In
this Aug. 6, 2020 file photo, New York State Attorney General Letitia
James takes a question at a news conference in New York. The Office of
the New York Attorney General said in a new report, Thursday, May 6,
2021, that a campaign funded by the broadband industry submitted
millions of fake comments supporting the 2017 repeal of net neutrality.
(AP Photo/Kathy Willens, File)
New York Attorney General Letitia James has uncovered a massive
lobbying scheme attempting to undermine net neutrality regulations put
in place in 2015. While the leader behind the scheme is currently
unknown, the plan ultimately led computers to generate millions of
comments being filed with the FCC by outside firms.
Six firms funded by internet providers reportedly generated fake
comments using real people’s identities in order to advance the
interests of those same internet providers. This practice is known as
astroturf lobbying. Millions of fake accounts posing as real people,
otherwise known as bots, can easily be created off of a single computer.
The whole scheme was allegedly directed at influencing the FCC to
repeal net neutrality regulations put in place by the Obama
Administration in order to keep providers from decreasing speed or
increasing prices for certain websites over others.
Opponents of net neutrality argue that without the provision,
internet providers could increase prices for large bandwidth platforms
like Netflix and even make other platforms like Facebook and Google,
free. Opponents also argue less regulation would essentially increase
development and investment in the internet industry, allowing providers
to develop technologies like 5G a lot faster.
Regardless of which side people fall on when it comes to the issue of
net neutrality, the New York Attorney General’s investigation found
foul play by large internet service providers. In fact, of the 22
million comments posted to the FCC, 80 percent of those comments were
fraudulent bots using real people’s identities.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who headed the committee in charge of
looking into rolling back net neutrality, received about 14,000 comments
that argued in favor of the internet service providers. This has since
uncovered an even bigger issue in American policy discussions,
especially ones that take place online.
As of now, this is one of the first major examples of a powerful
industry looking to sway public opinion to serve their interest. Leaving
the unanswered question: how many massive corporate industries are
conducting similar campaigns to shape the public’s perception of
reality?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment