Sunday, October 30, 2016

John Fund: If Hillary wins, we’ll have a potential blackmail target in the White House


“This is just a distraction,” Democratic pollster Mark Mellman says of the news the FBI is reexamining the Clinton email case.
During a press conference — which lasted all of three minutes — Hillary Clinton herself said, “I think people a long time ago made up their minds about the emails. I think that’s factored into that people think and now they’re choosing a president.”
 But for people in the intelligence community -- including disgruntled FBI agents and even former officials in the Pentagon, it’s not that easy.
The revival of the Clinton email scandal reminds them of just how exposed Clinton left highly classified information.
Last September, an FBI report noted the bureau couldn’t find proof her private email server was hacked into by adversaries. But it noted that the private server had to be shut down repeatedly because of hacker attacks and a successful attack wasn’t likely to have left fingerprints.  Also, some "hostile foreign actors" were able to break into the personal email accounts of Clinton’s close aides, obtaining a treasure trove of emails exchanged with her personal account.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
Note that so far none of the WikiLeaks revelations have come from Hillary’s personal account. That could mean it wasn’t hacked, or it could mean that “hostile” actors are waiting to make use of them.
Given the growing suspicions that the Clinton Foundation may have exchanged favors with the Clinton State Department, her private server could be of great interest in establishing such links.
In short, we have to acknowledge the danger that Hillary Clinton could be the target of international blackmail in the White House.
Consider what happened the first time the Clinton couple was there. Bill Clinton’s involvement with the intern Monica Lewinsky had national security implications and also subjected him to possible blackmail.
Secret Service agent Gary Bryne reported in his book ‘Crisis of Character” that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded that Russia, the U.K. and Israel had intercepted phone calls between Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.
In 2000, Insight magazine, after a one-year investigation by a team of reporters, claimed that the Israeli government had “penetrated four White House telephone lines and was able to relay real-time conversations on those lines from a remote site outside the White House directly to Israel for listening and recording.”
Boris Yeltsin, the former Russian president, wrote in his memoirs that Russian intelligence had picked up on Clinton’s “predilection for beautiful young women.”
From agreeing to talk with the insecure Lewinsky on short notice to making sure she had a job to her liking at the Pentagon (with a security clearance!) President Clinton did a great deal to keep Lewinsky quiet. Nonetheless, she ended up discussing her affair with 11 people. One of those was Linda Tripp, a Pentagon official who recorded their talks. But what if Tripp or someone else had taken those tapes to Chinese or Iranian diplomats instead of Kenneth Starr, the special prosecutor?
Indeed, in his book “Clinton, Inc.,” journalist Daniel Halper reports that there was a blackmail attempt against Bill Clinton.
In October 1998 in a bid to gain the release of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard, an Israeli team led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to blackmail President Clinton with tapes of Clinton and Lewinsky.
When Clinton brought Israel’s request for Pollard’s release to CIA Director George Tenet, Tenet threatened to resign on the spot should Clinton cave and release Pollard. Clinton ultimately declined the Israeli request, though he would consider it once again before the end of his term.
In fact, Clinton was all too aware of  the security risk the Lewinsky relationship represented. The Starr Report, released in September 1998, reveals that Clinton told Lewinsky that "he suspected that a foreign embassy was tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover stories" if they were ever questioned about their relationship.
The president and Lewinsky had "phone sex" 10 to 15 times, so Clinton told Lewinsky that, if asked, she should say "they knew their calls were being monitored all along, and the phone sex was just a put-on." This laughable "explanation" wouldn't have helped much if a foreign power had intercepted the explicit calls.
"I'm just horrified to think the commander-in-chief is conducting himself with such reckless disregard for his responsibilities, making himself part and parcel of every blackmail threat that one can imagine," retired Marine Lt. Gen. Charles Cooper told the Washington Times in 1998.
The Code of Federal Regulations (Title 32, Chapter 1, Part 147) makes clear that a person may lose a security clearance for "concealment of information that may increase an individual's vulnerability to coercion, exploitation, or duress, such as engaging in activities which, if known, may affect the person's personal, professional, or community standing or render the person susceptible to blackmail.”
Presidents have enforced such laws by issuing edicts such as Executive Order No. 12968 in August 1995. It states that individuals eligible for access to classified material must have a record of "strength of character, trustworthiness, honesty, reliability, discretion, and sound judgment, as well as freedom from conflicting allegiances and potential for coercion." It was signed by President Clinton. Three months later he began a relationship with an intern named Monica Lewinsky
The American people will have to decide if, after 20 years, the Clintons have really changed the way they operate and can be trusted to retake control of the Oval Office.

Lynch, Justice opposed Comey's Clinton email letter; Democrats in Senate demand answers


Four Democrats in the Senate on Saturday sent a letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey requesting a range of disclosures in the wake of Comey's Friday announcement about newly discovered emails possibly pertaining to Hillary Clinton's use of a private server.
The letter asks for "more detailed information about the investigative steps being taken, the number of emails involved, and what is being done to determine how many of the emails are duplicative of those already reviewed."
Sen. Patrick Leahy, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Benjamin Cardin and Sen. Thomas Carper signed the letter and gave Comey and Lynch a deadline of Monday to respond.
Calling Comey's letter from Friday "troubling," and noting that they are aware of the warning given by the Justice Department to the FBI regarding Comey's actions on Friday, the senators also write that his letter to Congressional Republicans breaks with the longstanding tradition of the FBI and Department of Justice proceeding cautiously in the days leading up to an election.
"Director Comey's letter has been misunderstood. It is already being used for political purposes, creating a misleading impression regarding the FBI's intent and actions," the senators wrote, calling on federal officials to dispel any misleading impressions and clarify what significance any of the new emails have to the previous investigation of Sec. Clinton.
The Justice Department advised Comey against telling Congress about newly discovered emails possibly "pertinent” to the agency’s investigation into Clinton’s server, with GOP rival Donald Trump on Saturday suggesting a cover-up.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
“That’s because the Justice Department is trying so hard to protect Hillary,” Trump said at a rally in battleground Colorado. “This is what we mean when we call it a rigged system. … She is so guilty.”
Comey said in a letter that was made public Friday that the FBI discovered the emails while pursuing a case related to the husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin -- disgraced former New York Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner, who was allegedly sexting a 15-year-old girl on a laptop he shared with his wife.
A government source confirmed Saturday to Fox News that the Justice Department concluded the letter to Congress would be inconsistent with agency policy against investigations that could impact an election or help a particular candidate.
Comey purportedly made the decision to send the letter to Capitol Hill committee leaders independently of the Justice Department.
The FBI this summer concluded its rough 2-year-long investigation into Clinton’s use of a private server while secretary of state.
Comey said at the time that some of the emails contained classified information and that Clinton was “extremely careless” in her actions. However, the agency didn’t find enough evidence to recommend criminal charges to the Justice Department.
Clinton, who in most major polls leads Trump by about 5 percentage points, on Saturday repeated her call for Comey to provide more details, saying “explain everything right away, put it all out on the table.”
“If you're like me, you probably have a few questions about it,” Clinton said at a rally in Daytona Beach, Florida. “It is pretty strange to put something like that out with such little information right before an election. In fact, it's not just strange, it's unprecedented and deeply troubling because voters deserve to get full and complete facts.”
She also accused Trump of “making up lies” about the issue and “doing his best to confuse, mislead and discourage the American people.”
Late Friday in Iowa, Clinton called on Comey to release the "full and complete facts" about the FBI review. In a speech Friday in Daytona Beach, Floriday, Clinton called Comey's release of the letter "unprecedented" and repeated her demand for more specifics.
On a conference call Saturday with reporters, Clinton campaign officials said the FBI has given no indication that the cache of recently discovered emails are even about the candidate
Campaign chairman John Podesta said Comey's information is "long on innuendo" and "short on facts." He also said there's "no evidence of wrongdoing. No charge of wrongdoing. No indication this is even about Hillary."
Podesta made the argument despite Comey saying the newly discovered emails are possibly "pertinent" to the larger Clinton email investigation.
Trump made a total of three campaign stop Saturday, with Election Day just 10 days away.
In Colorado, where Trump trails Clinton by single digits, he suggested the effort to protect Clinton went all the way to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the Obama administration’s top law enforcement officer.
In late-June, Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, got off his plane in Phoenix to talk with Lynch, whose plane was on the same tarmac.
Lynch has said they talked about golf, travel and grandchildren. But the private meeting occurred days before the FBI interviewed Clinton, then closed the case.
“I’ve had a plane for a long time, and I’ve never had anybody walk off the runway and into my plane,” Trump said in Colorado.
The Clinton campaign late Saturday argued Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates also objected to Comey sending the letter.
Trump on Saturday also campaigned in North Carolina and Arizona, where he is in tight races with Clinton to win the White House.
Clinton on Saturday also campaigned i

Abedin reportedly pleads ignorance of how emails at center of latest Clinton probe got on computer


Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin reportedly has said she does not know how tens of thousands of emails related to the FBI investigation of her boss' personal server were found on a laptop she shared with her now-estranged husband, former New York Congressman Anthony Weiner.
The Washington Post reported that Abedin was not a regular user of the laptop in question. The paper also reported that Abedin's lawyers did not bother to search the device for work-related emails after she agreed to turn over such messages to the State Department.
On Saturday, a senior law enforcement official told Fox News that the laptop contained "five digits," or at least 10,000, emails of interest to investigators.
The source also told Fox News that law enforcement officials think it's highly unlikely that all of the newfound emails are duplicates, as the Clinton campaign has suggested. The Post reported, citing former FBI officials, that investigators would likely use a computer program to weed out duplicate emails before examining the remaining messages for possible criminality.
Meanwhile, The New York Times reported that several Clinton allies have suggested the Democratic nominee distance herself from Abedin, who has had a professional relationship with Clinton for two decades. In that capacity, Clinton's team defended an unusual employment arrangement in which Abedin was paid by the Clinton Foundation, a consulting firm called Teneo and the State Department all at once.
Clinton also stood by Abedin when Weiner's first online sex scandal cost him his seat in Congress, and when his second imploded his bid for New York mayor. When Abedin announced her separation from Weiner earlier this year, it was Clinton's campaign that sent her statement to reporters.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
Others suggested to the Times that the latest twist in the email investigation would make it impossible for Clinton to make Abedin part of her White House team if she is elected president next month. The paper also reported that Abedin did not travel with Clinton on a swing through Florida Saturday, instead working out of the campaign's Brooklyn headquarters.
"We of course stand behind her," Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told reporters, adding Abedin has "completely and voluntarily complied with and cooperated with the investigation."
The Post reported that Abedin gave a sworn deposition this past June, saying that she had "looked for all the devices that may have any of my State Department work on it and ... gave them to my attorneys for them to review for all relevant documents."
Two months earlier, Abedin told the FBI that her attorneys had asked the State Department about how to conduct a review of work messages from her personal laptop and Blackberry, but received no response.
The FBI announced Friday that it had restarted an investigation into emails Clinton sent on a private server system while secretary of state, as a result of a probe into Weiner's, “sexting,” or sending sexually-suggestive electronic messages, to a teenage girl.
The FBI conducted a roughly two-year investigation into Clinton’s use of a private server system, finding several emails marked as classified and concluding that she had been “extremely careless.” However, the agency did not find evidence that Clinton had been criminally negligent and did not recommend criminal charges to the Justice Department.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Clinton Email Cartoons





Gregg Jarrett: FBI reopens email investigation. Is a Clinton presidency doomed?


If past is prologue, and it usually is, then a Hillary Clinton presidency may be engulfed and disabled by scandal.
Make that plural --scandals.  As a consequence, she is likely to accomplish little on behalf of the American people.  In other words, her presidency could be dead on arrival the moment she is sworn into office.         
How do we know this?  First, the FBI announced Friday that it is reopening its criminal investigation of Clinton’s personal email server.
FBI Director James Comey did not give details except to convey that, in connection with an unrelated case, new evidence had been uncovered.  The Director said his agency would “review these new emails to determine whether they contain classified information.”
This is a stunning new development. It will surely do enormous damage to Clinton’s chances of winning the office she has long coveted.  But if she is elected notwithstanding, the FBI investigation itself will hobble her presidency from the outset.  The cloud of distrust and scandal that already hovers over Clinton could grow exponentially.             
Second, the powerful chairman of a congressional committee and many others on Capitol Hill are vowing to pursue their investigations of wrongdoing by Clinton. These are the very people with whom the new president must work to accomplish anything meaningful on behalf of Americans who are yearning for something other than gridlock in Washington.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
But the WikiLeaks emails are like gasoline on a fire. Clinton doesn’t deny their authenticity.  And every day begets yet another damning revelation of misdeeds and concomitant cover-ups.  Even Clinton’s own aides and allies express bewilderment over her chronic mistakes.  Some are appalled.      
Why would Clinton behave with such reckless abandon when so much is at stake? Because Clinton seems addicted to misbehavior, yet never recognizing it as such.
As pointed out in my last column, she routinely breaches the bounds of propriety.  She steps right up to the line of illegality and dangles her foot over it, unconscious or uncaring of the repercussions.
If her activities are not illegal, they are surely unethical.  By her own actions, she has transformed herself into the poster child for moral turpitude.  And there is no reason to believe she will suddenly stop upon assuming the nation’s highest office, should she win the election.  Indeed, sitting in the Oval Office may only serve to embolden her to push the envelope of opprobrium even further.    
Let’s review.  She stands accused of deliberately evading public disclosure laws by hiding emails on a private server, then lying about it.  She is suspected of using her position as Secretary of State to confer benefits in exchange for money from foreign donors (notoriously called “pay-for-play”).  It looks like she and her husband leveraged their charity foundation to enriched themselves personally to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.
And those are just her recent shenanigans.  Illegality?  Graft?  Corruption?  Malfeasance?  Pick your favorite noun.
Investigations Into What?
Clinton did not tell the truth in several of her statements, according to FBI Director James Comey. The Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, has sent an official referral to the FBI to open an investigation into whether Clinton perjured herself in her sworn testimony before Congress when she insisted she did not send or receive anything marked classified via her private emails.  That’s just one of her alleged deceptions.
Under Title 18, Section 162 of the federal code, a perjury conviction carries up to 5 years in prison.  So the matter of lying to Congress is not just a pesky issue that will vanish after November 8th.  Rep. Chaffetz is determined to pursue it and so are many of his colleagues.  But that’s not all.
Chaffetz is now curious about whether the FBI’s decision not to recommend criminal prosecution of Clinton for mishandling classified documents was swayed  by the $ 675,000 given by a close Clinton ally to the wife of the FBI official overseeing the investigation.  It smacks of illegal influence-peddling.   
And what about the claim of an FBI agent that Clinton aide Patrick Kennedy tried to declassify and bury one of Clinton’s legally toxic documents… in a quid pro quo favor for the Bureau?  That smacks of obstruction of justice.  Again, Chaffetz wants to know.  And so does Speaker of the House Paul Ryan who is promising to dig into the suspicious offer.
There is also the matter of whether Clinton’s wholesale deletion of thousands of emails after Congress had issued a subpoena for them constitutes “destruction of evidence” which is also a crime.  How did that happen?  The people who seem to know are invoking the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination.  More immunity deals might loosen lips.   
Numerous reports indicate that wealthy donors to Clinton’s foundation secured special access to her as Secretary of State.  This, too, may be part of the upcoming congressional investigation.  It is against the law for a public official to use his or her position to confer benefits in exchange for money.  Sen. John Cornyn, the second-ranking GOP senator, is demanding answers.
The Big-Bucks Gravy Train
There are multiple reports that the FBI has opened a criminal investigation into potential corruption within the Clinton Foundation.  Newly leaked emails show that charity official Doug Band, while raising money for the foundation, also steered millions of dollars to Bill Clinton.  Quite the cozy relationship.  However, if the foundation was not operating strictly as a charity under the laws governing non-profit groups, it could be deemed an illegal enterprise.  In other words, criminal fraud.
How much money did the former president pocket?  One Band email is especially revealing : “President Clinton’s business arrangements have yielded more than $ 30 million for him personally, with $ 66 million to be paid out over the next nine years should he chose to continue with the current engagements.”
The boat-loads of cash came from Clinton foundation donors --the same donors who had business before Clinton's State Department and some of whom  appear to have received benefits therefrom.  For example, Hillary helped UBS avoid the IRS, and then Bill got paid $ 1.5 million dollars.  Thereafter, their foundation received a ten-fold increase in donations.  If that was a reward for Hillary’s machinations, then it constitutes bribery under federal law, 18 U.S.C., section 201.
When asked recently to explain what appears to be blatant double dealing and the stench of pay-for-play, the Clinton campaign did not really deny it, but simply said the charity did wonderful work.  It certainly did --it did wonderful work enriching the Clintons’ bank account.
If you ever wondered how Bill and Hillary got so outrageously rich, Band's emails make explicit the compelling and incriminating evidence the Clintons used their foundation for personal profit.  It's a prosecutor's dream.  A "smoking gun" document if ever there was one.
While Bill has stayed mum on the subject, Chelsea Clinton expressed some dismay that Band was using the foundation to “hustle business”, but I doubt she was objecting to her future inheritance.  After all, why derail the “gravy train” when it’s running on a slick track at high speed?
More than 50 House Republicans have urged the Department of Justice to appoint a “special prosecutor” to investigate the Clinton Foundation.  Yeah, fat chance.  The objectivity of Attorney General Loretta Lynch was shattered when she hung out with Bill on her plane for a half hour just before she decided there would be no criminal prosecution of Hillary.  And if she becomes president, there is zero Clinton’s newly appointed A-G will decide to investigate the new boss.  No one wants to become the next Archibald Cox.  (See “Saturday Night Massacre”.)
Watergate Redux
Speaking of Watergate, after Richard Nixon fired Cox, Congress began to toy with the notion of creating a special prosecutor who was not controlled by the executive branch which he or she was investigating.  You know, conflict of interest and all that.  Thus, the Independent Counsel Act was enacted.  This is a nifty legal device which could be employed to investigate Clinton by circumventing DOJ.
Yes, the law has expired.  But it could be reauthorized immediately by Congress since the full language of the statute still exists.  It was resurrected once before, so it can be done again.  Coincidentally, the most famous Independent Counsel, Kenneth Starr, composed a report that led to the impeachment of… yes… Bill Clinton.  (See “blue dress”.)
Of course, the President must sign the bill into law.  But would Obama now, or Clinton later, dare to veto legislation meant to curb the abuses of power?  How could that be justified?  Think of the political backlash.
Much can be learned from Nixon’s demise.  He aided and abetted crimes, lied and obstructed justice.  In the end, it caught up with him and he resigned in disgrace.  The only American president to do so.
At the time, a young Hillary Rodham was serving as a junior member of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry staff which was investigating Nixon and Watergate.  Given all that has happened and all she has done, one wonders if she learned anything from that experience.
She might have learned how power corrupts.  And yet, here we are.
She might also have learned that scandals tend to disable presidents.  Since it is likely that Clinton has been thinking (or dreaming) of becoming president for a very long time, why would she engage in such risky and aberrant behavior?  It is truly confounding.
Hillary Clinton may well end up assuming the presidency.  But winning an election is different than the hard business of governing.  That’s what Nixon learned after his landslide victory over Sen. George McGovern in 1972.
Nixon viewed his re-election as an overwhelming mandate.  Yet, the scandal of Watergate soon engulfed him.  It so consumed his presidency and the public’s perception of him, that a weakened Nixon lost the ability to work with Congress.  Very little legislation was accomplished for the benefit of the American people.
Nixon squandered the public’s trust and good will…by his own inexplicable actions.  Maybe it was the intoxicating influence of high office.  Or maybe it was simply his own inner demons.
But Americans have reason to worry that a President Hillary Clinton could suffer a similar and tragic fate.

TRUMP CALLED IT MONTHS AGO: Anthony Weiner threatens national security

Source: New Clinton email probe linked to Anthony Weiner
The FBI announced Friday it had uncovered news emails related to its investigation of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton‘s handling of classified information while conducting a separate investigation into the pervy sexting habits of former Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner. Weiner of course is the estranged husband of Hillary’s closest aide, Huma Abedin who herself figures prominently in Clinton’s email scandals.
The FBI announced Friday it had uncovered news emails related to its investigation of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton‘s handling of classified information while conducting a separate investigation into the pervy sexting habits of former Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner. Weiner of course is the estranged husband of Hillary’s closest aide, Huma Abedin who herself figures prominently in Clinton’s email scandals.
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump saw this coming from a mile away, fingering Weiner as a potential national security threat all the way back in August of 2015. “It came out that Huma Abedin knows all about Hillary’s private illegal emails,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Huma’s PR husband, Anthony Weiner, will tell the world.”
Abedin recently announced the couple’s separation after Weiner became embroiled in a new series of embarrassing online sexting scandals, including one allegedly involving an underage girl that prompted the FBI to investigate.
One month earlier, Trump said he didn’t like the thought of “Huma going home at night and telling Anthony Weiner all of these secrets.”
Trump was sounding the alarm about Weiner as early September 2013, when he wrote that Huma should “dump the sicko Weiner” because he was “a calamity who is bringing her down with him.”

Giuliani: Initial FBI probe of Clinton's emails 'was a sham'

Giuliani: FBI did 'irresponsible' investigation on Clinton
Former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani ripped into the FBI's early investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server Friday night, calling it a "sham" and saying the bureau did "a completely irresponsible" job.
"If you read the [summary] of her interview, it’s absurd. The FBI agent doing that [summary] didn’t follow up on anything," Giuliani told Fox News' Sean Hannity on "Hannity." "In other words, she was questioned as follows 'Did you do the murder?' 'No.' 'Thank you.' And they walked out.
The FBI is investigating whether there is classified information in new emails uncovered during the sexting investigation of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of one of Hillary Clinton's closest aides.
FBI Director James Comey had announced in July that "no reasonable prosecutor" would seek an indictment against Clinton for mishandling classified information while secretary of state, though he noted that she had been "extremely careless." He notified congressional leaders of the new turn in the investigation Friday, though he did not reveal details of the probe.
"The reality is, the report that Comey gave to us [in July] before he came to the conclusion that she shouldn’t be prosecuted was a report that any prosecutor would have taken before a grand jury, probably got an indictment, and the evidence of intent is overwhelming," said Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor. "You don’t interview someone on a Saturday and put out a complete report on a Tuesday, unless the report was written before you interviewed her."
"The cover-up is worse than the crime," Giuliani added. "Although in this particular case, the crime was pretty bad, exposing national security information to countries we know can take it from us ... And for that, you shouldn’t be allowed to get off.

EXCLUSIVE: Comey memo to FBI staffers says election, timing required disclosure of renewed probe

Memo: FBI director says election made disclosure necessary
FBI Director James Comey told his bureau that he broke with custom in alerting lawmakers that the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server was being reopened because of its political sensitivity.
In an internal memo obtained by Fox News, the beleaguered director noted that the FBI typically would not communicate with the public when reopening a case, according to a Department of Justice source. But Comey said he had to in this case because Clinton is seeking the White House in an election on Nov. 8.
“Of course we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed,” Comey wrote. "I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record.
“At the same time, however, given that we do not know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression,” Comey’s letter continued. "In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter, and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directy from me about it."
The bombshell revelation that newly discovered emails had prompted a new look into whether Clinton or those around her had broken the law my mishandling sensitive information rocked the race for the White House Friday.
Comey informed eight Republican lawmakers that new emails had surfaced that were relevant to the investigation, and warranted a new look.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
Comey announced in July that the FBI had wrapped up a year-long investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server for official business and concluded that while she was “extremely careless,” he could not recommend that the Justice Department seek an indictment. The decision was blasted by Republicans, and FoxNews.com reported earlier this month that career DOJ and FBI workers were furious.
Word of the server, at Clinton’s home in Chappaqua, N.Y., first broke in early 2015. Clinton had used the private email server to conduct government business while serving from 2009-2013, but insisted that she handed over all work-related emails to the State Department.
The FBI investigation determined that thousands of messages that would later be marked classified by the State Department retroactively were on the server. Federal law makes it a crime for a government employee to possess classified information in an unsecure manner, and the relevant statute does not require a finding of intent.

CartoonsDemsRinos