PORTLAND,
Ore. (AP) — Federal officers’ actions at protests in Oregon’s largest
city, hailed by President Donald Trump but done without local consent,
are raising the prospect of a constitutional crisis — one that could
escalate as weeks of demonstrations find renewed focus in clashes with
camouflaged, unidentified agents outside Portland’s U.S. courthouse.
State
and local authorities, who didn’t ask for federal help, are awaiting a
ruling in a lawsuit filed late last week. State Attorney General Ellen
Rosenblum said in court papers that masked federal officers have
arrested people on the street, far from the courthouse, with no probable
cause and whisked them away in unmarked cars.
Trump says he plans to send federal agents to other cities, too.
“We’re
going to have more federal law enforcement, that I can tell you,” Trump
said Monday. “In Portland, they’ve done a fantastic job. They’ve been
there three days, and they really have done a fantastic job in a very
short period of time.”
Constitutional
law experts said federal officers’ actions in the progressive city are a
“red flag” in what could become a test case of states’ rights as the
Trump administration expands federal policing.
“The
idea that there’s a threat to a federal courthouse and the federal
authorities are going to swoop in and do whatever they want to do
without any cooperation and coordination with state and local
authorities is extraordinary outside the context of a civil war,” said Michael Dorf, a professor of constitutional law at Cornell University.
“It
is a standard move of authoritarians to use the pretext of quelling
violence to bring in force, thereby prompting a violent response and
then bootstrapping the initial use of force in the first place,” Dorf
said.
The
Chicago Tribune, citing anonymous sources, reported Monday that Trump
planned to deploy 150 federal agents to Chicago. The ACLU of Oregon has
sued in federal court over the agents’ presence in Portland, and the
organization’s Chicago branch said it would similarly oppose a federal
presence.
“This
is a democracy, not a dictatorship,” Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, a
Democrat, said on Twitter. “We cannot have secret police abducting
people in unmarked vehicles. I can’t believe I have to say that to the
President of the United States.”
The
Department of Homeland Security tweeted that federal agents were
barricaded in Portland’s U.S. courthouse at one point and had lasers
pointed at their eyes in an attempt to blind them.
“Portland
is rife with violent anarchists assaulting federal officers and federal
buildings,” the tweet said. “This isn’t a peaceful crowd. These are
federal crimes.”
Top
leaders in the U.S. House said Sunday that they were “alarmed” by the
Trump administration’s tactics in Portland and other cities. They have
called on federal inspectors general to investigate.
Trump,
who’s called the protesters “anarchists and agitators,” said the DHS
and Justice Department agents are on hand to restore order at the
courthouse and help Portland.
Nightly protests, which began after George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, have devolved into violence.
The
Trump administration’s actions run counter to the usual philosophies of
American conservatives, who typically treat state and local rights with
great sanctity and have long been deeply wary of the federal government
— particularly its armed agents — interceding in most situations.
But
Trump has shown that his actions don’t always reflect traditional
conservatism — particularly when politics, and in this case an impending
election, are in play.
One
prominent Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who is from the
libertarian-leaning flank of the party, criticized federal policing.
“We
cannot give up liberty for security. Local law enforcement can and
should be handling these situations in our cities but there is no place
for federal troops or unidentified federal agents rounding people up at
will,” Paul said in a tweet Monday.
The
protests have roiled Portland for 52 nights. Many rallies have
attracted thousands and been largely peaceful. But smaller groups of up
to several hundred people have focused on federal property and local law
enforcement buildings, at times setting fires to police precincts,
smashing windows and clashing violently with local police.
Portland
police used tear gas on multiple occasions until a federal court order
banned its officers from doing so without declaring a riot. Now, concern
is growing that the tear gas is being used against demonstrators by
federal officers instead.
Anger
at the federal presence escalated on July 11, when a protester was
hospitalized with critical injuries after a U.S. Marshals Service
officer struck him in the head with a less-lethal round. Video shows the
man, identified as Donavan LaBella, standing across the street from the
officers holding a speaker over his head when he was hit.
Court
documents filed in cases against protesters show that federal officers
have posted lookouts on the upper stories of the courthouse and have
plainclothes officers circulating in the crowd. Court papers in a
federal case against a man accused of shining a laser in the eyes of
Federal Protective Service agents show that Portland police turned him
over to U.S. authorities after federal officers identified him.
Mayor
Ted Wheeler, who’s has been under fire for his handling of the
protests, said on national TV talk shows Sunday that the demonstrations
were dwindling before federal officers engaged.
“They
are sharply escalating the situation. Their presence here is actually
leading to more violence and more vandalism. And it’s not helping the
situation at all,” Wheeler said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Full Coverage: Racial injustice
“They’re not wanted here. We haven’t asked them here,” Wheeler said. “In fact, we want them to leave.”
Indeed,
crowds of demonstrators had begun to dwindle a week ago, and some in
the liberal city — including Black community leaders — had begun to call
for the nightly demonstrations to end.
But
by the weekend, the presence of federal troops and Trump’s repeated
references to Portland as a hotbed of “anarchists” seemed to give a new
life to the protests and attract a broader base.
On
Sunday night, a crowd estimated at more than 500 people gathered
outside the courthouse, including dozens of self-described “moms” who
linked arms in front of a chain-link fence outside the courthouse. The
demonstration continued into Monday morning.
“It seems clear that there were at least some federal crimes committed here,” said Steve Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas.
No comments:
Post a Comment