![]() |
The Supreme Court delivered a major blow to Democrats in their last-ditch effort to implement a gerrymandered map that would have given them a 10-1 advantage. The Court rejected a motion filed by Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones seeking to overturn the state Supreme Court's decision invalidating the map for violations of the state constitution. Questions about when election day begins were the basis for bringing this case into federal court, as it concerns a state court ruling on a state constitutional issue. It was a last attempt—and it failed. The application for a stay was officially denied by Chief Justice John Roberts this afternoon. It was a laughable motion, and we’re glad the court agreed. Democrats really are currently in the depths of hell with this redistricting fight The
Supreme Court on Friday turned away a long-shot effort by Virginia
Democrats to revive a new, voter-approved congressional map they wanted
to use in this year’s midterm elections.
Most legal experts considered it DOA upon filing. The Virginia Supreme Court's rejection caused a meltdown among Democrats, some of whom toyed with the idea of drastically changing the Supreme Court by lowering the retirement age to 54, invalidating the fair districting amendment they supported, and passing any map they wanted. Fortunately, Gov. Abigail Spanberger
and other Virginia Democratic leaders dismissed those ideas. And like clockwork, we're back to court packing hysterics and Gov. Abigail Spanberger outright lying here. You violated the state constitution, lady. Learn how things work first: |


No comments:
Post a Comment