Barr asks US Attorney John Bash to review 'unmasking' before and after 2016 election, DOJ tells Fox News
Attorney General William Barr, left, has asked U.S. Attorney John
Bash to review "unmasking" before and after the 2016 election.
(File)
Attorney General Bill Barr
has asked U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas John Bash to
review the practice of "unmasking" before and after the 2016
presidential election, a controversy that has picked up steam after the Justice Department moved to drop charges against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, the DOJ told Fox News on Wednesday night. Republican
lawmakers have demanded more information about the extent of the
practice after a previously clandestine list of Obama-era officials who
sought to reveal what turned out to be the identity of Michael Flynn in
intelligence reports was released earlier the month. The DOJ had moved
to drop the Flynn case after internal memos were released raising
serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to his
late-2017 guilty plea for lying to the FBI about his Russia contacts. DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec told Fox News' "Hannity"
that U.S. Attorney John Durham, who has been reviewing the origins of
the Russia investigation, was looking into "unmasking" but Barr
determined certain aspects of the practice needed further review, and
Bash has been assigned to do so.
"Unmasking inherently isn't wrong,
but certainly, the frequency, the motivation and the reasoning behind
unmasking can be problematic, and when you're looking at unmasking as
part of a broader investigation -- like John Durham's investigation --
looking specifically at who was unmasking whom, can add a lot to our
understanding about motivation and big picture events," Kupec said.
Unmasking
is a tool frequently used during the course of intelligence work
and occurs after U.S. citizens' conversations are incidentally picked up
in conversations with foreign officials who are being monitored by the
intelligence community. The U.S. citizens' identities are supposed to be
protected if their participation is incidental and no wrongdoing is
suspected. However, officials can determine the U.S. citizens' names
through a process that is supposed to safeguard their rights. In the
typical process, when officials are requesting the unmasking of an
American, they do not necessarily know the identity of the person in
advance. Republicans
became highly suspicious of the number of unmasking requests made by
the Obama administration concerning Flynn, and have questioned whether
other Trump associates were singled out. The DOJ spokesperson also
affirmed that the D.C. Court of Appeals has invited the DOJ to weigh in
on the Flynn case, "and we will." Kupec
maintained that the DOJ had the ability to drop the case against
Flynn. "We have the prosecutorial discretion to make that decision." Fox News' Brooke Singman and Gillian Turner contributed to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment