![]() |
| White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during the daily
briefing in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington,
DC, on March 17, 2025. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that the FBI is now investigating who leaked “inaccurate” information on the damage done to Iranian nuclear facilities to CNN. CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand claimed to have obtained an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) that stated the U.S.’ recent bombings of three nuclear facilities only set back Iran’s nuclear program back by a “few months.” Bertrand is a Pentagon correspondent for CNN, covering national security. However, Trump explained to NBC News’ Kelly O’Donnell that the recent DIA report on the destruction of the nuclear sites had been incomplete, since the details were still in their early stages when whoever stole them released it to the press. Trump also maintained that the informants did not properly assess all the damage done by the involved B-2 bombers. In addition, on Wednesday, Leavitt appeared on Fox News’ “America Reports” program, where she asserted that the FBI has launched an investigation into who leaked a “top secret intelligence analysis” to the news outlet.
Soon after, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also accused the left-leaning news outlet of trying to “spin” the narrative of the GOP administration’s attack on Iran in an attempt to “hurt” Trump — like they always seem to do.
CNN then issued a statement in response to the administration’s warning, emphasizing that the company backs their reporter — while also arguing that it is not “reasonable” to fault their journalists “for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment.” Analysts say that the leak most likely originated from a relatively low‑level intelligence employee, a “paper‑pusher” within the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The disruption stemmed from a single-day snapshot lacking coordination with other intelligence agencies, making the leak appear opportunistic, rather than whistleblowing. |

No comments:
Post a Comment