Hillary Clinton and her supporters are blistering the
Benghazi committee ahead of her much-anticipated testimony Thursday,
repeatedly questioning the GOP-led investigative panel’s “credibility”
as the former secretary of state gears up for a potentially
confrontational appearance.
On Wednesday, a super PAC supporting Clinton’s Democratic
presidential campaign, Priorities USA, will begin running TV ads aimed
at bolstering her image ahead of her appearance before the House Select
Committee on Benghazi.
The effort marks the group’s first TV ad buy of the election cycle.
But it is also just part of an all-out offensive that unexpectedly
started Sept. 29 when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested the
committee -- created to investigate the 2012 terror attacks in
Benghazi, Libya -- has hurt Clinton’s poll numbers. Within days, New
York Republican Rep. Richard Hanna and a GOP committee investigator also
suggested the committee was too focused on Clinton, giving her and
campaign officials an opening to call the panel a partisan tool.
“This committee is basically an arm of the Republican National
Committee,” Clinton said to applause during last week’s Democratic
primary debate. “It is a partisan vehicle, as admitted by … Mr.
McCarthy, to drive down my poll numbers.” A few days earlier, Clinton
told NBC the committee was “set up … for the purpose of making a
partisan, political issue out of the deaths of four Americans.”
It's an allegation that Republican committee Chairman Trey Gowdy has
adamantly denied, telling his Democratic committee counterpart as
recently as Sunday that the committee "is not investigating Secretary
Clinton" or the allegations surrounding her personal email use.
Whether the pre-hearing charges will lead to fireworks Thursday
remains to be seen. Gowdy appears to be at pains to show his committee
is only interested in getting at the truth regarding the Benghazi
attacks, while Clinton publicly casts the panel as a partisan outfit.
Clinton showed visible frustration during her 2013 Benghazi-related
appearance on Capitol Hill, where she asked "what difference, at this
point, does it make" what motivated the attackers. The Democratic
presidential front-runner surely is mindful that such an unguarded
moment on Thursday could become fodder for GOP ads in the 2016 cycle.
The committee itself was formed last year to investigate the Sept.
11, 2012, attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other
Americans at the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, while Clinton was
secretary of state.
The 12-member bipartisan committee discovered this March that Clinton
used a private server and email accounts for official business while in
office, which has led to an FBI investigation, several other
congressional probes and widespread concerns about whether her unusual
setup resulted in national security breaches.
Still, Gowdy says the committee is focused on Benghazi. He and
Republican committee member Rep. Mike Pompeo, of Kansas, indicated
Sunday they have no intentions of closing the investigation and in fact
have dozens more witnesses and more information, including new Stevens’
emails.
“The ambassador asked for more security, and it was ignored,” Bradley
Blakemen, former deputy assistant to President George W. Bush, said
Tuesday.
However, Clinton supporters and others have called for shuttering the
17-month-old committee -- arguing it’s a political sham and a $4.5
million taxpayer waste.
“If you want to get to the truth, you might want to broaden your
reach as opposed to … for political reasons, just going after Hillary
Clinton,” Democratic strategist David Mercer told FoxNews.com on
Tuesday.
Critics have more recently noted that Republican committee members
recently summoned long-time Clinton aide-de-camp Huma Abedin to testify
while thus far not doing the same for then-Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta, then-CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus and others.
Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon told reporters last week that
Clinton would still testify but that Gowdy’s inquiry now has “zero
credibility left.”
The counter-attacks have more recently focused on Gowdy. The
Washington Post last week found an alleged connection between him and
the STOP Hillary PAC that ran a controversial Benghazi ad during the
Democratic debate, resulting in Gowdy returning $2,000 in contributions.
The South Carolina Republican and former state and federal prosecutor
recently told Politico that the past few weeks have been among “the
worst in my life.” In response to Republican non-committee members
critiquing their work, he said over the weekend that they should “shut
up.”
The hearing Thursday is expected focus in large part on whether
Clinton, who in 2013 testified before Congress on Benghazi, adequately
responded to concerns by Stevens about security at the Benghazi
outpost.
Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign has produced several videos ahead of
Thursday’s hearing including a five-minute highlight reel that touts
Clinton’s "smart leadership” as secretary of state.