A government watchdog who played a central role in
the Hillary Clinton email investigation during the Obama administration
told Fox News that he, his family and his staffers faced an intense
backlash at the time from Clinton allies – and that the campaign even
put out word that it planned to fire him if the Democratic presidential
nominee won the 2016 election.
“There was personal blowback.
Personal blowback to me, to my family, to my office,” former
Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough III said.
The Obama appointee discussed his role in the Clinton
email probe for the first time on television, during an exclusive
interview with Fox News. McCullough – who came to the inspector general
position with more than two decades of experience at the FBI, Treasury
and intelligence community – shed light on how quickly the probe was
politicized and his office was marginalized by Democrats.
In January 2016, after McCullough told the Republican
leadership on the Senate intelligence and foreign affairs committees
that emails beyond the “Top Secret” level passed through the former
secretary of state's unsecured personal server, the backlash
intensified.
Former Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough III.
“All of a sudden I became a shill of the right,”
McCullough recalled. “And I was told by members of Congress, ‘Be
careful. You're losing your credibility. You need to be careful. There
are people out to get you.’”
But the former inspector general, with responsibility
for the 17 intelligence agencies, said the executive who recommended him
to the Obama administration for the job – then-Director of National
Intelligence James Clapper – was also disturbed by the independent
Clinton email findings.
“[Clapper] said, ‘This is extremely reckless.’ And he
mentioned something about -- the campaign … will have heartburn about
that,” McCullough said.
He said Clapper's Clinton email comments came during an
in-person meeting about a year before the presidential election – in
late December 2015 or early 2016. “[Clapper] was as off-put as the rest
of us were.”
After the Clapper meeting, McCullough said his team was
marginalized. “I was told by senior officials to keep [Clapper] out of
it,” he said, while acknowledging he tried to keep his boss in the loop.
As one of the few people who viewed the 22 Top Secret
Clinton emails deemed too classified to release under any circumstances,
the former IG said, “There was a very good reason to withhold those
emails ... there would have been harm to national security.” McCullough
went further, telling Fox News that “sources and methods, lives and
operations” could be put at risk.
Some of those email exchanges
contained Special Access Privilege (SAP) information characterized by intel experts as “above top secret.”
“I was told by members of Congress,
‘Be careful. You're losing your credibility. You need to be careful.
There are people out to get you.’”
WikiLeaks documents show the campaign was formulating talking points as the review of 30,000 Clinton emails was ongoing.
The campaign team wrote in August 2015
that
“Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. When information
is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously
unclassified to be upgraded to classified.”
McCullough was critical of the campaign’s response, as
the classified review had barely begun. “There was an effort … certainly
on the part of the campaign to mislead people into thinking that there
was nothing to see here,” McCullough said.
In March 2016, seven senior Democrats sent a letter to
McCullough and his State Department counterpart, saying they had serious
questions about the impartiality of the Clinton email review. However,
McCullough was not making the decisions on what material in Clinton’s
emails was classified -- he was passing along the findings of the
individual agencies who got the intelligence and have final say on
classification.
“I think there was certainly a coordinated strategy,” McCullough said.
McCullough described one confrontation with Democratic
Sen. Dianne Feinstein's office just six weeks before the election, amid
pressure to respond to the letter – which Feinstein had co-signed.
“I thought that any response to that letter would just
hyper-politicize the situation,” McCullough said. “I recall even
offering to resign, to the staff director. I said, ‘Tell [Feinstein]
I'll resign tonight. I'd be happy to go. I'm not going to respond to
that letter. It's just that simple.”
As Election Day approached, McCullough said the threats
went further, singling out him and another senior government
investigator on the email case.
“It was told in no uncertain terms, by a source
directly from the campaign, that we would be the first two to be fired
-- with [Clinton’s] administration. That that was definitely going to
happen,” he said.
McCullough said he was just trying to do his job, which
requires independence. "I was, in this context, a whistleblower. I was
explaining to Congress -- I was doing exactly what they had expected me
to do. Exactly what I promised them I would do during my confirmation
hearing,” he said. “... This was a political matter, and all of a sudden
I was the enemy."
He said pressures also increased early on from
Clinton’s former team at the State Department, especially top official
Patrick Kennedy.
"State Department management didn't want us
there,” McCullough said. “We knew we had had a security problem at this
point. We had a possible compromise."
Speaking about the case more than a year after the FBI
probe concluded, McCullough in his interview also addressed the
possibility that a more cooperative State Department and Clinton
campaign might have precluded the FBI’s involvement from the start.
“Had they come in with the server willingly, without
having us to refer this to the bureau … maybe we could have worked with
the State Department,” he said.
More than 2,100 classified emails passed through
Clinton's personal server, which was used exclusively for government
business. No one has been charged.
Asked what would have happened to him if he had done such a thing, McCullough said: “I'd be sitting in Leavenworth right now.”
Fox News asked a Clinton campaign spokesman, Feinstein’s office and Clapper for comment. There was no immediate response.
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence
correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She
covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of
Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based
correspondent.