NBC and MSNBC embraced Sen. Elizabeth Warren
of Massachusetts in the first debate of Democratic presidential
candidates Wednesday night, treating her like the star of the show. The
debate led off with Warren, who had a huge popularity advantage from the
start.
Warren – who Trump dubbed “Pocahontas”
because of her phony claim of Native American heritage – was the only
Democrat on stage who had mustered double digits in recent polling.
Moderators let her dominate the early part of the debate, when most
people were likely watching.
NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie started
it off sounding more like Warren’s press secretary. “You have many plans
– free college, free child care, government health care, cancelation of
student debt, new taxes, new regulations, the breakup of major
corporations,” Guthrie said, before teeing up an economy question.
Guthrie even used Warren’s plan to break up tech companies as the
foundation for a question for Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.
The
networks did it again halfway through. At 10 p.m. EDT, after some
embarrassing tech issues that let Warren mull a question for several
minutes, the debate went full-on pro-Democrat. NBC brought in bigtime
liberal MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow and “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd.
Once more they turned to Warren to set the agenda by asking her a gun
control question;
“We are less than 50 miles from Parkland,
Florida, where 17 people were killed in a school shooting last year and
where there has been significant activism on gun violence ever since,”
began Todd.
NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie started it off sounding more like Warren’s press secretary.
And,
in case that wasn’t clear enough, the round-robin final comments also
ended with Warren, as Maddow asked her for the “final, final statement.”
That let NBC bookend the entire debate with Warren and Warren.
The
Twitter account of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii made the same point.
With a signature as “-V (Tulsi's sister),” it slammed the network. “It's
clear who MSNBC wants to be president: Elizabeth Warren. They're giving
her more time than all the other candidates combined. They aren't
giving any time to Tulsi at all.”
The time element evened out a
bit. Warren ended up third, according to The New York Times. Reporter
Nick Corasaniti? tweeted that, prior to the “45 second closing
statements,” Booker came in first with former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke
second. Warren came in a solid third for time.
CNN political
commentator Van Jones was much like NBC. He started and ended the night
in the Warren camp. Going in, he described Warren as “the massive star
of the night.”
Jones was positive about all the candidates but
continued to back the senator from Massachusetts. “Elizabeth Warren
looked like a college professor with a bunch of graduate students around
her half the time. She is able to go back and forth between policy and
the human thing better than anybody,” he concluded.
While Warren
certainly did well with the network assist, MSNBC host Chris Matthews
made a good point afterward, crediting former Vice President Joe Biden –
who debates Thursday night – with the victory.
“I think the
winner tonight, though, was probably Joe Biden because, to quote
Sherlock Holmes, the dog wasn't barking tonight,” Matthews said. “No one
took on the Democratic frontrunner the whole two hours.”
Where Was Trump?
We
all live in President Trump’s America – whether you like it or not. But
Warren and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio never even mentioned
Trump. Just as Biden was left unscathed, Trump didn’t muster a lot of
attention either.
According to NBC News, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of
Minnesota led the pack with nine mentions of the president. But the
elephant in the room still dominated. MSNBC anchor Brian Williams even
made a Harry Potter-Lord Voldemort allusion by referring to Trump as “he
who will not be mentioned,” in a post-debate recap.
Perhaps it
was Trump’s threat to tweet during the debate that had Dems running
scared. Even though he never went on a tweet storm, he still tossed in a
few comments. These included a damning comment 35 minutes in, calling
the debate “BORING!” and criticizing the tech failures. He followed that
by tweeting a humorous animation of Trump campaign signs all the way up
to “Trump 2048.”
The official Trump response to the debate
annoyed New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman?, who complained on
Twitter: “Trump campaign issues six-paragraph statement in response to
debate potus called boring. It’s so long I can’t screenshot it all.”
Former
CBS anchor Dan Rather noted some candidates spoke a bit of Spanish and
used it to attack Trump. “I think there are more candidates on stage who
speak Spanish more fluently than our president speaks English,” he
wrote.
Author and New America fellow Jill Filipovic summarized
liberal frustrations with the president. “The fact that any one of these
people may actually lose to Donald Trump is such an indictment of our
country,” she tweeted.
Federalist Senior Editor Mollie Hemingway
mocked when former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro
went extreme on abortion, calling for “reproductive justice.”
“Julian
Castro says he supports abortion for women who identify as men as
well,” Hemingway commented. “Audience cheers. This bloody abortion fest
is off the rails. Expect media reaction to be muted, however, since they
are radical partisans on the issue.”
Most
of the candidates wanted a breakout moment. Vanity Fair tweeted
somewhat fairly that, “Of all the men and women seeking the White House,
perhaps 5 or 6 have a fighting chance. Everyone else is effectively
fighting for scraps.”
At least six of those on stage Wednesday
night could walk down the streets of most American cities and go
unrecognized. They are all trying desperately to use media exposure to
change that.