SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A wildfire in California
wine country that may have been caused by a high-voltage transmission
line called into question Pacific Gas & Electric’s strategy of
selectively cutting off power in windy weather to prevent blazes and
could force it to resort to even bigger blackouts affecting millions as
early as this weekend.
The repeated
shut-offs and the prospect of longer and more widespread ones brought
anger down on the utility from the governor and ordinary customers.
“We
will hold them to account,” warned Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has
repeatedly blasted PG&E — the nation’s largest utility — for what he
calls years of mismanagement and underinvestment that have left its
grid less resilient.
Twice
over the past two weeks, PG&E has cut power to large areas of
northern and central California to reduce the risk of its equipment
sparking fires. Nearly 2 million people lost electricity earlier this
month, and then as many as a half-million this week.
But
PG&E’s decision to shut down distribution lines but not
long-distance transmission lines may have backfired this time when a blaze erupted near the Sonoma County wine country town of Geyserville.
The
fire burned at least 49 buildings and 34 square miles (65 square
kilometers) and prompted evacuation orders for some 2,000 people. No
serious injuries were reported.
PG&E said a live, 230,000-volt transmission
line near Geyserville had malfunctioned minutes before the fire erupted
Wednesday night, and a broken “jumper” wire was found on a transmission
tower.
PG&E Corp. CEO Bill Johnson said
it was too soon to say whether the faulty equipment sparked the fire.
He said the tower had been inspected four times in the past two years
and appeared to have been in excellent condition.
But PG&E stock plummeted 31 percent on the news. And the blaze could mean wider blackouts ahead.
“It’s
kind of a logical next step to say, ‘Well, if our high-voltage
transmission lines are at risk, we’ve got to shut those down too,’” said
Alan Scheller-Wolf, professor of operations management and an energy
expert at Carnegie Mellon University.
PG&E, he said, “can’t win.”
The utility acknowledged that the discovery of the tower malfunction already had prompted a change in its strategy.
“We
have revisited and adjusted some of our standards and protocols in
determining when we will de-energize high-voltage transmission lines,”
Andrew Vesey, CEO of Pacific Gas & Electric Co., said at a briefing
Friday night.
With dangerously high winds in
the forecast this weekend, the utility said it is planning another
major shutdown that could hit more than 2 million people throughout the
region starting Saturday afternoon and last up to two days.
The
preparations came as firefighters simultaneously battled flames in both
Northern and Southern California: the fire amid Sonoma County’s
vineyards, and a wind-whipped blaze that destroyed at least six homes in
the Santa Clarita area near Los Angeles and led to evacuation orders
covering an estimated 50,000 people.
The
possible link between the wine country fire and a PG&E transmission
line contained grim parallels to the catastrophic fire last year that
tore through the town of Paradise, killing 85 people and destroying
thousands of homes in the deadliest U.S. fire in a century. State
officials concluded that fire was sparked by a PG&E transmission
line.
The line that failed this week is
newer and should have been more robust, said Michael Wara, director of
the climate and energy program at Stanford University. Its failure will
probably make PG&E more cautious, which means more widespread
blackouts, he said.
“There’s going to be more collateral damage,” Wara said.
Turning
off big transmission lines reduces the stability of the electrical
grid, leading to bigger outages, Wara said. Transmissions lines also
take longer to re-energize because everything connected to them must be
inspected, he said.
PG&E’s CEO has said it will take about a decade before widespread outages aren’t necessary.
Minimizing
blackouts will require PG&E to harden its grid with stronger poles
and newer equipment less likely to fall or spark. Cameras, weather
sensors and a more segmented grid would allow the company to target
blackouts to areas in the most danger.
PG&E
began resorting to large-scale shut-offs after its equipment was blamed
for several blazes in recent years that killed scores of people, burned
thousands of homes and ran up billions of dollars in claims that drove
the utility into bankruptcy, where it is still trying to put its
finances in order.
The repeated and
sometimes lengthy blackouts have frustrated Californians contending with
uncertainty, spoiled food and disrupted plans. Many have complained
about poor communication from the power company.
“I feel like we’re being held hostage for their failings and their incompetence,” said Logan Martin, 55, of Santa Rosa.
This
year’s fire season in California has so far been mild, with fewer
deaths and fewer acres burned following two years of deadly
conflagrations.
Experts say it is impossible
to know how much the blackouts contributed to that, but PG&E has
cited numerous instances of wind damage to its equipment that it said
could have caused fires if the lines had been electrified.
Losing
power doesn’t put a huge burden on firefighters, but they need to know
outages are coming so they can install generators where needed, such as
pumps for retardant, said Thom Porter, chief of the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
Firefighters
sometimes draw water from rural water systems that use electrical
pumps, but there have been no reports of problems getting water to fight
either of the major blazes burning in California now.
___
This story has been corrected to show that nearly 2 million people lost electricity earlier this month, not 2.5 million.
___
Cooper
reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writers Jocelyn Gecker and
Juliet Williams in San Francisco and Stefanie Dazio in Los Angeles
contributed.
No comments:
Post a Comment