very close to Obama; she acts behind the scenes advising him regarding the selection of federal judges. She is on the far left side of the judicial spectrum and is a leader of the misnamed American Constitutional Society, a group that believes in a “living Constitution” and works to “debunk” the “original intent” concept. Indeed, ACS’s view that the Constitution should constantly change undermines the very purpose for having a constitution. Needless to say, the ACS is obsessed with criminal rights, illegal alien rights, terrorist rights, and other phony rights. ACS is America’s main networking group for far-left attorneys and is where Bansal is recruiting many of Obama’s judicial nominees.
Bansal is also a member of the “critical race theory (CRT)” school of legal thought that boils all legal concepts down to racist conspiracies and that racism permeates all aspects of American society. Indeed, she even co-authored a paper claiming that republicanism is based upon racist consensus. In other words, she believes the entire concept of representative democracy is based upon racist assumptions. Indeed, CRT advocates even believe the founding of America was primarily due to racial motivations.
Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals called CRT supporters the “lunatic core” of “radical legal egalitarianism.” Bansal is a lunatic and her appointment will ensure that Obama’s judicial appointments will be far more about “diversity” than they will be about competence.
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, Executive office of the President — Cecilia Munoz
Munoz is a hard-core open borders advocate who served recently as the Vice President for the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), where she supervised all legislative activities. La Raza is the nation’s foremost supporter of “rights” for illegal aliens and the granting of amnesty to the millions of illegals here in America. She does not care that illegal aliens are costing America billions of dollars; she believes they should enjoy the same rights as citizens. Not surprisingly, she served on the U.S. Programs board of the
Open Society Institute, a George Soros-funded group. You can expect Munoz to quietly push for a massive transfer of benefits and welfare to illegal aliens and for legislation granting amnesty to all those here illegally.
Director, Domestic Policy Council – Melody Barnes
Barnes is a certified wacko. She was previously Vice President of the far-left Center for American Progress and also served as Chief Counsel for Senator Ted Kennedy on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her view on abortion is so extreme, she served on the boards of both Emily’s List and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. She favors unrestricted abortions for any reason at any time of pregnancy.
Incredibly, some naïve pro-life leaders supported Obama, believing he was pro-life because he supposedly wanted to find ways to reduce abortions. Barnes has put that myth to rest. In a meeting with key pro-family leaders, Barnes made it clear that “It is not our goal to reduce the number of abortions.” As reported, the room went silent.
Barnes glorifies abortion as being a “concept of liberty that includes women as equal.” She has written that “reproductive rights are human rights.” My guess is that the baby being aborted doesn’t quite feel the same way. Needless to say, there will NOT be any pro-life measures supported by this administration. The Nation magazine praised Barnes as a “dyed-in-the-wool progressive,” a nice term for a socialist. She is also a former staff member for the American Constitutional Society, the far-left legal group mentioned elsewhere.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
California bill would give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants
More immigrants living in the U.S. illegally would be able to obtain a
California driver's license under a bill that is moving through the
state Legislature.
A measure from Democratic Assemblyman Luis Alejo, of Watsonville, would allow people without a Social Security number to apply for a license. They must show several alternative forms of identification, including a birth certificate and proof of residency.
Unauthorized immigrants seeking a license also must pass a driving test like other applicants.
The legislation, which passed the state Assembly on Wednesday, follows a law approved last year that allowed driver's licenses to be issued to unauthorized immigrants who are eligible for work permits under a revised federal policy.
Alejo said his bill, AB60, would increase safety on California roads. A recent study by the state Department of Motor Vehicles showed that unlicensed drivers are nearly three times as likely to cause a crash, he said.
"This is a good public policy to allow immigrant families across California to be able to take the exam, learn the rules of the road, learn our safe traffic laws, pass the driving exam," Alejo said.
Roughly 2 million people in California would become eligible for a driver's license or ID card under the legislation, according to a committee analysis.
Republican lawmakers opposing the bill said loosening the requirements on who can possess a driver's license would jeopardize other uses for the IDs, such as showing a driver's license as ID to board a plane.
"It is a federal document accepted by federal standards to be identification for other means besides driving," said Assemblyman Curt Hagman, R-Chino Hills. "It is your security document."
Before a law approved in 1993, immigration status was not a factor in seeking a California license, said Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles. He countered that a driver's license is not the only identification accepted at airports, pulling out the U.S. passport card he uses when flying to Sacramento.
"This is not about immigration policy," Perez said. "It is about what it takes to prove that you are competent to drive under California's laws that are applicable to our roads."
The Assembly approved AB60 on a vote of 53-20, sending it to the Senate. If approved and signed by the governor, it would take effect Jan. 1, 2015.
Four states - New Mexico, Utah, Washington and Illinois - allow those who are in the U.S. illegally to apply for driver's licenses.
A measure from Democratic Assemblyman Luis Alejo, of Watsonville, would allow people without a Social Security number to apply for a license. They must show several alternative forms of identification, including a birth certificate and proof of residency.
Unauthorized immigrants seeking a license also must pass a driving test like other applicants.
The legislation, which passed the state Assembly on Wednesday, follows a law approved last year that allowed driver's licenses to be issued to unauthorized immigrants who are eligible for work permits under a revised federal policy.
Alejo said his bill, AB60, would increase safety on California roads. A recent study by the state Department of Motor Vehicles showed that unlicensed drivers are nearly three times as likely to cause a crash, he said.
"This is a good public policy to allow immigrant families across California to be able to take the exam, learn the rules of the road, learn our safe traffic laws, pass the driving exam," Alejo said.
Roughly 2 million people in California would become eligible for a driver's license or ID card under the legislation, according to a committee analysis.
Republican lawmakers opposing the bill said loosening the requirements on who can possess a driver's license would jeopardize other uses for the IDs, such as showing a driver's license as ID to board a plane.
"It is a federal document accepted by federal standards to be identification for other means besides driving," said Assemblyman Curt Hagman, R-Chino Hills. "It is your security document."
Before a law approved in 1993, immigration status was not a factor in seeking a California license, said Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles. He countered that a driver's license is not the only identification accepted at airports, pulling out the U.S. passport card he uses when flying to Sacramento.
"This is not about immigration policy," Perez said. "It is about what it takes to prove that you are competent to drive under California's laws that are applicable to our roads."
The Assembly approved AB60 on a vote of 53-20, sending it to the Senate. If approved and signed by the governor, it would take effect Jan. 1, 2015.
Four states - New Mexico, Utah, Washington and Illinois - allow those who are in the U.S. illegally to apply for driver's licenses.
Many Americans May Lose Current Health Policies Under ObamaCare
Many Americans who buy their own health insurance could have their
policies cancelled because they aren't up to standards of Obama's health
care law.
http://www.foxnews.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Tit for Tat ? ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) — A statue of abolitionist Frederick Douglass was ripped from its base in Rochester on the an...
-
NEW YORK (AP) — As New York City faced one of its darkest days with the death toll from the coronavirus surging past 4,000 — more th...