Jonathan Turley Rips Biden's Pardon of His Son to Shreds

George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley has now weighed in on the sweeping pardon that Joe Biden just gave his son on Sunday. It not only covers the crimes for which he was convicted or to which he pled guilty, but it also covers any other possible crimes that may have occurred over 11 years from Jan. 1, 2014, to Dec. 1, 2024. 

Turley just eviscerated Biden when he was asked about it by Fox News and the "bad precedent" that Biden could be setting. 

Turley pointed out how this brings to mind the actions of Bill Clinton, who pardoned his brother. 

"It also shows a degree of contempt for the American people," Turley observed. Biden "didn't just simply lie about not ever speaking to his son's business associates, of never being in meetings with them. He lied repeatedly to the American people when he was a candidate for reelection."

Turley expanded on that on X.

Joe Biden: “I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision."  Americans may have a more difficult time understanding how a president could repeatedly and adamantly deny that he would issue this pardon when he was running for reelection.

Turley continued:

That is precisely the type of sweeping immunity grant that the federal judge balked at in the hearing when the earlier sweetheart deal feel apart. The judge asked the prosecutor if he had ever seen such a deal and he admitted that he had not

Hunter Biden is hardly the poster child for a victim of over-enforcement of federal laws. He was given a free pass on allegations that he was an unregistered agent and was the personification of influence peddling in Washington

Turley also pointed to the NBC report that Biden was discussing pardoning Hunter back in June with his aides while still denying he was ever going to do it. 

According to NBC:

The president has discussed pardoning his son with some of his closest aides at least since Hunter Biden’s conviction in June, said two people with direct knowledge of the discussions about the matter. They said it was decided at the time that he would publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.

In other words, it was a conscious decision to hoodwink the public and even those "in the know" are admitting it. He knew it could hurt his reelection chances, so they decided he would simply say something different than what was happening behind the scenes. 

That's truly vile. Talk about contempt for the American people. Turley is right on the money with that. 

This is what they think of us, and we should never forget it.