Democrat SOS and Media Blast CO Gov. Polis for Tina Peters' Commutation; Hear How He Sets Them Straight
After Colorado Governor Jared Polis' limited commutation of the
nine-year sentence for former Mesa County, Colorado, Clerk Tina Peters,
he has been blasted nonstop by Democrats, left-leaning journalists, and
legacy media outlets. Peters became a lightning rod for election
integrity advocates and judicial reformists over her 2024 conviction for
election interference and attempting to influence a public official
when she exposed voting information from a Dominion machine.
Polis
considered her nine-year sentence to be unusually punitive, particularly
in light of Sonja Jaquez Lewis, a former Democrat state senator, whose
2024 criminal indictment was in the same category as Peters'.
Jaquez Lewis' indictment included four felonies: making
three false statements to four public officials. Not only were these
charges combined from three false statements to one, but Jaquez Lewis
was sentenced to two years of supervised probation, 150 hours of
community service, and a fine.
Not exactly justice equally applied. Polis outlined this reasoning in Peters' letter of clemency.
However, this is an extremely unusual and lengthy sentence for a first time offender who committed nonviolent crimes.
I
agree with the principle highlighted by the Colorado Court of Appeals
in your case that, “...the First Amendment generally prohibits punishing
someone for their protected speech. ‘[A] court may not punish an
individual by imposing a heavier sentence for the exercise of [F]irst
[A]mendment rights. . . . A sentence based to any degree on activity or
beliefs protected by the [F]irst [A]mendment is constitutionally
invalid.’”
Further I agree, in this case, “[T]he trial court’s
comments about Peters’s belief in the existence of 2020 election fraud
went beyond relevant considerations for her sentencing. Her offense was
not her belief, however misguided the trial court deemed it to be, in
the existence of such election fraud; it was her deceitful actions in
her attempt to gather evidence of such fraud.
Indeed, under these
circumstances, just as her purported beliefs underlying her motive for
her actions were not relevant to her defense, the trial court should not
have considered those beliefs relevant when imposing sentence.”
Polis
did a video explaining how and why he made his choice to cut Peters'
sentence in half from almost nine years to four-and-a-half. In his
interviews with legacy media, Polis continued to emphasize this point,
despite legacy media's obsession with making it about President Donald
Trump and 2020 election denialism.
When Polis appeared on CNN, host Kaitlan Collins
tried to steer him
in that direction to further give credence to this tired narrative.
Surprisingly, Polis did not play ball.
POLIS:
Thousands of people, of course, have weighed in, people called my
office, some incorrectly thought she didn't commit a crime, as the
president did, thought she should be pardoned — we're going to fight the
president's illegal pardon in court. Some like me thought she was
guilty, should have had a slightly lower sentence. Others wanted her to
stay there for a long time and fundamentally misunderstood the crime.
Thought it had something to do with the 2020 election or election
conspiracy around Trump and Biden, when the crime had zero to do with
that.
COLLINS: You don't think its.. its.. had Trump not disputed
the 2020 election, had Mike Lindell not become this famous figure on TV
disputing the election results in 2020, that what happened in 2021 in
Mesa County would have happened?
POLIS: Well, to be clear: this
was the clerk that certified the 2020 election results. There was not an
issue there. There were some issues around her competency [COLLINS
interrupts] This was a municipal election —
COLLINS: I'm just
asking, if you don't think that what happened in 2020... you don't think
this would have happened? You just think that those are totally
separate? That this would have occurred even if the president, if that
never happened in 2020 with a major election dispute, pressure on the
Vice President, and on state election officials, from Georgia to
Colorado to wherever, on that. You don't think that would have happened?
POLIS:
You'd have to have her on to talk about her motivation. Do I think that
she was egged on or encouraged in her illegal acts by people like Mike
Lindell, or perhaps, even, the President of the United States, it's
certainly conjecture, but it's certainly possible. I don't know how she
came to hold her beliefs. I certainly believe that there are incorrect,
dangerous beliefs that are held in certain circles in our country.
Ultimately
it's a matter of free speech until you cross the line and violate the
law, which she did. And that's why she committed the crime and she
should do the crime with a sentence that's tough and fair. That's why
she'll... her sentence has been adjusted to four-and-a-half years, which
is a very severe sentence for what she did. When again, another public
official in Colorado got probation only for one of these acts of felony
and three other felonies.
No comments:
Post a Comment