Saturday, October 10, 2020

Viral clip shows Biden lowering his mask to cough in his hand

 


 

Joe Biden on Friday coughed into his hand during a campaign stop in Las Vegas, Nevada. 

Biden, who sported a mask and his iconic aviators at a voter drive-in event, had taken a moment to catch his breath while speaking to supporters. 

However, the Democratic nominee lowered his mask and coughed into his hand before covering his face again.

"You can't make this up. Joe Biden just removed his mask to cough in his hand. Talk about unsanitary!" GOP rapid response director Steve Guest reacted while sharing the clip. 

This isn't the first time Biden was criticized for his lack of sanitation. During an interview last March as the coronavirus outbreak was underway, the former VP similarly coughed into his hand but was immediately called out by CNN anchor Jake Tapper. 

"You know, you're supposed to cough into your elbow," Tapper told the Democratic nominee. "I learned that, actually, covering your White House."

"Actually, that's true," Biden conceded. "But fortunately, I'm alone in my home, but that's OK. I agree you're right."

placeholder

The CNN anchor, however, doubled down on the proper etiquette lesson.



"It's kinda just old school to do it with your hand," Tapper added while demonstrating with his elbow again. "Do it into your elbow. You're supposed to do it."

"Thank you," Biden grinned.

Larry Elder: Attacks on Trump’s COVID-19 response persist — what about errors by Biden and Fauci?

Larry Elder


Comedian Chris Rock, hosting "Saturday Night Live," summarized the feelings shared by much of President Trump-hating America when he quipped: "President Trump is in the hospital from COVID and I just want to say my heart goes out to COVID." The audience then erupted in laughter.

placeholder

During President Barack Obama’s administration, the country faced the H1N1 virus, or swine flu. Did the Obama administration, unlike the Trump administration, respond to that crisis with scientific-based action that saved the lives of untold Americans? Joe Biden aide Ron Klain, who served Vice President Biden in the White House during the Obama administration, candidly admitted no.

At a 2019 forum at the National Press Club, Klain said: "I was in the White House in 2009 and 2010. I was working for Vice President Biden. I wasn't involved directly in the H1N1 response, but I lived through it as a White House staffer, and what I would say about it is: A bunch of really talented, really great people were working on it, and we did every possible thing wrong. And 60 million Americans got H1N1 in that period of time, and it's just purely a fortuity that this isn't one of the great mass casualty events in American history. It had nothing to do with us doing anything right. It just had to do with luck."

Trump's enemies are accusing him of purposefully mismanaging the coronavirus pandemic. But this is par for the course in the Trump era.

After all, about 29% of the Democratic congressional delegation boycotted Trump's inauguration; several never attended any of the president's State of the Union speeches; Democrats have attempted to invoke the 25th Amendment by arguing that the president is mentally unfit; Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., accused him of violating the emoluments clause; there was a nearly three-year Russia-Trump collusion investigation; and Trump was impeached.

In addition, somehow The New York Times acquired several years of Trump’s income tax information, apparently revealing that Trump paid little or nothing in federal income taxes for many years.

And Trump has routinely been compared to Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, a dictator, a tyrant, a grifter and other things unsuitable for family consumption. As to Trump's handling of the coronavirus, Democrats like presidential rival Joe Biden literally accuse Trump of all but personally murdering more than 200,000 people.

placeholder

Trump, to the consternation of medical experts and Democratic politicians, frequently appeared maskless and continued to hold rallies and gatherings where social distancing and mask-wearing were not observed. Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein calls Trump's coronavirus response "homicidal negligence."

Goodness, does this make Dr. Anthony Fauci a co-conspirator? In a "60 Minutes" episode that aired March 8, Fauci expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of wearing masks: "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences: People keep fiddling with the mask, and they keep touching their face."

Is Biden a co-conspirator in this mass homicide for criticizing Trump, who, at the end of January, announced travel restrictions on aliens who had been in China in the preceding 14 days, preventing their entry into the U.S.?

The next day Biden tweeted: "We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."

Let us not forget that China lied to the world about when it first learned of the coronavirus and lied when it denied that there was human-to-human transmission of the deadly virus. As a result of those lies, the rest of the world played catch-up from the very beginning.

Furthermore, according to a recent study by the University of California, Los Angeles, the virus may have been in America months sooner than initially thought. Therefore, we may be underestimating the number of Americans who have already contracted the virus.

placeholder

UCLA Health writes: "UCLA researchers and colleagues who analyzed electronic health records found that there was a significant increase in patients with coughs and acute respiratory failure at UCLA Health hospitals and clinics beginning in late December 2019, suggesting that COVID-19 may have been circulating in the area months before the first definitive cases in the U.S. were identified."

Expert medical advice continues to evolve during the course of this pandemic. Trump, as he told The Washington Post's Bob Woodward, wanted to project an image of calm.

Trump also recognized that dealing with this crisis, like most things in life, requires trade-offs. Shutting down the economy has unintended costs, including but not limited to divorce, alcoholism, drug addiction and domestic violence. Not an easy call for Trump to make.

In the meantime, can even Trump-haters pray for his full recovery? Or at least pretend to?

 

Trump says he's 'medication free,' details COVID-19 recovery in first on-camera interview since diagnosis

 


 

President Trump opened up about his ongoing recovery from the novel coronavirus on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Friday, sitting down for his first on-camera interview since he tested positive last week. 

Speaking to Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel in a remote interview from the White House, Trump said he was “medication free” as of Friday and feeling "really, really strong." 

The president acknowledged that before he went to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Oct. 2, he “didn't feel very vital" and "didn't feel like the president of the U.S. should feel."

Trump returned to the White House on Monday after spending three nights at the Bethesda, Md., hospital. He touted the beneficial effects of Regeneron’s experimental antibody cocktail, which he said made a “tremendous difference” in his recovery.

The president also said he underwent CT scans on his lungs upon arrival at Walter Reed, but did not experience difficulty breathing.

"They wanted to keep me for observation," Trump said. "You know, they wanted to be sure it was good. But ... I was there for, I guess, three-and-a-half days. They wanted to keep me. I wanted to leave after the first day. I really felt I was in not bad shape. After the first day, I think I would have been in much worse shape had I not taken this [Regeneron] medication."

The president faced criticism last weekend after he briefly left Walter Reed on Sunday to wave to supporters who had gathered outside the medical facility. 

placeholder

"I could hear them from the hospital," Trump recalled. "I was way up high. And, you know, [I'm in] this very fortified military hospital that's, you know, built to the highest standard. And yet through these very powerful windows, I could hear people screaming and shouting and with love, with real love.

"And after two days, I said, 'You know, I want to go out and say hello to the people.' And I went to Secret Service. And these are the people that are with me all the time. And they said, 'We have no problem, sir.' I said, 'I just want to take a drive by them and just wave.' And you saw what happened. 

“It was a great display of love out there,” Trump said of the drive. “I don’t think there was one negative person, and there was many, many, many people.”

On Thursday, White House physician Dr. Sean Conley sent out a memorandum stating that Trump could resume public engagements beginning Saturday.

The president is scheduled to hold an event honoring law enforcement at the White House on Saturday afternoon before traveling to Sanford, Fla. for a campaign rally Monday evening.

Trump said he was tested for the coronavirus on Friday and did not know the exact results, but was “either the bottom of the scale or free” of the virus. He expected to be tested again on Saturday.

placeholder

The president added that he would donate plasma to help other patients if asked.

Trump appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” hours after the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) canceled its scheduled Oct. 15 event. On Thursday, the president told FOX Business anchor Maria Bartiromo he would not “waste his time” with a virtual debate.

The CPD said it would move forward with an Oct. 22 debate in Nashville, Tenn., as scheduled.

Details of Amy Coney Barrett's Monday confirmation hearing released


Two U.S. senators from Indiana and a former law professor will introduce Judge Amy Coney Barrett to America on Monday as the Supreme Court nominee's high-stakes Senate confirmation hearings get underway. 

Sens. Todd Young and Michael Braun, both Republicans, and Patricia O’Hara, a former Notre Dame Law School professor, will speak at the start of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, according to new details released by the committee Friday night. 

The trio of Hoosiers will each deliver a 5-minute speech about Barrett's qualifications for the high court before Barrett -- the choice of President Trump to fill a court vacancy created by the Sept. 18 death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- is sworn in to testify.

Barrett, a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judge, will then deliver her opening remarks to the committee to cap off the first day of her confirmation hearings. 

Questioning of Barrett will start in earnest Tuesday when Senate Democrats on the committee are expected to grill her on issues related to health care, abortion and gun rights.

Barrett graduated from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. After clerking for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and working in private practice, she returned to Notre Dame in 2002 as a law school professor. Her fellow Fighting Irish faculty supported her successful 2017 nomination to the federal appeals court. 

O'Hara is a former dean of the Law School and a mentor and friend to Barrett. In an article about O'Hara's retirement, Barrett praised O'Hara's encouragement and kindness.

"Despite her many responsibilities, she visited me with gifts when my children were born and never forgets a birthday," Barrett, a mother of seven, said of her mentor. 

Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after President Donald Trump announced Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court, in the Rose Garden at the White House, Sept. 26, 2020, in Washington. (Associated Press)

Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after President Donald Trump announced Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court, in the Rose Garden at the White House, Sept. 26, 2020, in Washington. (Associated Press)

Monday's hearing will kick off an ambitious schedule set by Senate Republicans to confirm Trump's third Supreme Court pick by the Nov. 3 election. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority over 45 Democrats and two independents in the upper chamber and the GOP appears to have the votes to approve Barrett, despite Democrats' outcry that the process is illegitimate just days before Americans will decide control of the White House and Senate.

One challenge to the confirmation is the White House coronavirus outbreak that has extended to at least three GOP members of the Senate, including two members of the judiciary committee.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., will preside over the Capitol Hill hearing in person, but each senator on the committee will have the option of appearing virtually to stop the spread of the virus.

The two Republican committee members testing positive for the virus, Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Mike Lee of Utah, announced last week that they were isolating. 

Monday's hearing will kick off at 9 a.m. with an opening speech by Graham. The top Democrat on the panel, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., will follow with her remarks.

Then each of the 20 other senators on the panel will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes each. 

When all the senators are done, the introductions from Young, Braun and O'Hara will begin.

After all that, Barrett will then get her first chance to speak.

The hearings are expected to run through Thursday, with an anticipated Oct. 22 committee vote on advancing Barrett's nomination to the Senate floor.

If that timetable holds, Barrett could receive a full Senate vote by the end of October, making her the fifth woman to earn a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. 

 

Friday, October 9, 2020

October 2020 Townhall Cartoons









Karmala & Willie

 

Joni Ernst's challenger's ties to Chuck Schumer-linked PAC questioned


U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, continues to face a tough fight from her Democratic challenger, Theresa Greenfield, who raised $28.7 million in the campaign's third quarter, Greenfield’s campaign reported.

But the news came as Greenfield faced allegations that her campaign was improperly coordinating with a political action group linked to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Ernst is one of several GOP senators facing serious challenges amid the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the U.S. economy.

A Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday showed Ernst trailing Greenfield 50% to 45%, with Greenfield showing a 5% average lead in other recent polls, Real Clear Politics reported.

 Democrat Theresa Greenfield is ahead of Republican Sen. Joni Ernst 50-45 in the new Quinnipiac poll out this week. 

 Democrat Theresa Greenfield is ahead of Republican Sen. Joni Ernst 50-45 in the new Quinnipiac poll out this week.  (Greenfield for Iowa/AP)

The same Quinnipiac poll showed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden leading President Trump 50% to 45%. A slight majority of likely voters in the state say they disapprove of the president's handling of the pandemic, the poll showed, according to KCCI-TV in Des Moines. 

IOWA REPUBLICAN FILES FEC COMPLAINT OVER 'DARK MONEY' GOING TO SEN. ERNST'S DEM RIVAL

“This record-shattering haul is more proof that as Iowans begin early voting, they’re ready for change in the U.S. Senate,” Izzi Levy, a Greenfield spokesperson, said in a statement. “While Senator Ernst struggles to defend her failed record of selling out Iowans for her corporate PAC donors, Theresa’s grassroots momentum continues to grow – all without accepting a single dime from corporate PACs."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y. walks outside the Senate floor on Capitol Hill, Thursday, Oct. 1, 2020, in Washington. (Associated Press)

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y. walks outside the Senate floor on Capitol Hill, Thursday, Oct. 1, 2020, in Washington. (Associated Press)

Meanwhile, a local-level Republican politician filed a Federal Election Commission complaint against Greenfield's campaign, alleging the campaign was improperly coordinating with outside political action groups.

“There is reason to believe Greenfield, her campaign, and the IDP violated [campaign laws] by soliciting an illegal contribution from SMP [Senate Majority PAC]," said the complaint filed by Wes Enos, a Bondurant City councilman and former Polk County GOP chairman. 

Greenfield has coordinated more than $900,000 worth of communications with the Senate Majority PAC run by the allies of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the complaint alleges.

Ernst, who is seeking a second term after being elected in 2014, hasn’t released her third-quarter fundraising numbers yet.

Ernst won her 2014 race by about 8 points, 52-44, and Trump beat 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the state by 9 points, 51-42.

Ernst had $9.1 million at the end of the second quarter, The Hill reported.

 

Cory Gardner's 'Big Idea': Keep pace with China in the space race and prevent it from stealing American IP

 

Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., believes in taking special precautions to protect the United States against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). One of his proposals is to pump more money and attention into the space race to prevent China from taking hold of the final frontier in an effort to enhance its own power and harm American citizens. 

China has been criticized for various nefarious actions on the international stage in the past several years -- the biggest and most recent being its delayed response to the coronavirus outbreak and its opaque behavior with regard to the virus's possible origin. 

Gardner, who represents the swing state of Colorado and is up for reelection in November, isn't the only lawmaker or political leader to specifically criticize China's record on human rights, censorship, monetary manipulation and shakedown tactics. 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has been vocal about the Chinese government's attempts to infiltrate American schools and localities in an effort to gain communist sympathizers who would harm the country from within. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Rick Schott, R-Fla., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark.. have all been threatened by China's state-run media for speaking out against the government's actions. 

Gardner said it's vital America be vigilant with regard to aerospace technology and innovation -- as scientists, the government and private industry continue to tackle projects related to Mars, the moon, satellite technology and deep space exploration.

In your opinion, how does the United States keep pace with China with regard to the space race?

First of all – China sees U.S. space superiority as a significant threat to their attempt at domination. Economically, they certainly know it’s a threat from a national security standpoint and so they have worked hard for decades now to overcome U.S. space superiority. They’ve done that both from a standpoint of advancement and innovations within China’s space program and the military-industrial complex. But they have also done that by taking advantage of U.S. companies. Either explicitly or illicitly trying to take U.S. technologies – IP innovations – and forcing the transfer of those technologies through purchase or agreements on market access. The U.S. is basically now complicit in enabling Chinese advancements in Aerospace.

Should the U.S. be working closely with companies like SpaceX? How do they come into play here – and how deep are China’s ties in the private sector? 

China doesn’t just have ties to the private sector, they have anchors in the private sector. It is a spider web of lucrative interests that China has with U.S. space companies. That’s why we are working hard right now to stop the infiltration. If you look at China for instance – the universities – they have numerous cooperation agreements, joint partnerships with foreign universities, firms and organizations. They are leveraging their technologies and their research trying to vacuum all of that information. They are circumventing U.S. exclusionary space policy. They’re getting around it by collaborating with firms that maintain close relationships with NASA.

They are building bridges that transfer tech back to China. We know there are companies in the United States that have money flowing through them. Money flows through WeChat and Tencent, which is the same thing that’s backing TikTok. So we should at least have the same concern for our space industries as we have for TikTok.

Talk more about your plans to counterbalance the private infiltration you’re sounding the alarm about – How can the U.S. tangibly deal with this issue?

We need disclosure and we need NASA’s ability to act on it. And by disclosure I mean finding out, what does China have? What are they doing? Do they have ownership, are they investing, do they have a joint agreement? Do they have money at stake or is there some kind of cooperation? Then NASA should be able to consider those kinds of investment and venture capital arrangements when it is rewarding -- or working with – a space company. I’m not saying they can’t and I’m not saying it’s necessarily bad, but we sure as hell better know.

They’re talking about a building outer space apparatuses. They’re talking about Earth-to-space technologies – space to space technologies. Their capabilities are immense and they’re using us to defeat ourselves.

How far do you think we can get in space in our lifetime -- What are the short term goals and what is being sought after so badly, that a cold war atmosphere has once again developed between the world's superpowers?

We have to maintain our space superiority. If we do that, it will maintain economic superiority and national security with regard to satellites, space-based missions and many other aspects. The moon is going to be a launching point. It’s the space base that we have to have for every other mission beyond lunar orbit and beyond the lunar mission itself. Whether it’s mining for critical minerals on the moon or whether it’s the next phase to Mars, we can’t fall behind.

China knows that. If China can take out our communication satellites and disable our communications equipment and intel satellites, they’re sure as hell going to beat us to the moon.

What you’re discussing sounds like science fiction, like Ian Fleming’s "Moonraker." It’s more akin to the plot of a James Bond film than reality. Is there still a romantic “The Right Stuff” feeling and sense of patriotism linked with space travel and exploration -- or has China’s investment in Hollywood turned the tide?

And what do you say to those who say your ideas are outdated or just another piece of a bloated federal budget?

I love the movie “The Right Stuff” and “From the Earth to the Moon." It was an HBO series narrated by Tom Hanks. When I was growing up in the '80s you had things like “Space Camp” about turning a tilt-a-whirl amusement park ride into a spacecraft. All we wanted to do was go to space. I remember my parents describing to me that when they looked up and saw Sputnik, it was as if someone had invaded their backyard and intruded on their most intimate moments. That Russian spycraft – that Soviet spycraft – that was over their home, over their town. And the weight that they knew they needed to pull together for America, to stop the Sputnik encroachment.

Now, you’ve got China manipulating space companies and Hollywood. You can’t even show the God dawn Taiwan flag on the back of Maverick’s jersey in Top Gun. We know what they want to do. Imagine the next rocket launch that takes place without that U.S. flag painted on it. What is that saying? China’s got one hell of a PR machine, we shouldn’t be so gullible as to fall for it. We need NASA to have their eyes open as we continue to make incredibly important investments in our future exploration.

What do you think of Elon Musk?

I think he’s been one of the most innovative thinkers in the country. Let me rephrase that – he’s been one of the most innovative thinkers in the world, with his talent and capabilities. Imagine if the Wright Brothers had said, we can’t do this in the U.S. and moved out of the country. We need to make sure that the next leap that leads to the next innovation and job growth is here not somewhere else.

Do you think there will be added benefits for civilians and accidental discoveries to help the general population if more money is pumped into researching and exploring space?

Science happens and it happens sometimes where you least expect it -- and when you least expect it. If you’re not doing the science, you'll never know. Sometimes the big picture, the big idea, the main reason for the experiment isn’t even the biggest reward in the outcome. Space is one of those areas where we are a pioneering nation. Our next wave of pioneering isn’t to find more westward expansion – it’s up. It’s the heavens above. That’s where we need to go. The knowledge that it will bring, will be unparalleled in the USA and in human history.

We know what China wants to do. You can see it in Hong Kong. You can see it with their threats against Taiwan. You can see it in their militarization of the South China Sea. You can see it with the internment camps they’ve placed people in. This is not a nation that is a responsible actor.

Sen. Loeffler calls for probe into China's use of US nonprofits to meddle in election

Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., wrote to top government officials on Thursday, calling for an investigation into the use of American nonprofits by China to interfere in U.S. elections and policies — reflecting a growing concern that the communist government is seeking to meddle in the November election.

“Although publicly available assessments of the Chinese government efforts do not elaborate on how they are carrying out these efforts, it is clear that the Chinese government has experience using nongovernmental entities to execute the Chinese government’s policy goals,” Loeffler said in a letter to Attorney General William Barr, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig.

A number of officials have warned about possible election interference from China, along with other countries such as Iran and Russia. Officials have warned that China is seeking to change the policy environment, counter criticism of China and put pressure on officials who oppose the comnmunist regime.

Barr was asked last month on CNN which country was more assertive and aggressive in election meddling.

“I believe it’s China,” Barr said. “Because I’ve seen the intelligence, that’s what I’ve concluded.”

In August, the intelligence community warned that Iran is seeking to undermine President Trump and Russia working to denigrate Democratic nominee Joe Biden. Officials also said China “prefers” that Trump does not win in November.

DNI's John Ratcliffe told Fox News that China poses “a greater national security threat economically, militarily and technologically to the United States than any other nation.

“That includes threats of election influence and interference,” Ratcliffe said.

Loeffler cites reports that found the China Red Cross and other groups are tied to China and the Chinese Communist Party, as well as a New York Times article that found examples of Chinese influence campaigns in Europe and Australia.

“In the United States, laws such as the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and campaign finance restrictions on foreign donations are designed to ensure transparency and prevent foreign influence in our political processes,” Loeffler wrote. “Because nonprofit organizations receive donations from foreign individuals and entities, however, they represent a potential loophole for through which the Chinese government could influence American policies and elections.”

Loeffler asks for the IRS to conduct a review of 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) filings for Chinese connections, for a list of entities who have received Chinese money and engaged in political activity to go to the DOJ, and for the DOJ to coordinate efforts to identify and prevent Chinese efforts to meddle in the election via nonprofits.

The Trump administration has been ramping up its efforts to crack down on Chinese influence at home and abroad in recent months, particularly since the outbreak of COVID-19, which originated in China.

Among the various measures the administration has taken is a State Department move in August to designate the Confucius Institute U.S. Center (CIUS) as a Chinese foreign mission.

The statement described the CIUS, which is funded by the Chinese government, as “an entity advancing Beijing’s global propaganda and malign influence campaign on U.S. campuses and K-12 classrooms” and one that is part of its communist party apparatus. The center denied the claims and accused the administration of  “international saber rattling.”

Fox News' Brooke Singman contributed to this report.


 

CartoonDems