In his first major rally since Special Counsel Robert Mueller
cleared him of any collusion with Russia, President Trump took the
stage before a boisterous full house at the Van Andel Arena in Grand
Rapids, Michigan, Thursday night -- and proceeded to tear into Democrats
and the FBI as unintelligent "frauds" who tried desperately to
undermine the results of the 2016 election. "The Democrats have to
now decide whether they will continue defrauding the public with
ridiculous bullsh--," Trump said to thunderous applause, "-- partisan
investigations, or whether they will apologize to the American people." Trump
continued to unload on his opponents: "I have a better education than
them, I'm smarter than them, I went to the best schools; they didn't.
Much more beautiful house, much more beautiful apartment. Much more
beautiful everything. And I'm president and they're not." Addressing
counterprotesters outside the arena and progressives in general, Trump
asked: "What do you think of their signs, 'Resist?' What the hell? Let's
get something done." Later,
Trump vowed to "close the damn border" unless Mexico halts two new
caravans he said have been approaching the United States rapidly. Trump
also hit at fraudulent asylum applicants, saying liberal lawyers often
have coached them in a "big fat con job" to claim they've feared for
their lives when they make it to the border. The economy, Trump
said to sustained cheers, "is roaring, the ISIS caliphate is defeated
100 percent, and after three years of lies and smears and slander, the
Russia hoax is finally dead. The collusion delusion is over. ... The
single greatest political hoax in the history of our country. And guess
what? We won." "I love campaigning against the Green New Deal," Trump remarked at one point. "One car per family -- you're going to love that in Michigan." Trump predicted that the former DOJ and FBI officials who pushed the collusion theory and
authorized secret surveillance warrants against members of his campaign
-- whom he incidentally called "major losers" -- would soon have "big
problems." Trump also characterized the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee as "little pencil-neck Adam Schiff, who has the smallest, thinnest neck I've ever seen," and someone who is "not a long-ball hitter." Schiff, D-Calif., who fiercely pushed collusion claims, has vowed to continue investigating Trump despite Mueller's findings -- even as Republicans have called for his resignation. Trump's rally prompted thousands of supporters to line the streets
hours beforehand in a festive atmosphere that included vendors selling
"Make America Great Again" hats and holding supportive signs.
People waiting for President Donald Trump to speak at the rally in
Grand Rapids, Mich., on Thursday. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
The evening was something of a homecoming: Trump
became the first Republican in over two decades to win Michigan in the
2016 presidential election, edging out Hillary Clinton thanks, in part,
to his decision to cap off his campaign with a final rally in Grand
Rapids shortly after midnight on Election Day. "This is our Independence Day," Trump told roaring attendees then. Thursday
night's event, though, was a mixture of homecoming and all-out victory
parade, in the wake of Mueller's conclusions. Enthusiastic fans --
including many who stood by Trump amid a torrent of unproven allegations
that he conspired with Russia to sway the 2016 election -- began to
encircle the Van Andel Arena as early as 3:30 a.m. Trump relived
the Election Day rally on Thursday, telling the crowd that he got home
at 4 a.m. in the morning and told Melania Trump that he had an
"incredible crowd" late into the evening and thought, "How the hell can I
lose Michigan? And guess what: We didn't lose Michigan."
President Donald Trump speaking at the rally in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Trump also dropped what he called "breaking news" for locals, promising, "I'm going to get full funding of $300 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, which you've been trying to get for over 30 years. It's time." Trump noted that MSNBC and CNN's ratings "dropped through the floor last night," while Fox News' ratings were "through the roof." Retired cabinet maker Ron Smith, 51, was one of the supporters who arrived to Thursday's rally early. He told the Detroit News outside the arena
that although "Republicans in Congress are trying to put stumbling
blocks in his path," nevertheless, "Donald Trump comes in here and gets
stuff done.” Separately,
Trump called the Jussie Smollet case an "embarrassment" both to Chicago
and to the U.S. and vowed to continue border wall construction. Trump also decried Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat who seemingly endorsed the practice of killing some infants after birth earlier this year. "In
recent months, the Democrat Party has also been aggressively pushing
extreme late-term abortion, allowing children to be ripped from their
mother’s womb up until the moment of birth," Trump said. "In Virginia,
the governor stated he would even allow a newborn baby to be executed." Senate Democrats blocked a GOP-led effort after Northam's remarks that would have established the standard of care owed to infants who survive failed abortions. In
remarks to reporters before he left the White House earlier in the
day, Trump previewed a wide-ranging rally on everything from the
economy to health care and border security. But there was little doubt
the president would devote a good deal of time to a victory lap on
Russia. Trump also promised to save the Special Olympics, after
the Education Department proposed cuts to the program in its latest
budget. "The Special Olympics will be funded. I just told my
people, I want to fund the Special Olympics and I just authorized a
funding of the Special Olympics," Trump said. "I've been to the Special
Olympics. I think it's incredible and I just authorized a funding. I
heard about it this morning. I have overridden my people. We're funding
the Special Olympics." In a fiery, exclusive interview with Fox News' "Hannity" Wednesday night, Trump vowed to release classified documents
that could shed light on the Russia probe's origins. He also accused
FBI officials of committing "treason" -- slamming former FBI Director
James Comey as a "terrible guy," former CIA Director John Brennan as
potentially mentally ill, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam
Schiff, D-Calif., as a criminal.
President Donald Trump arriving at Gerald R. Ford International
Airport in Grand Rapids, Mich., for his rally. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce
Ceneta)
Redacted versions of FISA documents already released have revealed that the FBI extensively relied on documents produced by Christopher Steele,
an anti-Trump British ex-spy working for a firm funded by the Hillary
Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, to surveil Trump
aide Carter Page. At least one senior DOJ official had apparent concerns
Steele was unreliable, according to text messages exclusively obtained
last week by Fox News. The leaked dossier, and related FBI
surveillance, kickstarted a media frenzy on alleged Russia-Trump
collusion that ended with a whimper on Sunday. Trump, on Thursday, told
the crowd in Michigan that the dossier was "dirty." Michigan
Democrats, meanwhile, organized a counter-rally nearby, with the party
saying it wanted to issue a "call for action and solutions on the
fundamental issues facing us all, like health care, education, clean
water, equality, immigrant rights, support for our military veterans,
jobs, the economy and more." A handful of protesters separately
waved "socialist alternative" flags and yelled, "No Trump, no KKK, no
fascists, USA," according to local reports. Republicans have
maintained that Trump has a good chance to win Michigan again in 2020,
although changing demographics could present some headwinds. In
November, Democrat Gretchen Whitmer defeated a Trump-backed candidate to
claim the state's governorship. "Democrats
are in a pickle and they put themselves here" by trumpeting the
investigation, said Brian "Boomer" Patrick, communications director for
GOP Michigan Rep. Bill Huizenga. "All the eggs were in one basket on the
Mueller report." At the end of the rally, Trump remarked, "the
Democrats took the people of Michigan for granted. With us, you will
never be forgotten again."
Masked swamp creatures showed up Thursday at the confirmation hearing
of Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt — creating a two-hour
political theatre performance, The Washington Post reported.
Quoting a statement from the activists from the Clean Water Fund,
Environment America, and Public Citizen, the Post reported the
demonstration was aimed at drawing attention to Bernhardt's "long list
of conflicts of interest with the oil & gas industry, and
highlighting his historic anti-environmental past."
As the hearing got underway, some protesters donned masks resembling
the Creature from the Black Lagoon. Others were clad in swamp-inspired
green couture and wore masks of Bernhardt's face. The protesters were
apparently not escorted out of the room until nearly two hours into the
hearing, the Post reported.
The environmental group Greenpeace also took part in the protest,
calling Bernhardt "a former oil and gas lobbyist who previously worked
to help corporate polluters get their hands on public lands." Bernhardt was nominated by President Donald Trump in February; he has
been acting secretary since Jan. 2, when Ryan Zinke resigned amid
multiple ethics probes.
He has drawn criticism for his background as a veteran lobbyist who
has helped orchestrate the push at the Interior Department to expand oil
and gas drilling, the Post reported.
President Donald Trump ought to focus on immigration and "zero in on
the border" – an issue he ran on in 2016 that still "has not been
solved," conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said Thursday. In an interview on Fox News' "Special Report,"
Limbaugh said it is "imperative" Trump take advantage of the "political
capital" he gained after the release of special counsel Robert
Mueller's report on Russia's meddling.
"My preference would be for the president to zero in on the border,
to zero in on immigration and stop this," he said. "We are being invaded
and we are being invaded by a bunch of people that have the
potential to totally destroy the makeup of our culture and the makeup
of our society. "And the Democrat party and the American left are in total support of
this. It has got to stop. The president got elected on that issue, and
it has not been solved. The wall has not been built on the border is
still wide open. It needs to be shut down."
Limbaugh also declared the current crop of Democrats in the running for the 2020 election is "beatable." "You take a look at the Democrats, what are they talking about? 'We
are diverse, we're wide open.' . . . who was leading in their polling
data? The 77-year-old white guy followed by a 75-year-old white guy," he
said, referring respectively to former Vice President Joe Biden and
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
"This is not what they want," he continued. "I don't think the
Democrat party wants to nominate an aging, old, white dinosaur from
Jurassic Park and the old-fashioned days of their party. Whoever they
nominate, I think they are imminently beatable. I don't think this push
to extreme leftist socialism has any chance of being supported by a vast
majority of the American people."
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 1:17 PM PT — Wednesday, March 27, 2019
“We are going to be the Republicans, the Party of Great Health Care.” — President Trump
President Trump is doubling down on his commitment to provide better
health care for all Americans. While speaking to reporters at the White
House, the president said Obamacare is “terrible” and the Democrats have
let Americans down. He said he has already gotten rid of the individual
mandate, which he described as the worst part of the health care law.
“Obamacare doesn’t work, it’s too expensive, and you take a look at
everything with deductibles — it’s a disaster, it’s disaster for our
people, we’re not going to allow it to go,” he stated.
The president went on to defend the Trump administration’s decision
to stand behind a federal judge’s ruling to strike down all of
Obamacare. The Justice Department submitted a filing to the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals, and the case could go all way up to the
Supreme Court.
President
Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Fabiana Rosales, a Venezuelan
activist who is the wife of Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido,
in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, March
27, 2019. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
“And if the Supreme Court Rules that Obamacare is out, we’ll have a
plan that is far-better than Obamacare,” said President Trump
The president has vowed to make the GOP the “Party of Health Care,”
and is calling on all Republicans to revive the effort to repeal and
replace Obamacare.
CHICAGO – An internal email from the office of Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx,
obtained by Fox News on Wednesday, asked assistant state's attorneys to
dig for any examples to bolster Foxx’s claim that the dropped charges
in the Jussie Smollett case weren’t as uncommon or shocking as they seemed. The
email read in part, “We are looking for examples of cases, felony
preferable, where we, in (exercising) our discretion, have entered into
verbal agreements with defense attorneys to dismiss charges against an
offender if certain conditions were met...” The email added,
“Nobody is in trouble, we are just looking for further examples of how
we, as prosecutors, use our discretion in a way that restores the
victim…” It was not clear who sent it, and exactly when it was
sent. Foxx recused herself from the case last February but defended her
office offering Smollett “an alternative prosecution model” in a series
of interviews Wednesday.
An internal email from Kim Foxx’s office obtained by Fox News
asked workers to dig for examples bolstering Foxx’s claim that the
dropped charges in the Jussie Smollett case weren’t as uncommon or
shocking as they seemed. (Getty, File)
Illinois Attorney Rod Drobinski told Fox News that
because a special prosecutor was not appointed in the Smollett
case, there were appearances of impropriety on behalf of Foxx's
office. “Even the prosecutor said it was a strong case. That makes it
even more unusual that they didn’t demand that he admit to what he did
as part of this dismissal.” Foxx
has been defending the decision by her staff to drop charges against
the “Empire” actor after investigators revealed he allegedly staged a
racist, anti-gay attack. Foxx told Fox 32 on Wednesday she
believed the matter was handled properly for a case of its kind. She
pointed to Smollett forfeiting his $10,000 bond and doing community
service. “When we look at similarly situated people charged with
this offense, without a background, I think in this case, justice was,
um, appropriate,” Foxx told Fox 32 Chicago. “He was availed to an
alternative prosecution model that anyone without these riches, without
this fame, would also be availed to.” Cook County prosecutors
dismissed all charges but still maintained Smollett lied about being
attacked in downtown Chicago on Jan. 29. And Mayor Rahm Emanuel has
called the dropping of charges “a whitewash.” Smollett’s attorney,
Patricia Brown Holmes, said in a statement: “We are disappointed the
local authorities have continued their campaign against Jussie Smollett
after the charges against him have been dropped. The facts are clear.
The Assistant State’s Attorney appeared in court and dismissed the
charges. Mr. Smollett forfeited his bond. The case is closed. No public
official has the right to violate Mr. Smollett’s due process rights. Mr.
Smollett, like every citizen, is innocent until proven guilty in a
court of law. Mr. Smollett is entitled to the same Constitutional
protections as any citizen charged by the government with a crime—
including the right to speak freely about his innocence, the right to be
viewed as innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and the right
to hold the State to its burden of proving him guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. None of that has occurred in this case.” The
National District Attorneys Association, which claims to
represent roughly 2,700 prosecutors’ offices around the country, heavily
criticized Foxx in a statement to Fox News. “First, when a chief
prosecutor recuses him or herself, the recusal must apply to the entire
office, not just the elected or appointed prosecutor. This is consistent
with best practices for prosecutors’ offices around the country,” the
statement began. It
added, “Second, prosecutors should not take advice from politically
connected friends of the accused. Each case should be approached with
the goal of justice for victims while protecting the rights of the
defendant. Third, when a prosecutor seeks to resolve a case through
diversion or some other alternative to prosecution, it should be done so
with an acknowledgement of culpability on the part of the defendant. A
case with the consequential effects of Mr. Smollett’s should not be
resolved without a finding of guilt or innocence.” The statement
concluded: “Fourth, expunging Mr. Smollett’s record at this immediate
stage is counter to transparency. Law enforcement will now not be able
to acknowledge that Mr. Smollett was indicted and charged with these
horrible crimes and the full record of what occurred will be forever
hidden from public view. Finally, we believe strongly that hate crimes
should be prosecuted vigorously but the burden of proof should not be
artificially increased due to the misguided decisions of others.” The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Americans can learn a great deal from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
investigation — it just won’t have anything to do with the Russia
collusion hoax.
In the end, Mueller’s $30 million investigative apparatus failed to
produce any evidence of collusion between President Trump’s 2016
election campaign and the Russian government, despite nearly two years
of intense effort by Mueller’s team of partisan lawyers with extensive
ties to the Democratic Party. As it turns out, the investigation was, indeed, a witch hunt. With its failure to uncover any evidence of collusion, though,
Mueller’s probe led to the revelation of something even more profound — a
systemic plot to overthrow President Trump from within the federal
government that the American people elected him to lead. Mueller’s
findings demonstrate, beyond a doubt, that high-ranking government
officials with access to sensitive information and extensive influence
over the justice system abused their power to give credence to made-up
allegations against the president. Had it not been for Mueller’s appointment, the American people would
likely never have known about the political cabal that was determined to
frame Donald Trump for treason and see Hillary Clinton elected
president. Although the details emerged gradually from a variety of
sources — most notably congressional investigations, leaks, and a
bombshell report by the Justice Department’s inspector general — all
were either motivated or made relevant by the Special Counsel
investigation that dominated the nation’s attention for two years. Just as then-candidate Trump was surging to a rare lead in the 2016
polls over Hillary Clinton, the FBI opened a secret investigation into
the Trump campaign. On July 31, 2016, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew
McCabe directed agent Peter Strzok to open a counterintelligence
investigation dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane” to spy on the Trump Campaign.
The evidence? A phony dossier filled with salacious but unverified
claims about Donald Trump that was bought and paid for by the Clinton
campaign. For the first time in American history, a candidate for the country’s
highest political office was allowed to use America’s intelligence
apparatus to spy on an opponent. The agent in charge of surveilling
candidate Trump, Peter Strzok, was the same agent who was later caught
saying he’d “stop” him from ever becoming president. “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
Strzok’s former mistress Lisa Page asked him in one text. “No. No he
won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded in August 2016, shortly after
opening “Crossfire Hurricane.” Around the same time, Page and Strzok — both of whom would go on to
serve on the Special Counsel’s team — had their notorious discussion of
the secretive "insurance policy" in case Trump actually became
president.
A few months after President Trump’s inauguration, Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein and his fellow D.C. bureaucrats were secretly
plotting to overthrow the duly elected president by engineering a mutiny
among his cabinet officials so that they would invoke the 25th
Amendment to remove him from office. It’s possible that these failed coup attempts would never have seen
the light of day if the plotters hadn’t gone a step too far by
orchestrating the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate
made-up allegations that the Trump Campaign colluded with Russia. The
Mueller investigation kept the public’s attention fixated on the
collusion hoax for nearly two years, giving the previous efforts to
overturn the results of the 2016 election relevance that they wouldn’t
otherwise have had. Even though the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate phony
collusion claims cooked up by political partisans was a travesty that
never should have been allowed to happen, its unintended consequence at
least offered a silver lining. Thanks to Robert Mueller’s investigation,
we now know that there’s an urgent need to root out political bias and
corruption among the career bureaucrats in our most powerful law
enforcement agencies entrusted with upholding the rule of law in this
country. As New York City’s 40th Police Commissioner, Bernard Kerik
was in command of the NYPD on September 11, 2001, and responsible for
the city’s response, rescue, recovery, and the investigative efforts of
the most substantial terror attack in world history. His 35-year career
has been recognized in more than 100 awards for meritorious and heroic
service, including a presidential commendation for heroism by President
Ronald Reagan, two Distinguished Service Awards from the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security, The Ellis Island Medal of Honor, and an
appointment as Honorary Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the
British Empire by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. To read more of his
reports — Click Here Now. The writer is author of the following: "The Grave Above the Grave," "From Jailer to Jailed," and "The Lost Son, A Life in Pursuit of Justice."
Attorney General William Barr has told the
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he's combing through
special counsel Robert Mueller's report, removing classified and other
information in hopes of releasing it to Congress in April. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told The Associated Press on
Wednesday that he had dinner the previous evening with Barr, who said he
is willing to testify before Graham's committee after he sends the
report to Congress. Justice Department officials said Tuesday that more
information could be released in "weeks, not months." Democrats, meanwhile, frowned at the waiting game. Rep. Elijah
Cummings, one of six committee chairmen who have demanded the full
report by Tuesday, said much about the path forward depends on whether
the report backs up Barr's conclusion that Mueller found no evidence
that Trump colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 elections.
By Barr's account, Mueller made no finding on whether the president
obstructed justice, a question now in Congress' hands.
"The president has now an opportunity for weeks, it sounds like, to
do these victory laps," while Democrats wait on key decisions about
investigating the administration, Cummings said. Challenges lie ahead for both the Republicans and the Democrats who
hope to deny Trump re-election next year. Both parties are readjusting
their aims and strategies in the post-probe landscape, pivoting to
health care and other issues that are more important for many voters,
even with Mueller's full findings still unknown. Graham said the attorney general is going through the report to take
out grand jury material and classified information, neither of which can
be publicly disclosed under the law. Barr wants to make sure nothing is released that could compromise
national security or intelligence sources and methods, Graham said. He
said Barr also told him he wants to check with prosecutors who have
cases associated with Mueller's Russia investigation. Mueller had
referred cases to other federal courts as part of his probe.
Graham later told CNN he had spoken to President Donald Trump about
the Mueller report, who said "just release it." Graham said Trump was
unlikely to claim executive privilege on any of the material. The attorney general released a four-page summary of Mueller's
confidential report on Sunday that said the special counsel did not find
that Trump's campaign "conspired or coordinated" with the Russian
government to influence the 2016 presidential election. It also said
that Mueller reached no conclusion on whether Trump obstructed the
federal investigation, instead setting out "evidence on both sides" of
the question. Emboldened by the end of the investigation, Trump on Tuesday strode
into a high-spirited gathering of Senate Republicans, flanked by party
leaders, saying the attorney general's summary of Mueller's report
"could not have been better." GOP senators applauded his arrival, and he
celebrated what he called his "clean bill of health." He showed an
eagerness to move on, Republicans said, specifically to focus anew on
repealing President Barack Obama's signature health care law.
At House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's own closed-door caucus meeting
Tuesday, she urged rank-and-file Democrats to "be calm" and focus on the
policy promises of health care, jobs and oversight of the
administration that helped propel them to the House majority last fall. "Let's just get the goods," Pelosi said. Not that the Democrats are forgetting Russia and the 2016
presidential election. Many Democrats dismiss Barr's four-page summary
as inadequate. "I haven't seen the Mueller report. I've seen the Barr report. And
I'm not going to base anything on the Barr report," said Rep. Jamie
Raskin of Maryland.
Trump has said he "wouldn't mind" if the full report were released.
But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he's hesitant to agree
to releasing information from Mueller that would "throw innocent people
who've not been charged under the bus." He is blocking legislation
approved unanimously by the House calling for the report's release. The president seemed to have heeded advice from allies, including
Graham, who encouraged him to use the political capital he's now gained
to accomplish policy goals. Pelosi's advice to Democrats to stick with the strategy that won them
control of the House in 2018 was reinforced by Obama himself, who
counseled freshman Democrats at a reception Monday night. Obama advised the newly elected lawmakers to focus on constituents'
hopes and concerns, while also identifying issues they feel so strongly
about that they'd be willing to lose their House seats in fights over
them, according to people at the private party. The focus must go beyond Russia and collusion, Democratic leaders said.
Forget the soul-searching. The media counterattack is underway. With harsh criticism
coming from the left as well as the right as Robert Mueller's probe
ends, the leaders of major news organizations, along with assorted
pundits, are defending their work and that of their colleagues. And most of them aren't giving an inch. Nope, they're basically saying we did everything right. They're
not reflecting on whether they banged the drum so loudly that it
sounded like Donald Trump's presidency was headed toward collapse.
They're not addressing whether they raised expectations for the probe to
an absurd degree. They're not discussing whether reporting bled into
commentary as more of its practitioners simultaneously joined the cable
news parade. The New York Times reached several of the news chiefs. CNN President Jeff Zucker is "entirely comfortable" with the network's handling of the story: "We
are not investigators. We are journalists, and our role is to report
the facts as we know them, which is exactly what we did. A sitting
president's own Justice Department investigated his campaign for
collusion with a hostile nation. That's not enormous because the media
says so. That's enormous because it's unprecedented." Washington
Post Executive Editor Marty Baron: "The special counsel investigation
documented, as we reported, extensive Russian interference in the 2016
election and widespread deceit on the part of certain advisers to the
president about Russian contacts and other matters. Our job is to bring
facts to light. Others make determinations about prosecutable criminal
offenses." And Dean Baquet, the Times' executive editor: "We wrote
a lot about Russia, and I have no regrets. It's not our job to
determine whether or not there was illegality." Joe Scarborough
offered a high-decibel defense the coverage on his MSNBC show: "Don't
knock reporters for The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street
Journal, the broadcast networks for doing their job right." He also took
several shots at Fox opinion hosts. Overall, I think there's something of a straw-man argument here. Of
course a criminal investigation of the Trump campaign, which yielded 37
indictments, and led to convictions of top former Trump associates,
needed to be covered extensively and aggressively. Of course the
fact that Mueller declined to bring further charges doesn't mean that
all the stories written about the allegations and Trump’s handling of
them — not to mention his constant attacks on the special counsel — were
wrong. And of course politicians can behave unethically without explicitly violating the law. So
the issue isn't coverage vs. no coverage. It's proportionate coverage
vs. Defcon 1 coverage, the drumbeat of here's-the-latest-outrage that
could sink the president vs. here-are-the-latest-developments and new
questions raised by our reporting. While "journalists aren't
investigators" in the law-enforcement sense, they routinely submit their
investigative work for prizes, and promote it as "a New York
Times/Washington Post/CNN investigation has found ..." And that's
without getting into the obliterated line between reporting, analysis
and cable punditry in an era when most of the reporters covering the
story have TV contracts. And that's without getting into commentary that
portrayed the president as a potential traitor orchestrating a coverup
that could lead to impeachment. By the way, Fox News covered the
hell out of this story too, though often in a skeptical vein and with
more of a focus on possible wrongdoing within Mueller's office, the DOJ
and the FBI, especially on the opinion side. But what's striking to me is how the condemnations are coming from both conservatives and liberals. Here's a piece in The Federalist: "For
the past two years, a large swath of the media engaged in a mass act of
self-deception and partisan groupthink. Perhaps it was Watergate envy,
or bitterness over Donald Trump's victory, or antagonism towards
Republicans in general — or, most likely, a little bit of all the above.
But now that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has delivered his report on
Russian collusion, it's clear that political journalists did the
bidding of those who wanted to delegitimize and overturn Trump's
election." And here's one from Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi: "Nobody
wants to hear this, but news that Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller is
headed home without issuing new charges is a death-blow for the
reputation of the American news media." Glenn Greenwald of the
Intercept told Fox that MSNBC "should have their top hosts on primetime,
go before the cameras and hang their head in shame, and apologize for
lying to people for three straight years ... "There was a whole
slew, not just me, of left-wing journalists with very high journalistic
credentials far more than anyone on that network, like Matt Taibbi and
Jeremy Scahill and many others, including myself who were banned from
the network because they wanted their audience not to know that anybody
was questioning or expressing skepticism about the lies and the scam
they were selling because it was so profitable." Alan Dershowitz,
the liberal Harvard law professor, sounded a similar note on Fox, saying
almost all the pundits "have just been dead wrong. It's time for them
to fess up, it's time for CNN to issue an apology. CNN banned me from
their air because I was being too fair. I was trying to assess what the
essential issue was, and I wasn't being partisan. They didn't want
that." Of course, Dershowitz got more Fox invitations once he was regularly defending Trump. The
president isn't exactly moving on, tweeting yesterday that "the
Mainstream Media is under fire and being scorned all over the World as
being corrupt and FAKE." After pushing the "Russian Collusion Delusion,"
he said, "They truly are the Enemy of the People and the Real
Opposition Party!" That’s the first time he's broadened the charge
beyond just the "fake news," and in my view goes too far. But when
you have Ted Koppel saying Trump is right that "the establishment press
is out to get him" — singling out the Times and Post — and former Times
editor Jill Abramson saying its news coverage is "unmistakably
anti-Trump," that ought to give people in the profession some pause. For its leading members to say they have no regrets misses why much of the country is losing confidence in the media.