The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold
Biden's Token Black DEI.
Things don’t look good for the
Trump administration on the birthright citizenship case. There seems to
be a strong majority skeptical of their challenge to the legal idea,
even though one might argue that the Founders never envisioned millions
of people crossing our border without wanting to assimilate, breeding
like rabbits to claim many benefits paid for by us taxpayers.
How can someone, for example, meet the domicile benchmark when
existing law states that those entering the US illegally can be deported
if caught by the police?
When Justice Gorsuch questioned if the
government was citing Roman law, it was not the best start, but at
least that wing of the court was going off precedent or inquiring about
it through the Constitution. Yet Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s example
was, well, incoherent. It did provide some grade-A reactions, though:
— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeaceful) April 1, 2026
Ending
birthright citizenship for illegal aliens would remove one of the
largest drivers of illegal immigration to our country. Without the shiny
object of birth tourism, you would see it end almost overnight.
Democrats are freaking out about this— because they not only want…
ACLU
Attorney Cecillia Wang argues that any newborn child, regardless of
their parents' legal status and allegiance to foreign nations, even
adversaries like Iran, should be granted citizenship without regard to
said allegiance.
We
fought a Civil War so we can mail U.S. election ballots and Social
Security checks to 1.5 million Chinese nationals with birthright
citizenship living in Beijing.
No comments:
Post a Comment