In the final hours of Barack Obama's presidency, some White House
officials reportedly raced to spread and preserve information about
possible communications between associates of then-candidate Donald
Trump and Russians.
The New York Times, citing former American officials,
reported that these officials were concerned that the information they
were gaining on the Russian meddling in the election and the possible
campaign contact could be compromised with the new administration, and
they wanted to set up any future investigation with the information.
According to The Times, after Obama asked for an
investigation into Russian tampering into the elections, officials found
some "damning" evidence.
A former intelligence official confirmed to Fox News
that the Obama administration was determined to keep the Russian issue
alive and data on Moscow's election interference was circulated broadly.
The usual intelligence practice is to circulate
assessments privately, but such was the gravity of Russia's actions that
there were two versions - one for the public to digest and the other
classified, the former official said.
The New York Times reported that intelligence
agencies pushed forward as much “raw” intelligence they could analyze.
The intelligence reports were also reportedly labeled a low
classification level, so they would be accessible to more government
workers — and some European allies.
The Obama officials reportedly wanted to make sure
that as many individuals — with the proper clearances — could see the
intelligence. One of the tactics reportedly used was that officials
asked pointed questions during intelligence briefings. The report said
the answers to those questions are archived.
Congressional staffers have said they are unaware of any evidence that materials related to Russia are not being preserved.
But Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New
York said last week: "There is real concern that some in the
administration may try to cover up its ties to Russia by deleting
emails, texts and other records that could shine a light on those
connections. These records are likely to be the subject of executive
branch as well as congressional investigations and must be preserved."
The Times report was released the same day that
allegations emerged that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had two
conversations with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. during last year’s
presidential campaign.
The Wall Street Journal reported
that U.S. investigators had examined contacts between Sessions and
Russian officials and that the Justice Department was "wringing its
hands" about how to proceed in the matter.
The Journal also reported that Sessions did not know that his communications were under investigation.
Reports about the meetings appeared to contradict a
statement Sessions made during his confirmation hearing to become
attorney general.
Sessions was asked by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., how
he would respond "if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with
the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the
course of this campaign."When contacted by Fox News late Wednesday,
Sessions said, "I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues
of the campaign. I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is
false."
Earlier this year, the FBI interviewed Michael Flynn,
then Trump's national security adviser, about his contacts with
Russia's ambassador to the U.S. after the election. Flynn was fired
after it was revealed that he misled Vice President Pence and other
White House officials about the nature of his discussions with the
envoy.
Trump, for his part, has denied that his campaign had
any contact with Russian officials. The Times report pointed out that
Trump has accused Obama officials with playing up the Russia story.
“The only new piece of information that has come to
light is that political appointees in the Obama administration have
sought to create a false narrative to make an excuse for their own
defeat in the election,” Sean Spicer, the current White House spokesman,
said, according to The Times. “There continues to be no there, there.”
The intelligence community has assessed that Russia's
hacking of Democratic groups and operatives was carried out to help
Trump defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Trump has denied having any knowledge that aides were in touch with Russian intelligence agents during the election.