EXCLUSIVE – The
claim that the fatal 2012 Benghazi terrorist attacks were sparked by an
anti-Muslim video was crafted in Washington by Obama administration
appointees and reflected neither eyewitness nor real-time reports from
the Americans under siege, according to the final report of the GOP-led
Benghazi Select Committee.
The GOP report, released Tuesday, followed by less
than a day a report by the Democrats on the panel saying that security
at the Benghazi, Libya facility was “woefully inadequate” but former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never personally denied any requests
from diplomats for additional protection.
According to portions of the Republican report
reviewed by Fox News, one U.S. agent at the American outpost in
Benghazi, whose name was withheld for security reasons, told the
committee he first heard “some kind of chanting.”
Then that sound was immediately followed by
“explosions” and “gunfire, then roughly 70 people rushing into the
compound with an assortment of “AK-47s, grenades, RPG’s … a couple of
different assault rifles,” the agent said.
In addition, a senior watch officer at the State
Department's diplomatic security command described the Sept. 11, 2012,
strikes as "a full on attack against our compound.”
When asked whether he saw or heard a protest prior to
the attacks, the officer replied, "zip, nothing, nada," according to
the Republican majority report.
“None of the information coming directly from the
agents on the ground in Benghazi during the attacks mentioned anything
about a video or a protest. The firsthand accounts made their way to the
office of the Secretary through multiple channels quickly …,” the
report concluded.
U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other
Americans, foreign service officer Sean Smith and former Navy Seals Ty
Woods and Glen Doherty, were killed in the attacks.
Five days later, then-United Nations Ambassador Susan
Rice went on every national Sunday talk show. She told Fox News Sunday,
“What sparked the recent violence was the airing on the Internet of a
very hateful, very offensive video that has offended many people around
the world.”
The GOP committee report also identified for the
first time a White House meeting that was convened roughly three hours
into the attack and included deputies to senior Cabinet members and
Clinton.
Stevens was missing at the time. But the report found
“much of the conversation focused on the video (which) is surprising
given no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in
Benghazi and the video at the time ….”
The report found that “five of the 10 action items from the rough notes of the 7:30pm meeting reference the video.”
Unlike the Usama bin Laden raid in 2011, in which
Clinton, President Obama and his national security team watched events
unfold from the Situation Room, they never gathered for Benghazi.
Clinton issued the only statement that night from the
administration, following the White House meeting. It read in part:
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to
inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”
However, Clinton said something very different privately.
In an email provided to the Select Committee, Clinton
told daughter Chelsea, “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by
an Al Queda-like [sic] group.”
Clinton also told Egypt’s prime minister the
following day: “We know that the attacks in Libya had nothing to do with
the film. It was a planned attack -- not a protest.”
Kansas GOP Rep. Mike Pompeo, a Benghazi committee
member, told Fox News in advance of the report’s release that the report
is new and significant because it’s the first to include interviews
from “everybody on the ground” in Benghazi.
More than 30 people’s lives were at risk that night, and the majority worked at the secret CIA annex in Benghazi.
Pompeo also said the findings show “it’s unambiguous
the administration knew immediately it was a terror attack. And the
story of fog of war was known to be false immediately by everyone in the
administration.”
Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee, has seen her campaign plagued by questions about whether she
and the rest of the State Department provided adequate security for
Americans before the attacks and about why the administration continued
to tell Americans the attacks were inspired by the video.
Committee Republicans say the deputies’ meeting, in
which Clinton was involved, on the night of the Benghazi attack shows
she’s not ready for the so-called “3 a.m. call.”
The report interviewed more than 80 witnesses previously not called before Congress to testify.
Among them was Ben Rhodes, the president’s deputy
national security adviser for strategic communications, who with
political adviser David Plouffe prepped Rice for her national TV
appearances claiming the video was responsible for the terrorist attack.
Rice said her statements were based on the best
available information, but nobody from the intelligence community such
as the CIA director or the Director of National Intelligence briefed
Rice. That was done by the political appointees.
In fact, a Sept. 14, 2012 memo from Rhodes included the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET."
The email was sent to a dozen members of the
administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House
communications team such as then-Press Secretary Jay Carney, who also
pushed the video narrative in the days after the attacks.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to
the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the
Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere, including one day
earlier in Cairo.
The Rhodes email, which was a catalyst for the Select
Committee, was first obtained by Judicial Watch through a federal court
lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act.
The email lists the following two goals, among
others: "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet
video and not a broader failure of policy” and “to reinforce the
President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with
difficult challenges."
Rhodes was the same official who signed off on Clinton’s statement the night of the attack linking the video to Benghazi.
The report found the post attack intelligence
analysis had errors, contradicting the eyewitness accounts that night,
and it alleges the administration latched onto the faulty analysis to
defend and justify their misleading statements to the public.
There were in fact two sets of talking points – the
White House version by Rhodes and the one by the CIA. When editing the
CIA's version, Deputy Director Michael Morell knew his personnel on the
ground disputed the protest analysis, but he gave the final say to
his analysts in Washington, thousands of miles away.