Senate Democrats blocked legislation Monday that would have rolled
back President Obama's executive actions on immigration in exchange for
funding the Department of Homeland Security through September.
But soon after the early evening vote -- the fourth Senate attempt to
block Obama's controversial decision to grant work permits to millions
of illegal immigrants -- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.,
suggested separate legislation to combat Obama's executive actions.
"The new bill I described offers another option we can turn to. It's
another way to get the Senate unstuck from a Democrat filibuster and
move the debate forward," McConnell said on the Senate floor after a
vote to advance the House-passed bill failed 47-46, short of the 60
votes needed. Three previous attempts earlier in the month had yielded
similar results.
It was not clear whether McConnell's gambit would succeed ahead of
Friday's midnight deadline to fund the department or see it shut down.
It was far from certain whether it would win any Democratic support, and
House conservatives remain firmly opposed to any funding bill for the
Homeland Security Department that does not also overturn Obama's
executive actions on immigration.
If no funding deal is reached by the deadline, the DHS could
partially shut down, resulting in the furloughs of roughly 30,000 DHS
employees. About 200,000 others would continue to work, but they would
receive no pay until Congress authorizes funding.
It's a reality that was on display during the 16-day government-wide
shutdown in the fall of 2013, when national parks and monuments closed
but essential government functions kept running, albeit sometimes on
reduced staff.
Earlier in the day, Obama again warned that failing to act before Friday increases the risk of a domestic terror act.
At a White House gathering of governors, Obama accused Congress of
creating “self-inflicted” wounds and said failing to pass the funding
bill within the next several days “will have a direct impact on
America’s national security.” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson
appeared on all five Sunday talk shows to make a similar case.
The Tea Party Patriots group is suggesting that Senate Republicans
are backing down because they fear Americans will blame them for a
partial DHS shutdown.
“Senate Republicans are about to cave in to President Obama,” the
group said Monday. “It’s time … to ratchet up the pressure on wobbly
Senators.”
A federal district court judge in Texas last week temporarily blocked
the administration's plans to carry out an executive action that
protects millions of illegal immigrants from deportation.
The Justice Department on Monday asked a federal judge to lift the
judge’s temporary block and make a decision by Wednesday. If the judge
fails to rule in the administration’s favor, the department is expected
to turn to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, who leads the Senate committee that
oversees the DHS, was not calling Monday for the immigration provision
to be removed from the funding bill, but suggested that the courts, not
Congress, will resolve the issue.
“Now that the judiciary branch is involved, the courts ultimately
will decide the constitutionality of the administration’s ‘deferred
action’ memorandum,” he said.
Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald has admitted that he lied
about serving in the special operations forces in a conversation with a
homeless veteran that was caught on camera earlier this year.
McDonald made the claim in January while he was in Los Angeles as
part of the VA's effort to locate and house homeless veterans. During
the tour, a homeless man told McDonald that he had served in the special
operations forces.
"Special forces? What years?" McDonald responded. "I was in special forces." The exchange was broadcast on "The CBS Evening News" Jan. 30. McDonald's misstatement was first reported by The Huffington Post.
McDonald graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in
1975 and completed Army Ranger training before being assigned to the
82nd Airborne Division until his retirement in 1980. According to the
Huffington Post, while McDonald was formally recognized as a graduate of
Ranger School, he never actually served in a Ranger battalion or other
special operations unit.
"I have no excuse," the website quoted McDonald as saying in its report. "I was not in special forces."
In a statement released Monday by the VA, McDonald said: "While I was
in Los Angeles, engaging a homeless individual to determine his veteran
status, I asked the man where he had served in the military. He
responded that he had served in special forces. I incorrectly stated
that I had been in special forces. That was inaccurate and I apologize
to anyone that was offended by my misstatement."
McDonald told the Huffington Post that he had "reacted spontaneously and ... wrongly" in response to the homeless man's claim.
"As I thought about it later, I knew that this was wrong," McDonald said of his false statement.
The White House released a statement Monday evening saying that it had accepted McDonald's explanation.
"Secretary McDonald has apologized for the misstatement and noted
that he never intended to misrepresent his military service," the
statement said. "We take him at his word and expect that this will not
impact the important work he’s doing to promote the health and
well-being of our nation’s veterans."
After leaving the Army, McDonald went on to a successful corporate
career, eventually becoming Chairman, President, and CEO of Proctor
& Gamble. He became VA secretary this past July, as the agency was
dealing with the fallout from the scandal of long patient wait times at
VA hospitals.
Sen. John McCain says he's ashamed of the United States, President
Obama and himself for how America has failed to help Ukraine defend
itself from Russia.
"I'm ashamed of my country, I'm ashamed of my
president and I'm ashamed of myself, that I haven't done more to help
these people," the Arizona Republican and former presidential nominee,
who spent six years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, said on CBS' "Face
the Nation." "It is really, really heartbreaking."
McCain, who is
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, decried American and
European leaders' unwillingness to provide Ukrainians with weapons they
can use to stave off the Russian advance.
The senator predicted
that Russian President Vladimir Putin will pull back some, but said
Putin's next goal will be to establish a stronger land route into
Ukraine, a move that would allow for an easier attack on that country.
A top Obama administration official warned several times Sunday about
the potential, far-reaching perils of Congress allowing the Department
of Homeland Security to run out of funding in several days and got some
Republican support in the Capitol Hill stalemate.
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are in a standoff over
legislation that will fund the agency through late September but also
roll back President Obama's executive action on immigration.
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said allowing the agency to
lose its federal funding after Friday could jeopardize the U.S efforts
to thwart a domestic terror attack by the Islamic State and will result
in 30,000 employees being furloughed.
“It including people I depend on every day to stay one step ahead of" the Islamic State, he told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
He also appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and the three other major
Sunday shows, arguing that failing to reach a deal would go beyond
cutting off funding for the president’s efforts to defer deportation for
millions of illegal immigrants to include cuts to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency while parts of the country are still dealing with
severe winter weather.
The legislation has already been passed by the GOP-controlled House but is stalled in the Senate.
Johnson disagreed with the argument that Senate Democrats have
blocked the bill by filibustering, saying the problem is the legislation
should be presented “clean” of any immigration language.
“I’m talking to every member of Congress who will listen,” Johnson
told NBC. "It's absurd that we're even having this conversation about
Congress' inability to fund Homeland Security in these challenging
times."
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has suggested that the House pass a bill on which Senate Democrats can agree.
However, the leaders of the lower chamber have been steadfast for weeks about having already done their job.
Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, repeated
that message Sunday by saying in an email: "The House has acted to fund
the Homeland Security Department. Now it's time for Senate Democrats to
stop blocking legislation that would do the same."
GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina, and John McCain, Arizona,
said Sunday they would oppose linking the two issues in one bill.
Graham told ABC’s “This Week” that he was “willing and ready” to pass
a funding bill, then let the immigration issue play out in court.
Last week, a federal district court judge in Texas temporarily
blocked the administration's plans to protect immigrant parents of U.S.
citizens or legal permanent residents from deportation. The decision
came as part of a lawsuit filed by 26 states claiming Obama had
overstepping his authority in taking the executive action.
Johnson repeated Sunday that the administration will appeal the ruling.
Even if Congress fails to fund their agency, the remain roughly 200,000 Homeland Security employees would continue to work.
However, they would receive no pay until Congress authorizes funding.
It's a reality that was on display during the 16-day government-wide
shutdown in the fall of 2013, when national parks and monuments closed
but essential government functions kept running, albeit sometimes on
reduced staff.
Johnson on Sunday also linked the purported Mall of America warning
from the Africa-based al-Shabaab terror group and other recent terror
alerts to what he described as a "new phase" of challenges by extremist
groups abroad that have used alarming Internet videos and social media
to gain adherents in the U.S. and potentially prod some to action.
"This new phase is more complex, less centralized, more diffuse," he
said, adding: "It encourages independent actors who strike with very
little notice."
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said on Sunday that President
Obama’s decision not to say the actions of the Islamic State is a form
of “radical Islam” is at the behest of the Muslim community.
“The thing I hear from leaders in the Muslim community in this
country is ISIL is attempting to hijack my religion,” Johnson told “Fox
News Sunday,” referring to the terror group also known as Islamic State,
or ISIS.
Johnson said the leaders argue their religion is about peace and
brotherhood and “resent” that Islamic State is “attempting to hijack
that from us.”
Obama is facing sharp criticism, even from within his own party, for
instead using the term “violent extremism” to describe the actions of
ISIS and other terror groups that are based on a form of Islam.
“If we don’t identify our enemies, we cannot defeat them,” Rep. Tulsi
Gabbard, D-Hawaii, told Fox News on Wednesday. “Unless you accurately
identify who your enemy is, then you can’t come up with an effective
strategy, a winning strategy to defeat that enemy.”
Obama on the same day defended his choice of words by saying the term
"radical Islam" gives such groups religious legitimacy they don't
deserve.
“I want to be very clear about how I see it: Al Qaeda and ISIL and
groups like it are desperate for legitimacy. They try to portray
themselves as religious leaders, holy warriors in defense of Islam,” he
said. “We must never accept the premise they put forward.”
Johnson, who appeared on all of the major Sunday talk shows, also made a similar argument.
“To refer to ISIL as occupying any part of the Islamic theology is
playing on a battlefield that they would like us to be on,” he said. “I
think that to call them some form of Islam gives the group more dignity
than it deserves frankly. It is a terrorist organization.”
Johnson also said he was more focused on the potential for Islamic
State, with an estimated 30,000 fighters in Iraq and Syria, to recruit
Americans and inspire them to carry out terror acts.
“Whether it's referred to as Islamic extremism or violent extremism,
what it comes down to is ISIL is a terrorist organization that
represents a serious potential threat to our homeland, which has to be
addressed,” he said. “I’m more concerned about that frankly than I am
about what two words we use to refer to them.”
Johnson also supported some of the arguments put forth last week at a
White House summit on terror extremism including ones about having to
defeat Islamic State and other groups through social media.
In addition, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said, “We can't
kill our way out of this war. We need to go after the root causes that
lead people to join these groups -- the lack of opportunity and jobs
among them.''
Johnson said Sunday the U.S. is attempting to defeat terror groups “militarily” through an international coalition.
However, the U.S. must also use social media and get involved in
Muslim communities to thwart such groups' successful efforts to use the
Internet to recruit foreign fighters, he said.
“We need to be involved in the relevant communities in this country
to thwart their recruitment efforts and to help build the
counter-narrative to the one that is being put out by ISIL right now,"
Johnson said. ... "It does involve a whole of government approach.”
During his first visit to Afghanistan, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash
Carter said the U.S. is considering slowing its military exit from the
embattled country by keeping a larger troop presence in the country than
previously planned because the new Afghan government is proving to be a
more reliable partner.
President Obama plans to discuss a range of options for U.S. military
withdrawal when Afghan president Ashraf Ghani visits the White House in
March, Carter said at a news conference with Ghani. The two presidents
plan to “rethink” the counterterrorism right in Afghanistan, he said.
There are 10,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, down from 100,000 from
2011. Carter did not say Obama was considering keeping troops in the
country beyond 2016, but was only considering the pace of troop
withdrawal for the next two years.
While the White House recently acknowledged it was reconsidering the
exit plan, Carter's remarks were the most direct explanation by a
Pentagon official amid criticism from opposition Republicans that the
Democratic commander in chief is beating a hasty and risky retreat.
Ghani shad requested “some flexibility in the troop drawdown
timeline” in February. The day after the request, Gen. John Campbell, a
top U.S. commander in Afghanistan told the U.S. Senate Armed Services
Committee he had presented U.S. leaders with options that would allow
him to continue training and advising Afghan forces through the summer.
Carter said the new thinking about the mission in Afghanistan has to
do with the stabilized government in Afghanistan between Ashraf and
Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah. The unity offers new promise for a
more effective partnership in stabilizing the country, Carter said.
Ghani has made it clear he thinks a slowdown of troop withdrawal
would offer better support for Afghan forces battling the Taliban.
Obama’s current plan calls for troop levels to cut in half from 10,000
by the end of the year.
Carter lauded the progress that Afghanistan has made during the 13
years since U.S. forces invaded and toppled the Taliban rule. Obama's
goal, he said, is to "make sure this progress sticks" so that
Afghanistan does not again become a launching pad for terrorist attacks
on the U.S.
Carter also met in the Afghan capital with Campbell and Gen. Lloyd
Austin, the commander of U.S. Central Command, which has responsibility
for U.S. operations in Afghanistan and across the Middle East.
Far fewer veterans than expected are taking advantage of a new law
aimed at making it easier for them to get private health care and avoid
the long waits that have plagued Department of Veterans Affairs
facilities nationwide.
Only 27,000 veterans have made appointments for private medical care
since the VA started mailing out "Choice Cards" in November, the VA said
in a report to Congress this month. The number is so small, compared to
the 8.6 million cards that have been mailed out, that VA Secretary
Robert McDonald wants authority to redirect some of the $10 billion
Congress allocated for the program to boost care for veterans at the
VA's 970 hospitals and clinics.
Republicans and Democrats insist the problem is the department and
that it needs to do a better job promoting the choice program. They also
want to change a quirk in the law that makes it hard for some veterans
in rural areas to prove they live at least 40 miles from a VA health
site.
The government measures the distance as the crow flies, rather than by driving miles, leaving thousands of veterans ineligible.
"Veterans put their lives on the line to defend this country. The
very least we can do is ensure they don't have to jump through hoops to
receive the care they need and have earned," said Sen. Jon Tester,
D-Mont., whose vast state has just one VA hospital.
The choice program was a key component of last year's sweeping law
approved in response to reports that dozens of veterans died while
waiting for appointments at a VA hospital in Phoenix, and that
appointment records were manipulated to hide the delays. A series of
government reports said workers throughout the country falsified wait
lists while supervisors looked the other way, resulting in chronic
delays for veterans seeking care and bonuses for managers who falsely
appeared to meet on-time goals.
The law, signed by President Barack Obama in August, allows veterans
who have waited more than 30 days for an appointment to get VA-paid care
from a local doctor. It also allows veterans who live at least 40 miles
from a VA hospital or clinic to get private care and makes it easier to
fire VA employees accused of wrongdoing.
The choice program expands an existing program that allows veterans
to get outside care for emergencies or procedures not available at the
VA. Veterans have long complained about waiting months or even years to
be reimbursed for private care, and many are skeptical the choice card
will alleviate those problems, despite promises by the VA.
"I don't believe any of us thought that there would be a wholesale
rush to leave the VA system at all, but we are still early in the
program," Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Veterans
Affairs Committee, told reporters during a recent tour of the VA.
McDonald's bid to shift the money has met a bipartisan wall of
opposition in Congress, where leaders said the landmark law they adopted
last summer to overhaul VA has not been fully implemented. Taking money
away from the choice program just three months after it was launched is
premature, even irresponsible, lawmakers and veterans advocates said.
Miller called the plan a complete nonstarter. His Senate counterpart,
Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., called it unacceptable. And Sen. John McCain,
R-Ariz., one of the law's chief authors, said Congress not only would
reject the idea "but refuse to even consider" it.
Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the senior Democrat on the
Senate veterans panel, said in an interview he would oppose any
reallocation of funds "so long as there are delays and issues with
quality of care" at VA.
McDonald counters that the proposal, which has not been formally
submitted to Congress, would help ensure that "every veteran receives
the care they have earned and deserve regardless of where they choose to
get it from."
McDonald, who took over as VA secretary in July, said he never
intended to "gut the choice program or somehow eliminate" it. Instead,
he said, he simply seeks the kind of budget flexibility he enjoyed as
Procter & Gamble CEO.
"Imagine your household. You are hungry, but you can't move the money
from the gasoline account to the food account. Well, that is the
situation I face," he said at a Feb. 11 budget hearing before the House
Veterans Affairs Committee.
Louis Celli, director of veterans affairs and rehabilitation at The
American Legion, the largest veterans service organization, called
McDonald's explanation disingenuous.
"Draining funds from the bill short-circuits the program and
ultimately hurts vets," Celli said, noting that VA officials had pushed
for the choice program as a short-term way to expand patient access to
care.
Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., said a veteran in his rural district
drives 340 miles one-way for cardiology treatment at a VA hospital in
Kansas City.
"If the VA choice program can't provide something closer for him,
then we need to relook at how we are implementing that," Huelskamp told
McDonald at the Feb. 11 hearing.
McDonald said VA officials are willing to look at the 40-mile rule to
see if it needs to be changed. The VA is committed to doing all it can
to "make sure the program is robust," he said.
Republican governors in two states -- Maryland and Tennessee -- are
offering voluntary employee-buyout programs as a way to reduce
government beyond furloughs and cutting programs.
In Maryland, newly elected Gov. Larry Hogan is offering state
employees in agencies in the executive branch a lump sum payment of
$15,000, according to a letter dated Wednesday. They also would receive
an additional $200 for each year of service.
The program is part of Hogan's balanced budget plan that was released
last month and closed a budget shortfall of about $750 million.
"The goal of the program is to reduce the size of the state workforce
by allowing employees to elect to voluntarily leave state service,"
David Brinkley, Hogan's budget secretary, wrote in the letter.
He also said that closing the shortfall “required some very tough
decisions” but that the budget still managed to be structurally balanced
without eliminating agencies and programs, imposing furloughs or
eliminating filled state positions.
In Tennessee, Gov. Bill Haslam mentioned a voluntary buyout program
during a budget presentation earlier this week. And the administration’s
Department of Human Resources provided more details in a follow-up
email to state employees.
According to the email, only those employees determined eligible for
the buyout will be invited to participate in the program. Each
department and agency is working to determine what classifications will
be considered eligible.
A website, telephone line and email address have been established to
update and inform people about the program, as well as give them an
opportunity to ask questions.
Town hall meetings are also planned across the state to provide assistance to those interested.
In the Maryland program, the deadline to apply is March 13. People
who apply and are selected by the state would have to leave no later
than April 28.
The plan aims to save about $30 million.
Former Gov. Martin O'Malley included voluntary early separation in a
package of budget cuts approved by the state’s Board of Public Works
last month.
A Hogan spokesman said the governor is “simply following through with it."
O'Malley also offered voluntary separation in 2010 to help address a budget shortfall. More than 600 people accepted it in 2010.