The Details of This Lawsuit Against Kyrsten Sinema Are Wild
Former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema
(I-AZ) is used to the limelight as a public official. But now, she’s
going to have some very embarrassing weeks ahead as she’s being sued for
breaking up the 14-year marriage of her former bodyguard, Matthew
Ammel.
The ex-wife of Mr. Ammel, Heather, is filed an “alienation of
affection” lawsuit against Sinema and is seeking $25,000 compensation,
essentially claiming her pervasive licentious antics led to the
destruction of their marriage with Mr. Ammel with whom she shares three
children. There’s allegations of ecstasy use, and Matthew Ammel isn’t
the only person Sinema has relations with; she reportedly went down the
line of her security team (via NYT):
Former Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, the Democrat
turned independent who served one term before leaving office last year,
was accused in federal court this week of conducting an affair with a
member of her Senate security team, a married father of three.
In a
complaint filed in North Carolina, the ex-wife of Matthew Ammel, who
worked on Ms. Sinema’s staff for two years, accused the former senator
of seducing him and breaking up their marriage.
Heather Ammel
claimed in her suit that Ms. Sinema sent Mr. Ammel sexually suggestive
photographs on Signal, the encrypted messaging app; chose him to
accompany her on trips to Napa Valley and to the Sphere, an events
venue, in Las Vegas; paid for him to enter psychedelic treatment for
post-traumatic stress disorder and other issues; encouraged him to bring
drugs on work trips so she could guide him through a psychedelic trip;
showered him with gifts and concert tickets; and eventually entered into
a sexual relationship with him that caused him to leave his family.
[…]
Ms.
Ammel is seeking more than $25,000 from Ms. Sinema, claiming she
intentionally and maliciously broke up her marriage through “willful and
wanton conduct.”
Ms. Ammel’s suit was originally filed in
September in state court in North Carolina, where a person can sue for
“alienation of affection” and demand damages. This week, Ms. Sinema’s
attorney asked that the suit be moved to federal court.
During her
single term in the Senate, Ms. Sinema alienated Democratic voters in
her state, as well many of her colleagues, who viewed her as the most
significant impediment to Democratic priorities, such as closing the
so-called carried interest loophole and overturning the filibuster. She
defended her position on maintaining the filibuster as one that
encouraged compromise over partisan politics.
Sinema’s camp and legal team did not reply for comment. But to thread
this alienation lawsuit with a swipe over Sinema doing the same with
her constituents is ridiculous. Just report on the craziness of this
lawsuit. The two things are not the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment