Fat Ugly Democrat Party Woman?
Weasel Con Man ? House Speaker Mike Johnson demanded Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recall Ukraine's US ambassador in a sharply worded letter made public Wednesday.
The incident Speaker Johnson refers to was a visit to a US munitions factory in Scranton, Pennsylvania. The factory makes 155mm artillery ammunition used by the Ukrainian Army. Zelensky took the occasion not only to thank the workers for their diligence and acknowledge the vital work they are doing but to criticize statements made by Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance on how to end the war in Ukraine (the criticism was on point but the thought process behind the statement was definitely suboptimal). Adding to the aura that Zelensky was campaigning for Kamala Harris on American soil were the fact that:
The media tried to run interference for the visit with a healthy helping of "bothsidesism." For instance, "Zelensky’s visit to Pennsylvania mirrors a trip to Utah in July, where he met with Republican Gov. Spencer Cox and signed a memorandum of understanding with state leaders. In both cases, state leaders expressed support for Ukraine in its battle against Russia." Not to belabor the obvious, but Utah is not a swing state, the governor is not a Trump surrogate, and that visit was not 40 days out from a presidential election. The immediate effect of the kerfuffle is that neither former President Trump nor Speaker Johnson plans to meet with Zelensky while he's in the US (Republicans follow Trump’s lead of icing out Zelensky | CNN Politics). For good measure, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman, Kentucky Republican James Comer, has opened an investigation into the whole affair; see Republicans Would Kindly Like Some Answers About the Legality of Zelensky's Visit to PA – RedState.
I'm not a huge Comer fan, but this is definitely a sauce-for-the-goose-is-sauce-for-the-gander moment; see What the Biden-Harris Administration Just Did With Ukraine's Zelensky Should Be Impeachable – RedState. If Trump could be impeached for attempting to protect Ukrainian prosecutors investigating Biden Crime Family corruption in Ukraine, Harris should get the same treatment for using a foreign nation to meddle in a US election. Legendary French Diplomat Charles Talleyrand is supposed to have said, "C'est pire qu'un crime, c'est une faute." It was worse than a crime; it was a blunder. That is certainly the case here. For the last two years, a large part of the English-speaking (though not necessarily American) pro-Ukrainian crowd on social media has struggled to change support for Ukraine with fairly deep bipartisan support in Congress and with the public into a partisan political issue with the Democrats staged as the supporters of Ukraine. So much so that when this war winds down, I plan on blocking 99.9% of the sources I use for Ukraine news on "X," formerly Twitter. It is hard to conceive of a more stupid and pig-headed position unless it is the alleged conservatives who keep claiming Russia's invasion was justified, a point of view that is totally at odds with reality and implausible to anyone not six sigmas to the left of the center of an IQ Bell Curve. Somehow, Zelensky either allowed himself to be roped into a "Great Idea," or he's internalized the leftist talking point Ukraine's independence is a Democrat issue. As the war enters a critical phase next year with Trump almost certainly back in the White House, Zelensky has effectively burned critical bridges he will need at the negotiating table and on the battlefield. Speaker Johnson is correct. The Ukrainian ambassador either knowingly or unknowingly embroiled her president and her nation's struggle for self-determination in a US presidential campaign on the side of the probable loser. Zelensky should take the "L," fire his ambassador, apologize, and get Hillary Clinton to make him a huge red button labeled "RESET." |
No comments:
Post a Comment