All for nothing? US vets who fought for Ramadi angry over fall to ISIS

Iraqi War veteran Sgt. Ben Rangel remembers fighting to secure the city of Ramadi when he first arrived in Iraq for a tour of duty in 2004. He also recalls the bloodshed.
Now, like other veterans who fought Iraqi insurgents for the capital city of Iraq's Anbar province, as well as the loved ones who died in fierce battles there, Rangel bristles at the sight of the ISIS flag-waving above the government complex. Many are wondering why their hard-fought gains were so easily surrendered when Iraqi forces, following the U.S. pullout, were unable to stand up to the black-clad terrorist army.

“It’s hard to watch and then be told that it’s all part of a successful plan.”
- Pete Hegseth,Concerned Veterans for America

“We lost a lot of men,” Rangel, a former infantryman with the 2^nd battalion/5^th Marines Fox Company, told FoxNews.com. “The fighting in Fallujah got a lot of attention in the news, but Ramadi was a very important city because of the supply route that ran through it to Baghdad.
“We were fighting non-stop for three months," he said. "Our mission was always to make sure that the supply route was secure.”
Ramadi, once a city of 750,000, lies some 70 miles west of Baghdad in the Sunni-majority province. During the Iraq War, which raged from 2003 to late 2011, nearly 5,000 coalition forces were killed and more than 32,000 wounded. Some of the war's fiercest fighting occurred in Anbar province, including in Falluja and Ramadi.
Rangel’s battalion lost 23 men during the fighting, and the veteran lost a close friend when that man's unit struck an IED along "Route Michigan," the military's name for the supply road that leads from Baghdad into Syria, passing through Fallujah and Ramadi.
“I never got to see him again,” the Marine recalled.
Despite the hardships and loss of men, over the next few years, Ramadi was eventually secured.
“All that fighting had paid off,” Rangel said, adding that the city was completely out of the clutches of the insurgency when he went back with his unit in 2007, a year after the infamous Battle of Ramadi in 2006, to train Iraqi police forces.
Nearly a decade after Rangel and others fought to free Ramadi, the city is poised to become a bloody battleground yet again. Iraqi troops, driven out by a much smaller ISIS army over the weekend, are poised to mount a counter-offensive, aided by a coalition of Shia Muslim fighters. But the failure by Iraqi forces to hold the city has already led to a humanitarian crisis, as an estimated 25,000 Iraqi refugees have fled for safety, most of them heading along Route Michigan for Baghdad.

Related Image

Expand / Contract

Sgt. Ben Rangel, seen here in a a photo taken in the City of Ramadi in 2004, said the fighting was "non-stop" against the insurgency at the time.

“It’s gut-wrenching and disgusting to me that we choose to stand by and do nothing,” Debbie Lee, whose son Marc Alan Lee was the first Navy SEAL to be killed in the Operation Iraqi Freedom while fighting insurgents in Ramadi, told FoxNews.com. “Our troops are more than capable to secure that city and they are just not given the ability.
“It’s because they [Washington] refuse to send troops that we are seeing this insurgence,” she added.
The U.S. has been coordinating airstrikes since last August, pounding ISIS positions in both Iraq and Syria. But the Obama administration has said it does not want troops back on the ground in Iraq, and has said it is up to the Iraqis to defend their land from the terrorist army. Weapons the U.S. gave to the Iraqis, including tanks, have fallen into the hands of ISIS when the Iraqi forces fled, first in Mosul last year and now, most recently, in Ramadi.
Sgt. Rangel, whose unit helped train Iraqi forces in 2007, said he never had a lot of confidence in them,.
"At one point we had to take over for the Iraqi police because many of them were helping insurgents,” he said. “It was very difficult to know who the enemy was. One minute, they [insurgents] would be in civilian clothes, the next they were picking up rifles and attacking us.
A senior military official confirmed to Fox News Channel on Wednesday that the Obama administration is looking into arming Sunni tribes to help national forces and Shia militia retake Ramadi. However, public comments from another Pentagon official suggest that not much more assistance will be provided.
“We are confident that we have the right strategy at this time,” U.S. Central Command spokesman, Col. Patrick Ryder, U.S. Air Force said Wednesday. “Momentum will continue to be on our side.”

Related Image

Expand / Contract

Sgt. Rangel, served with the the Marine Corps' Fox Company and returned in 2007, after Ramadi was secured, to help train Iraqi police forces.

Pete Hegseth, CEO of Concerned Veterans for America and a Fox News contributor, said veterans who fought and bled to free Ramadi from insurgents a decade ago have little reason for confidence in the current effort.
“It’s hard to watch and then be told that it’s all part of a successful plan,” Hegseth said. “Ramadi was a model success story and we continue to see all of the gains we made there be somewhat reversed.
"It’s a slap in the faces of families of soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice,” he added.

US warns China not to challenge military flights over South China Sea

The U.S. warned China Thursday against confronting U.S. aerial patrols over the South China Sea days after a verbal dispute between a Chinese military dispatcher and a U.S. Navy surveillance aircraft. 
The Los Angeles Times reported that the Navy released two videos and an audio recording of the confrontation, which took place on Wednesday when the Chinese dispatcher demanded eight times that the Navy P8-A Poseidon leave the area as it flew over Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratly Island chain, where China has conducted extensive reclamation work.
"Foreign military aircraft, this is Chinese navy. You are approaching our military alert zone. Leave immediately," the dispatcher said on the recording. After the American crew responded that it was flying over international waters, the Chinese dispatcher responded "This is the Chinese navy ... You go!"
The incident was the latest example of friction between Washington and Beijing, with China seeking to assert its expansive claims to the South China Sea and the U.S. pushing back and attempting  to demonstrate that China's massive land reclamation does not give it territorial rights.
Daniel Russel, the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia, said the flight of a U.S. reconnaissance plane in international airspace over the South China Sea was a regular and appropriate occurrence. He said the U.S. will seek to preserve the ability of not just the United States but all countries to exercise their rights to freedom of navigation and overflight.
"Nobody in their right mind is going to try to stop the U.S. Navy from operating. That would not be a good step. But it's not enough that a U.S. military plane can overfly international waters, even if there is a challenge or a hail and query" from the Chinese military, he said.
"We believe that every country and all civilian actors also should have unfettered access to international waters and international airspace," he said.
Speaking at a regular daily briefing Thursday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei reiterated Beijing's insistence on its indisputable sovereignty over the islands it has created by piling sand on top of atolls and reefs.
While saying he had no information about the reported exchange, Hong said China was "entitled to the surveillance over related airspace and sea areas so as to maintain national security and avoid any maritime accidents.
"We hope relevant countries respect China's sovereignty over the South China Sea, abandon actions that may intensify controversies and play a constructive role for regional peace and stability," Hong told reporters.
China claims virtually the entire South China Sea as its own, along with its scattered island groups. The area that is home to some of the world's busiest commercial shipping routes is also claimed in part or in whole by the Philippines, Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam.
The U.S. and most of the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) want a halt to the projects, which they suspect are aimed at building islands and other land features over which China can claim sovereignty and base military assets.
The U.S. says it takes no position on the sovereignty claims but insists they must be negotiated. Washington also says ensuring maritime safety and access is a U.S. national security priority.
China is also at odds with Japan over ownership of a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea that are controlled by Tokyo but also claimed by Beijing, leading to increased activity by Chinese planes and ships in the area, which lies between Taiwan and Okinawa.
Both sides have accused the other of operating dangerously, prompting fears of an incident such as the 2001 collision between a Chinese fighter jet and a U.S. surveillance plane in which the Chinese pilot was killed and the American crew detained on China's Hainan island.
Also Thursday, the Chinese air force announced its latest offshore training exercises in the western Pacific as part of efforts to boost its combat preparedness.
People's Liberation Army Air Force spokesman Shen Jinke said the exercises were held in international airspace but gave no specifics. In its report on the drills, state broadcaster CCTV showed a video of Xian H-6 twin-engine bombers, a Chinese version of Russia's Tupelov Tu-16, in flight and landing at an air base, although it wasn't clear when the video was shot.

Clinton Foundation reveals up to $26.4M in previously undisclosed payments

The Clinton Foundation acknowledged Thursday that it had received millions of dollars in payments that had not previously been disclosed under a 2008 ethics agreement with the Obama administration. 
The Washington Post, citing foundation officials, reported that the payments were categorized internally as "revenue" instead of donations, which exempted the organization from including them in its public list of contributions.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, has faced questions about whether the foundation fully complied with the agreement it made with the Obama administration when Clinton was nominated to be America's top diplomat. Questions have also been raised about whether the foundation's lengthy list of donors tied to foreign governments presented a conflict of interest for Clinton while she was Secretary of State or whether such conflicts might arise should she become president.
According to the Post, the previously undisclosed money was paid in the form of speaking fees for Hillary and former President Bill Clinton, as well as their daughter Chelsea. The foundation does not say how much the Clintons were paid for each speech, only giving a range. The total amount in new payments is between $12 million and $26.4 million.
According to new information released by the foundation, the Clintons have made a total of 97 speeches to benefit the foundation since 2002. Those speeches have been sponsored by a number of institutions, including colleges and universities, corporations, and at least one foreign government, Thailand.
The Post reports that the organizations that paid to hear Hillary Clinton speak to them include large financial institutions Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase. Another organization, founded by Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, paid between $250,000 and $500,000 to hear the former Secretary of State. In all, 15 speeches by Hillary Clinton were newly disclosed by the foundation, which did not provide any dates for the events.
Former President Bill Clinton gave 73 of the 97 newly disclosed speeches, including the speech paid for by Thailand's Energy Ministry, which contributed between $250,000 and $500,000.  Other organizations addressed by Bill Clinton include the U.S. Islamic World Forum (between $250,000 and $500,000 contributed), a South Korean energy and chemical company ( between $500,00 and $1 million), the China Real Estate Development Corp., and the Qatar First Investment Bank (both paying between $250,000 and $500,000).

Funny but not Really Cartoon

‘What the hell?’ Boehner rips VA for firing almost nobody, year after Shinseki resignation

House Speaker John Boehner tore into Veterans Affairs leadership Wednesday, alleging that nearly a year after then-Secretary Eric Shinseki resigned amid the scandal over veterans care, his successors have done little to fix the agency -- or even discipline those involved in the wait-times crisis.
"Just one person has been fired. One," Boehner said in a scathing House floor speech. "What the hell happened to the rest of them? "
He appealed for the agency to take care of America's veterans as well as they take care "of the bureaucrats."
Boehner, R-Ohio, said he is especially frustrated that so few VA officials have been fired, despite evidence that at least 110 VA facilities kept secret lists to manipulate and hide long wait-times.
In February, VA Secretary Robert McDonald claimed in a TV interview that the department had "fired" 60 people connected with the scandal.
That estimate was later revised down to 14. But The New York Times reported in late April that, according to documents given to Congress, only one person had actually been fired -- Phoenix VA hospital director Sharon Helman. Another retired under pressure and another's "termination" was pending. Several others were disciplined in other ways.
Boehner likened some of the punishments to a "slap on the wrist," noting some got transfers and others got paid leave. And "all of them went on collecting checks from taxpayers," he said.
Further, Boehner said, the number of patients facing long waits is about the same as it was last year, while the number of patients waiting more than 90 days has nearly doubled.
The VA's problems are so deep that -- despite a new law that overhauled the agency and authorized $16 billion in new spending over three years -- it can't even build a hospital, Boehner said, referring to a half-finished project in Denver that is $1 billion over budget.
Boehner said more legislation to hold the VA accountable is likely.
"But only the administration can change the culture from within," he said.
As Memorial Day approaches, President Obama "owes the American people a real, long-term plan to fix the VA," Boehner said. "Not a promise or a pledge or a rearranging of deck chairs: a real plan to clean up this mess."
A VA representative has not yet responded to a request for comment on Boehner's allegations.

Fox News, Facebook to host first GOP primary debate of 2016 race

Fox News and Facebook will host the first Republican primary debate of the 2016 presidential race on Aug. 6 in Ohio, the network announced Wednesday.
The debate, to be presented in conjunction with the Ohio Republican Party, will be held at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland.
The announcement comes as the Republican field is still taking shape. Six primary candidates have formally declared their intention to seek the nomination -- but several more are expected to declare in the coming weeks, contributing to one of the largest-ever GOP primary fields.
The Aug. 6 debate will be moderated by Fox News' Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace.
The format will allow Fox News viewers and Facebook users to share video questions via the social media site, some of which will be used for the debate, the network said.
Fox News' Executive Vice President of News Editorial Michael Clemente also announced the criteria for candidates:
They must meet all constitutional requirements; must announce and register a formal campaign; must file all required paperwork with the Federal Election Commission; and must place in the top 10 in an average of the five most recent, recognized national polls leading up to Aug. 4.
Those who do not place in the top 10 will be provided additional coverage and air time, Clemente said in a statement.
The debate will be presented live from 9-11 p.m. ET, on Fox News Channel, with additional coverage on Fox News Radio, Fox News Mobile and FoxNews.com.
Andy Mitchell, director of News and Global Media Partnerships at Facebook, said, "Facebook's scale and foundation in real identity give Fox News and the Republican contenders for the nomination the opportunity to open up the debate to Americans in a new and unique way."
Ohio GOP Chairman Matt Borges reiterated the crucial role his state is playing this cycle in both the primary process and general election -- as the site of the 2016 Republican National Convention, and a crucial swing state.
"A Republican can't win the White House without carrying our state, so there's no better place to host the first primary debate," he said.

‘They will pay off’: Employers, advocates help returning vets face next battle -- landing a job

For many veterans coming home after multiple tours over 14 years of war, getting a job in the civilian world has been their most personal battle yet, marked by disappointments and dead ends.
But, thanks to a slowly improving job market and active efforts by veterans' groups, officials and recruiters in private-sector companies, that dim outlook is beginning to brighten.
Though still higher than the national average, the unemployment rate among recent veterans has steadily declined. Veterans' advocates say, perhaps most importantly, the mindset in corporate America is starting to change.
It boils down to this: Seeing that hiring a veteran is not just a good deed. It can be a smart hire.
"I think there is a commitment by the corporate community and associations and groups like ours that are trying to make people understand ... We make it a point that veterans should be viewed as an investment, not as a charity," said Mark Szymanski, a spokesman with the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of American (IAVA).
This is only the start. Tens of thousands of returning veterans are still looking for work. And the mission of IAVA -- founded in 2004 to help returning vets reintegrate into the workforce -- and similar groups has become only more critical as the Iraq war ended (despite the subsequent return of U.S. forces to combat ISIS) and the U.S. combat mission in Afghanistan drew to a close.

More on this...

• Walmart Boosts Hiring of Veterans

The progress, though, can be charted. At its peak, joblessness for those serving since 9/11 (which labor statisticians refer to as Gulf War-era II vets) was nearly 12 percent in 2011. In January, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that number had fallen steadily to 7.2 percent in 2014. On a monthly basis, the latest BLS figures show that among all post-9/11 veterans, the number was 6.9 percent for April, up slightly from 6.5 percent in March.
First lady Michelle Obama, speaking in April on behalf of the four-year-old Joining Forces White House initiative to support vets and their families, credited employers across the country who she said heeded "the call."
"[These] companies were seeing for themselves that hiring our military members and our spouses wasn't simply the patriotic thing to do, it was the right thing to do for their bottom line," she said.
The first lady said that businesses have hired or trained more than 850,000 veterans and military spouses, which she called an "outstanding" number.
Their unemployment rate is still higher than the national one, which was pegged at 5.4 percent for April, and 6.7 percent at the end of 2014. According to recruitment officials who spoke with FoxNews.com, there are several factors at play. Aside from fierce competition in the job markets, many vets don't know where and how to get assistance in finding the right job. All of their contacts are inside the military, and largely unhelpful for networking. Some don't know what to do after years of being told what to do.
Finally, employers themselves don't always understand the value veterans could bring to their workplace.
Many are trying to change that. Since 2011, Verizon has had an active veterans' advisory panel and a robust recruiting program that also includes job-seeking assistance offered at job fairs across the country, and virtual workshops, according to Evan Guzman, the head of Military Programs & Veteran Affairs at Verizon's corporate offices in New Jersey.
"It really started out as a campaign of winning hearts and minds [of the internal organization]," convincing executives that hiring vets was a win-win for everyone, Guzman said. Verizon has hired 3,000 post-9/11 vets since 2013.
Aside from its own efforts, Verizon is also part of the Veterans Employment Initiative at the Northern Virginia Technology Council (NVTC), which brings together greater Washington, D.C. firms, many of them defense and technology contractors, to recruit and mentor vets through transition.
This includes resume building, interviewing and, of course, networking. "It's one thing to leave the military with a resume," said Guzman, "but if you can't network, you're going to find yourself stuck."

Related Image

Expand / Contract

Shown here is a veterans recruitment event sponsored by the Northern Virginia Technology Council. (Courtesy of NVTC)

NVTC's member companies told FoxNews.com that they have tens of thousands of applications coming into them every week (there are currently 198,000 veterans' resumes on file at NVTC's website). NVTC has worked with 368 vets directly for transition and placement, and provided one-on-one mentors for 78.
"There is a lot of outreach going on," said Gabe Galvan, the Veterans Affairs portfolio director for the MITRE Corporation, a nonprofit organization that operates research and development centers for the federal government. Some 20 percent of its workforce are veterans, including severely disabled. "We have a supply of people leaning in who can deliver these structures of support to the veterans," he said. They also have also designed a "boot camp" to get other employers on board.
Eric Bartch, who runs the veterans outreach program at CACI, a major federal defense contractor based in Northern Virginia, says its important that the employers are providing a pipeline for vets, and veterans seek that connection out. Otherwise, they are sending resumes blindly to companies, which might as well be a black hole. CACI gets over 1,400 veteran applications a week, and over 5,000 a month, he said. Right now its workforce is 30 percent veteran, and of that number, 7 percent are disabled.
"There is just so much competition," Bartch said. "[Veterans] really need to have someone inside the company to be their advocate, look for those military support teams that most companies have now -- reach out to them first." He said CACI is part of a healthy network of companies in the area, along with Joining Forces and other groups, providing a bridge. Veterans that are in demand include those with IT, cybersecurity, security, logistics and litigation skills.
But outside the Beltway, the job market is not as flush with federal contracts, and not every company has a small army of people working solely in veterans outreach. The economy is still struggling, especially in America's small towns and rural areas.
"The gap is closing but the economy is still sluggish. The companies, in many cases, don't have the openings," said Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pa., who as chairman of the Oversight & Investigations subcommittee has been at the forefront of probes into the rash of scandals at the nation's VA health care facilities.
"In Kentucky and West Virginia, coal companies are closing down. This is hurting people because they can't come home and work. A lot of your grunts come from small towns, they hope to make a new life for themselves and then come home to find their town just isn't hiring," he told FoxNews.com.
Many of the young vets coming home from war have a double strike by being out of the civilian workforce for years -- if they ever were in it. Young infantrymen and women for example, don't know what their battlefield skills are good for. Then there is prejudice.
"People are still concerned about hiring a vet with a disability and mistake a disability for inability, though I think some of those concerns of five or six years ago have gone down. But it has been difficult for employers to understand," Murphy said.
Veterans offer "safety, teamwork, loyalty and knowing how to get the job done," he told FoxNews.com. "I just met a former general in charge of hiring for a company who said he is hiring veterans because they can read maps. You just can't train someone on the assets the military builds into you."
This is where groups like IAVA come in. They work with employers to make sure they are not just in "reactionary" mode, hiring vets to plug gaps in low-wage paying jobs, or because they feel compelled to. They also want to take that "grunt" and help him or her sell themselves to the employer.
Matt Ross, project manager for the employment programs at IAVA, is planning the group's May 18 Career Boot Camp in New York City. He recalls one of his own early interviews when transitioning out of the military. "I told [the interviewer] I was a rifleman," he recalled.
After she asked what that meant, "I drew a blank, I hadn't prepared for that. I could have said, it meant accountability for equipment, [and experience in] logistical and operational planning."
It's that type of prep work the Boot Camp hopes to offer.
Employers will be there, too. "We're not out there begging for jobs, or to give people a break," said Szymanski. "We're saying, invest in a veteran, invest in their programs, because they will pay off and our country will be better."

ISIS controls 50 percent of Syria after takeover of Palmyra, monitoring group says

The Islamic State terror group controls over half of Syrian territory after seizing the village and archaeological site of Palmyra in the central part of the country Thursday, activists monitoring Syria's civil war said.
Rami Abdurrahman of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told the Associated Press the extremists overran the archaeological site, just to the southwest of the modern settlement on Palmyra, shortly after midnight local time.
An activist in the central province of Homs who goes by the name of Bebars al-Talawy also says that Islamic State, commonly known as ISIS, now controls the ruins at the UNESCO world heritage site famous for its 2,000-year-old towering Roman-era colonnades and other ruins and priceless artifacts. Before the war, thousands of tourists a year visited the remote desert outpost, a cherished landmark referred to by Syrians as the "Bride of the Desert."
Both activists said Thursday that ISIS had not damaged the ruins so far. ISIS has previously destroyed major archaeological sites in Iraq that predate the founding of Islam. Sky News reported that hundreds of statues and artifacts had been taken to safety ahead of the ISIS advance, but larger items, such as stone tombs, could not be removed in time. 
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that ISIS had also seized control of Palmyra's military air base, prison and intelligence headquarters. The Associated Press reported that the prison, known as Tadmur, is where thousands of Syrian dissidents have been imprisoned and tortured over the years.
An amateur video posted online showed ISIS fighters, allegedly inside the prison, burning a giant poster of Syrian President Bashar Assad and cheering as flames rose around them against the night sky. The video and its location could not be independently verified, but appeared genuine and corresponded to other AP reporting of the events.