Saturday, August 29, 2020
Trump administration allows deferral of Social Security tax
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Friday allowed employers to suspend collection of some Social Security taxes, although business groups don’t like the idea and it may create political headaches for Republicans. Democrats are already saying it would undermine retirement benefits.
The
Treasury Department guidance came late in the day, less than 24 hours
after the conclusion of the Republican National Convention and a speech
by President Donald Trump in which he promised to protect Social
Security and Medicare.
It
allows employers to offer their workers a temporary deferral of the
6.2% payroll tax employees pay into the Social Security Trust Fund for
the rest of this year. The taxes owed would not be forgiven, and instead
would come due in 2021.
It’s
unclear how many employers will take the option, since implementing it
would involve additional effort and expenses on their part.
“The
guidance allows employers to defer withholding and paying the
employee’s portion of the Social Security payroll tax if the employee’s
wages are below a certain amount,” Treasury said in a terse press
release. The earnings cutoff is $104,000 a year.
Trump
had ordered the tax deferral in early August after Congress deadlocked
on the latest coronavirus relief bill. The president argues more money
in workers’ pockets for the rest of this year will translate to a boost
for the economy.
But
major business groups traditionally allied with the White House called
the idea unworkable for employers and unfair to workers. Employers
wanted to avoid the hassle of having to collect the deferred taxes later
on from their workers.
Neil
Bradley, policy chief for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said Friday
night the Treasury guidance leaves many practical questions unanswered.
“However,
it makes clear that employees will be required to pay more taxes
beginning in January to offset any benefit they receive now,” Bradley
said. “The only way to achieve a workable proposal is for Congress and
the administration to come together and enact a change in the law.”
Lawmakers have little desire to tinker with Social Security.
An
analysis by the Chamber found that a hypothetical worker making $75,000
a year would get nearly $179 more every two weeks through the rest of
this year. But that same worker would owe about $1,610 next year. A
worker making $35,000 would get about $83 more biweekly the rest of this
year, and owe just over $750 next year.
Separately,
AARP wrote Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to express concerns about
the potential consequences for Social Security finances.
Regardless of the practical impact of Treasury’s action, it appears Social Security will be thrust into the election maelstrom.
Trump
has also teased that if he’s reelected he would press for a permanent
cut in Social Security taxes. Although the president argues it will help
revive an economy battered by the coronavirus, many economists
disagree.
“At
the end of the year, the assumption that I win, I’m going to terminate
the payroll tax, which is another thing that some of the great
economists would like to see done,” Trump told reporters earlier this
month, adding that “tremendous growth” in the U.S. will cover the costs
of Social Security. “We’ll be paying into Social Security through the
general fund.”
White
House aides insist that Trump is only referring to permanently
forgiving the taxes that would be deferred this year, but the president
himself has repeatedly indicated he has much bigger ideas in mind.
As a candidate in 2016, Trump promised not to cut Social Security and
Medicare, and Democrats say he has now abandoned that promise.
“He
is defunding Social Security and breaking his promise — it’s staring us
in the face,” said Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., who chairs a subcommittee
that oversees the program. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden
has joined the criticism.
While
the president has the authority to defer collection of the tax in a
national emergency, only Congress can forgive the amounts owed. Trump
directed Mnuchin to work with lawmakers to secure that goal.
Administration officials say any legislation would repay the Social
Security Trust Fund as well.
But congressional Republicans have shown little interest.
Many
economists say the policy is dubious. While it would put more money in
workers’ pockets, people might not spend it if they’re afraid the
government will ask for it back. Also, a payroll tax deferral benefits
those who are working, not the unemployed going without a $600 weekly
benefit from the federal government that has lapsed.
The White House says Trump’s commitment to Social Security is ironclad.
Trump to head to Louisiana as Hurricane Laura cleanup starts
LAKE
CHARLES, La. (AP) — The angry storm surge has receded and the clean up
has begun from Hurricane Laura, but officials along this shattered
stretch of Louisiana coast are warning returning residents they will
face weeks without power or water amid the hot, stifling days of late
summer.
The
U.S. toll from the Category 4 hurricane stood at 14 deaths, with more
than half of those killed by carbon monoxide poisoning from the unsafe
operation of generators.
President
Donald Trump plans on Saturday to tour the damage in Louisiana and
neighboring Texas. He told reporters he considered delaying his Thursday
night speech accepting the Republican Party’s nomination for reelection
because of the storm. But he said that, as “it turned out, we got a
little bit lucky. It was very big, it was very powerful, but it passed
quickly. ”
Across
southwestern Louisiana, people were cleaning up from the destructive
hurricane that roared ashore early Thursday, packing 150-mph (240-kph)
winds. Many were deciding whether they wanted to stay in miserable
conditions or wait until basic services are finally restored.
Lauren
Sylvester returned to her townhouse in Lake Charles on Friday after
heeding a mandatory evacuation order and staying with her mother in a
city about 95 miles (130 kilometers) away.
The inside of her unit was not directly damaged, but the roof lost shingles. Around her home, it was a different story. Power lines and trees were down.
“It’s
still an incredible amount of damage,” said Sylvester, who was heading
back to her mother’s house as soon as she finished cleaning up.
Simply
driving was a feat in Lake Charles, a city of 80,000 residents hit head
on by the hurricane’s eye. Power lines and trees blocked paths or
created one-lane roads that drivers had to navigate with oncoming
traffic. Street signs were snapped off their posts or dangling. No
stoplights worked, making it an exercise in trust with other motorists
sharing the roads.
Mayor
Nic Hunter cautioned that there was no timetable for restoring
electricity and that water-treatment plants “took a beating,” leaving
barely a trickle of water coming out of most faucets. “If you come back
to Lake Charles to stay, make sure you understand the above reality and
are prepared to live in it for many days, probably weeks,” Hunter wrote
on Facebook.
Caravans of utility trucks were met Friday by thunderstorms in the sizzling heat, complicating recovery efforts.
The
Louisiana Department of Health estimated that more than 220,000 people
were without water. Restoration of those services could take weeks or
months, and full rebuilding could take years.
Forty
nursing homes were relying on generators, and assessments were underway
to determine if more than 860 residents in 11 facilities that had been
evacuated could return.
The
much weaker remnants of the hurricane continued to move across the
Southern U.S., unleashing heavy rain and isolated tornadoes. North
Carolina and Virginia could get the brunt of the worst weather Saturday,
forecasters said.
When
the storm moves back over the Atlantic Ocean, forecasters said it could
become a tropical storm again and threaten Newfoundland, Canada.
Louisiana
Gov. John Bel Edwards called Laura the most powerful hurricane to
strike Louisiana, meaning it surpassed even Katrina, which was a
Category 3 storm when it hit in 2005. He said Friday that officials now
believe the surge was as high as 15 feet (4.5 meters).
The hurricane also killed nearly two dozen people in Haiti and the Dominican Republic en route to the Gulf Coast.
In
Lake Charles, chainsaws buzzed and heavy machinery hauled tree limbs in
the front lawn of Stanley and Dominique Hazelton, who rode out the
storm on a bathroom floor. A tree punctured the roof not far from where
the couple was taking cover.
They regretted staying.
“There’s
people without homes,” Stanley Hazelton said. “So it was dumb. We’ll
never do it again. We’ll never stay through another hurricane again.”
___
Associated
Press contributors include Jamie Stengle in Dallas; Janet McConnaughey
in New Orleans; John L. Mone in Holly Beach, Louisiana; Paul J. Weber in
Austin, Texas; Seth Borenstein in Kensington, Maryland; and Adrian
Sainz in Memphis, Tennessee.
Portland rioters stage sit-in at mayor's home
Dumb & Dumber Mayor Ted Wheeler |
A group of Portland, Ore.rioters staged
a sit-in inside the lobby of Mayor Ted Wheeler’s condominium building
Friday evening while others held a loud concert outside.
The rioters said they wouldn’t leave until Wheeler meets with them over their demands that he resign, reduce the Portland Police Bureau budget and never vote to increase police spending.
The protest appeared to be peaceful as of 10 p.m. local time, although red-paint handprints were seen on the glass outside the lobby, according to independent journalist Garrison Davis.
Some of the protesters had left by 10 p.m. for unspecified "safety reasons," Davis reported.
Late Friday, Wheeler's office released a statement saying, "We are monitoring the situation and hope rioters remain peaceful for the safety of other residents," according to KION-TV reporter Jennifer Dowling.
It was not immediately clear if Wheeler was home during the protest.
Earlier, Wheeler tweeted a message, praising the rioters' efforts.
“Thank you Portlanders for a powerful display of solidarity at last night's demonstrations,” he tweeted. “Racial justice requires the entire community to come together. Let's continue to focus on the work ahead and move forward with reform, recovery and resilience plans for PDX.”
Earlier Friday, Wheeler wrote a letter to President Trump, declining an offer of more federal officers to quell rioting that has plagued the city since the May 25 death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis.
“We don’t need your politics of division and demagoguery,” he wrote. “When you sent he Feds to Portland last month you made the situation far worse. Your offer to repeat that disaster is a cynical attempt to stoke fear and distract us from the real work of our city.”
Wheeler also condemned violence and vandalism that has marred mostly peaceful protests.
“There is no place for looting, arson or vandalism in our city,” he wrote. “There is no room here for racist violence or those who wish to bring their ideology of hate into our community. Those who commit criminal acts will be apprehended and prosecuted under the law."
The presence and tactics of federal agents who were sent to the city last month to protect the federal building downtown amid nightly protests were highly controversial. Agents have since been drawn down.
The local U.S. attorney announced Thursday that 74 people are now facing federal misdemeanor and felony charges related to protesting, include assaults on federal officers, arson and damaging federal property.
In a tweet a few hours later, Trump called Wheeler “incompetent” and said if he couldn’t get control of the city “we will go in and take care of matters the way they should have been taken care of 100 days ago!”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The rioters said they wouldn’t leave until Wheeler meets with them over their demands that he resign, reduce the Portland Police Bureau budget and never vote to increase police spending.
The protest appeared to be peaceful as of 10 p.m. local time, although red-paint handprints were seen on the glass outside the lobby, according to independent journalist Garrison Davis.
Some of the protesters had left by 10 p.m. for unspecified "safety reasons," Davis reported.
Late Friday, Wheeler's office released a statement saying, "We are monitoring the situation and hope rioters remain peaceful for the safety of other residents," according to KION-TV reporter Jennifer Dowling.
It was not immediately clear if Wheeler was home during the protest.
Earlier, Wheeler tweeted a message, praising the rioters' efforts.
“Thank you Portlanders for a powerful display of solidarity at last night's demonstrations,” he tweeted. “Racial justice requires the entire community to come together. Let's continue to focus on the work ahead and move forward with reform, recovery and resilience plans for PDX.”
Earlier Friday, Wheeler wrote a letter to President Trump, declining an offer of more federal officers to quell rioting that has plagued the city since the May 25 death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis.
“We don’t need your politics of division and demagoguery,” he wrote. “When you sent he Feds to Portland last month you made the situation far worse. Your offer to repeat that disaster is a cynical attempt to stoke fear and distract us from the real work of our city.”
Wheeler also condemned violence and vandalism that has marred mostly peaceful protests.
“There is no place for looting, arson or vandalism in our city,” he wrote. “There is no room here for racist violence or those who wish to bring their ideology of hate into our community. Those who commit criminal acts will be apprehended and prosecuted under the law."
The presence and tactics of federal agents who were sent to the city last month to protect the federal building downtown amid nightly protests were highly controversial. Agents have since been drawn down.
The local U.S. attorney announced Thursday that 74 people are now facing federal misdemeanor and felony charges related to protesting, include assaults on federal officers, arson and damaging federal property.
In a tweet a few hours later, Trump called Wheeler “incompetent” and said if he couldn’t get control of the city “we will go in and take care of matters the way they should have been taken care of 100 days ago!”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
House bill would block rioters from coronavirus unemployment benefits
A House Republican introduced a bill Friday that would make those charged with violence, looting or vandalism in connection with a protest ineligible for enhanced coronavirus unemployment benefits.
The “Support Peaceful Protest Act” would also make rioters “financially liable for the cost of federal policing,” according to the bill, which is sponsored by U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind.
“If you’re convicted of a crime that caused more manpower and law enforcement officers to deal with it, then perhaps you should be on the hook to pay for that,” Banks told WIBC-FM in Indianapolis.
Banks said he introduced the bill the day after an older couple who are his constituents were harassed by protesters while leaving President Trump’s nomination acceptance speech at the White House on Thursday evening.
He said many rioters have time to participate in violence because they are unemployed people receiving government benefits -- including increased federal benefits for those who have lost their jobs amid the pandemic.
“What we’re seeing happen in big cities and around the country are angry violent mobs showing up at federal properties, tearing down monuments on federal properties, especially in Washington, D.C. and it’s got to stop,” he said. “What my bill would do is add new consequences to those individuals who are breaking the law.”
Banks said he supports peaceful protest.
“There are a lot of Americans who are showing up at peaceful protests,” he said, adding that his bill is a “common sense” step to add some “accountability for some of these angry mob protests that are occurring around our country.”
“The people who are acting out in violence are very different from those who are showing up peacefully and it’s easy to see the difference,” he told WIBC.
He added that the option for peaceful protest is part of being an American, but causing harm to another person or defacing federal property isn’t OK.
“We should take those tax dollars away and say that those who break the law in violent protest shouldn’t receive taxpayer dollars."
The “Support Peaceful Protest Act” would also make rioters “financially liable for the cost of federal policing,” according to the bill, which is sponsored by U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind.
“If you’re convicted of a crime that caused more manpower and law enforcement officers to deal with it, then perhaps you should be on the hook to pay for that,” Banks told WIBC-FM in Indianapolis.
Banks said he introduced the bill the day after an older couple who are his constituents were harassed by protesters while leaving President Trump’s nomination acceptance speech at the White House on Thursday evening.
He said many rioters have time to participate in violence because they are unemployed people receiving government benefits -- including increased federal benefits for those who have lost their jobs amid the pandemic.
“What we’re seeing happen in big cities and around the country are angry violent mobs showing up at federal properties, tearing down monuments on federal properties, especially in Washington, D.C. and it’s got to stop,” he said. “What my bill would do is add new consequences to those individuals who are breaking the law.”
Banks said he supports peaceful protest.
U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind.
“There are a lot of Americans who are showing up at peaceful protests,” he said, adding that his bill is a “common sense” step to add some “accountability for some of these angry mob protests that are occurring around our country.”
“The people who are acting out in violence are very different from those who are showing up peacefully and it’s easy to see the difference,” he told WIBC.
He added that the option for peaceful protest is part of being an American, but causing harm to another person or defacing federal property isn’t OK.
“We should take those tax dollars away and say that those who break the law in violent protest shouldn’t receive taxpayer dollars."
Sarah Palin's lawsuit against NY Times can go to trial: judge
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times will go to a trial, according to a federal judge's ruling Friday.
There
was “sufficient evidence to allow a rational finder of fact to find
actual malice by clear and convincing evidence," Judge Jed S. Rakoff of Federal District Court in Manhattan determined.
The judge set a trial date for Feb. 1.
Palin expressed her gratitude for the judge's ruling, tweeting "Humbled and thankful."
The Times expressed a different view.
“We’re disappointed in the ruling but are confident we will prevail at trial when a jury hears the facts,” a Times spokesperson said in a statement published in the paper's own report on the ruling.
The former GOP vice-presidential candidate sued the Times for libel after a June 2017 editorial about the shooting of GOP U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise and others mentioned a map put out years earlier by SarahPAC that had crosshairs over different Democratic congressional districts. While the map had been used in reference to ObamaCare, the editorial connected it to Jared Loughner’s 2011 shooting of then-U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., whose district was among those identified in the map.
The
editorial said the SarahPAC map had Giffords and other Democrats under
crosshairs (though the targets were over their districts).
In discussing the Scalise shooting, the Times said, “Though there’s no sign of incitement as direct as in the Giffords attack, liberals should of course hold themselves to the same standard of decency that they ask of the right.”
The Times published a correction after receiving backlash for the editorial, noting that there was no link between the map and the shooting.
Fox News' Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.
The judge set a trial date for Feb. 1.
Palin expressed her gratitude for the judge's ruling, tweeting "Humbled and thankful."
The Times expressed a different view.
“We’re disappointed in the ruling but are confident we will prevail at trial when a jury hears the facts,” a Times spokesperson said in a statement published in the paper's own report on the ruling.
The former GOP vice-presidential candidate sued the Times for libel after a June 2017 editorial about the shooting of GOP U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise and others mentioned a map put out years earlier by SarahPAC that had crosshairs over different Democratic congressional districts. While the map had been used in reference to ObamaCare, the editorial connected it to Jared Loughner’s 2011 shooting of then-U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., whose district was among those identified in the map.
In discussing the Scalise shooting, the Times said, “Though there’s no sign of incitement as direct as in the Giffords attack, liberals should of course hold themselves to the same standard of decency that they ask of the right.”
The Times published a correction after receiving backlash for the editorial, noting that there was no link between the map and the shooting.
Fox News' Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.
Friday, August 28, 2020
Trump’s RNC finale outside White House triggers Dems: ‘Get off our lawn’
President Trump really knows how to push the Democrats Buttons :-) |
With a first-ever Republican Convention finale held outside the White House on Thursday night, President Trump and the GOP once again ignored Washington’s rules – and left Democrats fuming. :-)
“Get off our lawn,” former presidential candidate Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., tweeted as Trump formally accepted the GOP nomination in a speech on the South Lawn.
The Republican Party brought together more than 1,000 spectators for the final night of its quadrennial gathering – the makeshift event prompted by concerns about the coronavirus.
The party initially planned to hold a traditional-style convention in Charlotte, N.C., but ultimately decided against that, opting instead to have most of its speakers deliver their addresses from Washington’s Mellon Auditorium, just a short distance from the White House.
For Thursday’s finale, however, White House senior adviser Ivanka Trump and the president spoke to the crowd from a stage on the South Lawn.
Two large Trump campaign signs were posted on either side of the stage, irking Democrats who vented their frustrations on social media.
“My blood is boiling over political banners at the White House,” former U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri wrote. “Awful. Just awful.”
“Let’s
be clear,” wrote former presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg, a former
mayor of South Bend, Ind. “It is wrong and illegal to use federal
property and taxpayer resources for partisan campaigning.”
“A @JoeBiden presidency cannot come soon enough,” Buttigieg added in another tweet.
Other Democrats seemed bothered that Republicans appeared to be less worried than them about the coronavirus. Few attendees at the White House event appeared to be wearing masks, and most of the spectators sat closer to one another than the recommended social distancing length of six feet.
The GOP also appeared to flout the recommendations on previous nights, during a Wednesday event in Maryland featuring Vice President Mike Pence and during a Tuesday speech at the Rose Garden outside the White House featuring first lady Melania Trump.
“Is coronavirus gone? Is COVID-19 gone?” Biden campaign senior adviser Symone Sanders asked Thursday on a call with reporters, according to The Associated Press. “I didn’t see any masks or social distancing happening during the vice president’s speech last night. So, the reality is, there is a lack of leadership here.”
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
The Republican Party brought together more than 1,000 spectators for the final night of its quadrennial gathering – the makeshift event prompted by concerns about the coronavirus.
The party initially planned to hold a traditional-style convention in Charlotte, N.C., but ultimately decided against that, opting instead to have most of its speakers deliver their addresses from Washington’s Mellon Auditorium, just a short distance from the White House.
For Thursday’s finale, however, White House senior adviser Ivanka Trump and the president spoke to the crowd from a stage on the South Lawn.
Two large Trump campaign signs were posted on either side of the stage, irking Democrats who vented their frustrations on social media.
“My blood is boiling over political banners at the White House,” former U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri wrote. “Awful. Just awful.”
“A @JoeBiden presidency cannot come soon enough,” Buttigieg added in another tweet.
Other Democrats seemed bothered that Republicans appeared to be less worried than them about the coronavirus. Few attendees at the White House event appeared to be wearing masks, and most of the spectators sat closer to one another than the recommended social distancing length of six feet.
The GOP also appeared to flout the recommendations on previous nights, during a Wednesday event in Maryland featuring Vice President Mike Pence and during a Tuesday speech at the Rose Garden outside the White House featuring first lady Melania Trump.
“Is coronavirus gone? Is COVID-19 gone?” Biden campaign senior adviser Symone Sanders asked Thursday on a call with reporters, according to The Associated Press. “I didn’t see any masks or social distancing happening during the vice president’s speech last night. So, the reality is, there is a lack of leadership here.”
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Tit for Tat ? ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) — A statue of abolitionist Frederick Douglass was ripped from its base in Rochester on the an...
-
NEW YORK (AP) — As New York City faced one of its darkest days with the death toll from the coronavirus surging past 4,000 — more th...