California senator and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris assured town hall attendees on Tuesday night that the "odds-on favorite" under Medicare For All is that you will be able to keep your doctor.
Harris
was asked about her plans for healthcare reform during a televised town
hall in South Carolina. She responded by reiterating her belief that
access to healthcare should be a "right" and how she's been a proud
supporter of Medicare For All.
She then knocked the skeptics who
question whether they'd be able to keep their doctor under Medicare For
All, which she admitted was an "understandable point."
"Well 91%
of the doctors in the United States are in the Medicare system, so the
odds-on favorite is that you will be able to keep your doctor," Harris
said.
The senator's remarks resemble the assurances President
Obama gave while promoting the Affordable Care Act, where he told
Americans that "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it,"
something Politifact declared as "Lie of the Year" in 2013.
MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell later pressed Harris on which Medicare For All proposals would she sign as president.
"Mandatory Medicare for everyone," O'Donnell said.
"For everyone," Harris responded.
"So that does mean giving up their current private healthcare plans," O'Donnell followed.
"No,
but they would be entitled to receive and have basically supplemental
insurance, but under Medicare For All and my vision for Medicare For
All, we would expand the coverage of Medicare so it would include
dental, it would vision for our seniors, it would include hearing aids,
which are so expensive," Harris continued. "The goal is that everyone is
going to be in the same system."
Former Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy on Tuesday called out Democratic presidential candidate Eric Swalwell over his "I may be another white guy" comment and called it an example of the sad state of politics.
Swalwell, a California lawmaker who launched his bid to become the president last month, has been struggling to get a footing in the crowded Democratic primary.
In
an interview on Monday with Vice News, Swalwell said, “A white guy who
doesn’t see other identities or understand other experiences should not
be president.”
“I do,” he said. “And where there would be gaps in
my knowledge or my experience, I will pass the mic to people who do have
that experience.”
Swalwell’s comments sit well with Gowdy who criticized them comment during an appearance on “The Story” with Martha MacCallum.
Former Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy lampooned Democratic
presidential candidate Eric Swalwell for admitting that him being “a
white guy” was a flaw in this election.
“Well, Eric’s
clearly riding a wave. I think he’s all the way up to zero in the
polling,” Gowdy said, referring to the recent Morning Consult poll that
shows the Democrat is supported by less than one percent of the surveyed
voters.
“I noticed throughout his political history he ran
against two women that I know of, so if he is concerned there aren’t
enough voices in Congress or in the city council he was on, he didn’t
have any qualms about running against two qualified women back then.
This is what I know and, luckily, what most of our fellow citizens
know,” he continued.
“I noticed throughout his
political history he ran against two women that I know of, so if he is
concerned there aren’t enough voices in Congress or in the city council
he was on, he didn’t have any qualms about running against two qualified
women back then." — Trey Gowdy
Gowdy
added that it’s “a sad reflection” that Swalwell thinks he can win
support by apologizing for things he has no control over.
“Logic,
objective truth, passion, empathy, no racial or gender strictures. If
you are a good person, I want you governing me regardless of any other
immutable characteristic,” he said.
“I think it is a sad
reflection on our politics if people are actually apologizing for things
over which they have absolutely no control at all and I think most of
my fellow citizens reject that and see this as just Eric pandering,
trying to climb all the way up to one percent in the polling.”
“I
think it is a sad reflection on our politics if people are actually
apologizing for things over which they have absolutely no control at all
and I think most of my fellow citizens reject that and see this as just
Eric pandering, trying to climb all the way up to one percent in the
polling.” — Trey Gowdy
This isn’t the
first time Swalwell tried to pander to the far-left of the party. From
the onset of his campaign, he promised to pick a woman as his running
mate because he’s a “white man” who knows “where I can't speak to
someone else's experience.”
Earlier
this month, Swalwell was also ridiculed after stumbling over his
knowledge of the Constitution in a bid to score political points and
complaining that the Constitution doesn’t mention “woman”. Many pointed
out that “Man” is also not mentioned in the Constitution.
The "'Deep State' is in full panic mode" after President Trump authorized Attorney General Barr to declassify information relating to the origins of the Russia probe last week, this according to Fox News host Sean Hannity.
Hannity
sent out yet another warning to those involved with the Russia
investigation and assured the American people that they will "see the
truth" for themselves.
Tonight the 'Deep State' is in full panic mode — Sean Hannity
The Fox News host also addressed former FBI director James Comey who wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post Tuesday critical of the investigation.
Comey wrote in The Washington Post on Tuesday, "There
was no corruption. There was no treason. There was no attempted coup.
Those are lies, and dumb lies at that. There were just good people
trying to figure out what was true, under unprecedented circumstances."
Hannity
continued to warn Comey and other Obama-era intelligence officials such
as former DNI James Clapper and former CIA director John Brennan who
have been vocal against Trump authorizing declassification information
in the Russia probe.
"And I warned you before, you do have the
right to remain silent. You should have taken my advice from the get-go.
Sadly, I think that your rage for President Trump and intense love of
the spotlight is really overcoming every bit of common sense that you
might have," Hannity warned.
"They are even digging bigger holes every single time they open their mouths," Hannity said.
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tex, called out Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn, over a now-deleted tweet that suggested having a merit-based immigration system would disadvantage Latino migrants.
Earlier this month, President Trump unveiled his plans for immigration
reform, including the installation of a merit-based system that grants
migrants entry into the United States based on their trade, skill
level, and education.
On Tuesday night, Omar slammed Trump's proposal in a tweet that has since been deleted from her Twitter page.
A
"merit based" immigration policy is fueled by racism towards the Latinx
community," Omar wrote. "Our immigration policies shouldn't be based on
discrimination, fear, or bigotry. We should welcome immigrants to our
country and offer a simple way to citizenship."
That sparked a ton of blowback from critics.
Sen.
Cruz also weighed in and called out the Democratic Party for
apparently believing that "Hispanic immigrants can’t qualify for
skills-based legal immigration."
"As the son of a Cuban immigrant
whose Dad came to get a math degree & become a computer programmer,
I’m troubled that Dems seem to believe Hispanic immigrants can’t qualify
for skills-based legal immigration," Cruz tweeted. "Bringing in more
scientists, engineers & doctors is good for US jobs."
Rep. Omar's office did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.
FILE – In this July 4, 2018, file photo, the Huawei logo is seen in a
shopping mall in Beijing. China’s latest propaganda broadside in its
trade war with the U.S. features an unusual star: Trevor Noah of the
Daily Show. A recent clip from the popular comedy tv show discussing
Chinese equipment maker Huawei’s dominance in 5G mobile technology ran
on Chinese state broadcaster CCTV’s national lunchtime news on Monday as
part of a package of stories attacking the U.S. position in the ongoing
trade war. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File)
The founder of Chinese Telecom Huawei says he is prepared for a drawn out fight with the U.S.
During a recent interview, the tech CEO remained defiant that the
recent black list against the company will ultimately not effect
business.
He did concede however, the Trump administration’s trade tariffs will
make it more difficult for Huawei to compete with it’s rival companies.
He also said he was not prepared to back down in the face of American trade pressure.
“There is the possibility this may become long-lasting,” said Ren
Zhengfei. “We’ve prepared for a protracted battle, not for a short one.
Maybe we will become stronger through the long-term fight. After we go
through the break-in period of our products, we may become stronger.”
The founder also went on to reject claims Huawei would be a part of
sanctions negotiations between Washington and Beijing, implying he has
no interest in negotiating with the White House.
U.S. President Donald Trump reacts during a news conference with Japan’s
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, at Akasaka Palace in Tokyo, Japan, on
Monday, May 27, 2019. (Kiyoshi Ota/Pool Photo via AP)
President Trump says “everybody wants” the new trade deal with Canada and Mexico.
The president made the remark on the USMCA during a press conference
in Japan Monday, and called it a “deal that’s gotten universal praise.”
President Trump made the agreement with then-Mexican president
Enrique Pena Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau back in
2018, however it still needs to be ratified by Congress.
The president said he will work with congressional Democrats on the deal and suggested House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will back it.
“Unions love it. Farmers love it. Manufacturers love it. You won’t
have companies leaving and going to Mexico and going to Canada and going
like they were for many, many years,” said President Trump. “It’s a
great deal. I would imagine that Nancy Pelosi would approve that. I
would think it would be very hard not to, but we’ll see.”
Pelosi is reportedly seeking to have stronger enforcement provisions negotiated into the deal.
The President has yet to submit the agreement to Congress for
ratification, but once he does lawmakers must vote on it within 60 days.
