Sunday, October 13, 2013

Just how much does HealthCare.gov cost?

healthcare.gov website up.jpg
Government officials deny the price tag on the troubled ObamaCare website is as big as $634 million, as widely reported on Thursday. Nonetheless, a close look at the cost of HealthCare.gov and the overall architecture of this giant federal program reveals no real bargain for the American taxpayer.
"What a train wreck. How can we tax people for not buying a product from a website that doesn't work?" Speaker of the House John Boehner demanded on Wednesday, as report after report indicated that the software problems experienced by the online portal were nowhere near being resolved. Computer experts who spoke with FoxNews.com this week said bad code and a lack of testing could be the culprit, though more complicated problems could mean issues for months to come.

Allen West: Obama is a Spoiled Brat, Don't Reward Bad Behavior


In simply Southern terms, Allen West defined President Obama as a “spoiled brat child.”
The former Florida Representative said America has given Obama everything he wanted, during an interview on the "The Steve Malzberg Show” show Thursday:
“We gave him a state senator position in Chicago, we gave him a U.S. Senate position out of the state of Illinois, unproven, untested, no resume, we gave him the presidency — twice. So if you continue to reward bad behavior, you're going to get more of that bad behavior."
The majority of Americans continue to accuse Republicans for the nearly-two-week-long government shutdown. However, it is the President who seems to be immalleable. So much for Hope, Change and Progress.





The Senate will return to work Sunday and attempt to find another way to end the partial shutdown of government services and reach an agreement on the nation's borrowing limit before an October 17 deadline after Democrats rejected a proposal by Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins that had bipartisan support.
Leaders of the Democratic-led Senate rejected the proposal to reopen the government and raise the debt ceiling Saturday before heading down Pennsylvania Avenue to meet with President Obama at the White House.
Whether Senate Democrats will try to revive the proposal was unclear. They left the 75-minute meeting without talking to reporters. Sen. Collins appeared hopeful that Democrats may be open to reviving the plan.
"Despite [Senate Majority Leader] Senator Harry Reid's unfortunate dismissal of the 6-point plan, …. it continues to attract bipartisan support,” Collins said. “Six Senate Republicans and six Senate Democrats met twice today to discuss how we could move forward with the plan or some version of it. These meetings were constructive and give me hope that a bipartisan solution … is within our reach."
Reid rejected the plan  -- which calls for funding the government for six months and increasing the federal debt limit through January -- purportedly, in part, because the spending level of $967 billion next year was too low, despite it providing more flexibility in administering the federal budget cuts under sequester.
Collins’ plan also calls for a two-year delay on ObamaCare's medical device tax and requires income verification for Americans seeking subsidies for ObamaCare.
“Susan Collins  is one of my favorite senators, Democrat or Republican,” Reid said. “I appreciate her effort, as always, to find a consensus. But the plan that she suggested … is not going to any place at this stage.”
The upper chamber also failed the get the necessary 60 votes on a bill to increase the debt limit through 2014 that was “clean” of Republican demands for spending cuts or changes to ObamaCare.
In the Republican-controlled House, negotiations ended abruptly when Republicans refused to let Democrats vote on a bill to reopen the government, which resulted in an exchange between a staffer from each party.
“They amended the rules so only Majority Leader Eric Cantor can put something on the floor to open the government,” said Maryland Democratic Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House minority whip.
Earlier in the day, House Speaker John Boehner told his caucus in a closed-door meeting that he and the president still have no deal.
"The Senate needs to hold tough," Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., said Boehner told House GOP lawmakers. "The president now isn't negotiating with us."
The White House rejected a House plan to open the government for just six weeks.
The partial government shutdown kicked in Oct. 1, after lawmakers failed to reach a temporary spending bill. And the federal government is projected to miss the debt ceiling deadline on Thursday unless Congress increases the federal government’s borrowing limit.
Still, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are keeping an open dialogue, which appears to show the best opportunity to resolve the fiscal crisis is now in the upper chamber.
"The only thing that's happening right now is Sen. Reid and Sen. McConnell are talking,” said Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn. “And I view that as progress.”
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said early Saturday: “Congress must do its job and raise the debt limit to pay the bills we have incurred and avoid default. It is unfortunate that the common sense, clean debt limit increase proposed by Senate Democrats was refused. … This bill would have taken the threat of default off the table.”

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Conservative website vows to 'unmask leftists in the media'

leftists in the media'


FILE: Oct. 10, 2013: The Rev. Al Sharpton receiving a citation from the Philadelphia City Council, at City Hall in Philadelphia, Pa.AP
A California conservative group is launching a bare-knuckle campaign to expose the so-called liberal media and its advertisers -- vowing to knock down the highest-profile players and “unmask leftists in the media.”
“The media must be destroyed where they stand,” Truth Revolt, a new project by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, said Sunday before launching a website. “That is our mission.”
To be sure, its first target was MSNBC talk-show host Al Sharpton and major advertiser Ritz Crackers -- an opening flurry followed by at least 15 Sharpton-related stories over roughly the past week.
However, the attack on Ritz, sold in the United States under the Nabisco label and owned by parent company Mondelēz International, has resulted in some criticism among conservatives about a potential job-killing strategy in a slow-growing economy.
Horowitz has hired Breitbart News editor at large Ben Shapiro -- author, Harvard Law School graduate and a well-known voice of the young conservative movement.
The project has been branded as the conservative response to the George Soros-back Media Matters of America, which has used similar tactics to attack members of the so-called “right wing media.”
Horowitz, Shapiro and others also appear eager to take the fight beyond network TV.
“TruthRevolt understands that all politics is local, and therefore looks to fight leftist propaganda at the local level, monitoring local newspapers, television and radio,” according to the website. “TruthRevolt also seeks to stop the left dead in its tracks when it comes to training the next generation, our college campuses.
Exactly who is backing the entire Los Angeles-based Horowitz operation is unclear since the foundation is a 501 (c) 3 charity, which does not require it to disclose contributors on IRS filings.
However, the foundation reported a total of $5.5 million in contributions in 2011, the most recent available year.
The foundation -- whose operations include the project Jihad Watch and which puts out publications and hosts a variety of salons with high-profile conservatives -- also reported $6.4 million in total revenue in 2011, including $914,293 from programming.
Horowitz started the group in 1988 under the name the Center for the Study of Popular Culture to “establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground.” The name was change in 2006 to the foundation.
Horowitz could not be reached for comment despite several attempts.
However, Shapiro recently told The Daily Beast that boycotts like the ones aimed at Sharpton and Ritz are just the beginning.
“Politics is a hard-nosed game, and the right has been playing Marquess of Queensbury rules for a long time on this,” he told the news website.
Political Cartoons by Ken Catalino

Detroit, Obama Town

Political Cartoons by Henry PayneDetroit, the town where Obama got his start in politics?

Judge Judy: 'Government is there to serve us, not the other way around'

Popular television judge Judy Sheindlin – better known as “Judge Judy” – told Megyn Kelly Friday on "The Kelly File" that “government is there to serve us. Not the other way around."
Judge Judy didn’t stop there, also questioning whether the welfare state has allowed people to become too dependent on government.
“What we’ve done to a whole group of people is say, ‘not to worry, if you can’t take care of yourself, we’ll take care of you,’” she said.
At the end of her chat with Kelly, her self-proclaimed "number one fan," Judge Judy wondered if today’s children are too often told that they’re special.
“It gives young people a false sense of reality,” she said. “It creates mediocrity. It stops people from wanting to be better.”

Friday, October 11, 2013

Cruz Calls Out Hecklers at Values Voter Summit

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz effectively dealt with a small group of hecklers who tried to shout him down during his speech Friday at the Values Voter Summit

The shouting started after Cruz had launched into an attack against "that trainwreck, that disaster, that nightmare that is Obamacare."

"It seems that President Obama's paid political operatives are out in force today," Cruz said.

Urgent: Do You Support Sen. Ted Cruz's Efforts to Defund Obamacare? Vote Here.

The smattering of catcalls continued throughout his speech. "I'm curious, is anybody left at the Organizing for America headquarters? Cruz asked at another point, referring to Obama's political action committee.

"I'm actually glad that the president's whole political staff is here instead of actually doing mischief in the country."

The hecklers were eventually hustled out of the room at Washington's Omni Shoreham Hotel.

Peter Roff Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?

"Facts," someone once said, "are stubborn things." If there is one thing that is gnawing the marrow out of political coverage in America today, it's the so-called "fact checkers" whom editors of some of the nation's most prestigious publications have appointed to evaluate the veracity of statements made by candidates for public office.
According to the American Heritage dictionary, the definition of "fact" is: 1) Knowledge or information based on real occurrences; 2) Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed; or 3) A thing that has been done, especially a crime. The last is especially interesting since the way fact-checking has been employed in the last two election cycles is as near to a crime as a journalist can commit.
Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."
[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]
"Republicans see a credibility gap in the Obama Administration," said Dr. Robert S. Lichter, head of the Center for Media and Public Affairs. "PolitiFact rates Republicans as the less credible party."
As the first person to empirically demonstrate the liberal, pro-Democrat bias in the Washington press corps, Lichter's analysis is worth further study and comment.  His study – and in the interests of full disclosure, he was once a professor of mine at the George Washington University  - "examined 100 statements involving factual claims by Democrats (46 claims) and Republicans (54 claims), which were fact-checked by PolitiFact.com during the four month period from the start of President Obama's second term on January 20 through May 22, 2013." The conclusion: Republicans lie more.
Or do they? As the Wall Street Journal's James Taranto has consistently reported, the fact checking business often – too often for anyone's good – turns on matters of opinion rather than matters of "fact." One recent example that drives the point home is the Washington Post's recent fact check that gave President Barack Obama "four Pinocchios" for asserting that he had, in fact, called what happened in Benghazi an act of "terrorism."
According to the Post's Glenn Kessler, Obama did in fact refer to it the next day in a Rose Garden address as an "act of terror," but did not call it "terrorism." Is this a distinction without a difference? Hardly, at least as far as former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney might be concerned. It will be a long time before anyone forgets how the second presidential debate turned into a tag team match with Obama and CNN's Candy Crowley both explaining to the mystified Republican that Romney was, in fact, wrong when he accused the president of not having called the Benghazi attack a terrorist incident.
[See a collection of editorial Cartoons on Benghazi.]
The fact that, as the Lichter study shows, "A majority of Democratic statements (54 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely true, compared to only 18 percent of Republican statements," probably has more to do with how the statements were picked and the subjective bias of the fact checker involved than anything remotely empirical. Likewise, the fact that "a majority of Republican statements (52 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely false, compared to only 24 percent of Democratic statements" probably has more to do with spinning stories than it does with evaluating statements.
There is a "truth gap" in Washington, but it doesn't exist along the lines the fact checkers would have you think. It was Obama who said you could keep the health care you had if you liked it, even if Obamacare became law. It was Obama who said the Citizens United decision would open the floodgates of foreign money into U.S. campaigns. It was Obama who said Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video. It was Obama's IRS that denied conservative political groups had been singled out for special scrutiny. And it was Obama who promised that taxes would not go up for any American making less than $250,000 per year.
All of these statements and plenty more are demonstrably false, though some people still pretend there is truth in them. As the Lichter study demonstrates, it's not so much fact checkers that are needed as it is fact checkers to check the facts being checked.

PolitiFact Bias

Hoystory: "Fact checking frauds"

Self-described "reformed journalist" Matthew Hoy's disgust with PolitiFact only occasionally bubbles over into blog posts at his blog, Hoystory, but this week we have a double helping.

Hoy starts out by pulling the rug out from under PolitiFact's "Pants on Fire" rating of Jeb Hensarling's claim that Congress leaves itself as the only ones not receiving subsidies on the "Obamacare" exchanges.

Hoy:
The point Hensarling was making, which is obvious to anyone with half a brain (which explains Politifraud’s problem), was not that no one was getting subisides, but that Congressional staffers, many of whom make north of $100,000 a year, would be the only ones at that income level who get subsidies from the federal government.

And Hoy continues by pointing out PolitiFact's failure to apply its own standards consistently in rating "False" an obvious use of hyperbole, this time when conservative bloggers mocked the Obama administration for closing the ocean as a result of the partial government shutdown:

In their effort to protect their lord and savior, Barack Obama, from himself, Politifarce conveniently disregarded two of  their own rules on what statements deserve their attention:
In deciding which statements to check, we ask ourselves these questions:
  • Is the statement rooted in a fact that is verifiable? We don’t check opinions, and we recognize that in the world of speechmaking and political rhetoric, there is license for hyperbole.
  • Would a typical person hear or read the statement and wonder: Is that true?

Visit Hoy's Hoystory blog for the whole takedown, and let this serve as a reminder that PolitiFact's problems are legion. We don't have the hours in the day to expose them all, so we're grateful to people like Hoy who take the time to expose PolitiFact's errors and distortions.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

AP Poll: Obama Approval Plummets to 37

Image: AP Poll: Obama Approval Plummets to 37Radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh attacked survey results released on Wednesday that blamed Republicans for the federal shutdown while burying the news that President Barack Obama's approval ratings had plunged to 37 percent among Americans surveyed.

"The point is, once again, there is no media, there is no news," the conservative host said, according to a transcript of his afternoon program. "This is the Democrat Party with activists disguised as journalists. Thirty-seven percent approval.

"And it's not some outlier poll," Limbaugh continued. "You have to read over halfway down into that story to learn that. I haven't seen it anywhere else. It's been on AP, but have you seen anybody else pick that up? It's just classic."

Urgent: Should GOP Stick to Its Guns on Obamacare? Vote Here.

The article was on the Associated Press-GfK survey of 1,227 probable voters conducted Oct. 3-7, with a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.

"Americans are holding Republicans primarily responsible for the partial government shutdown as public esteem sinks for all players in the impasse, President Barack Obama among them, according to a new poll," the report began. "It's a struggle with no heroes."

The article then disclosed that 62 percent of respondents "mainly blamed Republicans for the shutdown" and that "the poll found that the tea party is more than a gang of malcontents in the political landscape, as its supporters in Congress have been portrayed by Democrats.

"Rather, it's a sizable — and divisive — force among Republicans," the AP report said.

But in the seventh paragraph appears the first — and only — reference to Obama's new approval ratings: "Most Americans disapprove of the way Obama is handling his job, the poll suggests, with 53 percent unhappy with his performance and 37 percent approving of it.

"Congress is scraping rock bottom, with a ghastly approval rating of 5 percent."

The report was published by such mainstream media outlets as The Washington Post, The Huffington Post, and National Public Radio.

The information appeared in the seventh paragraph of The Huffington Post's story and in the eighth paragraph of those published in The Washington Post and on NPR.

Limbaugh charged that such coverage was wrong about what was actually occurring in Washington.

"If you are a conservative media guy inside the Beltway, you're convinced that Obama's winning everything," he said. "If you're a conservative media guy inside the Beltway and you're subjected to that narrative each and every day, you think the Republicans are really getting shellacked. You think they're taking it on the chin.

"It's the exact opposite," Limbaugh said. "It's the exact opposite of what's happening outside the Beltway."

"The president's at 37 percent. The shutdown is going on. Now we learn that five military families were insulted profoundly with the way the deaths of their service-member relatives were treated.

"It is obvious that this administration is acting purposely to inconvenience and to harm people it considers its political enemies," Limbaugh said.

Further, Limbaugh contrasted the coverage of Obama's new 37 percent rating with coverage by Wolf Blitzer of CNN of its poll on March 13, 2006, when Republican President George W. Bush's rating hit a new low of 36 percent.

"The president's job-approval rating has taken a downward turn again, falling to only 36 percent," the Blitzer excerpt began, according to the Limbaugh transcript. "This represents his lowest rating ever in the CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll … The president's poll numbers are pretty bad, pretty awful right now, rock bottom …"

"Today, Barack Obama's approval number's at 37 percent, and they are not talking about it," Limbaugh said Wednesday. "The AP story in which that poll result is announced has the following headline: "Poll: GOP Gets the Blame in Shutdown." They have a poll that shows that 71 percent of the American people are blaming the Republicans for the shutdown.

"In the same poll, 50 percent are blaming the Democrats for something, but the media says: ''Look, 20 percent spread. Boy, the Republicans are really taking it on the chin for the government shutdown.' But the poll does not say people are upset with the shutdown.

"It's journalistic malpractice," Limbaugh concluded, "except it's not — because it's not journalism."

Among other findings, the AP poll showed that more than 4 in 10 Republicans identified with the tea party and were more apt than other Republicans to insist that their leaders hold firm in the standoff over reopening government and avoiding a default of the nation's debt in coming weeks.
Indeed, the poll showed that everyone making headlines in the dispute has earned poor marks for their trouble, whether Democrat Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, or Republican John Boehner, the House speaker, both with favorability ratings of 18 percent.
And much of the country draws a blank on Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas despite his 21-hour Senate speech before the shutdown. Only half of the poll respondents were familiar enough with him to register an opinion. Among those who did, 32 percent viewed him unfavorably, 16 percent favorably.
Other findings in the AP Poll:
  • Sixty-eight percent said the shutdown is a major problem for the country, including majorities of Republicans (58 percent), Democrats (82 percent) and independents (57 percent).
  • Fifty-two percent said Obama is not doing enough to cooperate with Republicans to end the shutdown; 63 percent say Republicans aren't doing enough to cooperate with him.
  • Republicans are split on just how much cooperation they want. Among those who do not back the tea party, fully 48 percent say their party should be doing more with Obama to find a solution. But only 15 percent of tea-party Republicans want that outreach. The vast majority of them say GOP leaders are doing what they should with the president, or should do even less with him.
  • People seem conflicted or confused about the showdown over the debt limit. Six in 10 predict an economic crisis if the government's ability to borrow isn't renewed later this month with an increase in the debt limit — an expectation widely shared by economists. Yet only 30 percent say they support raising the limit; 46 percent were neutral on the question.
  • More than 4 in 5 poll respondents felt no personal impact from the shutdown. For those who did, thwarted vacations to national parks, difficulty getting work done without federal contacts at their desks, and hitches in government benefits were among the complaints.

"So frustrating," Martha Blair, 71, of Kerrville, Texas, said of the fiscal paralysis as her scheduled national parks vacation sits in limbo. "Somebody needs to jerk those guys together to get a solution, instead of just saying no."

Blair's nine-day trip to national parks with a tour group won't happen if the parks are still closed next month. "I'm concerned," she said, "but it seems kind of trivial to people who are being shut out of work."
In Mount Prospect, Ill., Barbara Olpinski, 51, a Republican who blames Obama and both parties for the shutdown, said her family is already seeing an impact and that will worsen if the impasse goes on. She's an in-home elderly-care director, her daughter is a physician's assistant at a rural clinic that treats patients who rely on government coverage, and her husband is a doctor who can't get flu vaccines for patients on public assistance because deliveries have stopped.
"People don't know how they are going to pay for things, and what will be covered," she said. "Everybody is kind of like holding their wallets."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/public-blames-obama-gop/2013/10/09/id/530025?ns_mail_uid=5689450&ns_mail_job=1541013_10092013&promo_code=15229-1#ixzz2hJJDyW16
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Pelosi exults amid cheers from Latino illegals

Rep. Nancy Pelosi cheerfully led Spanish-language chants of “Si se puede” — or “Yes we can” — at a rally Tuesday for amnesty and immigration, but turnout for the event at the National Mall was far below the organizers’ predictions of 100,000 attendees.
The barriers at the event were set to accommodate 35,000 people, but less than half the area was occupied. Loudspeakers and a large display screen at the rear of the area were almost devoid of listeners or viewers.
The rally was held on public land during a widely hyped government shutdown that has seen the Obama administration rigidly shut tourists, property owners and even World War II veterans out of federally controlled areas. (Related: Obama OKs illegals’ march on Mall, still blocks Americans)

Administration: Penalties for Obamacare Kick in on Valentine's Day

You'll have to get coverage by Valentine's Day or thereabouts to avoid penalties for being uninsured, the Obama administration confirmed Wednesday.
That's about six weeks earlier than a Mar. 31 deadline often cited previously.
The explanation: health insurance coverage typically starts on the first day of a given month, and it takes up to 15 days to process applications.
You still have to be covered by Mar. 31 to avoid the new penalties for remaining uninsured. But to successfully accomplish that you have to send in your application by the middle of February. Coverage would then start on Mar. 1.
The Jackson Hewitt tax preparation company first pointed out the wrinkle with the health care law's least popular requirement.
An administration official confirmed it. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
It's the latest tweak involving complex requirements of President Barack Obama's health care law, known as the Affordable Care Act. Previous adjustments have ranged from the momentous to the mundane. The biggest one was a one-year delay of a requirement that larger employers offer coverage, announced this summer. More recently, the administration has postponed some Spanish-language capabilities of its enrollment website, as well as full functionality on the site small businesses use to sign up.
Brian Haile, senior vice president for health policy at Jackson Hewitt, said government agencies initially had different interpretations of the enrollment deadline. The Health and Human Services department, which is taking the lead in implementing the law, kept referring to a Mar. 31 deadline. But the Internal Revenue Service, which handles most of the financial aspects, suggested that the deadline had to be in February.
"There were inconsistencies," said Haile, adding it took several inquiries by Jackson Hewitt over the last few weeks to clear up the uncertainty.
The health care law was designed to cover the uninsured through a mix of government-subsidized private insurance and a major expansion of the Medicaid safety net program.
The rollout of online insurance markets this month has been snarled by technical glitches that frustrated many consumers. Meanwhile, House Republicans are still pressing their demand for a delay of "Obamacare" provisions, if not its total repeal, as a condition for lifting the partial government shutdown now in its second week.
Starting next year, the law requires virtually all Americans to have insurance or face a tax penalty, triggered after a coverage gap of three months. The penalty starts as low as $95 for 2014, but escalates in subsequent years. There are exemptions for financial hardship and other defined circumstances.
The purpose of the penalty is to nudge as many people as possible into the insurance pool. That would help keep premiums in check, since the law also forbids insurers from turning away people with health problems.
Haile said an earlier enrollment deadline around Valentine's Day may turn out to be a blessing in disguise for the administration, because it creates a natural opportunity to market to young, healthy people, whose premiums are needed to offset medical costs of older generations.
"When thinking about how to attract young people, a Valentine's Day message may be very salient," he said.
The administration says the deadline is actually Feb. 15, the day after Valentine's Day.
That's close enough that the government might be able to make the pitch work.

BIAS BASH: Media declares GOP loser in slimdown

With debt-ceiling talks underway in Washington and the budget battle at a stalemate, the media appears to be picking sides. Fox News contributor Ellen Ratner found several examples of bias in the media coverage of the partial government shutdown.
“I gotta tell you, the media is very biased,” Ratner said on “Bias Bash” on FoxNews.com. “I’m a Lib [liberal], but I’m very strict with our own staff about how not to be so biased and one of the groups I’m going to go after today is the Daily Beast.
Ratner called out two articles on The Daily Beast as examples of media bias. The first was headlined, “GOP Donors Revolt Against Republican-Led Government Shutdown,” and the second was, “Shutdown Aversion: Republicans May Have Just Lost the House.”
“Don’t you think it’s a bit early? We’re not even a year before the elections and we’re already talking about losing the House? I think that that’s bias,” said Ratner.
Ratner went on to discuss whether the media is driving a specific reaction to the partial government shutdown, or whether the media is simply reporting how Americans are feeling.
“I always say, the only poll that counts is on Election Day,” said Ratner. “But when you’re saying, ‘the House is going to be lost’ and it’s 13 months away - that concerns me.”

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Jon Stewart accuses Kathleen Sebelius of lying to him about Obamacare

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius likely thought her interview with Jon Stewart on “The Daily Show” Monday night would be an easy setting to pitch the Obamacare exchanges to young people. Instead, she ended up getting accused of being a liar by the popular comedy host.
During his interview with Sebelius, Stewart repeatedly sought an answer from the secretary on why big businesses got a delay in their Obamacare mandate to provide affordable health insurance to their employees, while individuals did not get a delay in their Obamacare mandate making them purchase health care or face a penalty.
In a rare monologue at the end of the show, Stewart said he remained confused and that he suspected that the secretary may have been lying to him.

“I still don’t understand why individuals have to sign up and businesses don’t, because if the businesses — if she’s saying, ‘well, they get a delay because that doesn’t matter anyway because they already give health care,’ then you think to yourself, ‘#### it, then why do they have to sign up at all,’” he said. “And then I think to myself, ‘well, maybe she’s just lying to me.’”

Pentagon freezes death benefits for fallen soldiers' families

It's another ugly symptom of the partial government shutdown -- and this time it impacts the families of soldiers who are dying for their country.
The Pentagon confirmed Tuesday that, as long as the budget impasse lasts, it will not be able to pay death benefits to the families of troops who've been killed in combat.
"Unfortunately, as a result of the shutdown, we do not have the legal authority to make death gratuity payments at this time," said Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Defense Department spokesman. "However, we are keeping a close eye on those survivors who have lost loved ones serving in the Department of Defense."
House lawmakers, though, are planning to vote Wednesday on a bill to restore funding for the payments. And Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday accused the Obama administration of needlessly withholding the money.
Boehner claimed a bill passed by Congress and signed by the president last week to pay America's troops should have given the Pentagon the latitude "to pay all kinds of bills, including this."
"I think it's disgraceful that they're withholding these benefits," Boehner said, urging Obama to sign the bill that the House will take up on Wednesday.
The bill would still have to pass the Senate before arriving on Obama's desk. If that bill fails to pass, the Pentagon says, families will be reimbursed once Congress passes an appropriations bill.
The Pentagon says it has specific instructions from its budget office not to make payments for deaths that occurred after 11:59 p.m. on Sept. 30, 2013.
Over the weekend, four soldiers -- two of them Army Rangers -- and one Marine were killed while conducting combat operations in Afghanistan. The bodies of the four soldiers will be returned to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday.
Due to the impasse, the families of 25-year-old 1st Lt. Jennifer M. Moreno; 24-year-old Pfc. Cody J. Patterson; 24-year-old Special Agent Joseph M. Peters; 25-year-old Sgt. Patrick C. Hawkins; and 19-year-old Lance Cpl. Jeremiah M. Collins, Jr. will not receive the $100,000 payment that they would have otherwise received within three days of the death.
Adding further insult, the families will have to pay for their own travel to Dover. That's a bill the Pentagon also says it can't pay because of the partial shutdown.
Privately, Defense Department officials say they wish they could pay the families and they admit it's a disgrace that deserves national attention.
"If the department was allowed to make death gratuity payments at any point during shutdown, they would've been paid with great relief," one official said.  
Pentagon officials also say Congress was warned prior to the shutdown that these benefits would be stopped.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said during a press conference on Tuesday he would tell those families that their government "let them down."
After the ceremony at Dover on Wednesday, the families will fly to their home states to conduct private funerals. That's also an expense the Pentagon says it can no longer pay due to the stalemate.

Wisconsin professor tells students Tea Party, Republicans at fault for slimdown

A Wisconsin college professor warned her students they wouldn't be able to get all of their homework done because of the partial government shutdown, and put a partisan spin on the bad news.
“Some of the data gathering assignment will be impossible to complete until the Republican/tea party controlled House of Representatives agrees to fund the government,” University of Wisconsin La Crosse Assistant Geography Professor Rachel Slocum told students in an e-mail.
“The Census website, for instance, is closed,” she continued. “Please do what you can on the assignment. Those parts you are unable to do because of the shutdown will have to wait until Congress decides we actually need a government. Please listen to the news and be prepared to turn in the assignment quickly once our nation re-opens.”
At least one student in the online course reported the professor's political spin to the education blog The College Fix, which first reported the story.
Slocum could not be reached for comment, but a school official told FoxNews.com the issue was addressed.
“It would be inappropriate to use partisan politics in a class, so we contacted the professor in question,” Chancellor Joe Gow told FoxNews.com. “We want to be sure our students feel that they can have a different opinion from others on campus,” Gow added. “She (Slocum) can have a personal conversation with someone, but this e-mail was for an online class so the message is more in an official capacity.”
In a subsequent e-mail from Slocum, also obtained by The College Fix, Slocum sought to downplay the politics of the partial government shutdown that has resulted from Congress' budget impasse.
“The e-mail I sent you all about the government shut down [sic] was not meant to be partisan, but it may have come across that way," she wrote. "It is true that I am dismayed that you cannot easily do the assignment. My opinion is that this shutdown is a bad idea.”
She even pleads with her students at one point, asking them not to forward her e-mails to others outside the class.
“If you want to discuss all of this, let me know and I can make an internal discussion board about it. But please don’t forward my emails to conservative blogs or list servs and I will make sure my emails explain things fully,” she wrote.

Negotiate

Political Cartoons by Eric Allie

7 not-so-essential things still operating during the slimdown

National parks are closed. IRS call centers have no staff. Countless government websites have been taken down.
Yet despite these changes -- which range from inconveniences to major headaches -- a number of not-so-essential government operations are still up and running.
Here are a few that have evaded the partial government shutdown:
The Denali Commission: 
You've probably never heard of The Denali Commission. But the tiny Alaska-based economic development agency gained some notoriety after it emerged that the group's inspector general was petitioning Congress to de-fund it.
But guess what agency survived the "shutdown?" According to its own contingency plan, because the commission's staffers are paid under the prior year's budget, all 14 employees are exempt from furlough, and "reporting to work."
White House Twitter:
Right as Congress missed the deadline last week to pass a spending bill, first lady Michelle Obama's office informed its Twitter followers that "due to Congress's failure to pass legislation to fund the government," updates to the official first lady Twitter account would be limited.
But the White House Twitter account is alive and well.
The account has blasted out a series of tweets calling on Congress to end the budget impasse.
'Let's Move': 
While a number of government websites have been temporarily taken offline, and the first lady's Twitter account has been largely abandoned, not so for Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" campaign.
The website for the first lady's healthy-living initiative remains operational -- though it doesn't appear to have been updated much since late September. The top of the site displays the message: "Cheers to water!"
Park Rangers on Patrol: 
Despite national parks and monuments being shuttered across the country for lack of funds, the National Park Service is devoting considerable resources to putting up barricades and patrolling them.
An innkeeper along the Blue Ridge Parkway who was forced to close his business due to the partial shutdown told FoxNews.com that park rangers have set up a "24/7 blockade" outside his inn -- to prevent would-be customers from coming in.
Obama Campaign Stop: 
President Obama canceled a long-planned trip to Asia over the budget impasse.
But he nevertheless ventured outside the Beltway last week for a rally in nearby Rockville, Md., to pressure Republicans to pass a budget bill.
Patent Office: 
Happen to invent something during the budget stalemate?
Good news. The United States Patent and Trademark Office is open for business. According to the office, it's using fees from the prior year to keep running, and should be able to for roughly four weeks.
IRS Taking, But Not Giving: 
IRS call centers are closed, and the IRS is not issuing refunds during the partial shutdown. 
The agency, though, will gladly accept tax payments during that time. 
The IRS says in a statement on its website: "The IRS will accept and process all tax returns with payments, but will be unable to issue refunds during this time."

Monday, October 7, 2013

Dr. Ben Carson: Obamacare Hurts Just as Healthcare 'Golden Age' Emerges

Just as healthcare enters a "golden age," Obamacare threatens to reverse course, warn Dr. Ben Carson and Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas in a guest editorial for Forbes.

"The full promise of genomic medicine informing diagnosis and treatment beckons from just over the horizon," the two write. Young doctors just starting out "have the ability to alleviate human suffering that no generation of doctors has ever previously known," they say.

Carson retired in May as a professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. He has become a tea party favorite after criticizing the Affordable Care Act at this year's National Prayer Breakfast as President Barack Obama sat on the dais.

Burgess, part of the House's tea party caucus, was a practicing physician before winning Dick Armey's former seat in 2003.

Obamacare was not the product of careful study by a learned group, the two say, but "a hastily contrived political farce that was literally cobbled together at the last possible minute."

The writers are critical that successful state models were not looked at. The Healthy Indiana program, they note, cut healthcare prices by 10 percent during a two-year period.

The Affordable Care Act was never intended to actually become law, they argue "— except that it did." In the past 3 1/2 years since its passage, Obamacare has been "pushed and prodded" by officials "to give it the appearance of workability."

America is on the threshold, they write, of finding out whether it will be a success. Americans without insurance from their employers could begin signing up for state-run exchanges on Oct. 1, but the first week has been bugged with problems with rampant reports of failures to log in.

The government hasn't released numbers of those who have successfully signed up for insurance, but the site was taken down over the weekend to fix the problems.

Tea party Republicans in the House and Senate have led the effort to tie a budget bill to funding for Obamacare, and the government has been shut down since Oct. 1 over the impasse.

"In medicine, we sometimes talk about the compression of morbidities, how the ravages of time and multiple maladies may overwhelm the patient at the end of life," Carson and Burgess say. "That compression sequence also seems to describe afflictions of the Affordable Care Act as it careens towards implementation."

Sunday, October 6, 2013

New Tower of Babel

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

Deficits/Surpluses From 1940 Until 2013

 Deficits/Surpluses From 1940 Until 2013 (*fiscal years)

1* - Presidential control
2* - Senate control
3* - House control

D = Democrat R = Republican


YearNominal DollarsInflation Adjusted1*2*3*
1940$2.9 Billion Deficit$48.33 Billion DeficitDDD
1941$4.9 Billion Deficit$77.78 Billion DeficitDDD
1942$20.5 Billion Deficit$292.86 Billion DeficitDDD
1943$54.6 Billion Deficit$737.84 Billion DeficitDDD
1944$47.6 Billion Deficit$634.67 Billion DeficitDDD
1945$47.6 Billion Deficit$618.18 Billion DeficitDDD
1946$15.9 Billion Deficit$191.57 Billion DeficitDDD
1947$4 Billion Surplus$42.11 Billion SurplusDRR
1948$11.8 Billion Surplus$114.56 Billion SurplusDRR
1949$0.6 Billion Surplus$5.88 Billion SurplusDDD
1950$3.1 Billion Deficit$30.1 Billion DeficitDDD
1951$6.1 Billion Surplus$54.95 Billion SurplusDDD
1952$1.5 Billion Deficit$13.27 Billion DeficitDDD
1953$6.5 Billion Deficit$57.02 Billion DeficitRRD
1954$1.2 Billion Deficit$10.43 Billion DeficitRRD
1955$3 Billion Deficit$26.09 Billion DeficitRDD
1956$3.9 Billion Surplus$33.62 Billion SurplusRDD
1957$3.4 Billion Surplus$28.33 Billion SurplusRDD
1958$2.8 Billion Deficit$22.58 Billion DeficitRDD
1959$12.8 Billion Deficit$103.23 Billion DeficitRDD
1960$0.3 Billion Surplus$2.36 Billion SurplusRDD
1961$3.3 Billion Deficit$25.78 Billion DeficitDDD
1962$7.1 Billion Deficit$55.04 Billion DeficitDDD
1963$4.8 Billion Deficit$36.64 Billion DeficitDDD
1964$5.9 Billion Deficit$44.36 Billion DeficitDDD
1965$1.4 Billion Deficit$10.37 Billion DeficitDDD
1966$3.7 Billion Deficit$26.62 Billion DeficitDDD
1967$8.6 Billion Deficit$60.14 Billion DeficitDDD
1968$25.2 Billion Deficit$169.13 Billion DeficitDDD
1969$3.2 Billion Surplus$20.38 Billion SurplusRDD
1970$2.8 Billion Deficit$16.87 Billion DeficitRDD
1971$23 Billion Deficit$132.95 Billion DeficitRDD
1972$23.4 Billion Deficit$130.73 Billion DeficitRDD
1973$14.9 Billion Deficit$78.42 Billion DeficitRDD
1974$6.1 Billion Deficit$28.91 Billion DeficitRDD
1975$53.2 Billion Deficit$231.3 Billion DeficitRDD
1976$73.7 Billion Deficit$303.29 Billion DeficitRDD
1977$53.7 Billion Deficit$207.34 Billion DeficitDDD
1978$59.2 Billion Deficit$212.19 Billion DeficitDDD
1979$40.7 Billion Deficit$130.87 Billion DeficitDDD
1980$73.8 Billion Deficit$209.66 Billion DeficitDDD
1981$79 Billion Deficit$203.08 Billion DeficitRRD
1982$128 Billion Deficit$309.93 Billion DeficitRRD
1983$207.8 Billion Deficit$487.79 Billion DeficitRRD
1984$185.4 Billion Deficit$417.57 Billion DeficitRRD
1985$212.3 Billion Deficit$461.52 Billion DeficitRRD
1986$221.2 Billion Deficit$471.64 Billion DeficitRRD
1987$149.7 Billion Deficit$308.02 Billion DeficitRDD
1988$155.2 Billion Deficit$306.72 Billion DeficitRDD
1989$152.5 Billion Deficit$287.74 Billion DeficitRDD
1990$221.2 Billion Deficit$395.71 Billion DeficitRDD
1991$269.3 Billion Deficit$461.92 Billion DeficitRDD
1992$290.4 Billion Deficit$484 Billion DeficitRDD
1993$255.1 Billion Deficit$412.78 Billion DeficitDDD
1994$203.2 Billion Deficit$320.5 Billion DeficitDDD
1995$164 Billion Deficit$251.53 Billion DeficitDRR
1996$107.5 Billion Deficit$160.21 Billion DeficitDRR
1997$22 Billion Deficit$32.07 Billion DeficitDRR
1998$69.2 Billion Surplus$99.28 Billion SurplusDRR
1999$125.6 Billion Surplus$176.16 Billion SurplusDRR
2000$236.4 Billion Surplus$320.76 Billion SurplusDRR
2001$127.3 Billion Surplus$168.16 Billion SurplusRDR
2002$157.8 Billion Deficit$205.2 Billion DeficitRDR
2003$377.6 Billion Deficit$479.8 Billion DeficitRRR
2004$413 Billion Deficit$511.14 Billion DeficitRRR
2005$318 Billion Deficit$380.84 Billion DeficitRRR
2006$248 Billion Deficit$287.7 Billion DeficitRRR
2007$161 Billion Deficit$181.51 Billion DeficitRDD
2008$459 Billion Deficit$498.37 Billion DeficitRDD
2009$1413 Billion Deficit$1539.22 Billion DeficitDDD
2010$1294 Billion Deficit$1386.92 Billion DeficitDDD
2011$1299 Billion Deficit$1350.31 Billion DeficitDDR
2012$1100 Billion Deficit$1120.16 Billion DeficitDDR
2013$759 Billion Deficit$759 Billion DeficitDDR

CartoonsDemsRinos